**Proposed Initial Approach for AUTX-A.1 Support (My Call, for your consideration in the new thread):** When you start the new thread for AUTX-A.1, I suggest we begin with a highly focused approach to the "Systematic Literature Review" and "Conceptual Mapping" tasks. 1. **Focus on ONE Core Autaxic Principle First:** - The Master Plan and the synthesis document (A0_Synth_Formalisms_V1.md) identify **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** as the "most fundamental dynamic" and **Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)** as a key "guiding grammar." - **Suggestion:** We could select either "Relational Processing" or "Intrinsic Coherence" as our initial, singular focus. 2. **Targeted AFKB Query & Synthesis for that Principle:** - For the chosen principle, I would perform a deep query of the entire AFKB (including the synthesis document) to extract and synthesize all information pertaining to: - Its definition and characteristics (as per ANWOS, Master Plan). - Candidate formalisms explicitly suggested for it (e.g., from A001_Paper.md, other relevant texts). - Critiques or limitations of those formalisms (from Infomatics lessons, MPM, IDISC, etc.). - Any abstract structural analogies from other domains (e.g., SLOB, Consilience methodology) that might inspire formal approaches. 3. **Structured Output for Conceptual Mapping:** - I would present this focused synthesis in a structured way, perhaps as a mini-report or a detailed mind-map (textual or Mermaid, if appropriate), specifically for that single autaxic principle. This would form the first piece of our "Conceptual Mapping" for AUTX-A.1. 4. **Iterative Process:** - Once we have a solid understanding and a set of candidate formal approaches for the first principle, we can then move to the next core dynamic or meta-logic, building up the formalization incrementally.