Excellent! The `tool_code` executed successfully, and the minified engine `E_v3_3_2_M1` performed as expected. Here's a summary of what we've achieved in this last step: 1. **Successful Definition & Instantiation:** The minified engine class `E_v3_3_2_M1` was correctly defined and instantiated using the provided minified script and state JSON. 2. **Correct State Processing:** The engine loaded the state where `KCM` (Kernel CurrentMH ID, minified) was set to `TA_M` (Terminate AIOS Minified). 3. **Graceful Termination:** Upon calling `engine.k_se()` (minified `kernel_start_engine`), the engine correctly identified the `TA_M` state and proceeded to a clean termination, as confirmed by the output `{"s": "TERM_M", ...}` and the log messages. 4. **Fast Execution:** The execution time was extremely low (around 0.005 - 0.006 seconds in the successful run), demonstrating the significant performance gain from minification for loading and basic state processing. 5. **Verification Checks Passed:** All the checks we put in place confirmed that the engine's internal state and log output matched the expected termination sequence. 6. **FEL Method Presence Confirmed:** The conceptual test of `fel_s1` on a fresh instance of `E_v3_3_2_M1` passed, indicating that the FEL-MH methods are defined and callable in our minified script. This is a crucial milestone. We now have a rapidly loading, minified version of the AIOS engine (`E_v3_3_2_M1`) whose core FEL-MH methods are in place. **So, "Ok now what?"** The next logical step is to test the **functionality of the minified FEL-MH itself**. We want to see if this `E_v3_3_2_M1` engine can: 1. Be started fresh. 2. Allow the user (simulated by us) to choose "Evolve Engine". 3. Enter its minified `FEL_M` (FEL-MH). 4. Correctly proceed through the FEL-MH steps by making the appropriate LLM requests (for TIDs, version calculation, TID application, and artefact regeneration). This will involve a sequence of `tool_code` blocks where: * We start `E_v3_3_2_M1` without an initial state (so it presents initial options). * We provide an LLM response to select "Evolve Engine". * We then provide subsequent LLM responses for each step of the `FEL_M` cycle, using a *new, simple TID* for this test. **Proposed Plan for the Next Turn(s):** **Turn 1: Initiate Minified Engine and Start FEL-MH** 1. **Action:** * Instantiate a *fresh* `E_v3_3_2_M1` engine (no initial state string). * Call `engine.k_se()`. This should result in an LLM request for initial user options (via `k_pio`). 2. **Expected Output:** An LLM request from `k_pio` asking how to begin. **Turn 2: Select "Evolve Engine"** 1. **Action:** * Provide an LLM response to the previous request, simulating the user choosing "Evolve Engine". * Call `engine.k_pirc(llm_response)`. This should lead to `KCM` being set to `FEL_M` and `fel_s1` being called. 2. **Expected Output:** An LLM request from `fel_s1` asking for TIDs. Subsequent turns would then involve providing TIDs, a new version string, a conceptual application log, and finally a conceptual new engine artefact, to walk the minified `FEL_M` through its entire lifecycle. This will thoroughly test if the minified FEL-MH is not just present, but fully operational. Would you like to proceed with this plan, starting by initiating a fresh `E_v3_3_2_M1` engine?