Fundamental Nature: East, West, Science # The Fabric of Reality: A Comparative Journey Through Eastern and Western Metaphysics, Cosmology, and Time ## Introduction: The Enduring Quest for Fundamental Reality: An East-West Comparative Journey Since the dawn of recorded history, humanity has embarked on an enduring quest to comprehend the fundamental nature of reality, the structure of the cosmos, and the enigmatic passage of time. This universal endeavor, manifesting in diverse cultural and intellectual forms, reflects a deep-seated need to understand our place within the grand tapestry of existence. From the evocative narratives of ancient creation myths to the intricate arguments of classical philosophy and the counter-intuitive revelations of modern science, this quest has unfolded across millennia, yielding a rich and varied landscape of thought. This report undertakes a comparative exploration of this landscape, tracing the evolution of metaphysical and cosmological ideas in both Eastern and Western traditions. Its objective is to illuminate the distinct pathways taken, the points of surprising convergence, and the potential for a deeper, more integrated understanding of the fundamental questions that continue to shape human inquiry. The scope of this investigation is necessarily vast, traversing historical epochs and cultural boundaries. It begins with the earliest recorded cosmologies of Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China, and Greece, examining how these foundational narratives shaped worldviews and conceptions of time. It then follows the emergence of formal philosophical inquiry, delving into the development of metaphysics in ancient Greece with figures like Plato and Aristotle, and exploring the foundational systems of major Eastern philosophies, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism. The report meticulously compares differing conceptualizations of reality—exploring notions of substance, essence, consciousness, emptiness, and principle—and critically examines the profound divergence between cyclical and linear views of time and their far-reaching implications. The journey continues through medieval and modern transformations in both East and West, charting the rise of Scholasticism, Renaissance humanism, the Enlightenment's rationalist-empiricist debates, Kant's critical turn, and the flourishing of Neo-Confucianism. Finally, the report assesses the transformative impact of 20th and 21st-century scientific theories—Einstein's Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Big Bang cosmology, cyclic universe models, and String Theory/Multiverse hypotheses—on these age-old philosophical questions. Throughout this exploration, a commitment to balanced comparison guides the analysis, drawing upon the methodologies of comparative philosophy 1 while remaining cognizant of the inherent challenges, such as the potential for descriptive chauvinism or the assumption of easy equivalences between distinct conceptual schemes.1 Central thematic threads weave through this historical narrative. The persistent tension between unity and multiplicity, permanence and change, forms one such thread, manifesting differently in the search for an underlying substance or principle versus the embrace of process and interdependence. The conceptualization of time—as a directed, purposeful line or an endlessly repeating wheel—emerges as a crucial differentiator, profoundly shaping cultural attitudes towards history, progress, suffering, and liberation. Causality, too, is examined through diverse lenses, from teleological explanations to systemic conditioning. Furthermore, the report tracks the dynamic, often complex interplay between mythological, philosophical, theological, and scientific modes of understanding, observing how these different ways of knowing have influenced, challenged, and sometimes converged with one another across history. By navigating these intricate historical and conceptual pathways, this report aims not merely to catalogue differences but to identify recurring questions, unexpected resonances, and potential avenues toward a more holistic, cross-cultural appreciation of humanity's shared quest to fathom the fabric of reality. ## I. Echoes of Creation: Ancient Cosmologies and the Nature of Time The earliest human attempts to understand the cosmos and their place within it were often articulated through myth. These ancient cosmologies, far from being mere primitive tales, provided foundational frameworks for entire worldviews, explaining the origins of the universe, the gods, humanity, and the nature of time itself. Examining these narratives from diverse cultures reveals both shared patterns and distinct trajectories in early metaphysical thought. ### A. Order from Chaos: Mesopotamian and Egyptian Visions In ancient Mesopotamia, the Enuma Elish stands as a pivotal creation epic. Likely composed in the 14th century BCE or earlier, it recounts the ascent of Marduk, the patron god of Babylon.3 The narrative begins with a universe conceived as undifferentiated watery chaos, where the primordial deities Tiamat (personifying the saltwater sea) and Apsu (the freshwater abyss) mingle.3 From their union, younger gods emerge, whose boisterous vitality disturbs their elders. Apsu’s plot to destroy them is thwarted by the cunning Ea, but Tiamat, enraged by Apsu's subsequent death, marshals monstrous forces for battle. It is Marduk, Ea’s son, who ultimately confronts and vanquishes Tiamat. In a graphic act of creation, he splits her corpse, using one half to form the heavens and the other the earth, subsequently organizing the cosmos, assigning roles to the gods, and creating humankind to serve them.3 This narrative structure—primordial chaos leading to divine conflict, culminating in the establishment of cosmic order and the creation of humanity—reflects a pattern common to many ancient Near Eastern cosmogonies, including those of Sumer and Ugarit, and shares similarities with the creation account in Genesis.3 The act of naming is also presented as integral to the creation process, with the heavens and earth only truly existing once named.6 The Enuma Elish served crucial functions within Babylonian society. Its recitation during the Akitu, the New Year festival held in spring, ritually reenacted the triumph of order over chaos, symbolically resetting the societal order for the coming year and celebrating the life-giving floods of the Tigris and Euphrates.3 The epic thus functioned not merely as an explanation of origins but as a powerful tool for social cohesion and political legitimization. By elevating Marduk to the lordship of the gods, the myth simultaneously established the divinely ordained supremacy of Babylon itself.3 Some scholars even suggest its primary purpose was not cosmology but the glorification of Marduk and the justification of Babylonian hegemony.6 Regardless of emphasis, the narrative powerfully links the structure of the cosmos to the structure of power on Earth. Ancient Egyptian cosmology, while diverse and evolving across different cult centers, similarly revolved around the concept of establishing and maintaining order against primordial chaos. Central to this worldview was the principle of Ma'at, encompassing truth, balance, order, justice, and cosmic harmony, often personified as a goddess.7 Ma'at represented the fixed, eternal order established at creation, essential for the cohesion of the world but constantly under threat from the forces of disorder.7 Egyptian cosmology depicted the earth (Geb) as a flat landmass arched over by the sky goddess Nut, separated by the air god Shu. Beneath the earth lay a parallel underworld, and beyond the sky stretched the infinite, primordial watery abyss of Nu, the chaos that existed before creation.7 Multiple creation myths offered different perspectives on how order emerged from Nu. The Heliopolitan tradition centered on Atum, who emerged from the waters on the primordial mound (the benben) and generated the first gods through self-creation.8 The Hermopolitan myth featured the Ogdoad, eight primordial deities representing the qualities of the pre-creation state (water, infinity, darkness, hiddenness), whose interaction produced the mound from which the sun arose.8 The Memphite theology attributed creation to the god Ptah, through the power of intellect and speech, highlighting a more abstract creative principle.8 The Theban tradition focused on Amun, often syncretized with the sun god Ra.8 Despite variations, these myths shared the theme of creation as the emergence of structure and life from undifferentiated potentiality, often symbolized by the primeval waters (Nu), the first mound (benben), and the lotus flower.8 Crucially, Egyptian thought integrated both linear and cyclical conceptions of time. The earliest mythic periods, the time of creation and the reign of the gods, were seen as linear.9 However, present time was understood as a series of recurring patterns that echoed the original creation and perpetually renewed Ma'at.7 The most vital cycles were the daily journey of the sun god Ra across the sky and through the underworld (symbolized by the scarab beetle, Khepri 8), battling the serpent of chaos Apep 8, and the annual inundation of the Nile, which renewed the land's fertility.8 These cycles were seen as fundamental to life and cosmic stability.7 The succession of pharaohs was also viewed through this lens, linking the earthly ruler to the divine order and the cycle of death and regeneration embodied by the Osiris myth.11 The function of these ancient Near Eastern cosmologies extended beyond mere explanation; the establishment of cosmic order by Marduk, for instance, directly mirrored and served to justify the political hegemony of Babylon.3 Similarly, the Egyptian concept of Ma'at inextricably linked cosmic balance with the societal duty to maintain it, thereby reinforcing the Pharaoh's central role in upholding both earthly and divine order.7 This demonstrates how cosmological narratives were often interwoven with, and supportive of, existing power structures and social norms, projecting societal needs onto the cosmos and reflecting them back as divine mandate. Furthermore, a recurring pattern emerges in these early cosmologies: the genesis of order from an undifferentiated, often chaotic, primordial state—typically represented as a watery abyss.3 This emergence frequently involves processes of separation (Marduk dividing Tiamat 3, Shu separating Geb and Nut 7), conflict (Marduk vs. Tiamat 3, Ra vs. Apep 8), or divine action like self-generation (Atum 8) or creation through thought and speech (Ptah 8). This widespread pattern across distinct cultures suggests a fundamental early human intuition that structured existence arises not ex nihilo, but through the differentiation, ordering, or overcoming of a pre-existing, often turbulent, potentiality. ### B. The Cosmic Dance in India: Cycles, Unity (Tadekam), and Rebirth (Samsara) Turning to the Indian subcontinent, the Vedas, ancient Sanskrit texts forming the bedrock of Hinduism, offer a distinct cosmological and metaphysical perspective.12 Central to early Vedic thought, particularly in hymns like the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rigveda, is the concept of Tadekam, meaning "That One".12 This refers to a singular, ultimate, indivisible reality that underlies the entire cosmos—an unmanifest source from which everything emanates and into which everything eventually dissolves.12 Tadekam transcends specific deities or material forms, representing an infinite, formless, eternal essence.12 This concept is closely related, and often equated, with the later, more elaborated notion of Brahman—the ultimate, impersonal reality that permeates and animates all existence.12 The Vedic worldview portrays this ultimate reality not as static, but as a dynamic, self-evolving force.12 Creation is depicted not as a singular act of a personal god, but as an ongoing, unfolding process wherein the One differentiates itself into the multiplicity of the cosmos.12 This dynamic unfolding occurs within a framework of vast, cyclical time. Hindu cosmology conceives of time not as a linear progression but as a series of immense, repeating cycles (kalpas), each composed of smaller ages (yugas).13 A single kalpa, considered a "day of Brahma," lasts 4.32 billion human years.14 Within these cycles, the universe undergoes perpetual phases of creation, preservation, and dissolution, overseen by the Trimurti: Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer/transformer).13 This cyclical pattern governs everything from the life of the cosmos to the existence of individual beings.12 Creation motifs include the emergence of the universe from the cosmic being (Purusha) or a cosmic egg (Hiranyagarbha).13 The universe itself is often described as multi-layered, potentially one of many parallel universes.13 Integral to this cyclical worldview is the doctrine of Samsara, the "wandering" or cycle of birth, death, and rebirth that characterizes the existence of all living beings.15 While the concept appears nascently in the Rigveda, it becomes fully developed in the post-Vedic Upanishads and later traditions.15 Samsara is driven by Karma, the universal principle of cause and effect, where actions (karma) performed in one life generate consequences that shape future experiences and rebirths.13 In the Hindu understanding, it is the Ātman—the individual Self, considered eternal and indestructible—that transmigrates through different bodies and life forms according to its accumulated karma.15 The ultimate goal of spiritual practice is Moksha, liberation from the potentially endless cycle of Samsara and the suffering inherent within it.12 This liberation is typically achieved through realizing the fundamental unity of the individual Self (Ātman) with the ultimate reality (Brahman/Tadekam).12 The Vedic philosophical orientation, therefore, emphasizes a deeply interconnected and dynamic reality. The ultimate unity (Tadekam/Brahman) is not a remote, static entity but an immanent, self-manifesting force whose nature is revealed through the endless cosmic cycles of creation, sustenance, and dissolution.12 This cosmic rhythm finds its microcosm in the journey of the individual Ātman through Samsara.15 This perspective, grounded in process and interconnectedness, offers a significant contrast to the more anthropomorphic, conflict-driven creation narratives prevalent in Mesopotamia. Furthermore, the sheer scale of Hindu cosmic time, with cycles spanning billions of years 14, inherently diminishes the ultimate significance of any single human lifespan or historical event. Existence is framed within an almost inconceivably vast process.15 This perspective fosters a different relationship with time, suffering, and the goals of existence compared to worldviews centered on linear, historically bounded narratives. The focus shifts towards understanding the nature of the cycle itself and seeking liberation (Moksha) from its repetitive turnings, rather than achieving salvation or purpose within a finite historical trajectory.12 ### C. Harmony and Flow in China: The Tao, Qi, and Natural Cycles Ancient Chinese thought, particularly Taoism, offers another distinct perspective on fundamental reality and time, emphasizing harmony, flow, and natural cycles. At the heart of Taoism lies the concept of the Tao (or Dao), literally "the Way" or "the Path".16 The Tao represents the ultimate principle, the natural order underlying the universe, the source from which all things arise and to which they return.16 It is often described as an ineffable, non-dualistic force—"eternally nameless" 17—that flows through all existence, maintaining balance and order.16 Unlike a personal creator god, the Tao is an impersonal principle, often compared to water for its yielding, adaptable, yet immensely powerful nature.17 Understanding and living in accordance with the Tao is the central aim of Taoist philosophy and practice.17 Complementing the Tao is the concept of Qi (or Ch'i), the vital life force or fundamental energy-matter that constitutes everything in the universe, from inanimate objects to living beings, emotions, and even ideas.16 Reality is thus seen as a dynamic field of constantly flowing and transforming Qi, organized by the underlying principles of the Tao.19 The dynamic interplay within this field is famously captured by the Yin-Yang symbol (Taijitu).16 This symbol depicts a circle divided into two swirling halves, one dark (Yin) and one light (Yang), each containing a dot of the opposite shade. It represents the fundamental Taoist principle that all phenomena are composed of opposing yet complementary forces: Yin associated with darkness, passivity, femininity, cold, and yielding; Yang with light, activity, masculinity, heat, and assertion.16 These forces are not static or mutually exclusive but exist in a perpetual state of flux, transforming into one another, creating a dynamic equilibrium that sustains the natural world.16 Harmony arises not from the victory of one force over the other, but from their balanced interaction.16 This emphasis on dynamic balance is reflected in the Taoist understanding of time, which is viewed not as linear progression but as cyclical and ever-flowing.16 This perspective mirrors the observable rhythms of nature: the alternation of day and night, the cycle of the seasons, the phases of the moon, and the processes of birth, growth, decay, and renewal.16 These natural cycles are embraced as the inherent pattern of the Tao, not seen as negative or threatening but as integral parts of the continuous flow of existence.16 Taoist wisdom involves aligning oneself with these rhythms through practices like Wu Wei—often translated as "non-action" or "effortless action," meaning acting in harmony with the natural flow rather than striving against it.18 Aging and death are accepted as natural phases of the cycle, not to be feared but understood as a return to the source.16 Some Taoist texts also conceptualize time emerging from a pre-existent, timeless state of undifferentiated wholeness or primal chaos (hundun), with the Tao itself being the timeless, all-pervading force governing the cyclical unfolding of the cosmos within time.20 The Taoist approach to the fundamental tension between order and chaos, so central to Mesopotamian and Egyptian myths, offers a distinct resolution. Instead of depicting a violent cosmic battle where order vanquishes chaos (like Marduk defeating Tiamat 3) or requiring constant vigilance to maintain order against encroaching disorder (like upholding Ma'at 7), Taoism finds harmony within the dynamic, cyclical interplay of natural forces (Yin-Yang).16 Order is not imposed but emerges naturally from the balance inherent in the Tao's flow. This fosters a philosophy of acceptance, adaptation, and alignment (Wu Wei 18), rather than one of conquest or rigid control. Furthermore, the conception of reality as fundamentally constituted by flowing energy (Qi 19) and governed by the all-pervading Tao 17 results in a metaphysics where process, change, and interrelation are primary ontological categories.16 This process-oriented view, emphasizing interconnectedness and transformation 17, stands in contrast to metaphysical systems, particularly later developments in the West, that prioritize static substances or discrete, independent entities as the fundamental building blocks of reality. ### D. Greek Origins: Myth, Reason, and the Search for the Arche Ancient Greek thought presents a fascinating transition from mythic cosmology to rational philosophical inquiry, laying the groundwork for Western metaphysics. Early Greek conceptions of the cosmos, as depicted in the works of poets like Hesiod (c. 8th-7th century BCE), shared some features with Near Eastern views but developed unique characteristics. Hesiod's Theogony provides a foundational, though not unchallenged, account.21 It begins not with ordered creation but with Chaos, a gaping void, from which emerge primordial deities like Gaia (Earth), Tartarus (the underworld abyss), and Eros (Desire).22 Subsequent generations of gods arise, marked by conflict and succession: Uranus (Sky) is overthrown by his son Cronus, who is in turn overthrown by Zeus, establishing the Olympian order.21 This narrative reflects a progression towards a more structured cosmos, achieved through divine power struggles. Hesiod's Works and Days introduces the Myth of the Five Ages (Golden, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, Iron), depicting a general decline from a primordial state of ease to the current age of toil and suffering, suggesting a linear, albeit deteriorating, view of human history within this specific myth.21 Alternative cosmological traditions existed alongside Hesiod's. The Homeric poems hint at an older view with Oceanus and Tethys as progenitors.23 Orphism, a mystery religion associated with the mythical poet Orpheus, offered distinct cosmogonies.21 Some Orphic accounts begin with Chronos (Time) personified, who generates Aether and Chaos, followed by a cosmic egg from which emerges Phanes (also identified with Eros or Dionysus), the primary creator figure.23 Orphism shared with other mystery cults a cyclical worldview, likely involving the reincarnation of the soul 25, and introduced the influential concept of the body as a prison or tomb for the divine soul (sōma-sēma).24 The philosopher Empedocles (5th century BCE) also proposed a cyclical cosmology driven by the alternating dominance of two fundamental forces: Love (Philia), which unites elements, and Strife (Neikos), which separates them.24 Beginning in the 6th century BCE in Ionia, the Pre-Socratic philosophers initiated a pivotal shift, moving away from purely mythopoetic explanations (mythos) towards rational inquiry (logos) into the nature of the cosmos.26 While diverse, they shared a fundamental assumption: that the universe is an intelligible whole (cosmos), possessing an underlying order comprehensible through reason, and that its explanation lay within nature itself, not in the capricious actions of anthropomorphic gods.26 Their central quest was the identification of the arche—the single, fundamental principle, origin, or substance from which everything else derives.26 The Milesian school pioneered this inquiry. Thales proposed Water as the arche, perhaps observing its necessity for life and its capacity for transformation.26 His student Anaximander rejected identifying the arche with any specific element, instead positing the Apeiron—an indefinite, boundless, or infinite primordial substance—as the source from which opposites differentiate and to which they return.26 Anaximenes, likely Anaximander's student, proposed Air, arguing that other elements arise from it through processes of condensation and rarefaction.26 Other Pre-Socratics offered different candidates: Heraclitus championed Fire and emphasized constant flux (panta rhei - "everything flows") 26; Pythagoras and his followers saw Number as the fundamental reality 26; the Eleatic school, led by Parmenides, argued radically that reality is a single, unchanging, eternal Being, and that change and multiplicity are illusory 26; Pluralists like Empedocles proposed multiple fundamental elements (Earth, Water, Air, Fire) combined and separated by Love and Strife 26, while Anaxagoras introduced Nous (Mind) as the ordering principle acting on a mixture of infinite seeds.27 This Pre-Socratic turn towards rational explanation can be understood as arising directly from the perceived limitations and inconsistencies of earlier mythic accounts.26 The existence of multiple, sometimes conflicting, creation stories 9 and the anthropomorphic nature of the gods likely spurred a desire for a more unified, coherent, and naturalistic understanding of the cosmos, grounded in a single, rationally identifiable principle—the arche. From Hesiod's Chaos yielding to Gaia and Tartarus 22, through the Orphic egg 23, to the Pre-Socratic search for the arche 26, early Greek thought grappled intensely with the relationship between unity and multiplicity, permanence and change. Parmenides' assertion of an unchanging One 26 stands in stark contrast to Heraclitus' insistence on universal flux 26, while Empedocles attempted to mediate this with his four elements and two forces.24 This fundamental tension—how to reconcile the singular, underlying reality with the diverse, changing world of experience—became a defining characteristic and a primary engine driving the subsequent development of Western metaphysics. ## II. Defining Reality: The Rise of Metaphysics and Foundational Eastern Systems Building upon the initial inquiries of myth and early philosophy, distinct and sophisticated systems for understanding the fundamental nature of reality emerged in both Greece and the East. In Greece, the inquiries of Plato and Aristotle formalized the study of metaphysics, while in India, Buddhist schools developed radical critiques of substance and explored the nature of consciousness and interdependence. ### A. The Greek Articulation: Plato's Forms, Aristotle's Substance, and "First Philosophy" Plato (c. 428-348 BCE), profoundly influenced by his teacher Socrates and reacting to the contrasting views of Heraclitus (flux) and Parmenides (stasis), developed his seminal Theory of Forms (or Ideas).30 This theory posits a two-tiered reality. The physical world we perceive through our senses is considered a realm of constant change, imperfection, and mere appearance—shadows on a cave wall.30 True reality resides in a transcendent, intelligible realm populated by Forms (eidos or idea).30 These Forms are the perfect, eternal, unchanging, non-physical essences of all things—such as the Form of Beauty, the Form of Justice, the Form of a Triangle, or the Form of Tableness.30 Physical objects derive whatever reality they possess by "participating" in or "imitating" their corresponding Forms.30 For Plato, these Forms are objectively real, existing independently of our minds and the physical world, and are knowable not through the unreliable senses, but through reason and philosophical contemplation.30 This metaphysical dualism is mirrored in his view of the human being: an immortal soul (akin to the Forms) temporarily imprisoned within a physical body.33 True knowledge, therefore, is not gained from empirical experience but is a process of recollection (anamnesis), whereby the soul remembers the Forms it encountered before its incarnation.32 Aristotle (384-322 BCE), Plato's most famous student, developed a profoundly influential, yet significantly different, metaphysical system. While accepting the need for stable essences, Aristotle rejected Plato's notion of transcendent, separate Forms, seeking instead to ground reality firmly within the observable, empirical world.34 He designated the highest form of theoretical science as "First Philosophy" (later termed Metaphysics), defining its subject matter as the study of "being qua being"—that is, being in its most fundamental aspect—and the investigation of first principles and causes.35 Central to Aristotle's metaphysics is the concept of substance (ousia).38 In his Categories, primary substance refers to individual, concrete things—this particular human, this specific horse—which exist independently, are not predicated of anything else (like a universal, e.g., 'humanity'), nor inherent in anything else (like a property, e.g., 'pale').38 Substances are the fundamental subjects to which properties (accidents) belong and of which universals can be predicated.38 In his later work, Metaphysics, Aristotle further analyzes substance as a composite of form (eidos or morphē) and matter (hylē).39 Form represents the essence, the defining characteristics, the "whatness" of a thing, which makes it the kind of thing it is. Matter represents the underlying stuff, the potentiality, the "thisness" that receives the form.39 Unlike Plato's transcendent Forms, Aristotelian form is immanent, existing only within particular substances.39 To explain change and development, Aristotle introduced his doctrine of the Four Causes: the Material Cause (the matter from which something is made), the Formal Cause (the essence or form), the Efficient Cause (the agent that brings something about), and the Final Cause (telos, the purpose or end for which something exists).34 Crucial to understanding change is also his distinction between potentiality (dunamis) and actuality (energeia or entelecheia).34 Matter represents potentiality—the capacity to become something—while form represents actuality—the realized state. Change, or motion (kinēsis), is understood as the process of actualizing a potentiality inherent in a substance, guided by its form and directed towards its telos.39 The term "metaphysics" itself has a contingent origin. It likely arose not from Aristotle, but from Andronicus of Rhodes, a later editor (1st century BCE) who compiled Aristotle's works. He placed the treatises dealing with "First Philosophy" after the writings on physics (ta meta ta physika), meaning simply "the [books] that come after the physics".36 While Aristotle used terms like "First Philosophy" or sometimes "theology" (when discussing the ultimate cause, the Unmoved Mover) 35, the editorial title "Metaphysics" stuck, eventually acquiring the connotation of inquiry into subjects "beyond" the physical realm.36 Aristotle's entire metaphysical framework, particularly his emphasis on immanent forms, substance as a form-matter composite, and the potentiality-actuality distinction, can be understood as a direct response to and modification of Plato's system.34 He sought to address perceived difficulties in the Theory of Forms, such as explaining the connection between the transcendent Forms and the particular objects of the physical world, and accounting for change and development within a more empirically grounded framework. His focus shifted from a separate realm of perfect essences to the inherent structures and developmental processes within the natural world itself. Despite their significant differences, both Plato and Aristotle solidified a central trajectory in Western philosophy: the quest to identify stable, intelligible structures or essences underlying the flux of ordinary experience. Plato located this stability in transcendent Forms 30, while Aristotle found it in the immanent form defining individual substances.38 This shared focus on uncovering a permanent reality behind transient appearances, inherited from the Pre-Socratic search for the arche and Parmenides' emphasis on unchanging Being, established a dominant paradigm in Western metaphysics for centuries to come. ### B. Eastern Perspectives on Being and Non-Being: Emptiness (Shunyata) and Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda) In stark contrast to the substance-oriented metaphysics developing in Greece, Buddhist philosophy in India, particularly the Madhyamaka school founded by Nagarjuna (c. 150-250 CE), offered a radical critique of essentialism.45 Nagarjuna, often revered as a "second Buddha," aimed to elucidate the core teachings of Buddhism through the central concept of Shunyata, typically translated as "Emptiness".45 It is crucial to understand that Shunyata does not signify nihilism (the belief that nothing exists, abhava) nor mere voidness in a literal sense.45 Rather, it denotes the lack of svabhava—inherent existence, intrinsic nature, or self-being.45 Nagarjuna argued that all phenomena (dharmas), including the self, are "empty" in this specific sense: they do not possess an independent, permanent, unchanging essence.45 This emptiness, Nagarjuna contended, is intrinsically linked to another core Buddhist doctrine: Pratītyasamutpāda, or Dependent Origination.46 This principle states that all phenomena arise and exist interdependently, in reliance upon causes and conditions.49 "If this exists, that exists; if this ceases to exist, that also ceases to exist" is a classic formulation.49 Things are empty of inherent existence precisely because they are dependently originated.46 Their reality is relational, contingent, and impermanent (anicca), devoid of any underlying, self-sufficient substance.49 Nagarjuna used rigorous logical analysis, particularly the reductio ad absurdum (prasanga) method, to deconstruct substantialist views, both within other Buddhist schools and in competing Brahminical philosophies (like Nyaya-Vaisheshika), demonstrating the contradictions inherent in assuming fixed essences or independent entities.45 To navigate the apparent contradiction between the conventional reality we experience and the ultimate truth of emptiness, Madhyamaka employs the doctrine of Two Truths: samvṛti-satya (conventional or relative truth) and paramārtha-satya (ultimate truth).53 Conventional truth refers to our everyday understanding and the way things appear to function within the world of dependent origination. Ultimate truth refers to the realization of emptiness, the lack of inherent existence in all phenomena.53 These are not two separate realities but two ways of understanding the single reality. Emptiness itself, Nagarjuna argued, is also empty—it is not another substance or absolute ground but is itself dependently originated and conventionally designated.46 This "emptiness of emptiness" prevents Shunyata from being reified into a new absolute. Pratītyasamutpāda serves not only as the ontological basis for emptiness but also as the framework for understanding the arising and cessation of suffering (dukkha).51 The most common depiction is the Twelve Nidānas (Links of Dependent Origination), which illustrate how ignorance (avidyā) about the true nature of reality (impermanence, suffering, non-self) leads to mental formations (samskāra), consciousness (vijñāna), name-and-form (nāmarūpa), the six senses (ṣaḍāyatana), contact (sparśa), feeling (vedanā), craving (tṛṣṇā), clinging (upādāna), becoming (bhava), birth (jāti), and finally aging and death (jarāmaraṇa).50 This chain describes the cyclical process of samsara, driven by ignorance and craving.51 However, because the process is conditional, it can be reversed. By cultivating wisdom (understanding emptiness and dependent origination) and cutting off craving, the chain can be broken, leading to the cessation of suffering and liberation (Nirvana).51 This contrasts significantly with Western notions of linear, efficient causation, emphasizing instead a web of mutual conditioning.49 The Buddhist concepts of Shunyata and Pratītyasamutpāda thus present a fundamental challenge to the substance-based metaphysics exemplified by Plato and Aristotle.45 Where the Greek tradition predominantly sought enduring substances or inherent essences as the ground of reality 30, Madhyamaka radically denies such inherent existence (svabhava), prioritizing instead relationality, interdependence, and process as the fundamental characteristics of all phenomena. The very ground of being shifts from independent entities to the dynamic interplay of conditions. This focus on dependent origination entails a process-oriented view of reality, where relationships and conditioning factors are ontologically prior to any seemingly discrete "thing".49 Existence is understood not as a collection of static objects but as a continuous flow of arising and ceasing phenomena. This has profound implications, undermining the notion of fixed identities, recasting causality as systemic interdependence rather than linear action, and deconstructing the idea of a permanent, independent self (anattā)—a cornerstone of Buddhist thought.49 ### C. Consciousness and Reality: The Yogacara School Another major Mahayana Buddhist school, Yogacara (literally "Yoga Practice"), also known as Vijñānavāda ("Doctrine of Consciousness") or Cittamātra ("Mind-Only"), offered a different but related perspective on reality, focusing on the primacy of consciousness.55 Flourishing from the 4th century CE with figures like Asanga and Vasubandhu 57, Yogacara philosophy posits that all phenomena are ultimately mental projections or "representations-only" (vijñapti-mātra).56 It challenges the existence of an objective, mind-independent external world, arguing that what we perceive as external objects are constructed by and within consciousness itself.55 Central to Yogacara is the theory of the Eight Consciousnesses. This model expands upon earlier Buddhist analyses of mind by introducing the foundational ālaya-vijñāna, or "storehouse consciousness".55 The ālaya-vijñāna serves as a deep, underlying stream of consciousness that carries the karmic seeds (bīja)—latent potentials resulting from past actions—and habitual tendencies or "perfumings" (vāsanā) accumulated over countless lifetimes.55 These seeds ripen under appropriate conditions, projecting the apparently objective world experienced by the other seven consciousnesses (the five sense consciousnesses, the mental consciousness coordinating sensory input, and the defiled mental consciousness, manas, responsible for the illusion of a separate self).58 The ālaya itself is not static but in constant flux, providing continuity across lifetimes and explaining the mechanism of karma.55 To further elucidate the relationship between consciousness and reality, Yogacara developed the doctrine of the Three Natures (trisvabhāva).58 This framework analyzes experience at three levels: 1. The Imagined or Constructed Nature (parikalpita-svabhāva): This refers to the world as conventionally perceived, characterized by the false imposition of subject-object duality and conceptual proliferation. It is the realm of illusion, where we mistakenly attribute inherent existence to things that are merely mental constructs.58 2. The Dependent Nature (paratantra-svabhāva): This refers to the underlying flow of dependently originated phenomena—the stream of consciousness and its transformations, driven by causes and conditions (karmic seeds). It is the basis upon which the imagined nature is projected, emphasizing the interconnectedness and lack of inherent existence, aligning with the principle of pratītyasamutpāda.58 3. The Perfected or Consummate Nature (pariniṣpanna-svabhāva): This represents ultimate reality, the true nature of things, realized when the mind is purified of the imagined nature. It is characterized by emptiness (shunyata), non-duality, and the cessation of conceptual fabrication. It is the reality apprehended directly in enlightenment.58 While Yogacara's "Mind-Only" thesis might appear as a form of metaphysical idealism, many interpreters argue its primary aim is phenomenological and soteriological.56 By analyzing how consciousness constructs our experience of reality, including the illusion of a separate self and an external world, Yogacara seeks to deconstruct the subject-object duality that lies at the root of suffering.58 In this sense, its ultimate goal converges with Madhyamaka's—the realization of emptiness and non-duality—but it approaches this goal through a detailed exploration of cognitive processes rather than primarily through logical refutation.58 It provides a different explanatory framework, centered on the workings of the mind, to arrive at a similar understanding of ultimate reality as dependently arisen and empty of inherent existence. The Yogacara school's detailed analysis of consciousness, particularly the concepts of ālaya-vijñāna and vāsanā (habitual tendencies), offered a sophisticated psychological model with significant implications.58 It provided a framework for explaining subjective experience, the mechanisms of karmic continuity across lifetimes, and the process of liberation through the transformation and purification of consciousness via meditative practices (yoga).55 This intricate mapping of the mind influenced later developments in Buddhist epistemology, logic, and psychology across Asia.58 ### D. Early Comparative Insights: Substance, Causality, and the Nature of the Real Comparing these foundational Greek and Indian systems reveals early and profound divergences in metaphysical orientation. The dominant Western trajectory, established by Plato and Aristotle, focused on identifying stable, enduring realities—whether transcendent Forms or immanent substances defined by essences—as the anchors of being.30 In contrast, major Eastern traditions like Buddhism and Taoism emphasized process, interdependence, and the lack of fixed, inherent existence (svabhava, shunyata).16 This difference is mirrored in their understanding of causality. Aristotle's framework, particularly his emphasis on efficient and final causes, sought to explain the directed change of substances towards their inherent ends.34 Buddhist thought, via Pratītyasamutpāda, presented causality as a complex, impersonal web of mutual conditioning, explaining the arising of phenomena and suffering without recourse to inherent natures or ultimate purposes in the Aristotelian sense.49 Taoism envisioned change occurring naturally according to the underlying flow and principles of the Tao.17 Conceptions of ultimate reality also diverged. Plato proposed a sharp distinction between the perfect realm of Forms and the imperfect physical world.30 Aristotle argued for a single reality composed of formed matter.39 Madhyamaka Buddhism utilized the Two Truths doctrine to reconcile conventional experience with the ultimate reality of emptiness.53 Yogacara located reality primarily within consciousness itself.56 A fundamental contrast emerges in the core metaphors used: Western thought often gravitated towards metaphors of being—stable forms, underlying substances, unchanging essences—while Eastern thought frequently employed metaphors of becoming or relating—the flow of the Tao, the interdependent arising of phenomena, the emptiness of static selfhood. While Heraclitus represented a counter-current of flux in Greece 26, the dominant philosophical lineage prioritized permanence. Conversely, while some Indian schools (like Nyaya-Vaisheshika, critiqued by Nagarjuna 45) posited enduring substances, the influential Buddhist and Taoist traditions centered on dynamism and relationality. Despite these stark differences, both Eastern and Western traditions grappled with the perennial philosophical problem of the relationship between the universal and the particular. Plato addressed it through the participation of particulars in universal Forms.30 Aristotle explained it through the inherence of universal form in particular matter.39 Madhyamaka viewed particulars as dependently arisen manifestations, empty of any inherent universal nature.45 Yogacara saw particulars as projections of consciousness rooted in a deeper, shared consciousness.55 Taoism perceived the "ten thousand things" as diverse expressions of the single, universal Tao.17 The fundamental question of how unity relates to multiplicity was posed across cultures, even if the answers offered revealed deeply divergent metaphysical commitments. ## III. Time's Trajectory: Linear Paths and Revolving Wheels Perhaps one of the most striking and consequential divergences between dominant Eastern and Western worldviews lies in their fundamental conceptions of time. While many Eastern traditions perceived time as cyclical, an endlessly repeating series of ages, the Abrahamic religions fostered a distinctly linear understanding of history, imbued with purpose and direction. These contrasting frameworks have profoundly shaped cultural attitudes, ethical values, and the very meaning of existence. ### A. The Linear Narrative: Abrahamic Religions and the Concept of Historical Progression The major Abrahamic faiths—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—generally share a conception of time as linear and directional.59 This timeline possesses a definite beginning, typically understood as God's act of Creation, and progresses towards a specific end, an eschatological culmination involving events such as the arrival of the Messiah, the Day of Judgment, the Second Coming of Christ, or the establishment of a final Kingdom of God.59 This linear structure stands in sharp contrast to the cyclical views prevalent in many other cultures.59 This linear perspective imbues history with profound meaning and teleological purpose. Events are not merely random occurrences or repetitions but are often interpreted as part of a divine plan unfolding through time, a Heilsgeschichte or "salvational history".61 Saint Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), in his influential work The City of God, articulated a powerful Christian version of this view. He argued forcefully against the cyclical conceptions of pagan philosophies, positing instead that time began with God's creation and moves purposefully towards a divinely ordained goal—the final judgment and the separation of the City of God (the faithful) and the Earthly City (the damned).62 For Augustine, history has a definite direction, culminating in the fulfillment of God's plan.62 He also distinguished between temporal time, the changing succession experienced by humans, and God's eternity, an unchanging, timeless present.62 Within the Christian framework, the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are often seen as the central, pivotal event, the climax of history that fundamentally alters its course.63 While linearity is dominant, nuances exist within Abrahamic traditions. Jewish historical consciousness, for instance, recognizes repeating patterns of exile, return, and covenant renewal within the broader arc of salvific history.63 Some Kabbalistic interpretations envision cycles operating within the overall linear progression towards the Messianic Age.63 The Old Testament book of Ecclesiastes presents a perspective closer to cyclical views, speaking of seasons for everything and suggesting time is beyond human control.60 Hebrew itself possesses multiple words for different aspects of time, reflecting complex conceptualizations, and medieval Jewish philosophers debated whether time was a divine attribute or intrinsically linked to motion, engaging with Aristotelian and Neoplatonic ideas.63 Some interpretations even suggest a view of time as both directional and cyclical, a "line of cycles".63 The development of a linear, eschatological framework in these traditions appears strongly connected to the historical experiences of suffering, exile, and persecution. The promise of a future culmination—a Day of Judgment, a Messianic redemption, a final victory of good over evil—provided meaning, hope, and a sense of ultimate justice in the face of present tribulations.59 As argued regarding the biblical concept of Judgement Day, such eschatological beliefs served not only as theological doctrines but also as powerful psychological balms, structuring the universe as a deliberate narrative overseen by a just God, ensuring that suffering was not meaningless and oppression not final.61 This linear conception of time fostered distinctive cultural and philosophical developments. It underpins notions of historical progress, unique and unrepeatable events (like Creation or the Incarnation), and the possibility of cumulative development towards a future goal.64 This perspective became deeply ingrained in Western historical consciousness, influencing ideas about modernity, development, and the forward march of civilization, often carrying the implicit assumption that "modern means better".61 ### B. The Eternal Return: Cyclical Time in Hindu, Buddhist, and Taoist Thought In contrast to the Abrahamic linear model, many major Eastern traditions, along with various other ancient cultures, embraced a cyclical view of time. In Hinduism, as previously noted, time unfolds in immense, repeating cycles known as kalpas, each subdivided into four yugas (Satya, Treta, Dvapara, Kali) of decreasing virtue, culminating in dissolution before a new cycle begins.13 This cosmic rhythm, sometimes visualized as the Kalachakra or "Wheel of Time" 60, governs the universe's creation, preservation, and destruction, often associated with the Trimurti.13 The doctrine of avatars, particularly the successive incarnations of Vishnu appearing in different ages to restore dharma, further reinforces this cyclical pattern.64 Buddhism, born out of the Indian cultural matrix, inherited this cyclical backdrop. While the primary focus is on achieving Nirvana and escaping the cycle of Samsara 15, the framework of existence itself is understood as cyclical and potentially beginningless.15 The doctrine of Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda) describes the causal chain that perpetuates this cycle of rebirth.50 Furthermore, some Buddhist traditions speak of cycles in the lifespan of the Buddha's teachings (Dharma), predicting periods of decline followed by the appearance of a future Buddha (Maitreya) to rediscover and renew the path.59 Taoism, as discussed earlier, also views time as fundamentally cyclical, mirroring the observed rhythms of the natural world—day and night, the seasons, life and death.16 The emphasis is not on escaping the cycle but on understanding its patterns and living in harmony with the natural flow of the Tao, embracing change as an inherent part of existence.16 This cyclical perspective was not limited to India and China. Ancient Greek thought contained significant cyclical currents, particularly among the Stoics and Pythagoreans who believed in eternal recurrence (apokatastasis), and in the philosophies of Empedocles and Orphism.24 Various other cultures, including the ancient Egyptians (linked to Ra's journey and the Nile's flood 10), the Aztecs and Mayans with their intricate calendrical cycles 64, Native American traditions, and the Old Norse, also shared cyclical conceptions of time.66 Even the 14th-century Muslim historian Ibn Khaldūn observed cyclical patterns in the rise and fall of dynasties driven by the waxing and waning of social cohesion (Asabiyyah).64 The prevalence of cyclical views across diverse cultures often appears rooted in the direct observation of natural recurrences.64 The regular cycles of the sun and moon, the predictable return of the seasons, the rhythm of tides, biological cycles like menstruation, and the universal pattern of birth, life, and death provide powerful, tangible models for understanding time.66 Projecting these observable patterns onto the cosmos itself seems a natural step in early attempts to make sense of the temporal dimension of existence. The cyclical view arises organically from the perceived rhythms of the environment. While both linear and cyclical frameworks grapple with the reality of change, they often interpret its significance differently. Cyclical views tend to incorporate decay, destruction, and renewal as necessary and natural phases of an ongoing process.13 The end of one cycle is simply the prelude to the beginning of the next. Linear narratives, conversely, may frame decay as a consequence of a fall from an original ideal state (like the Fall in Genesis) or view the end-time as a final, decisive transformation leading to a permanent state of redemption or damnation, rather than another turn of the wheel.59 This fundamental difference in interpreting beginnings, endings, and the nature of change has profound implications for how cultures understand history, suffering, and the ultimate purpose or pattern of existence. ### C. Philosophical Implications: Freedom, Fate, and the Meaning of Existence The contrasting architectures of linear and cyclical time carry significant philosophical and psychological weight, shaping how meaning is constructed, how freedom and determinism are conceived, and how individuals relate to change and mortality. In linear frameworks, meaning and purpose are often derived from an understanding of one's place within the historical narrative and contribution towards its ultimate goal or telos.61 Life gains significance through participation in the unfolding divine plan or the march of progress. Conversely, in cyclical worldviews, meaning may be found in recognizing the nature of the cycle itself and one's position within it. For traditions like Hinduism and Buddhism, the ultimate goal is often liberation (Moksha, Nirvana) from the cycle of Samsara, suggesting that true meaning lies beyond the repetitive turnings of worldly existence.12 In Taoism, meaning arises from harmonizing with the natural, cyclical flow of the Tao, finding contentment and balance within the present moment rather than striving towards a future endpoint.16 The relationship between time and freedom/determinism is complex in both models. A linear history guided by an omniscient divine plan might seem deterministic 61, yet Abrahamic traditions strongly emphasize individual moral responsibility and free will, which impact one's fate in the final judgment. Cyclical views driven by impersonal laws like Karma 13 or cosmic rhythms might also appear deterministic. However, the possibility of liberation through conscious effort, insight, and ethical conduct implies a capacity for agency to alter one's trajectory within or ultimately escape the cycle.51 Attitudes towards change and impermanence also differ. Linear time can foster either optimism about future progress and culmination or anxiety about the finality of the end and judgment.61 The unidirectional nature of time can create a sense of urgency and motivation, but also pressure and fear of mortality.67 Cyclical time, by normalizing recurrence and impermanence, can cultivate acceptance, detachment, and a focus on the present moment.16 However, the prospect of potentially endless repetition within Samsara can also generate profound anxiety and a deep longing for release.64 Psychologically, linear time may be perceived as an enemy to be conquered or managed, while cyclical time might allow one to "slow down" and appreciate recurring patterns, though perhaps at the cost of ambition.68 The perception of time, therefore, is not merely an abstract metaphysical postulate but a foundational element that profoundly shapes ethical systems, societal values, and individual experience. Linear frameworks tend to support values associated with progress, achievement, historical significance, and future-oriented goals.61 Cyclical frameworks often underpin values related to harmony, balance, acceptance of impermanence, detachment, and liberation from worldly processes.13 The temporal structure a culture adopts provides the very stage upon which its drama of meaning, purpose, and value unfolds. It is crucial, however, to avoid oversimplification. The dichotomy between linear and cyclical time is not absolute. As noted, hybrid models and internal variations exist within traditions.63 Jewish thought incorporates patterns of recurrence within its overarching salvific history.63 Thinkers like Toynbee proposed models integrating cyclical challenges with the potential for linear advancement.65 The lived experience of time for individuals within any culture likely involves elements of both linearity (personal growth, life stages, memory) and cyclicality (daily routines, seasons, recurring emotions). The pure linear and cyclical models may function more as ideal types or dominant tendencies rather than exhaustive descriptions of how time is always conceived or experienced. The following table summarizes key distinctions between these two dominant conceptions of time: | | | | |---|---|---| |Feature|Cyclical Time|Linear Time| |Core Metaphor|Wheel, Cycle, Spiral|Line, Arrow, River, Narrative| |Origin / End|Often beginningless/endless; repeating patterns; dissolution leads to renewal|Definite beginning (e.g., Creation); definite end (e.g., Eschaton)| |Nature of History|Recurrent patterns, ages repeat; history as repetition or variation on themes|Unique progression, sequence of unrepeatable events; history as development| |Concept of Progress|Often limited, illusory, or secondary to the cycle itself|Possible, often central; movement towards a goal or higher state| |Associated Traditions|Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Ancient Greek (Stoics, Orphics), Mayan|Abrahamic Religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), Modern Western thought| |View of Change|Natural, inevitable part of the cycle (growth, decay, renewal)|Often deviation from an ideal, a step towards a goal, or leading to finality| |Source of Meaning|Harmony with cycle, understanding patterns, liberation from the cycle|Contribution to progress, role in divine plan, final redemption/outcome| |Psychological Implication|Acceptance, detachment, potential anxiety of repetition, focus on present|Hope, motivation, potential anxiety about future/end, focus on past/future| Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Cyclical and Linear Time Concepts (Synthesized from 12) ## IV. Medieval and Renaissance Bridges and Divergences The medieval and Renaissance periods witnessed significant developments in both Western and Eastern philosophical traditions. In the West, Scholasticism sought to synthesize Christian theology with rediscovered Aristotelian philosophy, while the Renaissance saw a resurgence of humanism and Neoplatonism. In the East, Neo-Confucianism emerged as a powerful intellectual force in China, responding to the long dominance of Buddhism and Taoism, while Buddhist thought continued to evolve, notably with the development of Zen. ### A. Western Developments: Scholasticism's Synthesis (Aquinas) and Humanism's Flourishing (Pico) Medieval Scholasticism, particularly in its mature phase during the 13th century, represented a monumental effort to harmonize Christian faith with philosophical reason, primarily through the integration of Aristotelian thought, which had been reintroduced to Western Europe largely via Islamic philosophers.41 Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) stands as the preeminent figure of this synthesis. Following Aristotle, Aquinas understood metaphysics as the study of "being qua being".40 He adopted and adapted key Aristotelian concepts, viewing substance as a composite of matter and form, and distinguishing between a thing's essence (what it is) and its accidents (non-essential properties).40 However, Aquinas introduced a crucial distinction, deeply informed by Christian theology, between a thing's essence and its esse—its act of existing.40 For all created beings (contingent beings), essence and existence are distinct; their existence is received and dependent. Only in God, the Necessary Being, are essence and existence identical; God is pure actuality (actus purus), the uncaused cause whose very nature is "to be".41 God's esse is the ultimate source and ground for the existence of all contingent beings.40 Aquinas masterfully employed Aristotelian concepts of causality, particularly efficient causality, in his famous "Five Ways" to argue for God's existence as the Unmoved Mover, the First Cause, the Necessary Being, the source of all perfection, and the ultimate governor of the universe.41 He utilized the distinction between essentially ordered causal series (where intermediate causes depend on the first cause simultaneously) and accidentally ordered series (where earlier causes need not persist) to argue for the necessity of a First Cause in any essential series.70 Scholasticism, particularly Thomism, established a powerful and enduring intellectual framework that profoundly shaped Western thought.69 The European Renaissance (roughly mid-15th to early 17th century) marked a shift in focus away from the theocentric concerns of medieval Scholasticism towards humanism, politics, and the natural world.71 Renaissance humanism emphasized the study of classical literature and rhetoric, often favoring the dialogues of Plato over the systematic treatises of Aristotle, and celebrated human potential and dignity.71 Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) exemplifies the intellectual ferment and syncretic spirit of the era.74 A prominent figure associated with the Platonic Academy in Florence fostered by Lorenzo de' Medici 71, Pico embarked on an ambitious project to harmonize diverse philosophical and religious traditions.73 He believed that Plato and Aristotle ultimately expressed the same truths in different terms and sought to synthesize their ideas with Neoplatonism, Hermeticism, Islamic and Jewish philosophy (including Averroes and Avicenna), and, most notably, the Jewish mystical tradition of Kabbalah.73 His 900 Theses, intended for public debate in Rome, drew propositions from this vast array of sources, reflecting his belief in a universal underlying wisdom.73 Pico is particularly famed for his Oration (posthumously titled On the Dignity of Man), where he argues that humanity's unique distinction lies not in a fixed place in the hierarchy of being, but in its radical freedom—the God-given ability to choose its own nature and ascend towards the divine through intellectual and mystical pursuits.71 This ascent involved philosophy, but also esoteric practices derived from magic and Kabbalah, which Pico pioneered as a Christian tradition, believing it held ancient secrets confirming Christian truths.73 Alongside figures like Marsilio Ficino, who focused on translating and interpreting Plato and Neoplatonic texts 77, Pico represented a vibrant, albeit sometimes esoteric, strand of Renaissance thought that sought universal harmony through a synthesis of diverse wisdom traditions. The intellectual trajectory from Scholasticism to Renaissance humanism reveals a complex interplay of continuity and reaction. While Renaissance thinkers like Pico reacted against the perceived constraints and methods of Scholasticism 71, they often continued the medieval project of synthesis, albeit by drawing on a much wider and more eclectic range of sources, including Neoplatonic and mystical traditions that had been less central to high Scholasticism.73 The focus shifted significantly from a primarily Aristotelian-Christian framework towards a broader engagement with classical antiquity and esoteric wisdom, coupled with a renewed emphasis on human agency and potential.71 Despite these shifts, both Scholasticism and the Neoplatonic humanism of the Renaissance demonstrate a recurring characteristic of Western intellectual history: the drive to construct comprehensive, unified systems of understanding. Aquinas integrated Aristotelian science and metaphysics into a Christian theological framework.41 Pico and Ficino sought to weave together threads from Platonism, Neoplatonism, Hermeticism, Kabbalah, and other sources into a grand philosophical harmony.73 This impulse towards grand synthesis, absorbing and reinterpreting diverse intellectual currents within an overarching structure, appears as a persistent feature during these periods. ### B. Eastern Flourishing: Neo-Confucianism (Li/Qi) and Buddhist Elaborations (Zen) Parallel developments and transformations were occurring in the East. In China, the Song Dynasty (960-1279) witnessed the rise of Neo-Confucianism, a major intellectual and social movement that revitalized Confucian thought after centuries of Buddhist and Taoist dominance.78 Neo-Confucian thinkers sought to provide Confucianism with a more robust metaphysical foundation to address the sophisticated cosmological and psychological frameworks offered by Buddhism and Taoism.79 The resulting synthesis established a new orthodoxy that would shape Chinese intellectual life for centuries.80 Central to Neo-Confucian metaphysics is the dualistic concept of Li and Qi.81 Li refers to the underlying Principle, pattern, or rational order inherent in the universe and all things within it. It is often understood as having a moral dimension, representing the ultimate standard of goodness and propriety.82 Qi refers to the vital force, the psycho-physical energy-matter that constitutes all concrete existence.81 All phenomena are understood as manifestations arising from the interaction or combination of Li and Qi.81 Within Neo-Confucianism, two main schools of thought emerged regarding the relationship between Li, Qi, and the human mind, primarily associated with Zhu Xi (1130-1200) and Wang Yangming (1472-1529).79 Zhu Xi, whose synthesis (known as Lixue, the School of Principle) became the state orthodoxy 80, argued that Li is ontologically prior to Qi. He maintained that human nature (xing) is fundamentally Li, but this pure principle can be obscured by the individual's physical endowment (Qi).81 Therefore, understanding Principle requires diligent study and the "investigation of things" (gewu)—examining the principles inherent in external affairs and objects to gradually apprehend the universal Li.79 Wang Yangming, representing the Xinxue (School of Mind/Heart), offered a contrasting view.79 He argued that Mind (Xin) itself is Principle (Li).79 Since Li is inherent in one's own mind, understanding moral principle does not require looking outward but rather looking inward, clearing the mind of selfish desires that obscure its original nature.79 Wang emphasized the concept of liangzhi, innate moral knowing, an intuitive capacity present in all individuals to distinguish good from evil.81 For Wang, knowledge and action were unified; true knowledge inherently leads to corresponding action. Both schools, despite their differences on methodology, shared the core Confucian goal of moral self-cultivation aimed at achieving sagehood and promoting social harmony.80 Buddhist thought also continued to evolve during this period. Chan (Zen) Buddhism, which had developed in China during the Tang Dynasty (618-906) through a synthesis of Mahayana Buddhist doctrines (like emptiness and consciousness theory) with Taoist sensibilities 78, emphasized direct experience, meditation, and the possibility of sudden enlightenment. Its transmission to Japan led to the flourishing of Japanese Zen 83, which stressed practices aimed at realizing one's inherent Buddha-nature, often through disciplined meditation (zazen) and the contemplation of paradoxical statements (kōan). While Zen often eschewed complex metaphysical speculation in favor of experiential realization, its core concepts of emptiness (sunyata), no-mind (mushin), and the non-dual nature of reality would profoundly influence later Japanese philosophers like Nishida Kitarō in their engagement with Western thought.84 Intriguingly, the central debate within Neo-Confucianism between Zhu Xi's emphasis on investigating external principle (Li in things) 79 and Wang Yangming's focus on the mind as the locus of principle (Li is Mind) 79 resonates with long-standing epistemological and metaphysical debates in the West. The tension mirrors, in a distinct cultural idiom, the Western philosophical polarity between prioritizing empirical observation of the external world (akin to empiricism or Aristotle's focus on particulars) versus emphasizing internal reason or innate structures of consciousness (akin to rationalism or Plato's reliance on reason to grasp Forms). Both traditions, East and West, grappled with the fundamental question of where ultimate reality or governing principles are to be found—whether primarily "out there" in the world or "in here" within the mind or soul—and consequently, what methods are appropriate for accessing truth. Furthermore, the development of Neo-Confucianism itself exemplifies a process of philosophical syncretism analogous to that seen in medieval and Renaissance Europe. Faced with the profound metaphysical and psychological systems of Buddhism and Taoism, Confucian scholars did not simply reject these rival traditions but actively incorporated and reinterpreted concepts from them (such as notions of ultimate reality, mind, and cosmology) to construct a more comprehensive and sophisticated Confucian metaphysics centered on Li and Qi.78 This process allowed Confucianism to address the challenges posed by its competitors and reassert its intellectual and social relevance, demonstrating a dynamic capacity for adaptation and synthesis in response to external intellectual pressures. ### C. Intercultural Currents and Evolving Worldviews Direct philosophical interaction between East and West remained limited during the medieval and early Renaissance periods, though not entirely absent. European knowledge of the East was often filtered through intermediaries or based on ancient, sometimes romanticized, accounts. Neoplatonists, for instance, looked to Egypt and the "Chaldean mysteries" as sources of ancient wisdom, constructing an image of the "East" as a repository of esoteric knowledge.88 Conversely, elements of "Western Learning" (Xixue), primarily Jesuit transmissions of European science (mathematics, astronomy) and Christianity, began to trickle into China during the late Ming and early Qing dynasties.78 However, deep, systematic philosophical exchange was rare. The very categories of "East" and "West" are complex historical constructs, and applying them rigidly risks obscuring intricate local developments and occasional cross-cultural currents.88 Despite the limited direct dialogue, the developments within each sphere during this era solidified distinct philosophical trajectories and metaphysical frameworks. The West saw the consolidation of the Aristotelian-Thomistic synthesis and the subsequent rise of humanism with its Neoplatonic and individualistic strands, grappling with the relationship between faith, reason, substance, and human freedom. The East, particularly China, witnessed the sophisticated metaphysical articulation of Neo-Confucianism (Li/Qi) as a response to and integration of Buddhist and Taoist ideas, focusing on principle, vital force, mind, and moral cultivation. These distinct developments laid the essential groundwork for the more intensive, explicit, and often confrontational encounters between Eastern and Western thought that would characterize the modern period. The well-defined metaphysical and ethical systems forged during the medieval and Renaissance eras would become the primary points of reference, comparison, and contention when broader global interaction intensified in subsequent centuries. ## V. Modernity's Crucible: Reason, Experience, and the Scientific Revolution The modern period, particularly from the 17th century onward, ushered in profound intellectual transformations in the West, driven by the Scientific Revolution and the philosophical movements of the Enlightenment. These developments radically reshaped understandings of knowledge, reality, causality, space, and time, setting the stage for contemporary physics and its philosophical reverberations, while also prompting new forms of engagement with Eastern thought. ### A. The Enlightenment's Impact: Rationalism, Empiricism, and Kant's Synthesis The Enlightenment era in Europe was marked by intense philosophical debate concerning the foundations of knowledge and the nature of reality, largely revolving around the competing traditions of rationalism and empiricism.90 Rationalism, exemplified by figures like René Descartes (1596-1650), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716), emphasized the power of reason as the primary source of knowledge. Descartes sought certain foundations through methodical doubt, arriving at the thinking self (cogito ergo sum) and positing innate ideas, including the idea of God, and a sharp dualism between thinking substance (mind) and extended substance (body).90 Spinoza developed a radical rationalist monism, arguing for a single, infinite substance (identified as God or Nature) possessing infinite attributes, of which thought and extension are the two known to humans. All individual things, minds and bodies alike, are merely modes or affections of this one substance, unfolding according to necessary, deterministic laws.91 Leibniz proposed a system of pre-established harmony among innumerable simple substances (monads), governed by the principle of sufficient reason.90 Empiricism, championed by Francis Bacon (1561-1626), John Locke (1632-1704), and David Hume (1711-1776), countered that knowledge originates primarily, if not solely, from sensory experience.90 Locke famously argued against innate ideas, proposing the mind at birth is a tabula rasa (blank slate) upon which experience writes.90 Hume pushed empiricism towards skepticism, questioning the rational justification for beliefs in causality, substance, and the external world, arguing they arise from habit and custom rather than reason or direct perception. While influential figures like Isaac Newton employed empirical methods with great success in physics 90, empiricism faced challenges in grounding scientific knowledge and avoiding skepticism. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), recognizing the limitations and unresolved conflicts of both pure rationalism and pure empiricism, undertook a "Critique of Pure Reason" to determine the limits and scope of human understanding.93 He argued against the empiricists that the mind is not merely passive but actively structures experience through inherent cognitive frameworks.93 However, he rejected the rationalist claim that reason alone could provide knowledge of a reality independent of experience.93 Kant's "Copernican Revolution" proposed that objects conform to our cognition, rather than cognition conforming to objects.93 He distinguished between phenomena (things as they appear to us, structured by our minds) and noumena (things as they are in themselves, which remain unknowable).93 Our experience of phenomena is necessarily structured by the a priori forms of sensibility—space and time—which are not properties of things-in-themselves but the very conditions of our perception.93 Furthermore, the understanding organizes sensory input through a priori concepts or categories, such as substance, causality, unity, and plurality, which are necessary for coherent experience and objective judgment.93 Thus, Kant sought to secure the foundations of mathematics and natural science (which deal with phenomena) while demonstrating the impossibility of traditional speculative metaphysics (which attempts to access noumena).93 Kant's critical philosophy can be understood as a direct response to the philosophical impasse created by the rationalist-empiricist debates and the perceived inability of traditional metaphysics to achieve the certainty demonstrated by the new sciences.90 By investigating the inherent structures and limitations of reason itself, Kant aimed to delineate precisely what could and could not be known, thereby resolving the conflicts and setting philosophy on what he considered a secure path. This Kantian turn marked a significant shift in the trajectory of Western metaphysics. While ontological questions about the ultimate nature of reality did not disappear, the focus increasingly shifted towards epistemology—the analysis of the conditions, structure, and limits of human knowledge.93 The Enlightenment emphasis on reason, individual autonomy (captured in Kant's motto "Sapere aude!" – Dare to know! 90), and the critique of unquestioned authority 90 propelled philosophy into a more independent role, often challenging traditional religious and metaphysical doctrines while simultaneously exploring the foundations of the burgeoning natural and human sciences.90 ### B. Scientific Cosmology Emerges: From Newton to Einstein's Relativity The Scientific Revolution profoundly impacted conceptions of the cosmos, particularly regarding space and time. The Newtonian framework, dominant for over two centuries, depicted space as an absolute, infinite, three-dimensional container, independent of the objects within it, and time as an absolute, uniform flow, independent of events.60 This provided the backdrop for classical physics. Albert Einstein's theories of Relativity, developed in the early 20th century, shattered this classical view.95 His Special Theory of Relativity (1905), based on the principles that the laws of physics are the same for all uniformly moving observers and that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant for all observers 94, led to revolutionary consequences. Most notably, it revealed the relativity of simultaneity: whether two spatially separated events occur "at the same time" depends on the observer's frame of reference, dismantling the notion of a universal, absolute present.94 Space and time were no longer independent but interwoven into a four-dimensional continuum: spacetime.95 His General Theory of Relativity (1915) further revolutionized this picture by describing gravity not as a force acting at a distance, but as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy.94 Spacetime was no longer merely a passive stage but an active participant in physical dynamics. These scientific breakthroughs had immediate and profound philosophical repercussions. Einstein's theories directly challenged Kant's conception of space and time as fixed, a priori forms of human intuition; instead, they appeared to be physical structures whose properties were determined empirically and could be affected by matter and energy.96 This sparked famous debates, such as the one between Einstein and the philosopher Henri Bergson. Einstein, viewing time as a dimension within spacetime (leading many philosophers to interpret relativity as supporting eternalism or a "block universe" view where past, present, and future co-exist objectively 94), clashed with Bergson, who championed the primacy of subjective, lived duration (durée) and argued that physical time (clock time) was an abstraction that missed the essence of temporal experience.95 More broadly, relativity demonstrated how fundamental questions about the nature of space, time, and simultaneity, previously considered largely metaphysical, could be decisively addressed and reshaped by empirical science.96 It also reframed the debate between absolute and relational views of spacetime, with arguments like the "hole argument" using the structure of General Relativity to challenge spacetime substantivalism (the view that spacetime exists independently like a substance).94 Einstein's Relativity thus represents a major scientific and conceptual paradigm shift. It not only replaced the Newtonian model but forced a fundamental re-evaluation of core metaphysical assumptions about the structure of reality, demonstrating the potent influence of scientific discovery on philosophical inquiry.94 Intriguingly, the implications of relativity, particularly the relativity of simultaneity 94 and the philosophical interpretations favouring eternalism or a "block universe" 94, find unexpected echoes in certain Eastern conceptions of time. For example, the Zen philosopher Dōgen's 13th-century concept of Uji (Being-Time), often interpreted as suggesting the co-existence or interpenetration of past, present, and future 84, presents a potential, though conceptually distinct, point of comparison. While arising from vastly different frameworks—modern physics versus Zen metaphysics—the shared challenge to a simple, universally flowing linear present suggests that insights from seemingly disparate traditions might converge in unexpected ways when confronting the deep structure of time, complicating the straightforward linear versus cyclical dichotomy. ### C. Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Reality If Relativity reshaped our understanding of the large-scale structure of spacetime, Quantum Mechanics (QM), developed concurrently in the early 20th century, revolutionized our understanding of reality at the microscopic level, posing even deeper challenges to classical physics and traditional metaphysics. QM revealed a world governed by principles starkly contradicting everyday intuition and classical determinism. Key phenomena include the observer effect, where the act of measuring a quantum system inevitably disturbs it, influencing the outcome 98; wave-particle duality, where entities like electrons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties depending on how they are measured 98; the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which sets fundamental limits on the precision with which certain pairs of properties (like position and momentum) can be simultaneously known 98; and quantum entanglement, a phenomenon where two or more particles become linked in such a way that they share the same fate, instantaneously influencing each other regardless of the distance separating them, challenging notions of locality.98 The mathematical formalism of QM successfully predicts experimental results with extraordinary accuracy, but its interpretation—what it tells us about the nature of reality—remains deeply contested. The central puzzle is the measurement problem: how does a quantum system, described by a wavefunction representing a superposition of multiple possibilities, transition to a single definite outcome upon measurement? The Copenhagen interpretation, associated with Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, became the early dominant view.99 It posits that QM is intrinsically indeterministic, with probabilities governed by the Born rule. It emphasizes complementarity (pairs of properties like wave/particle nature cannot be simultaneously observed) and asserts that measurement causes an irreversible "collapse" of the wavefunction into one definite state.99 Critically, many Copenhagen proponents argued that QM doesn't describe the objective reality of the system itself, but rather provides a framework for predicting the results of measurements, which must be described in classical terms.99 Dissatisfaction with the seemingly arbitrary nature of wavefunction collapse and the special role assigned to measurement led to alternative interpretations. The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), pioneered by Hugh Everett III, proposes that the wavefunction never collapses.101 Instead, every possible outcome of a quantum measurement is physically realized, but in different, non-interacting parallel universes or "worlds." The universal wavefunction describes the entire multiverse, which evolves deterministically according to the Schrödinger equation, although observers within any single branch perceive randomness.101 Other interpretations, such as Bohmian mechanics (positing hidden variables and deterministic particle trajectories guided by the wavefunction) 98, also offer different ontological pictures. The philosophical implications of QM are profound. It fundamentally challenges classical notions of determinism, suggesting inherent randomness or probability at the heart of nature (in interpretations like Copenhagen).98 It questions the objectivity of reality, raising debates about whether properties exist independently of measurement and the potential role of the observer or even consciousness in shaping reality.98 Entanglement suggests a deep, non-local interconnectedness in the universe, challenging reductionist views.98 Quantum mechanics introduces a fundamental indeterminacy and context-dependence (measurement dependence) into our description of the physical world.98 This stands in direct opposition to the deterministic causality and observer-independent reality assumed not only by classical physics (Newtonian and, in many respects, Relativistic) but also by many traditional metaphysical systems, such as Spinoza's thoroughgoing necessitarianism.91 The probabilistic nature of quantum events and the indispensable role of the measurement context represent a radical break from the predictable, clockwork universe envisioned by earlier science and philosophy. The persistent disagreements among physicists and philosophers regarding the correct interpretation of QM (Copenhagen, MWI, Bohmian, etc.) 98 underscore a crucial point: even our most empirically successful scientific theories do not necessarily provide a single, unambiguous picture of the underlying reality. The mathematical formalism underdetermines the ontology.100 This leaves significant space for philosophical analysis and debate concerning the metaphysical implications of quantum physics, making the interpretation of QM a vital ongoing intersection of science and philosophy. ## VI. Contemporary Cosmology and the Frontiers of Metaphysics In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, cosmology and fundamental physics have continued to push the boundaries of understanding, generating models of the universe's origin, evolution, and ultimate nature that resonate deeply with, and often challenge, long-standing philosophical inquiries. Theories like the Big Bang, cyclic universes, string theory, and the multiverse engage directly with metaphysical questions about beginnings, endings, the nature of time, and the structure of reality itself. ### A. The Big Bang and its Philosophical Resonance The Big Bang theory stands as the standard, widely accepted cosmological model describing the evolution of the universe.102 It posits that the universe began approximately 13.8 billion years ago in an extremely hot, dense state and has been expanding and cooling ever since.102 Key observational pillars support this model: the redshift of distant galaxies indicating expansion (Hubble's Law), the existence and properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation (the afterglow of the hot early universe), and the observed abundances of light elements (hydrogen, helium, lithium) forged in the first few minutes (Big Bang Nucleosynthesis).102 An early period of extremely rapid expansion, known as cosmic inflation, is invoked to explain the observed large-scale uniformity and flatness of the universe.102 The initial concept was proposed by physicist and priest Georges Lemaître in the late 1920s and early 1930s as the "hypothesis of the primeval atom".103 While the Big Bang model successfully describes the universe's evolution from a very early state onwards, it raises profound questions about the absolute beginning. Extrapolating backwards leads to a singularity—a point of infinite density and temperature where the known laws of physics break down.102 Physics currently lacks a fully accepted theory (likely requiring a unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics) to describe this initial moment.103 This leaves the question "What caused the Big Bang?" or "What came before?" open to speculation. Proposed scenarios include the universe arising from quantum fluctuations in a pre-existing state, "emergent universe" models where the Bang arises from a quiescent past-eternal phase (echoing ancient "cosmic egg" myths), or models like the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal where spacetime is finite but has no beginning edge or singularity, making the universe potentially self-contained.103 The idea of a universe with a finite past (~13.8 billion years) inevitably resonates with philosophical and theological arguments about creation. It provides apparent empirical support for the premise of cosmological arguments like the Kalam argument, which contends that whatever begins to exist must have a cause, and since the universe began to exist, it must have a cause (often identified as God).70 The Big Bang narrative, depicting an origin from a singular point and the subsequent unfolding of cosmic history, can be seen as either aligning with or challenging traditional religious creation accounts, depending on interpretation.104 It forces engagement with questions about the very beginning of time itself.103 Thus, the Big Bang theory, while a product of scientific observation and mathematical modeling, paradoxically revitalizes ancient metaphysical and theological questions about ultimate origins and first causes.103 By describing how the universe evolved from an initial hot, dense state, it inevitably prompts the deeper philosophical questions of why there was such a state, what might have preceded it, or whether the concept of "before" even applies if time itself began then. This demonstrates a fascinating interplay where scientific cosmology intersects with, and potentially informs, domains traditionally belonging to metaphysics and theology.70 Furthermore, the presence of a singularity in the standard model signifies a critical limit to our current physical understanding.103 Such infinities often indicate the breakdown of a theory's applicability. This limitation highlights the incompleteness of current physics and serves as a powerful motivator for developing more fundamental theories, such as quantum gravity, or exploring alternative cosmological frameworks, including cyclic models, that might resolve or circumvent the initial singularity. ### B. Cyclic Universe Theories Revisited (Steinhardt-Turok, Penrose CCC) Dissatisfaction with aspects of the standard Big Bang model, including the initial singularity, the specific requirements of inflation, and the unexplained small value of dark energy (the cosmological constant), has spurred renewed interest in cyclic models of the universe.106 These contemporary theories propose that the Big Bang was not a unique beginning but part of an endless series of cosmic cycles. One prominent example is the ekpyrotic or cyclic model developed by Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok.106 This model, rooted in M-theory (an extension of string theory), envisions our universe as existing on one of two parallel "branes" (membrane-like objects) in a higher-dimensional space. These branes are proposed to collide periodically. Each collision triggers a hot, dense phase akin to a Big Bang, followed by a long period of expansion driven by dark energy (interpreted as a force between the branes). Eventually, the universe contracts towards a "Big Crunch," leading to another collision and the start of a new cycle.106 A key feature is that the universe undergoes a net expansion with each cycle, allowing entropy to increase over time without leading to a thermodynamic "heat death," a problem that plagued earlier oscillating universe models.106 This model relies on specific theoretical assumptions, including the nature of dark energy and the dynamics of branes.106 Another variant, proposed by Lauris Baum and Paul Frampton, utilizes the concept of "phantom energy" to drive the cycles.106 A different approach is offered by Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC).107 CCC posits that the universe undergoes infinite "aeons" of expansion. Within each aeon, the universe expands until, in the very distant future, all massive particles decay, black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation, and the cosmos becomes dominated by radiation (photons).107 In this state, Penrose argues, the universe loses its sense of scale (time and distance become meaningless without massive particles). Through a mathematical technique called conformal rescaling (stretching/shrinking geometry while preserving angles), the infinitely expanded, empty future of one aeon can be smoothly mapped onto the hot, dense, conformally invariant state of the Big Bang of the next aeon.107 The low entropy state of the Big Bang is explained by requiring the Weyl curvature (a measure of spacetime distortion) to be zero at the transition, satisfying the Weyl curvature hypothesis.107 Penrose and collaborators have claimed to find supporting observational evidence in the form of anomalous circular patterns ("Hawking points," remnants of black hole evaporation from the previous aeon) in the CMB data, although these claims are highly controversial and disputed by other cosmologists who argue the patterns are consistent with standard inflationary cosmology.107 CCC requires speculative physics, such as the eventual decay of all massive particles, including protons and electrons.107 These modern cyclic models represent a remarkable convergence of highly speculative, cutting-edge theoretical physics (M-theory, branes, conformal geometry, particle decay) with one of the most ancient philosophical intuitions about the nature of time.106 They demonstrate that the fundamental debate between linear and cyclical conceptions of cosmic history persists not just in philosophy and religion, but within the frontiers of contemporary scientific cosmology itself, offering scientifically grounded alternatives to the standard linear Big Bang narrative. It is also important to note the diversity within these non-standard approaches. While both Steinhardt-Turok and Penrose propose endless cycles, their proposed mechanisms differ fundamentally. The Steinhardt-Turok model involves cycles of expansion and contraction driven by brane collisions 106, whereas Penrose's CCC involves continuous expansion within each aeon, connected via conformal mapping and relying on the eventual decay of all mass.107 This highlights that even among those exploring cyclic alternatives, there is no single agreed-upon framework, reflecting the speculative and evolving nature of these cosmological ideas. ### C. String Theory, Multiverses, and the Boundaries of Physical Reality String theory emerged as a leading candidate for a theory of quantum gravity, aiming to unify general relativity with quantum mechanics and provide a consistent description of physics at the smallest scales.110 Its fundamental premise is that the elementary constituents of reality are not point-like particles but tiny, vibrating one-dimensional strings.110 Different vibrational modes of these strings correspond to different particles (electrons, photons, gravitons, etc.). String theory naturally incorporates gravity (a closed string vibration corresponds to the graviton) and holds the promise of resolving the infinities that plague attempts to quantize gravity using standard quantum field theory techniques.110 However, it requires extra spatial dimensions (typically 10 or 11 total spacetime dimensions) beyond the familiar three space and one time dimension, and often invokes supersymmetry (a hypothesized symmetry between fermions and bosons).110 The theory also features "dualities," surprising equivalences between seemingly different versions of the theory, which some physicists interpret as suggesting a non-reductionist picture where fundamental constituents are context-dependent.110 One of the most striking, and controversial, implications arising from string theory, as well as from models of cosmic inflation, is the concept of the multiverse.111 String theory appears to allow for a vast number of possible solutions, or "vacua," each corresponding to a universe with different physical laws, constants, and particle content—often referred to as the "string theory landscape".111 Similarly, the theory of eternal inflation suggests that our Big Bang was just one bubble nucleation event in a larger, eternally inflating spacetime, with other bubbles potentially forming universes with different properties.111 These ideas lead to various multiverse hypotheses, such as Max Tegmark's hierarchy of multiverses or the "quilted multiverse" where infinite space necessitates the repetition of all possible configurations.111 This is distinct from, though sometimes conflated with, the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, which posits diverging worlds based on quantum choices.101 The philosophical implications of string theory and multiverse scenarios are immense and hotly debated. A major concern is their scientific status: since these other universes are, by definition, causally disconnected from ours (or interactions are negligible), hypotheses about them seem inherently untestable and unfalsifiable, potentially moving them from the realm of physics into metaphysics.111 Proponents argue they are natural consequences of our best physical theories (inflation, string theory) and may offer explanations for otherwise mysterious features of our universe, such as the apparent fine-tuning of physical constants for life.111 The multiverse provides a potential anthropic explanation: if countless universes exist with varying constants, it's unsurprising that we find ourselves in one whose constants permit life to arise.111 However, critics argue this weakens the explanatory power of physics. Furthermore, the idea of infinite universes, potentially containing infinite copies of ourselves making different choices, raises profound questions about personal identity, uniqueness, causality, and free will.111 These highly speculative theories push physics to its conceptual limits, blurring the traditional boundary between empirical science and metaphysical inquiry.111 In attempting to formulate a "theory of everything" or explain cosmic origins and fine-tuning, physicists find themselves grappling with questions about the nature of reality, the necessity of physical laws, and the limits of observation—domains previously explored primarily through philosophical reasoning. Whether string theory and multiverse hypotheses represent the future of physics or a detour into untestable speculation remains an open question. The possibility of multiple universes, each potentially governed by different fundamental laws and constants, represents a radical departure from the traditional scientific and philosophical quest for the single, necessary set of laws governing the universe.111 If our universe is just one instance among a vast ensemble of possibilities, our understanding of reality becomes fundamentally relativized. The laws we observe might be merely contingent features of our local cosmic patch, rather than universal necessities. This perspective challenges deeply ingrained assumptions about the uniqueness and inherent order of our cosmos, opening up new and unsettling philosophical vistas.112 ### D. Philosophical Responses to Modern Physics East and West (e.g., Kyoto School) The counter-intuitive discoveries of modern physics—Relativity's merging of space and time, QM's indeterminacy and entanglement, cosmology's expanding universe and multiverse speculations—have inevitably spurred philosophical reflection and re-evaluation across traditions. In the West, the Einstein-Bergson debate 97 and the ongoing controversies over QM interpretation 98 exemplify direct engagement with the philosophical implications of these new scientific paradigms. In the East, and in comparative philosophy, modern physics has also prompted new dialogues and attempts at synthesis. The Kyoto School, a significant movement in 20th-century Japanese philosophy, notably sought to bridge Western philosophical methods (particularly phenomenology and existentialism) with insights from East Asian traditions, primarily Zen Buddhism.85 Its founder, Nishida Kitarō (1870-1945), developed concepts like the "logic of basho" (place or topos) and "absolute nothingness" (zettai-mu).85 Nishida aimed to overcome the subject-object dichotomy he saw as limiting Western logic (particularly Aristotelian predicate logic).85 His "logic of basho" describes reality as a dynamic field where the individual self arises contingently within a fundamental ground of "nothingness"—a concept deeply informed by Zen's understanding of emptiness (sunyata) and interconnectedness (related to dependent origination).84 Nishida and his followers saw resonances between these Eastern concepts and the field-theoretic, relational, and non-substantial aspects suggested by modern physics.84 Similarly, the 13th-century Zen master Dōgen's notion of "Being-Time" (Uji), suggesting the inseparability and co-presence of being and time, past and future 84, has been invoked by some comparative philosophers exploring parallels with relativistic spacetime or non-linear temporal concepts. Earlier, Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) had famously integrated ideas from the Upanishads and Buddhism into his own pessimistic metaphysics, #### Works cited 1. Comparative Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/comparative-philosophy/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/comparative-philosophy/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857047277%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3e8UGk6kHkkKQtiiRubYdT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857166971&usg=AOvVaw0KTADoqMpvriIhhedlvx8q) 2. Philosophy East and West: A Quarterly of Comparative Philosophy - UH Press, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/pew/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/pew/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857047617%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1iDBTlpPOMT6TRdmPbj2Rz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857167395&usg=AOvVaw0bvQ1wTp40wniggmnXgll4) 3. Enuma elish | Summary, Characters, Creation Story, & Facts | Britannica, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/topic/Enuma-Elish](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/Enuma-Elish%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857047889%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw08AYNQg-IfoUY-3N1nT9rd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857167548&usg=AOvVaw14QDAesMZtKlEPvqnCVGFN) 4. Enuma Elish: "When on High . . ." The Mesopotamian/Babylonian Creation Myth, accessed April 13, 2025, [http://www.crivoice.org/enumaelish.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://www.crivoice.org/enumaelish.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857048146%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2ddX8lg32mVhbXwdegKGHZ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857167687&usg=AOvVaw0nGxEr-H_jB-FnbXGAkngF) 5. Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.worldhistory.org/article/225/enuma-elish---the-babylonian-epic-of-creation---fu/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldhistory.org/article/225/enuma-elish---the-babylonian-epic-of-creation---fu/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857048537%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw09NA2RRW4pVLcRhy5zKm0Y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857167821&usg=AOvVaw2veve8SBGvHclVn6swP5RZ) 6. Section 10.1: Mesopotamian Literature, Part 1 (Enuma Elish), accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ane/lectures/10.1.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ane/lectures/10.1.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857048811%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0knlzNvqwFFfF-ySf3TQgG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857167975&usg=AOvVaw0HDFZY9T4N_BkAxP_lrpoy) 7. Ancient Egyptian religion - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_religion](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_religion%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857049055%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw19HqxAWdTOweyuOw9scGmg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168137&usg=AOvVaw0SVYTf9inGZsj3VhGVMSeJ) 8. Ancient Egyptian Religion Unit 2 – Ancient Egyptian Cosmology and Creation - Fiveable, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/gods-graves-and-pyramids-ancient-egyptian-religion-and-ritual/unit-2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/gods-graves-and-pyramids-ancient-egyptian-religion-and-ritual/unit-2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857049440%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1SZ-GCGmjvtsCk4CtTCIo4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168273&usg=AOvVaw32o9hfgMXsTbjOGPszQeNl) 9. Mythology in Ancient Egypt - Crystalinks, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.crystalinks.com/egyptmythology.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.crystalinks.com/egyptmythology.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857049711%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw25zPKPFRRyy26TLodSuF2b&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168402&usg=AOvVaw3VLCUEyB0FZ8f1yJS3EsV5) 10. Egyptian mythology - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_mythology](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_mythology%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857049980%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw07QxQcmUWYXDwU1GUAAhKu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168527&usg=AOvVaw1POgP0qiXKxAUYIRQKsFvZ) 11. Ancient Egypt, an introduction (article) - Khan Academy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/ancient-mediterranean-ap/ancient-egypt-ap/a/ancient-egypt-an-introduction](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/ancient-mediterranean-ap/ancient-egypt-ap/a/ancient-egypt-an-introduction%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857050357%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2WN_VjVWPQx-MpupyS3dz0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168661&usg=AOvVaw23iTohorK4r_6lqMfh57a3) 12. The Vedas: Foundations of Indian Metaphysical Thought ..., accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/vedas-indian-metaphysical-thought-foundations/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/vedas-indian-metaphysical-thought-foundations/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857050682%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw27zgZptq_XaCBZ3u3ANFWa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168812&usg=AOvVaw2imn4kLkFWAm5fvvnx5U9F) 13. Vedic Cosmology and Philosophy: An Exploration - India's Biggest Dashakarma Bhandar, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.poojn.in/post/22782/vedic-cosmology-and-philosophy-an-exploration](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.poojn.in/post/22782/vedic-cosmology-and-philosophy-an-exploration%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857051008%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2SUgmp6KFkfRfBcr3XZSGD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857168954&usg=AOvVaw2xwV3hkm7OvpRY2TJUnUSg) 14. Hindu cosmology and time travel: Ancient wisdom meets modern science, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.hinduamerican.org/blog/hindu-cosmology-and-time-travel-ancient-wisdom-meets-modern-science](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.hinduamerican.org/blog/hindu-cosmology-and-time-travel-ancient-wisdom-meets-modern-science%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857051356%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw39U76PIWXSCQc6eKhxwo_R&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169096&usg=AOvVaw0Q2bCCFccVqC5Hhc_xHCQb) 15. Saṃsāra - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/samsara](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/samsara%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857051569%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1nFlVlv4zLJhx83dC98nBV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169228&usg=AOvVaw3SEtWEdpTqlh9fSVioDPp_) 16. Deciphering Taoist Concepts and Symbols: The Yin Yang and ..., accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philosophy.institute/religions-of-the-world/taoist-concepts-yin-yang-symbols/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philosophy.institute/religions-of-the-world/taoist-concepts-yin-yang-symbols/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857051959%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2PijWNN5zmUiCV4KDriFVR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169383&usg=AOvVaw1ua9aTZa9l4DJMPEsibUGa) 17. Tao - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857052215%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0ZKA5IdrzXFGydVsWKguDC&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169516&usg=AOvVaw1Xep92ELoL_0TmS3DTPnLm) 18. Taoist Philosophy - Curious Ordinary, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.curiousordinary.com/2018/11/taoist-philosophy.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.curiousordinary.com/2018/11/taoist-philosophy.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857052471%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1oknLjrHyQXtIKXiK0nYry&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169663&usg=AOvVaw3CrrupTKoOyazbc3uK9BS7) 19. The Chinese Cosmos: Basic Concepts - Asia for Educators - Columbia University, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/cosmos/bgov/cosmos.htm](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://afe.easia.columbia.edu/cosmos/bgov/cosmos.htm%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857052735%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2De0MHhA-vHr_KrxbNN-V7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169801&usg=AOvVaw3Z6ySiS9a5jKM9fCI5sseL) 20. The Chinese View on Time – A Reflection on The Concept of Time in Dao/Yijing And Modern Science - Article (v2) by David Leong | Qeios, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.qeios.com/read/V014JA.2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.qeios.com/read/V014JA.2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857053080%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1wZqby8m7KarkudesEX2pp&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857169941&usg=AOvVaw2EmnXLI0rpSZeWMotTvDgR) 21. Deviant Origins: Hesiodic Theogony and the Orphica - Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=classics_pubs](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D1122%2526context%253Dclassics_pubs%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857053435%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0SZuG_lC1b8Bu1UUesVJcG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170101&usg=AOvVaw0oDAAwKh-v6SQrAPH6cgMC) 22. Early Greek cosmology - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Greek_cosmology](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Greek_cosmology%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857053712%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw10i4YqvDOyDaANrfiKw5zJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170248&usg=AOvVaw2D5PL95PPWLpFG38WLVgT2) 23. Greek Creation Myths: 3 Traditions (Hesiod, Homer & Orphism) - TheCollector, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.thecollector.com/greek-creation-myths/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.thecollector.com/greek-creation-myths/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857053995%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3n6v2H_P4Jte_vRw5hOhJZ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170385&usg=AOvVaw0J0nkzwRMUcS7g6-wm5UV3) 24. Dualism | Definition, Religion, Examples, Significance, & Facts ..., accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/topic/dualism-religion](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/dualism-religion%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857054360%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1_tvj7kB88NHArGtmSWzPB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170518&usg=AOvVaw3CKEQh9UtLZK3iH35JyZHK) 25. Golden Age - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Age](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Age%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857054667%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw29d0rlJA5uOwfywnFIacUl&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170642&usg=AOvVaw2PXsQCfZMCeDmjobs0XzQG) 26. Pre-Socratic philosophy - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Socratic_philosophy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Socratic_philosophy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857054982%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3R8FY4Ruu8unjjvsyDd9Gz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170770&usg=AOvVaw2KQMmFYsIeEYVYa0Dj189E) 27. Pre-Socratic philosophy | Ancient Mediterranean World Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/the-ancient-mediterranean-world/unit-11/pre-socratic-philosophy/study-guide/ptP7T4BxoD0mHfFw](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/the-ancient-mediterranean-world/unit-11/pre-socratic-philosophy/study-guide/ptP7T4BxoD0mHfFw%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857055408%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2z1JHi2ckL_H-CcoavgfxA&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857170911&usg=AOvVaw14ICKczPFqEmYtJJj93KZO) 28. The Presocratics | Daily Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://daily-philosophy.com/the-presocratics-overview/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://daily-philosophy.com/the-presocratics-overview/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857055729%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2cb4KNjdSMWz1YimCCHo-v&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171056&usg=AOvVaw3eO-fCUzx_BGb29Rs1iktV) 29. 1.1: Pre-Socratic Philosophers | Introduction to Philosophy: Hymowech - Lumen Learning, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-fmcc-philosophy1/chapter/1-13-pre-socratic-philosophers/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-fmcc-philosophy1/chapter/1-13-pre-socratic-philosophers/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857056105%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw23VmEjkfPwOkSHc6I8N2__&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171204&usg=AOvVaw18n7OVXPg1ohBQ2n2TCHaS) 30. Theory of forms - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_forms](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_forms%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857056349%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3My7twcYs1g0f_vGbkRfxz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171342&usg=AOvVaw39F5VJZlsUiPoyJi9OMULM) 31. What Is Plato's Theory of Forms? - TheCollector, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.thecollector.com/what-is-plato-theory-of-forms/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.thecollector.com/what-is-plato-theory-of-forms/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857056660%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0z8sqR4FSNTmwBeaVgG-rX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171474&usg=AOvVaw1tqLPtfLJJRKdHSn0kGY-L) 32. Plato | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/plato/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/plato/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857056903%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1BcrvvCeCMpgUXRGvFTgcx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171604&usg=AOvVaw2G-JySw9cPHNHoIUXitVWr) 33. Dualism and Mind | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/dualism-and-mind/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/dualism-and-mind/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857057144%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0Lf-eGHf4Zb2bSaG0tsR9v&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171729&usg=AOvVaw0w7XoO-QpGvLDpJ4xYsXQq) 34. ‍♀️History of Ancient Philosophy Unit 7 – Aristotle's Metaphysics: The Four Causes, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/history-ancient-philosophy/unit-7](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/history-ancient-philosophy/unit-7%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857057504%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2w6g7o5JddjYAQRM8Yu3tC&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171859&usg=AOvVaw0vVaUVqCpSpydjDjCU7trL) 35. Aristotle: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-metaphysics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-metaphysics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857057777%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LfaJuKA4Qnll-DqJRauMv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857171996&usg=AOvVaw1Zk0q-kGyAdn2iBL-pGglX) 36. Metaphysics - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857057992%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw22YJynszTFlJLufZUsnCnL&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172129&usg=AOvVaw3ugBBhG5XsK4h-mg_RAWLq) 37. Metaphysics (Aristotle) - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics_(Aristotle)](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics_\(Aristotle\)%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857058242%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3R9SzguquKdYS4sDKCZhU1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172261&usg=AOvVaw20d_YvzuO9wG7Q_NCJRBZa) 38. Substance | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/substance/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/substance/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857058508%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0bBib5HVILINHFimdH8RBF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172397&usg=AOvVaw3MvETXobv-DyOpVTN4jc64) 39. Aristotle: Substance, Essence, and the Actuality of Being ..., accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/aristotle-substance-essence-actuality-being/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/aristotle-substance-essence-actuality-being/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857058952%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3dF2nfgzMKjVjJvNrRoDFM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172535&usg=AOvVaw2S9HhqAyNliMAzkOyF3xz9) 40. Aquinas: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/thomas-aquinas-metaphysics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/thomas-aquinas-metaphysics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857059324%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Pe6EK36gfA7DEqFFWe3I0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172675&usg=AOvVaw0V-wuoeooxO-o3JUGs5dr9) 41. Aquinas: The Synthesis of Christian Doctrine and Aristotelian Metaphysics, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/aquinas-christian-doctrine-aristotelian-metaphysics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/aquinas-christian-doctrine-aristotelian-metaphysics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857059702%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0FIAJ9l2IMlFu69hYtlYJx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172818&usg=AOvVaw0mTWd3DNZA8qzRSB7O7S76) 42. Potentiality and actuality - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentiality_and_actuality](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentiality_and_actuality%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857059963%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0sdYVb4Fo35J3WRL2en1NF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857172958&usg=AOvVaw0xm90Krbu8CxkuFzmDmR2X) 43. philosophy.institute, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/origins-metaphysics-tracing-roots/#:~:text=Andronicus%2C%20when%20compiling%20Aristotle's%20writings,such%20as%20the%20nature%20of](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/origins-metaphysics-tracing-roots/%2523:~:text%253DAndronicus%25252C%252520when%252520compiling%252520Aristotle%26%2339;s%252520writings,such%252520as%252520the%252520nature%252520of%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857060433%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1J5_ooIQAm4YD2-MRNgK0r&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173129&usg=AOvVaw3M3JcPT-czWMq9eVflkFtT) 44. The History of Metaphysics - The Metaphysicist, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://metaphysicist.com/history/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://metaphysicist.com/history/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857060686%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0epzx-SjMiD8sVeWkFQtuM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173292&usg=AOvVaw3NlR8ZRvQiRFpnWSDnf41W) 45. Nagarjuna | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857060962%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1WKQuR5b8PLfbo42qmR2Il&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173420&usg=AOvVaw0GM7AUDGiIZHBY3Q4dbRVs) 46. Nagarjuna – Sunyata - Buddhism: The Way of Emptiness, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://buddhism-thewayofemptiness.blog.nomagic.uk/nagarjuna-sunyata/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://buddhism-thewayofemptiness.blog.nomagic.uk/nagarjuna-sunyata/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857061300%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1zj9gwhqMQv2NqIWhBmlAo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173551&usg=AOvVaw2Gn6pZetNYGjLr3-7m_y53) 47. Nāgārjuna - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nagarjuna/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nagarjuna/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857061564%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1rKP1idd3hJs6zvlLeyuxL&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173687&usg=AOvVaw387mStQhGQEqRAyOfc3dyc) 48. Śūnyatā - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9A%C5%ABnyat%C4%81](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%2525C5%25259A%2525C5%2525ABnyat%2525C4%252581%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857061851%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3KexUzoCnitk7VElJ0sQeU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173819&usg=AOvVaw3Hyke-5RaQ_TkaiSnHl1P8) 49. Pratītyasamutpāda - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prat%C4%ABtyasamutp%C4%81da](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prat%2525C4%2525ABtyasamutp%2525C4%252581da%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857062136%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2eqiFaeWIyLQykf--vSiyG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857173954&usg=AOvVaw2hLKMDdotPBHuvClv1uxqO) 50. What is dependent origination? - Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/dependent-origination/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/dependent-origination/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857062431%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2mqToTOrju4gZPda5OQlU1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174111&usg=AOvVaw120A1b28z-QCDNsYjx_5wx) 51. Pratītyasamutpāda: The Buddhist Concept of Dependent Origination - HD Asian Art, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.hdasianart.com/blogs/news/pratityasamutpada-the-buddhist-concept-of-dependent-origination](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.hdasianart.com/blogs/news/pratityasamutpada-the-buddhist-concept-of-dependent-origination%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857062810%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0hj3vzCWJwVLA5D7Hcm9_i&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174251&usg=AOvVaw1fYRZxkwmP7RwxUrqQRL-m) 52. Dependent Origination - Barre Center for Buddhist Studies, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.buddhistinquiry.org/article/dependent-origination/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.buddhistinquiry.org/article/dependent-origination/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857063071%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3x0AxaSd8o0J8U-Ps6x8q7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174405&usg=AOvVaw2P6IHsZCs_sEc0pmby72VP) 53. Mādhyamika | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/madhyamika](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/madhyamika%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857063360%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LMzH4kzj5DZnXFjlZnMoi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174535&usg=AOvVaw06p1xub6zkvcs6XnOazuX_) 54. 5.4. The Chain of Dependent Origination (Pratityasamutpada) - Boeddha-beelden.com, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.boeddha-beelden.com/en/kennisbank/boeddhisme/5-boeddhistische-filosofie-en-ethiek/5-4-de-keten-van-afhankelijk-ontstaan-pratityasamutpada/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.boeddha-beelden.com/en/kennisbank/boeddhisme/5-boeddhistische-filosofie-en-ethiek/5-4-de-keten-van-afhankelijk-ontstaan-pratityasamutpada/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857063802%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ijhwKBCod2CpUzgNUAvsw&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174681&usg=AOvVaw3-rnhRdQrcso2J1vFalOiY) 55. Alaya-vijnana | Mind-Only, Consciousness & Yogacara | Britannica, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/topic/alaya-vijnana](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/alaya-vijnana%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857064086%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1hMynN7GXH3cyVgE-4xJVJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174829&usg=AOvVaw2xc0JqXXtjuO2rIU15JoH0) 56. Yogachara - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogachara](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogachara%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857064338%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3_Te7XElczjA1JKqwUgLyt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857174951&usg=AOvVaw2Ra0ZCymVtlHer6wFtURo1) 57. Yogācāra - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/yogacara/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/yogacara/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857064667%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw23x0AvAhnp5xg8EQCsl6m7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175089&usg=AOvVaw2x395wOpk0MVR3-g3g3bRE) 58. Yogacara school and the theory of consciousness | Indian Philosophy Class Notes | Fiveable, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://library.fiveable.me/indian-philosophy/unit-9/yogacara-school-theory-consciousness/study-guide/aEFWajGrFizwAHse](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://library.fiveable.me/indian-philosophy/unit-9/yogacara-school-theory-consciousness/study-guide/aEFWajGrFizwAHse%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857065085%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0KZX2AhMQ98SV3P0TUNQ6q&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175228&usg=AOvVaw2FTlqx-Pb3Zj5Iyp8CAcWR) 59. Eschatology - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschatology](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschatology%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857065391%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1w7vkBFoG7IpEsRPb1mwTa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175365&usg=AOvVaw21tyEuKHARrVnwuyaNawjR) 60. Time - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857065653%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1yx2UxF3ooOYtVwIhlQiYw&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175484&usg=AOvVaw0GHCeHTflZVWrMui5I0nfl) 61. A brief history of (linear) time - Big Think, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://bigthink.com/thinking/a-brief-history-of-linear-time/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://bigthink.com/thinking/a-brief-history-of-linear-time/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857065929%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VXRpLpSiibXM82SRnMwaa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175609&usg=AOvVaw1NRCmLR-cMAk4l5IyPNRCN) 62. The City of God, Understanding Time and History - School of Mary, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://schoolofmary.org/2024/07/22/the-city-of-god-understanding-time-and-history/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://schoolofmary.org/2024/07/22/the-city-of-god-understanding-time-and-history/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857066238%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0rB7cdFo22JawUQYQZ46iK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175746&usg=AOvVaw0lY_9HUpo0d7JrXl_4QwGw) 63. The Concept of History and the Concept of Time in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.bafid.fau.eu/files/2021/05/history-and-time_eng_ne.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.bafid.fau.eu/files/2021/05/history-and-time_eng_ne.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857066601%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0VTDB_2AMFPrGDuIG80bk_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857175888&usg=AOvVaw2zY5XqzvX7e8hDugpl4Z_Z) 64. Time - Cyclic, Philosophy, History | Britannica, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/science/time/Cyclic-view-of-time-in-the-philosophy-of-history](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/science/time/Cyclic-view-of-time-in-the-philosophy-of-history%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857066987%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3nrjCWGZ2nELD7HtlopYw1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176023&usg=AOvVaw0rurY2CTeucqEfuCFNBuij) 65. (PDF) Cyclical and Linear Progress in History: A Comparative Analysis of Ibn Khaldun, Hegel, and Toynbee - ResearchGate, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387312196_Cyclical_and_Linear_Progress_in_History_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Ibn_Khaldun_Hegel_and_Toynbee](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/387312196_Cyclical_and_Linear_Progress_in_History_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Ibn_Khaldun_Hegel_and_Toynbee%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857067645%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1w2xif2OvqKnZiFXTuVRsh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176183&usg=AOvVaw3oebio4b532wLGXMiNP79V) 66. How the Christian view of time led to modern science, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://sixdayscience.com/2014/05/30/time/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://sixdayscience.com/2014/05/30/time/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857067928%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qZDo7UtoVddZfVtDuqRZ5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176328&usg=AOvVaw0N2WER9g-uV59rlMUFwgLo) 67. The Perspective on Time – Is It Linear or Cyclical?, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.theperspective.com/debates/living/perspective-time-linear-cyclical](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.theperspective.com/debates/living/perspective-time-linear-cyclical%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857068226%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0w1sQxmRaiwngJjsWNtN1W&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176457&usg=AOvVaw0bdWjgwC1zUznKqLs9cdL9) 68. How We Perceive Time? Cyclical vs Linear vs Vertical (the philosophy of time perception), accessed April 13, 2025, [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eaXCvA08J44&pp=ugMICgJqYRABGAE%3D](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v%253DeaXCvA08J44%2526pp%253DugMICgJqYRABGAE%25253D%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857068555%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1Vf2eCFlo55o12axxXHWQZ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176598&usg=AOvVaw0aQ5I77JpgAix_K4A3jNO_) 69. Scholasticism - Medieval, Philosophy, Theology | Britannica, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/topic/Scholasticism/Enduring-features](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/Scholasticism/Enduring-features%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857068852%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1v7t8iiXwapQF7QyqBnAob&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176736&usg=AOvVaw1IUmvONYw3q1I4BjwIZ6Gq) 70. Cosmological argument - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857069108%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0RmF8ocTzFhYBLyqVClh6V&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176863&usg=AOvVaw3KugPsH-iDfgA4ety9xkk8) 71. Renaissance philosophy | History, Philosophers, Political Philosophy, Humanism, & Philosophy of Nature | Britannica, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.britannica.com/topic/Renaissance-philosophy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/Renaissance-philosophy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857069434%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2iMTJ64fWblMpAaVTferQ1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857176998&usg=AOvVaw3VUFFHkg4l97RV3CtDb1EU) 72. History of philosophy - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_philosophy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_philosophy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857069683%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3OrlaqySZKoTxxfLSXMuJX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177131&usg=AOvVaw0S3jIV7QUsFCMbJvCHzJni) 73. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Pico_della_Mirandola](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Pico_della_Mirandola%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857069953%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw08Jlqi-bWpq4wOXVCP9NYx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177259&usg=AOvVaw3o3Lr2rmH3G--9aH_ee1Pm) 74. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/fall2021/entries/pico-della-mirandola/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/fall2021/entries/pico-della-mirandola/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857070291%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3PpY25tCz9_nn-oQh8DH7y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177391&usg=AOvVaw2KxZmYxQVSS3HFtm1qEgyl) 75. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed April 13, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pico-della-mirandola/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pico-della-mirandola/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857070630%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2GgFk85E3zDAaSY02fL9eN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177527&usg=AOvVaw3TsiCdir6d-nYU3wiCvw-l) 76. Pico della Mirandola: Oration on the Dignity of Man, accessed April 13, 2025, [http://courses.washington.edu/hsteu401/Pico.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://courses.washington.edu/hsteu401/Pico.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857070960%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1njOpNjvEjiKDEdptOu01k&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177659&usg=AOvVaw3EbAC124w1SMjHXwE21Dp4) 77. Influence of Renaissance Humanism and Skepticism on Martin Luther | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-264?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780199340378.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780199340378-e-264&p=emailAAA0q494pdI.E](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-264?d%253D/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-264%2526p%253DemailAAA0q494pdI.E%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857071573%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2u6gPFuMq0wj8ecTw4NAtA&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177808&usg=AOvVaw1lhcFMALFoT51CaWPMDqOq) 78. Modern Chinese Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/modern-chinese-philosophy/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/modern-chinese-philosophy/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857071864%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1CzxfLS5xt4sdtDXjzXHL-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857177962&usg=AOvVaw3HocLM8lUvW0japqAZ9UUC) 79. Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs) THE IDENTIFICATION OF MIND AND PRINCIPLE By Wang Yangming Introduction “Neo- - Asia for Educators, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/cup/wang_yangming_mind_principle.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/cup/wang_yangming_mind_principle.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857072347%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2i86ZxqPo3l63b7Xfmg3KQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178117&usg=AOvVaw0aFQSJVRkDv7cJn8BMZrWz) 80. Neo-Confucian Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/neo-confucian-philosophy/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/neo-confucian-philosophy/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857072685%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2cbUNECo1qMjQWS7SHrYGb&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178244&usg=AOvVaw3PPucYuXd9uT9Rn-_GLe-j) 81. Wang Yang Ming and Neo Confucianism Flashcards - Quizlet, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://quizlet.com/172708044/wang-yang-ming-and-neo-confucianism-flash-cards/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://quizlet.com/172708044/wang-yang-ming-and-neo-confucianism-flash-cards/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857073041%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3_EUcM7ztz13hwzlgzqSwV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178373&usg=AOvVaw00RhB3cF11F5D2HOO6r9cU) 82. Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality - JeeLoo Liu, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://jeelooliu.net/Neo-Confucianism_TOC.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://jeelooliu.net/Neo-Confucianism_TOC.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857073476%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0-X6BV5CFaNjBWvtCHVKV7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178505&usg=AOvVaw0mGYFVrXuO4linDecxgPbb) 83. Research on the Development of Eastern Social Thought and Philosophy - Atlantis Press, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125996219.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125996219.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857073820%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1RYzpJpy_dHOjCAH5FhEX0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178635&usg=AOvVaw2Z2c5XMaScWpJ3TaHTFU12) 84. (PDF) Being-Time, or How Traditional Japanese Thought Collided with Western Philosophy and Modern Physics at Hiroshima - ResearchGate, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384459529_Being-Time_or_How_Traditional_Japanese_Thought_Collided_with_Western_Philosophy_and_Modern_Physics_at_Hiroshima](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/384459529_Being-Time_or_How_Traditional_Japanese_Thought_Collided_with_Western_Philosophy_and_Modern_Physics_at_Hiroshima%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857074642%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0n4_r-wMgsYHAZxsAznzr-&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178782&usg=AOvVaw0-vnhoF1k_UZJqwlHxG0Qj) 85. Kitaro Nishida - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitaro_Nishida](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitaro_Nishida%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857074917%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2zDiDCEJpGV5C2VGLwUTMd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857178922&usg=AOvVaw123iLNbHaiQwMxCP916Zk8) 86. EMPTINESS IS 'I' - The Kyoto School of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://thekyotoschoolofphilosophy.wordpress.com/emptiness-is-i/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://thekyotoschoolofphilosophy.wordpress.com/emptiness-is-i/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857075243%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0tJmaX9nYqOH_Wcm3ipZkt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179045&usg=AOvVaw0ImldzvPR3uhpq0kKgi2Fw) 87. Nishida Kitaro (1870-1945) - Buddhism: The Way of Emptiness, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://buddhism-thewayofemptiness.blog.nomagic.uk/nishida-kitaro-1870-1945/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://buddhism-thewayofemptiness.blog.nomagic.uk/nishida-kitaro-1870-1945/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857075673%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0akKt5tUipkrlulzNF-wM4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179187&usg=AOvVaw1PiTxz0t13x3GEJsP5oUrH) 88. Eastern esotericism - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_esotericism](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_esotericism%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857075955%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2GtKaF1LUlte2LyKHX_G6p&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179317&usg=AOvVaw1FxoLgEz3qGfj9eaZOHSQ-) 89. Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial theory, India and 'the mystic East', accessed April 13, 2025, [https://foldxx.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/orientalism-and-religion-post-colonial-theory-india-and-the-mystic-east.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://foldxx.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/orientalism-and-religion-post-colonial-theory-india-and-the-mystic-east.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857076446%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3vDeaAM486TOtA5r-wM18H&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179458&usg=AOvVaw2p_4zwuKQmdEjHW2hP-sov) 90. Enlightenment (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed April 13, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857076724%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3S1qwVDWmqNy1n3P37IDin&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179602&usg=AOvVaw2ZtkjsUR6U62k5VkFO3MvV) 91. Spinoza, Benedict de: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of ..., accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/spinoz-m/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/spinoz-m/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857077113%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2UhrSxAtoL1Cm2QyqngnKy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179728&usg=AOvVaw3IxsEpxXGGRSsiGpTvHEoB) 92. Spinoza's Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance-Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication - PhilArchive, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philarchive.org/archive/MELSMO-6](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philarchive.org/archive/MELSMO-6%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857077479%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0BJFpTEdxYde6qvQ6gw_zb&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857179872&usg=AOvVaw1XmeE0yYbUTb3q6Se9JdU0) 93. Kant, Immanuel: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857077768%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1aU_8shp_EMW7_zxiaYtC5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180005&usg=AOvVaw1HzSMFVGxf2pfPGNL-XAX-) 94. Philosophy of space and time - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_space_and_time](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_space_and_time%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857078041%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3h4pRxW_3z224j-wEAzEVc&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180137&usg=AOvVaw0H_hSISIOrbHhrF3WYQENq) 95. Time | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/time/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/time/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857078293%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1dSokTw1r_hs9bHEl0Oc-_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180291&usg=AOvVaw3giYPnFxvB8cPfcrvmyl-R) 96. EINSTEIN: PHILOSOPHICAL IDEAS - UBC Physics & Astronomy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://phas.ubc.ca/~stamp/TEACHING/PHYS340/NOTES/FILES/Einstein_philosophical_ideas.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://phas.ubc.ca/~stamp/TEACHING/PHYS340/NOTES/FILES/Einstein_philosophical_ideas.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857078620%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3t1YK0_8_cpaCnCxcSz2YA&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180423&usg=AOvVaw1GTr0hbUbp9pN-tWCFO6QU) 97. Who really won when Bergson and Einstein debated time? | Aeon Essays, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://aeon.co/essays/who-really-won-when-bergson-and-einstein-debated-time](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://aeon.co/essays/who-really-won-when-bergson-and-einstein-debated-time%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857078983%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3fStp2ykOs4owvA4kpxzDZ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180564&usg=AOvVaw1i8z8oHAG8ZlTmQ-VualVT) 98. Philosophical Inquiries into Quantum Realities: Consciousness, Ethics, and Epistemology, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2401033.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2401033.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857079260%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3AisjfH587y13EXlTtD0R4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180724&usg=AOvVaw1TA5t_GSkA-1KW9phiCiKJ) 99. Copenhagen interpretation - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857079499%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw091Q8-Sk4i7LfVZS5U8-zV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180854&usg=AOvVaw2EMymSpLz05OyOkxKo0JxB) 100. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/int-qm/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/int-qm/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857079822%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1PzrTLXu0zGIiBe7e6lFhv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857180988&usg=AOvVaw26WaGTCh09sqXqjGQ5vA0j) 101. Many-worlds interpretation - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857080249%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3XIG2fD6o3Fy_3sKzWGEhu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181122&usg=AOvVaw1EkFxhJJyP2FiudS8MDBum) 102. What is the Big Bang Theory? - Space.com, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857080600%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0fZ5-31UXBfFs885ULGiYn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181258&usg=AOvVaw3J0DLqFCIMxej2dLyRu-e-) 103. Big Bang - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857080915%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1ox3nrdrGVeKU7P__Fbxmo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181386&usg=AOvVaw1RBWqcWdIffzWXl0Y8pBGk) 104. Big Bang Theory: Origin of Our Universe - iarjset, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://iarjset.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IARJSET-NCSTCS-56.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iarjset.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IARJSET-NCSTCS-56.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857081295%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0JwNa2WzirsLJBojWQm7Tg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181521&usg=AOvVaw36xcUG2KmcKXI5_d1sm-r3) 105. Implications of the Big Bang Theory on the Universe's Origin and Evolution: A Historical and Papal Perspective - ResearchGate, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383868989_Implications_of_the_Big_Bang_Theory_on_the_Universe's_Origin_and_Evolution_A_Historical_and_Papal_Perspective](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/383868989_Implications_of_the_Big_Bang_Theory_on_the_Universe%26%2339;s_Origin_and_Evolution_A_Historical_and_Papal_Perspective%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857081943%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw04NzQV_1cD127hxZ8NSYhX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181680&usg=AOvVaw2zB4rLXLOCnxRg6vgvFOhQ) 106. Cyclic model - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_model](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_model%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857082166%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2KatxI0gEC6_fCOxEzJZdI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857181835&usg=AOvVaw33WdJXXTGsEJ8q7JzFYzH-) 107. Conformal cyclic cosmology - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_cyclic_cosmology](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_cyclic_cosmology%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857082432%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Tc7-2ihcd-ehrJ3caQU2l&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182023&usg=AOvVaw1X4RU1hTRUt0isfeog-omF) 108. The Basic Ideas of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology - ResearchGate, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258570944_The_Basic_Ideas_of_Conformal_Cyclic_Cosmology](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/258570944_The_Basic_Ideas_of_Conformal_Cyclic_Cosmology%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857082783%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3hdl7UWlU2L5ayYMvjA6Wj&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182170&usg=AOvVaw3NIryWNDsFJJGarSOu4Ouu) 109. Penrose's Cyclic Cosmology - Sean Carroll, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/12/07/penroses-cyclic-cosmology/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/12/07/penroses-cyclic-cosmology/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857083061%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2l3jzkgho5cdJxrdaxivwD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182318&usg=AOvVaw2yRKs1AxfOdrqoUdATzay0) 110. Philosophy of String Theory - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16353/1/Philosophy%20of%20String%20Theory.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16353/1/Philosophy%252520of%252520String%252520Theory.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857083380%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1FHaYE_Vxa38WNGXcOCUw6&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182464&usg=AOvVaw2pp87cwSiGEgcLlcRDAw3c) 111. Multiverse Assumptions and Philosophy, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://ispcjournal.org/journals/2017-20/Philosophy_and_Cosmology_vol_20_Johnson.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ispcjournal.org/journals/2017-20/Philosophy_and_Cosmology_vol_20_Johnson.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857083880%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3KDKEgHsT7hjHnvInwlejh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182611&usg=AOvVaw3EahSfvMqoi3Jt8ZGWi7DW) 112. The Multiverse, string theory, and how we make choices. - Late Romantic, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://lateromantic.com/2021/04/29/the-multiverse-string-theory-and-how-we-make-choices/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lateromantic.com/2021/04/29/the-multiverse-string-theory-and-how-we-make-choices/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857084544%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw22KTYlxi3jTW2Vew3lspxC&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182760&usg=AOvVaw0vZOvhJ1rv4PbS_n8IWLT1) 113. Multiverse Theory: Implications and Debates - The Network, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://tothenetwork.com/multiverse-theory-implications-and-debates/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://tothenetwork.com/multiverse-theory-implications-and-debates/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857085076%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw03RbopXwPfPKNm6DLqbl8x&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857182904&usg=AOvVaw32g5uha4h7x9MtrLDb4Iwb) 114. Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia, accessed April 13, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_philosophy](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_philosophy%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744638857085585%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qeC1SQsH7ba82yVNiqaSG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744638857183039&usg=AOvVaw0kmtW97Mns2k_qPiDv36ME)