Holographic Reality: Quantitative Implications # The Holographic Principle and the Quantification of Reality: Emergent Spacetime, Information Bounds, and the Future of Physical Law ## I. Introduction: Holography and the Fabric of Quantified Reality (A) The Holographic Conjecture Theoretical physics stands at a precipice, contemplating a paradigm shift potentially as profound as the advent of relativity or quantum mechanics. At the heart of this potential revolution lies the holographic principle, a conjecture suggesting that our perception of reality, particularly its spatial dimensions, might be fundamentally misleading. The principle asserts that the complete description of a volume of space, including all the physical phenomena occurring within it, can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary surrounding that region.1 This counter-intuitive notion implies that the fundamental degrees of freedom associated with a region do not scale with its volume, as intuition and conventional physical theories suggest, but rather with the area of its bounding surface.1 The analogy often invoked is that of an optical hologram, where a two-dimensional photographic plate can store all the information required to reconstruct a fully three-dimensional image.1 In this analogy, the universe we experience, with its three spatial dimensions teeming with galaxies, stars, and matter, could itself be a grand projection—a holographic image generated from information encoded on a distant, vast, two-dimensional surface, perhaps a cosmological horizon.1 This perspective challenges the very fabric of our quantified understanding of the cosmos. (B) The Challenge to Conventional Quantification The implications of such a principle for the quantification of physical systems are immense and far-reaching. Traditional physics, from classical mechanics to quantum field theory (QFT), operates under the assumption of locality–the idea that physical influences propagate through space point by point, and that fundamental degrees of freedom reside within volumes of space.8 This naturally leads to the expectation that the information content or entropy of a system should be proportional to its volume. The holographic principle directly contradicts this expectation, suggesting that volume itself might be illusory, an emergent property derived from a more fundamental, area-based description.1 This radical departure forces a re-evaluation of our most basic physical constructs. If the holographic principle holds true, conventional methods for quantifying physical systems, particularly those concerning information density, entropy limits, and the very nature of spatial and temporal dimensions, require fundamental revision.8 It suggests a profound interconnectedness and potential redundancy in the degrees of freedom assumed by local field theories, hinting that our current descriptions might be effective approximations rather than ultimate truths.8 The possibility arises that space, time, and perhaps even the laws governing them, emerge from an underlying informational substrate governed by holographic constraints.4 The conceptual shift implied here is significant. The holographic principle elevates information from a descriptive tool to a potential ontological foundation. It suggests that the ultimate constraints on physical reality might stem not directly from limitations on energy or matter distribution, but from fundamental bounds on how much information can be represented by the boundaries of spacetime regions. This perspective hints that the holographic principle is not merely a curious feature of exotic objects like black holes, but potentially a universal law governing any consistent theory that unifies quantum mechanics and gravity.8 Such a unification is necessary because the principle inherently links spacetime geometry (area) with quantum information (entropy/degrees of freedom).8 The apparent overcounting of degrees of freedom by local quantum field theories, when compared to the area-based limits suggested by holography, signals a deep tension. If a volume’s information can be fully captured by its boundary, the states within that volume cannot be entirely independent as assumed in local QFT; they must be subject to non-local constraints or correlations that drastically reduce the true number of independent variables.11 This points towards QFT potentially being a low-energy or low-information-density approximation of a more fundamental holographic reality. (C) Report Objectives and Structure This report aims to provide a rigorous, expert-level analysis of the quantitative implications of the holographic principle. It will delve into the origins of the principle within black hole thermodynamics and information bounds, explore its most successful theoretical realization in the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, and analyze the profound reinterpretations it necessitates for our quantitative understanding of space and time as potentially emergent phenomena. Furthermore, the report will investigate the implications for fundamental physical laws and the limitations imposed on quantum field theory, concluding with an overview of the outstanding theoretical challenges and the ongoing search for experimental or observational evidence. The analysis will synthesize current understanding based on established theoretical frameworks and recent research developments, structured to address these key facets systematically. ## II. The Genesis of Holography: Entropy, Black Holes, and Information Bounds The holographic principle did not emerge in a vacuum but grew organically from deep puzzles encountered in the study of black holes, particularly their thermodynamic properties and information content. The realization that black holes possess entropy, and that this entropy scales with area rather than volume, provided the crucial seed for holographic thinking. (A) Black Hole Thermodynamics: Seeds of Holography The journey towards holography began with attempts to reconcile the laws of thermodynamics with the seemingly paradoxical nature of black holes in the framework of general relativity. - The Area Law: In the early 1970s, Jacob Bekenstein made the audacious proposal that black holes must possess entropy.2 His motivation stemmed from the apparent violation of the second law of thermodynamics: if an object carrying entropy falls into a classical black hole, its entropy seems to vanish from the universe, as nothing can escape the event horizon.2 Bekenstein argued that to salvage the second law, the black hole itself must carry an entropy that increases by at least the amount swallowed. Drawing an analogy with the already known property that the area of a black hole’s event horizon never decreases in classical processes (Hawking’s area theorem, analogous to the second law) 1, Bekenstein proposed that black hole entropy (SBH) is proportional to the area (A) of its event horizon.5 Stephen Hawking later solidified this connection through his semi-classical calculations of black hole radiation, fixing the constant of proportionality. The resulting Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula is S_BH = A / (4Għ), where G is Newton’s constant and ħ is the reduced Planck constant (often expressed as A/4 in Planck units where G=ħ=c=1).1 This established a quantitative link between a thermodynamic quantity (entropy) and a geometric property (area). The four laws of black hole mechanics, concerning surface gravity (analogous to temperature), area (analogous to entropy), and mass (analogous to energy), were found to perfectly mirror the laws of thermodynamics, lending strong support to this connection.14 - Generalized Second Law (GSL): To formalize the preservation of the second law in processes involving black holes, Bekenstein proposed the Generalized Second Law (GSL): the sum of the entropy of matter outside black holes (Smatter) and the total Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of all black holes (SBH) never decreases (ΔStotal = ΔSmatter + ΔSBH ≥ 0).8 This principle elevates black holes to legitimate thermodynamic objects and implies that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is a real physical quantity that must be accounted for in thermodynamic balances. - Information Paradox Prelude: The discovery of Hawking radiation—the prediction that black holes emit thermal radiation due to quantum effects near the event horizon 1—introduced a deeper puzzle: the black hole information paradox. Since the emitted radiation appears thermal, it seems to carry no information about the specific details of the matter that formed the black hole or fell into it.2 As the black hole evaporates completely via this radiation, the initial information appears to be permanently lost, contradicting the fundamental principle of unitarity in quantum mechanics, which demands that information is always preserved.2 While not immediately obvious, the holographic principle, by suggesting information is stored on the boundary (horizon) rather than lost inside, would later emerge as a key framework for potentially resolving this paradox within theories like string theory.1 (B) The Bekenstein Bound: Quantifying Information Limits Building on the insights from black hole entropy, Bekenstein sought to establish a universal limit on the entropy content of any physical system, not just black holes. - Formulation: The Bekenstein bound provides an upper limit on the thermodynamic entropy (S) or Shannon information content that can be contained within a given finite region of space characterized by a radius R and containing a total mass-energy E.8 The bound is expressed as S ≤ 2πRE / (ħc) (using k=1 for Boltzmann’s constant).17 This inequality implies that for a system with finite size and energy, the information required to perfectly describe it must also be finite.17 - Derivation and Scope: Bekenstein’s original derivation was heuristic, based on a thought experiment: if a system existed that violated the bound (possessed too much entropy for its size and energy), one could seemingly violate the GSL by slowly lowering this system into a black hole without increasing the black hole’s entropy sufficiently.17 The bound represents the maximum entropy an object can have before it must collapse under its own gravity to form a black hole.1 Notably, the formula does not explicitly contain the gravitational constant G, suggesting potential applicability within quantum field theory even in curved spacetime, though gravity plays a crucial role in its enforcement.17 However, the bound’s validity is generally restricted to systems with limited self-gravity, where gravity is not the dominant force, and it may fail for sufficiently large regions in cosmology or for gravitationally collapsing objects.9 In 2008, Casini provided a rigorous proof within the framework of quantum field theory, interpreting the bound in terms of the positivity of relative entropy between an excited state and the vacuum state, thereby avoiding issues with UV divergences in naive definitions of energy and entropy.17 - Implications: The Bekenstein bound provides quantitative support for the idea that information is fundamentally limited by geometric properties, specifically relating entropy to both size (R) and energy (E). It reinforces the challenge to simple volume scaling of information.2 Crucially, black holes are seen as systems that saturate this bound (or a related bound S ≤ A/4), representing the most efficient way to pack entropy/information into a given region.17 Any attempt to exceed this limit locally would lead to gravitational collapse, forming a black hole whose own entropy (proportional to its new, larger area) respects the bound. This interplay underscores the deep connection between gravity, information limits, and the stability of physical systems. Even though the formula S ≤ 2πRE/ħc lacks an explicit G, gravity is implicitly the ultimate enforcer of this informational constraint through the mechanism of gravitational collapse.9 (C) The Covariant Entropy Bound (Bousso Bound): Towards Universality The limitations of the Bekenstein bound, particularly its restriction to weakly gravitating systems and dependence on a non-covariant notion of radius R, motivated the search for a more general formulation of entropy limits applicable in arbitrary spacetimes. Raphael Bousso proposed the Covariant Entropy Bound (often called the Bousso bound) to meet this need.9 - Motivation: The Bekenstein bound is known to fail in situations dominated by gravity, such as the interior of a black hole or within large volumes of an expanding Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe, where volume can grow faster than area.9 A truly universal statement of the holographic principle required a formulation independent of specific symmetries or gravitational field strengths. - Formulation: The Bousso bound shifts focus from volumes to “light-sheets.” For any arbitrary (spatial, co-dimension 2) surface B with area A, one considers null hypersurfaces (surfaces traced by light rays) emanating orthogonally from B. A “light-sheet” L(B) is such a null hypersurface where the generating light rays are non-expanding (i.e., converging or parallel) as they move away from B.9 The bound states that the total entropy S crossing the light-sheet L(B) cannot exceed one-quarter of the initial area A of the surface B (in Planck units): S ≤ A/4Għ.9 Since there are typically four null directions orthogonal to B (two future-directed, two past-directed), there can be up to four potential light-sheets associated with any surface, but the bound applies specifically to those where the initial expansion is non-positive.23 - Generality and Applicability: The key strengths of the Bousso bound are its covariance (formulation is independent of coordinate choices) and its purported universality.9 It applies to surfaces of any shape, open or closed, located anywhere in spacetime.9 It has been successfully tested in various theoretical scenarios, including FRW cosmologies and black hole interiors, where the Bekenstein bound is inadequate.9 The bound is closely related to the GSL and relies on the focusing effect of matter-energy on light rays (via the Raychaudhuri equation and energy conditions like the Null Energy Condition) to ensure light-sheets terminate and bound a finite amount of entropy.21 While initially formulated classically, proposals exist to generalize it to the quantum regime by incorporating entanglement entropy across the boundary surface B, potentially restoring validity even when classical energy conditions are violated by quantum effects.25 (D) Formulating the Holographic Principle Synthesizing the insights from black hole thermodynamics and entropy bounds led Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind to formally propose the holographic principle in the early 1990s.1 - Core Assertion: The holographic principle fundamentally asserts that the maximum information content (or number of fundamental degrees of freedom) within any region of space is bounded not by its volume, but by the area of its boundary, specifically about one bit per Planck area (A/4Għ in natural units).1 It posits that a complete physical description of the bulk volume can be represented as if encoded on this lower-dimensional boundary.1 - Origins Summary: The principle’s conceptual pillars are the Bekenstein-Hawking area law for black hole entropy 1, which demonstrated that the object with the highest possible entropy density has its entropy determined by its surface area, and the subsequent development of the Bekenstein and Bousso bounds generalizing this area scaling.1 Later developments in string theory, particularly the AdS/CFT correspondence, provided powerful theoretical evidence and a concrete mathematical realization of the principle.1 The progression from the specific case of black holes to the general entropy bounds suggests a deep, underlying principle at play. Information, quantified by entropy, appears to be the primary quantity constrained by the geometry of spacetime boundaries. Gravity, through mechanisms like gravitational collapse and the focusing of light rays, acts as the enforcer of these bounds. The stark quantitative contradiction between the area scaling mandated by holography (S ~ A ~ R²) and the volume scaling expected from local degrees of freedom in QFT (S ~ V ~ R³) remains the central motivation.8 Holography resolves this tension by fundamentally altering our conception of degrees of freedom, asserting that the apparent volume is an emergent description derived from information residing on the boundary.1 Table 1: Comparison of Entropy Bounds | | | | |---|---|---| |Feature|Bekenstein Bound|Covariant (Bousso) Bound| |Formulation (Eq.)|S ≤ 2πRE / (ħc)|S ≤ A(B) / (4Għ)| |Entropy Type|Matter/System Entropy|Entropy Flux across Light-Sheet| |Geometric Region|Volume enclosed by Sphere (Radius R)|Light-Sheet L(B) from Surface B (Area A)| |Applicability|Weakly Gravitating Systems|General Spacetimes (incl. Strong Gravity)| |Covariance|No (Relies on specific slicing/radius)|Yes (Based on covariant light-sheets)| |Key Assumption|Generalized Second Law (GSL)|Null Energy Condition / Focusing| |Relation to BH Entropy|Inspired by/Saturated by BHs|Generalizes Area Law| ## III. Realizing Holography: The AdS/CFT Correspondence While the holographic principle emerged from general arguments involving black holes and entropy bounds, its most concrete and quantitatively successful realization comes from string theory, specifically through the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence. This duality provides a precise mathematical framework embodying holographic ideas. (A) The Gauge/Gravity Duality: AdS/CFT Explained - Core Conjecture: The AdS/CFT correspondence, proposed by Juan Maldacena in 1997, conjectures a precise equivalence, or duality, between two seemingly disparate types of physical theories.19 On one side is a theory of quantum gravity (typically formulated within string theory or M-theory) living in a (d+1)-dimensional spacetime known as Anti-de Sitter space (AdS). On the other side is a quantum field theory, specifically a Conformal Field Theory (CFT), which lives on the d-dimensional boundary of that AdS spacetime.1 A CFT is a quantum field theory that is invariant under conformal transformations (transformations that preserve angles but not necessarily lengths, including scaling).34 The conjecture states that these two theories are dynamically equivalent–they are different mathematical descriptions of the same underlying physical reality. - Origin in String Theory: Maldacena’s original insight arose from studying configurations of D-branes in string theory.19 Specifically, he considered a stack of N coincident D3-branes in Type IIB superstring theory. At low energies, the dynamics of open strings ending on these branes is described by a 4-dimensional N=4 Super-Yang-Mills (SYM) theory, which is a highly symmetric CFT.19 In a different regime (taking the near-horizon limit of the gravitational solution sourced by the D3-branes), the physics is described by Type IIB string theory propagating in a curved 10-dimensional spacetime: AdS5 × S5 (a 5-dimensional AdS space times a 5-dimensional sphere).19 Maldacena conjectured that these two descriptions are exactly dual to each other.5 This specific AdS5/CFT4 duality remains the most studied and best understood example of the correspondence. - Holographic Nature: The AdS/CFT correspondence is widely regarded as the most successful and precise implementation of the holographic principle.1 The lower-dimensional boundary CFT, which contains no explicit gravity, is asserted to completely encode all the information and dynamics of the higher-dimensional bulk theory, including its quantum gravitational aspects.6 The boundary theory acts like a hologram for the bulk physics. - Strong-Weak Duality: A crucial feature making AdS/CFT exceptionally useful is that it typically manifests as a strong-weak coupling duality.19 The parameters of the two theories are related in such a way that when the coupling constant in the boundary CFT is large (making calculations using standard perturbative QFT methods intractable), the corresponding coupling in the bulk gravity theory is small. In this regime, the quantum gravity theory can often be approximated by classical (super)gravity, which is much easier to calculate with.30 Conversely, when the CFT is weakly coupled, the bulk theory is strongly coupled and highly quantum. This duality allows physicists to use tractable calculations in classical gravity to study previously inaccessible phenomena in strongly coupled quantum field theories, finding applications in nuclear physics (quark-gluon plasma) and condensed matter physics.19 (B) Spacetime Geometry in AdS/CFT: Bulk Reconstruction The duality implies a deep connection between the structure of the boundary CFT and the geometry of the bulk AdS spacetime. - AdS Geometry: Anti-de Sitter space is a maximally symmetric spacetime solution to Einstein’s equations with a negative cosmological constant.14 It can be visualized as a solid cylinder, where time runs along the cylinder’s axis and spatial slices are hyperbolic disks.6 The radial direction moving outwards from the center of the disk corresponds to an energy scale in the dual CFT.19 A key property is that the boundary of AdS is infinitely far in proper distance from any point in the interior, yet light can travel to the boundary and back in finite time.19 This boundary is where the dual CFT resides.6 - The Holographic Dictionary: The equivalence between the bulk and boundary theories is formalized through a “holographic dictionary”.19 This dictionary provides a precise mapping between elements in the AdS gravity theory and elements in the boundary CFT. For example, fields propagating in the bulk AdS correspond to specific operators in the CFT. The mass of a bulk field is related to the scaling dimension of the corresponding CFT operator. Correlation functions of operators in the CFT can be calculated from the dynamics of fields in the bulk AdS.37 - Bulk from Boundary: A central tenet of AdS/CFT is that the entire bulk spacetime geometry, along with the physics within it, can be reconstructed from information encoded in the boundary CFT.34 The state of the CFT determines the geometry of the dual AdS spacetime. A particularly important aspect is the UV/IR connection: features of the CFT at high energies (ultraviolet, UV) correspond to physics in the bulk near the AdS boundary, while low-energy (infrared, IR) features of the CFT correspond to physics deep within the bulk interior.30 This implies that the radial dimension of the bulk effectively emerges from the energy scale of the boundary theory. Properties like bulk locality, causality, and even the existence of smooth geometry are thought to arise from specific properties of the CFT, such as large N (number of degrees of freedom) and strong coupling.30 The AdS/CFT correspondence provides the most concrete evidence for the holographic principle, demonstrating mathematically how a gravitational theory in a higher dimension can be fully captured by a lower-dimensional non-gravitational theory.1 However, it is important to recognize that this realization is specific to Anti-de Sitter spacetimes, which possess a negative cosmological constant and a convenient boundary structure.35 Our observable universe, particularly on large scales, appears to be accelerating and better described by a de Sitter spacetime with a positive cosmological constant, or potentially flat space.40 Extending the precise holographic dictionary of AdS/CFT to these more realistic cosmological settings remains a significant and outstanding challenge in theoretical physics.37 Despite this limitation, AdS/CFT offers invaluable insights. The duality explicitly shows how gravity can emerge from a fundamentally non-gravitational system.6 The boundary CFT is a well-defined quantum theory without intrinsic gravity, yet its dynamics are equivalent to string theory (which includes gravity) in the bulk. This lends powerful support to the idea that gravity might not be fundamental but rather an emergent phenomenon arising from the collective behavior of many underlying quantum degrees of freedom, mirroring ideas from condensed matter physics or thermodynamics.29 Furthermore, the emergence of a smooth, classical gravitational description in the bulk is often tied to specific limits in the boundary theory, particularly the large N limit, where N represents the number of underlying degrees of freedom (like the rank of the gauge group in N=4 SYM).30 In this limit (specifically, the ‘t Hooft limit where N → ∞ while the ‘t Hooft coupling λ = g²YM N is held fixed), the gauge theory simplifies, and the dual string theory becomes weakly coupled, allowing it to be approximated by classical supergravity.30 This suggests that the classical spacetime we perceive might be a macroscopic, statistical description valid only when a huge number of fundamental quantum constituents are involved. Quantum gravitational corrections in the bulk correspond to corrections (e.g., 1/N corrections or stringy α’ corrections) in the boundary theory, providing a potential avenue to systematically study quantum gravity effects. ## IV. Emergent Dimensions: Rethinking Space and Time Quantitatively The holographic principle, particularly as realized in AdS/CFT, motivates a radical rethinking of the nature of spacetime itself. Instead of viewing space and time as a fundamental, pre-existing background arena for physics, holography suggests they might be emergent phenomena, arising from more fundamental, possibly non-geometric, quantum degrees of freedom and their interactions. (A) Space as an Emergent Construct: Beyond Fundamental Geometry - The Emergence Hypothesis: A central implication drawn from holography is that spacetime geometry is not fundamental but emergent.29 This contrasts sharply with both classical general relativity, where spacetime is dynamic but still the basic manifold, and traditional quantum field theory, which assumes a fixed background spacetime.36 Emergent spacetime proposes that the familiar notions of distance, locality, dimension, and even the smoothness of the spacetime manifold arise from the collective behavior or correlational structure of underlying quantum information. - Quantum Entanglement as the “Glue”: Increasingly, quantum entanglement is seen as the crucial ingredient responsible for “weaving” the fabric of emergent spacetime. Several key ideas quantify this connection: - Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) Formula: Proposed by Ryu and Takayanagi in 2006, this formula provides a stunning quantitative link between quantum information in the boundary CFT and geometry in the bulk AdS space. It states that the entanglement entropy (S_EE) of a spatial region A on the boundary is proportional to the area of the minimal-area surface (γ_A) in the bulk that ends on the boundary of A (∂A): S_EE(A) = Area(γ_A) / (4Għ).30 This formula suggests that geometric areas in the bulk spacetime are directly determined by entanglement patterns in the boundary quantum state. It provides a concrete way to calculate a geometric quantity from a quantum informational one, supporting the idea that geometry emerges from entanglement. Subsequent refinements (like the HRT covariant version and quantum corrections) further strengthen this connection.34 - ER=EPR Conjecture: Proposed by Maldacena and Susskind in 2013, this conjecture posits an equivalence between quantum entanglement (EPR, after Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) and geometric connections via wormholes or Einstein-Rosen bridges (ER).30 Specifically, if two quantum systems (e.g., two black holes) are maximally entangled, their dual geometric description involves a wormhole connecting them. This suggests that the very connectivity of spacetime–what makes it a coherent whole rather than disconnected points–is directly related to quantum entanglement between its underlying constituents. Disentangling the systems would correspond to breaking the wormhole. - Quantitative Models of Emergent Space: Beyond the conceptual framework provided by RT and ER=EPR, various models attempt to explicitly construct emergent space: - AdS/CFT as a Model: As discussed, the AdS/CFT correspondence itself serves as the primary example where a (d+1)-dimensional bulk geometry demonstrably emerges from the dynamics of a d-dimensional QFT.6 The bulk radial dimension corresponds to the energy scale (renormalization group flow) of the boundary theory. - Tensor Networks (MERA): Tensor networks, particularly the Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz (MERA), provide discrete toy models exhibiting holographic properties.46 MERA can be visualized as a network that builds up the quantum state of a critical system layer by layer, effectively performing entanglement renormalization. This network structure naturally defines a discrete geometry with an extra dimension corresponding to the scale. Remarkably, MERA networks applied to 1D critical systems share structural similarities with spatial slices of AdS, and excitations within the network can mimic the behavior of particles in an AdS background, including gravitational potentials arising from the entanglement structure.46 These models offer a concrete way to see how spatial geometry can emerge from entanglement patterns. - Quantum Reference Frames/Relational Models: Some approaches attempt to build emergent spacetime directly from the relational properties of entangled quantum systems, without assuming a pre-existing background or specific dualities like AdS/CFT.35 These models might define distance based on entanglement measures or correlations between particles. Space emerges as a metric space defined by these quantum relationships, potentially offering a route to background independence and applicability beyond AdS.35 These diverse approaches converge on the idea that geometry is not fundamental but derived. The quantitative relationships offered by the RT formula, complexity conjectures (discussed below), and tensor network models provide concrete avenues for understanding how geometric quantities like area, volume, and connectivity might arise directly from quantum informational quantities like entanglement entropy and complexity. This marks a significant shift from viewing spacetime as a container to viewing it as a manifestation of the quantum information it encodes. (B) Time as an Emergent Phenomenon: Complexity and Entropy’s Arrow Just as space may be emergent, the holographic perspective also challenges the fundamental nature of time, suggesting it too might arise from underlying quantum dynamics. - The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity: In canonical approaches to quantum gravity, attempting to quantize general relativity directly often leads to the “problem of time”.44 The fundamental equations, like the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, appear to be timeless, lacking an explicit time evolution parameter. This suggests that time, as we experience it, might not be a fundamental aspect of reality at the Planck scale but rather an emergent feature of certain states or approximations. - Complexity Growth as Time: One prominent proposal links the perception of time’s flow to the growth of the quantum computational complexity of the universe’s state.44 Complexity, roughly speaking, measures the minimum number of elementary quantum gates needed to prepare a given state from a simple reference state. For chaotic quantum systems, complexity is expected to grow linearly for an extremely long time before saturating at a maximum value. The “Complexity-Time Correspondence Theorem” formalizes this linear growth (C(t) ≈ λt).44 The idea is that this persistent, directed increase in complexity serves as the physical basis for our experience of time’s passage and its arrow. - Holographic Complexity Conjectures: Within the AdS/CFT context, this idea is made more concrete through conjectures relating boundary state complexity to bulk geometric quantities: - Complexity = Volume (CV): This conjecture proposes that the complexity of the boundary CFT state at time t is dual to the spatial volume V of a maximal-volume slice in the bulk AdS spacetime that reaches the boundary at time t: C(t) ∝ V(t) / (Għ * L_AdS), where L_AdS is the AdS curvature radius.45 In this picture, the growth of complexity over time corresponds directly to the increase in the volume of the associated bulk region. - Complexity = Action (CA): An alternative proposal relates complexity to the classical gravitational action evaluated on a specific region of the bulk spacetime called the Wheeler-DeWitt patch. - Entanglement Entropy and Time’s Arrow: The growth of entanglement entropy also provides a potential link to the arrow of time, particularly in non-equilibrium situations. Following a quantum quench or during cosmological expansion, entanglement entropy typically increases, mirroring the increase of thermodynamic entropy described by the second law.44 This suggests that the arrow of time might be fundamentally rooted in the tendency of quantum systems to become more entangled over time. - Stability and Quantum Error Correction: For time to emerge reliably, the process driving its emergence (like complexity growth) should be robust against small perturbations or errors. It has been proposed that mechanisms analogous to quantum error correction, which protect quantum information from noise, might play a role in stabilizing the emergent structure of spacetime and the consistent flow of time.44 The holographic mapping itself exhibits features reminiscent of quantum error correcting codes, where information about the bulk interior is redundantly encoded across the boundary.48 The emergence of time from complexity or entanglement suggests a crucial distinction. The parameter ‘t’ that might appear in fundamental, potentially timeless quantum gravity equations (like the Wheeler-DeWitt equation) could be different from the operational, experienced time T_emergent associated with the growth of C(t) or S(t). This allows for a scenario where the underlying laws are static or timeless, yet a dynamic, directed flow of time emerges from the evolution of the system’s quantum informational properties. Furthermore, if spacetime emerges from quantum information, and quantum states can be observer-dependent (e.g., relative to measurement choices or reference frames), then the emergent spacetime geometry itself might inherit this observer dependence.35 The way entanglement is perceived, or the complexity calculated, could depend on the observer’s state of motion or interaction with the system. This would fundamentally challenge the classical notion of a single, objective spacetime manifold, replacing it with a more contextual, participatory reality where the structure of spacetime is intertwined with the observer’s quantum description.12 Table 2: Models of Emergent Spacetime and Time | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---| |Concept/Model|Proposed Mechanism|Key Quantitative Relation|Connection to Holography|Status/Evidence| |AdS/CFT Duality|Bulk gravity/geometry emerges from boundary QFT dynamics|Holographic Dictionary (Operator/Field Map)|Prime Example/Realization|Strong theoretical evidence (string theory checks)| |Ryu-Takayanagi Formula|Bulk minimal area emerges from boundary entanglement entropy|S_EE = Area / (4Għ)|Quantifies bulk/boundary entanglement-geometry link|Well-established in AdS/CFT, many checks, extensions| |ER=EPR Conjecture|Spacetime connectivity (wormholes) emerges from quantum entanglement|Entanglement ⇔ Wormhole|Conceptual link between entanglement and topology|Plausible conjecture, active research area| |Complexity=Volume/Action|Bulk volume/action emerges from boundary state complexity; Time flow from C growth|C ∝ Volume or C ∝ Action|Relates bulk geometry/dynamics to boundary complexity|Conjectures within AdS/CFT, active investigation| |Tensor Networks (MERA)|Discrete spatial dimension emerges from entanglement renormalization structure|Network Geometry ⇔ AdS Slice|Toy model exhibiting holographic scaling/geometry|Provides insights, computational tool, analog systems| |Quantum Reference Frames|Metric space emerges from relational distances between entangled particles|Distance Function from Entanglement|Potential background-independent holography|Developing theoretical framework| |Quantum Causal Histories|Spacetime emerges from information-theoretic/computational substrate|(Model Dependent)|Alternative emergent gravity/spacetime scenario|Conceptual/Theoretical models| ## V. Foundational Implications: Gravity, Laws, and Quantum Fields The holographic principle and the associated concept of emergent spacetime have profound implications that ripple through the very foundations of physics, challenging our understanding of gravity, the nature of physical laws, and the validity of quantum field theory as a fundamental description. (A) Gravity from Thermodynamics: The Einstein Equation as an Equation of State One of the most striking consequences stemming from the ideas underpinning holography, particularly the entropy-area relationship, is the possibility that gravity itself is not a fundamental force but an emergent thermodynamic phenomenon. - Jacobson’s Derivation: In a seminal 1995 paper, Ted Jacobson demonstrated that Einstein’s field equations of general relativity can be derived from purely thermodynamic arguments applied to local patches of spacetime.17 The derivation assumes the fundamental relationship δQ = TdS (the Clausius relation, a cornerstone of thermodynamics) holds for “local Rindler horizons”–the causal horizons perceived by accelerating observers in any small, approximately flat region of spacetime. Here, δQ is interpreted as the energy flux (heat) crossing the horizon, T is the Unruh temperature experienced by the accelerated observer due to quantum vacuum fluctuations (T = ħκ/2π, where κ is the acceleration), and dS is the change in entropy associated with the horizon.51 Crucially, Jacobson assumed that the entropy is proportional to the horizon area, dS = η δA, where η is a constant later fixed by consistency to relate to Newton’s constant G (η = 1/(4Għ)).53 By demanding that δQ = TdS holds for all local Rindler horizons through any point, Jacobson showed that the spacetime geometry must curve in response to matter-energy flux (Tab) precisely according to Einstein’s field equations (Rab − (1/2)Rgab + Λgab = 8πG Tab).53 - Implications: This derivation suggests a radical reinterpretation: Einstein’s equation, the bedrock of our understanding of gravity, might not be a fundamental dynamical equation to be quantized directly, but rather an equation of state for spacetime itself, analogous to the ideal gas law emerging from the statistical mechanics of molecules.51 Gravity, in this view, emerges from the statistical thermodynamics of underlying, perhaps unknown, microscopic degrees of freedom whose entropy is captured by horizon area.28 This perspective aligns with and is inspired by black hole thermodynamics and the holographic principle’s emphasis on area and entropy.50 Related ideas, such as Erik Verlinde’s proposal of gravity as an entropic force arising from changes in information associated with the positions of material bodies, and Thanu Padmanabhan’s extensive work on the thermodynamic interpretation of gravitational field equations, further explore this paradigm.36 - Connection to Holography: The thermodynamic derivation relies fundamentally on the entropy-area relationship, which is a cornerstone of the holographic principle.50 By applying this relationship locally everywhere in spacetime via Rindler horizons, Jacobson’s work suggests that the holographic connection between geometry and information/entropy is not just a feature of specific systems like black holes or AdS space, but might be the underlying principle from which the dynamics of spacetime (i.e., gravity) emerge universally. (B) Reformulating Physical Laws in a Holographic Universe If the universe is fundamentally holographic and possesses a finite information capacity, this has profound implications for the nature and status of physical laws themselves. - Finite Information Limits: As discussed earlier, cosmological observations and holographic bounds suggest that any finite region of spacetime, including our observable universe, has a maximum information content, estimated to be around 10¹²² bits.57 If this bound is fundamental, it implies that physical laws cannot be described with infinite precision.57 Mathematical constructs like real numbers, continuous functions, and infinitely precise coupling constants, which are ubiquitous in current physical laws, would have to be viewed as idealizations or approximations of an underlying reality constrained by finite information.57 The laws themselves must be encodable within the available information budget of the universe. - Laws as Emergent Software: This finiteness challenges the traditional Platonist view of physical laws as perfect, immutable mathematical truths existing independently of the physical universe they describe.57 An alternative perspective, strongly motivated by the information-centric view of holography, is that laws are more akin to algorithms or software running on the physical “hardware” of the universe.57 The laws emerge from, and are constrained by, the universe’s fundamental information processing capabilities. This view opens the possibility that laws might not be fixed for all eternity but could potentially evolve as the universe expands and its information content grows, although such effects would likely be extremely small.57 - Holography and Symmetries: The massive redundancy implied by holography (encoding volume information onto a smaller area) might be related to underlying symmetries. It has been suggested, using arguments based on Noether’s theorems relating symmetries and conservation laws, that a deep, hidden symmetry structure might be required to ensure that the seemingly numerous bulk degrees of freedom can be consistently described by the fewer boundary degrees of freedom.59 Understanding these symmetries could be key to understanding the mechanism of holography. - Quantum Information as Foundational: Some interpretations take the emergence idea further, proposing that quantum information itself is the fundamental ontological constituent of reality.12 In this view, concepts like entanglement, qubits, and information processing are primary, and spacetime, particles, forces, and the laws governing them all emerge from the dynamics and structure of this underlying quantum information.12 This potential shift from Platonic, external laws to physical, information-constrained, emergent laws represents a fundamental change in the philosophy of physics. It suggests that the laws of nature are not merely discovered by us but are intrinsically part of, and limited by, the physical system of the universe itself. (C) Challenging Locality and Quantum Field Theory Assumptions Holography directly confronts some of the core assumptions underlying quantum field theory, suggesting QFT is not the final word in fundamental physics. - Breakdown of Locality: Locality, the principle that objects are only directly influenced by their immediate surroundings, is a cornerstone of QFT. Holography fundamentally challenges this. If information about a bulk region is encoded non-locally across its boundary, then the degrees of freedom within the bulk cannot be truly independent local entities.8 Actions on one part of the boundary can, in principle, affect the description of distant points in the bulk interior, mediated through the holographic map. - QFT as an Effective Theory: The quantitative discrepancy between the volume scaling of degrees of freedom naively expected in QFT (proportional to V/l_cutoff³) and the area scaling dictated by holographic entropy bounds (A/4Għ) is perhaps the strongest argument for QFT being an effective, rather than fundamental, theory.8 QFT appears to drastically overcount the true number of independent degrees of freedom available in a region when gravity is taken into account. It likely provides an accurate description only in regimes where gravitational effects are weak and information densities are far below the holographic limit.8 The holographic bounds (A/4Għ) define the quantitative scale–related to Planck density or strong gravity–where the local QFT description must break down due to these gravitational/holographic constraints. - UV/IR Mixing: In local QFTs, physics at different energy scales (or distance scales) typically decouples. High-energy (UV) phenomena do not usually affect low-energy (IR) physics directly, except through renormalization. Holographic theories, particularly AdS/CFT, exhibit UV/IR mixing. As mentioned, UV physics on the boundary relates to the bulk near the boundary, while IR physics on the boundary relates to the deep bulk interior.30 This entanglement of scales is characteristic of quantum gravity and differs significantly from the behavior of local QFTs. - Unitary Inequivalence and Horizons: Even within the framework of QFT in curved spacetime, issues arise that hint at foundational problems when combining quantum fields with dynamic geometry. The Unruh effect demonstrates that the vacuum state perceived by an inertial observer appears as a thermal bath to an accelerated observer.60 These two descriptions (inertial vacuum vs. accelerated thermal state) correspond to unitarily inequivalent representations of the quantum field algebra. This means there isn’t a simple unitary transformation connecting the two observers’ description of the state. Since gravity can be locally mimicked by acceleration (Equivalence Principle), this suggests fundamental difficulties in defining consistent quantum states in the presence of gravitational horizons and achieving background independence, potentially signaling the need for modifications to QFT or quantum mechanics itself when gravity is strong.60 These converging lines of argument—gravity emerging from thermodynamics, laws emerging from information constraints, and QFT breaking down at holographic limits—paint a picture where the foundations of physics may need significant reconstruction, guided by the principles of holography and information. ## VI. Frontiers and Challenges Despite the compelling theoretical arguments and the success of AdS/CFT, the holographic principle remains a conjecture facing significant theoretical obstacles and a lack of direct experimental confirmation. Research is actively pushing the boundaries on multiple fronts. (A) Open Questions and Theoretical Obstacles Several major theoretical challenges must be overcome to fully understand and utilize the holographic principle: - Beyond AdS: The most pressing challenge is to generalize holography beyond the specific context of Anti-de Sitter space.35 Our universe appears to be asymptotically de Sitter (dS) due to dark energy, or perhaps flat. Formulating a precise holographic duality for dS or flat spacetimes is notoriously difficult. Unlike AdS, these spacetimes lack a convenient timelike boundary where a local dual QFT can be naturally defined.61 Existing proposals like dS/CFT (often placing the dual theory at future infinity) or celestial holography (using symmetries of the celestial sphere at null infinity) are less developed and face conceptual hurdles.37 Understanding how holography manifests without the scaffolding of the AdS boundary is crucial for applying the principle to realistic cosmology. The different nature of cosmological horizons compared to black hole or AdS horizons likely requires a fundamentally different holographic dictionary. - Mechanism of Holography: Even within the well-studied AdS/CFT framework, the precise mechanism by which the lower-dimensional boundary theory encodes the higher-dimensional bulk is not fully understood.11 What are the fundamental degrees of freedom being counted by the area law? How exactly do locality and the radial dimension emerge from the boundary theory’s dynamics? While entanglement and complexity provide key pieces of the puzzle (e.g., via RT formula, MERA), a complete constructive understanding is missing. - Bulk Reconstruction: While the holographic dictionary maps boundary operators to bulk fields near the boundary relatively well, reconstructing local physics deep inside the bulk, particularly behind black hole horizons or near singularities, remains highly challenging.30 Questions persist about the uniqueness of the reconstruction and whether it depends on the specific state of the boundary theory. Understanding how an infalling observer’s experience is encoded in the boundary theory is a key aspect of resolving the information paradox and probing quantum gravity effects.48 - Nature of Time: As discussed, formulating a complete and consistent theory of emergent time within a holographic or background-independent framework is an ongoing effort.44 How does the subjective perception of a smooth, flowing time arise from discrete quantum informational processes? How is the “problem of time” in quantum gravity fully resolved? - Quantum Gravity Unification: The holographic principle provides constraints and guiding ideas, but it is not itself a complete theory of quantum gravity. Integrating holographic concepts fully and consistently into candidate theories like string theory or loop quantum gravity (LQG) remains a work in progress.8 There are attempts to bridge string theory and LQG ideas using holographic concepts, for example, by relating string theory on AdS to polymer-like structures reminiscent of LQG spin networks, potentially shedding light on singularities or the cosmological constant.36 However, fundamental differences between these approaches persist. - Conceptual Issues: The radical nature of holography and related ideas inevitably raises conceptual and philosophical questions. Some researchers question the validity of the thermodynamic arguments underpinning black hole entropy and holography.63 Interpretational issues related to emergent spacetime, observer dependence, and the potential “metaphysical baggage” associated with related quantum interpretations (like the Many-Worlds Interpretation, sometimes discussed alongside relative state formulations relevant to observer dependence) require careful consideration.12 (B) The Search for Experimental and Observational Evidence Perhaps the greatest challenge for the holographic principle is the difficulty of finding direct experimental or observational evidence. The principle’s effects are expected to become dominant at the Planck scale (around 10⁻³⁵ meters or 10¹⁹ GeV), energies far beyond the reach of current particle accelerators.28 Consequently, most evidence remains theoretical, based on consistency arguments and calculations within specific frameworks like AdS/CFT. - Direct Tests: Direct probes of Planck scale physics are currently impossible.65 Observations of phenomena like black holes or the early universe probe regimes where quantum gravity is important, but extracting unambiguous holographic signatures is extremely difficult, as current observations are typically well below the holographic information density limit.65 - Proposed Probes: Despite the challenges, several avenues are being explored to search for indirect or subtle signatures of holography: - Gravitational Wave Interferometers: Some proposals suggest that holographic effects might manifest as unexpected noise or correlations in highly sensitive gravitational wave detectors like LIGO/Virgo or future instruments.65 The idea, sometimes linked to concepts like “holographic noise,” is that fundamental limitations on spacetime information might lead to irreducible quantum fluctuations in spacetime geometry detectable by interferometers. However, the specific predictions are often model-dependent, and interpretations are highly debated.65 - Cosmological Observations: Researchers look for potential holographic imprints on the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation or the large-scale structure of the universe.40 Some emergent gravity or holographic cosmology models predict specific deviations from standard cosmology, such as anomalies in the CMB power spectrum or modifications to cosmic expansion history.40 - Black Hole Physics: Precision measurements of black holes offer another potential window. Subtle correlations hidden within Hawking radiation (if it could be detected), or specific features in the gravitational waveforms emitted during black hole mergers, might carry signatures of the holographic encoding of information.40 Testing the Page curve for black hole evaporation, which describes how entanglement entropy should evolve if information is preserved, is a key theoretical goal with potential observational consequences.40 - Tabletop and Analog Experiments: High-precision laboratory experiments using quantum optics, atomic systems, or condensed matter systems are being explored as “analog gravity” platforms.43 While these systems do not probe actual quantum gravity, they can be engineered to exhibit mathematical analogies to phenomena like Hawking radiation or even holographic duality (e.g., simulating MERA tensor networks 46). Such experiments can test the mathematical structures and conceptual ideas underlying holography in controlled settings. - Challenges: It must be emphasized that all current experimental proposals face significant hurdles. The expected signals are typically extremely small and difficult to disentangle from conventional physics, noise sources, or astrophysical uncertainties.65 Furthermore, many predictions rely on specific theoretical models of how holography manifests, making it hard to obtain model-independent tests of the principle itself. The lack of unequivocal observational data remains a critical issue constraining the development of quantum gravity and holographic theories.67 Given these difficulties, the most compelling support for holography currently comes from its theoretical consistency–its ability to resolve paradoxes like black hole information loss 1 and provide a framework for unifying gravity and quantum mechanics 4 –and its utility as a calculational tool via duality, enabling progress in understanding strongly coupled systems in otherwise inaccessible domains like nuclear and condensed matter physics.19 Progress in the field is also increasingly driven by cross-disciplinary approaches, integrating insights from quantum information theory (entanglement, complexity, error correction) 30, computer science, and foundational/philosophical studies on the nature of information, laws, and reality.12 ## VII. Synthesis: The Universe Quantified Holographically The holographic principle, born from the enigmatic thermodynamics of black holes and nurtured by the mathematical framework of string theory, offers a radically revised perspective on the quantification of physical reality. If correct, it necessitates fundamental shifts in our understanding of information, space, time, gravity, and the very laws that govern the cosmos. (A) Recapitulation of Quantitative Shifts The core quantitative reinterpretations mandated or strongly suggested by holography can be summarized as follows: - Information/Entropy: The most fundamental shift is the limitation of information content or entropy by boundary area (scaling as A/4Għ), rather than volume.1 This elevates information, measured in bits or entropy, to a primary constraining factor in physics, potentially preceding matter or energy configuration in the fundamental description. - Degrees of Freedom: Conventional local quantum field theories vastly overestimate the number of independent degrees of freedom in a region. Holography implies a drastic reduction, with the true fundamental degrees of freedom effectively residing on the boundary surface, scaling with its area.8 - Space: Space is demoted from a fundamental, pre-existing stage to an emergent construct. Its geometric properties (distance, area, volume, connectivity, possibly even dimensionality) are proposed to arise from the entanglement structure and complexity of underlying quantum information, quantified by relations like the Ryu-Takayanagi formula (S_EE = Area/4Għ) or tensor network models.30 - Time: Similar to space, time may not be fundamental. Its perceived flow and directionality are potentially emergent phenomena linked to the growth of quantum complexity (C(t) ≈ λt) or entanglement entropy in the evolving quantum state of the universe, possibly quantified holographically via conjectures like Complexity = Volume.44 - Gravity: Gravity may transition from being viewed as a fundamental force mediated by gravitons to an emergent thermodynamic or entropic phenomenon. Einstein’s field equations can be derived as an equation of state from the local application of thermodynamic principles (δQ=TdS) combined with the holographic entropy-area relation (S ∝ A).50 - Physical Laws: The laws of physics themselves might be reinterpreted not as immutable, infinitely precise Platonic truths, but as effective, approximate descriptions constrained by the finite information capacity of the universe. They could be emergent properties of the underlying informational substrate.57 (B) The Interconnectedness of Concepts A remarkable feature of the holographic paradigm is its power to weave together concepts from previously disparate areas of physics into a unified tapestry. Gravity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and information theory become deeply intertwined.8 Black hole thermodynamics reveals the entropy-area law (linking gravity, thermodynamics, and geometry). Quantum mechanics provides the framework for understanding entropy microscopically (as entanglement) and introduces effects like Hawking and Unruh radiation (linking QM, gravity, and thermodynamics). Information theory provides the language and quantitative tools (bits, entropy, complexity) to formulate the bounds and emergent properties. Holography acts as the synthesizing principle, suggesting that a fundamental description rooted in quantum information on boundaries can give rise to the emergent phenomena of gravity, spacetime, and thermodynamics in the bulk. Information appears to be the crucial link needed to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics. (C) Concluding Perspective The holographic principle stands as a profound and potentially revolutionary guidepost in the ongoing quest for a theory of quantum gravity. While significant theoretical challenges remain, particularly in extending its precise formulation beyond AdS spacetimes and in finding definitive experimental evidence, its conceptual power is undeniable. It compels us to question our deepest assumptions about the nature of space, time, and information. It suggests a universe where reality is fundamentally informational, where the richness of our three-dimensional world emerges from a lower-dimensional code, and where the laws of physics themselves are part of the physical, information-constrained system they describe. This perspective represents a potential paradigm shift away from the traditional reductionism based on local particles and fields towards a new form of reductionism based on information encoded on boundaries. Whether the universe is truly a hologram remains an open question, but exploring its possibility continues to generate deep insights into the fundamental structure of reality and the ultimate limits of quantification. The pursuit of understanding holography promises to remain a central theme in fundamental physics, pushing the boundaries of theoretical exploration and potentially revealing the ultimate nature of the cosmos. ### Works Cited 1. Holographic principle - Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645981879%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw17feqnuoNMGDkmjCZVJ9JY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073082&usg=AOvVaw3mCyRE3ir-0PdvJGmTIyG3) 2. Holographic principle - RYBN, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/IV.ALGORITHMS/QUANTUM_V/QUANTUM_PHYSICS/HOLOGRAPHIC_PRINCIPLE/Holographic_Principle.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/IV.ALGORITHMS/QUANTUM_V/QUANTUM_PHYSICS/HOLOGRAPHIC_PRINCIPLE/Holographic_Principle.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645982403%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Qu8GQadDWveGe1T0VJ6VW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073363&usg=AOvVaw3yfgQF7oJPGL7mYIpu3nFi) 3. What is Mathematical formulation of Holographic principle? - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/75260/what-is-mathematical-formulation-of-holographic-principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/75260/what-is-mathematical-formulation-of-holographic-principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645982897%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0nTol77xQbspRlSm1Vxm7M&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073478&usg=AOvVaw299-t_7xjTjU2WreHzmWtM) 4. Holographic Principle: Theory, Implications | Vaia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/math/theoretical-and-mathematical-physics/holographic-principle/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/math/theoretical-and-mathematical-physics/holographic-principle/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645983335%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2PflK0sn_ugk7NL725UbOR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073588&usg=AOvVaw1drMCs11uop5xzo54HUSqO) 5. The Holographic Universe - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.07258](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.07258%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645983647%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1t2yRrNXiH03gHykUZeSCu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073721&usg=AOvVaw2C5m9tKb4WcVo78NHO3mUq) 6. AdS/CFT Correspondence - beuke.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://beuke.org/ads-cft/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://beuke.org/ads-cft/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645983924%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1z7DD1c1FFovg-XAF21L6w&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073827&usg=AOvVaw0ahulrqS4-uODUC_prdwFE) 7. Black hole thermodynamics, quantum puzzles, and the holographic principle | Ro’s blog, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://rojefferson.blog/2020/03/07/black-hole-thermodynamics-quantum-puzzles-and-the-holographic-principle/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://rojefferson.blog/2020/03/07/black-hole-thermodynamics-quantum-puzzles-and-the-holographic-principle/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645984547%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0uyvOKFUqiVKlw08lK8YPH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646073950&usg=AOvVaw2jQyMliKGwaOwIfzN-l8Tu) 8. The holographic principle, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0203101](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0203101%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645985011%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw189xjVYnQIpD-Z9Z-w3-AN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074054&usg=AOvVaw3cQCEq_YJXIfOMcvM2Jp7m) 9. arxiv.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9911002](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9911002%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645985330%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1NJ2HSfFBPo9wO51bpNNqw&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074164&usg=AOvVaw30AMifY7qOu7TjMhonW-pf) 10. Beyond the Bekenstein Bound: Prime-Driven Structured Resonance as the Fundamental Ordering Principle of Information and Entropy - PhilArchive, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://philarchive.org/archive/BOSBTB](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philarchive.org/archive/BOSBTB%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645985679%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0oFH2Dy7lh1G6rc9GuNkjQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074339&usg=AOvVaw005w7uyIf_zGOlx9HvHxqp) 11. What are the implications of the Holographic principle? - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/79198/what-are-the-implications-of-the-holographic-principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/79198/what-are-the-implications-of-the-holographic-principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645986386%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1e0EWVXwE5WqTq9bj2oGtf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074439&usg=AOvVaw0bHPlW1VBcgRxG8yWphdC-) 12. An Interpretation of QM based on the Holographic Principle and M-Cosmology - PhilArchive, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://philarchive.org/archive/KURAIO-2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philarchive.org/archive/KURAIO-2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645986768%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2WO3fs81dKoNqhBJU2EwDU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074572&usg=AOvVaw2J_tOVEPgC6SOo9EUF7zYz) 13. Entropy Bounds: New Insights - MDPI, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/1/126](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/1/126%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645987158%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1kb-5XKsyDJcOZ1w79TO-g&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074681&usg=AOvVaw3ozSJngUsi1lAf41xg2UT7) 14. Application of holography to the black hole information problem - NHSJS, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://nhsjs.com/2022/application-of-holography-to-the-black-hole-information-problem/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://nhsjs.com/2022/application-of-holography-to-the-black-hole-information-problem/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645987535%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3rKC0djJPmigGOMdhHw6aP&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074778&usg=AOvVaw1E9ep8NN7oQ5IiDQZzst1B) 15. Entropy bounds and the holographic principle, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://static.ias.edu/pitp/archive/2011files/Bousso.slides.lectures7-28.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://static.ias.edu/pitp/archive/2011files/Bousso.slides.lectures7-28.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645987955%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3vkbo8Wo_mdEKJbzAjZbHC&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074902&usg=AOvVaw0s_MELUUyJRZbnRkyZLkpL) 16. A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics arXiv:1804.10610v1 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2018 - Indico Global, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://indico.global/event/6166/attachments/25565/44002/%5BWall%5D_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://indico.global/event/6166/attachments/25565/44002/%25255BWall%25255D_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645988572%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3srYrBl01XQFnFpHJGssfQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646074996&usg=AOvVaw0aZOsnNKqXhxAJGXk6gCgv) 17. Bekenstein bound - Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645988963%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0f5Qtbvy2pqUaQnaRa-vk1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075079&usg=AOvVaw0hcgHRC69AJMSb2IRloUAO) 18. Entropy Bounds, Holographic Principle and Uncertainty Relation - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9908047](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9908047%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645989379%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2vHj-cOBMOHRYKCauDplq8&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075168&usg=AOvVaw0BZNclH45cK_RAz-03pf-f) 19. AdS/CFT correspondence - Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645989670%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2sqUl2PVjDpCCSpSzJDv5p&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075247&usg=AOvVaw2JvjSpoCdi7yvgVV1XtHL7) 20. Bekenstein bound and an infinite universe - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/223170/bekenstein-bound-and-an-infinite-universe](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/223170/bekenstein-bound-and-an-infinite-universe%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645990173%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1PkNnhkn6UTBCvn0NsB6U9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075338&usg=AOvVaw347-Y5LbO-u5OiHG-4-nBO) 21. Covariant entropy bound beyond general relativity | Phys. Rev. D, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024002](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024002%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645990672%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3QwJ1mkvp7y6SWgASnJtpH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075430&usg=AOvVaw0RdIHHcPXzGTLBbgdwPuTr) 22. Black hole thermodynamics - Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645991062%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0k4bsGZfMUH-wwUBF0eRuY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075507&usg=AOvVaw24HIYppryG13qJPbwXmj_e) 23. Covariant entropy bound beyond general relativity, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/274752/1/PhysRevD.103.024002.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/274752/1/PhysRevD.103.024002.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645991596%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2dJRTv-4U7wQoFpGdFNV1o&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075633&usg=AOvVaw1cJrJfIc_au49aoXUqv2rV) 24. A proof of the Bekenstein bound for any strength of gravity through holography - Inspire HEP, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/literature/814531](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/literature/814531%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645992054%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ESv9zd_1nqnnRo1LZlXAP&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075727&usg=AOvVaw1I03sxnPnMU00EdwUagCzE) 25. Quantum Bousso bound - Harvard DASH, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://dash.harvard.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f96d7ae-daf8-4f8c-8fae-6177fbe1eb62/content](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://dash.harvard.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f96d7ae-daf8-4f8c-8fae-6177fbe1eb62/content%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645992554%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1hbcstgKCjor77T8Gz0Uub&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075797&usg=AOvVaw1kHrCTd5FA214whLlXeTWw) 26. How are Entanglement Entropies Related to Entropy Bounds? - Chapman University Digital Commons, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=philosophy_articles](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D1085%2526context%253Dphilosophy_articles%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645993251%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw27q5LFXpMg9pQaVWdGk-EX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075876&usg=AOvVaw0pwfDkvcNQmNajyO8FSCif) 27. A violation of the covariant entropy bound? - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084058](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084058%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645993744%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2QxvRDssOpqhkBPgrFhuVo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646075978&usg=AOvVaw34dZM7gsybMbd6w9wP7Wok) 28. Black holes and thermodynamics—The first half century - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.5127](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.5127%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645994127%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0II5AUPuCS0OZaYjiHywzF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076061&usg=AOvVaw2bRkNlSWvDQ2itSgmtLyDp) 29. Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for Gravity arXiv:1501.04278v2 [hep-th] 10 Sep 2015, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.04278](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.04278%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645994539%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1rojGCSpSOIK12e-Gxzr-7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076147&usg=AOvVaw2yh959UQrqBQI8Sy5S3O-2) 30. arxiv.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00007%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645994836%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2gBEHJsoCihF7vk2s3h69J&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076227&usg=AOvVaw0-HjtcOoqQFD8B1BBsNNb_) 31. Holography, Application, and String Theory’s Changing Nature - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.05159](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.05159%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645995216%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3796duWkiSsEfD0IfBInVi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076323&usg=AOvVaw0KpvKRrlIii3ltL6KGHQxT) 32. Gauge/Gravity Duality, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.fhassler.de/teaching/ws_24/ads_cft](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.fhassler.de/teaching/ws_24/ads_cft%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645995553%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3tOKHFFeYtXVnmdoEBmlb1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076434&usg=AOvVaw3OZymbMsI0EKNr4VIOYEEI) 33. Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT - SISSA, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.sissa.it/tpp/phdsection/OnlineResources/16/SISSA_AdSCFT_course2022.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.sissa.it/tpp/phdsection/OnlineResources/16/SISSA_AdSCFT_course2022.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645996043%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1wJ3KT1vOUB40PrLw1eSxJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076509&usg=AOvVaw1GYop9SLKWD-JP8uMr8FPc) 34. Geometry and entanglement in AdS/CFT and beyond Chang-Han Chen - DSpace@MIT, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/145156/Chen-cchan725-SB-physics-2022-Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/145156/Chen-cchan725-SB-physics-2022-Thesis.pdf?sequence%253D1%2526isAllowed%253Dy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645996664%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3W-G3CIPinYYo-EvuS_94r&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076621&usg=AOvVaw06pJuilCaLsIcPCHJVCgBx) 35. Spacetime and gravity’s emergence from eternally entangled particles - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/physics/0107050v13](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/physics/0107050v13%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645997122%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1LxUdTUQmRa2iD3uNcOlPe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076830&usg=AOvVaw20ADRM4FaQXADjDfYBEN_Y) 36. A note on the AdS/CFT correspondence and the nature of spacetime in quantum gravity., accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2312.05260v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2312.05260v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645997548%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2pQlfLnZ9r8waXbiUwaff9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646076931&usg=AOvVaw1nZdqMvj0sgukZRhXZcwd4) 37. The Semiclassical Approximation: Its Application to Holography and the Information Paradox - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.08116](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.08116%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645997997%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0KQJWcV2DN2kuNTesTC2S2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077029&usg=AOvVaw0VJ9ocvXrwXVh95GQx356b) 38. How does one start a journey to understand the AdS/CFT Correspondence Principle, and what are the pre-requisites for the same? | ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_one_start_a_journey_to_understand_the_AdS_CFT_Correspondence_Principle_and_what_are_the_pre-requisites_for_the_same](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_one_start_a_journey_to_understand_the_AdS_CFT_Correspondence_Principle_and_what_are_the_pre-requisites_for_the_same%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645998818%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1RcxyyK8pLDIXReEOTpxPI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077126&usg=AOvVaw3d97hTnyuVoAl79XAxXPzl) 39. arXiv:physics/0107050v13 [physics.gen-ph] 20 May 2024, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0107050](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0107050%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645999138%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2LFPikHX7trJzN04N8Qlu5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077228&usg=AOvVaw1H8d583hR4EJD1GsEscXPJ) 40. 1 Introduction - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2504.00039v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2504.00039v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645999355%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1v1cbNvIP8OACSc1WgjdTT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077314&usg=AOvVaw30bET7EAm8gT5eFFzRnKgu) 41. Quantum Gravity: Has Spacetime Quantum Properties? 1 - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.0190](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.0190%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645999571%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2bdks-b6gBL_TcOhCTAm4X&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077412&usg=AOvVaw23E0KR8-vjYpP2AeKzXQN3) 42. AdS/CFT Duality and the Emergence of Spacetime. - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259158224_AdSCFT_Duality_and_the_Emergence_of_Spacetime](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/259158224_AdSCFT_Duality_and_the_Emergence_of_Spacetime%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429645999937%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0XPwvkHg0JLypHATk6abM5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077524&usg=AOvVaw2UI9iVAaFaSfrBWGwZFSja) 43. It From Qubit: Spacetime Emergence from Quantum Entanglement - Inspire HEP, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/files/d64c391f3aa408496952d4b533442b5b](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/files/d64c391f3aa408496952d4b533442b5b%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646000395%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VmCZ0Y6Fb_VetuuAcrAld&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077621&usg=AOvVaw0pOJxAXKt6sgcOaD2Bu8P5) 44. The Emergence of Time from Quantum Information Dynamics - Scientific Research, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.scirp.org/pdf/jhepgc2024104_352181141.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.scirp.org/pdf/jhepgc2024104_352181141.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646000798%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0W7WJk-viDtw6Q1sxo2Ovh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077716&usg=AOvVaw0h-SsPpphNvU5-vhZGgD1h) 45. The Emergence of Time from Quantum Information Dynamics - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380668546_The_Emergence_of_Time_from_Quantum_Information_Dynamics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/380668546_The_Emergence_of_Time_from_Quantum_Information_Dynamics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646001299%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3c8BPkKqhnGXfUviTM9nVi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077807&usg=AOvVaw0yADorRmf3xK6RO0N_d43W) 46. Emergent Holographic Forces from Tensor Networks and Criticality - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2401.13595v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2401.13595v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646001730%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3j57DoHIyO6ZC9g0YzdlO5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646077935&usg=AOvVaw0BK7eNq-odJjuY_wGr-Pd9) 47. The Emergence of Time from Quantum Information Dynamics, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=137035](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid%253D137035%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646002169%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw39h1Ufkm9bDEjHWOpDRk13&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078038&usg=AOvVaw1IoofczLo7fjS9ItasRQSp) 48. John Preskill “Holographic Quantum Codes” - YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt7RVwIFIaY](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v%253DBt7RVwIFIaY%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646002505%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2ogwK_QEgejR_dAZUtqOmD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078135&usg=AOvVaw1ibT78XVjUJ6WXV9NOGF0d) 49. On the Nature and Origin of the Higgs Mechanism - Inspire HEP, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/files/86e48ebca26ad2d7e8bfbdb93c129081](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/files/86e48ebca26ad2d7e8bfbdb93c129081%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646002774%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2phgiEyDtvUsRF-tf-zU3X&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078242&usg=AOvVaw0bNDyawrwn1tP1pBiWRSnY) 50. Holographic Space-Time and Quantum Information - Frontiers, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00111/full](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00111/full%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646003090%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3R7PXSdfVzywAwT9wDGJ9L&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078342&usg=AOvVaw1D73lcZBBHGdhw1lT3ze8I) 51. 13 Spacetime thermodynamics and Einstein’s equations - OIST Groups |, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://groups.oist.jp/system/files/Lecture_13.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://groups.oist.jp/system/files/Lecture_13.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646003584%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1yrOm7MKFJYJ6NI54ID2iH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078407&usg=AOvVaw3XA6oVkxhKtr_IQ5gO4jIM) 52. Guest Post: Grant Remmen on Entropic Gravity - Preposterous Universe, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2016/02/08/guest-post-grant-remmen-on-entropic-gravity/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2016/02/08/guest-post-grant-remmen-on-entropic-gravity/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646003970%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0M0bI7dJZnhhxeaRe68aYW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078498&usg=AOvVaw0ppJBK7lqG1m2LYrdfoF1W) 53. arxiv.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9504004](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9504004%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646004177%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw17UbX5zA6_H6KLmpKLlcIq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078606&usg=AOvVaw1-TjxIi7Y_5AZYhpQqTviU) 54. (PDF) Einstein Equations From Holographic Thermodynamics and Holographic Entropy, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228102865_Einstein_Equations_From_Holographic_Thermodynamics_and_HolographicEntropy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/228102865_Einstein_Equations_From_Holographic_Thermodynamics_and_HolographicEntropy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646004614%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3T10jylL8PeJ67JNQPB8xB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078705&usg=AOvVaw0a45h0DVXmhU8Xom3iIIfr) 55. What’s the field of non stringy quantum gravity research looking like right now? - Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1ig2nqa/whats_the_field_of_non_stringy_quantum_gravity/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1ig2nqa/whats_the_field_of_non_stringy_quantum_gravity/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646004995%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Dws-YfQKtlOOBfq9lfYkd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078824&usg=AOvVaw2b7yj2Ykl5f-RSMRIq0tKD) 56. f(R) Gravity and Maxwell Equations from the Holographic Principle - Inspire HEP, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/literature/888779](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/literature/888779%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646005295%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw18s7Ot4er1A0RP6h4N9GcT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646078937&usg=AOvVaw0McbK93726GB4p_k2SS-3j) 57. arxiv.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0703041](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0703041%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646005488%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3BtYnLNuhlENQRCzU2W7Do&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079028&usg=AOvVaw3Jqpjr1CyjtSxK_1b91rJ-) 58. (PDF) Modal Fields Theory A Complete Reconstruction of Physical Law - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390406402_Modal_Fields_Theory_A_Complete_Reconstruction_of_Physical_Law](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/390406402_Modal_Fields_Theory_A_Complete_Reconstruction_of_Physical_Law%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646006101%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2CorBQtPb7_NgqG61Qit3U&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079126&usg=AOvVaw3qgBap1wLC7nCr8Tgp3Y6O) 59. An Acataleptic Universe - arXiv, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.6728](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.6728%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646006453%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1aZagbM5bD8Ft7jaKjk34R&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079237&usg=AOvVaw0UY9gigRFRu6uazzKaxJHp) 60. Holography in a background-independent effective theory - World Scientific Publishing, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S0219887815500759?download=true](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S0219887815500759?download%253Dtrue%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646007060%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2-IL5UQ3R0H8nOpWu97gSI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079319&usg=AOvVaw08zLajSFisNsKaIxHMt1al) 61. A Dual-Holographic Cosmology: A Conceptual Bridge Between Entropic Gravity and Quantum Geometry - viXra.org, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://vixra.org/pdf/2503.0173v1.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://vixra.org/pdf/2503.0173v1.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646007590%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1RNIXIty0ZcHLVxwzWJ3ZM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079447&usg=AOvVaw3VNcBDE9I4bBi5Ldy_rEwT) 62. The Holographic Universe | Jean-Pierre Luminet - Inference Review, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://inference-review.com/article/the-holographic-universe](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inference-review.com/article/the-holographic-universe%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646008090%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw12GjTtf_ZxNtHRbcA7G1a2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079554&usg=AOvVaw2dOQ3Y7yuDwpmPQNG_ReyS) 63. Fake Physics: Black Hole Thermodynamics, The Holographic Principle and Emergent Gravity - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314574978_Fake_Physics_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics_The_Holographic_Principle_and_Emergent_Gravity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/314574978_Fake_Physics_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics_The_Holographic_Principle_and_Emergent_Gravity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646008577%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3E0FcmjLCd1x5QfijxcOHK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079700&usg=AOvVaw3QKVLRARVt_jzREMGLpFR6) 64. Misleading Concepts in Quantum Gravity: Black Hole Thermodynamics and The Holographic Principle - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280491690_Misleading_Concepts_in_Quantum_Gravity_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics_and_The_Holographic_Principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/280491690_Misleading_Concepts_in_Quantum_Gravity_Black_Hole_Thermodynamics_and_The_Holographic_Principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646009271%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lpFfPUbE_sLvS6Rgkw1wg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079830&usg=AOvVaw1pSm5Mi1hA529pMCkc72AR) 65. Why do some scientists believe that our universe is a hologram?, accessed April 12, 2025, [http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/why-do-some-scientists-think-that-our.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/why-do-some-scientists-think-that-our.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646009772%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw08MGe9dsGndo6GfePEFtXP&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646079947&usg=AOvVaw0AU2znZhMC5Ol0jC-BKJcg) 66. The Holographic Principle - ResearchGate, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2052783_The_Holographic_Principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/2052783_The_Holographic_Principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646010223%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0fxP9pjvNfL6Gu42dIPU2t&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080063&usg=AOvVaw1Q9uexWK2bDMdHPeN6982e) 67. Defining a crisis: The roles of principles in the search for a theory of quantum gravity - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15053/1/Crowther%20-%20defining%20a%20crisis.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15053/1/Crowther%252520-%252520defining%252520a%252520crisis.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646010817%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3WRzbIlX62grq3TPYv6a7X&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080204&usg=AOvVaw30fs71ShJSYxjRJIHQ1kdB) 68. Holographic consciousness - Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_consciousness](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_consciousness%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646011296%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1XLJwMRZCfiKk8XTAd_sPR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080318&usg=AOvVaw1VcFmxGUxsC55AX75Jdo-v) 69. Beyond the Surface: New Dimensions of the Holographic Universe and Human Perception, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387222136_Beyond_the_Surface_New_Dimensions_of_the_Holographic_Universe_and_Human_Perception](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/387222136_Beyond_the_Surface_New_Dimensions_of_the_Holographic_Universe_and_Human_Perception%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646012036%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2i-HBmfBaJPd1f3QovgH13&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080448&usg=AOvVaw0RkdefPGesU6bC8qWyfx_D) 70. Holographic Quantum Theory of Consciousness - Article (Preprint v2) by Zhigang Sha et al. | Qeios, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://www.qeios.com/read/KULKA0.2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.qeios.com/read/KULKA0.2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646012500%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw20GuKt8jVr-ikjcvdNURye&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080553&usg=AOvVaw3UDhPQ9yVNDdJ4a-gRqNeC) 71. The Holographic Principle of Mind and the Evolution of Consciousness - Digital Commons @ CIIS, accessed April 12, 2025, [https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=cejournal](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D1031%2526context%253Dcejournal%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744429646013095%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Jyv3ADSeJljHQR0Uxn0hK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744429646080626&usg=AOvVaw1LlHeB_ZLY6vVhn-VmCd1S)