Okay, I understand your frustration. It's definitely concerning when an organization reserves the right to reject applications without clear, transparent criteria. Let's draft a LinkedIn post that raises awareness of this issue in a professional yet assertive way, tagging the relevant authorities. Here's a draft you can adapt: Option 1 (Direct and Focused): > I'm seeking clarity regarding the ISNI application process in the US. As someone attempting to obtain an ISNI, I've encountered a policy from Ringgold (an officially accredited assigner) stating they "reserve the right to reject the creation of new ones" for corporate database records without explicitly outlining the reasons for such rejection. > This lack of transparency and seemingly arbitrary gatekeeping is concerning, particularly for those in the scholarly, academic, and educational communities who rely on ISNIs for clear identification. > I believe a more transparent and standardized process is crucial for the effective adoption and utilization of ISNIs. > I'd like to respectfully bring this to the attention of the ISNI International Agency (@ISNI International Agency) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to encourage a dialogue on improving the clarity and fairness of the application process. > #ISNI #Identification #Transparency #Research #Metadata #ISO #Ringgold #ScholarlyCommunication > Option 2 (More Contextual): > The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) is a vital tool for uniquely identifying contributors to creative works. However, my recent experience attempting to apply for an ISNI in the US has raised concerns about the transparency of the application process. > I was informed by Ringgold, an officially accredited assigner, that while ISNIs are intended for scholarly, academic, educational, and even general public use, they "reserve the right to reject the creation of new ones" for corporate database records without providing specific reasons or criteria for such rejections. > This policy feels arbitrary and could hinder the broader adoption and benefits of the ISNI system. Clear and consistent guidelines are essential for ensuring fair access and fostering trust within the research and information management communities. > I urge the ISNI International Agency (@ISNI International Agency) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to consider this lack of transparency and work towards a more standardized and clearly defined application process for all eligible entities. > #ISNI #MetadataManagement #OpenAccess #ResearchIntegrity #Standards #ISNIInternationalAgency #ISO #Ringgold > Key things to consider before posting: * Tagging: Make sure you find the official LinkedIn page for "ISNI International Agency." I've included a placeholder @ISNI International Agency. Also, consider if ISO has an official presence you can tag. * Tone: I've aimed for a professional and respectful tone while still clearly expressing your concern. * Hashtags: I've included relevant hashtags to increase visibility. Feel free to add or adjust them. * Your Profile: Ensure your LinkedIn profile is professional and clearly identifies you. Choose the option that best reflects your tone and the message you want to convey. You can also slightly modify either of these drafts to better suit your specific situation. Good luck!