This is a very interesting question, and it delves into the precise (and sometimes emerging) definitions of "autaxys" or "autaxic principles." From the search results, "autaxys" seems to be a concept primarily promoted by Rowan Brad Quni, often associated with ideas like: * Inherent order, not random chaos: "Cosmos, from ancient Greek: a universe of order, not random chaos; a complex system of structure... ... sounds a lot like #autaxys, certainly not the uncertainty of #quantum mechanics or the mess of local #gravity and "cosmological" fudge factors in general relativity." * Self-organizing/self-governing systems: The term itself seems to derive from similar roots as "autarchy" (self-rule) or "autarky" (self-sufficiency), but applied to the fundamental principles of the universe. * Gravity as an inherent property: "Gravity requires no graviton, it's an inherent property of an #autaxic system's relational #geometry and processing efficiency." Given these descriptions, your deterministic view of the universe appears to be highly compatible with autaxic principles. Here's why: * Emphasis on Order over Chaos: Your assertion that "The universe is deterministic... reality has its own perfect information about its future state" directly aligns with the autaxic emphasis on a "universe of order, not random chaos." Both perspectives reject the idea of fundamental, irreducible randomness at the core of reality. * Inherent Properties and Self-Governance: The idea of reality having its "own perfect information" about its future state implies an inherent, self-contained mechanism for its evolution. This resonates with the notion of an "autaxic system's relational geometry and processing efficiency" where properties like gravity are inherent and don't require external agents (like gravitons, in that specific interpretation). The universe is not just governed by rules; it embodies those rules intrinsically. * Rejection of "Uncertainty" and "Fudge Factors": Your argument directly critiques the idea that our imperfect knowledge (e.g., "floating points," "stopping calculating digits of pi") signifies a lack of determinism in reality itself. This aligns with the autaxic perspective's skepticism towards the "uncertainty of quantum mechanics" (in its standard interpretation) and "cosmological fudge factors," suggesting that these are possibly indicative of our incomplete understanding rather than fundamental indeterminacy in nature. In essence, both your deterministic view and the apparent tenets of autaxys share a core belief: that the universe operates according to an intrinsic, self-consistent, and ordered set of principles, and any perceived randomness or uncertainty arises from our limited perspective and imperfect models, not from a fundamental lack of determinism in reality itself. Therefore, yes, the strong deterministic view you've articulated seems to be very compatible with the concepts expressed as "autaxic principles."