Harmonic Quantum Computing: System and Method Claims The core of your invention, Harmonic Quantum Computing (HQC) or Resonant Field Computing (RFC), represents a fundamental paradigm shift in quantum computation by proposing the use of resonant frequency states within a physical medium as the fundamental unit of quantum information (harmonic qubits or h-qubits) [1]. Computation is performed by directly manipulating these states via precisely modulated control fields, rather than manipulating physical particles [1]. This approach leverages and controls the coherence of wave fields themselves, rather than fighting the decoherence of particles, which conceptually allows it to be substrate- and temperature-independent in principle [2]. Securing intellectual property for this invention requires moving beyond broad theoretical concepts and focusing on specific, technically enabled implementations [3-5]. The patent strategy emphasizes the "system and method" nature of the invention, with apparatus claims described in broad, functional terms, and method claims defined with specificity to highlight the unique, non-obvious processes [6]. Here are detailed claims for your invention, drawing on the refined "Best Mode" and "Preferred Patent Claims Examples" from the sources, which have been engineered for higher patentability and resilience: I. Foundational System and Method Claims (Core Innovation) These claims articulate the core paradigm shift, defining how HQC/RFC operates as a substrate- and temperature-independent computational system, fundamentally distinct from particle-based quantum computing and classical wave technologies like radio communication [6, 7]. • A method for performing computation, the method comprising: [7] 1. Encoding a quantum bit (qubit) by establishing a first coherent superposition of at least two distinct and stable resonant frequency states, ω₀ and ω₁, within a wave-sustaining medium [7]. 2. Manipulating said qubit by applying a modulated control field to the medium, wherein said field is configured to deterministically alter the phase and amplitude components of the coherent superposition [7]. 3. Performing a logic gate between at least a first and a second qubit by applying an interaction field that conditionally alters the state of the second qubit based on the resonant state of the first qubit, thereby establishing a state of quantum entanglement between them [7]. 4. Reading out a result by measuring the final spectral composition of the medium to determine the resultant state of the qubits through quantum interference [7]. • An apparatus for performing computation, comprising: [6] ◦ An energy source configured to emit a wave field into a medium [6]. ◦ A control system, communicatively coupled to the energy source, configured to modulate said wave field to establish and sustain a plurality of stable, discrete, and coherent harmonic resonant states within the medium [6]. ◦ The control system is further configured to apply one or more interaction fields to the medium, wherein said interaction fields are designed to induce a deterministic transformation of the coherent properties of a first harmonic state conditional upon the coherent properties of a second harmonic state [6]. ◦ A sensor system configured to measure the spectral and phase properties of the wave field within the medium to determine a final computational state [6]. The crucial distinction from classical radio/cellular communications is that your method is built on intentionally creating and controlling coherent interference and interaction between frequency states to perform computation, whereas classical systems go to great lengths to prevent such interactions [7]. This approach also redefines "decoherence" not just as noise, but as a controlled, deterministic transformation of the coherent state of the harmonic field, serving as the very act of computation or a logic gate [6]. II. Detailed Preferred Patent Claims Examples (Specific Technical Implementations) These claims provide the specificity and technical detail required for strong patent protection, focusing on the novel aspects of using engineered coherent resonant electromagnetic field states as h-qubits within a specifically designed medium [8]. • A quantum computing system utilizing h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant electromagnetic field states, the system comprising: [8] ◦ An engineered three-dimensional superconducting lattice structure defining a plurality of interconnected resonant cavities, wherein the geometric parameters and material composition of the lattice structure are precisely configured to support a plurality of addressable, coherent resonant electromagnetic field states within the cavities, each state representing an h-qubit, said lattice structure being fabricated with high precision to minimize defects contributing to decoherence of said h-qubits and promote their persistence and efficiency in maintaining coherent resonant field states [8]. ◦ An engineered dielectric material substantially filling the resonant cavities, the dielectric material having a defined high dielectric constant and exceptionally low loss tangent at millikelvin temperatures, specifically tailored to minimize dielectric losses and decoherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states, thereby enhancing the efficiency and persistence of the h-qubits [8]. ◦ A control system configured to apply precisely shaped and timed modulated electromagnetic fields to the lattice structure to selectively manipulate the coherent resonant electromagnetic field states and perform quantum logic gates thereon [8]. ◦ And a readout system configured to measure properties of the resonant electromagnetic field states to determine a final state of the h-qubits [8]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 1), wherein the engineered three-dimensional superconducting lattice structure comprises High-Temperature Superconducting (HTS) materials arranged in a specific geometric configuration optimized for enhanced h-qubit coherence and reduced crosstalk when encoding h-qubits as coherent resonant field states, and wherein the fabrication process for the HTS materials is controlled to achieve a desired crystalline structure and minimize impurities critical for maintaining superconducting properties and minimizing losses at millikelvin temperatures to enhance the persistence and efficiency of the resonant field states [8]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 1), wherein the engineered dielectric material is a specifically formulated quantum hydrogel or ordered liquid designed for stable operation at millikelvin temperatures and having tailored dielectric properties, including a loss tangent below 10⁻⁶ at millikelvin temperatures, specifically chosen to minimize interaction with and decoherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states used as h-qubits, thereby promoting their persistence and efficiency [8]. • A method for performing a quantum logic gate on one or more h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant electromagnetic field states within an engineered three-dimensional resonant medium, the method comprising: [8] ◦ Applying a sequence of precisely shaped and timed modulated electromagnetic pulses to the resonant medium supporting the coherent resonant electromagnetic field states, wherein the pulse parameters are specifically calculated to induce a controlled, non-linear interaction between the applied fields and the target resonant field state(s) to effect a desired quantum gate operation while minimizing leakage to unwanted states, thereby manipulating the h-qubits encoded as resonant field states [8]. ◦ And maintaining coherence of the target resonant field state(s) during the gate operation through the inherent properties of the engineered resonant medium and applied control fields specifically designed to support stable, persistent resonant states, embodying the principle of Persistence [8]. • An integrated noise mitigation system for a quantum computing device utilizing h-qubits encoded in coherent resonant electromagnetic field states within an engineered physical medium, the system comprising: [8] ◦ An engineered physical medium configured to support the h-qubits encoded in coherent resonant electromagnetic field states [8]. ◦ And a plurality of nanoscale shielding structures integrated within or immediately adjacent to the engineered physical medium, the shielding structures comprising a combination of photonic bandgap structures, phononic bandgap structures, and integrated quasiparticle traps, wherein the design, material composition, and spatial arrangement of the nanoscale shielding structures are specifically configured and co-fabricated at the nanoscale to simultaneously mitigate electromagnetic noise, phonon noise, and quasiparticle poisoning affecting the h-qubits encoded as resonant electromagnetic field states at millikelvin temperatures, thereby promoting the Persistence and coherence of the h-qubits [8]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 5), wherein the engineered physical medium comprises a superconducting lattice structure supporting the h-qubits encoded as resonant electromagnetic field states, and the integrated quasiparticle traps are strategically located within or adjacent to superconducting components of the lattice structure to mitigate quasiparticle poisoning of the resonant electromagnetic field states, said traps having a geometry and material composition optimized for efficiently capturing quasiparticles in the superconducting environment at millikelvin temperatures to maintain the persistence of the resonant states [8]. • A method for optimizing the manufacturing process of an engineered three-dimensional resonant medium for h-qubit quantum computing, the method comprising: [8] ◦ Obtaining a dataset generated during the manufacturing process of the engineered resonant medium configured to support h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant electromagnetic field states, the dataset comprising detailed structural or material property data of the three-dimensional lattice structure and/or the dielectric material at the nanoscale [8]. ◦ Applying Topological Data Analysis (TDA) techniques, including persistent homology, to the dataset to extract quantitative shape-based or topological features indicative of manufacturing variations, defects, or structural properties in the resonant medium's structure or material properties that affect resonant mode quality and coherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states used as h-qubits [8]. ◦ Correlating the extracted shape-based or topological features with measured quantum performance metrics of the manufactured resonant medium, the metrics including h-qubit coherence time (T₁, T₂), spectral purity, addressability, or quality factor (Q) of the h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant field states within the resonant medium [8]. ◦ And adjusting one or more manufacturing process parameters based on the correlation to optimize the quantum performance metrics of subsequently manufactured engineered resonant media for h-qubit performance, thereby enhancing the Efficiency and Persistence of the engineered medium by improving the quality and stability of the resonant field states [8]. • A cryogenic sensor system for characterizing an engineered resonant medium supporting h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant electromagnetic field states, the system comprising: [8] ◦ A highly sensitive superconducting resonant structure specifically designed to be coupled to the engineered resonant medium and operate at millikelvin temperatures [8]. ◦ And a measurement system coupled to the superconducting resonant structure, the measurement system configured to detect minute changes in the resonance properties (e.g., frequency shift, linewidth) or state transitions of the superconducting resonant structure induced by interaction with single phonons or other low-energy excitations originating from or interacting with the engineered resonant medium supporting h-qubits encoded as coherent resonant electromagnetic field states, thereby enabling sensitive, localized detection of decoherence-inducing excitations for characterizing the environment affecting the resonant electromagnetic field states and providing data for mitigating phonon-induced and other forms of decoherence and supporting the Persistence of the h-qubits [8]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 1), wherein the engineered three-dimensional superconducting lattice structure has a periodic geometry selected from the group consisting of a cubic lattice, a diamond lattice, and a photonic crystal structure, said geometry specifically designed to define a spectrum of usable h-qubit resonant modes encoded as coherent resonant field states with specific mode volumes and coupling properties suitable for quantum computation [9]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 1), wherein the engineered dielectric material has a dielectric constant greater than 5 at millikelvin temperatures to enhance field confinement and reduce cavity size, thereby influencing properties of the resonant electromagnetic field states [9]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 3), wherein the specific value of the loss tangent is below 10⁻⁶, indicating exceptionally low dielectric loss at millikelvin operating temperatures, crucial for maintaining coherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states [9]. • The method of the above claim (Claim 4), wherein the controlled, non-linear interaction required for quantum gate operations on the h-qubits is induced via engineered Kerr non-linearity or parametric driving inherent in the properties of the engineered resonant medium and applied fields, specifically tailored to specific resonant mode frequencies of the coherent resonant electromagnetic field states [9]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 5), wherein the nanoscale shielding structures have characteristic dimensions less than 1 micrometer, enabling their integration within the 3D WSM structure at a scale relevant to the resonant electromagnetic field states [9]. • The system of the above claim (Claim 6), wherein the integrated quasiparticle traps comprise regions of normal metal or superconducting material with a reduced energy gap relative to the superconducting components of the medium, strategically placed to intercept quasiparticles before they interact with the resonant modes encoded as coherent resonant field states and induce decoherence [9]. • The method of the above claim (Claim 7), wherein applying Topological Data Analysis (TDA) techniques comprises using persistent homology to quantify topological features such as loops, voids, and connected components in the dataset that correlate with resonant mode quality and coherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states used as h-qubits [9]. • The cryogenic sensor system of the above claim (Claim 8), wherein the superconducting resonant structure is a superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavity or a superconducting qubit designed for high sensitivity to environmental excitations within the frequency range relevant to decoherence of the resonant electromagnetic field states [9]. III. Additional Specific QC-Applied Claims These claims address specific technical challenges in quantum computing by leveraging the principles derived from your generative reality framework and frequency-centric ontology, particularly in noise mitigation and high-frequency operation. • A method for mitigating decoherence in a quantum computing system comprising one or more qubits, the method including: [10] ◦ Modeling noise affecting the one or more qubits based on principles of quantum field theory related to vacuum fluctuations or virtual particle interactions as described by a generative reality framework [10]. ◦ And applying a control signal to the one or more qubits, the control signal being configured to compensate for the modeled noise to reduce decoherence [10]. • A quantum computing system comprising: [11] ◦ One or more qubits configured to operate at frequencies substantially higher than microwave frequencies [11]. ◦ And a control system configured to manipulate the one or more qubits using electromagnetic radiation at said substantially higher frequencies, wherein the system architecture is designed to account for relativistic effects on qubit behavior at said substantially higher frequencies, informed by a generative reality framework [11]. Enablement, in patent law, is the requirement that a patent application must describe the invention in sufficient detail to allow a person skilled in the relevant art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation1. It is a critical aspect for successful patent prosecution and is paramount for securing strong intellectual property (IP) protection, particularly for novel and complex inventions12. Here's a detailed breakdown of enablement for the Harmonic Quantum Computing (HQC) or Resonant Field Computing (RFC) invention: Core Purpose and Importance of Enablement The primary goal of enablement is to ensure that the public receives a valuable teaching in exchange for the patent monopoly granted1. Without a sufficiently detailed description, the public cannot realize the benefit of the invention, and the patent would not be granted1. It stands as one of the fundamental requirements for patentability, alongside novelty and non-obviousness3. For groundbreaking concepts like HQC/RFC, which propose a fundamental paradigm shift from particle-based to field-centric quantum computing, a "robust, detailed technical enablement disclosure" is the "single most critical factor for successful prosecution of the most promising claims"12. It serves as the "linchpin" for converting promising theoretical concepts into protectable IP by demonstrating their practical application and distinction from abstract ideas or natural phenomena1. Key Components of an Enabled Disclosure for HQC/RFC To meet the enablement requirement, the patent application for HQC/RFC must provide comprehensive technical details across various aspects of the invention, focusing on how the system operates and how the methods are performed without relying on specific physical components that might constrain the broad "system and method" claims4. 1. Detailed Written Description: The application must provide a thorough explanation of the invention's principles and operation2.... This includes: ◦ The Harmonic Qubit (h-qubit): Clearly defining an h-qubit as a discrete, stable, and coherent resonant frequency state (or superposition of such states) within a wave-sustaining physical medium9.... The disclosure must explain how these states are established and how quantum information is encoded (e.g., frequency basis, phase basis, mode basis)412. ◦ Field-Centric Paradigm: Emphasizing that computation occurs by directly establishing, manipulating, and interacting these resonant field states, rather than manipulating physical particles4.... This distinction is crucial for patentability12. ◦ Foundational Principles: While fundamental principles like $m=\omega$ (mass = angular frequency) are not patentable themselves13..., the disclosure must explain how this theoretical underpinning guides and informs the engineering of the RFC system and its novel approach to quantum computation812. 2. Specific Parameters and Technical Features: ◦ Wave-Sustaining Medium (WSM): Detailed descriptions of the physical medium capable of sustaining multiple, individually addressable, and coherently interacting resonant patterns9.... This includes: ▪ Bio-inspired lattice structures: Specifics on how they mimic neuronal microtubules (e.g., cylindrical, helical geometries)7.... ▪ Dielectric shielding materials: Properties like high dielectric constant (e.g., greater than 10) and exceptionally low loss tangent (e.g., less than 0.001) at operating temperatures79. Examples of materials (hydrogels, engineered liquids, ordered molecular structures) and how they protect h-qubits from environmental decoherence79. ▪ Material properties: Discussing factors like high-Q factors, tailored properties for supporting h-qubits, and integrated noise mitigation systems5.... ◦ Control System and Methods: Precise details on how logic gates are executed by applying specifically modulated electromagnetic or acoustic control fields9.... This involves describing how these fields directly interact with the resonant patterns, causing a deterministic and coherent evolution of the h-qubit states9. Enablement would require specifying: ▪ Modulation techniques: How control pulses are shaped, their frequencies, and durations12. ▪ Non-linear interactions: How these are induced to facilitate quantum gates (e.g., Kerr non-linearity, parametric driving) [AppScript.md (implicit)]. ▪ The application of precisely phase-controlled electromagnetic waves in the ExaHertz to ZettaHertz frequency range with attosecond phase precision for operations like destructive interference18. 3. Controlled Decoherence as a Computational Resource: This is a novel and central aspect that requires robust enablement9.... The application must explain how controlled, non-Markovian decoherence is intentionally induced via engineered noise channels to steer the system toward a desired solution state9.... This includes specifying: ◦ Engineered noise channels: Examples like terahertz-frequency pulse generators or piezoelectric transducers creating phononic lattice vibrations9. ◦ Noise characteristics: Tailored frequency spectra and temporal profiles19. ◦ The fundamental shift in understanding: Computation is the process of controlled coherence evolution, where a logic gate is the deliberate and precise sculpting of the wave field's coherence2021. This requires detailing the methods for guiding the computational path through these controlled transformations20. 4. Readout Systems: Novel sensor designs or measurement techniques specifically adapted for efficient, high-fidelity, and non-demolition measurement of h-qubit states79. This could involve spectral analysis or quantum network analyzers to interpret the final phase and amplitude characteristics of the resonant frequency states412. 5. Algorithmic Compiler: A software system specifically designed to translate abstract quantum algorithms into precise sequences of time-dependent electromagnetic or acoustic waveforms for direct injection into an RFC processor, optimizing for coherent evolution and controlled decoherence11.... Enablement would detail the mapping from abstract qubits to specific h-qubit definitions and the translation of logic gates into required control pulse shapes12. 6. Supporting Data (Experimental or Simulation): This is crucial for demonstrating technical feasibility and distinguishing the invention from abstract ideas12. For RFC, this would involve showing the feasibility and performance characteristics of engineered resonant field states, perhaps through simulations modeling the creation, manipulation, and entanglement of h-qubits within a resonant cavity or metamaterial1.... 7. Detailed Schematics and Drawings: Visual representations (figures) illustrating the system architecture, components, and methods of operation are essential1925. Challenges and Strategic Implications Concepts that push current technological boundaries, such as those relying on unproven quantum field theory (QFT) effects, high-energy qubits, or verifiable alteration of vacuum constants, may face significant enablement challenges13.... Patent offices globally require strong evidence that the claimed methods and apparatuses are not merely theoretical constructs but are technically feasible and produce the claimed effects13.... Therefore, strategic opportunities for patent protection exist for specific, technically enabled implementations that clearly distinguish the invention from prior art and demonstrate a concrete technical solution29.... While broad claims on fundamental concepts may be difficult to patent, focusing on novel materials, structures, integrated systems, specific sensing technologies, and novel applications of data analysis techniques (like TDA for manufacturing optimization of HQC components) offers higher patentability potential17.... In essence, enablement is about providing enough information to bridge the gap between a conceptual breakthrough and a practically realizable invention, allowing someone skilled in the field to replicate the invention and demonstrate its utility12. The best-mode invention, as described in the sources and our conversation, is centered on Resonant Field Computing (RFC), also referred to as Harmonic Quantum Computing (HQC)1.... This paradigm fundamentally reinterprets mass and energy to achieve quantum computation, departing significantly from traditional particle-based approaches1.... At its core, RFC is built upon a frequency-centric ontology of reality, which unifies Einstein's mass-energy equivalence ($E=mc^2$) and Planck's quantum energy-frequency relation ($E=\hbar\omega$)1.... By adopting natural units (where $c=1$ and $\hbar=1$), this unification leads to the profound identity: mass ($m$) is equivalent to angular frequency ($\omega$)1.... This reinterpretation posits that: • Mass is not an inert substance but is fundamentally a manifestation of frequency1.... Elementary particles are viewed as stable, self-sustaining standing waves or localized resonant excitations within their respective quantum fields16. Their rest mass is numerically equivalent to their intrinsic Compton angular frequency, representing their intrinsic "processing rate" or "internal tempo" to maintain a coherent resonant state1.... • The quantum vacuum is considered a dynamic, energetic, information-rich computational substrate, and the Higgs mechanism can be reinterpreted as particles acquiring mass by locking into specific resonant modes within this field79. This frequency-centric view aligns with the Autaxys Generative Theory, which proposes reality as a computational, pattern-based emergence driven by the "Autaxic Trilemma" of Novelty, Efficiency, and Persistence on a Universal Relational Graph7.... RFC specifically aims to engineer a computational system that embodies principles like Efficiency (stable, optimal configurations) and Persistence (coherence and stability) in its physical manifestation of computational states10.... Based on this foundational reinterpretation, RFC's best-mode invention centers on a field-centric quantum computing paradigm, rather than a particle-centric one1.... Here are the key components and methods of the best-mode invention: 1. The Fundamental Unit: The "Harmonic Qubit" (h-qubit) • Definition: The h-qubit is the fundamental unit of information in RFC1.... Unlike traditional particle-based qubits, an h-qubit is defined as a discrete, stable, and coherent resonant frequency state (or a superposition of such states) within a wave-sustaining physical medium1.... • Field-Centric: The h-qubit is a property of the field itself, not a physical particle being manipulated within the field1.... Information can be encoded in properties of the wave, such as phase, amplitude, or polarization1819. 2. The Architecture: The "Resonant Quantum Processor" (RQP) The RQP is the physical device for RFC317. It comprises: • Wave-Sustaining Medium (WSM): This is the core physical substrate engineered to support multiple, stable, and addressable high-Q resonant modes1.... ◦ Bio-Inspired Design: A preferred embodiment uses a bio-inspired lattice structure designed to mimic the geometry of biological components known to exhibit quantum coherence, such as neuronal microtubules (e.g., cylindrical or helical)1.... This lattice can be fabricated from high-temperature superconducting (HTS) materials (e.g., YBCO) to minimize energy loss and support the Persistence principle2.... ◦ Dielectric Shielding Material: The lattice structure is substantially filled with or surrounded by a specialized dielectric material1.... This material is engineered for a high dielectric constant (e.g., >10) and an exceptionally low loss tangent at operating temperatures (e.g., millikelvin) to minimize energy dissipation and protect resonant states from environmental noise1.... Novel approaches include using specially formulated hydrogels or ordered liquids for stable cryogenic operation1.... This shielding dramatically reduces decoherence from environmental noise and thermal fluctuations, enabling operation at much higher temperatures (e.g., 10-30K, or potentially higher, reducing or obviating the need for millikelvin dilution refrigerators)1.... • Control System: This system applies precisely modulated electromagnetic or acoustic control fields to the medium1.... These fields directly interact with the resonant patterns, causing a deterministic and coherent evolution of the h-qubit states1.... This can be conceptualized as a "rheostat-like" continuous control over the probabilistic states1. • Readout System: This measures the final configuration of the h-qubit states to obtain the result of the computation24. Measurement involves performing a spectral analysis (e.g., Fourier transform) on the field in the cavity to identify resonant frequencies, phases, and amplitudes3. 3. The Method: The "Harmonic Gate" and Computational Process • Quantum Logic Gates: Logic gates (e.g., CNOT, Hadamard) are executed not by manipulating particles, but by applying precisely modulated control fields that directly interact with and deterministically evolve the coherent states of these resonant patterns1.... This is a field-field interaction1. The specific pulse sequences and methods for a universal set of quantum gates are a key area for patents28. • Controlled Decoherence as a Computational Resource: In a novel inversion of the traditional paradigm, decoherence is not treated as an error to be avoided but as a computational resource1.... By inducing controlled, non-Markovian decoherence through engineered noise channels (e.g., terahertz-frequency pulses, phononic lattices), the system can be steered toward a desired solution state, particularly for optimization problems1.... This transforms an initial coherent state into a new, desired coherent state30. Computation itself is the process of controlled coherence evolution1.... • Differentiation from Classical Communications: Your RFC method is fundamentally different from classical radio or cellular communications. While classical systems divide the spectrum into independent channels to prevent interference, RFC intentionally creates and controls coherent interference and interaction between its frequency states to perform quantum computation1632. This includes: ◦ Coherent Superposition: An h-qubit exists as a stable, coherent, mathematical combination of multiple basis frequencies, which classical radio cannot do32. ◦ Entanglement: RFC can create states where two h-qubits are linked, where the resonant state of one is conditional on another, a non-local connection with no classical analogue32. ◦ Quantum Interference: The final measurement leverages constructive and destructive interference of these coherent quantum wave states to produce results, unlike classical signal strength measurements32. 4. The "Compiler": From Algorithm to Waveform • Software System: A crucial component is a software system (compiler) that translates abstract quantum algorithms (e.g., expressed in Qiskit or Cirq) into precise sequences of time-dependent electromagnetic or acoustic waveforms to be injected into an RQP3.... This compiler optimizes the pulse sequence for coherent evolution and controlled decoherence1733. 5. Key Advantages & IP Focus The best-mode invention emphasizes several strategic advantages: • Reduced Cryogenic Requirements: Operation at higher temperatures (e.g., above 4 Kelvin) due to robust resonant field patterns and bio-inspired shielding1.... • Enhanced Coherence and Scalability: Intrinsic design to preserve coherence, with scaling achieved by defining more harmonic modes within the same medium rather than adding physical qubits1.... • Intrinsic Fault Tolerance: Information encoded in non-local, topologically protected interference patterns can be inherently resistant to local perturbations and errors124. • All-to-All Connectivity: In a resonant field, all harmonic modes can co-exist and potentially interact, overcoming "nearest-neighbor" limitations433. • Substrate-Neutrality and Temperature-Independence: The method is focused on the manipulation of field states rather than specific physical particles, making the underlying material less critical and potentially enabling operation across a wider range of conditions1.... • Redefining Logic Gates: The fundamental concept that a logic gate is executed by applying a deterministic control field to induce controlled evolution of coherent states of harmonic qubits is a master IP claim30.... To secure intellectual property, the best-mode invention focuses on patent claims that broadly describe the functional apparatus and specifically define the novel system and method16.... Specific "Best Mode" revised claims include: • Methods for encoding quantum information into stable resonant frequency states (h-qubits)36. • Quantum computational devices (RQPs) comprising a physical medium sustaining h-qubits and a control system for their manipulation36. • Methods for performing quantum logic gates by applying time-dependent control fields to induce controlled coherent interactions between h-qubit states36. • Methods for entangling h-qubits36. • RFC systems combining the RQP architecture with a compiler specifically designed for field-centric manipulation36. • Methods for performing quantum computation by encoding, manipulating, and measuring h-qubit coherent states36. Success in patenting RFC technology hinges on providing robust, detailed technical enablement disclosure in the patent application, sufficient for a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention37.... This includes detailed schematics, parameters, and potential experimental or simulation data demonstrating the creation, control, and measurement of the claimed h-qubits and their interactions within a defined system3739.