*AI, Quantum Mechanics, Information Parallels* # The Interplay of Information in Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Mechanics: Foundations, Representations, and Cross-Disciplinary Potential ## Section 1: Introduction The proposition that both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) can be fundamentally understood as “information states,” potentially distinct from their physical implementations, offers a provocative lens through which to examine these transformative fields. This perspective suggests that despite AI relying on substrates like silicon transistors and QM manifesting through particles and fields, their core essence might lie in abstract informational structures and processes. Furthermore, it posits a potential for mutual learning between these domains, particularly concerning the representation and processing of continuous information [User Query]. This report undertakes a rigorous, expert-level analysis to explore these ideas. Its objectives are multifaceted: 1. To dissect the conceptual foundations of AI, focusing on its theoretical underpinnings, computational models, and diverse methods of information representation, including the historical divergence between symbolic and connectionist approaches. 2. To examine the fundamental principles of QM, encompassing its mathematical formalism, the central role of the wave function, key phenomena like superposition and entanglement, and the varied interpretations regarding its connection to physical reality. 3. To critically evaluate the philosophical assertion that AI and QM are purely “information states” lacking a direct physical basis, carefully considering the indispensable role of physical hardware in AI and quantum phenomena in QM. 4. To investigate how contemporary AI techniques, especially within machine learning and deep learning, handle continuous versus discrete information. 5. To delve into quantum information science, analyzing how information, including continuous variables, is encoded and processed within quantum systems like qubits and continuous-variable quantum information (CVQI) frameworks. 6. To survey the burgeoning field at the intersection of AI and QM, including Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and the application of AI to quantum physics challenges. 7. To specifically explore the potential for conceptual transfer: how QM might inspire novel approaches to continuous information representation in AI, and conversely, how AI might aid in the understanding and simulation of complex quantum systems. 8. Finally, to synthesize these analyses into a comprehensive evaluation of the initial premise, assessing the validity of the parallels drawn between AI and QM as information frameworks and the prospects for cross-disciplinary insights, particularly regarding continuous representations. The analysis will proceed by examining the core concepts within AI and QM, scrutinizing the philosophical arguments surrounding their nature, detailing the technical aspects of information representation, and reviewing the current state of interdisciplinary research. This examination draws upon established principles and contemporary research findings documented in the provided materials 1 to ensure a grounded and comprehensive perspective. The report follows a structured path, moving from foundational concepts (Sections 2 and 3) through the philosophical debate (Section 4), technical comparisons of information representation (Section 5), and the analysis of the AI-QM intersection (Section 6), culminating in a final synthesis and evaluation (Section 7). ## Section 2: Conceptual Foundations of Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence, as a discipline, seeks to create systems capable of exhibiting behaviors typically associated with human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding.5 Historically, the field has been characterized by a fundamental divergence in approaches, broadly categorized as Symbolic AI and Connectionist AI, each with distinct computational models and methods for representing information.1 ### 2.1 The Symbolic vs. Connectionist Dichotomy From its inception, AI research bifurcated into two main streams: Symbolic AI and Connectionism (or neural nets).8 Symbolic AI, often termed ‘classical AI’ or ‘Good Old-Fashioned AI’ (GOFAI), operates on the principle that intelligence can be achieved through the manipulation of symbols according to explicit rules, much like a logician or a chess computer methodically evaluating moves based on predefined strategies.1 It posits that the use of knowledge in reasoning and learning is critical for intelligent behavior.3 In contrast, Connectionist AI models intelligence based on the structure and function of the human brain, utilizing interconnected networks of simple processing units (artificial neurons).1 This approach postulates that intelligence emerges from learning associations and patterns within vast amounts of data, with little or no prior knowledge assumed.3 The networks adapt and “learn” by adjusting the strength of connections between neurons based on experience.1 This technical divergence reflects a deeper philosophical distinction concerning the nature of intelligence itself. Symbolic AI aligns more closely with the rationalist school of thought, emphasizing the role of innate knowledge structures and reasoning processes acquired through evolution or development.3 Connectionist AI, conversely, resonates with the empiricist tradition, focusing on knowledge acquired through sensory experience and learning from data.3 Understanding this underlying philosophical tension is crucial, as it illuminates the motivations, strengths, and inherent limitations associated with each paradigm. The historical debate wasn’t merely about implementation details but about fundamentally different conceptions of how intelligence arises. ### 2.2 Symbolic AI: Representation and Computation Symbolic AI systems represent information using explicitly defined, often human-readable symbols and structures.1 These symbols stand for real-world entities, concepts, or knowledge abstractions.3 - Information Representation: Knowledge is encoded in various forms, including: - Logical Statements: Using formal logic (like propositional or predicate calculus) to express facts and relationships.8 - Semantic Networks: Graph-based structures where nodes represent concepts and edges represent relationships between them.3 - Frames: Structured representations capturing objects, their attributes (slots), and values.3 - Rule Bases: Collections of “if-then” rules (production rules) that encode procedural or heuristic knowledge.1 The defining characteristic is that knowledge is represented explicitly and is typically interpretable by humans, facilitating auditing, modification, and explanation.1 - Computational Models: Computation in Symbolic AI involves manipulating these symbolic structures according to predefined rules. Core models include: - Rule-Based Systems (Expert Systems): Utilize a knowledge base of rules and facts, processed by an inference engine that applies relevant rules to derive conclusions or make decisions.3 - Logic Programming: Employs formal logic as both the representation language and the computational mechanism. - Search Algorithms: Explore state spaces defined by symbolic representations to find solutions to problems like planning or game playing. - Strengths & Weaknesses: Symbolic AI excels in domains where knowledge is well-defined, rules are clear, and logical reasoning or explainability is paramount, such as medical diagnosis, tax calculation, or chess playing.1 However, it faces significant challenges. The “knowledge acquisition bottleneck”—the difficulty and labor involved in manually encoding vast amounts of real-world knowledge—is a major limitation.10 Symbolic systems often struggle with ambiguity, uncertainty, noisy data, and capturing the implicit “common sense” reasoning humans possess.10 They can be brittle, failing ungracefully when encountering situations outside their predefined knowledge base.9 ### 2.3 Connectionist AI: Representation and Computation Connectionist AI, primarily embodied by artificial neural networks (ANNs), takes a fundamentally different approach inspired by biological neural systems.8 - Information Representation: Knowledge in connectionist systems is typically distributed across the network and represented implicitly.1 Instead of explicit symbols or rules, information is encoded in: - Connection Weights: The numerical strengths of the connections between artificial neurons determine how signals propagate and how the network processes information.3 Learning involves adjusting these weights.10 - Patterns of Activation: Information is processed and represented dynamically through the patterns of activation across the network’s neurons.3 This distributed and implicit representation makes it difficult to isolate or interpret specific pieces of knowledge within the network, leading to the “black box” problem.11 - Computational Models: The core computational unit is the artificial neuron (or perceptron in early models), which receives inputs, performs a weighted sum, applies a non-linear activation function, and produces an output.8 These neurons are organized into layers within various architectures: - Feedforward Networks: Information flows in one direction, typically used for classification and regression.10 - Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): Specialized for grid-like data (e.g., images), exploiting spatial hierarchies.10 - Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs): Designed for sequential data (e.g., text, time series), with connections allowing information to persist.10 The primary computational paradigm is learning from data. Networks are trained on large datasets (often labeled for supervised learning) using algorithms like backpropagation, which iteratively adjust weights to minimize the difference between the network’s output and the desired output.3 - Strengths & Weaknesses: Connectionist models excel at pattern recognition, learning complex non-linear relationships from large datasets, handling noisy or incomplete information, and adapting to new situations.1 They have driven recent breakthroughs in areas like image recognition, natural language processing, and game playing.11 However, they typically require substantial amounts of training data and computational resources.1 Their lack of interpretability (“black box” nature) is a significant drawback in applications requiring transparency and trust.11 They can also be prone to overfitting, where the model learns the training data too well but fails to generalize to new, unseen data.11 The very concept of “information representation” differs profoundly between these paradigms. Symbolic AI treats information as discrete, localized symbols with explicit meaning. Connectionist AI treats information as encoded in continuous-valued weights, distributed across the network, with meaning emerging implicitly from learned patterns. This fundamental difference in how information is conceived and manipulated is central to addressing the query’s focus on continuous representation. ### 2.4 Machine Learning as a Core Component Machine Learning (ML) is a crucial subset of AI, enabling systems to learn and improve from experience without being explicitly programmed.5 While ML techniques exist across different AI paradigms, the recent surge in AI capabilities is largely driven by connectionist ML approaches, particularly deep learning.7 ML algorithms leverage statistical methods to identify patterns, make predictions, and optimize decisions based on data.5 Key types include: - Supervised Learning: Learning a mapping from inputs to outputs based on labeled training data (e.g., classification, regression).5 - Unsupervised Learning: Discovering structure and patterns in unlabeled data (e.g., clustering, dimensionality reduction).5 - Reinforcement Learning: Learning optimal behaviors (policies) by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties.5 ML is the engine that allows connectionist systems to acquire their knowledge from data.11 ### 2.5 Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Approaches Recognizing the complementary strengths and weaknesses of the symbolic and connectionist paradigms, researchers are increasingly exploring hybrid, or neuro-symbolic, approaches.1 The goal is to integrate the robust learning capabilities of neural networks with the explicit reasoning, knowledge representation, and interpretability of symbolic systems.3 Examples include: - Using Large Language Models (LLMs) for language-based knowledge modeling within a symbolic reasoning framework.12 - Architectures like CLARION, which feature distinct interconnected symbolic and neural modules.8 - Systems like ACT-R that blend symbolic and connectionist features.8 - Infusing knowledge into connectionist architectures to enable multi-step inferencing.3 The rise of these hybrid models is not merely a pragmatic engineering solution; it potentially signifies a move towards a more integrated understanding of intelligence. It suggests an acknowledgment that sophisticated, human-like intelligence may require both the capacity for learning complex patterns from vast amounts of data (the strength of connectionism) and the ability to represent and manipulate abstract knowledge and perform logical reasoning (the strength of symbolism). This trend hints at a potential synthesis, moving beyond the strict dichotomy of the field’s early history and perhaps mirroring cognitive science models that posit multiple interacting systems in the human mind.3 ## Section 3: Fundamental Principles of Quantum Mechanics Quantum Mechanics (QM) is the fundamental physical theory describing the behavior of nature at the smallest scales of energy and matter, such as atoms and subatomic particles.15 While spectacularly successful in its predictions 16, its implications for the nature of reality remain deeply debated. QM operates through a distinct mathematical formalism and introduces concepts like superposition and entanglement that defy classical intuition.17 ### 3.1 The Mathematical Formalism At its core, QM is a mathematical framework used to predict the behavior of physical systems.16 Its rigorous formulation relies heavily on linear algebra and functional analysis.21 - States: The state of a quantum system at a given time is represented by a state vector, often denoted as |ψ⟩ (ket notation) or by a wave function ψ.16 This vector belongs to a complex Hilbert space H, a type of vector space equipped with an inner product.16 The specific Hilbert space depends on the system being described.18 State vectors are typically required to be normalized, meaning their inner product with themselves equals 1 (⟨ψ|ψ⟩ = 1), reflecting the unit total probability.18 The overall phase of the state vector is usually considered physically irrelevant.18 - Observables: Physical quantities that can be measured, such as energy, position, momentum, or spin, are represented by Hermitian (self-adjoint) linear operators acting on the Hilbert space H.16 - Eigenvalues and Eigenstates: The possible results of measuring an observable are restricted to the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator.18 If the system’s state vector is an eigenvector (or eigenstate) of an operator, a measurement of the corresponding observable will yield the associated eigenvalue with certainty.18 - Time Evolution: In the absence of measurement, the state vector |ψ(t)⟩ evolves deterministically over time according to the Schrödinger equation: iħ d/dt |ψ(t)⟩ = H |ψ(t)⟩, where H is the Hamiltonian operator representing the total energy of the system, and ħ is the reduced Planck constant.17 ### 3.2 The Wave Function and Information The wave function ψ (or state vector |ψ⟩) is central to QM as it encapsulates the information available about the quantum system’s state.16 It does not typically provide definite values for all observables but rather probability amplitudes.18 - Born Rule: The probability of obtaining a specific eigenvalue λᵢ when measuring an observable A on a system in state |ψ⟩ is given by the square of the absolute value of the probability amplitude associated with the corresponding eigenstate |φᵢ⟩. Mathematically, if |ψ⟩ = Σᵢ cᵢ |φᵢ⟩, where |φᵢ⟩ are the eigenstates of A, then the probability P(λᵢ) = |cᵢ|² = |⟨φᵢ|ψ⟩|².18 This rule underscores the fundamentally probabilistic nature of QM predictions; the theory usually cannot predict measurement outcomes with certainty.18 - Wave-Particle Duality: QM incorporates the concept that quantum objects exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties.17 The de Broglie hypothesis associates a wavelength λ with any particle having momentum p: λ = h/p, where h is Planck’s constant.17 The wave function itself can be seen as embodying this duality, describing a probability wave.24 ### 3.3 Key Quantum Phenomena Several counter-intuitive phenomena are characteristic of QM: - Superposition: A quantum system can exist in a combination of multiple possible states simultaneously.15 For instance, a qubit (quantum bit) can be in a state |ψ⟩ = α|0⟩ + β|1⟩, which is a superposition of the basis states |0⟩ and |1⟩, where α and β are complex probability amplitudes satisfying |α|² + |β|² = 1.21 Only upon measurement does the system yield a definite outcome (0 or 1 in this case).23 It’s important to note that superposition is relative to a chosen basis.22 - Entanglement: This phenomenon, described by Schrödinger as “...the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics” 18, occurs when two or more quantum systems interact in such a way that their fates become intertwined.15 The entangled systems cannot be described independently, even when separated by large distances. Measuring a property of one particle instantaneously influences the properties of the other(s), regardless of separation.17 Mathematically, an entangled state of multiple particles is represented by a superposition that cannot be factored into a simple product of individual particle states.22 Entanglement is a key resource for quantum computing and quantum communication.17 - Uncertainty Principle: Formulated by Werner Heisenberg, this principle states that there are fundamental limits to the precision with which certain pairs of complementary physical properties of a particle, known as conjugate variables (e.g., position and momentum), can be simultaneously known.17 The more precisely one property is determined, the less precisely the other can be known. This is not a limitation of measurement devices but an intrinsic property of quantum systems.17 - Measurement and Collapse: The process of measuring a quantum observable is postulated, in some interpretations, to cause an abrupt change in the system’s state.17 The wave function, previously evolving according to the deterministic Schrödinger equation, appears to instantaneously “collapse” into the eigenstate corresponding to the measurement outcome.17 This process is probabilistic, governed by the Born rule 21, and considered irreversible, preventing retrieval of the original superposition state.23 The nature and reality of this collapse constitute the core of the “measurement problem”.16 The information encoded in quantum states behaves radically differently from classical information. It is inherently probabilistic 18, subject to fundamental uncertainty limits 17, can exhibit non-local correlations via entanglement 18, and is fundamentally disturbed by the act of measurement.17 Furthermore, quantum states cannot be perfectly copied (the no-cloning theorem).23 This distinct nature suggests that if QM is viewed as an “information theory,” it operates under rules vastly different from those governing the classical information processed by conventional AI systems.34 ### 3.4 Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics While the mathematical formalism of QM is well-established and provides incredibly accurate predictions 16, its physical meaning and implications for reality are subject to ongoing debate, leading to numerous interpretations.16 These interpretations attempt to bridge the gap between the abstract mathematics and our experience of the world 26, differing on fundamental questions like determinism vs. stochasticity, locality vs. non-locality, the reality of the wave function, and the nature of measurement.26 - Copenhagen Interpretation: One of the oldest and most widely taught views, associated with Bohr and Heisenberg.17 It posits that QM is intrinsically indeterministic, with probabilities given by the Born rule.26 It emphasizes complementarity (pairs of properties like wave and particle aspects cannot be simultaneously observed) and argues that properties only become definite upon measurement.26 The wave function collapse is taken as a real process triggered by measurement.17 Some variants view the wave function primarily as a tool for calculation or representing knowledge.17 - Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI): Proposed by Hugh Everett III.18 It asserts that the universal wave function always evolves deterministically according to the Schrödinger equation, without any collapse.26 Every quantum measurement causes the universe to “split” or branch into multiple parallel universes, each realizing one of the possible outcomes.17 Decoherence explains why these branches become effectively isolated and why observers perceive only one outcome.26 In MWI, all quantum information is preserved across the multiverse.26 - Information-Centric Interpretations: These approaches view QM as fundamentally about information, knowledge, or belief rather than directly describing an independent physical reality.26 Examples include: - QBism (Quantum Bayesianism): Interprets quantum states as representing an agent’s subjective degrees of belief about measurement outcomes, using the Born rule as a guide for updating beliefs.18 - Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM): Posits that a system’s state is relative to the observer; different observers can have different valid descriptions.18 - Wheeler’s “It from Bit”: A more ontological view suggesting that physical reality itself arises from information.26 In these views, wave function collapse is often seen as an observer updating their information upon measurement, not an objective physical event.26 - Hidden Variable Theories (e.g., de Broglie-Bohm): These theories propose that QM is incomplete and that underlying “hidden variables” exist which deterministically determine measurement outcomes.18 Bohmian mechanics, for example, postulates both a wave function guiding particles and definite particle positions at all times.18 Due to Bell’s theorem and experimental violations of Bell inequalities 22, local hidden variable theories are generally ruled out; viable hidden variable theories like Bohmian mechanics must be non-local.21 - Other Interpretations: Many other interpretations exist, including Consistent Histories, the Ensemble interpretation, Transactional interpretation, and Modal interpretations, each offering a different perspective on the meaning of the quantum formalism.26 The sheer variety and persistence of these interpretations underscore a crucial point: while QM’s mathematical machinery is undisputed in its predictive power, what this mathematics tells us about the fundamental nature of reality remains profoundly ambiguous.16 This interpretational openness contrasts significantly with classical physics and even with the relationship between AI algorithms and their hardware implementations, where the connection, while complex, is generally less metaphysically fraught. Furthermore, the “measurement problem”—how the deterministic evolution of the wave function gives rise to definite, probabilistic outcomes upon interaction with a measurement device—stands as a central unresolved issue in the foundations of QM.16 Different interpretations provide vastly different accounts of this process, ranging from an actual physical collapse (Copenhagen) to universal branching (MWI) to a mere update of observer knowledge (Information-centric views).26 This highlights the potentially non-trivial role of the observer or the measurement context itself within the theory, a feature generally absent from classical physics and standard computational models in AI.31 ## Section 4: The Nature of AI and QM: Information States vs. Physical Grounding The assertion that both AI and QM are fundamentally “information states” lacking a “physical basis” invites a careful examination of what these terms imply and how well they apply to each field [User Query]. It forces a distinction between the abstract, informational, or computational aspects of a system and its concrete, physical realization or domain of description. ### 4.1 Defining “Information State” vs. “Physical Basis” For the purpose of this analysis, an “information state” perspective suggests that the essential identity and behavior of a system are defined by abstract patterns of information and the rules governing their processing. In this view, the physical substrate that implements these patterns and rules might be considered secondary or, in principle, interchangeable (substrate independence). Conversely, a “physical basis” perspective asserts that a system is fundamentally defined by its physical constituents (matter, energy, fields) and the physical laws governing their interactions. The system’s properties and behaviors are seen as intrinsically tied to, or emergent from, this physical foundation. ### 4.2 Arguments for AI as Primarily Informational Several arguments support viewing AI, particularly in its current dominant forms, as primarily informational: - Computational Nature: AI is fundamentally rooted in computer science and is often defined in terms of algorithms, data structures, and computational processes designed to simulate or achieve intelligent behavior.5 The focus is on computation as the means to replicate cognitive functions.8 - Substrate Independence (Classical AI): A cornerstone of classical computation theory (and thus much of AI) is the idea of universality and substrate independence. The same algorithm (the informational structure) can, in principle, be executed on vastly different physical hardware (e.g., silicon chips, vacuum tubes, mechanical relays), suggesting the information processing logic is primary.1 - Functionalism: In the philosophy of mind, functionalism (often associated with AI) posits that mental states (like beliefs or desires, or potentially consciousness) are defined by their functional role—their causal relations to inputs, outputs, and other mental states—rather than by their specific physical implementation. AI’s success is often measured by its functional capabilities (e.g., solving a problem, translating language, winning a game).37 ### 4.3 Arguments for AI’s Physical Grounding Despite the informational focus, compelling arguments emphasize AI’s dependence on physical reality: - Hardware Implementation: AI algorithms require physical hardware to execute.38 The performance, scalability, energy consumption, and ultimate capabilities of any AI system are directly constrained by the physical properties of its substrate (CPUs, GPUs, specialized AI accelerators, or potentially quantum computers).32 Connectionist models, in particular, may have their behavior influenced by the specific hardware implementation.3 Even if theoretically substrate-independent, practical AI is physically embodied in hardware. - Embodiment and Interaction: For AI systems designed to interact with the physical world, such as robots, embodiment is crucial.5 Sensors provide input from the physical environment, and actuators allow the AI to effect changes in that environment.39 Theories of embodied cognition argue that intelligence itself emerges from, and is inseparable from, an agent’s physical body and its interactions with the world.40 Understanding the nature of AI beings requires considering the terms of their embodiment.40 - Energy and Thermodynamics: As physical systems, AI hardware consumes energy and is subject to the laws of thermodynamics. These physical constraints are relevant to the feasibility and design of large-scale AI systems. - Biological Inspiration and Consciousness: Many AI approaches are inspired by the brain, a biological organ.10 Furthermore, if AI were ever to achieve consciousness—a topic of intense philosophical debate 37—some philosophical positions argue that consciousness is intrinsically tied to a specific kind of physical substrate, possibly biological.38 The “Hard Problem of Consciousness” specifically questions why certain physical states should give rise to subjective experience at all.43 ### 4.4 Arguments for QM as Primarily Informational The view of QM as fundamentally informational has gained traction, particularly through certain interpretations: - Information-Centric Interpretations: As discussed in Section 3.4, interpretations like QBism, RQM, and Wheeler’s “It from Bit” explicitly frame QM in terms of information, observer knowledge, or subjective belief.26 Wave function collapse is reinterpreted as an update of information.26 Some go further, suggesting information is the fundamental ontology from which physical reality emerges.26 - Abstract Mathematical Formalism: The theory relies heavily on abstract mathematical constructs like state vectors in Hilbert space.16 An instrumentalist view holds that the formalism is primarily a tool for predicting observations, and seeking a deeper description of underlying reality is misguided.20 - Quantum Information Theory (QIT): The rise of QIT treats quantum states explicitly as carriers of “quantum information,” a quantifiable resource distinct from classical information.34 Concepts like qubits are defined as units of quantum information.34 This perspective emphasizes the informational aspects of quantum systems. - Algorithmic Perspectives: Some theoretical approaches attempt to derive quantum phenomena from principles of computation or algorithmic information theory, suggesting that the laws of physics might emerge from constraints on how observers process information.45 ### 4.5 Arguments for QM’s Physical Grounding However, the view that QM is purely informational and lacks a physical basis faces strong counterarguments: - Domain of Description: QM was developed to describe and predict the behavior of the physical world at the microscopic level—particles, atoms, radiation, fields.15 Its empirical success is measured by its ability to accurately predict the outcomes of experiments performed on physical systems.16 - Physical Interactions and Measurement: Measurement in QM involves a physical interaction between the quantum system under investigation and a macroscopic measuring apparatus.16 The measurement problem arises precisely because of the difficulty in describing this physical interaction consistently within the theory.30 Bohr emphasized the indispensable role of measuring agencies and the finite interaction conditioned by the quantum of action.36 - Observable Physical Phenomena: Superposition, entanglement, quantization of energy levels, quantum tunneling—these are not mere mathematical artifacts but physical phenomena that are experimentally observed and utilized in quantum technologies.17 - Ontological Debates: The persistent debates about the interpretation of QM—e.g., whether the wave function is real (ontic) or represents knowledge (epistemic), or whether particles have definite trajectories (Bohmian mechanics 18)—are fundamentally debates about the physical ontology implied by the theory.26 The very concept of “physical reality” is central to these discussions.36 ### 4.6 Critical Assessment of the User’s Premise Evaluating the initial premise—that AI and QM are purely “information states” lacking a physical basis—reveals it to be an oversimplification, potentially conflating different levels of description. - AI is not without a physical basis: AI requires physical hardware for its existence and operation. Its capabilities are constrained by this hardware. Embodied AI is further grounded through physical interaction. The claim it lacks a physical basis is untenable.32 However, one can argue that its essence is informational/computational, with the physical substrate being (at least classically) a contingent implementation detail. - QM is not without a physical basis: QM is our most fundamental theory of the physical world at the microscale. It describes physical entities and phenomena. The claim it lacks a physical basis seems contradictory to its purpose and domain.16 However, the nature of that physical reality and how the formalism relates to it is deeply ambiguous and interpretation-dependent. Some interpretations lean heavily towards an informational view, suggesting the formalism might primarily describe knowledge or constraints on information rather than objective properties.26 The crucial distinction might lie not in whether a physical basis exists, but in its role and nature. For classical AI, the physical basis is the medium for computation. For QM, the “physical basis” is the subject matter—the quantum phenomena themselves that the theory describes. Furthermore, the role of the observer or agent introduces a significant difference. In standard AI, the observer is typically external to the computational system being analyzed. In QM, however, the act of observation or measurement is intrinsically linked to the theory’s structure and interpretation.26 In interpretations like Copenhagen, RQM, or QBism, the state itself might be observer-dependent or represent observer knowledge, blurring the line between the “information state” and the process of accessing it. This complicates any simple notion of QM representing a detached, objective information state. Finally, the concept of emergence operates differently. Complex AI behaviors emerge from the interactions of simpler computational components according to programmed rules.32 In QM, classical reality is often seen as emerging from the underlying quantum reality via processes like decoherence.22 QM itself is typically considered fundamental, not emergent from computation (though some speculative theories explore this 21). This difference impacts how we relate each field to its “basis.” In conclusion, while both AI and QM heavily involve information processing and abstract formalisms, labeling them purely as “information states” lacking a physical basis is inaccurate. Both are inextricably linked to the physical world, albeit in different ways—AI through its implementation substrate and interaction channels, QM through its descriptive domain and the phenomena it governs. The informational perspective is valuable for understanding both, but it should not obscure their necessary connection to physical reality. ## Section 5: Representing Continuous and Discrete Information A key aspect of the user’s query concerns how AI and QM handle continuous versus discrete information. Understanding these differences is crucial for evaluating the potential for cross-disciplinary learning in representing continuous phenomena. ### 5.1 Defining Continuous vs. Discrete Data The fundamental distinction lies in the nature of the values data can take: - Discrete Data: Represents items that are countable and have distinct, separate values. There are clear gaps between possible values. Examples include the number of users, clicks, categories, or shoe sizes (which may include half sizes but not values in between).46 Discrete data is often represented using bar graphs, pie charts, or stem-and-leaf plots.46 - Continuous Data: Represents items that are measurable and can take on any value within a given range. There are potentially infinite values between any two points. Examples include temperature, height, weight, time, or voltage.46 Continuous data is typically visualized using line graphs, histograms, or frequency tables.46 ### 5.2 Information Representation in AI AI techniques employ various strategies for representing and processing both discrete and continuous information: - Symbolic AI: This paradigm primarily operates on discrete representations. Knowledge is encoded using symbols, logical propositions, rules, and structured objects, all of which are inherently discrete entities.1 Handling continuous information often requires discretization (dividing continuous ranges into discrete bins) or specialized symbolic representations that can approximate continuous functions, which can be cumbersome. - Connectionist AI / Deep Learning: These methods are adept at handling both types of data, though often in different ways. - Inputs/Outputs: Inputs and outputs can be discrete (e.g., image pixels, class labels in classification, words/tokens in language models 50) or continuous (e.g., sensor readings, predicted temperature). - Internal Representations: A key strength of ANNs is their use of continuous internal representations. Information is encoded in continuous-valued connection weights and neuron activations.50 High-dimensional vectors (embeddings) learned by deep networks provide rich, continuous representations of even discrete inputs like words, capturing semantic relationships.50 This continuous internal state space allows networks to learn complex, non-linear mappings and generalize across variations in input data. - LLMs: While operating on discrete input/output tokens, LLMs rely heavily on continuous internal embeddings to capture meaning and context.50 The idea that LLMs represent a “continuous form of knowledge” is debated; some argue this merely reflects the mathematical rescaling of discrete counts into probabilities or scores, rather than a fundamentally different kind of knowledge.50 - Robotics and Control Systems: These domains inherently involve continuous variables representing the physical state of the robot and its environment (e.g., joint angles, velocities, positions from sensors).5 AI techniques, particularly deep learning and reinforcement learning, are increasingly used to learn dynamic models or control policies directly from continuous sensor data or state representations, often bypassing the need for explicit discretization.13 Control theory itself offers methods like adaptive control and non-linear control specifically designed for continuous, time-varying systems.39 - Scientific Simulation: AI and ML are employed to accelerate or approximate simulations of complex physical systems, which frequently involve continuous variables governed by differential equations.7 Deep learning models can learn mappings between continuous input parameters and simulation outputs. The use of continuous internal representations in ANNs allows them to capture subtle nuances and non-linearities in data, facilitating generalization in continuous domains. However, these representations often lack the interpretability of discrete symbolic structures.11 Discrete representations offer clarity and logical tractability but can struggle with the complexity and fine gradations of continuous real-world data.9 Hybrid AI approaches aim to bridge this gap, combining discrete symbolic reasoning with continuous neural processing.51 A point of nuance arises here: while connectionist AI utilizes continuous mathematics internally (weights, activations), it often operates on inputs that are fundamentally discrete (like language tokens 50) or represent measurements of continuous quantities that have been digitized or sampled. The “continuity” lies primarily in the learned function or the internal state space, which allows flexible mapping between inputs and outputs. This might differ from representing a fundamentally continuous process or distribution in the way QM potentially does with wave functions or CVQI with field quadratures. ### 5.3 Information Representation in Quantum Information Science Quantum Information Science (QIS) offers distinct frameworks for encoding information, explicitly differentiating between discrete and continuous variable approaches: - Qubit-Based (Discrete Variable - DV): This is the more commonly discussed paradigm. Information is encoded in the state of qubits, which are two-level quantum systems (e.g., spin of an electron, polarization of a photon).19 The state space is described by finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.55 A system of N qubits has 2ᴺ basis states. Quantum computation in this model proceeds via discrete quantum gates (unitary operations) acting on one or more qubits.4 This is often described as “digital” quantum computation.55 While the state vector itself involves continuous complex amplitudes, the basis states and measurement outcomes are discrete. - Continuous Variable Quantum Information (CVQI): This approach utilizes quantum systems whose relevant observables have continuous spectra, such as the position and momentum of a particle or, more commonly, the amplitude and phase quadratures of electromagnetic field modes (light).56 The state space is described by infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.55 Information is encoded in these continuous degrees of freedom. Quantum operations are implemented using components like beam splitters, phase shifters, squeezers, and non-linear interactions, which perform transformations on these continuous variables.59 Measurement typically involves techniques like homodyne or heterodyne detection, which yield information about the continuous quadrature values.56 CVQI is sometimes referred to as “analog” quantum computation 55 and offers potential advantages in areas like quantum communication due to easier integration with existing telecommunication infrastructure.58 - Hybrid CV-DV Systems: Recognizing that both discrete and continuous descriptions are valuable, research explores hybrid systems that combine CV and DV elements.59 This can involve encoding discrete qubit states within the larger continuous state space of an oscillator (e.g., Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states 56) or physically coupling qubit systems to bosonic modes (like trapped ions interacting with motional modes).59 The aim is to leverage the strengths of both approaches, potentially leading to more efficient algorithms, simulations (e.g., of mixed boson-fermion systems), or hardware architectures.59 This explicit distinction within QIS between DV and CV frameworks provides a potentially richer lens for considering discrete versus continuous information processing compared to the historical symbolic/connectionist divide in AI. Hybrid CV-DV quantum systems represent a concerted effort to natively integrate both types of information processing at a fundamental quantum level 59, perhaps offering a different path towards integration than the often architecturally layered hybrid approaches in classical AI. However, CVQI faces its own significant challenges, particularly concerning the control and correction of errors in infinite-dimensional spaces.58 Managing information and computation reliably in inherently continuous quantum systems presents difficulties that might echo, albeit through different physical mechanisms, the challenges AI encounters in modeling and controlling complex continuous real-world dynamics.39 This suggests potential, high-level analogies in tackling the complexities of continuous domains. ### 5.4 Comparison of Information Representation Frameworks The following table summarizes the key characteristics of information representation across these different paradigms: | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---| |Feature|Symbolic AI|Connectionist AI (Deep Learning)|Qubit-based QI (DV)|Continuous Variable QI (CVQI)| |Fundamental Unit|Symbol, Rule, Logical Statement|Artificial Neuron, Connection Weight|Qubit|Bosonic Mode, Field Quadrature| |Representation Nature|Explicit, Localized, Discrete|Implicit, Distributed, Continuous (Internal)|Discrete States (Basis), Finite-Dim Hilbert Space|Continuous Observables, Infinite-Dim Hilbert Space| |Mathematical Tools|Logic, Discrete Math, Graph Theory|Linear Algebra, Calculus, Probability Theory|Finite-Dim Linear Algebra (Complex)|Infinite-Dim Linear Algebra, Phase Space Methods| |Processing Style|Rule-based Inference, Search|Parallel Distributed Processing, Gradient Descent|Discrete Quantum Gates (Unitary Matrices)|Continuous Unitary Ops (e.g., squeezing, rotation)| |Handling Continuity|Often requires discretization/approximation|Native via continuous weights/activations/embeddings|Requires encoding into discrete states (e.g., GKP)|Native via continuous observables/states| |Key Strengths|Explainability, Precision, Logical Reasoning|Pattern Recognition, Adaptation, Generalization|Scalable discrete computation (potential)|High communication rates, Sensor interfacing (potential)| |Key Limitations|Brittleness, Knowledge Bottleneck, Scalability|Interpretability (“Black Box”), Data/Compute Needs|Decoherence, Scalability, Error Correction|Decoherence, Control Complexity, Error Correction| This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed. Symbolic AI is inherently discrete. Connectionist AI uses continuous internal mechanisms, often to process discrete or digitized data. DV Quantum Information uses discrete basis states but continuous amplitudes. CVQI provides a framework for natively quantum continuous information processing. ## Section 6: The AI-Quantum Mechanics Nexus The intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Mechanics is a rapidly developing field, often termed Quantum AI (QAI), characterized by a bidirectional flow of influence.23 Research explores both how quantum computing can enhance AI capabilities and how AI techniques can help overcome challenges in quantum science and technology.23 ### 6.1 Quantum Algorithms Enhancing AI (Quantum Machine Learning - QML) QML investigates how quantum computation can be leveraged to solve problems in machine learning, potentially offering speedups or other advantages over classical methods.4 - Potential Advantages: Quantum algorithms show theoretical promise for accelerating tasks common in ML that involve linear algebra (e.g., matrix operations via algorithms like HHL 61, Principal Component Analysis 61), optimization (e.g., using quantum annealing or Grover’s search 23), and sampling from complex probability distributions.19 - NISQ Era Approaches: Given the limitations of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware (limited qubit counts, short coherence times, lack of fault tolerance 4), much current QML research focuses on hybrid quantum-classical algorithms.23 Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are prominent examples.61 These involve a Parameterized Quantum Circuit (PQC), often called a Quantum Neural Network (QNN), whose parameters are optimized by a classical computer in a feedback loop.4 The quantum computer evaluates an objective function (e.g., a cost function in ML), and the classical optimizer adjusts the PQC parameters to minimize it.61 - Applications: QML techniques are being explored across various AI domains: - Machine Learning: VQAs/QNNs are applied to supervised learning (classification 62), unsupervised learning (clustering 23), and reinforcement learning (e.g., for robot navigation 23).14 Hybrid quantum-classical deep learning models have been proposed for tasks like botnet detection.62 - Optimization: Quantum approaches, including VQAs and quantum annealing, target combinatorial optimization problems relevant to AI.23 - Other AI Areas: Research extends to Quantum Planning and Scheduling (QPS) 23, Quantum Computer Vision (QCV) 23, Quantum Natural Language Processing (QNLP) 23, and Quantum Multi-Agent Systems (QMAS).23 For example, quantum methods are explored for path planning 23, image segmentation 23, and modeling language semantics using quantum structures.10 - Challenges: Despite theoretical promise, demonstrating practical quantum advantage for real-world ML problems remains challenging.23 NISQ hardware limitations are significant.4 VQAs can suffer from “barren plateaus” where gradients vanish during training, hindering optimization.61 Efficiently loading classical data into quantum states (the input/output problem) is another bottleneck.60 Furthermore, research into “dequantization” sometimes reveals classical algorithms that can match the performance of proposed quantum algorithms, particularly for certain ML tasks.61 Some researchers remain skeptical about the near-term viability of VQAs for achieving significant advantage.61 ### 6.2 AI Accelerating Quantum Science & Technology Conversely, classical AI and ML techniques are proving valuable tools for advancing quantum computing and quantum physics research.4 - Applications: - Quantum Control and Calibration: ML algorithms, including reinforcement learning and Bayesian methods, can optimize the control pulses used to manipulate qubits, calibrate quantum devices more efficiently, and even discover new experimental protocols for state preparation.23 - Quantum Error Correction (QEC) and Mitigation (QEM): ML models, particularly deep neural networks, are being developed as efficient decoders for QEC codes, processing syndrome measurements to identify and correct errors.23 ML can also be used for QEM, learning to predict noise-free expectation values from noisy quantum circuit outputs, potentially reducing overhead compared to traditional methods.4 AI can also help optimize the design of QEC codes themselves.4 Interestingly, the inherent noise in quantum systems is sometimes mirrored by the beneficial role noise can play in classical ML training (e.g., stochastic gradient descent avoiding local minima).60 - Quantum Circuit Optimization (Transpilation): AI techniques (e.g., RL, evolutionary algorithms) are used to compile high-level quantum algorithms into sequences of gates executable on specific hardware, optimizing for gate count, circuit depth, and qubit connectivity while minimizing the impact of noise.4 - Algorithm and Hardware Design: AI can assist in discovering novel quantum algorithms or designing improved quantum hardware architectures, such as optimizing qubit layouts for better connectivity or fidelity.23 - Analyzing Quantum Data: ML is useful for analyzing the large and complex datasets generated by quantum experiments or simulations, including tasks like quantum state tomography (characterizing unknown quantum states from measurement data).60 This bidirectional relationship shows a practical synergy. While the impact of quantum computing on mainstream AI is still largely prospective and faces significant hurdles, classical AI is already providing tangible benefits in the challenging task of building and controlling quantum systems. This suggests a potential asymmetry in the near-term impact, with AI perhaps offering more immediate practical advantages to quantum computing development than vice versa. ### 6.3 Conceptual Cross-Fertilization (Focus on Continuity) Beyond practical applications, can the fundamental concepts of QM inspire new paradigms in AI, particularly for representing and processing continuous information? This area is more speculative but holds intriguing possibilities.27 - Wave Function Analogies: The quantum wave function describes a probability amplitude distribution over a continuous configuration space.18 Could this mathematical structure inspire AI models better equipped to handle uncertainty, probabilistic reasoning, or generative tasks within continuous domains, perhaps going beyond standard probability distributions used in ML? - Superposition and Parallelism: Quantum superposition allows a system to explore multiple states simultaneously.17 While quantum parallelism exploited in algorithms is distinct from classical parallel processing 19, the concept of representing and evolving multiple possibilities concurrently might inspire novel AI architectures for search, planning, or modeling in continuous state spaces.27 - Field Theory Concepts: Quantum Field Theory (QFT) extends QM to describe continuous fields and systems with infinite degrees of freedom.33 Could the mathematical tools and concepts of QFT offer insights for AI dealing with complex, continuous spatio-temporal data, such as in physics simulation or environmental modeling? (This remains highly speculative). - CVQI Inspiration: As discussed in Section 5.3, CVQI provides a native quantum framework for continuous variables.56 The specific mathematical structures (e.g., phase space representations like the Wigner function 56), operators (e.g., displacement, squeezing 59), and measurement techniques (homodyne detection 56) used in CVQI might offer more direct inspiration for novel classical or quantum AI methods handling continuous data than analogies drawn from standard qubit-based QM. - Challenges: Translating QM concepts directly into classical AI architectures is non-trivial. The underlying physics is fundamentally different, and the counter-intuitive “weirdness” of quantum phenomena (like entanglement or measurement collapse) may not have meaningful analogues in typical AI problem domains. Much of the power of QM arises from complex amplitudes and interference 23, which lack direct classical counterparts. Currently, the AI-QM intersection appears dominated by practical applications rather than deep conceptual integration influencing fundamental AI architectures, especially concerning continuity. While QM concepts are philosophically stimulating 31, their concrete application to redesigning AI’s handling of continuous information, beyond the use of quantum computation in QML, remains largely speculative. Furthermore, much of the QML literature focuses on achieving computational speedups for existing ML tasks.4 There seems to be less emphasis on exploring whether quantum computation could enable fundamentally new kinds of AI representations or reasoning processes, particularly for continuous information, that leverage QM principles in ways other than just faster linear algebra or optimization. The CVQI framework 55 might represent a more direct avenue for exploring quantum approaches to intrinsically continuous information processing. ### 6.4 AI for QM Understanding AI may also play a role in deepening our understanding of QM itself. - Interpreting Complexity: ML tools can help analyze complex data from quantum simulations or experiments, potentially revealing patterns or correlations that are difficult for humans to discern.23 Explainable AI (XAI) techniques are being explored to interpret the behavior of quantum circuits like PQCs.9 - Exploring Foundations: While speculative, AI could potentially be used to explore the consequences of different QM interpretations or even search for new theoretical frameworks by analyzing experimental data or simulating complex quantum scenarios under different assumptions. ## Section 7: Synthesis and Evaluation This report has analyzed the conceptual foundations of Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Mechanics, examined the philosophical debate surrounding their nature as informational versus physical systems, compared their methods for representing continuous and discrete information, and explored the interactions between the two fields. This concluding section synthesizes these findings to evaluate the user’s initial premise and assess the potential for cross-disciplinary learning, particularly concerning continuous information representation. ### 7.1 Re-evaluating the User’s Premise The initial premise suggested that both AI and QM are fundamentally “information states” lacking a direct physical basis, despite their physical implementations [User Query]. The analysis presented in Section 4 indicates this is an oversimplification. - AI’s Physical Connection: AI systems demonstrably require physical hardware for computation, storage, and, in the case of robotics, interaction with the world.32 Their performance and capabilities are inextricably linked to this physical substrate. While classical AI algorithms might exhibit theoretical substrate independence, any actual AI is a physical system. - QM’s Physical Connection: QM is the fundamental theory describing the physical world at the microscopic scale.16 It deals with physical entities (particles, fields) and predicts the outcomes of physical measurements and interactions.26 While certain interpretations emphasize information or observer knowledge 26, they do so in the context of understanding physical phenomena. Therefore, neither AI nor QM can be accurately described as lacking a physical basis. However, the premise correctly identifies the profound informational character of both fields. AI is, by definition, concerned with information processing, computation, and the representation of knowledge.5 QM, through its mathematical formalism, encodes probabilistic information about physical systems, and the field of quantum information science explicitly treats quantum states as carriers of a unique type of information.18 The crucial distinction lies in the nature of the information and the role of the physical basis. AI (currently) deals primarily with classical information processing implemented on classical or potentially quantum hardware. QM deals with quantum information, governed by different rules (probabilistic, non-local, measurement-dependent 18), where the physical phenomena themselves (superposition, entanglement) are both the subject of the theory and the potential substrate for quantum computation. The relationship between formalism, information, and physical reality is also interpreted differently, being relatively straightforward in AI but deeply contested in QM.16 ### 7.2 Assessing Parallels and Cross-Learning Potential for Continuous Representation The query specifically highlighted the potential for mutual learning regarding continuous information representation. - Parallels: At a high level, both connectionist AI and QM (especially CVQI) utilize continuous mathematical descriptions. ANNs use continuous weights and activations in high-dimensional vector spaces.50 QM uses state vectors with continuous complex amplitudes in Hilbert spaces 18, and CVQI explicitly uses continuous observables and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.55 Both fields grapple with the challenges of managing complexity, control, and noise within these continuous domains.11 - QM Informing AI on Continuity: - Potential: The mathematical structures of QM, such as the wave function’s representation of probability distributions over continuous spaces 18 or the phase space methods of CVQI 56, could potentially inspire novel AI architectures. Analogies with superposition might suggest ways to explore continuous possibility spaces.27 CVQI offers a quantum-native framework for continuous variables.56 - Challenges: Direct translation is difficult due to the fundamentally different physics and the lack of clear classical analogues for many quantum effects (interference, entanglement). Much of the practical QML work focuses on speedups for discrete tasks or tasks involving linear algebra, rather than fundamentally rethinking continuous representation based on QM principles.4 The conceptual leap remains largely speculative. - AI Informing QM on Continuity: - Potential: AI, particularly ML, provides powerful tools for analyzing complex data and learning patterns in high-dimensional continuous spaces. These could be applied to analyze data from CV quantum experiments, aid in the control and calibration of CV systems, or potentially help simulate complex continuous quantum dynamics.23 - Limitations: Simulating quantum systems, especially large or highly entangled ones, remains computationally challenging even for the most powerful classical AI. AI operates under classical rules and may struggle to capture the nuances of quantum phenomena like interference or non-locality directly. Overall Assessment: While superficial parallels exist in the use of continuous mathematics, the potential for deep conceptual transfer from QM to AI regarding continuous representation appears limited and largely unrealized at present. The fundamental differences in the type of information (classical vs. quantum), the governing rules (classical logic/probability vs. QM postulates), the role of measurement, and the underlying physical basis create significant barriers to direct translation. CVQI might offer a more promising avenue for quantum-native continuous information processing than drawing analogies from standard QM formulations. The most concrete and rapidly advancing area of interaction is the practical application of AI tools to solve engineering challenges in quantum computing (including CV systems) and the exploration of quantum algorithms (mostly VQAs in the NISQ era) for potential speedups in AI tasks.4 ### 7.3 Concluding Thoughts The relationship between AI and QM is multifaceted and evolving. AI, whether classical or quantum, is fundamentally about information processing, but this processing is always instantiated in and constrained by a physical substrate. QM is our most fundamental theory of physical reality at the microscale, a reality that exhibits profound and counter-intuitive informational characteristics described by a powerful mathematical formalism whose ultimate interpretation remains elusive. Viewing both simply as “information states” obscures crucial differences in the type of information involved (classical vs. quantum), the rules governing its behavior, the role of the physical substrate, and the problematic nature of measurement in QM. The most significant interaction currently lies in the practical synergy: AI techniques are proving invaluable for building and controlling quantum systems, while quantum computing holds theoretical promise (yet to be broadly realized) for accelerating certain AI computations. The deeper conceptual cross-fertilization, particularly QM inspiring new ways for AI to represent continuous information, remains an open research question. While analogies based on wave functions, superposition, or field theories are intellectually stimulating, translating these into effective classical AI paradigms is challenging. The distinct framework of Continuous Variable Quantum Information might offer a more direct, albeit still quantum, path for exploring continuous information processing. Future progress may depend on advances in both quantum hardware (especially for CVQI and fault-tolerant systems) and theoretical breakthroughs in understanding the fundamental connections between information, computation, and physical reality. #### Works Cited 1. Symbolic AI vs. Connectionist AI: Know the Difference - SmythOS, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-tutorials/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-tutorials/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534906478%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw262UAOc1SpnRyzhCtwzWS1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534985803&usg=AOvVaw0vaerG_gRjG0Gq-yZrLFCh) 2. The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - PBS, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/manyworlds/pdf/dissertation.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/manyworlds/pdf/dissertation.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534907106%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3SkjcjpDno63qGAR4TWPGu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986384&usg=AOvVaw1tlV3Fwmd8QHLoOpS99Cpo) 3. ojs.aaai.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/download/15111/18883](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/download/15111/18883%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534907586%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3nAIlj3njvi_cCNyfvfvKB&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986466&usg=AOvVaw383J71eb08s3JRzt5UVSL0) 4. Quantum Machine Learning: An Interplay Between Quantum Computing and Machine LearningThe views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Wells Fargo. This article is for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this article should be construed as investment advice. Wells Fargo makes no express or implied warranties and disclaims all - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2411.09403v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2411.09403v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534908293%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw15bkbcZ58GU5GxlNDqNgi9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986561&usg=AOvVaw2w6Y3nEM2zUfF0w0l1EPBt) 5. What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? - Palo Alto Networks, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/artificial-intelligence-ai](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/artificial-intelligence-ai%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534908733%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2doFEEaRpXwbf8FuacFw_g&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986635&usg=AOvVaw30SYYkcht_GB71sEYK-mJp) 6. AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems - PMC, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830986/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830986/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534909291%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0SE_eFNKtrpq0qXymZ-6ab&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986713&usg=AOvVaw2ui0cc77PBpy0eSqCRy7sx) 7. Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633405/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633405/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534909692%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1HUz0bhvG0evFTBFu280Ic&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986785&usg=AOvVaw2yZ8LjNuK3iT-k6cCUmesS) 8. History, motivations and core themes of AI - University of Memphis..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=ccrg_papers](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D1029%2526context%253Dccrg_papers%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534910329%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0LKSbYka7HK-VjHCf5TGQH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534986860&usg=AOvVaw0a7ljCbwwnLcZdrvqaJrVl) 9. AI for Beginners - The Difference Between Symbolic & Connectionist AI - RE•WORK Blog, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://blog.re-work.co/the-difference-between-symbolic-ai-and-connectionist-ai/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://blog.re-work.co/the-difference-between-symbolic-ai-and-connectionist-ai/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534910828%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw05MrwP78Sqpo_7C8hPkm7H&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987030&usg=AOvVaw37G5C-BGTqU4T_9dCr1pvQ) 10. Symbolic AI vs. Connectionist AI: Unveiling the Fundamental Differences - Medium, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://medium.com/@interprobeit/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai-unveiling-the-fundamental-differences-ecef3bf8063f](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://medium.com/@interprobeit/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai-unveiling-the-fundamental-differences-ecef3bf8063f%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534911375%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1nNXwnJmyzf6b1BDVlrc2p&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987112&usg=AOvVaw2GpX5YqSr56rohZkNUiQkf) 11. Connectionism - Lark, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.larksuite.com/en_us/topics/ai-glossary/connectionism](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.larksuite.com/en_us/topics/ai-glossary/connectionism%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534911722%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0mY43Gx0eOqNqId4Xg5vl5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987192&usg=AOvVaw1pp55p5ATXBLskKKJjbiFl) 12. Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2407.08516v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2407.08516v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534912120%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lOmgpvmV7eZD_1xLtIZwy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987268&usg=AOvVaw0taEIQ2WFvon-JUSDR-9b-) 13. Deep Learning in Robotics: A Review of Recent Research Harry A. Pierson (corresponding author) - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07217](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07217%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534912507%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2wnvhwfEDQxYuk7AaKD7w1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987338&usg=AOvVaw0E1s2nltIRxCu494elhSPL) 14. Full article: Quantum machine learning: from physics to software..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23746149.2023.2165452](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23746149.2023.2165452%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534912963%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3d6TPcznJN2ZTKFZyhoA0Z&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987408&usg=AOvVaw3G4urbTdxN6B9vXoCMxwQ_) 15. bridging quantum mechanics and computing: a primer for software engineers - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16154](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16154%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534913317%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1lLJYW-4JYKCbihadPfwAo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987480&usg=AOvVaw0krOIEeTyT1ufBpvwP9H2n) 16. Quantum Mechanics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed April 9, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534913633%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw08rX8gBCOMFUU6sIEokvdn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987547&usg=AOvVaw0VgSoTE0iEt8XNfC1T1Pog) 17. Quantum Mechanics: Unveiling the Mysteries of the Microscopic Universe, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://openmedscience.com/quantum-mechanics-unveiling-the-mysteries-of-the-microscopic-universe/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://openmedscience.com/quantum-mechanics-unveiling-the-mysteries-of-the-microscopic-universe/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534914053%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2wWfIHEdCGQ7bbbTq6q0H3&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987622&usg=AOvVaw1QA6RheU48qnzslHYRSfIT) 18. Quantum mechanics - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534914351%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2AE3g4HHQW57HaUUOCOF0x&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987699&usg=AOvVaw2SOEKIV036E2JweCtZKM3v) 19. Quantum Machine Learning: A Review and Current Status - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345190379_Quantum_Machine_Learning_A_Review_and_Current_Status](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/345190379_Quantum_Machine_Learning_A_Review_and_Current_Status%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534914772%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3NWkl6g8HOpdSEhUbK9Xba&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987772&usg=AOvVaw2r5Tj2Z3t_5SvbrCdMxUkH) 20. Quantum Physics and Its Implications Part I - Mind & Life Institute, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mindandlife.org/dialogue/mind-brain-and-matter/quantum-physics-and-its-implications-part-i/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mindandlife.org/dialogue/mind-brain-and-matter/quantum-physics-and-its-implications-part-i/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534915189%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3sgwvmRJGLM0Sc24EnDGvt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987854&usg=AOvVaw1s5GwpbIKFqAqaqlbjOV-3) 21. The Basics of Quantum Mechanics - THE QUANTUM LÄND, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://thequantumlaend.de/basic-tutorial/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://thequantumlaend.de/basic-tutorial/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534915495%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw15ZZb5X2VK5pTLNBpF19zT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534987940&usg=AOvVaw0anFbKsqWrdF-y_WN4smig) 22. Understanding Quantum Mechanics #2: Superposition and Entanglement, accessed April 9, 2025, [http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/05/understanding-quantum-mechanics-2.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/05/understanding-quantum-mechanics-2.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534915877%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1mweBEmv3x6oN0ppXvG6ac&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988012&usg=AOvVaw1pwlXxrgLfquCEH7PiAxAj) 23. arxiv.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10726](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10726%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534916184%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2JWfgO0DpKkF9V7RRQ5zgq&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988081&usg=AOvVaw0FdmVRhImBoECHIxNSjyzf) 24. Quantum Logic | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/qu-logic/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/qu-logic/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534916482%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2x-u-52MiZWQXUHR2B840n&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988152&usg=AOvVaw0lgcpLQ5clvmgqU5MPwdqA) 25. Exploring the key concepts of quantum mechanics - Innovation News Network, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/exploring-the-key-concepts-of-quantum-mechanics/51254/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/exploring-the-key-concepts-of-quantum-mechanics/51254/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534916954%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw13MkQBziDDI49CTYov2t6B&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988229&usg=AOvVaw2AP7zyDW2Ghchvv_D7BuF6) 26. Interpretations of quantum mechanics - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534917480%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2-rnRJ_NhtOxeRuoGCIOcD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988309&usg=AOvVaw1_r-g1KJzEays6zqqGS_wx) 27. Unveiling the Fifth Dimension: A Novel Approach to Quantum Mechanics - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/7/1/8](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/7/1/8%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534917988%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw00j1DYK9b-zCHmD50UEQLu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988390&usg=AOvVaw102jRCPxJ4BKVJixcvUZSu) 28. Top Research Papers on Quantum Mechanics - Paperguide, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://paperguide.ai/papers/top/research-papers-quantum-mechanics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://paperguide.ai/papers/top/research-papers-quantum-mechanics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534918551%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2CoOlSXD3jeeG9yv46hTOV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988462&usg=AOvVaw1a0M1UbHjcvGXF1zr7T3jk) 29. Interpreting Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Random Discontinuous Motion of Particles - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8987/1/Shan_Gao_-_PhD_thesis.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8987/1/Shan_Gao_-_PhD_thesis.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534919181%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2nf5_lbdM6sUxpKQ4FOa97&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988542&usg=AOvVaw12VoPTLHr56Vb4HsDaBAeY) 30. Quantum Realities: A Comparative Analysis of Interpretations Addressing the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics - The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2201&context=student_scholarship](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D2201%2526context%253Dstudent_scholarship%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534919965%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2HtP4t3xwBytP_PCgYhowc&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988632&usg=AOvVaw2VCckMZuCTGQCvjmMnJrG5) 31. Why I Believe Consciousness and Quantum Physics Are Deeply Interconnected - Reddit, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/1gfl7rv/why_i_believe_consciousness_and_quantum_physics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/1gfl7rv/why_i_believe_consciousness_and_quantum_physics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534920665%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Nyx8e_aK4RjslL0Jfi73q&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988734&usg=AOvVaw1A6SMDR3qh6qlIPzMbkn-b) 32. (PDF) Bridging the Gap: Towards a Physics of Information and AI’s..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376613489_Bridging_the_Gap_Towards_a_Physics_of_Information_and_AI's_Emergent_Phenomena](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/376613489_Bridging_the_Gap_Towards_a_Physics_of_Information_and_AI%26%2339;s_Emergent_Phenomena%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534921449%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VkR1Y831siCRO_RpNqs3G&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988821&usg=AOvVaw2VGF99iQGNYaXm9TkLgW-p) 33. Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-issues/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-issues/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534921972%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1de8FrLpsnzjst6U0TvzRD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988915&usg=AOvVaw1yPcyLoMG4-64p-y0z4gjE) 34. Main concepts in philosophy of quantum information - PhilArchive, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://philarchive.org/archive/PENMCI-2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philarchive.org/archive/PENMCI-2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534922455%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3BYCxEwDpTN0Zt84-CjkS_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534988990&usg=AOvVaw1OeMgN6tLMof6_SxqEOVQu) 35. Quantum Mechanics as a Constructive Theory - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/161](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/161%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534922920%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0yzFiiIcttsWQdiIIYyew2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989062&usg=AOvVaw3ys4ypwwjSP2Vm3hNnlc17) 36. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? - The Information Philosopher, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr/EPRBohr.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr/EPRBohr.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534923510%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1SoSNDuDEhGaDXfNU2upjU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989146&usg=AOvVaw0OTmC23SqFFl-W9kLe75BL) 37. Philosophy of artificial intelligence - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534924014%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw14mVPAiLWMeklD4nqmToRu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989237&usg=AOvVaw0WnG3b3MPdeXyRA54-Lt9e) 38. Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism - OSF, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://osf.io/tz6an_v1/download](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://osf.io/tz6an_v1/download%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534924474%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2JwobZQqU-mKYBrJXjRK8c&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989317&usg=AOvVaw25V1Kw-X6oDytxMw6HnCu2) 39. Understanding Robotic Control Systems - AZoRobotics, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=188](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID%253D188%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534925010%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0YEid-KqB1SnG_ZYr-TJir&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989399&usg=AOvVaw3ZmqFeVtfnSH8kCN-Js5JW) 40. Does a Mind Need a Body? - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177348/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177348/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534925494%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3AuQP8h83Fa1-3Yspp4OTt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989474&usg=AOvVaw03C4DHWZVTomkDU_Y3T4KT) 41. (PDF) Quantum-Inspired Energy Pattern Recognition with AI Using Pi (π), Euler Curvature, & Energy of System - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388411583_Quantum-Inspired_Energy_Pattern_Recognition_with_AI_Using_Pi_p_Euler_Curvature_Energy_of_System](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/388411583_Quantum-Inspired_Energy_Pattern_Recognition_with_AI_Using_Pi_p_Euler_Curvature_Energy_of_System%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534926382%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qQepJOm01QlxgprivxJOp&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989563&usg=AOvVaw0z6Rvfh4XkYxbSeRKu4jic) 42. Full article: A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2021.1907910](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2021.1907910%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534927043%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2grLFD13aME2JnpgFg8Aiy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989655&usg=AOvVaw0-wVWauFbNleFxu5YoXlM9) 43. Hard Problem of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534927577%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1C5rO6hj-ZFSIDWSPuN4-O&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989731&usg=AOvVaw0G8SUfKItDqr3zLj6aGFNT) 44. Philosophical Issues raised by Quantum Theory and its Interpretations - PhilSci-Archive, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20674/1/Philosophical%20Issues%20raised%20by%20Quantum%20Theory%20and%20its%20Interpretations%20%28final%29.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20674/1/Philosophical%252520Issues%252520raised%252520by%252520Quantum%252520Theory%252520and%252520its%252520Interpretations%252520%252528final%252529.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534928307%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0c3tJfxeRPx5pU-rT4IrPD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989820&usg=AOvVaw0oTWwgDsGYkvU-2BQlfnAj) 45. Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-07-20-301/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-07-20-301/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534928691%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2pJiomWfrXlmhXq9joP6pQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989920&usg=AOvVaw19PESeWm3oOAz5uZRYSWEg) 46. Discrete vs. Continuous Data: What Is The Difference? | Whatagraph, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://whatagraph.com/blog/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://whatagraph.com/blog/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534929076%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0dLBNueuv8ZiW1JO1kVW8h&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534989997&usg=AOvVaw3J6nJzk3ZKi3tE-x4qGUZE) 47. Discrete vs. Continuous Data: A Guide for Beginners - Coursera, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.coursera.org/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.coursera.org/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534929446%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1DdjrGltKaShr6n79-HFs6&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990074&usg=AOvVaw1Ckwb9EObYbeplaeA7-jLf) 48. Neural Networks: Binary vs. Discrete vs. Continuous Inputs - Baeldung, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.baeldung.com/cs/binary-vs-discrete-vs-continuous-inputs](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.baeldung.com/cs/binary-vs-discrete-vs-continuous-inputs%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534929818%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2DPkm8cIU93zCUwAo4C2uE&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990177&usg=AOvVaw1We9rtle6yynd4I8PlGFn2) 49. Discrete vs. continuous task environment: r/ArtificialInteligence - Reddit, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/hv0d2n/discrete_vs_continuous_task_environment/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/hv0d2n/discrete_vs_continuous_task_environment/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534930319%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3MW3FMbhU0Sng5V-psmtxO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990283&usg=AOvVaw3SisAQ6HUSH-Xp3_YrDMbh) 50. Continuous Knowledge Graphs for Neurosymbolic AI | by Mike..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://medium.com/@mike.dillinger/continuous-knowledge-graphs-for-neurosymbolic-ai-9000b4aa0eb7](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://medium.com/@mike.dillinger/continuous-knowledge-graphs-for-neurosymbolic-ai-9000b4aa0eb7%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534930777%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw29xghU3BzB-3F7Ws5mUE2N&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990366&usg=AOvVaw1zyraD2ZQ0ShQbwaMDU85I) 51. [2201.01233] Discrete and continuous representations and processing in deep learning: Looking forward - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01233](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01233%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534931130%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1FcI0m7_V_YXCe3JlklZb_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990448&usg=AOvVaw22cPS7AA-_RcFx-b192XvC) 52. Review on System Identification, Control, and Optimization Based on Artificial Intelligence, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/952](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/952%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534931480%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0sYoRQe8NuaIPv9-SteT4Y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990519&usg=AOvVaw3iiy3l7lwXBIiuVYfoO3Sn) 53. Deep Learning for Decision Making and Control - YouTube, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtMyH_--vnU](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v%253DEtMyH_--vnU%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534931779%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3K782kQ1XbOI5e2m34vdpG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990611&usg=AOvVaw3YmFxcfmfgqBQANoiNnGFS) 54. Using First Principles for Deep Learning and Model-Based Control of Soft Robots - Frontiers, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.654398/full](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.654398/full%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534932198%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0ejkq5eS8XJqGFx1Z0gpm_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990695&usg=AOvVaw3OsRR2m_KLvtMLRwT-wIFL) 55. en.wikipedia.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information#:~:text=In%20a%20sense%2C%20continuous%2Dvariable,of%20qubits%20are%20finite%2Ddimensional.](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information%2523:~:text%253DIn%252520a%252520sense%25252C%252520continuous%25252Dvariable,of%252520qubits%252520are%252520finite%25252Ddimensional.%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534932671%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1J3B5i3ISDiCyHufts_QI6&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534990784&usg=AOvVaw2Q2b_weCwSadZdvWGQvzAV) 56. Continuous-variable quantum information - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534933040%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw24MRmMtIcQR4A23QXwz5Lz&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991068&usg=AOvVaw26W-N-NB47xxMHpkk_v7dH) 57. Resources in quantum computation for discrete and continuous-variable systems - Chalmers Research, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://research.chalmers.se/publication/541176/file/541176_Fulltext.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://research.chalmers.se/publication/541176/file/541176_Fulltext.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534933487%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1b0BPutBWvclUX4BXCBBYi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991153&usg=AOvVaw1Q7Wc2iVv7AJonxdNKf9nY) 58. Quantum Computation and Information Using Continuous Variables, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10842](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10842%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534933837%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2IbWNq9L9GegXhhICo75Zv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991232&usg=AOvVaw3BTkXUyIAmbbNbPHDk7i0O) 59. Hybrid Continuous-Discrete Variable Quantum Computing..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://yuanliu.group/projects/hybrid-qip/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://yuanliu.group/projects/hybrid-qip/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534934158%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1yauDCsLfBdgeXINbqUcO9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991307&usg=AOvVaw2OTzdh5TzFW0nMEqtwDj3y) 60. A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerance - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.11351](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.11351%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534934548%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2NBZrzKqdAy-Mf7BlHsNjP&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991380&usg=AOvVaw3NZNy4oj4hY543wC8x6VHs) 61. A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerance, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2401.11351v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2401.11351v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534934940%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2BsuQz2qMJhOevViVZDfX4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991452&usg=AOvVaw0PO82v0oxRQianwwIkBeB4) 62. Machine Learning Applications of Quantum Computing: A Review - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13262](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13262%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534935358%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0eUaT_kH8Bju4nrbCHCw0e&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991525&usg=AOvVaw0jjeMbtdQu3fvWj3T-AT4n) 63. A Unified Theory of Binary Reality: Quantum Foundations of Dual-Plane Existence, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.devstrike.net/topic/6369-a-unified-theory-of-binary-reality-quantum-foundations-of-dual-plane-existence/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.devstrike.net/topic/6369-a-unified-theory-of-binary-reality-quantum-foundations-of-dual-plane-existence/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744166534935890%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2YVnxa1vf4eG_F34VajHSe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744166534991600&usg=AOvVaw3ORdFRBgE9P29ueDLkXM-r)