Quick read
NUMERATA: A Multi-Axis Framework for Evaluating Numeral Systems
In the paper's words
NUMERATA v2.0 extends the 8-axis framework with Distinction-Based Primality (WP0.3/9th axis) and meta-analysis validation (MCS=0.875, 5/5 predictions confirmed). Sunburst notation makes primality visually immediate.
The abstract, verbatim, and its opening sentence is the claim. Every line below is quoted from the text.
Numbers it reports
The scoring rubric is validated through inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.80 target) and factor analysis ($\geq 3$ independent factors predicted).
from 3.3 Scoring Rubric
How it is done
Then we tested whether our nine yardsticks give different rankings than the speed-only approach.
from Simplified AbstractMost people never ask whether the numeral system they use could be better designed.
from 1.1 The Evaluation ProblemThis reframes the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Every composite score decomposes uniquely into a canonical polyrhythm of prime meters.
from 2.4.3 Primality RedefinedDimension Container View (Set Theory) Distinction View (DCN) Number Nested set of sets Sequence of indications Multiplication Cartesian product of container sizes Counterpoint/canon of rhythms Primality Indivisible box (no proper divisors) Metrically irreducible rhythm Factorization Partition of container contents Decomposition of polyrhythm Fundamental Theorem Unique container decomposition Unique prime rhythm decomposition Neither view is "correct" — they make different properties cognitively accessible.
from 2.4.4 The Container View vs. The Distinction View
What would falsify it
The distinction/containment axis is not just descriptive — it predicts which cognitive operations a system makes natural versus effortful.
from 2.2 Distinction vs. Containment (WP0.2)Phase 0-1 Prediction Meta-Analysis Finding Confirmed?
from 6.5 Five of Five Predictions Confirmed
Where the claim stops
A prime number is a score that cannot be so arranged.
from 2.4.3 Primality RedefinedHowever, only 4 of 9 axes have sufficient comparative data in the existing literature.
from 7.1 The Framework Is Validated But Data-Limited
Where to read
- Abstract205 words · 1 min
- Simplified Abstract132 words · 1 min
- 1. Introduction371 words · 2 min
- 2. Foundations836 words · 4 min
- 3. Structural Typology (WP1.3.2)299 words · 1 min
- 4. Edge Cases and Hidden Assumptions (WP1.1.3+WP1.3)239 words · 1 min
- 5. Case Study: The Sunburst Notation512 words · 2 min
- 6. Meta-Analysis Validation — Phase 2b461 words · 2 min
- 7. Discussion257 words · 1 min
- 8. Conclusion130 words · 1 min
- Appendix A: Deliverables78 words · 1 min
- Appendix B: QNFO Silent Radix Prior Art27 words · 1 min
Read from the paper itself: 46 sections, 3,575 words. Nothing on this page is written by a model; a line that is not a sentence of the paper is not shown. Have a specific question? Ask this paper.