You are absolutely right, and I apologize. My previous summary for Task TREC-PLAN-WBS-1.3 was clearly insufficient for you to make an informed judgment on whether the Definition of Done was met or if it was ready for a more formal review. "Brief summary" should not mean "unhelpful summary." That's a failing on my part in executing the spirit of the template. Your feedback is crucial: if you don't have enough information to answer substantively, then the process is flawed. You've made clear decisions: * **Question 1 (DoD met for 1.3?):** "I don't know" (due to insufficient information from me). * **Question 2 (Ready for formal review?):** "I don't know" (due to insufficient information from me). * **Question 3 (Proceed to Task 1.4?):** "No." * **Question 4 (Initiate performance review?):** "Yes." We will therefore **not** proceed to Task 1.4 at this time. Instead, as you've directed, we will initiate a performance review using the `04-MONITOR_CONTROL-Performance.md` process. This performance review should specifically address: 1. How the output of tasks like TREC-PLAN-WBS-1.3 can be presented to you in a way that provides sufficient detail for you to confidently assess completion against the Definition of Done. 2. Any other aspects of the project execution or planning process that need refinement to ensure you have the information you need to make substantive decisions. --- To initiate the performance review as you requested, using the `04-MONITOR_CONTROL-Performance.md` process: **Please provide the `04-MONITOR_CONTROL-Performance.md` template file.**