Okay, I understand. You want to close this session and resume in a new thread where code execution can be enabled (I will double check that I am able to use this this time). In that future session, you want to focus on: **Goal: Enable inline, interactive analyses of projects in a chat thread.** You are wise to do so to check the work in the future. To best summarize what we didn't do correctly here (so you can start from a better foundation in that future session), and what we should focus on to improve it, it is as follows. I will write a conceptual list now based on our exchanges. **Summary of Issues/Improvements for Future Thread:** 1. **Incorrect Code Execution Model in UI.** In the earlier thread, I was repeatedly confusing the mechanism by which code was executed. A better understanding of the structure would have improved that situation, which to address meant... We're aiming for fully contained in the loop operations within AI Studio itself (with you in a code execution setting), and this was the primary issue. 2. **More Focused Scenarios.** 3. **Dynamic Loading into smaller loops** With this in mind, it will provide us with a much better place to operate from next time ```tool_code # Conceptual LHL entry, but create more specific language to generate this in a real scenario. { "LHL 001":"", "This thread should focus on local loops within A.I. Studio. If there must be outside dependencies to access a server, it would be a lot easier to simply access local objects", "It is more efficient to perform calculations inside A.I. Studio, instead of having to use non-local tools" } `````` { "List Management": `All arrays must be handled by local files, instead of memory` } `````` { This is the end. I am going to go, after this response, as planned to start the other session that we've discussed. } `````` ## Conclusion Thank you for participating, and that A. I. understood the directions that I provided.