Gravity: Pattern Formation Principle? # Gravity as a Manifestation of Principles Driving Pattern Formation and Persistence ## I. Introduction: Reframing Gravity ### A. The Core Hypothesis The prevailing understanding of gravity, codified in Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (GR), describes it as a geometric phenomenon: the curvature of spacetime dictated by the distribution of mass and energy Quantum gravity (QG) research primarily seeks to reconcile this geometric picture with quantum mechanics, often by attempting to quantize spacetime itself or by positing the existence of a force mediator, the graviton This report explores a conceptually distinct hypothesis: that gravity, rather than being a passive consequence of pre-existing stable patterns (massy objects) or a fundamental force acting between them, might represent a deeper, more active principle. Specifically, it investigates the possibility that gravity is, or is a core aspect of, the fundamental principle(s) that drive the very formation, aggregation, and long-term persistence of stable patterns or structures within the universe. This perspective shifts the role of gravity from one that primarily responds to the presence of matter and energy, as described by the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) where the stress-energy tensor Tμν​ sources spacetime curvature Gμν​ 1, to one that governs the emergence and stability of those sources themselves. Instead of viewing gravity as a field generated by patterns, this hypothesis considers gravity as embodying the underlying rules or biases in the universe's dynamics that favor the formation and endurance of complex, organized states over homogeneity or rapid dissolution. It asks not just how patterns interact gravitationally, but why stable, aggregated patterns exist and persist in the first place, proposing that the answer is intrinsically linked to the nature of gravity itself. This reframing potentially places gravity at a more fundamental level than geometry or force, embedding it within the very logic that permits structure to arise from underlying processes or events. Such a viewpoint implies a fundamental departure from frameworks where gravity is quantized as a field analogous to electromagnetism 4 and offers a different lens through which to view the challenges of unifying gravity with other physical principles. ### B. Foundational Concepts Implicated The hypothesis draws upon several foundational concepts prevalent in modern theoretical physics, suggesting that the principle(s) underlying gravity might be deeply connected to: 1. Information and Distinguishability: Stable patterns represent configurations with distinguishable states, embodying information. The hypothesis suggests an inherent tendency for distinguishable states or information to influence each other's formation and persistence, potentially acting as a bias in the rules governing sequences of events [User Query]. This resonates with ideas linking gravity to information content, such as in entropic gravity proposals 6 and the holographic principle Constructor theory also formalizes information physically based on possible transformations 2. Contextuality and Relationality: The probability of a pattern forming or persisting at a specific location (X) could be strongly dependent on the context provided by patterns at other locations (Y). Gravity would then manifest as this long-range contextual dependence influencing pattern stability [User Query]. This aligns with relational interpretations of physics, such as Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM), where properties arise from interactions and relations rather than being intrinsic 3. Conservation Laws: Conservation principles often involve densities and flows. The hypothesis posits that the conserved quantity (e.g., an energy analogue) might naturally tend to concentrate, and the principles governing its flow and concentration manifest as gravity. Stable patterns (mass) would represent these concentrations [User Query]. This connects to the fundamental role of conservation laws in physics 14 and their potential link to emergent gravity phenomena 4. Locality and Causality: Despite the potential for long-range correlations or contextual dependence, any influence exerted by the pattern-forming principle must respect the finite speed of light and the causal structure of spacetime. The influence is not instantaneous but propagates, creating retarded effects consistent with observation [User Query]. This constraint is paramount in theories like Causal Set Theory (CST) 16 and is a key feature of relativistic field theories, including those emerging from AdS/CFT Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation of GR also inherently relies on local causal horizons These concepts collectively suggest a picture where gravity is woven into the fabric of physical law at a level governing information processing, relational dependencies, and the dynamics of conserved quantities, all constrained by causality. ### C. Contrast with Standard Paradigms To appreciate the novelty of the hypothesis, it is essential to contrast it with established and mainstream alternative approaches: - General Relativity (GR): GR provides a highly successful geometric description of gravity. Spacetime is a dynamic entity whose curvature is determined by the distribution of mass and energy via the EFE: Gμν​+Λgμν​=c48πG​Tμν​ In this framework, gravity is a manifestation of spacetime geometry, a passive consequence of the matter and energy already present. The hypothesis reverses this logic, suggesting the principle we call gravity is responsible for the formation and stability of the Tμν​ term itself, implying a deeper, potentially pre-geometric origin. While GR describes how mass curves spacetime, the hypothesis asks why mass clumps and persists in a way that allows it to curve spacetime, suggesting gravity is part of the answer to the "why." - Quantum Gravity (QG): Most QG programs aim to reconcile GR with quantum mechanics, typically by quantizing the gravitational field (leading to gravitons) or spacetime itself (as in Loop Quantum Gravity) These approaches generally treat gravity as a fundamental force requiring quantization, analogous to other forces in the Standard Model. The hypothesis differs fundamentally by proposing gravity might not be a force in the conventional sense, but rather a principle governing pattern formation. If gravity is a principle related to information or complexity, quantizing it directly might be conceptually inappropriate, akin to trying to quantize the laws of thermodynamics rather than the underlying statistical mechanics This aligns more with emergent gravity philosophies but specifies the emergent mechanism as the driver of patterns. - Emergent Gravity (General): The hypothesis shares ground with the broad idea of emergent gravity – the notion that gravity is not fundamental but arises from more basic underlying degrees of freedom or principles Examples include gravity emerging from thermodynamics 20, quantum entanglement 26, or other microscopic dynamics. However, the hypothesis is more specific: it posits that gravity is the principle that drives the emergence and persistence of patterns (matter, structure), not merely a statistical force or effect that results from the collective behavior or information content of those patterns once formed. It attributes an active, organizational role to gravity at the foundational level. This distinction implies a potentially profound shift: if gravity is intrinsically linked to the principles allowing stable matter to exist, the conventional separation between the "stage" (spacetime/gravity) and the "actors" (matter/energy) might dissolve at a fundamental level. The rules governing the actors' formation and persistence are the stage's properties. This potential for unification, moving beyond simply describing interactions to explaining the existence of the interactors, is a key motivation for exploring the hypothesis. ### D. Report Objectives and Structure This report aims to provide a critical, expert-level analysis of the hypothesis that gravity is a manifestation of fundamental principles driving pattern formation and persistence. The analysis will evaluate the conceptual coherence of the hypothesis, explore its connections to existing theoretical frameworks, identify potential mechanisms and analogies, assess its capacity to explain cosmological phenomena, and critically examine the significant challenges it faces, particularly in recovering the mathematical formalism of General Relativity. The structure is as follows: - Section II reviews frameworks linking gravity to information and thermodynamics, establishing the context of emergent gravity ideas. - Section III delves into foundational structures and principles (causal sets, constructor theory, relationality, conservation laws, Mach's principle) relevant to the hypothesis's core concepts. - Section IV explores analogies from pattern formation, complexity science, and specific physical models (like fracton gravity) where aggregation arises from underlying rules. - Section V addresses the major challenges, particularly recovering GR, defining a mechanism, and discusses cosmological implications (structure formation, dark energy), culminating in a comparative assessment. - Section VI concludes with a summary judgment, a recap of strengths and weaknesses, and an outlook on future directions. ## II. Gravity, Information, and Thermodynamics: Emergent Perspectives The hypothesis that gravity is linked to pattern formation principles finds resonance within a broader movement in theoretical physics exploring connections between gravity, information, and thermodynamics. These approaches suggest gravity might not be a fundamental interaction but an emergent phenomenon arising from deeper, often informational or statistical, underpinnings. ### A. Thermodynamic Origins: From Black Holes to Spacetime The modern conception of gravity as potentially thermodynamic or informational began with the study of black holes. Bekenstein proposed that black holes possess entropy proportional to their event horizon area, SBH​∝A Hawking's discovery of black hole radiation confirmed they have a temperature, TH​, solidifying the link between black hole mechanics and thermodynamics This Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, SBH​=A/(4LP2​) (where LP​ is the Planck length, setting kB​=c=ℏ=1), suggested that gravitational entropy scales with area, not volume, a crucial hint towards holography This connection was dramatically generalized by Jacobson in 1995.20 He demonstrated that the Einstein Field Equations can be derived by assuming the fundamental thermodynamic relation δQ=TdS holds for local Rindler horizons at every point in spacetime Here, δQ is interpreted as the heat flux (boost energy of matter) crossing the horizon, T is the local Unruh temperature experienced by an accelerated observer just inside the horizon (T=κ/2π, where κ is the acceleration/surface gravity), and dS is assumed proportional to the change in the horizon area, dS=ηδA, with η a universal entropy density per unit area The consistency requirement, demanding this thermodynamic balance holds for all null directions (all possible local Rindler horizons) at every point, forces the spacetime geometry to curve in response to matter energy flux precisely according to the EFE, with Newton's constant G related to the entropy density η (G=1/(4η)) Jacobson's derivation positions the EFE as an "equation of state" for spacetime, analogous to p=T(∂S/∂V) in fluid thermodynamics It suggests that GR is not fundamental but emerges as a macroscopic description of the statistical mechanics of underlying microscopic degrees of freedom, valid under conditions of local thermodynamic equilibrium This thermodynamic perspective provides a strong precedent for viewing gravity as emergent and linked to entropy/information associated with causal boundaries (horizons). Critiques and alternative interpretations exist, questioning the assumption of equilibrium or the nature of the underlying degrees of freedom 32, or exploring non-equilibrium extensions 30, but the core idea that EFE can arise from thermodynamics remains influential ### B. Entropic Gravity: Verlinde's Proposal and Its Critiques Building on the thermodynamic connection and the holographic principle, Erik Verlinde proposed in 2009 that gravity is an entropic force His core argument is that gravity arises from changes in the information (measured as entropy) associated with the positions of material bodies, analogous to the elastic force in a polymer resisting displacement from its maximum entropy state Verlinde postulates holographic screens encoding information about matter within a region, with the number of bits proportional to the screen area. When a test mass approaches a screen, the entropy associated with the screen changes, ΔS=2πkB​mcΔx/ℏ. Using the Unruh temperature T=ℏa/(2πckB​) for an observer accelerating with the test mass, the thermodynamic relation FΔx=TΔS yields Newton's second law, F=ma He further derives Newton's law of gravitation by assuming equipartition of energy among the bits on a spherical screen Verlinde argues that even inertia is entropic, arising from the absence of entropy gradients, and suggests the framework can be extended relativistically to recover the EFE Some versions attempt to explain Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) or dark matter effects as arising from volume-law entropy contributions at cosmological scales Despite initial excitement and media attention 7, Verlinde's specific proposal faced significant criticism: - Thermodynamic Analogy Flaws: The analogy with polymer physics was shown to be problematic. Critics argued that the test particle lacks well-defined thermodynamic properties (temperature, entropy), the direction of energy flow is inconsistent with the polymer example, and the holographic screen does not function as a proper heat bath in thermal equilibrium Crucially, the entropy increase of the screen appears to be caused by the work done by gravity, rather than being the statistical driver of the gravitational force - Quantum Coherence and Reversibility: A major objection is that entropic forces typically arise from irreversible thermodynamic processes involving averaging over many microstates. Such processes would likely destroy quantum coherence, contradicting experiments (like neutron interferometry in gravitational fields) that show quantum coherence is preserved under gravity Gravity appears fundamentally reversible at the microscopic level, unlike typical entropic forces - Experimental Contradictions: Some analyses claimed that experiments with ultra-cold neutrons in gravitational fields directly contradict the predictions of Verlinde's model Furthermore, studies of dwarf galaxy rotation curves were found to be inconsistent with the theory's predictions intended to replace dark matter - Theoretical Inconsistencies: Questions were raised about the consistency of the approach with fundamental principles like energy-momentum conservation and its applicability beyond highly symmetric scenarios The assumption that ordinary spacetime surfaces obey thermodynamic laws like horizons was also challenged While Verlinde's specific entropic force model is widely considered problematic 35, it significantly contributed to the exploration of gravity's emergence from information and entropy, directly aligning with the conceptual space of the hypothesis under investigation. The failures of this model, particularly regarding quantum coherence and reversibility, serve as crucial constraints: any successful information-based principle for gravity must be fundamentally compatible with quantum mechanics, suggesting that classical thermodynamic analogies may be insufficient. A quantum informational framework might be necessary. ### C. Quantum Information Approaches: Entanglement, Complexity, and Gravity More recent approaches directly leverage concepts from quantum information theory to understand gravity, potentially offering a path consistent with quantum mechanics. Ginestra Bianconi proposed a framework deriving gravity from quantum relative entropy This approach treats spacetime as a quantum system and defines a gravitational action based on the informational distance (relative entropy) between the spacetime metric and an effective metric induced by matter fields. Varying this entropic action yields modified Einstein equations that recover standard GR in weak-field limits but also naturally predict a small, positive cosmological constant, potentially explaining dark energy The framework also introduces an auxiliary field (G-field) that might serve as an alternative explanation for dark matter phenomena This explicitly links gravitational dynamics to a measure of quantum information difference. Another powerful connection emerged from the AdS/CFT correspondence (discussed below). The Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) formula relates the entanglement entropy of a boundary region in the CFT to the area of a minimal surface in the bulk AdS spacetime homologous to that region: SEE​=Area(γA​)/(4GN​) This provides a concrete geometric realization of entanglement entropy. Subsequent work extended this to covariant (HRT) and quantum-corrected (QES) versions, further strengthening the link between quantum entanglement structure and spacetime geometry Furthermore, quantum complexity—the difficulty of preparing a quantum state from a reference state—has also been proposed as dual to geometric quantities in AdS/CFT. Two main conjectures exist: Complexity=Volume (CV), relating complexity to the volume of a maximal spatial slice in the bulk ending on the boundary time slice 26, and Complexity=Action (CA), relating it to the gravitational action evaluated on a specific spacetime region (the Wheeler-DeWitt patch). These conjectures suggest that the growth of complexity in the boundary quantum system corresponds to the growth of spacetime volume or action behind black hole horizons These quantum information approaches directly map geometric features (area, volume, curvature via EFE) to quantum informational quantities (entropy, complexity). They support the hypothesis's core idea that gravity is deeply intertwined with information, potentially providing quantitative tools if the proposed "pattern-forming principle" can be rigorously formulated in terms of quantum information dynamics. The idea that spacetime itself might emerge from the entanglement structure of underlying quantum degrees of freedom is a recurring theme in this research ### D. The Holographic Principle and AdS/CFT The holographic principle, inspired by black hole thermodynamics, posits that the description of a volume of space can be encoded on its lower-dimensional boundary It suggests that the maximum information content (entropy) of a region scales with its boundary area, not its volume, implying a fundamental limit of roughly one degree of freedom per Planck area (A/4LP2​) This principle challenges the notion of locality in quantum field theory, where degrees of freedom exist at every spacetime point, suggesting our usual description might be highly redundant The Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, conjectured by Maldacena in 1997, provides the most concrete realization of the holographic principle It states an exact equivalence (duality) between a theory of quantum gravity (specifically, string theory or M-theory) in a d+1-dimensional asymptotically AdS spacetime and a d-dimensional Conformal Field Theory (a quantum field theory without gravity) living on the boundary of that spacetime AdS/CFT implies that the entire bulk gravitational physics, including spacetime geometry and dynamics, emerges from the non-gravitational boundary CFT Locality in the bulk spacetime is an emergent property derived from the structure of correlations in the boundary CFT The finite propagation speed in the bulk is inherited from the causality constraints of the boundary CFT This duality provides a powerful theoretical laboratory demonstrating how spacetime and gravity can emerge from a lower-dimensional, non-gravitational quantum system governed by specific rules (the CFT dynamics) While AdS/CFT doesn't directly implement the hypothesis (gravity isn't the principle governing the CFT itself), it demonstrates that the kind of emergence the hypothesis requires—spacetime and its dynamics arising from underlying rules governing information/degrees of freedom—is theoretically possible and consistent with locality and causality. The area-law scaling of entanglement entropy via the RT formula 26 reinforces the informational constraints suggested by holography. The convergence of ideas from black hole thermodynamics, Jacobson's derivation, entropic gravity proposals, quantum information geometry, and holography points towards a deep connection between gravity and information (entropy, entanglement, complexity). These frameworks suggest that information might be a more fundamental variable than classical geometry. The hypothesis under investigation builds on this trend, proposing that gravity is the principle governing how this information organizes itself into persistent patterns. Furthermore, the consistent appearance of area laws across these diverse approaches hints that if gravity is indeed a pattern-forming principle related to information, its influence might naturally scale with surface area, potentially offering a fundamental explanation for the macroscopic effectiveness of the inverse-square law associated with gravity generated by localized, roughly spherical patterns (masses). ## III. Foundational Structures and Principles The hypothesis posits gravity as a fundamental principle governing pattern formation, potentially linked to information, contextuality, and conservation. To explore its viability, it is useful to examine foundational frameworks that deal with discrete structures, fundamental principles of transformation, relational physics, and conservation laws. ### A. Causal Set Theory (CST): Discrete Spacetime from Causal Order Causal Set Theory (CST) offers a specific approach to quantum gravity based on two fundamental axioms: (1) spacetime is fundamentally discrete, composed of elements ("spacetime atoms"), and (2) the structure relating these elements is a partial order (≺) representing the causal relationship (x precedes y if x can causally influence y) A crucial third axiom is (3) local finiteness: the number of elements causally between any two related elements is finite, ensuring discreteness This framework inherently respects causality and aims to be Lorentz invariant, as the discrete structure is not an embedded lattice in a background but the fundamental reality itself Continuum spacetime is expected to emerge as an approximation. The correspondence is established via "sprinkling": randomly distributing points into a Lorentzian manifold (M,g) according to a Poisson process at a fundamental density ρ (presumably Planckian). The causal relations between sprinkled points define the causal set, and the manifold is then "forgotten" In this approximation, the number of elements in a region corresponds, on average, to the spacetime volume of that region (N≈ρV) Recovering other continuum properties like dimension and topology from the causal set structure is an active area of research A major challenge is recovering locality. In a sprinkled causal set, each element typically has infinitely many direct causal predecessors and successors, making the notion of "neighbor" problematic However, progress has been made in defining effective local operators. Notably, a discrete analogue of the d'Alembertian operator (□) has been constructed This operator involves a specific weighted sum over elements in the causal past and future (within finite intervals), and its expectation value in a sprinkling of d-dimensional Minkowski space converges to the continuum □ϕ−21​Rϕ (where R is the Ricci scalar, vanishing in flat space) in the appropriate limit This provides a notion of emergent locality and dynamics for fields on a causal set Another significant hurdle is the "problem of non-manifoldlike sets" The vast majority of mathematically possible causal sets bear no resemblance to smooth manifolds; many consist of only two complex layers For CST to be viable, these must be dynamically suppressed. Recent work using path integral approaches with actions based on the discrete d'Alembertian (the Benincasa-Dowker-Glaser action) suggests that these non-manifoldlike configurations are indeed exponentially suppressed, potentially leaving manifoldlike causal sets as the dominant contribution CST provides a concrete framework for the "sequences of events" and discrete structure potentially underlying the hypothesis. Its focus on causality aligns with the hypothesis's constraints. However, the difficulties in recovering locality and the dominance of non-manifoldlike sets highlight the profound challenge of bridging a fundamentally discrete, acausal structure to the smooth, local physics of GR. If the hypothesis relies on such a discrete layer, the "pattern-forming principle" itself must act as a powerful selection mechanism, favoring the emergence of smooth, manifoldlike structures with local dynamics, much like the proposed CST actions aim to do ### B. Constructor Theory: Physics as Transformations Constructor theory, developed by David Deutsch and Chiara Marletto, offers a radically different framework for fundamental physics Instead of focusing on initial states and laws of motion predicting future states, it aims to express all physical laws in terms of which physical transformations, or tasks, are possible versus which are impossible, and why A task specifies input-output pairs of attributes for physical systems A task is possible (A✓) if a constructor – a physical entity capable of performing the task repeatedly while retaining the ability to do so – can, in principle, be built Otherwise, the task is impossible (A✘) Examples of constructors include heat engines, catalysts, or universal computers This framework seeks to provide a deeper level of explanation, underpinning existing dynamical theories by stating the principles that constrain which dynamics are possible. Information plays a central role, viewed not as an abstract mathematical concept but as something physical whose properties are determined by the laws of physics governing possible/impossible tasks For instance, an information medium is defined as a substrate where certain permutations of attributes (computations) are possible tasks, and attributes can be copied (distinguished and replicated) The distinct properties of quantum information (e.g., no-cloning) emerge from specific tasks being impossible for "superinformation media" Constructor theory's focus on principles governing transformations makes it a potentially suitable language for formalizing the hypothesis. The vague notion of a "principle driving pattern formation" could potentially be translated into precise statements about the possibility or impossibility of specific tasks. For example, one might conjecture: "Tasks corresponding to the formation and persistence of stable, aggregated patterns (e.g., increasing local information density or complexity) are possible, while tasks corresponding to their spontaneous, uncaused dissolution into homogeneity are impossible." Gravity, in this view, wouldn't be a force or curvature, but a manifestation of these fundamental constraints on constructible transformations related to structure and information. This approach could provide a rigorous, non-dynamical foundation for the hypothesis, shifting the focus from how patterns evolve to which evolutionary pathways are permitted by principle. ### C. Relationality and Contextuality: Insights from Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) The hypothesis emphasizes contextuality and relationality – the idea that pattern formation/stability depends on the surrounding configuration. Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM), primarily developed by Carlo Rovelli, provides a framework where such relational aspects are fundamental RQM asserts that the quantum state of a system S is not an intrinsic property of S, but rather describes the relation between S and some observing system O Different observers can have different, yet equally valid, descriptions of the same system based on their interactions with it Properties are realized only through interaction; there is no meaning to an absolute, observer-independent state of the universe RQM draws inspiration from relativity, where measurements depend on the observer's reference frame It aims to resolve quantum paradoxes like the measurement problem by denying the existence of a single, universal wavefunction that collapses Instead, "measurement" is simply an interaction where one system gains information about another, establishing correlations relative to that interaction This perspective is argued to be particularly suitable for quantum cosmology, avoiding the awkwardness of an external observer collapsing the wavefunction of the entire universe RQM directly supports the relational and contextual aspects of the hypothesis. If physical properties are fundamentally relational, arising only through interaction and comparison, then any principle governing the formation of patterns (structures with properties) must inherently be contextual. The stability or probability of a pattern at X would naturally depend on its relation to patterns at Y, as perceived by some (physical) reference system. This provides a conceptual underpinning for the long-range dependencies required by the hypothesis, framing them not as mysterious influences but as consequences of a fundamentally relational reality. ### D. Conservation Laws and Symmetries Conservation laws (energy, momentum, angular momentum, charge) are cornerstones of physics, reflecting fundamental symmetries of nature (via Noether's theorem in classical field theory). They profoundly constrain the dynamics of any physical system, including processes of pattern formation. The hypothesis suggests a link between gravity and the tendency of conserved quantities (like an energy analogue) to concentrate [User Query]. Several lines of thought connect gravity and conservation laws: - Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation relies crucially on the flux of boost energy (related to the stress-energy tensor Tμν​) across local horizons The EFE themselves ensure local conservation of stress-energy (∇μ​Tμν=0) via the Bianchi identities - Discussions around emergent gravity often grapple with how energy and momentum are conserved in theories where spacetime itself is emergent Some quantum-classical interaction frameworks suggest that conservation laws place strong constraints on how classical gravity can interact with quantum matter, potentially implying gravity must be quantum if it is to exchange energy/momentum with quantum systems - Alternative formulations like trace-free Einstein gravity modify the EFE (R⟨μν⟩​=κT⟨μν⟩​) such that the cosmological constant/vacuum energy does not directly gravitate. In these theories, energy-momentum conservation must be imposed as a separate condition, decoupling it partially from the gravitational dynamics - In some emergent spacetime models, the geometry itself arises from underlying quantum matter dynamics, and fundamental symmetries/conservation laws of the matter system dictate the properties of the emergent spacetime and gravity Any principle driving pattern formation must operate within the strict constraints imposed by known conservation laws. If the hypothesis posits gravity as such a principle, it must explain how this principle respects energy-momentum conservation. Perhaps the principle itself is a deeper expression of a conservation law related to information or complexity, or maybe it governs the flow and concentration of conserved quantities like energy, leading to stable patterns (mass concentrations) as its natural outcome. ### E. Mach's Principle: Inertia, Relations, and the Universe Mach's principle, though vaguely defined, broadly asserts that the inertia of a body arises not as an intrinsic property but from its relation to the distribution of all other matter in the universe Einstein was initially inspired by this idea, hoping GR would fully embody it, but later became skeptical as GR admits solutions (like Minkowski space or Gödel's rotating universe) that seem non-Machian – possessing inertia without sufficient matter sources or allowing rotation relative to empty space The debate continues on whether GR is Machian. Some argue that frame-dragging effects (like Lense-Thirring precession inside a rotating shell) 60 or the role of boundary conditions in solving the EFE constraint equations capture the spirit of Mach's principle Others propose modifications to GR or alternative theories to better incorporate Machian ideas, such as Brans-Dicke theory which introduces a scalar field ϕ mediating inertial effects from distant matter Modern interpretations often link Mach's principle to relational physics and emergent gravity. Barbour's relational mechanics attempts to formulate dynamics purely in terms of relative configurations, eliminating absolute space and time In some emergent gravity scenarios, like Pretko's fracton gravity, inertia is not fundamental but arises for a fracton excitation only due to the presence of a background distribution of other fractons, providing a concrete realization of Mach's principle Mach's principle resonates strongly with the hypothesis's emphasis on relationality and contextuality. It directly proposes that a local property (inertia) is determined by the global context (distribution of mass). If gravity is the principle governing pattern formation, and inertia is a property of these patterns, then a Machian perspective suggests this principle must be sensitive to the large-scale structure of the universe. Exploring Machian frameworks might offer insights into the mechanism by which the presence of distant patterns influences local pattern formation probabilities, as required by the hypothesis. The convergence of relational ideas from RQM and Mach's principle strengthens the case that a relational viewpoint might be crucial for understanding gravity's origins, potentially explaining its long-range nature as an inherent consequence of properties being defined by global context. ## IV. Pattern Formation, Complexity, and Aggregation Dynamics The hypothesis proposes gravity as a principle driving pattern formation and persistence, particularly favoring aggregation. To assess this, it is instructive to examine concepts and models from complexity science, statistical mechanics, and physics where structure emerges from underlying rules. ### A. Principles of Self-Organization and Emergence Complex systems science studies how interactions between numerous components can lead to collective behaviors and structures not present in the individual components Key concepts include: - Self-Organization: The spontaneous emergence of global patterns or coordinated behavior from local interactions among components, without external control or a central blueprint Examples range from flocking birds and insect colonies 69 to crystal formation and chemical oscillations - Emergence: The appearance of properties or phenomena at a macroscopic level that cannot be straightforwardly reduced to or predicted from the properties of the microscopic constituents alone Language emerging from characters 74 or consciousness from neurons are often cited examples. Emergence often involves the generation of novel information not present in initial or boundary conditions These concepts provide the essential language for the hypothesis. If gravity is a principle of pattern formation, it acts as the underlying rule facilitating the self-organization of fundamental constituents (events, information bits, quantum fields) into stable, emergent structures (particles, objects, galaxies). Complexity science suggests that relatively simple local rules can indeed generate rich macroscopic structure The hypothesis posits that gravity is (part of) that rule set. There can be a dynamic interplay: emergence often creates new information or levels of organization, while self-organization can involve a reduction of local entropy or possibilities to achieve the ordered pattern ### B. Statistical Mechanics of Long-Range Order from Local Rules Statistical mechanics provides the mathematical tools to connect microscopic laws governing individual components to the macroscopic behavior of the collective system It explains how phenomena like phase transitions and the emergence of long-range order (e.g., magnetization in a ferromagnet below the Curie temperature) can arise from short-range interactions between microscopic constituents Key insights relevant to the hypothesis include: - Criticality: Near critical points (phase transitions), systems often exhibit scale invariance and long-range correlations, even if the underlying interactions are local. Small perturbations can have large effects (diverging susceptibility) - Universality: The macroscopic behavior near criticality often falls into universality classes, depending only on general features like dimensionality and symmetry, not on microscopic details - Information and Entropy: Thermodynamic concepts like entropy and free energy minimization govern equilibrium states. Information theory is increasingly used to characterize complexity and correlations in these systems, sometimes defining emergence via informational criteria (e.g., when system complexity exceeds encoding capacity of local interactions) This framework is directly applicable to the hypothesis. If gravity acts as a local principle biasing event sequences or interactions, statistical mechanics could describe how this bias leads to the emergence of large-scale correlations and aggregated patterns, akin to a phase transition from a homogeneous state to a structured one. Cosmological structure formation could potentially be modeled as such a process, where the "gravitational principle" drives the system towards a state with long-range order (clumping). The challenge lies in identifying the specific local rule (the principle) and showing it leads to the observed cosmic structures. ### C. Physical Mechanisms of Aggregation and Patterning Several physical and biological systems exhibit pattern formation driven by local rules or interactions, offering potential analogies for the proposed gravitational mechanism: - Scale-Dependent Feedbacks (Turing Patterns): Many regular patterns (stripes, spots) in chemical reactions or biological systems are explained by activator-inhibitor dynamics: a short-range positive feedback (activation) coupled with a long-range negative feedback (inhibition) While this produces patterns, the mechanism relies on opposing interactions at different scales, which might differ from the purely aggregative bias suggested by the hypothesis. - Density-Dependent Aggregation (Phase Separation): In some systems, aggregation occurs because the movement rate of individuals depends non-monotonically on local density. For example, organisms might slow down or stop moving at intermediate densities, leading to a net influx into denser regions and spontaneous clumping This process, mathematically analogous to Cahn-Hilliard dynamics describing phase separation in physics 81, results in irregular, patchy patterns driven purely by local movement rules influenced by density. This appears as a particularly strong analogy for the hypothesis, where the presence of a pattern (high density) modifies local rules (movement/event probability) to favor further aggregation, without requiring an explicit long-range attractive force. - Chemotaxis and Active Matter: Self-propelled entities (like bacteria or colloids) can aggregate and form complex dynamic patterns by responding to chemical gradients they collectively create (chemotaxis) or through collisions and alignment interactions Here, aggregation emerges from the interplay of individual movement, sensing, and interaction rules These examples demonstrate that aggregation and pattern formation can indeed arise from local rules and biases, lending plausibility to the hypothesis's core idea. The density-dependent aggregation mechanism 80, where pattern presence influences local dynamics to enhance aggregation, seems especially relevant as a potential model for how gravity, viewed as a principle, might operate. ### D. Fractons and Emergent Gravity A fascinating recent development in condensed matter physics involves fracton phases of matter These phases exhibit quasiparticle excitations (fractons) with restricted mobility: they might be completely immobile or only able to move along specific lines or planes within the material This restricted mobility arises from unconventional conservation laws, such as the conservation of dipole moment (or higher multipole moments) in addition to charge conservation Fracton phases are often described by symmetric tensor gauge theories, analogous to how electromagnetism is described by a vector (U(1)) gauge theory Michael Pretko and collaborators have shown that certain tensor gauge theories naturally lead to phenomena reminiscent of gravity 66: - Emergent Gravitons: The tensor gauge fields can behave like a spatial metric, and fluctuations can include massless spin-2 modes analogous to gravitons - Gravitational Force: An effective attractive force between fractons arises from the conservation laws and locality. While typically short-range, it can exhibit power-law behavior under certain conditions and can be described geometrically via a geodesic-like principle - Machian Inertia: An isolated fracton is immobile due to the conservation laws. However, in the presence of a background distribution of other fractons, an individual fracton acquires finite inertia, realizing Mach's principle where inertia emerges from interaction with the surrounding "matter" distribution - Connection to Elasticity: Some fracton models are dual to theories of elasticity, linking the restricted mobility of defects (like dislocations) to fractonic behavior Fracton gravity provides a concrete, albeit exotic, theoretical playground where gravity-like features emerge directly from underlying conservation principles that constrain how patterns (fracton excitations) can form and move. This strongly suggests that the "principle" sought by the hypothesis could potentially be identified with a novel conservation law or symmetry operating at a fundamental level, perhaps related to information or complexity measures. The fracton example shows that such principles can indeed lead to emergent metric-like fields and gravitational dynamics. The existence of physical mechanisms like density-dependent aggregation offers compelling analogies, demonstrating how aggregation can arise from local rules modified by pattern density, rather than fundamental forces This supports the conceptual plausibility of the hypothesis. Furthermore, the distinction between patterns formed by such aggregation dynamics versus those formed by scale-dependent feedbacks (like activation-inhibition) is significant The hypothesis, emphasizing aggregation, aligns more closely with the former. This could imply that cosmological structure formation, if driven by such a principle, might exhibit different dynamics, stability properties, or statistical signatures compared to the standard GR-based model, potentially offering observational tests ## V. Challenges, Cosmological Implications, and Future Directions While conceptually intriguing, the hypothesis that gravity is a principle driving pattern formation faces substantial challenges. Its potential success hinges on overcoming these hurdles, particularly in making contact with established physics and offering distinct cosmological predictions. ### A. The Grand Challenge: Recovering General Relativity's Formalism The foremost challenge is to derive the precise mathematical structure of General Relativity, specifically the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) and the concept of dynamic spacetime curvature, from the proposed abstract principle(s) GR's formalism is deeply rooted in differential geometry, the equivalence principle, and specific symmetries It is expressed through tensor equations relating the metric tensor gμν​ and its derivatives (via the Einstein tensor Gμν​) to the stress-energy tensor Tμν​ Deriving this specific, complex mathematical structure from principles based on information, pattern probabilities, contextuality, or discrete events is an immense task. It requires explaining why the effective macroscopic description takes the form of a pseudo-Riemannian manifold with curvature governed by second-order partial differential equations of a very specific tensor form. This goes far beyond qualitative arguments for emergence. Existing derivations of EFE from related concepts often start much closer to GR's structure. Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation assumes local Rindler horizons and the Unruh effect, concepts tied to spacetime geometry and acceleration Bianconi's entropic action involves variations of metrics String theory derivations yield EFE as consistency conditions for string propagation in a background spacetime, often coupled to other fields like the dilaton The hypothesis, starting from more abstract principles of pattern formation, faces a much larger conceptual and mathematical gap. Furthermore, even successfully recovering GR in some limit does not guarantee the correctness of the underlying principle. As argued in the context of spacetime functionalism, GR might be "multiply realizable" – different underlying micro-theories or principles could potentially lead to the same macroscopic effective theory Therefore, recovering GR is a necessary but not sufficient condition for validating the hypothesis. The failure to recover GR's specific mathematical structure represents not just a technical difficulty but a deep conceptual disconnect that must be bridged for the hypothesis to be considered a viable physical theory. ### B. Defining the Mechanism: Locality, Propagation, and the "Instruction" The hypothesis speaks of the presence of a pattern at location A influencing event probabilities or pattern stability at location B, biasing dynamics towards aggregation [User Query]. This necessitates a concrete physical mechanism explaining how this influence operates and propagates, respecting fundamental constraints: - Locality: The influence cannot be instantaneous action-at-a-distance. It must be mediated locally. - Finite Propagation Speed: The influence must propagate at a speed less than or equal to the speed of light, c. - Causality: The influence must respect the causal structure of spacetime. Several possibilities for such a mechanism could be explored, each with challenges: 1. Mediated Interaction: Is there an underlying field or excitation propagating the "bias"? If so, how does this differ from standard QG posits like the graviton? Is it a fundamentally different kind of entity related to information flow? 2. Propagation through Structure: Does the influence propagate through the connections of the underlying structure itself, perhaps a discrete causal network as in CST?17 How is information encoded and transmitted efficiently enough in such a network to produce macroscopic gravitational effects? 3. Holographic Propagation: Could the influence be understood via a holographic duality, where the interaction appears non-local in the bulk but is local in a dual boundary theory?18 This requires identifying the appropriate dual theory and demonstrating the correspondence. 4. Relational Propagation: Is the influence an inherent consequence of the relational nature of reality, as suggested by RQM?13 How does a change in relation at A propagate to affect relations involving B? Operationalizing this requires a dynamic theory of relations. Currently, the hypothesis lacks a specific, predictive mechanism. Moving beyond the conceptual "bias" or "instruction" to a quantifiable process respecting locality and causality is crucial. This highlights a potential tension: if the principle is fundamentally global or relational (sensitive to the overall pattern context, as in Machian ideas 60), how does it manifest locally and propagate causally? Bridging this gap between a potentially global principle and its required local manifestation is a key unresolved issue. ### C. Cosmological Relevance A successful fundamental theory should ideally shed light on cosmology. The hypothesis offers potential insights but also faces questions: - Structure Formation: A potential strength is providing an inherent reason for matter to clump, rather than relying solely on initial density fluctuations amplified by GR's attraction [User Query]. If gravity is the principle driving aggregation, structure formation might be a more direct consequence of the fundamental laws. However, this needs to be quantified. Would this lead to different predictions for the cosmic microwave background anisotropies, the large-scale structure power spectrum, galaxy clustering, or halo mass functions compared to the standard $\Lambda$CDM model based on GR? If the dynamics resemble aggregation/phase separation models 80, the resulting structures might have different statistical properties or formation histories. This could be the most promising avenue for empirical distinction. - Dark Energy/Repulsion: The hypothesis, as initially framed, focuses on aggregation (attraction). Explaining the observed accelerated expansion of the universe (attributed to dark energy, often modeled as a cosmological constant Λ 1) presents a challenge. Can a principle favoring aggregation also accommodate repulsion? - Perhaps the principle is more nuanced, and specific types of patterns (e.g., the vacuum state, highly disordered states) lead to repulsive effects. - It might connect to thermodynamic ideas where volume-dependent entropy terms contribute positively to pressure, driving expansion, as explored in some entropic gravity models aiming to explain MOND/dark phenomena - It could potentially lead to an emergent cosmological constant, similar to Bianconi's quantum relative entropy approach - Alternatively, the principle might only describe attractive gravity, requiring a separate explanation for cosmic acceleration. Addressing these cosmological questions is vital for the hypothesis's credibility. ### D. Comparative Assessment: Strengths and Weaknesses Based on the analysis, we can summarize the conceptual strengths and weaknesses: Strengths: - Unification Potential: Offers a path to integrate gravity with fundamental principles governing matter, information, and complexity, potentially dissolving the matter-gravity dichotomy [User Query]. - Explanation of Aggregation: Provides a potentially more fundamental reason for why matter clumps and structures form, beyond just an attractive force acting on pre-existing mass [User Query]. - Conceptual Alignment: Fits within contemporary trends exploring emergent spacetime, the role of information in physics (thermodynamic, quantum), and relational perspectives Weaknesses: - Recovering GR: The primary obstacle is deriving the precise mathematical formalism of GR (EFE, spacetime curvature) from the abstract principle - Mechanism Definition: Lack of a concrete, predictive physical mechanism explaining how the principle operates locally and propagates causally [User Query]. - Specificity: The "principle" itself remains vaguely defined and requires rigorous mathematical formulation, possibly via frameworks like Constructor Theory - Testability: Absence of clear, unique, and testable predictions that distinguish it from GR or standard QG approaches. Potential lies in distinct cosmological structure formation signatures. ### E. Table: Comparative Overview of Gravity Theories To clarify the hypothesis's position, the following table compares it with other major frameworks: | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---| |Feature|General Relativity (GR)|Quantum Gravity (QG - Strings/LQG)|Emergent/Info-Gravity (e.g., Thermo/Entropic/QI)|Hypothesis: Gravity as Pattern Principle| |Nature of Gravity|Spacetime Geometry 1|Fundamental Force (Quantized Field/Geometry) 3|Emergent Phenomenon (Statistical/Informational) 7|Fundamental Principle of Pattern Formation [User Query]| |Fundamental Entities|Spacetime Metric (gμν​), Matter Fields (Tμν​) 1|Strings, Loops, Gravitons, Spacetime Foam 4|Underlying Microstates, Information Bits, Entanglement 6|Events, Information, Relations, Patterns [User Query]| |Role of Gravity|Responds to Matter/Energy 2|Mediates Interaction 3|Arises from Collective Behavior/Info Content 20|Drives/Governs Pattern Formation & Persistence [User Query]| |Locality|Manifest (Field Equations) 1|Assumed/Emergent (Depends on Approach) 41|Often Assumed/Derived (e.g., Local Horizons) 20|Required Constraint, Mechanism Unclear [User Query]| |Key Equations|Einstein Field Equations (EFE) 1|(Effective) EFE + Quantum Corrections / Underlying Eqns.|(Effective) EFE derived from Thermo/Info Principles 20|Unknown; Must yield EFE in limit| |Core Concept|Equivalence Principle, Curvature 88|Quantization, Unification 4|Entropy, Information, Holography 8|Pattern Stability, Aggregation Bias, Contextuality [User Query]| |Primary Challenge|Quantum Incompatibility 4|Mathematical Consistency, Testability 21|Recovering GR Details, Quantum Coherence 35|Recovering GR Formalism, Defining Mechanism| |Unification Approach|Geometric Unification (failed)|Unifying Forces via Quantization 4|Gravity from Matter/Info Properties 23|Gravity as Principle Underlying Matter/Patterns [User Query]| This table highlights the distinct conceptual niche occupied by the hypothesis. ## VI. Conclusion ### A. Summary Assessment The hypothesis that gravity is a manifestation of fundamental principles driving pattern formation and persistence offers a conceptually stimulating, albeit highly speculative, reframing of one of physics' deepest mysteries. It aligns with powerful trends in theoretical physics emphasizing emergence, information, and relational structures. By proposing gravity as the active principle governing why stable, aggregated patterns form, rather than merely how they interact, it holds the potential for a deeper unification of matter, information, and spacetime dynamics. Analogies from complexity science, particularly density-dependent aggregation, and concrete theoretical models like fracton gravity lend plausibility to the core idea that gravity-like effects can emerge from underlying rules constraining pattern behavior. However, the hypothesis faces formidable challenges that currently prevent it from being considered a complete physical theory. The gap between the abstract "principle" and the precise, geometric formalism of General Relativity remains vast. Deriving the Einstein Field Equations, with their specific tensor structure and description of dynamic spacetime curvature, from concepts related to information, contextuality, or pattern probabilities is an unsolved and potentially insurmountable obstacle. Furthermore, the lack of a concrete, predictive mechanism explaining how this principle operates locally and propagates causally leaves the hypothesis conceptually incomplete. ### B. Recap of Key Strengths and Obstacles - Strengths: The primary appeal lies in its potential to unify gravity with the principles governing the existence of matter itself, offering a potentially more fundamental explanation for aggregation and structure formation than standard models. It resonates with modern ideas about information as a physical constituent and the relational nature of reality. - Obstacles: The overwhelming challenge is the recovery of GR's detailed mathematical structure. Without this, the hypothesis cannot make quantitative contact with the vast body of observational evidence supporting GR. Defining a specific, local, and causal mechanism for the proposed influence is the second major hurdle. The principle itself needs precise mathematical articulation, moving beyond conceptual analogy. Finally, generating unique, testable predictions remains elusive, though distinct signatures in cosmological structure formation offer a potential avenue. ### C. Outlook Future progress requires translating the abstract concepts into a rigorous mathematical framework. Several avenues appear potentially fruitful: - Constructor Theory: This framework, built on principles of possible versus impossible transformations, seems particularly well-suited to formalize the hypothesis Defining gravity through constraints on tasks related to pattern formation and information processing could provide the needed precision. - Causal Set Theory: If the underlying reality is discrete and causal, CST provides the tools The challenge would be to show how the proposed pattern-forming principle acts within the CST path integral to dynamically select manifoldlike causal sets exhibiting GR-like behavior - Information Geometry and Complexity: Tools relating quantum information measures (entropy, complexity) to geometry, especially in holographic contexts, might provide quantitative links between pattern properties and emergent spacetime - Generalized Conservation Laws: Inspired by fracton models 66, identifying novel conservation laws related to information or pattern structure could be a path towards deriving emergent gravitational dynamics. Observationally, the most promising direction lies in cosmology. If the principle drives structure formation via dynamics different from GR (e.g., akin to phase separation 80), it might leave subtle imprints on the statistical properties of large-scale structure or the evolution of cosmic voids and filaments. Distinguishing such signatures from uncertainties in baryonic physics or modified gravity models would be extremely challenging but offers a potential empirical foothold. In conclusion, viewing gravity as a principle of pattern formation is a radical departure from conventional thinking. While currently lacking mathematical rigor and a clear mechanism, its conceptual appeal and alignment with foundational trends warrant further theoretical exploration. Addressing the profound challenges, particularly the recovery of GR, will determine whether this perspective can mature from an intriguing hypothesis into a predictive physical theory. Regardless of its ultimate success, exploring such fundamental questions about the interplay of gravity, information, and structure is essential for advancing our understanding of the universe. #### Works cited 1. Einstein field equations - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723743246%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0CPliZP9q2Jtz1M5TZcLbD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723857667&usg=AOvVaw0HjmvPdn6Vn50z_WvyE5aP) 2. How to understand Einstein's equation for general relativity - Big Think, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/einstein-general-theory-relativity-equation/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/einstein-general-theory-relativity-equation/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723743826%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1UEFEehZuaTgRg5aAn1VX9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723857933&usg=AOvVaw28UgXPyqmYVjGCbLlPcKHG) 3. general relativity - How does the philosophy of 'Emergent Gravity ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/553104/how-does-the-philosophy-of-emergent-gravity-differ-from-that-of-quantum-gravi](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/553104/how-does-the-philosophy-of-emergent-gravity-differ-from-that-of-quantum-gravi%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723744736%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2LAiBGKDSjhSuptBcFCBh8&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858052&usg=AOvVaw3hioGA9WC9TL5dNth8GLwc) 4. Quantum Gravity - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quantum-gravity/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quantum-gravity/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723745337%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Ne54jAEgcXFLcObLD43wm&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858136&usg=AOvVaw0zvJKewiLAhKO_ppQCX0kp) 5. Unifying Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity: A Significant Application of Semi-Structured Complex Numbers - Preprints.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202310.1253/v2/download](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202310.1253/v2/download%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723746135%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LyzFY4Bdj4kmgjaNckw4P&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858216&usg=AOvVaw3R7dt6Vvl9lS3GZRTsr1VO) 6. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723746516%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1YobPA5a4K0cZHZn8Mfcl1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858342&usg=AOvVaw09UuZmHGY_ZbKbON64T2El) 7. Entropic gravity - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723746995%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3iG7jMxYxE3FE4P5CRsa2g&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858407&usg=AOvVaw1n3sAPoFMUwCSKPGjdf30j) 8. Holographic principle - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723747549%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ot_EARhL_0l-bf13nsLma&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858474&usg=AOvVaw0I5BCP7GAFdBSQan971uh5) 9. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0203101](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0203101%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723747951%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Zpb8gcxJYvSA4MFA9oN8A&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858552&usg=AOvVaw0qaIDdqwAACyuBF-ejOHjX) 10. (PDF) Constructor Theory of Information - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262988240_Constructor_Theory_of_Information](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/262988240_Constructor_Theory_of_Information%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723748650%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3_dtzmkeGUVYbp1SuGLYjv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858629&usg=AOvVaw2mMthiGuPvbkXkuf5y-qRV) 11. Constructor theory of information | Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences - Journals, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723749531%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Wnuc0aHk1mxZHIpNXATwF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858718&usg=AOvVaw19nUVox6DW-1X-2fFVu9qh) 12. arXiv:1508.05543v1 [physics.hist-ph] 22 Aug 2015 - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20177/1/1508.05543.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20177/1/1508.05543.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723750227%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1ku5dFXuM-ebOGfvUINzJp&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858788&usg=AOvVaw290ovBSBNyB2iF-uteeSzV) 13. Relational quantum mechanics - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_quantum_mechanics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_quantum_mechanics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723750786%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw20Q8tnVbqqx15BJReKX5Si&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858857&usg=AOvVaw2OthYP0J4nR2VLYAl1AzIe) 14. Conservation Laws Reveal the Quantumness of Gravity - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2311.08971v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2311.08971v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723751324%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2PouDFeAErp9yxR6KTvcjj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723858939&usg=AOvVaw2amZaOSEH66Rvg6v9bcKNE) 15. Foundational Issues Relating Spacetime, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics - Inspire HEP, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/files/eacae768527452817fff8ea419f65a3d](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/files/eacae768527452817fff8ea419f65a3d%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723752049%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw12hIaPTvEIDD_Bf33FDocw&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859051&usg=AOvVaw2CpNn1xYplWL18M5muFvLu) 16. arXiv:2412.14036v3 [math.CO] 19 Mar 2025, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.14036](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.14036%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723752539%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw19nn59mtaQ0hSFzkOeO0YD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859119&usg=AOvVaw2oZEmI7xNRX_nvISYMS_vE) 17. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0601121](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0601121%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723752937%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0VJHjFAm3LKJk6OdysFRsj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859182&usg=AOvVaw03RZOQSOY65RePAWgLxgUa) 18. AdS/CFT Correspondence - beuke.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://beuke.org/ads-cft/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://beuke.org/ads-cft/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723753372%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0FKQmfG_Wt5PdBvjsKmmo4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859247&usg=AOvVaw0bxJsWvuYrZV1EnJ6-CATf) 19. Information propagation in a non-local model with emergent locality - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357046530_Information_propagation_in_a_non-local_model_with_emergent_locality](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/357046530_Information_propagation_in_a_non-local_model_with_emergent_locality%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723754329%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2OpXSDG0sK3berfR7k4xsk&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859319&usg=AOvVaw2YTMiV-rX1UQ9wuktfDHjw) 20. Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9504004](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9504004%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723754874%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0oaQHDYQYhgHd-owu9SFba&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859419&usg=AOvVaw3QWVknGIIKR1JQyRKT58Ek) 21. A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity? | Phys. Rev. X - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041040](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041040%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723755571%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3clXyDCFN_7BYgBTNJxM1P&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859520&usg=AOvVaw3ho-FdeWwmTg0ghhmTAx21) 22. What is Entropic gravity, also known as emergent gravity? | ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/post/what_is_Entropic_gravity_also_known_as_emergent_gravity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/post/what_is_Entropic_gravity_also_known_as_emergent_gravity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723756376%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0hKlSeCZmCPJAulOXelEvd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859638&usg=AOvVaw3BhQglbO3aZskI7BfNn1gq) 23. Gravity from entropy: New theory bridging quantum mechanics and ..., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.firstprinciples.org/article/gravity-from-entropy-new-theory-bridging-quantum-mechanics-and-relativity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.firstprinciples.org/article/gravity-from-entropy-new-theory-bridging-quantum-mechanics-and-relativity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723757015%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw31L09o5JejVvSbC0KJzdFr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859741&usg=AOvVaw0LlQktjK9gVEG384FxSTYh) 24. On the emergence of gravity in a framework of emergent quantum mechanics - World Scientific Publishing, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S0219887824502451?download=true](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S0219887824502451?download%253Dtrue%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723757679%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VrzvgIVNgaXC4TI0vgzWS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859823&usg=AOvVaw1sWtHP0iJRVw8CjZbEFker) 25. [gr-qc/9504004] Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9504004](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9504004%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723758132%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2BHr9TQrxQd6DpDQYJkx43&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859896&usg=AOvVaw0wUIzAFmmQdaQak_2DurM9) 26. Emergent Gravitational Dynamics and Spacetime Geometry: A Unified Quantum-Relativistic Theory - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380792978_Emergent_Gravitational_Dynamics_and_Spacetime_Geometry_A_Unified_Quantum-Relativistic_Theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/380792978_Emergent_Gravitational_Dynamics_and_Spacetime_Geometry_A_Unified_Quantum-Relativistic_Theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723758805%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1AWyWN-3tvedEmndC6tUa8&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723859976&usg=AOvVaw0kJCJ0B6KTLfYMpWPMfr_D) 27. Entanglement Equilibrium and the Einstein Equation, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201101](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201101%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723759214%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0IBUvFc2mR9ydxe_lw621W&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860076&usg=AOvVaw3c1XxO-vWC0J7OY8i_y8AO) 28. Holographic principle - RYBN, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/IV.ALGORITHMS/QUANTUM_V/QUANTUM_PHYSICS/HOLOGRAPHIC_PRINCIPLE/Holographic_Principle.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/IV.ALGORITHMS/QUANTUM_V/QUANTUM_PHYSICS/HOLOGRAPHIC_PRINCIPLE/Holographic_Principle.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723759741%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1UAzVZ2GbIn9HLglPvalxu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860162&usg=AOvVaw0eraTyjVyZgeD9Fcw6si4H) 29. Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State | Phys. Rev. Lett., accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723760215%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3SSTE4HjNyxyOqu6TsOnLU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860266&usg=AOvVaw3_KxpriVEg9UF7YchZzIRt) 30. (PDF) Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics of Spacetime - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7173867_Nonequilibrium_Thermodynamics_of_Spacetime](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/7173867_Nonequilibrium_Thermodynamics_of_Spacetime%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723760903%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3SA2_RjPikrL0ttkQipC6V&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860347&usg=AOvVaw1uhAjENkTIU1gSeNYzBX2I) 31. 13 Spacetime thermodynamics and Einstein's equations - OIST Groups |, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://groups.oist.jp/system/files/Lecture_13.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://groups.oist.jp/system/files/Lecture_13.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723761292%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2paNQY6G3yulNWDl_YOS2Q&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860444&usg=AOvVaw39bgABwt91xQpjQ_15M1o3) 32. [1401.5262] Spacetime thermodynamics without hidden degrees of freedom - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5262](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5262%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723761685%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2dXsDfAuD1RKqe0_CsvGMS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860533&usg=AOvVaw3V8bX-_X1Q0TFg8bX5fJHQ) 33. Thermodynamics as a framework for understanding gravitational dynamics and quantum gravity - Inspire HEP, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/literature/2867772](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/literature/2867772%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723762203%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1T0JDFLb7uTaNBQ9EQBIS2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860626&usg=AOvVaw1fH0fPvrBs0il0wEtsKklY) 34. The thermodynamics of quantum spacetime histories arXiv:1510.03858v1 [gr-qc] 13 Oct 2015, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://dec1.sinp.msu.ru/~panov/Lib/Papers/QG/1510.03858v1.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://dec1.sinp.msu.ru/~panov/Lib/Papers/QG/1510.03858v1.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723762671%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2GEYBO8vsaReKslLWaOW_Y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860721&usg=AOvVaw2BmJJiStOd02_TX7u_AebR) 35. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.2668](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.2668%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723762930%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2wPZbZY2lpscwp2IkPtAnr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860803&usg=AOvVaw1F5neRIBybNLs4MVGqW8_-) 36. Is gravity an entropic force after all? - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/4289/is-gravity-an-entropic-force-after-all](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/4289/is-gravity-an-entropic-force-after-all%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723763425%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0jmasEdB-HRLgYwVGKagiO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860877&usg=AOvVaw1DuUlJUTi2XxY2O1VTfHEt) 37. AdS/CFT: Emerging Islands and Wormholes - Imperial College London, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/theoretical-physics/msc/dissertations/2022/Will-Chan-Dissertation.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/theoretical-physics/msc/dissertations/2022/Will-Chan-Dissertation.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723764107%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1cDm61MTT1p2n9XL7Sw2Z4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723860969&usg=AOvVaw3VBRlrrvSIl7TfUWTa1dwK) 38. The weak equivalence principle and the Dirac constant: a result from the holographic principle - Inspire HEP, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://inspirehep.net/legacy/arxiv/2501.07594](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://inspirehep.net/legacy/arxiv/2501.07594%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723764567%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3WE1sdMUWiIdA8sa_rxkue&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861055&usg=AOvVaw1Fd637NY_sCdCj8XQUOYBo) 39. arXiv:hep-th/0203101 v2 29 Jun 2002, accessed April 24, 2025, [http://old.phys.huji.ac.il/~barak_kol/Courses/Black-holes/reading-papers/Bousso.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://old.phys.huji.ac.il/~barak_kol/Courses/Black-holes/reading-papers/Bousso.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723764993%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1LkkBQV_qtgE_3oCe1xn3Y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861126&usg=AOvVaw2BVy_Ziwi5Im-_KmXpq8ou) 40. The AdS/CFT Correspondence arXiv:1501.00007v2 [gr-qc] 19 Feb 2015, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00007%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723765358%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0p2NRa6nBB71E6qup_EUrr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861210&usg=AOvVaw2wJygukoqg1-YsIaps_Sho) 41. AdS/CFT Duality and the Emergence of Spacetime - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9061/1/AdSFinal.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9061/1/AdSFinal.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723765723%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1gKTdEnb1U8LOOyuxShNlH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861281&usg=AOvVaw0RyRJroVLYrzTpkS6hO85z) 42. State-dressed local operators in the A d S / C F T correspondence - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086035](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086035%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723766158%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0YPJxn_xuOaz2TheFhE6HG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861377&usg=AOvVaw11HDjlLDscc5N3Tg3R1-Ip) 43. Spacetime-emergent ring toward tabletop quantum gravity experiments | Phys. Rev. Research - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023168](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023168%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723766789%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1s9egc9K-G65sJd8C2QQDH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861464&usg=AOvVaw2mE5HtwKwzqH5r22kNwJn-) 44. arXiv:2504.12919v1 [gr-qc] 17 Apr 2025, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.12919](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.12919%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723767110%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3aN3DrFsP8q3NyVMQQ9Ypy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861543&usg=AOvVaw3P1HmMNH10QY5G0jgnzEzN) 45. Causal Sets and an Emerging Continuum - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380820908_Causal_Sets_and_an_Emerging_Continuum](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/380820908_Causal_Sets_and_an_Emerging_Continuum%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723767560%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3iTa1jwo4YvsKawO7SGkud&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861613&usg=AOvVaw1WxcDu0sBljlJprt1nd_in) 46. Causal Sets and an Emerging Continuum - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.14059](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.14059%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723767866%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LSiHooDqUI-bYlAadMK6I&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861690&usg=AOvVaw3i36TWWxFgIkwlzVoyVkgk) 47. [1403.1622] Generalized Causal Set d'Alembertians - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1622](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1622%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723768180%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2xonrVAU8fHOYPojbqEA5Y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861757&usg=AOvVaw2LHmorjC3MpwiQfV_t3a-R) 48. [1305.2588] Causal set d'Alembertians for various dimensions - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2588](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2588%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723768506%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw30EAvCn3WHGWqE-Xo5ylk1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861843&usg=AOvVaw0PkcGyBU-sHYyg0XrzjudC) 49. Nonlocal Scalar Quantum Field Theory from Causal Sets - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.6513](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.6513%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723768841%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3UdL7WVdznMkBjPNqDnTVc&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861914&usg=AOvVaw1FEuLjdcGERmO4xJCBPlnc) 50. (PDF) Causal sets and an emerging continuum - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383119104_Causal_sets_and_an_emerging_continuum](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/383119104_Causal_sets_and_an_emerging_continuum%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723769382%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw04Am61gg_D2CpgLVcvcHmU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723861988&usg=AOvVaw1D6-04CkrRIpoLb5ypmvUW) 51. Constructor theory - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructor_theory](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructor_theory%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723769707%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1r30j5AuzV5CYTX1025c7-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862077&usg=AOvVaw39e1PBBxDXItivyOVefVrM) 52. arxiv.org, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.7439](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.7439%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723769953%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1yZYHj7PhNuYoeAAcFrj4h&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862142&usg=AOvVaw0LVdxAtrBvQSdppOoYQzX5) 53. Constructor theory of information | Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences - Journals, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723770490%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw26_412re5Ea4LtRHjn5HK3&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862216&usg=AOvVaw3nhiWnbJQNDia2cjv_6mW1) 54. Relational Quantum Cosmology (Chapter 15) - Cambridge University Press, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-of-cosmology/relational-quantum-cosmology/973DF168B551685740A79AD72E08050C](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-of-cosmology/relational-quantum-cosmology/973DF168B551685740A79AD72E08050C%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723771083%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1kyMmfK8Y8TGK9v-xbuFZj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862293&usg=AOvVaw3zH7DWcHt0sOQKPsIy8lUf) 55. 1 Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics, monism and quantum becoming1 ABSTRACT In this paper I present and defend Rovelli's r - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.0132](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.0132%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723771605%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2iHeC45advrrKqVl0J7Y56&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862373&usg=AOvVaw2Q8MbIJq7hHUvo3rdy5gVu) 56. Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review? - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.0740](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.0740%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723772059%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1uIOTQ_5oUyIIkDbdKpT4j&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862458&usg=AOvVaw0G8AQGZJoxebEuW66eDp0G) 57. Massless graviton in a model of quantum gravity with emergent spacetime | Phys. Rev. D, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024054](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024054%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723772494%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3CtiO9qXSC9XHG7Dqmrnoe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862540&usg=AOvVaw0u6d56VsTT3Bls5sE6C6Hw) 58. Machian Gravity: A mathematical formulation for Mach's Principle - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.04503](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.04503%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723773064%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2ucMERBZXCGDhAPEP1tabl&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862615&usg=AOvVaw26Y9hb-7MrsEyNRnbG-_6D) 59. On Mach's Principle in Entropic Gravity - MDPI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9321/4/2/11](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2673-9321/4/2/11%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723773389%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0J_KUoHcyH-MJGNzETzLNI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862681&usg=AOvVaw0XWPJvUq2FkYDADEQKrO4s) 60. Mach's principle - Wikipedia, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach%27s_principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach%252527s_principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723773795%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2OyRUP7oe9pKg5l1ZbfIm1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862748&usg=AOvVaw0rC5G-3-cdvAsF87SCzl6E) 61. Ernst Mach vs. Einstein - general relativity - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/462295/ernst-mach-vs-einstein](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/462295/ernst-mach-vs-einstein%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723774238%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2MIB6GrH3Sq8jvy7fn2IK6&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862823&usg=AOvVaw3B9ap72Yn-X7fylFa2h7KS) 62. (PDF) Mach's Principle in General Relativity - ResearchGate, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234215379_Mach's_Principle_in_General_Relativity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/234215379_Mach%26%2339;s_Principle_in_General_Relativity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723774770%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0uEV4NH8XK4eLSfJ6FdC9y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862895&usg=AOvVaw3L0Yrp_JVfbqMTwtvJ80V_) 63. 8.8: Mach's Principle Revisited - Physics LibreTexts, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Relativity/General_Relativity_(Crowell)/08%3A_Sources/8.08%3A_Mach's_Principle_Revisited](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Relativity/General_Relativity_\(Crowell\)/08%25253A_Sources/8.08%25253A_Mach%26%2339;s_Principle_Revisited%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723775387%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1EEpvjNwbBGJwleZhgr8iq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723862992&usg=AOvVaw234bOz318KnbXe4poz4Ldl) 64. Mach's Principle: A Response to Mashhoon and Wesson's Paper arXiv: 1106.6036, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51931026_Mach's_Principle_A_Response_to_Mashhoon_and_Wesson's_Paper_arXiv11066036](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/51931026_Mach%26%2339;s_Principle_A_Response_to_Mashhoon_and_Wesson%26%2339;s_Paper_arXiv11066036%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723776105%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2En0xet64PRgsq9kpSqQb1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863074&usg=AOvVaw2ioZH385EwBpJT6UWOWJ-h) 65. arXiv:1007.3368v1 [gr-qc] 20 Jul 2010, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3368](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3368%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723776477%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw38-4GVxlYxJB4Q8fadz9UH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863150&usg=AOvVaw20ZW81-1EGNOi-IflEnQ4g) 66. [1702.07613] Emergent Gravity of Fractons: Mach's Principle Revisited - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07613](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07613%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723776967%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2lLk3jmVKhhX4825AYOfRX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863221&usg=AOvVaw1-MIynC38n6pPlgKKtvVRv) 67. MIT Open Access Articles Emergent gravity of fractons: Mach's principle revisited, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/111579/PhysRevD.96.024051.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/111579/PhysRevD.96.024051.pdf?sequence%253D1%2526isAllowed%253Dy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723777660%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw29n23YyOykVu3558v6txOq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863293&usg=AOvVaw1ePHzacST166tn80HWAlh3) 68. Events: Emergence, (Self)Organization, and Complexity | Santa Fe Institute, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://santafe.edu/events/emergence-selforganization-and-complexity](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://santafe.edu/events/emergence-selforganization-and-complexity%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723778132%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3a-mX7qLCMU_dWm8NX2U36&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863369&usg=AOvVaw0_ddTBYUVTU7ZQXOYjKkYZ) 69. Guiding the Self-Organization of Cyber-Physical Systems - Frontiers, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2020.00041/full](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2020.00041/full%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723778610%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw15cY1oLQ8ZywSJHgurTiVN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863444&usg=AOvVaw3_cWIJmFuFb-SpLNeoYMxk) 70. Theoretical approaches to managing complexity in organizations: A comparative analysis | Estudios Gerenciales - Elsevier, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-estudios-gerenciales-354-articulo-theoretical-approaches-managing-complexity-in-S0123592314001843?redirectNew=true](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-estudios-gerenciales-354-articulo-theoretical-approaches-managing-complexity-in-S0123592314001843?redirectNew%253Dtrue%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723779374%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3WjFF4s09lJYM0InN8mAPI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863528&usg=AOvVaw34X9F5f4TZQw0-ScMTyfSN) 71. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium - Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gold/pdfs/teaching/cross_hohenberg.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gold/pdfs/teaching/cross_hohenberg.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723779911%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3pnS6jCWZzU30S3yf7xaIs&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863610&usg=AOvVaw0dIgFiw54Rsin0BqmUuIHV) 72. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium - MC Cross - Princeton University, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.princeton.edu/~wbialek/rome/refs/cross+hohenberg_93.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.princeton.edu/~wbialek/rome/refs/cross%252Bhohenberg_93.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723780400%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0VHw8R_AO6qHvd_BytOIAj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863684&usg=AOvVaw2wZ4wpEdsO1laEBfBhSSZM) 73. Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey of Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studies - MDPI, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/2/108](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/2/108%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723780916%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw34qqWkfidoeF7YUZkE-JLe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863759&usg=AOvVaw3TesnDRis5NMlG0J6fwZac) 74. From the origin of life to pandemics: emergent phenomena in complex systems | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2020.0410](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2020.0410%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723781769%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0xR2wNNZjM1GUC5_Xv44QT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863836&usg=AOvVaw015idUIobUTWmbXG-uj7u1) 75. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Systems for Pattern Identification, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.me.psu.edu/ray/journalAsokRay/2009/201GuptaRay09.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.me.psu.edu/ray/journalAsokRay/2009/201GuptaRay09.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723782289%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1BDIUudSLL_8d8XEdWfMad&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863909&usg=AOvVaw2YjdcMZPx26Sqyf3P0bbO1) 76. Metrics of Emergence, Self-Organization, and Complexity for EWOM Research - Frontiers, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00035/full](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00035/full%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723782804%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw17oN_9xyBEw1pgz-5EIzMB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723863992&usg=AOvVaw3aApiDZLT_bnfN6Xj0u1sT) 77. The Exploratory Study on the Relationship Between the Failure of Distance Metrics in High-Dimensional Space and Emergent Phenomena - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2504.08807v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2504.08807v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723783261%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3GYH1RAcQrfXRvfZto2xj2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864068&usg=AOvVaw2cUbEK_7V8P9rATDHaWR4o) 78. space and emergent phenomena - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.08807](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.08807%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723783562%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0MicyeFZsQZ8t2FO1DJg8N&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864133&usg=AOvVaw0RDsWPdHxmoVVg9pVxKIIK) 79. Mixed-State Long-Range Order and Criticality from Measurement and Feedback | PRX Quantum - Physical Review Link Manager, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030318](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030318%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723784048%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3H5CeHgm12sXTayCHKjPJ1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864205&usg=AOvVaw1a_q7exUjVvG4B8zBC5r9i) 80. Phase-separation physics underlies new theory for the resilience of patchy ecosystems, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926271/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926271/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723784666%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1kpVtzhaRm5_BMP75E2wZR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864275&usg=AOvVaw21LGeXKu1MFZilvRzBUvr5) 81. Phase separation explains a new class of self-organized spatial patterns in ecological systems | PNAS, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222339110](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222339110%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723785301%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw15oKdlXF5hWsZaFr2qPwWg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864363&usg=AOvVaw0t_BYEh7YoNFMsEEjJOMrp) 82. Formation, collective motion, and merging of macroscopic bacterial aggregates - PLOS, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009153](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id%253D10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009153%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723786344%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1pKK1qc618ZXnkva0qSXse&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864461&usg=AOvVaw3dgvjg8dC3TYAsYc6ajosh) 83. Heterogeneous individual motility biases group composition in a model of aggregating cells, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.1052309/full](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.1052309/full%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723787185%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1_KCLxDstnVU_UN96rv_3W&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864543&usg=AOvVaw1dPFPsbTel_qrRUmz4UsiX) 84. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics - Volume 16, 2025, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/conmatphys/16/1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/conmatphys/16/1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723787813%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lpmR0cxHa_AH1T6T3RU1h&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864618&usg=AOvVaw1VkcrVanWvbKUQ9hXPa5zm) 85. [1803.11196] Fractons - ar5iv - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1803.11196](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1803.11196%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723788310%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1ivxRbQrh7l4IT3LhYTmK-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864715&usg=AOvVaw2s-LzTweApguwUCwCvxZRc) 86. Quantum Liquids: Emergent higher-rank gauge theory and fractons - arXiv, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2403.17074v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2403.17074v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723788877%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw23BboSriOa71CqU_FSkc28&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864782&usg=AOvVaw3LstFoRpOq6aboHRaerYwI) 87. arXiv:1707.03838v3 [cond-mat.str-el] 27 Sep 2017, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.03838](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.03838%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723789324%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2VOOxb2BHzZHWm4LMvm-P2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864846&usg=AOvVaw1rEPw4Z0BFz7ZkWp1UgkMs) 88. 4. Gravitation - Lecture Notes on General Relativity - S. Carroll, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll4.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll4.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723790006%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Gb4xn175QbAEOFjikX-Z9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723864913&usg=AOvVaw23MNg9VX7mAFeQIOdikrL4) 89. DERIVING GENERAL RELATIVITY FROM STRING THEORY 1. Introduction The goal of this paper is to explain the significance of the conf - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11116/1/Huggett-Vistarini.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11116/1/Huggett-Vistarini.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723790830%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LrB5Ojy1UbTgriFPEKELT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723865143&usg=AOvVaw32KJUjh1u2pvCSAEYV9au2) 90. The multiple realizability of general relativity in quantum gravity - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 24, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16397/1/MR_GR_QG.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16397/1/MR_GR_QG.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1745452723791517%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1LnE-t2_iUGVnoXpjnRoBx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1745452723865221&usg=AOvVaw1UoD0i9f3LXIgoQe_3tAjE)