DNS Personal Identifier Feasibility Universal Personal Identifiers and DNS: Enabling Choice Beyond Major Platforms I. Introduction: The Need for User-Centric Digital Identity and Service Integration The contemporary digital environment is largely shaped by dominant platforms that frequently act as intermediaries for a multitude of services. This centralization often leads to the fragmentation of user data across disparate silos, thereby limiting an individual's control over their digital identity and personal information. Users are commonly required to establish and maintain numerous accounts across various platforms, resulting in a fragmented digital presence and hindering the seamless movement of identity and data between services. Consequently, there is an increasing demand from individuals for user-centric solutions that grant them greater autonomy in managing their digital identities and the freedom to select their preferred service providers, independent of the major platform ecosystems. This report investigates the potential of a universal personal identifier, intrinsically linked to the Domain Name System (DNS), as a foundational technology capable of fostering enhanced user choice, control, and interoperability across a diverse range of digital services. The prevailing reliance on centralized platforms inherently constrains user autonomy and the ability to transfer their digital presence, underscoring the necessity for alternative, user-focused identity solutions. This trend is fueling significant interest in decentralized and federated approaches that aim to redistribute control and enhance user empowerment in the digital realm. II. DNS as a Foundation for Universal Personal Identifiers: Exploring the Capabilities of DNS TXT Records for Identity and Service Discovery The Domain Name System (DNS) stands as a globally distributed and hierarchical naming infrastructure that serves as the internet's fundamental directory. Its primary function involves translating human-readable domain names, such as websites, into machine-readable Internet Protocol (IP) addresses that computers utilize to communicate with one another.1 Beyond this core function of domain name resolution, the DNS protocol provides mechanisms for associating arbitrary textual data with domain names or other entities through the use of TXT records.2 These TXT records offer the capability to store small amounts of machine-readable information directly within the DNS infrastructure.2 Current practical applications of TXT records are diverse, including the verification of domain ownership, the implementation of the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) for email authentication, the establishment of Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) policies, and even facilitating zero-configuration networking through DNS-based service discovery.2 A single domain can have multiple TXT records associated with it, provided that the implementing DNS server supports this capability, and each of these records can, in turn, contain one or more character strings.2 While basic TXT records do not impose specific formatting requirements, they are not designed for storing substantial volumes of data; text values exceeding 255 characters must be segmented into multiple distinct parts.4 The structural specifications for TXT records are outlined in RFC 1035, which notes that the interpretation of the text string is context-dependent, with the data being treated as binary within the DNS protocol.2 Subsequent specifications, such as RFC 6763 which details DNS usage for service discovery, may impose specific encoding requirements for particular applications.2 Furthermore, structured formats for TXT records exist, such as the attribute-value pair format defined in RFC 1464.2 The existing infrastructure and worldwide reach of the DNS, coupled with the inherent flexibility of TXT records to accommodate various forms of data, establish it as a potentially effective platform for hosting a universal personal identifier along with associated information necessary for service discovery. The fact that the internet's core naming system can be leveraged for more than just resolving domain names to IP addresses opens up avenues for innovative applications in identity management and service integration. However, while TXT records offer considerable flexibility, their inherent size limitations, with a maximum of 255 characters per string, necessitate careful consideration in the design of the information to be stored. This constraint may require the adoption of standardized data formats to maximize the information density or the implementation of a system of pointers that direct to more comprehensive data sources hosted externally for more intricate configurations. III. Enhancing Communication Privacy and Portability A. DNS-Based Discovery of End-to-End Encrypted and Decentralized Messaging Beyond the conventional use of MX records for directing email, a universal personal identifier linked to DNS could significantly aid in the discovery of end-to-end encrypted or decentralized messaging protocols. By associating standardized information with the personal identifier through DNS TXT records, users could more easily find and connect with each other using secure communication methods. This standardized information could encompass various elements crucial for establishing secure communication, including users' public keys 4, specific protocol endpoints such as server addresses and port numbers, or even pointers to more extensive profile documents that contain this necessary information. For instance, a TXT record could be structured to include a field indicating a user's support for a particular decentralized messaging protocol, such as Matrix, XMPP with OMEMO, or Waku, alongside their corresponding public key for that protocol. The concept of DNS-based service discovery is already established and utilized for a range of purposes 1, and the underlying mechanisms could be adapted to facilitate the discovery of secure messaging capabilities. RFC 6763 provides a detailed specification on how DNS resource records can be named and structured to enable service discovery on a network.2 DNS, as a protocol, is inherently used in service discovery, allowing applications to locate and establish connections with various services within a network or across the internet.1 Furthermore, protocols like Oblivious DNS over HTTPS (ODoH) are being developed with the goal of enhancing the privacy of DNS operations, which could have implications for secure messaging discovery by obscuring the initial lookup requests.6 RFC 9462 defines a set of mechanisms for DNS clients to discover the encrypted DNS configuration of a resolver 8, illustrating the potential of leveraging DNS for setting up secure communication channels. Storing public keys directly within DNS TXT records, or providing clear pointers to their location, would enable a more direct and efficient key discovery process for encrypted messaging. This approach could potentially eliminate the reliance on centralized key servers, which can represent single points of failure or targets for compromise, thereby enhancing the overall security of encrypted communications. For such a system to function effectively and universally, however, it is crucial to establish standardized formats and encoding schemes for the protocol information stored within the DNS TXT records. This standardization would ensure interoperability between different messaging applications and protocols, allowing a wider range of secure communication tools to leverage the DNS-based discovery mechanism seamlessly. B. Addressing Challenges in Privacy-Focused Email Services Current privacy-focused email services and open-source email systems encounter a number of significant obstacles in their operation and adoption.9 One primary challenge is the persistent issue of spam management. Open-source email systems, in particular, may lack the sophisticated and constantly updated spam filtering capabilities that are often found in larger, more centralized commercial email services.11 Another hurdle is the efficient discovery of encryption keys, which is essential for secure email communication. Ensuring compatibility with the existing, vast legacy email infrastructure and its associated protocols also presents a considerable challenge for privacy-focused alternatives. Furthermore, closed-source privacy-focused email providers often face skepticism and trust deficits due to the lack of transparency in their backend operations, making it difficult for users to independently verify their privacy claims.9 Emails originating from self-hosted or less established open-source email systems may also experience deliverability problems, frequently being flagged as spam by major email providers.9 The ongoing maintenance, necessary updates, and the inherent difficulties in scaling open-source email systems to handle large user bases represent further limitations.9 Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted email server can also be expensive, both in terms of the initial investment and the continuous allocation of time and technical resources.9 Finally, some open-source email solutions might lack the polished and user-friendly interfaces that users have come to expect from commercial email applications.12 A standardized method for discovering user preferences or configurations through their DNS-based personal identifier could potentially help to mitigate some of these challenges. For example, users could specify their preferred email encryption protocols, such as PGP or S/MIME, their desired level of spam filtering, or even alternative contact methods directly within their DNS records. The discovery of preferred email servers or decentralized email addresses could also be facilitated through this mechanism. By allowing users to declare their security and privacy preferences in DNS, email systems could potentially adapt to these preferences automatically. This could lead to an improved user experience by streamlining the configuration of secure email and enhancing the overall security posture by making it easier for systems to adhere to user-defined preferences. However, while DNS offers a convenient place to store some preferences, the inherent limitations in data size might necessitate a more complex approach. In such a scenario, DNS could act as a pointer to a more detailed configuration profile hosted elsewhere, perhaps on a decentralized storage system, allowing for a greater degree of customization and flexibility without exceeding the constraints of DNS records. Table 1: Comparison of Closed-Source vs. Open-Source Privacy-Focused Email Services Feature/Aspect Closed-Source (e.g., Proton Mail, Tutanota) Open-Source (Self-Hosted) Verifiability of Privacy Claims Limited, backend proprietary High, code is publicly accessible Transparency of Backend Processing Low, proprietary systems High, users can inspect server configurations and logs Security Vulnerability Scrutiny Limited to internal audits Extensive, community review and contributions Vendor Lock-in High, often no self-hosting option Low, users have full control over their server and data Self-Hosting Option Generally not available Typically available Cost (Initial & Ongoing) Subscription fees may apply Server costs, domain registration, maintenance time Technical Expertise Required Low, user-friendly interfaces High, server setup, configuration, and maintenance skills Scalability Provider managed User managed, can be challenging to scale Deliverability Challenges Generally good, but backend opaque Can be significant, requires careful reputation management IV. Enabling User-Controlled Storage for Applications A. Technical Hurdles in Decentralized Data Storage for Applications For online applications such as photo sharing platforms or collaborative document editing tools, the design paradigm of storing user data on storage systems chosen by the user, whether it be a personal server or a decentralized storage solution like the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), introduces a range of significant technical difficulties.13 One of the primary challenges lies in effectively managing permissions. Controlling who can access, modify, or share data that is distributed across various user-controlled storage systems presents a complex problem. Different storage solutions often employ their own unique permission models, and the development of a universal system that can seamlessly bridge these differences is a substantial undertaking. Efficiently generating previews of various file types, including images and documents, stored on decentralized storage can also be challenging. This is particularly true if the data is fragmented across multiple nodes within the decentralized network or if specific software is required for rendering these previews, which might not be universally available. Enabling real-time collaboration on data that is not held centrally introduces further complexities. Facilitating simultaneous editing and ensuring data consistency across multiple users who might be accessing data from different storage locations requires sophisticated synchronization mechanisms and robust conflict resolution strategies. The speed at which data can be retrieved from decentralized storage systems can also be a limiting factor, often resulting in slower performance compared to centralized systems, especially for data that is accessed frequently. Maintaining data consistency across all the participating nodes in a decentralized storage network can also be a non-trivial task. Furthermore, scaling applications that rely on decentralized storage might necessitate intricate planning and coordination across a potentially large number of independent nodes. Ensuring the long-term durability and availability of data stored on user-controlled systems is another critical concern. This often relies on the individual users who operate these systems to maintain their storage infrastructure, which may not always be consistently reliable. While some decentralized storage platforms, like Filecoin, implement incentive mechanisms to encourage data persistence and availability, this remains a key consideration. Finally, efficiently indexing and enabling effective search functionalities across data that is distributed over numerous decentralized storage systems can pose significant technical challenges. Table 2: Technical Challenges of Decentralized Data Storage for Applications Challenge Description Potential Solutions (including how DNS-based identifier might help) Managing Permissions Controlling access, modification, and sharing across diverse storage systems. Standardized permission models, cryptographic access control, potentially linked to Decentralized Identity (DID). DNS could point to permission manifests. Generating Previews Efficiently Creating thumbnails and previews of various file types from distributed data. Edge computing for local processing, standardized preview formats, applications fetching and rendering locally. Enabling Real-Time Collaboration Synchronizing changes and resolving conflicts on distributed data. Conflict-aware data structures, distributed consensus mechanisms, peer-to-peer synchronization protocols. Data Retrieval Speed Potential for slower access times compared to centralized systems. Caching mechanisms, optimized routing within decentralized networks, potentially selecting storage based on geographic proximity (discoverable via DNS). Data Consistency Ensuring data integrity and coherence across all storage nodes. Consensus protocols (e.g., in blockchain-based systems), data verification mechanisms. Scalability Handling increasing data volumes and user loads in a distributed manner. Horizontal scaling across more nodes, efficient data sharding and distribution strategies. Data Durability and Availability Ensuring long-term data preservation despite node failures. Redundancy through replication, erasure coding, incentive mechanisms for storage providers. Indexing and Search Efficiently locating specific data across a distributed network. Distributed indexing techniques, content-addressing (like in IPFS), metadata discoverable via DNS. B. Leveraging DNS for Storage Discovery and Permission Management A user's DNS-based personal identifier could serve as a central point for discovering the location of their chosen storage for different types of applications. For instance, a TXT record associated with the identifier could specify an IPFS Content Identifier (CID) for storing photo collections and a URL pointing to a personal Nextcloud instance for managing and editing documents. Regarding the crucial aspect of access permissions for data stored on decentralized systems like IPFS, there are existing concepts and a growing number of emerging standards being developed.14 Blockchain technology, for example, can be utilized to manage user identities and the corresponding permissions required to access files stored on IPFS.16 Many decentralized file storage systems are designed to provide users with direct control over the access permissions for their data.17 Innovative concepts like Decentralized Consent Orchestration (DCO) and blockchain-based consent management are also emerging as potential frameworks for managing data access in decentralized environments.27 Projects such as Block's Decentralized Web Nodes (DWNs) are specifically aimed at establishing open standards for decentralized data storage, with a strong emphasis on user control over their information.32 While IPFS itself does not have built-in access control mechanisms, various solutions have been proposed that leverage technologies like Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) or encryption combined with secure key sharing facilitated through Ethereum smart contracts.28 Furthermore, the development of Decentralized Identity (DID) standards is progressing, with the goal of creating portable and user-controlled digital identities that could be seamlessly integrated with access control systems for decentralized storage solutions.29 DNS could effectively function as a central discovery mechanism for a user's distributed data footprint across the internet. This would allow applications, upon encountering a user's personal identifier, to query the DNS and locate the appropriate storage backend for the specific type of data they need to access. While robust and standardized open standards for implementing fine-grained access control within decentralized storage systems are still in the process of maturing, the combination of DID, verifiable credentials, and potentially blockchain-based permission management systems presents a promising pathway towards enabling secure and user-controlled data sharing in a decentralized digital landscape. V. Integrating with Federated & Decentralized Social Media A. DNS-Based Identity Management and Profile Migration A DNS-based personal identifier could provide a stable and user-centric approach to managing identity within federated social networks like Mastodon.37 DNS records associated with the personal identifier could be configured to reliably point to a user's current profile address on a specific Mastodon instance, for example, in the format @[email protected]. This could be achieved through the definition of a standardized TXT record format that stores the user's Mastodon handle and potentially the URL of their current instance. Such a mechanism would significantly simplify the process of migrating between different Mastodon instances without compromising the user's core discoverability within the network. If a user decides to move their account to a new instance, they would simply need to update the DNS record associated with their personal identifier to reflect the new profile address. Other users and applications could then continue to find them using the same consistent personal identifier, regardless of the specific instance they are currently using. Mastodon itself handles user identity through the LOCAL_DOMAIN setting configured for each individual server within the federated network.37 Usernames on the platform inherently include the server name, similar to email addresses, in the format @[email protected] Mastodon also provides built-in functionalities to facilitate account migration, including the ability for users to export and import various data such as followed accounts and blocked users, as well as the option to transfer their followers to a new account.37 A DNS-based identifier could therefore act as a valuable abstraction layer that sits above the instance-specific nature of identities within federated social media platforms. This would offer users a more persistent and portable digital identity for their social media presence, one that is not inherently tied to the lifespan or policies of any single server. While DNS can greatly facilitate the discovery of a user's current profile location, the actual process of migrating the profile data itself within federated networks like Mastodon would still rely on the platform's existing features for data export and import, as well as the follower transfer mechanisms. The primary advantage of the DNS-based identifier in this context would be to significantly streamline the discoverability aspect after a user has migrated their account to a new instance, ensuring that their network can still find them easily. B. Decentralized Social Graph Data It is technically feasible for users to store their social graph data, which includes information such as contact lists and follower/following relationships, on personally controlled storage systems like IPFS or personal data pods, and to make the location of this data discoverable through their DNS-based personal identifier.44 This could be achieved by configuring a TXT record associated with the user's identifier to point to the Content Identifier (CID) of an IPFS object or the URL of a data pod where the social graph data is stored. However, enabling applications to effectively utilize this distributed social graph data presents several main challenges.36 One of the most critical challenges is ensuring privacy. Users need robust mechanisms to control who can access and view their social graph data when it is stored on personal storage. This necessitates the development and implementation of fine-grained permission management systems. Keeping the social graph data synchronized across different devices and applications that might be accessing the decentralized storage also presents a significant technical hurdle. Existing social media applications would need to be fundamentally adapted to understand and effectively utilize this new model of distributed social graph data. This would likely require the development and adoption of standardized data formats and application programming interfaces (APIs) to facilitate interoperability. While decentralized storage inherently offers users greater ownership of their data, ensuring seamless portability of this data between different applications and platforms depends heavily on the adoption of these interoperable data formats.29 Finally, while decentralized systems often provide enhanced censorship resistance, this can also pose challenges for content moderation and the prevention of harmful or inappropriate content within social networks.36 Empowering users to maintain control over their social graph data offers substantial advantages in terms of both privacy and portability. However, realizing this vision requires a fundamental shift in how social networking applications are designed and how they interact with user data. The success of a distributed social graph model is contingent upon the development of open and widely adopted standards for data formats and communication protocols. These standards would be essential to enable seamless interoperability across various decentralized storage solutions and a diverse range of social media applications, ultimately unlocking the full potential of user-controlled social graph data. VI. User Choice for AI Services A. Signaling AI Service Preferences via DNS If individuals have preferences for using specific open-source AI models or particular third-party AI services, rather than relying on the default AI integrated into major platforms, their DNS-based personal identifier could potentially serve as a mechanism to signal these preferences.59 DNS TXT records associated with the user's personal identifier could be configured to store information that applications could discover and subsequently utilize to employ these alternative AI services on the user's behalf. This information might include the API endpoints for accessing the desired AI services, the specific names of the preferred AI models, any relevant configuration settings, or even pointers to more detailed configuration files hosted elsewhere. For example, a user could specify a preference for a particular open-source language model for text generation tasks or a specific third-party image recognition service for image analysis. This capability would allow users to extend beyond the default AI offerings of major platforms and exercise greater choice in the AI tools they utilize across various applications. DNS could provide a valuable mechanism for users to express their preferences for AI services at a system-wide level. This would enable various applications to respect these choices without requiring individual configuration within each application. For instance, if a user consistently prefers open-source AI models, this preference could be declared in their DNS record, and applications could be designed to automatically discover and utilize these models when performing relevant tasks, leading to a more unified and user-centric experience. However, the level of detail and complexity of AI service preferences that can be practically stored within DNS TXT records will likely be limited due to the size constraints of these records. This limitation might necessitate the adoption of a system of standardized keywords or the use of DNS records to point to more comprehensive configuration files stored in an external location. B. Standardization and Practical Considerations Creating a standardized way to declare "AI service preferences" via DNS records that diverse applications could reliably understand and act upon presents several practical difficulties.59 One significant challenge is the sheer diversity of AI service types currently available and the rapid pace at which AI technology is evolving. Standardizing preferences across areas like language models, image recognition, translation services, and many others would require a comprehensive and adaptable framework. Furthermore, ensuring that a wide range of diverse applications adopt and correctly interpret these DNS-based preference signals would necessitate broad agreement across the technology industry and potentially the development of supporting software libraries or frameworks to facilitate this integration. The inherent size limitations of DNS TXT records might also restrict the level of complexity and granularity of preferences that users can express through this mechanism. DNS records are subject to caching by DNS resolvers, and changes to these records might take some time to propagate across the internet. This could introduce delays in the responsiveness of preference updates, potentially affecting the user experience. Finally, careful consideration would need to be given to the security and privacy implications of storing and exposing user preferences for AI services within DNS records, ensuring that this information is not misused or accessed by unauthorized parties. Achieving widespread adoption of DNS-based AI preference signaling would likely require a collaborative effort involving various stakeholders in the AI industry to define standardized vocabularies and data formats for expressing these preferences within DNS records. A pragmatic approach to implementation might involve starting with basic, high-level preference categories and gradually introducing more detailed and nuanced options as the ecosystem matures and the relevant standards evolve through practical experience and broad consensus. VII. Grounding in Existing Open Source & Federated Solutions A. Leveraging the Current Open Ecosystem A number of mature and widely used open-source or federated alternatives are currently available for core digital services.86 In the realm of email systems, robust open-source mail server software like Postfix, Exim, and Dovecot are widely deployed, alongside privacy-focused open-source email clients such as Thunderbird. For file synchronization and sharing, popular open-source options include Nextcloud, ownCloud, Syncthing, and FreeFileSync.86 The landscape of social networking also features prominent federated and open-source platforms like Mastodon, which utilizes the ActivityPub protocol, as well as Diaspora and Friendica.36 In the domain of collaborative software suites, users can choose from solutions like Nextcloud, which includes an integrated office suite, LibreOffice, Etherpad for real-time collaborative editing, and the privacy-focused CryptPad.87 The existence of this vibrant and well-established open-source and federated ecosystem provides a strong and promising foundation upon which a DNS-based personal identifier system can be effectively built. This ecosystem offers a diverse range of digital services that users can readily choose from and seamlessly integrate with their universal identifier, making the concept immediately practical and valuable. Table 3: Mature Open-Source and Federated Alternatives for Core Digital Services Service Category Example Alternatives Key Features Federation Support (Yes/No) Email Systems Postfix, Dovecot, Thunderbird Robust server and client functionality, extensibility, privacy-focused options No (servers), Yes (clients) File Synchronization Nextcloud, Syncthing, FreeFileSync Cross-platform syncing, sharing, collaboration features Yes (Nextcloud, ownCloud), Yes (Syncthing), No (FreeFileSync) Social Networking Mastodon, Diaspora, Friendica Decentralized social networking, user control, chronological feeds Yes Collaborative Software Suites Nextcloud, LibreOffice, Etherpad, CryptPad Document editing, real-time collaboration, various productivity tools Yes (Nextcloud, Etherpad, CryptPad), No (LibreOffice) B. Complementary Role of DNS-Based Identifiers A DNS-based personal identifier system is primarily intended to function as a complementary technology to these existing open-source and federated solutions.6 Its main value proposition would likely lie in several key areas. Firstly, it could facilitate easier portability of identity between these diverse systems. While some platforms already offer their own migration tools, a DNS-based identifier could significantly streamline this process by providing a consistent and user-controlled point of reference. Secondly, it could enable better discovery of users across different instances or servers within federated systems. For example, in a federated social network, a DNS identifier could help users find each other more reliably, regardless of the specific server they happen to be using. Thirdly, by providing a standardized way to discover user preferences and service endpoints, a DNS identifier could unlock new kinds of interoperability between different open and federated services that do not currently exist. For instance, a collaborative document editing application could automatically discover a user's preferred secure storage provider based on the information associated with their DNS identifier. The concept of DNS Discovery is already being actively explored in projects like js-waku for decentralized messaging.91 Furthermore, initiatives such as Discovery of Designated Resolvers (DDR) are aimed at enhancing DNS-based discovery specifically for encrypted DNS resolvers, showcasing the potential of this approach for secure communication setup.8 The DNS-based identifier is not envisioned as a replacement for the existing robust open-source and federated solutions, but rather as a unifying layer that enhances their overall usability, promotes greater interoperability between them, and improves the portability of user identities across the digital landscape. The ultimate success of this complementary approach will depend on the willingness of the developers and communities behind these existing open and federated projects to embrace and integrate with the DNS-based identifier system. This might require collaborative efforts to develop supporting standards and communication protocols that enable seamless interaction. VIII. Avoiding Unrealistic Claims & Ensuring Added Value A. Unique Value Proposition of DNS-Based Personal Identifiers Examining the current landscape of digital identity technologies, including established federated login systems like OpenID Connect, enterprise solutions such as SAML, emerging Decentralized Identifier (DID) methods, and traditional platform-specific accounts, a universal, user-controlled identifier system that leverages the standard Domain Name System (DNS) for discovery addresses certain fundamental challenges uniquely well or with greater effectiveness. The global scale of the DNS infrastructure, its widespread adoption, and its inherent scalability provide a foundational reach that few other systems can match.1 Moreover, the DNS allows for a significant degree of user control over the discovery records associated with their domain, granting a level of autonomy in managing their digital presence. Its ability to point to diverse network types, including IP addresses, URLs, and content identifiers like IPFS CIDs, offers remarkable flexibility in connecting to a wide array of services. Furthermore, the well-defined and extensible nature of DNS record types and formats creates a solid basis for establishing new standards specifically tailored for identity and service discovery.2 Compared to federated login systems like OpenID Connect or enterprise-focused solutions like SAML, a DNS-based identifier offers a more inherently decentralized and user-centric approach, reducing reliance on specific, potentially centralized identity providers. While newer approaches like certain DID methods also prioritize user control over identity, leveraging the existing and ubiquitous DNS infrastructure can potentially offer a lower barrier to entry and broader initial compatibility across the internet. In contrast, traditional platform-specific accounts inherently lack portability and user control beyond the confines of that particular platform's ecosystem. The unique combination of the DNS's global infrastructure, the direct control users have over their records, and the system's inherent flexibility in pointing to a diverse range of services positions it as a powerful foundation for a universal personal identifier. This approach has the potential to effectively bridge the gap between the more centralized models of the current digital landscape and the emerging possibilities of decentralized digital services, offering a compelling balance of scale, control, and flexibility. The core advantage of this system lies in the user's ability to manage their digital identity and service preferences within their own domain, providing a level of control and portability that is often absent in other identity management systems. B. Tangible Benefits for Existing Open/Federated Service Users For an individual who is already actively using open-source and federated services, such as Mastodon for social networking and Nextcloud for file storage and collaboration, the clearest and most tangible benefit derived from also having and utilizing a DNS-based personal identifier would be significantly enhanced portability and discoverability across their digital interactions. Regarding their existing setup, a DNS identifier could facilitate easier and more seamless migration between different Mastodon instances without the risk of losing their established discoverability within the network. It could also simplify the process of sharing their Nextcloud instance or specific files and folders stored within it by providing a stable and personally controlled identifier that others can use to find them. Furthermore, it could potentially enable other users to more easily discover their preferred methods for encrypted communication, such as specific messaging protocols or secure email addresses, based on the information associated with their DNS identifier. Beyond improving their current experience with open and federated services, a DNS-based identifier could also enable fundamentally new capabilities. For instance, it could provide a mechanism for users to signal their preferences for specific AI services, and these preferences could then be respected by various applications they use across different platforms. More broadly, it could lay the foundation for building a more user-centric and inherently interoperable digital ecosystem. In such an ecosystem, various services, both within and potentially beyond the open and federated world, could discover and interact with each other in a more seamless and privacy-preserving manner, all based on user-controlled identifiers and preferences managed within the DNS. For users already invested in the principles and practices of the open and federated ecosystem, a DNS-based identifier could represent a crucial missing piece: a universal digital identity that is under their direct control and effectively ties together their various online presences and preferences, thereby making the entire ecosystem more cohesive, user-friendly, and empowering. The true potential and value of the DNS-based identifier, however, will be increasingly realized as more applications and services, both within and outside the existing open and federated ecosystem, actively adopt and integrate with it. This growing adoption will create a powerful network effect, ultimately benefiting all users by offering a wider range of choices and a greater degree of control over their digital lives and the services they utilize. IX. Conclusion: Realizing a User-Centric Digital Future with DNS-Based Identifiers The analysis presented in this report underscores the significant potential of universal personal identifiers linked to the Domain Name System (DNS) to empower individuals in the digital realm. By providing a user-controlled and globally accessible foundation for identity and service discovery, this approach can address many of the limitations inherent in the current landscape dominated by major platforms. The key benefits identified include enhanced portability of identity across diverse services, improved discoverability of users and their preferences, and the potential for enabling new forms of interoperability that prioritize user choice and control. However, the realization of this vision also entails navigating a set of challenges. These include the need for standardization in how identity and service information are represented within DNS records, addressing the technical complexities of decentralized data storage and social networking, and ensuring the widespread adoption of these new mechanisms by existing and future applications. Overcoming these hurdles will require collaborative efforts across various stakeholders, including technology developers, standards organizations, and the user community. Looking ahead, universal personal identifiers anchored to the DNS hold the promise of shaping a more open, user-controlled, and interoperable digital future. By placing individuals at the center of their digital lives, these identifiers can foster a more diverse and competitive ecosystem of services, ultimately leading to greater innovation and user satisfaction. As the demand for user autonomy and data sovereignty continues to grow, the development and adoption of such foundational technologies will likely play an increasingly important role in the evolution of the internet. Works cited What is the Domain Name System (DNS) Protocol? - Technology Gee, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.technologygee.com/what-is-the-domain-name-system-dns-protocol/ TXT record - Wikipedia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TXT_record DNS Lookup Text Record - MxToolbox, accessed April 29, 2025, https://mxtoolbox.com/txtlookup.aspx What is a TXT Record? - DNS Made Easy Blog, accessed April 29, 2025, https://dnsmadeeasy.com/post/what-is-a-txt-record What is a TXT record? | DigiCert FAQ, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.digicert.com/faq/dns/what-is-a-txt-record Configuring Oblivious DNS Over HTTP (ODoH) protocol - MyF5, accessed April 29, 2025, https://techdocs.f5.com/en-us/bigip-17-5-0/big-ip-dns-implementations/using-oblivious-dns-over-odoh-protocol.html DNS over HTTPS - Wikipedia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_over_HTTPS RFC 9462: Discovery of Designated Resolvers, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9462.html Why Open-Source Email is the Future: Security, Privacy, and ..., accessed April 29, 2025, https://forwardemail.net/en/blog/docs/why-open-source-email-security-privacy Comparing Email Providers: Privacy, Security, and User Experience, accessed April 29, 2025, https://examples.tely.ai/comparing-email-providers-privacy-security-and-user-experience/ Email Server Explained [2025] - Mailtrap, accessed April 29, 2025, https://mailtrap.io/blog/email-server/ Open Source Utilization in Email Security Demystified. - Guardian Digital, accessed April 29, 2025, https://guardiandigital.com/resources/blog/open-source-utilization-in-email-security-demystified Decentralised Data in Data Centres | Digital Realty, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.digitalrealty.ie/resources/articles/decentralised-data-in-data-centres Decentralized Data Storage: Security, Privacy, and Ownership - Acceldata, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.acceldata.io/blog/decentralized-data-storage-future-of-secure-cloud-solutions Decentralized Cloud Computing: Revolutionizing Data Ownership, Privacy, and Future Implications | E-SPIN Group, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.e-spincorp.com/decentralized-cloud-computing-data-ownership-privacy-future/ Blockchain IPFS: Ultimate Guide to Decentralized Storage |2024 - Rapid Innovation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.rapidinnovation.io/post/blockchain-ipfs-comprehensive-guide-to-decentralized-storage-solutions Beyond the Cloud: Navigating the Era of Decentralized File Storage - BitDegree, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.bitdegree.org/crypto/tutorials/decentralized-file-storage Understanding Decentralized Data Storage: A Comprehensive Guide - CelerData, accessed April 29, 2025, https://celerdata.com/glossary/decentralized-data-storage-comprehensive-guide Building Secure and Scalable dApps: Challenges and Best Practices (Blockchain-based Apps) - IT-Dimension, accessed April 29, 2025, https://it-dimension.com/blog/building-secure-and-scalable-dapps-challenges-and-best-practices-blockchain-based-apps/ CTO's Guide to Building Decentralized Applications [2025] - DigitalDefynd, accessed April 29, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/ctos-building-decentralized-applications/ Top Strategies to Build Decentralized Application for Enterprises, accessed April 29, 2025, https://amela.tech/top-strategies-to-build-decentralized-application-for-enterprises/ dApp Design Challenges 2024 | Overcoming Web3 Design Obstacles - Alien Design Studio, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.thealien.design/insights/dapp-design-challenges The Challenges of Developing Decentralized Apps and How to Overcome Them, accessed April 29, 2025, https://decentralizedapps.dev/article/The_Challenges_of_Developing_Decentralized_Apps_and_How_to_Overcome_Them.html Decentralized Data Storage: Pros, Cons and Prospects - PixelPlex, accessed April 29, 2025, https://pixelplex.io/blog/decentralized-storage/ Challenges in Decentralized Storage - Paris Blockchain Week, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.parisblockchainweek.com/post/challenges-in-decentralized-storage Decentralized Storage: Confronting the Challenges - HackerNoon, accessed April 29, 2025, https://hackernoon.com/decentralized-storage-confronting-the-challenges Adapting Consent Management to Decentralized Data Ecosystems - Secure Privacy, accessed April 29, 2025, https://secureprivacy.ai/blog/decentralized-data-consent-management IPFS conditional access control through ethereum smart contracts, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/43381/ipfs-conditional-access-control-through-ethereum-smart-contracts Decentralized Identity: The Ultimate Guide 2025 - Dock Labs, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.dock.io/post/decentralized-identity Decentralized Storage: A Game-Changer for Data Security and Privacy - BE Blockchain, accessed April 29, 2025, https://beblockchain.be/decentralized-storage/ Application-Defined Decentralized Access Control - Texas Computer Science, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~witchel/pubs/xu14atc-dcac.pdf Block Contributes Digital Identity Components to the Decentralized Identity Foundation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://block.xyz/inside/block-contributes-digital-identity-components-to-the-decentralized-identity-foundation Decentralized Storage with Access Control and Data Persistence for e-Book Stores - MDPI, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/12/406 The Best Decentralized Storage Solutions for Secure Data Management | Hivenet, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.hivenet.com/post/top-decentralized-storage-solutions-for-data-security-and-privacy Web Standards and the Emerging Decentralized ID Stack, accessed April 29, 2025, https://decentralized-id.com/web-standards/ What Is Decentralized Social Media? | Built In, accessed April 29, 2025, https://builtin.com/articles/decentralized-social-media Configuring your environment - Mastodon documentation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://docs.joinmastodon.org/admin/config/ Mastodon - Decentralized social media, accessed April 29, 2025, https://joinmastodon.org/ Transferring your Mastodon account to another server - Fedi.Tips, accessed April 29, 2025, https://fedi.tips/transferring-your-mastodon-account-to-another-server/ Moving or leaving accounts - Mastodon documentation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/ Migrate your Mastodon accounts from one server to another. - GitHub, accessed April 29, 2025, https://github.com/stefanbohacek/mastodon-account-migration Migrating to a new machine - Mastodon documentation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://docs.joinmastodon.org/admin/migrating/ Moving a Mastodon account to another server - Fabrizio Musacchio, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.fabriziomusacchio.com/blog/2022-12-28-mastodon_server_migration/ What Is a Social Graph's Role in Your Social Media Experience?, accessed April 29, 2025, https://onchain.org/magazine/what-is-a-social-graph-in-web3-desoc/ Decentralized Social on Ceramic Network, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ceramic.network/patterns/decentralized-social What is social graph? - Arianee, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.arianee.com/post/the-on-chain-social-graph DSNP - Project Liberty, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.projectliberty.io/dsnp/ Privacy-Preserving Analytics on Decentralized Social Graphs: The Case of Eigendecomposition | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361469710_Privacy-Preserving_Analytics_on_Decentralized_Social_Graphs_The_Case_of_Eigendecomposition Enforcing Privacy in Decentralized Mobile Social Networks - CEUR-WS.org, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1298/paper6.pdf Navigating Decentralized Online Social Networks: An Overview of Technical and Societal Challenges in Architectural Choices - arXiv, accessed April 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2504.00071v1 Sweets: A Decentralized Social Networking Service Application Using Data Synchronization on Mobile Devices (2016) | Rongchang Lai | 4 Citations - SciSpace, accessed April 29, 2025, https://scispace.com/papers/sweets-a-decentralized-social-networking-service-application-4102c3ceqn Privacy Issues in Decentralized Online Social Networks and other Decentralized Systems, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.csc.kth.se/~bgre/pub/Greschbach16_phdthesis.pdf Privacy Analysis and Protocols for Decentralized Online Social Networks - kth .diva, accessed April 29, 2025, https://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:808202/FULLTEXT01.pdf Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP) | Unfinished, accessed April 29, 2025, https://unfinished.com/wp-content/uploads/dsnp_whitepaper.pdf What is decentralized social media - Hostinger, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/what-is-decentralized-social-media Social Networks - Privacy Guides, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.privacyguides.org/en/social-networks/ What You Need to Know About Decentralized Social Networks | tulane, accessed April 29, 2025, https://sopa.tulane.edu/blog/decentralized-social-networks What are your thoughts on decentralized social networks? : r/socialmedia - Reddit, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/socialmedia/comments/11jx8jz/what_are_your_thoughts_on_decentralized_social/ Network and access configuration for Azure OpenAI On Your Data ..., accessed April 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/how-to/on-your-data-configuration Monitor Azure DNS | Microsoft Learn, accessed April 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/monitor-dns Configure DNS for Profiles - TechDocs - Broadcom Inc., accessed April 29, 2025, https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-sde/velocloud-sase/vmware-velocloud-sd-wan/5-1/configure-dns-for-profiles.html Best Practice DNS settings for a domain controller (VM) in Azure - Learn Microsoft, accessed April 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1504914/best-practice-dns-settings-for-a-domain-controller Email DNS configuration - OneSignal Documentation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://documentation.onesignal.com/docs/email-dns-configuration Basic DNS server configuration example | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.6.3 | Fortinet Document Library, accessed April 29, 2025, https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.6.3/administration-guide/612974/basic-dns-server-configuration-example 6.2.6 Connecting to the Server Using DNS SRV Records - MySQL :: Developer Zone, accessed April 29, 2025, https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.4/en/connecting-using-dns-srv.html How to Speed Up and Secure Your Apps Using DNS Load Balancing, accessed April 29, 2025, https://deploy.equinix.com/blog/using-dns-load-balancing-for-performance-and-security/ Speeding up HTTPS and HTTP/3 negotiation with... DNS - The Cloudflare Blog, accessed April 29, 2025, https://blog.cloudflare.com/speeding-up-https-and-http-3-negotiation-with-dns/ How to set up a DNS to use a catch-all address? - Server Fault, accessed April 29, 2025, https://serverfault.com/questions/175230/how-to-set-up-a-dns-to-use-a-catch-all-address 1. Introduction to DNS and BIND 9, accessed April 29, 2025, https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.18.14/chapter1.html How to Troubleshoot DNS Issues | Step-by-step Guide - Gcore, accessed April 29, 2025, https://gcore.com/learning/how-to-troubleshoot-dns-issues Common DNS issues and their Solutions | Insights Across Tech, Business, and Creativity. Inspiring Ideas and Practical Tips for Professionals | Futuramo Blog, accessed April 29, 2025, https://futuramo.com/blog/common-dns-issues-and-their-solutions/ How and Why to Change Your DNS Server (Hint: Faster, Safer Browsing) | PCMag, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/how-and-why-to-change-your-dns-server Configure Your DNS For Faster Internet Speed - YouTube, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqB5ArjC624 Cannot make/receive calls when using a Private DNS · Issue #9027 · signalapp/Signal-Android - GitHub, accessed April 29, 2025, https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/9027 Firewall and Internet settings - Signal Support, accessed April 29, 2025, https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007320291-Firewall-and-Internet-settings Recommendations for Domain Name System (DNS) client settings - Windows Server, accessed April 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/networking/best-practices-for-dns-client-settings 4 Options for saving user preferences - wking.dev, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.wking.dev/library/4-options-for-saving-user-preferences DNS Configuration: Everything You Need to Know - Hivelocity, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.hivelocity.net/kb/dns-configuration-everything-you-need-to-know/ What are the pros and cons of using an alternative DNS instead of the ISP DNS server?, accessed April 29, 2025, https://superuser.com/questions/424934/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-using-an-alternative-dns-instead-of-the-isp-dns-se Reasons why every DNS query should not be stored locally? : r/pihole - Reddit, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/ljfy7f/reasons_why_every_dns_query_should_not_be_stored/ DNS Over HTTPS (DoH): Definition, Key Benefits, and Potential Limitations - Indusface, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.indusface.com/learning/dns-over-https-doh/ 5 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using DNS In Networking | TinyDNS.org, accessed April 29, 2025, https://tinydns.org/advantages-and-disadvantages/ 15 DNS Best Practices for Security and Performance - phoenixNAP, accessed April 29, 2025, https://phoenixnap.com/kb/dns-best-practices-security Does changing DNS cause problems - Super User, accessed April 29, 2025, https://superuser.com/questions/1571898/does-changing-dns-cause-problems Be aware: Most of your devices are not respecting your DNS-settings : r/pihole - Reddit, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/w46spt/be_aware_most_of_your_devices_are_not_respecting/ FreeFileSync: Open Source File Synchronization & Backup Software, accessed April 29, 2025, https://freefilesync.org/ Be connected with Nextcloud Hub 9, accessed April 29, 2025, https://nextcloud.com/blog/nextcloud-hub9/ The 36 Best Collaboration Tools For Teams in 2025 - Hive, accessed April 29, 2025, https://hive.com/blog/collaboration-tools-for-teams/ Ethical Alternatives & Resources, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ethical.net/resources/ Nextcloud features that put you in control, accessed April 29, 2025, https://nextcloud.com/features/ Use DNS Discovery by default · Issue #517 · waku-org/js-waku - GitHub, accessed April 29, 2025, https://github.com/status-im/js-waku/issues/517 Adaptive DNS Discovery - IETF Datatracker, accessed April 29, 2025, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-add/"