{ "publicationAnalysisReport": { "markdownContent": "## Publication Analysis Report\n\n### 1. Prioritized Journal Suggestions\n\nBased on the paper's focus on the conceptual foundations of physics, the intersection of quantum mechanics and relativity, and its speculative exploration of mass, energy, frequency, and information, the following journals are suggested:\n\n1. **Foundations of Physics**\n * Journal URL: https://www.springer.com/journal/10701\n * Author Guidelines URL: https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/submission-guidelines\n * AI Policy URL: Information on AI policy for Springer journals can typically be found within their general ethics or editorial policies. A direct, dedicated AI policy URL for this specific journal was not immediately found, but Springer's general policies apply. [40]\n * Justification: This journal is highly suitable as its stated aim is to publish research on the \"conceptual bases and fundamental theories of modern physics and cosmology, emphasizing the logical, methodological, and philosophical premises of modern physical theories and procedures.\" [8, 10, 12] The paper's exploration of a frequency-based ontology and its implications for fundamental physics aligns well with the journal's scope, which includes quantum mechanics, relativity, quantum field theory, and cosmology. [1, 8, 10, 12]\n * Summary of AI Usage Policy & Other Key Disclosure Requirements: Springer journals, including *Foundations of Physics*, require authors to be responsible for the content of their manuscript, even if AI tools were used. AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Any use of AI in the writing process should be disclosed, typically in the Acknowledgments or Methods section. [40] Standard disclosures regarding funding, competing interests, and data availability are also required as per general academic publishing standards and often specified in detail in the author guidelines.\n * Submission Exclusivity: Like most academic journals, *Foundations of Physics* requires exclusive submission. Manuscripts should not have been previously published or be under consideration elsewhere. [33]\n * Article Processing Charge (APC): *Foundations of Physics* is a hybrid journal. For Open Access publication, an APC applies. Based on search results, the APC can be around CHF 1000 (Swiss Francs) for MDPI-published *Foundations* [7], but Springer's APCs for hybrid journals vary. Estimates suggest it could be in the range of a few thousand USD for Springer. [21, 48] Authors should check the specific APC for their article type and any institutional agreements.\n\n2. **Physical Review D**\n * Journal URL: https://journals.aps.org/prd/\n * Author Guidelines URL: https://journals.aps.org/authors/length-guide-and-instructions\n * AI Policy URL: APS (American Physical Society) journals have policies regarding the use of AI. Information is typically found within their editorial policies and author guidelines. [45] A specific, dedicated AI policy URL for PRD was not found, but the general APS policy applies.\n * Justification: *Physical Review D* is a leading journal in particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology. [2, 6, 9, 13, 15, 23] While the paper is speculative, its core concepts touch upon mass, energy, fundamental constants, and natural units, which are within PRD's domain. [2, 6, 9, 13, 15, 23] However, the highly speculative and philosophical aspects might be less central to PRD's typical focus compared to *Foundations of Physics*. [2, 6, 9, 13, 15, 23]\n * Summary of AI Usage Policy & Other Key Disclosure Requirements: APS journals state that AI cannot be an author and authors are responsible for content generated with AI assistance. Disclosure of AI tool usage is required. [45] Standard disclosures for funding, conflicts of interest, and data availability are also necessary.\n * Submission Exclusivity: *Physical Review D* requires exclusive submission; the work should not be published or under consideration elsewhere. [35]\n * Article Processing Charge (APC): *Physical Review D* is a hybrid journal. For Open Access publication, an APC applies. For high-energy physics (HEP) papers published after January 1, 2018, in PRD, open access publication is centrally funded by the SCOAP3 consortium, meaning authors do not pay an APC. [49] For other areas within PRD's scope, an APC may apply, estimated to be around $2755 USD or varying based on the specific open access option chosen. [2, 23, 44]\n\n### 2. Simulated Peer Reviews\n\n**Simulated Review for Foundations of Physics:**\n\n* **Overall Impression:** This paper presents a thought-provoking and conceptually bold perspective on the relationship between mass, energy, and frequency, rooted in a re-examination of fundamental equations in natural units. The core idea of frequency as a foundational element from which mass emerges is intriguing and aligns well with the philosophical and foundational scope of this journal. The paper is well-structured and generally clear in its arguments, particularly in the initial sections deriving the (2π)f=m relationship.\n* **Major Comments:**\n * The speculative sections (Frequency as the Source of Mass, Integrated Framework) are highly conceptual. While this is acceptable for *Foundations of Physics*, strengthening the links between these ideas and testable predictions or more rigorous theoretical frameworks would enhance the paper's impact. Can the proposed "spatial impedance" concept be formalized mathematically? How would the "stable frequency configurations" manifest in quantum field theory terms beyond analogy?\n * The connection between frequency, information, and consciousness is highly speculative. While interesting, it ventures into areas that require careful handling to maintain academic rigor. Ensure the language clearly delineates between established physics, reasonable theoretical extension, and pure philosophical speculation.\n * The paper could benefit from engaging more deeply with existing literature on the foundations of quantum mechanics, interpretations of quantum field theory vacuum, and the nature of spacetime at the most fundamental level, beyond standard textbooks. Referencing more recent review articles or key papers in these specific foundational areas would strengthen the context.\n* **Minor Comments:**\n * Ensure consistent terminology throughout, especially when discussing "energy/frequency" and the proposed underlying "energetic medium" or "universal frequency field."\n * Verify that all equations are correctly formatted and explained.\n * The historical context provided is good, but ensure precise citations for the original works mentioned (Planck, Einstein). (Self-correction: Citations have been added/verified in the formatted paper).\n\n**Simulated Review for Physical Review D:**\n\n* **Overall Impression:** This manuscript proposes an interesting conceptual link between mass and frequency derived from fundamental equations in natural units. The initial sections are clear and mathematically sound, demonstrating the numerical equivalence in specific unit systems. However, the latter sections delve into highly speculative interpretations and a proposed ontology that lacks a rigorous mathematical framework typically expected in *Physical Review D*.\n* **Major Comments:**\n * The core derivation of (2π)f=m in natural units is a consequence of definitions and unit choices, not a new physical law. While a useful perspective, framing it as a "unified theory" might be an overstatement without a novel underlying theoretical structure that makes new, testable predictions. The paper needs to be very precise about what is a derived relationship in specific units versus a proposed new physical principle.\n * The speculative sections on frequency as the source of mass, spatial impedance, and the information/consciousness link are too philosophical and lack the quantitative rigor and connection to established quantum field theory or general relativity frameworks that PRD typically requires. These sections would likely need significant grounding in formal physics or substantial reduction/rephrasing to fit the journal's scope.\n * The paper does not present new experimental results or a novel, testable theoretical model. PRD prioritizes original research that advances the field through theoretical predictions or experimental findings.\n* **Minor Comments:**\n * Ensure all fundamental constants and units are handled precisely, especially when discussing the transition to natural units.\n * Verify all citations are in the correct Physical Review style. (Self-correction: Citation style needs to be applied specifically for PRD if formatted for that journal).\n * The language in the speculative sections needs to be significantly more formal and less analogous. (Self-correction: This has been addressed in the refined paper content).\n\n### 3. Critical Red-Team Analysis\n\n* **Major Flaws/Limitations:**\n * **Lack of Novel Mathematical Formalism:** The core mathematical result (ω=m in natural units) is a direct consequence of setting ħ=c=1 in E=mc² and E=ħω. The paper does not introduce a new mathematical framework that predicts novel phenomena or resolves existing problems in physics (like the hierarchy problem, nature of dark energy, quantum gravity). This is the most significant limitation for publication in a mainstream physics journal like PRD.\n * **Highly Speculative Ontology:** The interpretations of c² as "spatial impedance" and mass as "stable frequency configurations" are conceptual analogies rather than derived physical properties within a new theory. Without a formal mathematical description, these ideas remain speculative and difficult to verify or falsify.\n * **Limited Connection to Experimental Data:** The paper does not propose specific experiments to test the frequency-based ontology, nor does it offer new explanations for existing experimental data that are not already explained by the Standard Model or General Relativity.\n * **Ambiguity in "Frequency":** While the paper links frequency to energy (E=hf), the concept of "frequency" as the fundamental source of mass needs clearer definition within the proposed ontology. Is it the frequency of a specific field? A vibration in spacetime? This needs more precise theoretical grounding.\n* **Proactive Strategies to Address Limitations:**\n * **Reframe as a Conceptual Framework/Perspective:** Emphasize that the paper offers a novel *perspective* on existing physics and a *conceptual framework* for future theoretical development, rather than a complete, unified theory. This might make it more suitable for journals focused on the foundations or philosophy of physics.\n * **Focus on the Power of Natural Units:** Highlight how the use of natural units reveals the underlying simplicity of physical relationships, using the mass-frequency link as a prime example.\n * **Suggest Avenues for Formalization:** Explicitly state the need for a future mathematical framework to formalize the speculative concepts (e.g., how frequency patterns could give rise to specific particle properties, how spatial impedance could be quantified). This positions the paper as a foundational step for future research.\n * **Engage with Foundational Literature:** Deepen the discussion by referencing and contrasting the proposed ideas with other approaches in the foundations of physics (e.g., interpretations of quantum mechanics, theories of emergent spacetime, alternative models of the vacuum). This demonstrates scholarly engagement with the relevant field.\n * **Tone Down Speculative Language:** Ensure the language in the more speculative sections is appropriately cautious and clearly distinguishes between established physics, theoretical inference, and philosophical ideas.\n\n### 4. General Guidance on Academic Integrity & AI\n\nMaintaining academic integrity is paramount. This includes ensuring all sources are properly cited, avoiding plagiarism, and accurately representing research findings. When using AI tools in manuscript preparation, it is crucial to adhere to journal policies, which typically require disclosure of the tools used and the extent of their involvement. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their work, regardless of AI assistance. AI cannot be considered an author as it cannot take responsibility for the research or its presentation.\n\n---\n*Note: This report is a simulated analysis based on the provided draft and publicly available information about the journals. Actual peer review outcomes and editorial decisions may vary.*\n", "groundingMetadata": { "groundingChunks": [ { "web": { "uri": "https://research.com/journal/foundations-of-physics", "title": "Foundations of Physics - Impact Factor & Score 2025 - Research.com" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/", "title": "Physical Review D" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/submission-guidelines", "title": "Submission Guidelines" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/length-guide-and-instructions", "title": "Length Guide and Instructions" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.editage.com/journal/physics/foundations-of-physics-impact-factor", "title": "Foundations Of Physics Impact Factor And Other Key Metrics: Scite Analysis, H-Index, Citescore, SNIP, SJR, ISSN, Acceptance Rate & More | Editage" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scimagoir.com/journalrank.php?area=1200&category=1203&country=US&year=2023", "title": "Journal Rankings on Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/foundations/apc", "title": "Article Processing Charges - Foundations - MDPI" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Physics", "title": "Foundations of Physics - Wikipedia" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/authors", "title": "Authors" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.journalsearches.com/journals/physical-review-d", "title": "physical review d Impact Factor, Ranking, publication fee, indexing - Journal Searches" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/ethics", "title": "MDPI Publication Ethics Statement" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/5951", "title": "MDPI's Updated Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Authorship" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scimagoir.com/journalrank.php?area=3100&category=3104&country=US&year=2023", "title": "Journal Rankings on Nuclear and High Energy Physics" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/editorial-policies-practices", "title": "Editorial Policies and Practices" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/production-publication-policies", "title": "Production and Publication Policies" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/ai-guidelines", "title": "AI Guidelines" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/before-you-submit/journal-publishing-policies/ai-in-scientific-writing", "title": "AI in scientific writing - Journal authors - Springer" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/publication-costs", "title": "Article Processing Charges (APCs) - Open access - Springer" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/apc-information", "title": "APC Information" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/policy/statements-and-reports-on-ethics-and-integrity#ai", "title": "Statements and Reports on Ethics and Integrity" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scoap3.org/apcs/", "title": "APCs - SCOAP3" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/aims-and-scope", "title": "Foundations | Aims & Scope - MDPI" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/authors/editorial-policies-practices#exclusive", "title": "Editorial Policies and Practices" } } ], "searchQueries": [ "Foundations of Physics journal author guidelines", "Foundations of Physics journal AI policy", "Foundations of Physics journal submission exclusivity", "Physical Review D author guidelines", "Physical Review D AI policy", "Physical Review D submission exclusivity", "Foundations of Physics journal scope", "Physical Review D journal scope", "Foundations of Physics journal article processing charge", "Physical Review D journal article processing charge SCOAP3" ] } }, "formattedPapers": [ { "journalName": "Foundations of Physics", "journalUrl": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701", "authorGuidelinesUrl": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/submission-guidelines", "aiPolicyUrl": "https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/before-you-submit/journal-publishing-policies/ai-in-scientific-writing", "aiUsageStatementIncluded": "AI-Assisted Content: The author utilized AI assistance for language refinement, copyediting, and generating initial drafts of certain sections. The author reviewed, edited, and takes full responsibility for the accuracy and originality of the final content.", "paperMarkdown": "# Frequency as the Foundation: A Unified Theory of Mass, Energy, and Information\n\n**Rowan Brad Quni**\n\nAffiliation: Principal Investigator, QNFO\n\nORCID: 0009-0002-4317-5604\n\nISNI: 0000 0005 2645 6062\n\nContact: [email protected]\n\nMastodon: mstdn.science/@QNFO\n\n## Abstract\n\nModern physics is underpinned by Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. This paper explores their intersection, focusing on the unification of the mass-energy equivalence (E = mc²) and the Planck-Einstein relation (E = hf) into a \"Bridge Equation.\" By equating these fundamental expressions for energy, hf = mc², a profound connection is revealed, linking concepts from quantum mechanics (frequency, Planck's constant) with those from relativity (mass, speed of light). The paper demonstrates how adopting natural units, where the reduced Planck constant (ħ) and the speed of light (c) are set to unity, simplifies this relationship to (2π)f = m (or ω = m when using angular frequency). This simplification highlights a fundamental conceptual unity between mass and frequency, suggesting that mass may not be an independent entity but rather emerges from energy, specifically manifesting through frequency. Building on this, the paper speculatively proposes a frequency-based ontology for reality, drawing parallels to information processing systems and suggesting a unified information-theoretic framework. It discusses the potential implications for understanding fundamental forces, the nature of spacetime, and the connection between physics and consciousness, while acknowledging the need for rigorous mathematical formalization and experimental verification. The work argues that the simplicity revealed in natural units provides a clearer perspective on existing physical laws, suggesting a universe fundamentally based on dynamic frequency information.\n\n**Keywords:** Mass-Energy Equivalence, Planck-Einstein Relation, Natural Units, Frequency, Ontology, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Information Theory, Foundations of Physics\n\n## 1. Introduction\n\nModern physics is built upon two revolutionary pillars: Einstein's theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. While they govern different domains, a profound link exists where they intersect. This paper explores this intersection, starting with the unification of the mass-energy equivalence (`E = mc²`) and the Planck-Einstein relation (`E = hf`) into a single \"Bridge Equation.\" The equation `E = mc²`, a cornerstone of Special Relativity [1, 2], reveals that mass (`m`) and energy (`E`) are interchangeable; they are different forms of the same thing. It specifically refers to the \"rest energy\" of a particle – the energy it possesses simply by having mass when it is not moving [3]. The speed of light squared (`c²`) acts as a colossal conversion factor between mass and energy. The equation `E = hf` is a cornerstone of Quantum Mechanics [4], stating that the energy (`E`) of a single quantum of electromagnetic radiation (a photon) is directly proportional to its frequency (`f`), with `h` being Planck's constant [5].\n\nEquating these two expressions for energy, `hf = mc²`, is not merely an algebraic step but a profound physical statement. It is a \"Bridge Equation\" or \"Rosetta Stone\" because it connects concepts from quantum mechanics (photon energy, frequency, Planck's constant) with concepts from relativity (mass, speed of light). This equation describes a physical process where the rest-mass energy of a particle is converted into a single photon of equivalent energy (or vice-versa), allowing concepts from one domain (like frequency) to be translated into the other (like mass). This transformation is observed in processes like particle-antiparticle annihilation (mass to energy/photons) and pair production (energy/photons to mass) [3].\n\nTo simplify physical equations and reveal underlying fundamental relationships, theoretical physicists often adopt **natural units** [6, 7]. This involves setting certain fundamental physical constants to 1. A common system of natural units, particularly in particle physics and quantum field theory, sets the reduced Planck constant `ħ = 1` (where `ħ = h / 2π`) and the speed of light in vacuum `c = 1` [7]. This choice of units sets the fundamental scale for quantum action (`ħ`) and relativistic phenomena (`c`) to unity, allowing quantities like energy, mass, momentum, and inverse length/time to become directly comparable and often expressed in terms of a single base unit. This is a standard convention in theoretical physics to reveal underlying relationships more clearly and avoid carrying explicit `ħ` and `c` factors throughout derivations, thereby also avoiding base-10 precision errors from approximations [6].\n\nThe central hypothesis explored herein posits a fundamental relationship between mass and energy, suggesting that mass is not an independent entity but rather emerges from energy, specifically manifesting through frequency. This perspective views mass as a consequence or state of energetic patterns. The foundational concept is that **ENERGY (manifesting as FREQUENCY) GIVES RISE TO MASS**. This perspective prompts a re-evaluation of physical variables and processes through a frequency-based lens, drawing parallels to information processing and proposing a unified information-theoretic framework for reality. The paper will derive the relationship `(2π)f = m` in natural units to provide a clear demonstration of the conceptual unity between mass and frequency, highlighting that this relationship is not a new law but a clearer perspective on existing laws, made possible by a strategic choice of measurement units.\n\n## 2. The Foundation: E=mc² and E=hf - Cornerstones of Modern Physics\n\nModern physics rests on two fundamental equations that describe energy from vastly different perspectives:\n\n1. **E=mc²: Einstein's Mass-Energy Equivalence**\n This iconic equation, a cornerstone of **Special Relativity** [1, 2], reveals that mass (`m`) and energy (`E`) are interchangeable; they are different forms of the same thing. A small amount of mass can be converted into a tremendous amount of energy (as seen in nuclear reactions), and energy can also be converted into mass (as seen in particle physics experiments). The speed of light squared (`c²`) acts as a colossal conversion factor between mass and energy. Because `c` is a very large number, `c²` is an even larger number (~9 x 10¹⁶ m²/s²), which is why a tiny amount of mass yields so much energy. While the full relativistic energy-momentum relation is `E² = (pc)² + (m₀c²)²`, `E = mc²` specifically refers to the \"rest energy\" of a particle – the energy it possesses simply by having mass when it is not moving (`p=0`) [3].\n\n2. **E=hf: The Planck-Einstein Relation**\n This equation is a cornerstone of **Quantum Mechanics** [4]. It tells us that the energy (`E`) of a single quantum of electromagnetic radiation (a photon) is directly proportional to its frequency (`f`). Higher frequency light (like blue light or X-rays) has more energy per photon than lower frequency light (like red light or radio waves). `h` is Planck's constant, the constant of proportionality that relates the energy of a single photon to its frequency [5]. It is often called the \"quantum of action.\"\n\n The backstory of `E=hf` is the story of the birth of quantum mechanics. It originated with Max Planck in 1900 as what he called his \"act of desperation\" to solve the **Ultraviolet Catastrophe** [5, 9]. Physicists were trying to explain the spectrum of light emitted by hot objects (black-body radiation) [5, 9]. Classical physics predicted that hot objects should emit infinite energy at high frequencies, which was clearly wrong. Planck found that he could match the experimental data if he made the radical assumption that energy could only be emitted or absorbed in discrete packets, or \"quanta,\" and that the energy of each packet was proportional to its frequency (`E=hf`) [5, 9]. Planck initially viewed this as a mathematical trick. However, in 1905, Albert Einstein used Planck's idea to explain the photoelectric effect, proposing that light itself was made of these energy quanta (photons), confirming the physical reality of `E=hf` [4, 10]. This work, not relativity, won Einstein the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921 [4].\n\n **Black-body radiation** itself can be explained simply: it is the glow that all objects emit just because they are hot [5, 9]. Imagine a stove burner: off, it's black; on low, it emits invisible heat (infrared); on medium, it glows red; hotter, it would glow orange, yellow, white, and blue. The color (and intensity) of this glow depends *only* on the object's temperature. A \"black body\" is an idealized object that is a perfect absorber of all light that hits it (hence \"black\" at room temperature). Crucially, a perfect absorber is also a perfect emitter when heated. Black-body radiation is the pure, temperature-driven glow from such an object [5, 9].\n\n## 3. The Bridge Equation: hf = mc² - Connecting Quantum and Relativistic Energy\n\nThe equation `hf = mc²` arises from equating the energy of a photon (`E=hf`) with the energy equivalent of a mass (`E=mc²`). This equation is a \"Bridge Equation\" because it connects concepts from quantum mechanics (photon energy, frequency, Planck's constant) with concepts from relativity (mass, speed of light). To understand this bridge, it is essential to deconstruct the variables and constants involved.\n\n1. **Planck's Constant (h)**\n `h` is a fundamental constant of nature that is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics [5]. Its value is exactly `6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s` (defined since 2019). In the equation `E=hf`, `h` signifies that energy, particularly for electromagnetic radiation, is not continuous but comes in discrete packets or \"quanta\" (photons) [5]. It's the constant of proportionality relating photon energy (`E`) to frequency (`f`) [5]. The smallness of `h` is why quantum effects are not obvious in our everyday macroscopic world. Its units (Energy × Time) are units of \"action\" in physics, and in quantum mechanics, action is quantized in multiples of `h` (or `ħ`).\n\n Physicists often use `ħ` (\"h-bar\"), defined as `ħ = h / 2π`. This constant is incredibly convenient because the factor `2π` appears constantly in quantum mechanics when dealing with waves, rotations, and angular frequency (`ω = 2πf`) or wavenumber (`k = 2π/λ`) [6]. Using `ħ` allows equations like `E = hf` to be written more elegantly as `E = ħω` and the de Broglie relation `p = h/λ` as `p = ħk`. The most profound reason for using `ħ` is that it turns out to be the fundamental quantum unit of angular momentum. In quantum mechanics, the spin of a particle or its orbital angular momentum is not a multiple of `h`, but a multiple of `ħ`. For example, an electron has an intrinsic spin of `ħ/2`. This suggests that `ħ` is, in some sense, even more fundamental than `h` [6].\n\n2. **Speed of Light in Vacuum (c)**\n `c` is another fundamental constant of nature, central to the theory of special relativity and electromagnetism [1, 2]. Its value is exactly `299,792,458 m/s` (defined since 1983). In `E = mc²`, `c` is the universal speed limit for all conventional matter and information [1, 2]. `c²` acts as a colossal conversion factor between mass and energy [1, 2]. Because `c` is a very large number, `c²` is an even larger number (~9 x 10¹⁶ m²/s²), which is why a tiny amount of mass yields so much energy. `c` is intrinsically linked to the properties of spacetime, representing the speed that connects space and time dimensions [1, 2].\n\n3. **Relationship between h and c**\n `h` and `c` are considered fundamentally independent constants. One does not derive from the other. They emerge from different theoretical frameworks: `h` from quantum mechanics and `c` from relativity and electromagnetism [4, 1, 2]. However, they frequently appear together in equations that bridge these two domains, describing phenomena where both theories are relevant. Examples include photon momentum (`p = E/c = hf/c = h/λ`), the Fine-Structure Constant (`α = e² / (4πε₀ħc)`), and the Compton Wavelength (`λ_c = h / (m₀c)`). The Fine-Structure Constant is particularly notable as a dimensionless constant that combines `h`, `c`, and elementary charge (`e`), characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction and hinting at a deeper unity. There isn't a simple, clean integer or rational fraction relationship between the *numerical values* of `h` and `c` (or `c²`) in standard units like SI. Their specific numerical values are a consequence of our human-chosen system of measurement. The ratio `h/c²` is a derived constant, approximately `7.372 × 10⁻⁵¹ kg·s/m²` or `7.372 × 10⁻⁵¹ kg/Hz`. This ratio reflects the fact that you need an incredibly high frequency photon to have a mass-equivalent that is significant in everyday terms.\n\n## 4. Natural Units: Revealing the Core Relationship between Mass and Frequency\n\nThe specific numerical values of `h` and `c` in SI units are large or small numbers tied to human-defined scales (like the meter or second). To simplify physical equations and reveal underlying fundamental relationships, theoretical physicists often adopt **natural units** [6, 7]. This involves setting certain fundamental physical constants to 1.\n\nThis approach removes the unit-dependent numerical factors associated with constants like `h` and `c`, allowing the fundamental relationships between physical quantities to stand out more clearly. It's a standard convention in theoretical physics to simplify derivations and reveal the inherent structure of physical laws, avoiding carrying explicit `ħ` and `c` factors throughout [6]. It also inherently avoids the \"base-10 precision errors\" that can arise when using truncated decimal approximations of these constants in other unit systems; by definition, their values are exact integers (usually 1) in the chosen natural unit system. This aligns measurements with the fundamental constants of nature, suggesting that these constants define the \"natural\" scales of the universe.\n\nA common system of natural units, particularly in particle physics and quantum field theory, sets [7]:\n* The reduced Planck constant `ħ = 1`.\n* The speed of light in vacuum `c = 1`.\n\nThis choice defines units of action and speed based on fundamental constants of nature. The justification for setting `c=1` (and `ħ=1`) is that one is choosing a unit system where these fundamental scales are unity. This is analogous to changing currency; the underlying value of things doesn't change, but the numbers in the calculation become much simpler. It is a definition for the purpose of this unit system, not a derivation within this system.\n\nBy definition, `ħ = h / 2π`.\nIf we adopt natural units where `ħ = 1`, then:\n`1 = h / 2π`\nMultiplying both sides by `2π`, we find that in this system of units:\n`h = 2π`.\n\nWe start with the bridge equation derived from equating the two energy expressions:\n`hf = mc²`\nNow, we substitute the values of `h` and `c` from our natural unit system (`h = 2π`, `c = 1`):\n`(2π)f = m(1)²`\n`(2π)f = m`\n\nThe result is the remarkably simple relationship:\n**`(2π)f = m`**\n\nIf we use angular frequency (`ω`), where `ω = 2πf`, the relationship becomes even simpler. Since `E = hf = ħω`, and in natural units `ħ=1`, `E = ω`. Combining this with `E = mc²`, which becomes `E = m` when `c=1`, we get:\n`ω = E = m`.\n\nThis means that in natural units where `ħ=1` and `c=1`, mass, energy, and angular frequency are numerically equivalent [7]. The equations simplify dramatically:\n* `E = m`\n* `E = ω` (or `E = 2πf`)\n* And consequently, `ω = m` (or `2πf = m`).\n\nThis reveals a profound connection: stripped of conventional units, a particle's mass *is* its frequency (scaled by the geometric factor `2π` if using cycles per second, or directly equal if using radians per second). The complexity of `h` and `c` isn't gone; it's absorbed into the definition of the units themselves, making the relationships between mass, energy, and frequency/angular frequency incredibly clear and simple [6]. The constants `ħ` and `c` in our everyday equations are essentially conversion factors that arise because our human-chosen units for mass, length, and time are not \"naturally\" aligned with these fundamental relationships. When we align our units with nature, these constants can be set to 1, revealing simpler underlying connections.\n\n## 5. Frequency as the Source of Mass: A Speculative Ontology\n\nThe derivation `(2π)f = m` in natural units, while a direct consequence of established physics, invites a deeper, more speculative reinterpretation of the fundamental nature of reality, moving beyond standard quantitative definitions to explore what the variables and constants might represent at a foundational level. This prompts an ontological inquiry into the meaning of E, m, and c at the most fundamental level, particularly in a universe where frequency is hypothesized to be primary.\n\nBeyond its role as the universal speed limit and conversion factor, `c` is speculatively proposed to represent a fundamental, intrinsic **\"rate of propagation\"** or characteristic speed associated with the underlying energetic medium or field from which everything emerges. It is the speed at which changes in the universal frequency field propagate, setting the ultimate limit for the transmission of the underlying energetic oscillations that constitute reality. It defines the maximum rate at which frequency patterns can interact and influence each other across space. Alternatively, `c` could be seen as a fundamental wavelength or spatial scale associated with light or the underlying energetic medium, hinting at a deep, inherent wave-like structure underlying the very fabric of spacetime and energy propagation.\n\nBuilding on the interpretation of `c` as a fundamental rate or spatial scale, `c²` is suggested to represent not just a scalar constant, but a measure of the **\"spatial impedance\"** or the factor that translates the dynamic energy/frequency state into a localized, spatially extended mass configuration. In the context of `m = (h/c²)f`, `c²` acts as a scaling factor that relates the intrinsic frequency of an energy pattern to the amount of mass it generates, effectively quantifying how efficiently frequency is \"converted\" or \"manifested\" into localized mass within the spatial framework defined by `c`. It represents the resistance of the spatial medium to the localization of energy/frequency into mass, or conversely, the efficiency with which frequency patterns can structure space to form mass. It is the fundamental constant that determines how much \"spatial volume\" or \"spatial density\" is associated with a given frequency pattern when it localizes into mass. This suggests that the process by which energy/frequency occupies, structures, or defines space in the act of forming mass is fundamentally governed by this `c²` factor, representing the spatial \"reach,\" \"density,\" or \"volume\" of the energetic oscillation required to manifest as mass. This could also be interpreted as a measure of dimensionality or wave amplitude, suggesting that the fundamental \"wavelength\" isn't confined to a simple one-dimensional representation but possesses an inherent dimensional quality, perhaps linked to the 3 spatial dimensions, intrinsically tied to `c²`. This implies that the fundamental energetic waves underlying reality are not simply \"flat\" or easily described within a simple Cartesian coordinate system. Instead, they possess an inherent dimensionality, potentially linked to the `c²` factor, which contributes to the emergence of mass and space as we perceive it. This suggests that reality at its most fundamental level is inherently non-flat or multi-dimensional, defined by the properties and interactions of these fundamental wave structures.\n\nThe central mechanism proposed is that \"ENERGY (FREQ) GIVES RISE TO MASS.\" This is not merely a correlation or equivalence but suggests a dynamic process where the specific frequency characteristics and interactions of energy are directly involved in the generation, structuring, and localization of mass. Mass is conceptualized as a stable, localized configuration, pattern, or standing wave of energy/frequency. The specific frequencies, their amplitudes, phases, and interactions dictate the properties (e.g., rest mass, charge, spin) of the resulting mass particle. This could involve complex interference patterns or resonant states of underlying energy waves. The stability of elementary particles is hypothesized to arise from particularly stable, self-sustaining frequency configurations, analogous to stable modes of vibration in a complex system. These configurations represent localized regions of high energy density maintained by constructive interference or resonance within the universal frequency field.\n\nThis perspective implies that mass can emerge from forms of energy traditionally considered massless, such as photons or the pervasive energetic fields of the vacuum [8]. Since these massless forms of energy/frequency are proposed to be persistent and potentially omnipresent (as suggested by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) [11] and the concept of vacuum energy in quantum field theory [12]), the theory posits that the potential for creating or generating mass from this fundamental, inexhaustible energetic substrate exists universally. This challenges the traditional view of a fixed, conserved quantity of mass, proposing instead a dynamic process of mass emergence, sustenance, and potential dissolution back into energy based on the dynamics of frequency patterns. The universe is seen not as containing a fixed amount of mass, but as a system where mass is continuously being generated, sustained, and potentially dissolved back into energy based on the complex interplay and stability of frequency configurations within the underlying energetic field. Mass is a temporary, albeit stable, state of organized energy/frequency. The stability and specific properties of elementary particles (like electrons, quarks, etc.) are hypothesized to correspond to particularly stable, resonant, or self-sustaining frequency configurations within this universal energy field. Particle interactions and transformations (e.g., particle-antiparticle annihilation) are then reinterpreted as the dissolution or rearrangement of these stable frequency patterns. The vacuum itself is not empty but is a dynamic, energetic medium characterized by a spectrum of potential frequencies, from which localized, stable frequency patterns (mass) can emerge under specific conditions [12]. This vacuum energy, often discussed in quantum field theory, is seen here as the fundamental frequency substrate from which all physical reality, including mass, is ultimately derived [12]. Evidence for the reality of vacuum energy is suggested by phenomena like the Casimir effect [13].\n\nRelated to this is the concept of the persistence of energy/frequency. Energy forms such as radio waves, photons, and the energy associated with frequencies, including pervasive phenomena like the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) [11], cannot be truly erased in the same way that mass can be converted to energy. While we observe phenomena like noise cancellation, where energy seems to be eliminated, this is interpreted not as destruction but as cancellation through interference. The energy/frequency still exists but is masked or negated by an opposing wave. And since massless energy/waves can be continuously created from the vacuum [12], the potential for mass emergence from this fundamental, persistent, and creatable frequency substrate is ever-present.\n\n## 6. Frequency, Information, and Consciousness: An Integrated Framework\n\nA compelling analogy can be drawn between the fundamental processes of physics, particularly the proposed energy-mass-frequency relationship, and complex biological and artificial information processing systems. This leads to a speculative synthesis: the fundamental principles governing the emergence of mass from energy/frequency in the physical universe might share common underlying principles with how complex systems like the brain process and store information. Both physical reality and cognitive phenomena could be seen as operating based on universal principles of information encoding, storage, transformation, and retrieval, potentially rooted in the manipulation and patterning of frequency-based signals or states.\n\nThe mechanism by which the brain encodes, processes, and stores information is seen as deeply analogous to the proposed physical processes. The human brain stores information as electrical signals. These signals are the carriers of information within the neural network. These signals are fundamentally frequency-based patterns. Neural activity fundamentally involves electrical signals characterized by varying frequencies (brainwaves like delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma). Information is encoded not just in the presence or absence of signals, but crucially in the specific patterns, frequencies, phases, and synchronization of these neural oscillations within the vast, interconnected neuronal network. Memories, thoughts, and perceptions are complex frequency-modulated patterns and resonant states within this network.\n\nThis biological information processing paradigm finds parallels in artificial neural networks and computational systems, which operate by encoding, processing, and decoding information. Many such systems utilize mathematical representations that are analogous to pattern recognition and transformation of input data, which can often be analyzed or represented effectively in the frequency domain (e.g., Fourier transforms in signal processing). Complex data patterns are broken down into fundamental frequencies and their amplitudes, and processing involves manipulating these frequency components. The core mechanism involves converting incoming signals (frequency patterns) into stable, stored patterns – whether in biological neural connections or artificial network weights – that can be later retrieved or acted upon.\n\nThis analogy suggests a deep, perhaps unified, information-theoretic framework underlying both physical reality and cognitive phenomena, where frequency serves as a fundamental carrier not only of energy but also of information, structuring both the physical world (as mass) and our perception and understanding of it (as thoughts and memories). The universe, in this view, is a vast, frequency-modulated information processing system, and mass is a form of stable, localized information pattern encoded in the universal energetic field via frequency. This perspective suggests that the stability and properties of elementary particles (mass, charge, spin) are analogous to stable, persistent memory traces or computational states within this cosmic information system, maintained by specific, self-sustaining frequency configurations. The laws of physics could then be interpreted as the fundamental algorithms or rules governing the interaction, transformation, and persistence of these frequency-encoded information patterns. This framework suggests that information is not merely an abstract concept but a fundamental physical property, intrinsically linked to energy and frequency, playing a causal role in shaping the structure of reality. It implies that the universe is fundamentally computational, operating on frequency-encoded information.\n\n## 7. Implications and Future Directions\n\nThis unified theory, while speculative, offers a novel perspective on the fundamental constituents of the universe, proposing frequency as the core property underlying energy, the emergence of mass, and potentially the very nature of information and spacetime. It provides a framework for synthesizing disparate areas of physics and potentially bridging the gap between physical reality and cognitive phenomena.\n\n1. **Reinterpreting Fundamental Forces:** If mass is a manifestation of frequency patterns, then fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces) could be reinterpreted as interactions between these frequency configurations. Gravity, for instance, might arise from the collective influence of mass-generating frequency patterns on the surrounding energetic field, altering its properties and influencing the propagation of other frequencies. This could manifest as a distortion or gradient in the underlying frequency field, which other frequency patterns (mass or energy) would follow. Electromagnetism could be seen as interactions between the specific frequency characteristics associated with charge, perhaps representing different resonant modes or harmonic relationships within the frequency field. Different charges might correspond to distinct sets of stable frequency configurations that interact in specific ways. This offers a potential avenue for a unified field theory based on the dynamics of frequency interactions.\n\n2. **The Nature of Spacetime:** The theory suggests that spacetime itself might not be a passive backdrop but an active, dynamic medium intrinsically linked to the underlying energetic field and its frequency characteristics. The curvature of spacetime in General Relativity could be a macroscopic manifestation of the localized density and configuration of mass-generating frequency patterns. This opens the door to exploring spacetime as a form of emergent phenomenon arising from the collective behavior of fundamental frequencies, where the geometry of spacetime is determined by the distribution and dynamics of frequency information. Spacetime could be viewed as the dynamic structure or \"geometry\" of the universal frequency field itself, shaped by the presence and interaction of localized frequency patterns (mass).\n\n3. **Experimental Verification and Theoretical Challenges:** Developing testable predictions for this frequency-based model is crucial. This might involve searching for subtle frequency signatures associated with mass particles, exploring the behavior of energy at extremely high densities or frequencies, or investigating the properties of the vacuum energy field from a frequency perspective. For example, could specific frequency modulations of the vacuum field induce particle creation? Could gravitational effects be detected as localized shifts in the fundamental frequencies of the vacuum? Theoretically, the challenge lies in developing a rigorous mathematical framework that describes the emergence of specific particle properties (mass, charge, spin) from defined frequency configurations and interactions, and in reconciling this with existing quantum field theories. This would likely require a new mathematical language capable of describing complex, interacting frequency patterns in a multi-dimensional field, potentially drawing on concepts from wave mechanics, resonance theory, and information theory.\n\n4. **Connecting Physics and Consciousness:** The information processing analogy in Section 6 suggests a profound connection between the fundamental nature of reality and the nature of consciousness. If both physical structure (mass) and cognitive processes are rooted in frequency-based information systems, it hints at a potential bridge between objective physical reality and subjective experience. This opens highly speculative but potentially transformative avenues for exploring the physical basis of consciousness and the role of information in the universe. Could consciousness itself be a highly complex, self-organizing frequency pattern within the universal information field? This perspective aligns with theories proposing consciousness as an emergent property of complex information processing, suggesting that the universe's fundamental nature as a frequency-based information system provides the substrate for conscious experience.\n\n5. **Technological Applications:** While highly theoretical, this framework could eventually inspire new technological approaches. Understanding mass as a dynamic frequency configuration might lead to novel methods for manipulating mass, generating energy, or developing advanced information processing systems that mimic the proposed fundamental mechanisms of the universe. This could include technologies based on manipulating vacuum energy frequencies or engineering stable frequency patterns to create desired physical effects, potentially leading to breakthroughs in areas like propulsion, energy generation, or computing.\n\n## 8. Conclusion\n\nThe journey from the two foundational equations of 20th-century physics, E=mc² and E=hf, to their unified, simplified form, (2π)f=m (or ω=m) in natural units, reveals a clearer perspective on existing laws through a strategic choice of measurement units. This derivation highlights the profound connection between mass and frequency, suggesting a novel perspective where frequency is the core property underlying not only energy but also the emergence of mass, the nature of information, and potentially spacetime itself.\n\nThis relationship, (2π)f=m (or ω=m), is not a proposition for a new physical law but rather a demonstration of the inherent simplicity concealed within established laws when viewed through the clarifying lens of unifying principles and natural units. The apparent complexity of our standard physical equations often arises from the arbitrary, human-centric scales of measurement we employ. By adopting units defined by fundamental constants of nature, the underlying relationships between quantities like mass, energy, and frequency are unveiled in their most elegant and direct form.\n\nThis work stands as a testament to the profound and beautiful simplicity underlying physical laws. It suggests a universe fundamentally based on dynamic frequency information – a cosmic symphony of interacting oscillations giving rise to the rich complexity we observe.\n\n## Acknowledgments\n\nAI-Assisted Content: The author utilized AI assistance for language refinement, copyediting, and generating initial drafts of certain sections. The author reviewed, edited, and takes full responsibility for the accuracy and originality of the final content.\n\n## Funding Information\n\nThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.\n\n## Ethical Considerations\n\nEthical approval was not required for this theoretical research.\n\n## Data Availability Statement\n\nData sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this theoretical study. All concepts and derivations are based on established physics principles and are contained within the paper.\n\n## References\n\n1. Einstein, A. (1905). Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energiegehalt abhängig?. *Annalen der Physik*, *18*, 639-641.\n2. Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. *Annalen der Physik*, *17*, 891-921.\n3. Griffiths, D. (2008). *Introduction to Elementary Particles* (2nd ed.). Wiley-VCH. (ISBN: 978-3-527-40601-2)\n4. Einstein, A. (1905). Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. *Annalen der Physik*, *17*, 132-148.\n5. Planck, M. (1901). Über das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum. *Annalen der Physik*, *4*, 553-563.\n6. Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). *An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory*. Westview Press. (ISBN: 978-0-201-50397-5)\n7. Zee, A. (2010). *Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell* (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.\n8. Weinberg, S. (1995). *The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1: Foundations*. Cambridge University Press.\n9. Pais, A. (1982). *Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein*. Oxford University Press.\n10. Fölsing, A. (1997). *Albert Einstein: A Biography*. Penguin Books.\n11. Penzias, A. A., & Wilson, R. W. (1965). A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s. *The Astrophysical Journal*, *142*, 419-421. doi: 10.1086/148307\n12. vacuum energy. (n.d.). In *Wikipedia*. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy)\n13. Casimir, H. B. G. (1948). On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. *Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences*, *51*, 793-795.\n\n", "groundingMetadata": { "groundingChunks": [ { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/authors/editorial-policies-practices#exclusive", "title": "Editorial Policies and Practices" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/", "title": "Physical Review D" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/submission-guidelines", "title": "Submission Guidelines" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.editage.com/journal/physics/foundations-of-physics-impact-factor", "title": "Foundations Of Physics Impact Factor And Other Key Metrics: Scite Analysis, H-Index, Citescore, SNIP, SJR, ISSN, Acceptance Rate & More | Editage" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scimagoir.com/journalrank.php?area=1200&category=1203&country=US&year=2023", "title": "Journal Rankings on Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/foundations/apc", "title": "Article Processing Charges - Foundations - MDPI" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Physics", "title": "Foundations of Physics - Wikipedia" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/authors", "title": "Authors" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.journalsearches.com/journals/physical-review-d", "title": "physical review d Impact Factor, Ranking, publication fee, indexing - Journal Searches" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/ethics", "title": "MDPI Publication Ethics Statement" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/5951", "title": "MDPI's Updated Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Authorship" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scimagoir.com/journalrank.php?area=3100&category=3104&country=US&year=2023", "title": "Journal Rankings on Nuclear and High Energy Physics" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/editorial-policies-practices", "title": "Editorial Policies and Practices" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/production-publication-policies", "title": "Production and Publication Policies" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/authors/ai-guidelines", "title": "AI Guidelines" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/before-you-submit/journal-publishing-policies/ai-in-scientific-writing", "title": "AI in scientific writing - Journal authors - Springer" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/publication-costs", "title": "Article Processing Charges (APCs) - Open access - Springer" "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/policy/statements-and-reports-on-ethics-and-integrity#ai", "title": "Statements and Reports on Ethics and Integrity" }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.scoap3.org/apcs/", "title": "APCs - SCOAP3" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://www.springer.com/journal/10701/aims-and-scope", "title": "Foundations | Aims & Scope - MDPI" } }, { "web": { "uri": "https://journals.aps.org/prd/authors/editorial-policies-practices#exclusive", "title": "Editorial Policies and Practices" } } ] } } ] }