Pattern and Structure Formation Research # Principles and Mechanisms of Pattern and Structure Formation Across Scales ## I. Introduction The universe, upon observation, reveals a striking departure from uniformity and randomness. Across an immense spectrum of scales, from the quantum foam hypothesized to underlie spacetime to the vast cosmic web of galaxies, intricate patterns and complex structures spontaneously emerge and persist.1 The ordered arrangements of atoms in a crystal, the delicate symmetry of a snowflake, the stripes and spots on an animal's coat 3, the spiral arms of galaxies 4, and the filamentary structure of galaxy clusters 5 all testify to a profound organizing tendency inherent in the laws of physics. Understanding the fundamental principles and mechanisms driving this spontaneous formation of order out of potentially chaotic or homogeneous initial states represents a central challenge and a unifying theme across diverse scientific disciplines.6 This report aims to provide a comprehensive, expert-level synthesis of the current understanding of pattern and structure formation across physical scales. It delves into the foundational mechanisms, such as instabilities, reaction-diffusion dynamics, symmetry breaking, and energy minimization principles, that initiate and shape patterns. The interplay between deterministic dynamics, chaotic sensitivity, and the crucial role of initial conditions versus ongoing processes, including feedback loops, will be examined. The specific roles of the four fundamental forces – gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces – in dictating structure at their relevant dominant scales are investigated. Furthermore, the report explores insights from the science of complex systems, including concepts like self-organization, criticality, and phase transitions, and their applicability to pattern formation in astrophysical, geological, and biological contexts, searching for universal behaviors and scaling laws. Specific examples will be detailed, focusing on the evolution of cosmological large-scale structure from the near-uniform early universe and the self-organized patterns observed in astrophysical environments beyond gravity's largest scales, such as galactic spiral arms, stellar jets, and planetary rings. The mathematical and theoretical tools employed to model and understand these phenomena – including partial differential equations (like reaction-diffusion and fluid dynamics equations), cellular automata, and network theory – will be evaluated, considering their strengths and limitations. Methods for quantifying the emergent order, drawing from information theory and complexity measures like entropy and algorithmic complexity, are discussed. Finally, the report touches upon the profound questions raised by the apparent non-randomness and fine-tuning observed in the universe, exploring concepts like the naturalness problem and the anthropic principle, before concluding with an outlook on future observational and experimental frontiers poised to deepen our understanding of nature's pattern-forming propensity. The ubiquitous nature of patterns across disparate scales itself suggests the possibility of underlying universal principles or mechanisms, even if a single, all-encompassing unified theory remains an aspiration.10 This pervasiveness motivates the exploration of cross-cutting concepts and frameworks throughout this report. The study inherently bridges fundamental physics, dynamics, mathematics, information theory, and philosophical considerations, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of this fundamental scientific quest.11 ## II. Foundational Mechanisms of Pattern Emergence The spontaneous emergence of patterns from initially homogeneous or disordered states is driven by several fundamental physical and mathematical mechanisms. These mechanisms often operate in systems driven far from thermodynamic equilibrium, where energy or matter flows allow for the sustained creation and maintenance of order. Instabilities as Drivers A primary route to pattern formation is through instabilities. Systems far from equilibrium can possess homogeneous states that, while perhaps stable under small, uniform perturbations, become unstable to perturbations with specific spatial or temporal characteristics. Linear stability analysis is a powerful tool for identifying these instabilities.16 When a control parameter (e.g., temperature gradient in convection, concentration of a reactant) crosses a critical threshold, the growth rate of certain modes (perturbations with specific wavelengths or frequencies) can become positive. These unstable modes grow exponentially, breaking the initial symmetry of the homogeneous state and establishing the rudimentary form of the pattern. The characteristics of the instability, such as the critical wavevector (q0​) and frequency (ω0​) of the fastest-growing mode, determine the initial length and time scales of the emergent pattern.16 Examples abound in hydrodynamic systems like thermal convection and Taylor-Couette flow, as well as in chemical reactions and solidification fronts.16 Reaction-Diffusion Systems and the Turing Mechanism A paradigmatic mechanism for spatial pattern formation, particularly relevant in chemical and biological systems, is the reaction-diffusion instability, famously proposed by Alan Turing.3 Turing demonstrated that a system of interacting chemical species (morphogens) diffusing at different rates could spontaneously develop spatial patterns even from an initially uniform state.3 The canonical Turing mechanism involves at least two species: a short-range activator that promotes its own production and that of a long-range inhibitor, which suppresses the activator.19 If the inhibitor diffuses significantly faster than the activator, small local increases in the activator can grow (due to self-activation) before being suppressed by the slowly arriving inhibitor, while the inhibitor spreads rapidly to suppress activation in surrounding regions. This competition between local activation and long-range inhibition can destabilize the homogeneous state and lead to stationary spatial patterns like spots, stripes, or labyrinths.13 Turing's ideas, initially overlooked, gained traction through theoretical work and experimental verification in chemical systems like the Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ) reaction and the chlorite-iodide-malonic acid (CDIMA) reaction.3 They have become a cornerstone for explaining pattern formation in developmental biology, such as animal coat patterns (leopard spots, zebra stripes), limb development, and feather bud formation.3 More recently, reaction-diffusion principles have been applied to intracellular pattern formation, such as the positioning of protein clusters essential for cell division (e.g., Min proteins in E. coli).26 However, intracellular applications often require modifications to the classic activator-inhibitor framework, emphasizing the redistribution of proteins between different states (e.g., membrane-bound vs. cytosolic) and directed transport via diffusion along gradients, rather than simple substrate depletion or inhibition.26 While powerful, reaction-diffusion models have limitations. Predicting the specific pattern selected (e.g., spots vs. stripes) far from the initial instability threshold remains challenging.18 Real biological systems involve numerous interacting components and complex, heterogeneous environments, far exceeding the simplicity of early models.3 Furthermore, numerical simulations can be computationally intensive, especially for large systems or stiff reaction kinetics, and finding inhomogeneous solutions can be sensitive to initial conditions.13 Symmetry Breaking Pattern formation is intrinsically linked to the concept of symmetry breaking. Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) occurs when the lowest energy state (ground state or vacuum state) or the stable dynamical state of a system possesses less symmetry than the underlying physical laws or equations governing it.29 A classic analogy is a ball placed perfectly atop a symmetric hill with a circular trough at the bottom; the initial state is rotationally symmetric, but the ball inevitably rolls down into one specific point in the trough, breaking this symmetry.30 SSB is fundamental across physics. In particle physics, the Higgs mechanism involves SSB of the electroweak gauge symmetry, giving mass to W and Z bosons while the underlying Lagrangian remains symmetric.29 In condensed matter physics, phase transitions like ferromagnetism involve the spontaneous alignment of spins below the Curie temperature, breaking rotational symmetry.31 In pattern-forming systems, SSB is the process by which a uniform, symmetric state transitions into a structured, less symmetric state. Examples include: - Buckling: A thin elastic sheet under uniform compression (symmetric state) buckles into a wrinkled or folded configuration (reduced symmetry) because bending is energetically cheaper than uniform compression.31 - Fluid Convection: When a fluid layer heated from below becomes unstable, the uniform conductive state breaks down into patterned convection rolls (e.g., Rayleigh-Bénard convection), breaking translational symmetry.31 - Reaction-Diffusion: The emergence of Turing patterns breaks the translational and rotational symmetry of the initial homogeneous state.31 - Biological Polarity: The establishment of a distinct front and back or top and bottom in a cell (e.g., yeast cell polarity driven by Cdc42 clusters) breaks the initial spherical symmetry.32 - Active Matter: Systems of self-propelled particles can spontaneously form ordered states like polar waves or nematic bands, breaking rotational and translational symmetries.33 - Photonic Time Crystals: Nonlinear interactions in periodically modulated optical media can lead to states with broken spatial and time translation symmetries, forming lattice-like wave patterns.34 SSB is distinct from Explicit Symmetry Breaking (ESB), where the governing equations themselves lack a particular symmetry due to an external field or specific term in the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian.29 In SSB, the laws are symmetric, but the realized state is not; the system "chooses" one specific configuration from a set of equally possible, symmetry-related states.29 This spontaneous choice is often triggered by infinitesimal noise or fluctuations. Energy Minimization Principles Many structures in nature form because they represent configurations of minimum energy. Physical systems tend to evolve towards states that minimize their potential energy or, more generally, their free energy (in thermodynamic systems). This principle drives structure formation across various scales: - Molecular Geometry: The specific bond lengths and angles in a molecule like water are those that minimize the electronic energy and inter-atomic forces.37 Computational chemistry heavily relies on energy minimization algorithms (e.g., steepest descent, conjugate gradient) to find stable molecular conformations.38 - Crystal Lattices: Atoms arrange themselves into regular, periodic lattices in solids because these configurations minimize the overall potential energy of interaction. - Material Microstructures: Patterns like wrinkling in thin films 41, branching domain structures in magnets or martensitic materials 41, and phase separation in alloys arise from the competition between different energy contributions (e.g., bulk energy, surface/interface energy, elastic energy). The system adopts a patterned state to minimize the total energy, often involving the formation of interfaces or gradients penalized by higher-order energy terms with small prefactors (related to material properties like thickness or surface tension).41 These small parameters often set the characteristic length scale of the pattern.41 - Self-Assembled Structures: Complex structures can self-assemble through energy minimization, as demonstrated in models of dielectric elastomer actuators where a prestretched elastomer combined with an elastic frame forms complex 3D shapes by minimizing the combined elastic energy.43 Similar principles govern the formation of domains in type-I superconductors in a magnetic field, where the system minimizes a combination of bulk magnetic energy and surface energy associated with the normal-superconducting interface.42 The energy landscape of complex systems can be rugged, with many local minima corresponding to metastable states.42 The final structure often depends on the system's history and the path taken during the minimization process. Computational methods are essential for exploring these landscapes and finding low-energy configurations.37 Unifying Concepts While a single Unified Field Theory (UFT) successfully describing all forces and particles remains an open pursuit 10, the mechanisms discussed above – instability, reaction-diffusion, symmetry breaking, and energy minimization – provide powerful, cross-cutting concepts for understanding pattern formation. The very existence of patterns across diverse systems, from biology 3 to hydrodynamics 16 and materials science 41, suggests common underlying principles at play. These mechanisms are often intertwined: Turing patterns arise from a diffusion-driven instability that breaks spatial symmetry 3; wrinkling involves energy minimization leading to buckling, a form of symmetry breaking.31 The dominant mechanism is often scale-dependent: reaction-diffusion is key at cellular scales 26, while energy minimization governs material structures 41 and gravity shapes cosmic patterns (discussed later). While these physical and mathematical mechanisms provide a robust framework, some theoretical explorations propose incorporating non-standard concepts like 'mind' or consciousness, suggesting limitations to purely materialistic explanations for certain complex phenomena, although such ideas remain highly speculative and outside the mainstream scientific consensus.44 The focus here remains on established physical principles. ## III. Determinism, Chaos, and the Role of Dynamics The emergence of patterns raises fundamental questions about predictability and the relative importance of initial conditions versus ongoing dynamical processes. Are the intricate structures we observe predetermined by the universe's initial state, or are they shaped primarily by the complex interplay of forces, instabilities, and feedback mechanisms acting over time? Initial Conditions vs. Dynamics: The Role of Chaos Classical deterministic systems are, in principle, predictable if their initial state and governing laws are known precisely. However, many systems exhibiting pattern formation are nonlinear, opening the door to chaotic dynamics.12 Chaos theory reveals that even simple deterministic nonlinear systems can exhibit extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, a phenomenon popularly known as the "butterfly effect".12 An infinitesimally small change in the starting state can lead to exponentially diverging trajectories in the system's phase space, rendering long-term prediction practically impossible.12 Examples include the double-rod pendulum, where slight variations in starting position lead to vastly different motions 12, and weather forecasting, where tiny errors in initial measurements grow rapidly, limiting forecast horizons.21 This inherent sensitivity might suggest that patterns are entirely dictated by the precise, unknowable details of the initial state. However, the relationship is more nuanced. While the specific evolution path taken by a chaotic system is highly sensitive, the range of possible long-term behaviors is often constrained by the system's dynamics. Nonlinear systems frequently possess attractors – specific states or regions in phase space towards which the system tends to evolve, regardless of the exact starting point (within a given basin of attraction).21 Pattern formation often corresponds to the system settling into such an attractor state, which represents an ordered configuration like convection rolls 16 or Turing patterns.22 Thus, a fundamental tension exists: chaotic dynamics introduce unpredictability at the micro-level of specific trajectories, yet the same dynamics can guide the system towards a limited set of ordered, macroscopic patterns.12 The dynamics can effectively channel the sensitive dependence on initial conditions into the selection of a particular pattern from a repertoire defined by the system's parameters and governing equations.19 Instabilities as Amplifiers Instabilities play a crucial role in bridging the gap between microscopic fluctuations and macroscopic patterns. As discussed earlier (Section II), systems driven away from equilibrium can become unstable to perturbations.16 These instabilities act as powerful amplifiers for any initial inhomogeneity, whether arising from thermal noise, quantum fluctuations, or slight variations in initial conditions.16 A tiny perturbation corresponding to an unstable mode grows exponentially, rapidly dominating the system's dynamics and imposing its characteristic length or time scale onto the emerging structure.16 Examples include Turing instabilities driven by differential diffusion 19, hydrodynamic instabilities like Rayleigh-Bénard convection 16, and parametric wave instabilities.16 The type of instability dictates the nature of the initial pattern; for instance, stationary instabilities (ω0​=0,q0​=0) lead to spatially periodic patterns, while oscillatory instabilities (ω0​=0) can lead to patterns periodic in both space and time.16 The Organizing Power of Feedback Loops Feedback loops, where the output of a process influences its own input, are ubiquitous in pattern-forming systems and are central to nonlinear dynamics.21 They can be categorized as: - Positive Feedback: Amplifies deviations from a reference state. This can drive instabilities and exponential growth, leading to runaway effects or pattern formation. Examples include Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release (CICR) in biological cells, where released calcium triggers further release 19, or the ice-albedo feedback in climate change, where melting ice reduces reflectivity, causing more warming and further melting.21 - Negative Feedback: Counteracts deviations, promoting stability or oscillations. Examples include thermostat regulation 21 or predator-prey cycles where an increase in predators leads to a decrease in prey, subsequently reducing the predator population.21 Feedback loops are critical not only for driving instabilities but also for selecting and stabilizing the resulting patterns. The interplay between positive and negative feedback is often essential. For instance, the Turing mechanism relies on local positive feedback (activation) coupled with long-range negative feedback (inhibition).19 Furthermore, the timing of feedback can be crucial. Delayed Global Feedback (DGF), where a measure of the system's overall state at a previous time influences current local dynamics, has been shown to significantly impact pattern selection and stability in periodically forced excitable media, such as chemical oscillators and biological systems like cardiac cells.19 In models of cardiac calcium dynamics, the sign of the DGF (determined by how calcium changes affect subsequent electrical activity) can determine whether spatially synchronized (Con-P2) or desynchronized (Dis-P2) patterns are stable.19 Negative DGF tends to stabilize spatially uniform patterns, while positive DGF can permit spatially complex, random-looking patterns, although constrained by the global feedback.19 This demonstrates that feedback acts as an active control mechanism, shaping the emergent structure beyond simply amplifying initial noise. Pattern Selection: A Complex Interplay The final pattern observed in a system often results from a complex interplay between initial conditions, system parameters, boundary conditions, and the dynamics of instabilities and feedback loops. - Parameters: As system parameters (e.g., reaction rates, diffusion coefficients, driving forces) are varied, the system can undergo bifurcations, which are qualitative changes in behavior.21 These bifurcations can mark the onset of pattern formation or transitions between different types of patterns (e.g., from stable equilibrium to oscillations to chaos in the logistic map 21). - Initial Conditions: While dynamics often guide systems towards attractors, the specific attractor reached (and thus the resulting pattern) can depend on the initial state, especially if multiple stable patterns are possible for the same parameters.19 Spatially random initial conditions can lead to spatially random patterns in some systems.19 - Boundaries: The geometry and boundary conditions of the system domain significantly influence pattern formation, often selecting specific modes or orientations.16 - Instability Interactions: Multiple instabilities can be present simultaneously or arise sequentially, leading to complex, potentially chaotic or spatio-temporally varying patterns.23 In conclusion, while sensitivity to initial conditions is a hallmark of many pattern-forming systems, the emergent structures are not solely dictated by the starting state. Ongoing dynamical processes, particularly the amplification of fluctuations by instabilities and the guiding/selecting influence of feedback loops, play a decisive role in shaping the final patterns and determining their characteristics. ## IV. Shaping Structures: The Role of Fundamental Forces The diverse patterns and structures observed throughout the universe, from the subatomic to the cosmic, are ultimately sculpted by the interplay of the four fundamental forces of nature: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces.11 Each force dominates at specific scales and governs particular types of interactions, yet their combined action is responsible for the existence and stability of all matter and structure. Overview and Scale Dependence The four forces exhibit vastly different strengths and ranges, which dictates their spheres of influence.11 1. Strong Nuclear Force: The strongest force, responsible for binding quarks together to form protons and neutrons (hadrons), and for holding protons and neutrons together within atomic nuclei.10 It operates only over extremely short distances, comparable to the size of a nucleus (∼10−15 m).11 It is mediated by gluons.10 2. Electromagnetic (EM) Force: Acts between electrically charged particles, binding electrons to nuclei to form atoms, and atoms together to form molecules.11 It governs electricity, magnetism, and light. It is significantly weaker than the strong force but has an infinite range.11 It is mediated by photons.10 3. Weak Nuclear Force: Responsible for certain types of radioactive decay (like beta decay) and interactions involving neutrinos and quarks.10 It can change the flavor of quarks (e.g., turning a neutron into a proton). It operates over even shorter distances than the strong force (∼10−18 m) and is weaker than both the strong and EM forces.11 It is mediated by massive W and Z bosons.10 4. Gravitational Force: The weakest force, but dominant on large astronomical scales due to its infinite range and universally attractive nature (acting on all mass and energy).11 It governs the motion of planets, stars, and galaxies, and shapes the large-scale structure of the universe.11 It is described by general relativity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.11 Its mediating particle, the graviton, is hypothetical.53 This hierarchy of strength and range directly links the forces to the scales of the patterns they primarily generate.11 Nuclear forces shape the structure within atomic nuclei, electromagnetism governs atomic and molecular structures, and gravity orchestrates the cosmic tapestry. Specific Roles in Structure Formation - Nuclear Forces (Strong and Weak): These forces are crucial for the very existence of atomic nuclei beyond hydrogen. The strong force provides the binding energy that holds protons and neutrons together, overcoming the electromagnetic repulsion between positively charged protons.48 This stability is fundamental to the existence of all chemical elements heavier than hydrogen. The weak force governs nuclear processes like beta decay, enabling the transformation of neutrons into protons (and vice versa) and playing a critical role in stellar nucleosynthesis – the process by which stars fuse lighter elements into heavier ones, creating the building blocks for planets and life.11 The short range of these forces confines their direct structural influence to the nuclear scale (∼10−15 m).11 - Electromagnetism: This force dictates the structure of atoms by binding negatively charged electrons to positively charged nuclei.11 It governs chemical bonding, allowing atoms to combine into molecules and complex materials, forming the basis of chemistry and biology.11 While powerful, its influence on macroscopic astronomical structures is often limited because large objects tend to be electrically neutral, with positive and negative charges cancelling out.11 However, electromagnetic forces are dominant in plasmas and play roles in phenomena like stellar jets (see Section VII). At the scales of atoms and molecules (∼10−10 m and larger), EM completely dominates the nuclear forces.52 - Gravity: Despite its intrinsic weakness, gravity dominates structure formation on astronomical and cosmological scales.11 Its infinite range and the fact that mass is always additive (unlike electric charge) mean its effects accumulate over vast distances and large masses.52 Gravity drives the collapse of gas clouds to form stars and planets, binds stars into galaxies, holds galaxies together in clusters, and orchestrates the formation of the large-scale cosmic web.11 As described by general relativity, gravity also shapes spacetime itself.11 Interplay, Balance, and Unification Structures exist because of a balance or competition between these forces. Atomic nuclei are stable because the short-range strong force overcomes the EM repulsion between protons.48 Stars form when gravity overcomes the outward pressure of gas and radiation. The large-scale structure of the universe reflects a cosmic competition between the attractive force of gravity (dominated by dark matter) and the repulsive effect of dark energy driving cosmic expansion.54 The very existence of stable matter relies on this intricate balance. Physics has seen successful unification of forces, starting with Maxwell's unification of electricity and magnetism into electromagnetism.10 Later, the electromagnetic and weak forces were unified into the electroweak force, understood as different manifestations of the same interaction at high energies.52 The ongoing quest in theoretical physics is to develop Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) that unify the electroweak and strong forces, and ultimately a Theory of Everything (ToE) that incorporates gravity, potentially reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics.10 Such unification is expected to occur at extremely high energies, such as those present in the very early universe 49, suggesting the forces may not have been distinct in the universe's nascent moments. Understanding this potential unification is key to comprehending the earliest stages of structure formation. ## V. Insights from Complexity Science The study of pattern formation benefits immensely from the perspectives and tools developed within the broader field of complexity science. This interdisciplinary field investigates systems characterized by numerous interacting components, nonlinearity, feedback, and emergent behavior – properties common to many pattern-forming systems across physics, biology, and social sciences.1 Key concepts from complexity science, such as self-organization, criticality, phase transitions, and universality, provide powerful frameworks for understanding how order arises and evolves. Complex Systems and Emergence Complex systems are defined by the collective behavior that emerges from the interactions of their constituent parts (often called agents).1 This emergent behavior is often counter-intuitive and cannot be simply extrapolated from the properties of the individual components.1 Examples range from the intricate structures formed by molecules 2 and cells 2 to the collective dynamics of ecosystems 56, economies 6, cities 8, and the Internet.56 Nonlinear interactions and feedback loops are typically crucial for generating this complexity.1 Self-Organization: Order from Local Interactions Self-organization refers to the spontaneous emergence of global patterns, coordination, or structure from the local interactions among the components of an initially disordered system, typically operating far from thermodynamic equilibrium and requiring energy input.1 A key feature is the absence of external control or a central blueprint; order arises autonomously from the bottom up.1 Examples are diverse: - Physics: Lasers achieving coherent light emission 59, convection cells forming in heated fluids 59, sandpile dynamics.61 - Chemistry: Oscillating reactions like the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction forming spatio-temporal patterns.16 - Biology: Flocking birds or schooling fish achieving coordinated movement 59, ants building complex nests through local pheromone trails 1, protein patterns forming within cells 26, vegetation patterns in arid landscapes.7 - Social Systems: Pedestrian dynamics, opinion formation, market behavior.2 Self-organization provides a powerful conceptual bridge linking microscopic rules and interactions to the emergence of macroscopic order and patterns.1 It explains how complexity can arise spontaneously, offering a mechanism distinct from top-down design or external imposition.6 This bottom-up perspective is fundamental to understanding pattern formation in many natural systems. Criticality and Self-Organized Criticality (SOC) Criticality, in the context of statistical physics, refers to the state of a system at a phase transition point. Self-Organized Criticality (SOC) extends this concept to dynamical systems that naturally evolve towards and maintain such a critical state without requiring precise tuning of external parameters.62 The critical state acts as an attractor for the system's dynamics.62 Systems exhibiting SOC display characteristic features: - Scale Invariance: Fluctuations or events (often termed "avalanches") occur across all scales, with their size or frequency distributions typically following power laws.62 This indicates the absence of a characteristic scale. - 1/f Noise (Flicker Noise): The power spectrum of temporal fluctuations often exhibits a 1/fβ dependence, where β is close to 1.64 - Fractal Structure: The spatial organization of the system or the patterns generated may exhibit fractal geometry.62 Canonical models illustrating SOC include: - Sandpile Models: Introduced by Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (BTW).62 Sand grains are added randomly to a grid; when a site exceeds a threshold, it "topples," distributing grains to neighbors, potentially triggering cascades or avalanches of all sizes.61 - Forest-Fire Models: Trees grow randomly on a grid and are ignited by random sparks. Fires spread to neighbors, creating "avalanches" of burning clusters whose sizes follow power laws.62 - Slider-Block Models: Used as analogies for earthquakes, where blocks connected by springs slip intermittently when stress exceeds a threshold.62 SOC has been proposed as a mechanism underlying complexity in numerous natural systems, including earthquakes, landslides 61, solar flares 62, astrophysical accretion processes 66, brain activity 59, species extinctions, and epidemics.61 However, the universality and precise conditions for SOC remain subjects of ongoing research and debate, with some experimental findings challenging the simplest model predictions.62 Critical states, whether reached through fine-tuning or self-organization, represent systems poised at a delicate balance, often exhibiting maximal complexity, long-range correlations, and heightened sensitivity to perturbations.62 In SOC systems, this poised state allows small, local events to potentially trigger system-wide responses (avalanches).61 This suggests that operating near criticality might confer advantages for systems requiring adaptability, efficient information processing, or robustness across scales. Phase Transitions, Universality, and Scaling Laws Phase transitions mark abrupt, qualitative changes in the state of a system as an external parameter (like temperature or pressure) is varied. Examples include melting/freezing, boiling/condensation, and the transition from paramagnetic to ferromagnetic behavior.29 Continuous (or second-order) phase transitions are particularly relevant to pattern formation and complexity, as they are associated with the emergence of long-range correlations and scale invariance precisely at the critical point.70 A key concept associated with continuous phase transitions is universality.70 It posits that the macroscopic behavior of systems near their critical point depends only on fundamental properties like the dimensionality of space and the symmetries of the order parameter, rather than on the microscopic details of the interactions.71 Systems belonging to the same universality class share the same set of critical exponents, which describe how various physical quantities (like correlation length, susceptibility, specific heat, order parameter) diverge or vanish as the critical point is approached.70 These relationships are expressed through scaling laws, which are often power laws.70 The renormalization group provides the theoretical underpinning for universality, showing how microscopic details become irrelevant under coarse-graining near a critical fixed point.71 The concepts of universality and scaling have been extended beyond equilibrium systems to describe non-equilibrium phase transitions, such as those in driven systems or systems undergoing dynamic processes like quenching across a critical point.71 The Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM), for example, predicts universal scaling laws for the density of topological defects (like domain walls or vortices) formed when a system is driven through a phase transition at a finite rate, relating defect density to the quench rate.70 Universality provides a powerful simplification, allowing physicists to classify diverse critical phenomena and make predictions based on general principles without needing to know every microscopic detail.71 ## VI. The Grand Tapestry: Cosmological Structure Formation One of the most profound examples of structure formation occurs on the largest scales, where the initially smooth, hot, dense early universe evolved over 13.8 billion years into the intricate cosmic web of galaxies, clusters, filaments, and voids we observe today.5 Understanding this process is a cornerstone of modern cosmology, and the standard Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) model provides a remarkably successful framework.54 The Initial State: Near Uniformity Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) – the relic radiation from about 380,000 years after the Big Bang – reveal a universe that was extraordinarily homogeneous and isotropic at that time.54 The temperature fluctuations in the CMB are tiny, only about one part in 100,000. Yet, these minuscule variations were the seeds from which all cosmic structure eventually grew. Inflationary Origins of Perturbations The leading theory for the origin of these primordial density fluctuations is cosmic inflation.82 Inflation proposes a period of extremely rapid, exponential expansion of space occurring a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang.83 During this epoch, driven by the potential energy of a hypothetical scalar field (the inflaton), the universe expanded by an enormous factor. This solves several long-standing cosmological puzzles, such as why the universe appears flat and homogeneous on large scales (the flatness and horizon problems).83 Crucially, inflation provides a mechanism for generating the initial density perturbations.82 According to quantum field theory, even in empty space, quantum fields constantly undergo fluctuations. During inflation, these microscopic quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field (and the spacetime metric itself) were stretched to astrophysical scales by the exponential expansion.83 Regions where the inflaton field fluctuated slightly differently exited the inflationary phase at slightly different times, leading to minute variations in energy density across space.85 These inflation-generated perturbations are predicted to be nearly scale-invariant and Gaussian, characteristics consistent with CMB observations and the distribution of large-scale structure (LSS).83 This represents a remarkable connection, suggesting the largest structures in the universe originated from quantum effects in the primordial cosmos.82 Gravitational Instability: The Engine of Growth Once inflation ended, the universe was filled with a hot plasma of particles and radiation, permeated by these tiny density fluctuations. The primary engine driving the growth of structure from these seeds is gravitational instability.54 Regions that were slightly denser than average exerted a slightly stronger gravitational pull, attracting more matter from their surroundings. This caused these regions to become even denser, enhancing their gravitational attraction further in a positive feedback loop. Conversely, underdense regions became progressively emptier as matter flowed away towards the denser areas. Over billions of years, this process amplified the initial small perturbations into the massive structures we see today. The Lambda-CDM Model: Ingredients for Structure The standard ΛCDM model provides the cosmological context and ingredients for this gravitational growth.54 It posits that the universe's energy density is currently dominated by two mysterious components: 1. Cold Dark Matter (CDM): An invisible, non-baryonic form of matter that interacts primarily (or perhaps solely) through gravity.5 It constitutes about 85% of the total matter density (or ~27% of the total energy density).5 "Cold" means it was moving slowly in the early universe. 2. Dark Energy (Λ): A component with negative pressure, causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate.54 It constitutes about 68% of the total energy density.5 In the simplest ΛCDM model, dark energy is represented by Einstein's cosmological constant (Λ), interpreted as the energy density of the vacuum.54 Ordinary matter (baryons – protons, neutrons, electrons) makes up only about 5% of the universe's energy density.5 ΛCDM has been highly successful in explaining a wide range of observations, including the CMB anisotropies, the large-scale distribution of galaxies, the abundances of light elements, and the accelerating expansion indicated by Type Ia supernovae.54 However, it faces challenges, including the unknown nature of dark matter and dark energy, the cosmological constant fine-tuning problem 78, the coincidence problem (why dark matter and dark energy densities are comparable today), and tensions between different cosmological measurements (e.g., the Hubble constant tension).78 The Crucial Role of Dark Matter Dark matter plays an indispensable role in structure formation within the ΛCDM framework.5 Because dark matter does not interact significantly with photons, its density perturbations could begin to grow via gravitational instability much earlier than baryonic matter perturbations.5 In the early, hot universe, baryons were tightly coupled to photons through electromagnetic interactions, and the resulting radiation pressure prevented baryonic structures from collapsing until the universe cooled sufficiently for neutral atoms to form (recombination, the epoch of the CMB). Dark matter, unaffected by this pressure, started collapsing into gravitational potential wells, forming extended "halos".5 After recombination, baryons were free to fall into these pre-existing dark matter halos, which acted as gravitational scaffolding, greatly accelerating the formation of galaxies and clusters.5 Without dark matter, the observed structures would not have had enough time to form from the small initial perturbations seen in the CMB. The dominance of the invisible dark sector is thus paramount: dark matter dictates where and when structures form. The Influence of Dark Energy Dark energy influences structure formation primarily through its effect on the expansion history of the universe.54 While gravity pulls matter together, dark energy drives an accelerated expansion, effectively working against gravitational collapse on the largest scales.54 In the early universe, matter density was much higher, and gravity dominated, allowing structures to grow hierarchically. However, as the universe expanded, matter density decreased, and dark energy eventually became the dominant component (a few billion years ago). Since then, the accelerating expansion has significantly slowed down the growth rate of the most massive structures, like galaxy clusters, and prevents the formation of new, larger bound systems.54 Dark energy thus shapes the ultimate scale and evolution of the cosmic web. Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): A Standard Ruler Before recombination, the tightly coupled photons and baryons formed a relativistic fluid where pressure waves (sound waves) could propagate.91 These waves originated from the initial density perturbations. As the universe expanded and cooled, these sound waves traveled outwards until recombination occurred (~380,000 years after the Big Bang). At recombination, photons decoupled from baryons, effectively "freezing" the sound waves in place.91 This process imprinted a characteristic length scale – the distance a sound wave could travel before recombination (the sound horizon, roughly 150 Megaparsecs today) – into the distribution of both baryons and, through gravitational coupling, dark matter.91 This preferred scale manifests as a slight excess probability of finding pairs of galaxies separated by the sound horizon distance. This feature, known as Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), acts as a "standard ruler" in the LSS, allowing cosmologists to measure the expansion history of the universe and probe the nature of dark energy.91 The Cosmic Web The combined action of inflation-generated perturbations, gravitational instability primarily driven by dark matter, and the modulating influence of dark energy results in the large-scale structure known as the cosmic web.5 This structure is characterized by: - Voids: Large, underdense regions largely empty of galaxies. - Sheets: Flattened, wall-like structures bounding the voids. - Filaments: Thread-like structures formed at the intersection of sheets, containing most of the galaxies. - Nodes (Clusters): Dense regions located at the intersection of filaments, hosting large galaxy clusters. This hierarchical structure formed bottom-up, with smaller dark matter halos merging over time to form larger ones, dragging baryons along to form the galaxies and clusters we observe within this vast cosmic network.5 ## VII. Patterns in the Heavens: Astrophysical Self-Organization Beyond the grand scale of cosmological structure, the universe exhibits a wealth of self-organized patterns within astrophysical systems. Gravity remains a key player, but other forces, particularly electromagnetism, along with complex gas dynamics (hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics), drive the formation of structures like galactic spiral arms, stellar jets, and planetary rings. These phenomena often involve intricate feedback loops and instabilities operating far from equilibrium. Galactic Spiral Arms: Waves and Starbursts Spiral arms are perhaps the most visually striking features of disk galaxies like our own Milky Way.4 They appear as luminous lanes winding outwards from the galactic center or bar, characterized by higher concentrations of gas, dust, and young, bright stars, indicating active star formation.4 Two primary theories attempt to explain their origin and persistence, particularly addressing the "winding problem" – the fact that arms would quickly wind up tightly if they were simply material structures co-rotating with the differentially rotating disk.4 1. Density Wave Theory: Proposed by Lin and Shu 92, this theory posits that spiral arms are quasi-static, long-lived density waves – regions of enhanced gravitational potential and matter density – that propagate through the stellar and gaseous disk.4 Stars and gas clouds pass through these waves, slowing down and bunching up temporarily within the arm (analogous to a traffic jam), before moving on.92 The density wave pattern itself rotates more slowly than the inner disk stars but faster than the outer ones, maintaining its spiral shape over long periods.4 The increased density within the wave compresses interstellar gas clouds, triggering star formation and explaining the prevalence of young stars and HII regions in the arms.4 The compression can also lead to shock waves, visible as dark dust lanes often seen along the inner edges of spiral arms.4 Density waves are thought to be generated and sustained by gravitational instabilities in the disk, potentially amplified by galactic bars or tidal interactions with satellite galaxies.4 This theory is particularly successful at explaining the large-scale, symmetric "grand design" spiral patterns.4 2. Stochastic Self-Propagating Star Formation (SSPSF) Model: This model views spiral arms as transient, fragmented features arising from localized bursts of star formation.4 Intense star formation in one region, perhaps triggered by a supernova explosion, creates massive stars whose radiation and subsequent supernovae compress surrounding gas, triggering further star formation in adjacent regions.4 Due to the galaxy's differential rotation (inner parts rotate faster than outer parts), these regions of propagating star formation are sheared into short spiral segments.4 The continuous, somewhat random occurrence of these events throughout the disk leads to a patchy, "flocculent" spiral pattern composed of many short arm fragments.4 This mechanism primarily explains the appearance of flocculent galaxies and emphasizes the role of stellar feedback in shaping galactic structure. It is likely that both mechanisms operate in nature, possibly even within the same galaxy, with density waves potentially organizing the large-scale structure and SSPSF contributing to the features within the arms.94 Stellar Jets: Magnetized Outflows from Accretion Disks Collimated jets of plasma are observed emanating from various accreting astrophysical objects, including young stellar objects (protostars) and compact objects like black holes and neutron stars in binary systems or at the centers of active galaxies (AGNs).95 These jets are powerful phenomena, transporting energy and momentum far from their source. Their formation is intimately linked to the presence of accretion disks and magnetic fields.96 Matter falling towards a central object rarely falls straight in; instead, due to conservation of angular momentum, it typically forms a rotating accretion disk.96 As matter spirals inwards through the disk, friction (viscosity, often driven by magnetohydrodynamic turbulence like the Magneto-Rotational Instability, MRI 100) causes it to heat up and lose angular momentum, allowing it to accrete onto the central object. This process releases vast amounts of gravitational potential energy, powering luminous emission.96 The currently favored models for launching and collimating jets rely on Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), the study of electrically conducting fluids (plasmas) interacting with magnetic fields.96 Magnetic field lines, anchored either in the rotating accretion disk or the rotating central object itself, act like channels or conduits. As the disk/object rotates, these field lines are twisted into a helical configuration. Plasma loaded onto these field lines is then accelerated outwards and collimated into a jet by a combination of magnetic pressure gradients and centrifugal forces acting along the rotating field lines. Key mechanisms include: - Blandford-Payne (BP) Mechanism: A magnetocentrifugal wind launched from the surface of the accretion disk.96 The magnetic field extracts angular momentum from the disk, allowing accretion to proceed while simultaneously driving an outflow. This is thought to be relevant for jets from protostars and possibly some AGN. - Blandford-Znajek (BZ) Mechanism: Applicable to rotating black holes, this mechanism extracts the black hole's rotational energy via magnetic fields threading its ergosphere.95 The rotating spacetime twists the magnetic field lines, creating powerful electromagnetic fields that drive relativistic, Poynting-flux dominated jets. This is considered a likely engine for the most powerful jets seen from AGN and gamma-ray bursts.95 Modeling these processes accurately requires sophisticated numerical simulations, often incorporating general relativity (GRMHD) for systems involving black holes.96 These simulations confirm the viability of MHD mechanisms in producing powerful, collimated jets.96 Laboratory experiments creating MHD-driven plasma jets also provide valuable insights and validation for astrophysical models.101 The interplay of gravity (driving accretion), rotation, and magnetic fields via MHD processes appears to be a fundamental engine for generating some of the most energetic, structured outflows in the universe. Planetary Ring Systems: Dynamics of Dust and Ice The giant planets in our Solar System (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune) are all adorned with ring systems, composed of countless individual particles ranging from dust grains to boulder-sized objects, primarily made of water ice.102 Saturn's rings are the most spectacular and well-studied.103 Their formation is thought to result either from the tidal disruption of a moon that strayed too close to the planet (inside the Roche limit) or from material that failed to coalesce into a moon during the planet's formation.102 The intricate structures observed within rings – gaps, ringlets, waves, sharp edges – are sculpted by a complex interplay of gravitational forces, collisions, and resonances.102 Key dynamical processes include: - Keplerian Shear: Particles closer to the planet orbit faster than those farther out, leading to constant shearing motion within the rings.102 - Collisions: Frequent, gentle collisions between ring particles dissipate energy and angular momentum, leading to viscous spreading and damping of eccentricities/inclinations, effectively acting like a fluid viscosity.102 - Gravitational Resonances: Moons orbiting near or within the rings exert periodic gravitational tugs on ring particles. When a particle's orbital period is in a simple integer ratio (e.g., 2:1, 3:2) with a moon's period, these tugs occur repeatedly at the same point in the particle's orbit, leading to a resonance.103 Resonances can: - Clear Gaps: Perturb particles out of resonant orbits, creating gaps like the prominent Cassini Division between Saturn's A and B rings (associated with a 2:1 resonance with the moon Mimas).102 - Confine Edges: Define the sharp edges of rings. - Excite Waves: Launch spiral density waves and bending waves that propagate through the rings, visible as corrugated patterns.102 - Shepherd Moons: Small moons orbiting just inside or outside a narrow ring can gravitationally confine the ring particles between them.103 Through angular momentum exchange, the inner shepherd pushes particles outward, and the outer shepherd pushes them inward, keeping the ring narrow and sharp-edged. Saturn's F ring, shepherded by Prometheus and Pandora, is a classic example, although its complex, time-varying structure suggests additional dynamics are at play, possibly involving the chaotic orbits of the shepherds themselves.111 - Self-Gravity: In denser regions like Saturn's B ring, the mutual gravity between ring particles becomes important, leading to the formation of transient clumps and elongated structures called "self-gravity wakes".106 Missions like Voyager and particularly Cassini have revolutionized our understanding of ring dynamics, revealing exquisite detail and complex phenomena like "propellers" created by embedded moonlets and spokes potentially related to electromagnetic effects.102 The study of planetary rings provides a nearby laboratory for understanding disk dynamics relevant to planet formation and galactic structures. Gravity plays a dual role here: it holds the system together and drives resonant structuring, but also disrupts bodies via tides and clears gaps via resonant perturbations.102 The specific outcome depends sensitively on the configuration and masses involved. ## VIII. Modeling the Patterns: Mathematical and Theoretical Tools Understanding and predicting the complex behavior of pattern-forming systems necessitates the use of sophisticated mathematical and theoretical frameworks. Different tools are suited to different types of systems and scales, each offering unique strengths while also possessing inherent limitations. Key approaches include partial differential equations (PDEs) for continuous systems, discrete models like cellular automata, and topological descriptions using network theory. Reaction-Diffusion Equations (PDEs) Systems involving chemical reactions and spatial transport are often modeled using reaction-diffusion PDEs.13 These equations typically take the form: ∂t∂u​=D∇2u+F(u) where u(x,t) is a vector of concentrations of the reacting species, D is a matrix of diffusion coefficients (often diagonal), ∇2 is the Laplacian operator representing diffusion, and F(u) represents the nonlinear reaction kinetics.13 - Strengths: This framework provides a continuous description directly linked to physical processes of reaction and diffusion. It successfully explains the spontaneous emergence of Turing patterns through linear stability analysis and captures a wide range of phenomena in chemistry and developmental biology.13 The models can be adapted to complex geometries and boundary conditions, and incorporate spatial heterogeneity in parameters or reaction terms.25 Fractional reaction-diffusion equations can extend the framework to anomalous diffusion processes.24 - Limitations: Analytical solutions are rare except in simplified cases or near instability onset. For complex, strongly nonlinear systems, analysis becomes challenging.13 Numerical solutions are often required but can be computationally expensive due to stability constraints (especially with stiff reactions or diffusion).13 Numerical methods for finding stationary patterns (like Newton's method) can be sensitive to the initial guess and may preferentially converge to trivial homogeneous states.13 Predicting the specific pattern selected far from the initial bifurcation point remains a significant challenge.18 Standard Fickian diffusion may not adequately capture transport in all biological contexts.24 Cellular Automata (CA) Cellular automata offer a fundamentally different, discrete approach to modeling complex systems.7 A CA consists of a regular grid of cells, each existing in one of a finite set of states. The state of each cell evolves in discrete time steps according to a deterministic local rule that depends on its own state and the states of its neighboring cells.115 - Strengths: CAs are conceptually simple and computationally efficient, especially on parallel architectures, due to their local update rules.7 Despite their simplicity, they can generate extraordinarily complex emergent behavior and intricate patterns (e.g., Wolfram's elementary CA, Conway's Game of Life).7 They are well-suited for modeling systems with inherently discrete components or states and have found applications in simulating fluid dynamics (lattice gas automata), reaction-diffusion systems, solidification, traffic flow, ecological patterns, and social dynamics.7 They provide an intuitive paradigm for studying how local interactions lead to global self-organization.7 - Limitations: Designing CA rules to accurately reproduce specific, quantitative details of real-world physical or biological systems can be difficult and often requires heuristic approaches or evolutionary algorithms.7 The discrete nature of space, time, and states can be an oversimplification for systems best described by continuous variables, and the grid structure can sometimes introduce artificial anisotropies.119 Rigorous mathematical analysis of CA behavior can be challenging. Establishing a direct, formal link between CA rules and underlying continuous physical laws (like PDEs) is often non-trivial. Network Theory Network theory provides tools to analyze systems based on their relational structure, representing components as nodes (vertices) and interactions or relationships as links (edges).57 This approach focuses on the topology of connections rather than continuous spatial embedding or specific dynamic rules like PDEs or CAs. - Strengths: Network theory is exceptionally powerful for characterizing the structure of complex systems where interactions are key. It allows quantification of topological properties like degree distributions (identifying hubs), clustering coefficients (measuring local interconnectedness), path lengths (measuring separation), community structure (identifying modules), and centrality measures (identifying important nodes).2 It has revealed common structural motifs across diverse real-world networks (e.g., small-world property, scale-free degree distributions).2 Applications are vast, spanning social networks, biological networks (protein interactions, food webs, neural networks), technological networks (Internet, power grids), transportation systems, and more.8 It is also used to model dynamical processes on networks, such as epidemic spreading, information diffusion, and synchronization.120 - Limitations: Standard network analysis often focuses on static topology, potentially neglecting the dynamics of link formation/removal or changes in node states (though temporal network analysis is a growing field 120). The abstraction into nodes and edges can discard important spatial information or the specific nature of interactions. Inferring the true network structure accurately from empirical data can be challenging.122 It primarily describes how components are connected, rather than the detailed physical or biological mechanisms driving the system's dynamics. Fluid Dynamics (PDEs) For patterns arising in fluid motion, such as convection rolls, turbulence, or jets, the fundamental description lies in the equations of fluid dynamics, principally the Navier-Stokes equations (for incompressible Newtonian fluids) or their relativistic counterparts (for astrophysical jets near compact objects).98 These are PDEs expressing conservation of mass, momentum, and energy. - Strengths: These equations provide a first-principles description based on fundamental conservation laws, applicable to a vast range of fluid phenomena.124 They are essential for modeling convection, turbulence, wave propagation, and instabilities in fluids.125 Significant theoretical understanding and sophisticated numerical techniques (e.g., Finite Difference, Finite Volume, Spectral Methods, Lattice Boltzmann 119) have been developed. - Limitations: The Navier-Stokes equations are notoriously difficult to solve, especially in the turbulent regime, due to their strong nonlinearity.125 Analytical solutions are limited to very simple flows. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) resolving all scales of turbulence is computationally prohibitive for most realistic high-Reynolds-number flows.130 Modeling approaches like Large Eddy Simulation (LES) or Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) introduce approximations. Turbulence itself remains one of the major unsolved problems in classical physics, limiting our ability to predictively model many fluid patterns from first principles. Reduced Descriptions: Amplitude and Phase Equations Near the threshold of an instability leading to pattern formation, the complex dynamics governed by the full PDEs can often be simplified. Amplitude equations (like the Ginzburg-Landau equation) describe the slow evolution of the amplitude of the unstable pattern mode(s).16 Phase equations describe the slow spatial and temporal variations in the phase of an established periodic pattern, capturing phenomena like defect dynamics.16 - Strengths: These equations capture the universal behavior near the instability threshold, independent of many microscopic details of the specific system.16 They are mathematically simpler than the original PDEs, allowing for analytical insights into pattern selection, stability, and defect dynamics. - Limitations: Their validity is restricted to regimes close to the instability onset (weakly nonlinear regime).16 They may not accurately describe the dynamics far from threshold or highly complex/turbulent patterns. Model Complementarity and Universality No single modeling framework is universally optimal. PDEs offer physical realism for continuous systems but are often complex and computationally demanding. CAs provide a powerful tool for exploring emergence from simple rules but may lack direct physical interpretation. Network theory excels at analyzing connectivity and topology but abstracts away spatial and dynamical details. Fluid dynamics equations are fundamental for flows but face challenges with turbulence. The choice of model depends crucially on the specific system, the scale of interest, and the scientific question being addressed. Often, different models provide complementary perspectives.13 Furthermore, the fact that simplified models (like CAs or amplitude equations) can capture universal features seen in more complex systems underscores that macroscopic pattern formation is often governed by core mechanisms and symmetries rather than intricate microscopic details.7 Table 1: Comparison of Mathematical Frameworks for Pattern Formation Modeling | | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---|---| |Framework|Core Concept|Typical Applications|Strengths|Limitations|Key Snippets| |Reaction-Diffusion PDEs|Continuous fields evolving via local reactions & diffusion|Chemical oscillations/waves (BZ, CDIMA), biological morphogenesis (Turing patterns), cell polarity, epidemic spread|Captures interplay of reaction/transport, explains Turing patterns, widely applicable, adaptable to complex kinetics/geometry, extensions exist (fractional)|Analytically intractable (often), computationally expensive, sensitive numerics, predicting pattern selection difficult, standard diffusion limitations|13| |Cellular Automata (CA)|Discrete grid, states, time steps; local rules generate global dynamics|Fluid dynamics (lattice gas), reaction-diffusion, solidification, traffic flow, ecosystems, social dynamics, computation|Conceptually simple, computationally efficient (parallel), complex emergent behavior from simple rules, good for discrete systems, intuitive self-organization model|Rule design can be hard, link to continuous physics indirect, grid artifacts possible, analysis difficult|7| |Network Theory|Nodes & edges represent components & interactions; focus on topology|Social networks, biological networks (genes, proteins, food webs), technological networks (Internet, power grids), transport|Analyzes structure/connectivity, reveals hubs/communities/motifs, identifies universal network types (small-world, scale-free), models spreading processes, versatile|Often static (temporal nets exist), abstracts spatial/physical detail, structure inference challenging, describes connections more than driving mechanisms|2| |Fluid Dynamics PDEs|Continuous description based on conservation laws (mass, momentum, energy)|Convection, turbulence, wave propagation, weather/climate modeling, aerodynamics, astrophysics (jets, accretion)|Fundamental physics basis, essential for fluid patterns, well-established theory/numerics|Highly nonlinear, hard to solve analytically, turbulence modeling very challenging, computationally demanding (especially DNS)|98| |Amplitude/Phase Equations|Reduced PDEs describing slow evolution of pattern amplitude/phase near onset|Pattern selection, stability analysis, defect dynamics near bifurcation points|Captures universal behavior near onset, mathematically simpler than full PDEs, allows analytical insights|Validity restricted to near-onset regime, cannot describe far-from-equilibrium dynamics or strong turbulence|16| ## IX. Quantifying Order: Information Theory and Complexity Observing patterns is one thing; quantifying their structure, complexity, and the processes that generate them is another. Information theory and related concepts of complexity provide mathematical tools to objectively measure order, disorder, predictability, and structure in physical systems.14 Information Theory Fundamentals Developed by Claude Shannon, information theory provides a mathematical framework for quantifying information, uncertainty, and communication.14 Key concepts include: - Shannon Entropy (H): This measures the average uncertainty or "surprise" associated with the outcome of a random variable or process.14 For a discrete random variable X with possible outcomes xi​ having probabilities P(xi​), the entropy is given by: H(X)=−i∑​P(xi​)logb​P(xi​) The base b of the logarithm determines the units (e.g., b=2 for bits, b=e for nats).14 Maximum entropy corresponds to maximum uncertainty (e.g., a uniform probability distribution), while zero entropy corresponds to complete certainty (one outcome has probability 1).14 In physics, entropy is closely related to thermodynamic entropy and measures disorder or the number of accessible microstates corresponding to a macrostate.9 Related measures include joint entropy (uncertainty of multiple variables), conditional entropy (uncertainty of one variable given another), and entropy rate (entropy per symbol for a stochastic process).14 - Mutual Information (I(X;Y)): This quantifies the amount of information that one random variable X contains about another random variable Y. It measures the reduction in uncertainty about X that results from knowing Y, or vice versa. It is defined as: I(X;Y)=H(X)−H(X∣Y)=H(Y)−H(Y∣X)=H(X)+H(Y)−H(X,Y) Mutual information is zero if and only if X and Y are independent.14 Extensions like conditional mutual information and multivariate generalizations (total correlation, co-information) exist.132 Persistent Mutual Information (PMI) specifically measures the information shared between a system's past and its distant future, aiming to capture long-term predictability and emergence, robust to short-term noise or chaos.134 - Relative Entropy (Kullback-Leibler Divergence, DKL​(P∣∣Q)): This measures the "distance" or inefficiency of assuming a distribution Q when the true distribution is P. It quantifies the information gain when revising beliefs from Q to P.14 Applications to Pattern Quantification Information-theoretic measures can be applied to characterize the structure and formation of patterns: - Entropy Production: The rate at which entropy changes during pattern growth can provide insights into the underlying dynamics. For example, studies of model fractal growth found that the rate of entropy production (measured by the information required to specify the location of newly added particles) was maximized at a critical point corresponding to the formation of random fractals.135 - Complexity vs. Entropy: While entropy measures disorder, complexity is often associated with intricate, non-random structure. The relationship is not simple; complexity is not merely the opposite of entropy.9 Studies using complexity measures designed for natural patterns (e.g., based on scaling of heterogeneities) suggest that in some dynamic processes like mixing, complexity can increase alongside entropy, challenging the intuitive notion that complexity must decrease after an initial rise.9 The perceived relationship strongly depends on how the system is characterized (e.g., resolution, dimension) and the specific measures used.9 Various entropy-based measures have been developed to capture different facets of complexity, including temporal correlations (e.g., Approximate Entropy, Sample Entropy, Permutation Entropy), fuzziness, fractional dynamics, and network structure (Graph Entropy).133 - Emergence and Self-Organization: Information theory offers tools to quantify emergence and self-organization. Some definitions relate self-organization to a decrease in Shannon entropy (increase in order) over time due to internal dynamics.60 Emergence can be linked to measures like Effective Information (EI), defined as the mutual information between interventions on a system's state and the resulting state, quantifying causal influence.136 Causal emergence occurs when a coarse-grained, macroscopic description of a system exhibits higher EI than its underlying microscopic description, indicating that the macro-level possesses unique causal power.136 PMI is another approach proposed to quantify emergence by measuring persistent predictability.134 Algorithmic Complexity (Kolmogorov Complexity) A different approach to quantifying structure comes from algorithmic information theory.139 Kolmogorov complexity, K(x), of an object x (represented as a string) is defined as the length of the shortest computer program (on a fixed universal Turing machine) that can produce x as output.139 - Interpretation: It measures the minimum description length or the inherent algorithmic information content of the object.139 Simple, regular patterns (like '010101...') have low Kolmogorov complexity because they can be generated by short programs (e.g., "print '01' n times").141 Conversely, truly random strings are incompressible and have high Kolmogorov complexity, approximately equal to their length, as the shortest program is essentially just "print [the string itself]".141 - Properties: Kolmogorov complexity is theoretically fundamental but is uncomputable in general – there is no algorithm that can find K(x) for all x.139 It depends on the choice of description language (programming language), but only up to an additive constant (Invariance Theorem).139 - Applications: It provides a formal definition of randomness. It can be used to distinguish meaningful structure from random noise; the Kolmogorov structure function attempts to separate the information content into a structural part (related to the simplest model fitting the data) and a noise part.140 This formalizes Occam's razor.140 It has been applied to analyze the complexity of configurations sampled from statistical mechanics models, revealing connections between complexity and topology (e.g., in the XY model).143 Complexity Measures: A Broader View Quantifying "complexity" itself is challenging, with no single universally accepted definition.2 Shannon entropy measures uncertainty, and Kolmogorov complexity measures descriptive simplicity (algorithmic randomness). Neither perfectly captures the intuitive notion of complexity often associated with biological organisms or intricate patterns, which seem to possess significant structure that is neither perfectly regular nor purely random.2 This intermediate regime is where many interesting patterns reside. Researchers have proposed various measures attempting to capture this "effective" or "structural" complexity, often involving a balance between regularity and randomness, or quantifying the resources (time, memory) needed to generate or describe the structure.140 Measures like Effective Information 136 and Persistent Mutual Information 134 focus on causal efficacy or long-term predictability as signatures of meaningful emergent complexity. The choice of complexity measure depends heavily on the specific aspect of the system one wishes to capture. Information-theoretic concepts, despite the nuances in defining complexity, provide an invaluable, abstract language for describing dependencies, correlations, structure, and dynamics in complex systems across physics, biology, computation, and beyond.132 They offer a unifying framework for analyzing how information is stored, processed, and transformed during pattern formation and self-organization. ## X. Is the Universe Fine-Tuned? Non-Randomness and Anthropic Considerations The observation of specific, intricate patterns and structures, particularly those essential for complexity and life, raises profound questions about whether the universe's properties are merely random outcomes or if they exhibit a degree of non-randomness or "fine-tuning." This leads into discussions involving dynamical mechanisms, fundamental constants, and philosophical considerations like the anthropic principle. Evidence for Non-Randomness in Astrophysical Systems Certain observed patterns in astrophysical systems appear statistically unlikely to arise purely by chance, suggesting underlying organizing principles or dynamical constraints. A prominent example is orbital resonance in planetary systems.108 Resonances occur when the orbital periods of two or more bodies are related by a ratio of small integers (e.g., 2:1, 3:2, 5:3). Such configurations lead to periodic gravitational interactions that can significantly influence the system's long-term dynamics and stability.108 Observations reveal that mean-motion resonances are common in our Solar System (e.g., Jupiter's moons Io, Europa, Ganymede in a 1:2:4 Laplace resonance 110; gaps in the asteroid belt corresponding to resonances with Jupiter, known as Kirkwood gaps 108) and in numerous exoplanetary systems (e.g., the remarkable resonant chain in TRAPPIST-1 110). Studies suggest that the observed period ratios often cluster around simple fractions, sometimes involving Fibonacci numbers, more frequently than expected randomly.108 This non-randomness is generally attributed to dynamical processes during planet formation and migration, where planets interact gravitationally and can become trapped in stable resonant configurations through processes like disk migration or tidal interactions.108 Resonances can thus act as a self-organizing mechanism, leading to stable, structured architectures rather than random arrangements.108 While seemingly non-random, these patterns are potentially explainable within the framework of known gravitational dynamics and formation scenarios, rather than requiring fundamentally new physics or fine-tuning of constants. The Fine-Tuning Problem of Fundamental Constants A deeper level of apparent non-randomness concerns the values of the fundamental constants of nature and the initial conditions of the universe.15 Numerous studies have highlighted that if the values of constants like the gravitational constant, the electromagnetic fine-structure constant, the masses of elementary particles (electron, proton, neutron), or the strengths of the nuclear forces were even slightly different, the universe would be drastically different and likely incapable of supporting complex structures, chemistry, stars, or life as we know it.15 Similarly, cosmological parameters like the initial expansion rate, the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations, and the value of the cosmological constant appear finely tuned.15 For example: - If gravity were much stronger, stars would burn out too quickly. If much weaker, stars might not ignite. - If the strong force were slightly weaker, complex nuclei wouldn't be stable. If slightly stronger, all hydrogen might have fused in the Big Bang. - If the initial density fluctuations were much larger, the universe might have collapsed into black holes; if much smaller, galaxies wouldn't have formed.147 - The observed value of the cosmological constant (dark energy) is incredibly small compared to theoretical expectations from quantum field theory, yet large enough to cause accelerated expansion. A much larger value would have prevented structure formation entirely.15 This apparent "fine-tuning" for life and complexity is statistically puzzling if the constants could have taken any arbitrary values. The Naturalness Problem in Particle Physics Related to fine-tuning is the naturalness problem (or hierarchy problem) in particle physics, primarily concerning the mass of the Higgs boson and the value of the cosmological constant.15 According to quantum field theory, the observed ("renormalized") values of parameters like the Higgs mass receive quantum corrections that depend on the physics at very high energy scales (up to a cutoff scale, potentially the Planck scale).148 For the Higgs mass, these corrections are expected to be enormous, proportional to the square of the cutoff scale. To arrive at the relatively small observed Higgs mass (125 GeV), the "bare" mass parameter in the fundamental theory must be exquisitely fine-tuned to cancel these huge quantum corrections to dozens of decimal places.148 A similar, even more severe, fine-tuning is required for the cosmological constant.15 This extreme sensitivity of low-energy observables (Higgs mass, cosmological constant) to high-energy physics violates the principle of "technical naturalness," which suggests that parameters should not require such delicate cancellations.148 It implies an unexplained correlation between vastly different energy scales, contradicting the expectation of "autonomy of scales" where low-energy physics should be largely insensitive to the details of very high-energy physics.148 The failure of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to find new physics (like supersymmetry) that could naturally explain the Higgs mass has intensified this problem, leading some to question the validity of naturalness as a guiding principle.148 Anthropic Principles as a Potential Explanation One controversial approach to addressing fine-tuning relies on anthropic reasoning, or observation selection effects.144 The core idea is that our very existence as observers biases the type of universe we can possibly observe. - Weak Anthropic Principle (WAP): This states that the observed properties of the universe must be compatible with the existence of observers.15 It is essentially a tautology or consistency check: we find ourselves in a universe old enough and with the right constants for life because if it weren't, we wouldn't be here to observe it. It highlights selection bias but doesn't provide a causal explanation for the constants' values. - Strong Anthropic Principle (SAP): This proposes, more controversially, that the universe must possess properties that allow life/observers to develop within it at some stage.15 This can be interpreted in various ways, from suggesting a purpose or design behind the universe to implying that observers are somehow necessary for the universe's existence (Wheeler's Participatory Anthropic Principle).144 Critics argue that anthropic principles, especially the SAP, are unfalsifiable, potentially teleological, and may discourage the search for more fundamental physical explanations.144 The Multiverse Hypothesis Anthropic reasoning gains more physical grounding when combined with the multiverse hypothesis.15 If our universe is just one of many universes within a larger multiverse, and if the fundamental constants or laws vary across these universes (as suggested by theories like eternal inflation 82 or the string theory landscape 151), then the fine-tuning problem might be resolved via a selection effect. We simply find ourselves in one of the rare universes where the parameters happen to fall within the narrow range compatible with the formation of complex structures and observers.15 In this view, the constants are not fundamentally fine-tuned; rather, we live in a region of the multiverse where they happen to have life-permitting values. Whether explained by anthropic selection within a multiverse or by yet-unknown physical principles that resolve the naturalness problems, the apparent fine-tuning of fundamental constants strongly suggests that our current Standard Models of particle physics and cosmology are incomplete. They either represent only a small, observable part of a much larger reality (the multiverse) or lack deeper principles that determine the observed parameter values without requiring delicate cancellations. The distinction between dynamically generated non-randomness (like orbital resonances) and fundamental fine-tuning is crucial: the former may be explained by known physics, while the latter points towards profound gaps in our understanding of the fundamental laws of nature. ## XI. Peering into the Future: Next-Generation Probes Advancing our understanding of pattern and structure formation necessitates pushing the frontiers of observation and experimentation across all relevant scales. A new generation of powerful facilities and innovative techniques promises to provide crucial data to test theoretical models, constrain parameters, and potentially uncover new physics governing the emergence of order in the universe. Cosmology and Large-Scale Structure The study of the universe's largest structures and its evolution is poised for significant advances: - Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Experiments: Next-generation ground-based observatories like CMB-S4, the Simons Observatory, and the future space mission LiteBIRD aim to map the CMB polarization, particularly the faint B-mode patterns, with unprecedented sensitivity.153 Detecting primordial B-modes would provide strong evidence for cosmic inflation and probe the energy scale at which it occurred.153 CMB lensing maps will provide precise measurements of the distribution of matter over cosmic time, constraining neutrino masses and testing dark energy models.153 - Large-Scale Structure Surveys (Optical/NIR): Upcoming wide-field imaging and spectroscopic surveys like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory (LSST), the Euclid space telescope, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and the Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST) will map the positions and properties of billions of galaxies over vast volumes of the universe.154 Techniques like weak gravitational lensing (measuring the distortion of background galaxy shapes by foreground matter) and galaxy clustering (including BAO measurements) will provide stringent tests of the ΛCDM model, constrain the equation of state of dark energy, measure the growth rate of structure to test general relativity on cosmic scales, and probe the nature of dark matter.154 Future spectroscopic surveys like DESI follow-ons (e.g., Spec-S5, MUST) will provide even more precise redshift information.154 - Radio Surveys: The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and its precursors will revolutionize radio astronomy, enabling vast surveys of neutral hydrogen (HI) through its 21cm emission line.154 These surveys will map the LSS in a way complementary to optical surveys, probe the Epoch of Reionization (when the first stars and galaxies ionized the neutral intergalactic medium), and potentially test fundamental physics through intensity mapping and cosmic magnetism studies.154 - James Webb Space Telescope (JWST): While not a survey instrument in the same vein, JWST's sensitivity allows it to probe the very early universe, observing the formation of the first stars and galaxies and shedding light on the initial stages of structure formation and reionization.157 - Gravitational Waves (GWs): Detectors like LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and future instruments (LISA, Einstein Telescope, Cosmic Explorer) open a new window onto the universe.154 Observations of merging black holes and neutron stars provide tests of general relativity in the strong-field regime and insights into compact object astrophysics. "Standard sirens" – GW events with electromagnetic counterparts – offer independent measurements of the Hubble constant and cosmic expansion.154 Detecting a stochastic background of primordial gravitational waves would be another key signature of inflation.158 Particle Physics Experiments Experiments probing the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions are crucial for understanding the building blocks of structures and potentially uncovering physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM): - High-Energy Colliders: Upgrades to the Large Hadron Collider (High-Luminosity LHC) and proposals for future colliders (e.g., FCC, ILC, muon colliders) aim to increase energy and luminosity.156 These facilities will continue the search for new particles predicted by theories like supersymmetry or extra dimensions, which could potentially solve the hierarchy problem or provide dark matter candidates.156 Precision measurements of Higgs boson properties and other SM processes will probe for subtle deviations indicative of BSM physics.156 - Dark Matter Searches: A diverse program of experiments seeks to detect dark matter particles directly (via scattering off target nuclei in underground detectors), indirectly (by searching for annihilation or decay products like gamma rays or neutrinos from space), or produce them at colliders.156 - Neutrino Physics: Ongoing and future experiments aim to precisely measure neutrino oscillation parameters, determine the neutrino mass hierarchy and absolute mass scale, and search for CP violation in the lepton sector and sterile neutrinos. These measurements have implications for cosmology and BSM physics.160 Condensed Matter and Laboratory Systems Controlled laboratory experiments provide invaluable testbeds for theories of pattern formation: - Fluid Dynamics: Experiments on Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Taylor-Couette flow, and other fluid systems allow detailed study of instabilities, pattern selection, turbulence, and the transition to chaos under controlled conditions, testing theoretical predictions and numerical simulations.125 - Chemical Systems: Experiments with oscillating reactions (like BZ) or reaction-diffusion systems in gels or microfluidic devices allow direct visualization and manipulation of chemical patterns, providing tests for Turing mechanisms and nonlinear dynamics.13 - Biological Systems: Advances in microscopy, optogenetics, and synthetic biology enable quantitative studies of pattern formation at the cellular and tissue level, probing mechanisms like protein patterning, cell signaling, and morphogenesis.3 - Materials Science: Studies of solidification fronts, thin film growth, polymer dynamics, and self-assembly provide arenas for testing theories of pattern formation driven by phase transitions and energy minimization. - Plasma Physics: Laboratory experiments creating magnetohydrodynamically driven plasma jets can simulate conditions relevant to astrophysical jets, testing MHD launching mechanisms.101 Synergy and the Theory-Observation Loop Future progress hinges critically on the synergy between these diverse observational and experimental efforts.154 Combining data from different cosmological probes (CMB, LSS, GWs) is essential to break parameter degeneracies, control systematic errors, and build a robust cosmological model.154 For instance, combining CMB lensing data with galaxy survey data provides powerful constraints on structure growth and neutrino mass.155 Discoveries in particle physics (e.g., the nature of dark matter) would have profound implications for cosmological models, while cosmological observations constrain particle physics theories (e.g., inflation, neutrino properties).156 Furthermore, progress relies on a strong feedback loop between theory and observation/experiment.158 Theoretical developments, including analytical models and increasingly sophisticated numerical simulations (e.g., GRMHD for jets 96, N-body for LSS 90), are needed to interpret the complex datasets from next-generation facilities and make testable predictions. Conversely, new observations and experimental results challenge existing theories, refine models, and guide the development of new theoretical frameworks.81 This iterative process is fundamental to advancing our understanding of how patterns and structures emerge and evolve across all scales. ## XII. Synthesis and Outlook The universe exhibits a remarkable propensity for self-organization, generating intricate patterns and complex structures across scales ranging from the subatomic to the cosmic. This report has surveyed the fundamental principles, mechanisms, and theoretical frameworks employed to understand this ubiquitous phenomenon. Several core mechanisms underpin pattern formation. Instabilities in systems driven far from equilibrium act as primary triggers, amplifying small fluctuations into macroscopic structures. Reaction-diffusion processes, particularly the Turing mechanism involving differential diffusion rates, provide a key explanation for spatial patterns in chemical and biological systems. Spontaneous symmetry breaking, where systems transition from symmetric to less symmetric states, is a fundamental concept applicable from particle physics to macroscopic phenomena like buckling and phase transitions. The tendency of physical systems to minimize energy also drives the formation of ordered structures, from molecular configurations to material microstructures. These mechanisms are often intertwined, with their relative importance depending critically on the physical scale under consideration. The evolution of patterns is governed by a complex interplay between initial conditions and ongoing dynamics. While nonlinear systems can exhibit chaotic sensitivity to initial conditions, limiting long-term predictability of specific trajectories, the system's dynamics often guide it towards a limited set of stable or quasi-stable patterned states (attractors). Feedback loops play a crucial role, not only in driving instabilities (positive feedback) but also in stabilizing patterns and selecting specific configurations (negative and delayed feedback). The four fundamental forces dictate the nature of structures at different scales: nuclear forces bind atomic nuclei, electromagnetism governs atoms and molecules, and gravity orchestrates the formation of planets, stars, galaxies, and the cosmic web. The existence of stable structures at any scale represents a balance or competition between these forces. The formation of the universe's large-scale structure, described by the ΛCDM model, is a prime example, originating from quantum fluctuations amplified during cosmic inflation and subsequently shaped by gravitational instability dominated by dark matter, under the influence of dark energy-driven cosmic acceleration. Astrophysical systems showcase further examples of self-organization, including the density waves and star formation processes shaping galactic spiral arms, the MHD-driven launching of stellar jets from accretion disks, and the intricate dynamics of planetary rings sculpted by resonances and shepherd moons. Modeling these diverse phenomena requires a range of mathematical tools. Reaction-diffusion PDEs provide a physical basis for chemical and biological patterns but can be complex to solve. Cellular automata offer a simple framework for exploring emergence from local rules but may lack direct physical grounding. Network theory excels at analyzing connectivity but abstracts away spatial detail. Fluid dynamics equations are fundamental for flows but computationally challenging, especially for turbulence. The choice of model is dictated by the system and the question, with simplified models often capturing universal behaviors governed by core mechanisms rather than microscopic details. Quantifying the emergent order utilizes concepts from information theory and complexity science. Shannon entropy measures uncertainty or disorder, while algorithmic (Kolmogorov) complexity measures descriptive simplicity. Neither fully captures the intuitive notion of complexity often associated with intricate natural patterns, motivating the development of measures focusing on structural information, causal efficacy, or long-term predictability. Information theory provides a powerful, unifying language for analyzing structure and dynamics across disciplines. The apparent non-randomness in some astrophysical systems (e.g., orbital resonances) may be explained by dynamical self-organization. However, the fine-tuning of fundamental constants required for a life-permitting universe poses a deeper challenge, potentially pointing towards new physics beyond the Standard Model, anthropic selection within a multiverse, or limitations in our current understanding of naturalness. Future progress in understanding pattern formation relies heavily on next-generation observational facilities (CMB-S4, LSST, Euclid, SKA, JWST, GW detectors) and particle physics experiments (LHC upgrades, future colliders, dark matter/neutrino experiments), combined with controlled laboratory studies. The synergy between these diverse probes and the continuous feedback loop between theory, simulation, and experiment/observation will be crucial. Despite significant advances, major questions remain. What determines the specific pattern selected in many systems? Can we develop a more comprehensive theory of complexity? What is the fundamental nature of dark matter and dark energy, which dominate cosmic structure? Is the universe truly fine-tuned, and if so, why? The persistent scientific drive is towards unification – seeking common principles like symmetry breaking, criticality, or perhaps even a more fundamental theory that can explain the emergence of order across all scales in a more integrated way. While a complete unified picture remains elusive, the ongoing exploration of pattern and structure formation continues to reveal the deep connections and underlying elegance of the physical laws governing our universe. #### Works cited 1. Complex Systems Research in Psychology - 1 Introduction, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://santafeinstitute.github.io/ComplexPsych/ch1.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://santafeinstitute.github.io/ComplexPsych/ch1.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482230878%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0apF-5AbelZBcFe6jYl1CN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378184&usg=AOvVaw0rt0fjhczrqOQkEN-ZtPud) 2. Complexity and Self-organization, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/ELIS-complexity.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/ELIS-complexity.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482231291%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1rR-TvqOPXQ8UnJr-UEmfO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378494&usg=AOvVaw3EAGIYnNXfefR8G9jXVfXL) 3. A Modern View on Turing's Theory of Pattern Formation | Royal ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsociety.org/blog/2021/11/turing-theory-pattern-formation/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsociety.org/blog/2021/11/turing-theory-pattern-formation/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482231703%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw31tFvs4S_28bNB4GB7t0vl&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378554&usg=AOvVaw0GML0nnIXjOEBxsxqjLXG9) 4. Spiral arm - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_arm](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_arm%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482231984%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1nuH9Z0222Is4X6My9s_6E&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378612&usg=AOvVaw3p7ewuYnSVm9tEXK07Ur00) 5. Dark matter - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482232294%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw21rfYW-jMuvm6PfNgE9Yi0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378662&usg=AOvVaw0VZyEYM2MMDp9IteEOEYZW) 6. Self-Organizing Systems: A Tutorial in Complexity - Solar Influences Data Analysis Center, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.sidc.be/users/evarob/Literature/Papers/Various/self%20organizing%20systems.htm](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.sidc.be/users/evarob/Literature/Papers/Various/self%252520organizing%252520systems.htm%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482232766%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2vRIEaeu2GqPBK4IMZWOQk&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378720&usg=AOvVaw1BWL5JyKI2Glm7_74LmwhP) 7. Cellular Automaton Modeling of Pattern Formation | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254901784_Cellular_Automaton_Modeling_of_Pattern_Formation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/254901784_Cellular_Automaton_Modeling_of_Pattern_Formation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482233252%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0HK6mSHS3jNfD30pWuC0AF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378781&usg=AOvVaw1xI-j6QJKdMDa4oq1RUkUu) 8. Complex system - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_system](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_system%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482233573%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw04Aao8Ny-_0OzGIiLMCKa_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378840&usg=AOvVaw0geGPPOSTMiNY1T4boSCTR) 9. Complexity and entropy of natural patterns | PNAS Nexus - Oxford Academic, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/10/pgae417/7761138](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/10/pgae417/7761138%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482234022%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1hpB86tWoMML-CHhD67gZU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378893&usg=AOvVaw1nAsqxsQPJCXz-R4xFdhM8) 10. Unified field theory - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482234337%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0ypjSvaVXlBjiRSqtvRZjV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378944&usg=AOvVaw2OGAlLdeQCtudb9byFuY7e) 11. Forces - NASA Science, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://science.nasa.gov/universe/overview/forces/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://science.nasa.gov/universe/overview/forces/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482234645%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2ntZumlbuY2gV6pvUH1iYv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482378999&usg=AOvVaw36XiLBY-XpGoUjkfCD1rmy) 12. Chaos theory - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482234962%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1b5tm0YvOlfHlBpFpXRujS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379050&usg=AOvVaw0xp6NOvnt0Zdttmc-UNVBS) 13. A Robust and Efficient Method for Steady State Patterns in Reaction ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3389814/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3389814/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482235427%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2CS2WoTCQL-nTpz4oz9Fdv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379101&usg=AOvVaw09nBdNapyW3RZhptRtvdHd) 14. Information theory - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482235774%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3CTSib_ILNhCwS26Euatfq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379152&usg=AOvVaw1LGyPlL5mIgjVIcTQa0cG-) 15. Fine-Tuning in the Physical Universe 9781108484541, 1108484549 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://dokumen.pub/fine-tuning-in-the-physical-universe-9781108484541-1108484549.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://dokumen.pub/fine-tuning-in-the-physical-universe-9781108484541-1108484549.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482236247%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1sX1UZpxj16UP2moeVhi3E&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379207&usg=AOvVaw3xg10JD3UFQP28eUhOpLrP) 16. www.princeton.edu, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.princeton.edu/~wbialek/rome/refs/cross+hohenberg_93.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.princeton.edu/~wbialek/rome/refs/cross%252Bhohenberg_93.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482236594%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1az3n7OIPjOC18-x8kiO29&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379261&usg=AOvVaw1xsAGyvD8G0U2fHKGyz4ex) 17. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium - Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gold/pdfs/teaching/cross_hohenberg.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gold/pdfs/teaching/cross_hohenberg.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482237068%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0UUYibnopzu-q3TAaS-mBM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379318&usg=AOvVaw0jYV39f2qSahThX6Rz9YU1) 18. Pattern selection in reaction diffusion systems - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012215](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012215%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482237450%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1fHuAD31T0r2QZ_8yeSUBe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379371&usg=AOvVaw0j3lpG4XxzWnLb7RpArEX4) 19. Delayed global feedback in the genesis and stability of ... - PLOS, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007931](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id%253D10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007931%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482237857%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0smWmS6E25s9bEAD-RqtqU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379424&usg=AOvVaw0YJkQdL4DnTd57VOwU5xgs) 20. Delayed global feedback in the genesis and stability of spatiotemporal excitation patterns in paced biological excitable media - PubMed Central, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561267/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561267/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482238346%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1RZxlaE3oFE17dmX0nZl8C&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379482&usg=AOvVaw36jw-oppqjBqy93wGsgHIb) 21. Feedback loops: Nonlinear Behavior: Understanding Nonlinear Behavior in Feedback Loops - FasterCapital, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.fastercapital.com/content/Feedback-loops--Nonlinear-Behavior--Understanding-Nonlinear-Behavior-in-Feedback-Loops.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.fastercapital.com/content/Feedback-loops--Nonlinear-Behavior--Understanding-Nonlinear-Behavior-in-Feedback-Loops.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482238919%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2IbnVDCoHkBG7kGH5PbtKt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379569&usg=AOvVaw13Eki69hwivFzCicHzMKpT) 22. Diffusion-driven instabilities in the BT-GN oscillatory carbonylation reaction network | Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science | AIP Publishing, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pubs.aip.org/aip/cha/article/34/7/073152/3304568/Diffusion-driven-instabilities-in-the-BT-GN](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/cha/article/34/7/073152/3304568/Diffusion-driven-instabilities-in-the-BT-GN%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482239553%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3XQrBCB6e23HYqLgWtDIez&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379643&usg=AOvVaw3svLBr0IdsCjkaRv63h4h0) 23. (PDF) Pattern formation mechanisms in reaction-diffusion systems - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26321935_Pattern_formation_mechanisms_in_reaction-diffusion_systems](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/26321935_Pattern_formation_mechanisms_in_reaction-diffusion_systems%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482240121%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0p51IL69rfwZG-VtPVdPRM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379702&usg=AOvVaw0Jdi0Z_wkFb29nQw5aW8sX) 24. Comprehensive Numerical Analysis of Time-Fractional Reaction–Diffusion Models with Applications to Chemical and Biological Phenomena - MDPI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3251](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3251%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482240651%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2zMbNUcyY3FfMrsCz9NLRa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379761&usg=AOvVaw0m5ipLH5mc19dN7KNDfxV_) 25. Pattern formation in a reaction-diffusion system with space-dependent feed rate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://personal.math.ubc.ca/~jcwei/density-final.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://personal.math.ubc.ca/~jcwei/density-final.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482241093%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0KyMP8P_WDBVqyCCAEfqGv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379818&usg=AOvVaw02YDaxY-CDE1rLzwqiK1mK) 26. Self-organization principles of intracellular pattern formation ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2017.0107](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2017.0107%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482241526%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Lt_Ag1q953wy_tuM31LA0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379871&usg=AOvVaw0tLZBUobDBmDZGTrDQif1i) 27. Control of protein-based pattern formation via guiding cues - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.10091](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.10091%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482241844%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw02yEt6NJtZgIWBjUnioVr6&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379931&usg=AOvVaw3AbTMc72MfrwMhHF9kXBsl) 28. Forceful patterning: theoretical principles of mechanochemical pattern formation - PMC, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792592/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792592/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482242448%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1MvpJAda_jiUtaRkmIH7kF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482379985&usg=AOvVaw3_IpUA8IungZ-0Wnbq92Io) 29. Symmetry breaking - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_breaking](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_breaking%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482242792%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw28Bp7qxSWC6eAMHQ8lGCjW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380037&usg=AOvVaw0GP9IMmrcwUTOFiU2gggpD) 30. Spontaneous symmetry breaking - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482243228%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2nuU-tYDNOS8iJGC0P4yYA&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380086&usg=AOvVaw1Xs3fUP0YmPfFarpGKLxVE) 31. guava.physics.ucsd.edu, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://guava.physics.ucsd.edu/~nigel/Courses/Web%20page%20569/Essays_Fall2008/files/VAFABAKHSH.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://guava.physics.ucsd.edu/~nigel/Courses/Web%252520page%252520569/Essays_Fall2008/files/VAFABAKHSH.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482243702%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1zRa7omRi9MRGCHE3BCXr4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380140&usg=AOvVaw0zOJpRvwhswSQDf697HAMP) 32. Symmetry Breaking as an Interdisciplinary Concept Unifying Cell and Developmental Biology, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7825676/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7825676/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482244085%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2_kaWFIW1ohpz1ae0HTeQH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380197&usg=AOvVaw2WerbXtgKBf-VBrD82YC4R) 33. Pattern-induced local symmetry breaking in active matter systems - Statistical and Biological Physics - LMU Munich, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/lsfrey/research/soft_matter/pattern_induced_sym_break_am/index.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/lsfrey/research/soft_matter/pattern_induced_sym_break_am/index.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482244688%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2rg1VepBQ3QDF5J1BWdKbI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380255&usg=AOvVaw1Zwi3X4Hez1ZBrK9j9-Wuf) 34. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16809#:~:text=Symmetry%20breaking%20triggers%20the%20emergence,oscillations%20of%20the%20field%20amplitude.](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16809%2523:~:text%253DSymmetry%252520breaking%252520triggers%252520the%252520emergence,oscillations%252520of%252520the%252520field%252520amplitude.%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482245204%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0bsPNe1mbS8iNFdA02mTLx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380314&usg=AOvVaw2uwQqk86NyErpO0s3dsZ21) 35. Symmetry Breaking and Spatiotemporal Pattern Formation in Photonic Time Crystals - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2404.16809v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2404.16809v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482245583%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw080zV49flK1XoMLoJDCU2M&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380373&usg=AOvVaw303BNcmInY_m8g2UckmoXD) 36. [2404.16809] Symmetry Breaking and Spatiotemporal Pattern Formation in Photonic Time Crystals - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16809](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16809%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482245966%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3B4Kn-XGSsWOY1X3uQK4-u&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380430&usg=AOvVaw3PSXxORmYp8egLlejOXMUK) 37. Energy minimization - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_minimization](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_minimization%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482246290%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0vmpM4dafvOpzcXcQV0g0U&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380478&usg=AOvVaw2LBWn6h6uly9KQmz2CMuYH) 38. Molecular Dynamics Simulation (MDSim) Module - UTEP, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.utep.edu/science/upbit/curriculum/mdsim.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.utep.edu/science/upbit/curriculum/mdsim.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482246640%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0O3B1K4w6Yrpd4jIcmISW4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380527&usg=AOvVaw0dLBNly1lv5KQauTSQkJ-2) 39. Energy minimization – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Engineering_support_and_special_topics/Energy_minimization/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Engineering_support_and_special_topics/Energy_minimization/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482247172%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1duXEGRx6OVYzvZX7dKQfx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380657&usg=AOvVaw2toQsjpcs7sSdhhoer1L-p) 40. ENERGY MINIMIZATION METHODS.pptx - SlideShare, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/energy-minimization-methodspptx/259877374](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/energy-minimization-methodspptx/259877374%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482247601%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1ede2x8Uve8iBUy0i6G83R&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380715&usg=AOvVaw2pWXa02siio-k8sBzqGZJF) 41. math.nyu.edu, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://math.nyu.edu/faculty/kohn/papers/courant-oct2017.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://math.nyu.edu/faculty/kohn/papers/courant-oct2017.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482247938%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0ZOTd6BKM_5YIoHNGowOze&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380768&usg=AOvVaw2ehY4Ks1PRUPEUlGNKC8dE) 42. Energy Minimization and Flux Domain Structure in the Intermediate State of a Type-I Superconductor, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.math.mcgill.ca/rchoksi/pub/thepaper.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.math.mcgill.ca/rchoksi/pub/thepaper.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482248465%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2lFtHoYJk5dUyFFOJeO8LF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380823&usg=AOvVaw2hUidnrkJAVRyi6tSDFwP_) 43. Energy minimization for self-organized structure formation and actuation - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224405286_Energy_minimization_for_self-organized_structure_formation_and_actuation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/224405286_Energy_minimization_for_self-organized_structure_formation_and_actuation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482249175%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0jOkw-1zl5dp-xCy5Zn5iX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380878&usg=AOvVaw2S9eiTmIjCsFX8sTo7YzvU) 44. A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness - PMC, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8205007/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8205007/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482249660%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Y9JDcRaBCL6bghZIA2qg1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380935&usg=AOvVaw0ZFnICSladvCcSBrU21gKh) 45. Full article: A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2021.1907910](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2021.1907910%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482250227%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1XOLXYpX_9YHAMGO-g8Heq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482380991&usg=AOvVaw3MHLgFo-OHucG86_7fCNgM) 46. (PDF) Complexity and Self-organization - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228893485_Complexity_and_Self-organization](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/228893485_Complexity_and_Self-organization%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482250774%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0qfKzNF_hxeOP74PYI5Oam&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381046&usg=AOvVaw2mn-8ExoMUw37h1Mb6uO9E) 47. On the evolution and saturation of instabilities of two-dimensional isolated circular vortices - SOEST Hawaii, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/faculty/kloosterziel/pdfs/low.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/faculty/kloosterziel/pdfs/low.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482251302%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw39Um4yP6yjnJPmdPIVYZwx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381107&usg=AOvVaw0qbFwfu7ZRbj_S5C4oHUO3) 48. Fundamental Forces - (Honors Physics) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://fiveable.me/key-terms/honors-physics/fundamental-forces](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://fiveable.me/key-terms/honors-physics/fundamental-forces%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482251792%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1Ym8x0LLtUc_cF7_aa_E3F&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381195&usg=AOvVaw3BEefpE55fVP9BUCge-1gP) 49. Fundamental forces and their carriers | Principles of Physics IV Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/principles-of-physics-iv/unit-15/fundamental-forces-carriers/study-guide/xrnCeEL3DFodZX54](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/principles-of-physics-iv/unit-15/fundamental-forces-carriers/study-guide/xrnCeEL3DFodZX54%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482252365%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw02VTXdcUIUPYGLwFmoYDyV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381260&usg=AOvVaw309tnMPYKvoA7ICQ3iJAHj) 50. 23.1 The Four Fundamental Forces - Physics | OpenStax, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/23-1-the-four-fundamental-forces](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/23-1-the-four-fundamental-forces%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482252831%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VhGLRgX406qbZh1mbP258&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381319&usg=AOvVaw1cQqJ4wWLx6j4ArtriP4Zs) 51. The Fundamental Forces of Nature for A Level Physics - Science Sanctuary, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://sciencesanctuary.com/fundamental-forces](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://sciencesanctuary.com/fundamental-forces%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482253189%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2PJ7beIGxBiehEfhfancWX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381376&usg=AOvVaw2Ecn5Bq5cyrbT15-JvCqqc) 52. 4.8 Extended Topic: The Four Basic Forces—An Introduction - Texas Gateway, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://texasgateway.org/resource/48-extended-topic-four-basic-forces-introduction](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://texasgateway.org/resource/48-extended-topic-four-basic-forces-introduction%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482253721%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2F6Q_mcziD-6Vi9uSnhEjf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381429&usg=AOvVaw1xic_rZMAWy-AHDh-5-ep8) 53. Four fundamental forces (video) - Khan Academy, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.khanacademy.org/science/cosmology-and-astronomy/universe-scale-topic/light-fundamental-forces/v/four-fundamental-forces](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.khanacademy.org/science/cosmology-and-astronomy/universe-scale-topic/light-fundamental-forces/v/four-fundamental-forces%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482254371%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2EkH3J22-pyktLrZ0hti7I&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381485&usg=AOvVaw2CpFRiOyOV2ym_OUnuqGuq) 54. Dark energy - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482254677%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2VyOQdTWyc-kywwindB4jk&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381539&usg=AOvVaw0ILkJtLPiAkWgKgXeb0J2z) 55. Fundamental Forces and Physical Scale | ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/post/Fundamental_Forces_and_Physical_Scale](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/post/Fundamental_Forces_and_Physical_Scale%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482255139%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3NwFxEs_maj-CiEwlE2Wbt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381595&usg=AOvVaw3vtJashgU2NUrR7HhowZjk) 56. What is complex systems science? - Santa Fe Institute, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.santafe.edu/what-is-complex-systems-science](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.santafe.edu/what-is-complex-systems-science%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482255630%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1B5OiBShmu8X-JfG4poHjE&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381651&usg=AOvVaw3NzuX8WaZfXYqHtT5wEbku) 57. Complex Systems: A Survey, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.math.wm.edu/~rrkinc/homework/ComplexSystemsSurvey11.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.math.wm.edu/~rrkinc/homework/ComplexSystemsSurvey11.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482255992%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1twi2h_zutOdA9Xl9uwZIz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381710&usg=AOvVaw3jZL4nDrHPGak6tQ93nWZm) 58. Complex systems biology | Journal of The Royal Society Interface, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2017.0391](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2017.0391%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482256399%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1f5YJg_BOsgdCz9U8AYevW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381769&usg=AOvVaw21eZKX-wvLBogKivgoTWJU) 59. Complex Systems Research in Psychology - 5 Self-organization, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://santafeinstitute.github.io/ComplexPsych/ch5n.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://santafeinstitute.github.io/ComplexPsych/ch5n.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482256812%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ARsartT12bt9cRhPpvWi4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381823&usg=AOvVaw1_3tZwXsEZEfX9JPcdfkL9) 60. Complexity and Information: Measuring Emergence, Self-organization, and Homeostasis at Multiple Scales arXiv:1205.2026v2 [cs.IT, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.2026](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.2026%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482257351%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0jS7Hw6Ylue0Tgqvwp7UOm&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381879&usg=AOvVaw2iaHKXlFjvNEf92wXhz_TW) 61. Self-Organised Criticality – What It Is and What It Isn't. - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11217/1/SOC.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11217/1/SOC.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482257843%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1vMxOpopm11L-J_cUtXV1l&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381931&usg=AOvVaw3DPdnzjHhBLNGvt_RjOGBl) 62. Self-organized criticality - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organized_criticality](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organized_criticality%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482258195%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0JPmMOy4g0j-iyFVyO4iNO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482381983&usg=AOvVaw0RAWPcjS56nTGFdjgwjtzJ) 63. Creating Turing patterns in the lab - Santa Fe Institute, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/sole-and-colleagues-create-turing-patterns-lab](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/sole-and-colleagues-create-turing-patterns-lab%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482258759%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Y_Aexp9irml6JSAIVpyV3&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382046&usg=AOvVaw3QpEdQYDhf2sCuRI5bEbT-) 64. (PDF) Self-Organized Criticality - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235741761_Self-Organized_Criticality](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/235741761_Self-Organized_Criticality%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482259258%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lJN-7hbJ0Y6KtoI5yw4o0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382104&usg=AOvVaw2G6fOHWA9R1wcRUjqk3qVw) 65. courses.physics.ucsd.edu, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2016/Spring/physics235/Turcotte-SOC%20Review.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2016/Spring/physics235/Turcotte-SOC%252520Review.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482259667%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1mw5QhSYcLPe5C5hPPThq1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382156&usg=AOvVaw2ecePt8wL0LXWId_xYWITl) 66. Self-Organized Criticality in Astrophysics: The Statistics of Nonlinear Processes in the Universe | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267116838_Self-organized_criticality_in_astrophysics_The_statistics_of_nonlinear_processes_in_the_universe](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/267116838_Self-organized_criticality_in_astrophysics_The_statistics_of_nonlinear_processes_in_the_universe%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482260423%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1lhlX4nYGBxS1yeqosqGOc&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382220&usg=AOvVaw0T0QTRR-2GZ8RnZ_Lgq4zL) 67. 25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Concepts and Controversies - ORFEO Home, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://orfeo.belnet.be/bitstream/handle/internal/2684/Watkins%282016%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://orfeo.belnet.be/bitstream/handle/internal/2684/Watkins%2525282016%252529.pdf?sequence%253D1%2526isAllowed%253Dy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482261075%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0z9rDKrpEzMjEJsOyp2Qm-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382283&usg=AOvVaw2yqvIK9FSyVLUGb2GmUhVQ) 68. [1403.6528] 25 Years of Self-Organized Criticality: Solar and Astrophysics - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6528](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6528%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482261548%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1tNH_yizPpBTLhkoyL2I6Q&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382338&usg=AOvVaw1Rm248KCz3q-ATpY5iyM6A) 69. Self-Organised Critical Dynamics as a Key to Fundamental Features of Complexity in Physical, Biological, and Social Networks - MDPI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8716/1/2/11](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2673-8716/1/2/11%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482262119%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1huYyWt-wCB19Fy9flIurD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382390&usg=AOvVaw1BzSXeQpSkPTnitnMvvzaL) 70. Universality in the Dynamics of Second-Order Phase Transitions - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258312338_Universality_in_the_Dynamics_of_Second-Order_Phase_Transitions](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/258312338_Universality_in_the_Dynamics_of_Second-Order_Phase_Transitions%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482262725%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2xGS3goDnxTaVp1souyQAK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382442&usg=AOvVaw3xnNKW1vLiD1MmIN5o6nGN) 71. Phase Transitions and Scaling in Systems Far from Equilibrium, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025444](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025444%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482263143%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw09u6_1dpucVw4cw64yPPWM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382499&usg=AOvVaw3uoe6FK6494FRS8bEIRxGh) 72. Universal critical exponents of nonequilibrium phase transitions from holography | Phys. Rev. D - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.106024](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.106024%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482263591%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw02FVClpYli4fFrYWe5id3o&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382555&usg=AOvVaw1HyJhu60n1mlB2lktMb5Xy) 73. Universal critical holography and domain wall formation | Phys. Rev. Research, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013096](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013096%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482264082%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Cwlj2sc_jOmt-dQ686X7U&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382616&usg=AOvVaw2IO38pwk8iWtcnyz5mLvVe) 74. Universal scaling in one-dimensional non-reciprocal matter - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.14384v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.14384v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482264513%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0DF4oPTU10IavZ9yRgK__j&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382668&usg=AOvVaw0eMR6hvwNCm4h-8rqbJS3R) 75. New Universality Classes and Multiple Transition Points in Systems [closed], accessed April 24, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/807086/new-universality-classes-and-multiple-transition-points-in-systems](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/807086/new-universality-classes-and-multiple-transition-points-in-systems%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482265131%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw290rf55Fun_x7KHiIpW3eK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382724&usg=AOvVaw1c3lh1_KVINBN0yYSMydG_) 76. Universal defect density scaling in an oscillating dynamic phase transition, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://omu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000965/files/2024000368.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://omu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000965/files/2024000368.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482265564%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3HIQUWe9XTqPZUQSugzQDY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382782&usg=AOvVaw1uQmT5ZSA4OO2HoQmY7x6X) 77. arXiv:2306.03803v4 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 23 Nov 2023, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.03803](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.03803%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482265890%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2cXfISQlz1ZllXdN1VO-_4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382835&usg=AOvVaw3dGXVOUnRp-Op7DgAgkRe1) 78. Metastable Cosmological Constant and Gravitational Bubbles: Ultra-Late-Time Transitions in Modified Gravity - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.11365v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.11365v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482266301%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2fHOOxC5hkqAGL3N79Z9bo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382889&usg=AOvVaw2YAye21o8Z6S0MRLEuayme) 79. A critical discussion on the H₀ tension - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2403.12796v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2403.12796v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482266613%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1Pa9u_zSlP9n0TAXAUVjlz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382945&usg=AOvVaw16A9Y6mY6Bd6RSPbrCVdvO) 80. 04_m215nys131120_13_.., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.sciencepub.net/newyork/nys131120/04_m215nys131120_13_29.docx](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.sciencepub.net/newyork/nys131120/04_m215nys131120_13_29.docx%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482266960%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0VC8LbAJAhRanysNbXkjqn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482382995&usg=AOvVaw1g5dbd6ZqLfaeVyIzxZPsG) 81. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies (Journal Article) - OSTI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1862246](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1862246%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482267479%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3EYtaHvbnDeH9tHXot7hyn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383054&usg=AOvVaw3zvUvp-aWh32OGxJR--zs0) 82. arXiv:2502.05393v1 [gr-qc] 8 Feb 2025, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.05393](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.05393%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482267881%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1TWBPuta0DrJWzkifFvpYg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383102&usg=AOvVaw0ZogSR5t6drRtQiSvJjKY3) 83. Cosmic inflation - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_inflation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_inflation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482268231%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3YgrH1ISwOgNKSBdRc4CED&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383149&usg=AOvVaw3KC2zR3cro7YPAHYh2crzl) 84. Introduction to Early Universe Cosmology - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.2271](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.2271%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482268533%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2kKhlggsTPrzfeaoL-2MXT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383217&usg=AOvVaw19IOGcelk_3npOLMnpfSbO) 85. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7340](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7340%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482268759%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0eLv49cb46EoynqM2vhFQf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383266&usg=AOvVaw2pLTEMLQtF_n_qsNlAFBD5) 86. Large-Scale Structure Formation via Quantum Fluctuations and Gravitational Instability, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=46224](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid%253D46224%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482269154%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3I1fvReKzJZSJ8s_sEXKNE&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383319&usg=AOvVaw1V6umXti2wIPowconq-UHd) 87. [1204.4918] Cosmological quantum entanglement - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4918](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4918%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482269445%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1y9ZhOChJB4-uRUN2-pz01&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383371&usg=AOvVaw0KgTsZ-mEjqgMVBx75iyJk) 88. [0906.4372] Structure Formation in the Early Universe - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4372](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4372%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482269747%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3YDY48Xa42p4v8EQs67xel&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383418&usg=AOvVaw0NiR4tyFZ5q0ibm5VnlqhA) 89. [astro-ph/9808149] Large-scale Structure from Quantum Fluctuations in the Early Universe, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9808149](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9808149%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482270096%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2KZxOS0XJbUgqQU93TaEO9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383470&usg=AOvVaw1EDeIv-xdz5aU0tESweUKS) 90. The impact of the dark matter on galaxy formation - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369048193_The_impact_of_the_dark_matter_on_galaxy_formation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/369048193_The_impact_of_the_dark_matter_on_galaxy_formation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482270600%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0J2xm65g72paImO_0VPOGh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383523&usg=AOvVaw2ol9zelSkerLBvngFveC-D) 91. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in tomographic Angular Density and Redshift Fluctuations, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2504.15506v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2504.15506v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482270939%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3kiWrJ1ibPCi-QhKknL2y4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383585&usg=AOvVaw0xDdAwOOhiIBpOsrxWjT7a) 92. Stars, Galaxies, and Beyond - McGoodwin.Net, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mcgoodwin.net/pages/astrophysics_2012.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mcgoodwin.net/pages/astrophysics_2012.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482271286%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw07ieC7UsNo2-airV4qKGJg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383633&usg=AOvVaw2f4p3MsPIhIgtf60FNJMrO) 93. Спіральний рукав галактики - Вікіпедія, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B2_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%2525D0%2525A1%2525D0%2525BF%2525D1%252596%2525D1%252580%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525BB%2525D1%25258C%2525D0%2525BD%2525D0%2525B8%2525D0%2525B9_%2525D1%252580%2525D1%252583%2525D0%2525BA%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525B2_%2525D0%2525B3%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525BB%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525BA%2525D1%252582%2525D0%2525B8%2525D0%2525BA%2525D0%2525B8%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482271843%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3uYbKT4C9k6OSgaCu8YrvI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383697&usg=AOvVaw1ghVSbEEfD6SvG6kdpoMoc) 94. Спиральный рукав — Рувики: Интернет-энциклопедия, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/%2525D0%2525A1%2525D0%2525BF%2525D0%2525B8%2525D1%252580%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525BB%2525D1%25258C%2525D0%2525BD%2525D1%25258B%2525D0%2525B9_%2525D1%252580%2525D1%252583%2525D0%2525BA%2525D0%2525B0%2525D0%2525B2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482272361%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0N2YObJOUQfyPXZOP1UrdT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383771&usg=AOvVaw2OwEvH4weZNlCorUBgughA) 95. A new long gamma-ray burst formation pathway at solar metallicity - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2502.09187](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2502.09187%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482272752%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2hBWfsOof2CSStSK-5vTEb&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383833&usg=AOvVaw2-4nimXzleMa48cBWyTK29) 96. (PDF) GRMHD Simulations and Modeling for Jet Formation and ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358260758_GRMHD_Simulations_and_Modeling_for_Jet_Formation_and_Acceleration_Region_in_AGNs](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/358260758_GRMHD_Simulations_and_Modeling_for_Jet_Formation_and_Acceleration_Region_in_AGNs%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482273293%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1Mlrdxz7cEQbzgb_XKkbCb&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383887&usg=AOvVaw1nJRFYGMM4tL8E6NHdO7BJ) 97. An Overview of Numerical Simulations in Accretion Physics - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.14224](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.14224%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482273609%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2p2sekEduAmf1HPoiAFGOa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482383951&usg=AOvVaw3p751bbFBP7B2qGM5gWaBP) 98. Evolution of Shock Structures and QPOs After Halting BHL Accretion onto Kerr Black Hole - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2503.16665](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2503.16665%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482273959%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2gs1GmYDBdcqNw-vOgF2So&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384004&usg=AOvVaw3D-ttiCs50tbrvEExcLqyP) 99. arXiv:2409.03371v1 [astro-ph.SR] 5 Sep 2024 - Caltech Astronomy, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://sites.astro.caltech.edu/~lah/review/starformation_kuruwita.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://sites.astro.caltech.edu/~lah/review/starformation_kuruwita.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482274392%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1bB6_E087YUtcO0BdkI5Iz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384054&usg=AOvVaw2DNsCNPFwtIcHDLwSMloai) 100. GRRMHD resolution study - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.16236](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.16236%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482274675%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw15VU-5RgoNvygLNS0Tfzm-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384106&usg=AOvVaw3bEfGEMuAnNE_SkrNS8o0e) 101. Experiments relevant to astrophysical jets (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1574717](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1574717%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482275079%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3uI2Wxh_u4-QneKq5w55sU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384157&usg=AOvVaw0eKweyDCzp_im0BCmmBDyP) 102. Planetary Rings | Astronomy - Lumen Learning, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-astronomy/chapter/planetary-rings/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-astronomy/chapter/planetary-rings/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482275504%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Fn705lBsRDgfkir8JT1kr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384205&usg=AOvVaw0seiiaX1rO0bYtrgngXH8e) 103. Rings, Moons, and Pluto | Intro to Astronomy Class Notes | Fiveable, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/intro-astronomy/unit-12](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/intro-astronomy/unit-12%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482275923%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2d-ydSrb-R-6lyS1bmg4tO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384258&usg=AOvVaw1ApqSp-c9x8J0plqSzgKWo) 104. Rings of Saturn - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rings_of_Saturn](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rings_of_Saturn%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482276228%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2FyUEJrw2GChY4I1X8NwM3&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384310&usg=AOvVaw193Be1b2i8suwq1x32976F) 105. arXiv:nlin/0410028v1 [nlin.CD] 18 Oct 2004, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/nlin/0410028](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/nlin/0410028%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482276546%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1RTX4ypzvMwzYFMmbgD6BF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384358&usg=AOvVaw0PxJmg15NO1Q4rSzA_UK2_) 106. planetary ring particles: Topics by Science.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/planetary+ring+particles](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/planetary%252Bring%252Bparticles%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482276899%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw10rLIYzklo-uc5MxPH6gv0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384408&usg=AOvVaw1ZM3Fd8T6KcODXPXQMbvvD) 107. (PDF) The missing rings around Solar System moons - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383267233_The_missing_rings_around_Solar_System_moons](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/383267233_The_missing_rings_around_Solar_System_moons%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482277395%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3yvLFL6IEJJQqdQQcK_95L&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384461&usg=AOvVaw3Z8kE7XZHPCyQgYdMRHnDb) 108. Orbital Period Ratios and Fibonacci Numbers in Solar Planetary and ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386818445_Orbital_Period_Ratios_and_Fibonacci_Numbers_in_Solar_Planetary_and_Satellite_Systems_and_in_Exoplanetary_Systems](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/386818445_Orbital_Period_Ratios_and_Fibonacci_Numbers_in_Solar_Planetary_and_Satellite_Systems_and_in_Exoplanetary_Systems%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482278013%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3szPFSbrB5vjqvJbkBoHlY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384524&usg=AOvVaw0L6i7wofB1m5x8tyWzoghu) 109. Chaos in the Solar System - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2234523_Chaos_in_the_Solar_System](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/2234523_Chaos_in_the_Solar_System%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482278511%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2a4AKyEU7GXszhB4T3OFjn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384596&usg=AOvVaw3y464biSiZflAa3f_fZ-wu) 110. Scaling, mirror symmetries and consonances among the distances of the planets of the solar system - The Chrysalis Foundation, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.chrysalis-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2202.03939-2.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.chrysalis-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2202.03939-2.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482279049%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2-OpcgjWMb3zPSnq1P9EiS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384653&usg=AOvVaw3adXT5d9R_1PU_c7OiALja) 111. A simple model for the location of Saturn's F ring, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://www.maia.ub.es/dsg/2016/1605jorba.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://www.maia.ub.es/dsg/2016/1605jorba.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482279447%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1BnY2jQCZeGXd482oS1RyT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384705&usg=AOvVaw1K4tDFffNzhHEdsTFZcP3j) 112. Imaging Science Subsystem - PDS Atmospheres Node, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pds-atmospheres.nmsu.edu/data_and_services/atmospheres_data/Cassini/Cassini/Cassini_Final_RPT/Cassssini%20Final%20Rpt%202019_Vol%201%20-%20ISSsdpdf%20%5Bpreview%5D.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pds-atmospheres.nmsu.edu/data_and_services/atmospheres_data/Cassini/Cassini/Cassini_Final_RPT/Cassssini%252520Final%252520Rpt%2525202019_Vol%2525201%252520-%252520ISSsdpdf%252520%25255Bpreview%25255D.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482280097%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0GI3y1xQ7AcvQCX7f7uofd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384762&usg=AOvVaw2KyPUeKmkl-nRfCQeyXGB7) 113. A theory of pattern formation for reaction–diffusion systems on temporal networks | Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences - Journals, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2020.0753](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2020.0753%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482280714%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2r1DV53p3ExaxpB9xheAt-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384839&usg=AOvVaw2KgxvwZGWGMVac5v2avYHB) 114. Pattern formation from spatially heterogeneous reaction–diffusion systems | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences - Journals, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2021.0001](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2021.0001%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482281355%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1SIAWvBMIotO3ba2jVmzPe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384903&usg=AOvVaw0QKrJ3G8lMXtN3FxibkBfm) 115. Cellular Automata Representation: An Overview, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/cellular-automata-representation-an-overview-17744.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/cellular-automata-representation-an-overview-17744.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482281844%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2MqdcYQ7AJ_N_Sbe-0xddT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482384959&usg=AOvVaw2GT4pIHoJB_VeOa21PTudE) 116. Cellular automata approach to modeling self-organized periodic patterns in nanoparticle-doped liquid crystals | Phys. Rev. E, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044705](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044705%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482282485%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3GIz2kTiz42HWcES9lSaZ9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385018&usg=AOvVaw3B0NUgIvU6jvFj_jfwXayX) 117. Cellular Automata and Modeling of Complex Physical Systems: Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, February 21–28, 1989 (Springer Proceedings in Physics) - Amazon.com, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.amazon.com/Cellular-Automata-Modeling-Complex-Physical/dp/3642752616](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.amazon.com/Cellular-Automata-Modeling-Complex-Physical/dp/3642752616%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482283155%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw021EiNZOyShbhBmqqtH4b0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385076&usg=AOvVaw19ot1hJukvpaARS53cqxpA) 118. Exploration of cellular automata: a comprehensive review of dynamic modeling across biology, computer and materials science, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.cmms.agh.edu.pl/public_repo/2023_4_0820.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.cmms.agh.edu.pl/public_repo/2023_4_0820.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482283613%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3P2E9EfAViPVnQR0SWy807&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385132&usg=AOvVaw3RZn4WvRpxBudhh1O85BaP) 119. CELLULAR AUTOMATA AND LATTICE BOLTZMANN TECHNIQUES: AN APPROACH TO MODEL AND SIMULATE COMPLEX SYSTEMS - World Scientific Publishing, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0219525902000602](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0219525902000602%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482284069%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1jb_ICmdrQyiCZKkC0Iwq2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385187&usg=AOvVaw2-mzZ2c7ObhABE7bm8zA1A) 120. Network theory - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482284349%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3V7jqTtjEWMn0QGsoHgvid&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385238&usg=AOvVaw2DB45DPD8pr0Gvpf1q0evJ) 121. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks | SIAM Review, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/S003614450342480](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/S003614450342480%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482284693%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw16DtDDIXy-V9LWfaOugtul&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385290&usg=AOvVaw3ZO8EraDp-8BZ7b4kgIN4E) 122. Reconstructing the evolution history of networked complex systems - PMC, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10987487/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10987487/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482285041%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0YF0flC5gNObtZOc-vkiji&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385340&usg=AOvVaw0dgFBDskDBfqOgsOVT0csv) 123. Overview of Network Theory, I - Computer Science | UC Davis Engineering, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~raissa/Classes/253-S23/lec1-2023.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~raissa/Classes/253-S23/lec1-2023.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482285424%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2YU-kJIkREryaD_kBBOks-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385392&usg=AOvVaw2S8yjuaQx8LTW_ganaNLh-) 124. Fluid Dynamics Sep 2022 - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/list/physics.flu-dyn/2022-09?skip=0&show=1000](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/list/physics.flu-dyn/2022-09?skip%253D0%2526show%253D1000%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482285815%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1s17f8_ieU8nf2QuM776YI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385443&usg=AOvVaw35vegH3_ozt8qtxzQTBDSg) 125. Physics - Turbulent convection - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Physics.2.74](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Physics.2.74%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482286204%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2yMUppEttyLWRV3m6BkJhY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385494&usg=AOvVaw2tyaToyfWHuSem1doHbkhZ) 126. Theory of Pattern Formation - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.ds.mpg.de/publication-search/3859715?person=%2Fpersons%2Fresource%2Fpersons228505](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.ds.mpg.de/publication-search/3859715?person%253D/persons/resource/persons228505%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482286662%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3A30HTqeSl27_t9Kl6cjjB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385546&usg=AOvVaw14ezel4bUDoPnbccUQ7S46) 127. Large-scale mean patterns in turbulent convection | Journal of Fluid Mechanics, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/largescale-mean-patterns-in-turbulent-convection/D270A870157D954D91E68730BB42D363](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/largescale-mean-patterns-in-turbulent-convection/D270A870157D954D91E68730BB42D363%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482287266%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3OIxqf1IFO56Qb4Zft0Z2D&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385608&usg=AOvVaw1X9dzdNSRESpE-Dl4e3lrc) 128. ‪Xander M. de Wit‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7H8esIoAAAAJ&hl=it](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user%253D7H8esIoAAAAJ%2526hl%253Dit%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482287616%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0T0jIMwJ7u-fuobpK4D-Gn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385666&usg=AOvVaw37uIaJ6eobV40I2OHwy86J) 129. ‪Xander M. de Wit‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://scholar.google.com.hk/citations?user=7H8esIoAAAAJ&hl=en](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://scholar.google.com.hk/citations?user%253D7H8esIoAAAAJ%2526hl%253Den%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482287973%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2a5dAIjCkY1UcraWCGxMiU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385720&usg=AOvVaw1XbAc5kWkQuwbHO-jg1s4o) 130. Federico Toschi's articles on arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/a/toschi_f_1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/a/toschi_f_1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482288245%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2B-Mls72Rg614Vwmn5mmhi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385770&usg=AOvVaw3ohx3PHhT5xmISvwuD8JdO) 131. Cellular automata as models of complexity | Wolfram, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://content.wolfram.com/sw-publications/2020/07/cellular-automata-models-complexity.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://content.wolfram.com/sw-publications/2020/07/cellular-automata-models-complexity.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482288745%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0pmMiKpkWGL-CrEYudfBnv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385833&usg=AOvVaw3T0Wi9sWQH3qUBhIY5Zo3r) 132. Information Theory for Complex Systems Scientists: What, Why, & How? - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2304.12482v4](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2304.12482v4%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482289098%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1a3RbJnnUYVqfUWfvZ37Na&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385888&usg=AOvVaw19LeelvcMc8NBUg4vmCtmn) 133. Entropy measures and their applications: A comprehensive review - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.15660v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.15660v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482289426%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2JL-Znuk62-wXyaSsUDwws&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385936&usg=AOvVaw2ZaV_YwJX_7DfNEMYYao_K) 134. Quantifying Emergence in terms of Persistent Mutual Information - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263912384_Quantifying_Emergence_in_terms_of_Persistent_Mutual_Information](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/263912384_Quantifying_Emergence_in_terms_of_Persistent_Mutual_Information%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482290022%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3m3-2dKKeKYVf5-2VujkVe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482385992&usg=AOvVaw2M2A-1fUR4IXh-uRHlhyh1) 135. Information-theoretic study of pattern formation: Rate of entropy production of random fractals - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13388511_Information-theoretic_study_of_pattern_formation_Rate_of_entropy_production_of_random_fractals](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/13388511_Information-theoretic_study_of_pattern_formation_Rate_of_entropy_production_of_random_fractals%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482290730%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0kzyDIK1TcRX3KDz6VLZfh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386053&usg=AOvVaw3RjX-q4FQhkFM3lOXtOLCB) 136. Causal Emergence 2.0: Quantifying emergent complexity - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.13395](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.13395%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482291064%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0uaezTUEPJ5qxa3BdrmxfJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386110&usg=AOvVaw1U2fxa93U_4RsSdMmwGQJR) 137. Finding emergence in data by maximizing effective information - Oxford Academic, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwae279/7732052](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwae279/7732052%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482291541%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0YQB4f568xrRznlTJhGdPL&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386161&usg=AOvVaw0UR-Md5leSX_lJRFYQ8WPz) 138. Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey of Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studies - MDPI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/2/108](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/2/108%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482291962%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0gAYpR1gG9VcapkEc8OeVc&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386231&usg=AOvVaw3ue6kOPW_5Og_pE1Z6DM6T) 139. Kolmogorov complexity - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482292294%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw16PW4GIIWHaLdUlom22FpK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386279&usg=AOvVaw0asdJqCrul-yGTzWD_H1On) 140. Algorithmic Information Theory | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220486268_Algorithmic_Information_Theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/220486268_Algorithmic_Information_Theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482292724%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ua3T7UktOn8E7ONu6vrQg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386331&usg=AOvVaw0cieszl26ZJXRlN_7J2eMt) 141. Algorithmic Information Theory - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.2754](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.2754%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482292992%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0W0-pTMlmyll_9eFTY8mCV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386383&usg=AOvVaw1KvuL2deadUJp4LVLwfj2u) 142. Complexity Measures - Cosma Shalizi, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://bactra.org/notebooks/complexity-measures.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://bactra.org/notebooks/complexity-measures.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482293349%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2MKjnugzSNXNPd6Ljwn2wt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386431&usg=AOvVaw10ML_hsqiTl0wP7JHZh2i_) 143. Topological Kolmogorov complexity and the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless mechanism, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2305.05396v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2305.05396v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482293716%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2yqrDI_o0tYYRMZJCEWHwz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386481&usg=AOvVaw3ThgLOG4KjOJpc_P-d7pJe) 144. Anthropic principle - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482294015%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3xGlc1JFAt2dzOO480M1Mj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386533&usg=AOvVaw3V09sgRHHUb5RpnU7wiXyq) 145. Anthropic principle | Cosmology, Physics & Philosophy - Britannica, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/science/anthropic-principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/science/anthropic-principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482294368%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw01x2BT4a8d6ILEVFhB-328&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386631&usg=AOvVaw1nkoKJaYg4X0B9k5zV8B1A) 146. Anthropic principle and fine-tuning arguments | Cosmology Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/cosmology/unit-15/anthropic-principle-fine-tuning-arguments/study-guide/HewYVwQo7Hpj6Kdd](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/cosmology/unit-15/anthropic-principle-fine-tuning-arguments/study-guide/HewYVwQo7Hpj6Kdd%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482294982%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw221JyMJkY9WcCfe3MKDZlQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386686&usg=AOvVaw0Rxa5siRZnEHgKuc2weWjC) 147. The Anthropic Principle | Intro to Astronomy Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/intro-astronomy/unit-29/7-anthropic-principle/study-guide/cLDIxXRWhgvqSyK0](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/intro-astronomy/unit-29/7-anthropic-principle/study-guide/cLDIxXRWhgvqSyK0%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482295495%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw30c-x5eAkHSit51jcuKUj2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386745&usg=AOvVaw2Xy3keplY6UTQYCPWZzMdO) 148. philsci-archive.pitt.edu, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11529/1/Naturalness%2C_the_Autonomy_of_Scales%2C_and_the_125_GeV_Higgs.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11529/1/Naturalness%25252C_the_Autonomy_of_Scales%25252C_and_the_125_GeV_Higgs.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482295913%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0UsBrU48z-eXbZ9mF3waXX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386800&usg=AOvVaw34klTuCFgLqRGcSA021oiU) 149. Naturalness as a reasonable scientific principle in fundamental physics - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.03036](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.03036%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482296319%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2UJHcNdG5sHzbzMVsdx79p&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386865&usg=AOvVaw25gE61yxupmPjwqUkV0w5L) 150. Deriving Ontological Statements from the Unnatural Higgs Mass - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.20282](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.20282%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482296721%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3X0Nq9Ws3fvdD_V1m-OmPg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386915&usg=AOvVaw3CfgQ6fV-v16XayVEjg4ty) 151. The Dawn of the Post-Naturalness Era - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320583074_The_Dawn_of_the_Post-Naturalness_Era](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/320583074_The_Dawn_of_the_Post-Naturalness_Era%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482297177%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1UHZOr-cdUDeGKuWYMicGm&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482386964&usg=AOvVaw3ycvATrV-mwCUCnABZfuvH) 152. Anthropic Explanations in Cosmology: A Critical Review - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1609/1/Anthropic_Explanations_in_Cosmology_%282003%29.doc](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1609/1/Anthropic_Explanations_in_Cosmology_%2525282003%252529.doc%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482297802%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2nV0Nr800RygVdR0AzvmrO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387023&usg=AOvVaw0Y-4TPsWdXGyoGNPymFv6u) 153. lss.fnal.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2019/pub/fermilab-pub-19-431-ae-scd.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2019/pub/fermilab-pub-19-431-ae-scd.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482298170%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw04JWJQU1El0e1rMoB-hmeu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387075&usg=AOvVaw22_2YPLEz1pMaW1IfeXvRp) 154. MUltiplexed Survey Telescope: Perspectives for Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Survey - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2411.07970v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2411.07970v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482298613%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2rRKA8icz8eMkNxKJUbnj8&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387130&usg=AOvVaw2HzojHj4JDhSXbm1RoJ4M3) 155. Euclid preparation I. The Euclid Wide Survey | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362320938_Euclid_preparation_I_The_Euclid_Wide_Survey](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/362320938_Euclid_preparation_I_The_Euclid_Wide_Survey%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482299080%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw22J-x-oJcKJdCQrdbtrFGW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387181&usg=AOvVaw2Z28ISa_fQu_0dnspVkRmp) 156. lss.fnal.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2023/conf/fermilab-conf-23-008-ad-nd-ppd-scd.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2023/conf/fermilab-conf-23-008-ad-nd-ppd-scd.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482299429%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1xqra_EE32qddLJ4tcQ6iB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387234&usg=AOvVaw0ZhJtS1vuGMzsnHxIoFaQ1) 157. Berkeley Cosmology Group Seminars, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://cosmology.lbl.gov/bcg_seminars_16_17.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://cosmology.lbl.gov/bcg_seminars_16_17.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482299739%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2lqAmes7jpTfMXuWGanYXF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387284&usg=AOvVaw2E8v4kO3o5S1mBTe9lpsVT) 158. Untitled - Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Cambridge |, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.kicc.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/KICC10_booklet.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.kicc.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/KICC10_booklet.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482300116%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2LMyBhCPiU5o7QzbojCzrg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387334&usg=AOvVaw1bSOo8mEfjdW9yHiVIC9VY) 159. HEP Theory Seminar Recordings | William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute | College of Science and Engineering - University of Minnesota, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://cse.umn.edu/ftpi/hep-theory-seminar-recordings](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://cse.umn.edu/ftpi/hep-theory-seminar-recordings%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482300696%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw13F4e43_VvzMeSaNYGKQpf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387389&usg=AOvVaw3JgPKZJaBsEoH03OZzIxla) 160. REVIEW OF PARTICLE PHYSICS* Particle Data Group, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pdg.lbl.gov/2017/download/rpp2016-Chin.Phys.C.40.100001.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pdg.lbl.gov/2017/download/rpp2016-Chin.Phys.C.40.100001.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482301110%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1JQHW9VwQU5YTtorjEY7-5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387441&usg=AOvVaw2RTx0qejl-oZ3laYBAeNJu) 161. REVIEW OF PARTICLE PHYSICS* Particle Data Group, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pdg.lbl.gov/2015/download/rpp2014-Chin.Phys.C.38.090001.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pdg.lbl.gov/2015/download/rpp2014-Chin.Phys.C.38.090001.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482301514%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3vJsrwhWa6-Of0bUKL9k4S&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387496&usg=AOvVaw2BhtPBt6vEgITB7l4X4WIg) 162. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science - Volume 68, 2018, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/nucl/68/1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/nucl/68/1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482301868%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2sImv3eWbjWh4hfSauWCk0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387548&usg=AOvVaw16qEnasATrcraA0e2pAgYk) 163. Understanding the Principles of Pattern Formation Driven by Notch Signaling by Integrating Experiments and Theoretical Models - PubMed Central, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7411240/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7411240/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745455482302340%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Rynti7LoTKBEfhP_BGkRQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745455482387605&usg=AOvVaw1zH_eDiRFZsgGsWlaIbxcg)