AI, QM, and Information Convergence # Evaluating the Coevolutionary Convergence of AI and Quantum Mechanics as Information States: A Critical Analysis ## I. Introduction A compelling, albeit speculative, hypothesis posits a potential “coevolutionary convergence” between the scientific understanding of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly neural networks, and Quantum Mechanics (QM). This convergence is proposed to be driven by an increasing tendency within both fields to conceptualize their subjects—intelligence and physical reality, respectively—as fundamentally constituted or described by “information states.” The hypothesis further suggests this convergence might find a physical basis or exemplar in quantum computational processes occurring within brain microtubules, as theorized by the Penrose-Hameroff Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) model.1 These processes, in turn, are situated within a broader cosmological framework where the universe itself is considered fundamentally information-theoretic, echoing ideas like Wheeler’s “it from bit” or the Holographic Principle.3 This report aims to provide a rigorous, expert-level evaluation of the scientific coherence, conceptual clarity, and empirical plausibility of this complex metaheuristic. Acknowledging the highly interdisciplinary and speculative nature of the proposition, the analysis will critically examine the key components and linkages asserted: the notion of coevolution applied to scientific paradigms, the concept of “information states” across AI and QM, the specifics and scientific standing of the Orch OR theory, the foundations of information-theoretic universe models, potential parallels in information processing between neural networks and quantum systems, and the viability of Orch OR as a bridge connecting these domains. The analysis will proceed by systematically addressing seven key aspects corresponding to the user’s query, drawing upon current scientific understanding and relevant research literature. The structure will follow these points, beginning with an examination of the coevolutionary perspective, delving into the Orch OR theory and its critique, exploring information-centric cosmology and AI-QM parallels, evaluating the proposed microtubule link, and culminating in a synthesized assessment of the overall coherence and plausibility of the user’s metaheuristic feedback loop. ## II. Coevolutionary Perspectives on AI and QM as Information States The user’s hypothesis employs the concept of “coevolution” to describe the relationship between the development of scientific understanding in AI and QM. Evaluating this requires defining coevolution in relevant contexts and critically assessing its applicability to scientific paradigms, particularly concerning the notion of “information states.” ### Defining “Coevolution” in Science and Technology The term “coevolution,” originating in biology to describe the reciprocal evolutionary influence between interacting species, has been adapted to characterize the dynamic interplay between human society and technological development.5 Historical examples include the profound societal shifts accompanying the Industrial Revolution, driven by technologies like the steam engine fueled by coal.7 Philosophers have long argued that technology is not merely a neutral tool but actively shapes human experience, choices, and societal structures.8 The advent of Artificial Intelligence has introduced unprecedented characteristics to this human-technology coevolution.5 AI systems, particularly machine learning models like recommender systems, engage in feedback loops with users: user choices generate data that trains AI models, which subsequently influence future user choices, creating a potentially endless cycle.5 This interaction occurs at immense scale and speed, facilitated by “big data” and the capacity for AI systems to be retrained with minimal human oversight, leading to rapid, complex, and often unintended systemic outcomes.5 AI acts not just as a tool but as an active participant molding human thought and behavior.6 ### Applying “Coevolution” to Scientific Understanding (AI & QM) While the coevolutionary dynamic between AI technology and society is evident 5, applying this concept to the scientific understanding within AI and QM requires careful consideration. It is crucial to distinguish between the coevolution of technologies and societal practices versus the evolution of fundamental scientific paradigms and concepts. Potential influences between the conceptual development of AI and QM can be explored: - Implicit Influences: It is conceivable that the counter-intuitive nature of QM—phenomena like superposition, entanglement, and the observer effect 9—has subtly broadened the conceptual landscape for researchers in AI and cognitive science. QM challenged classical notions of determinism and locality 17, potentially encouraging explorations of uncertainty, probabilistic reasoning, and complex system dynamics beyond purely classical computational frameworks. Some research explicitly integrates quantum principles into models of cognition, suggesting QM might offer insights into how humans process ambiguity or make judgments.18 - Explicit Influences: More concretely, the fields influence each other methodologically and conceptually. AI techniques, particularly machine learning, are increasingly employed to analyze complex quantum data, optimize quantum experiments, design quantum circuits, and even discover new quantum protocols or states.20 Conversely, concepts from QM are being explicitly imported into AI to develop new computational paradigms. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) aim to leverage quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement to potentially achieve speedups or enhanced capabilities for AI tasks.12 This includes developing quantum algorithms for classical AI problems (e.g., optimization, pattern recognition) and exploring AI architectures based on quantum principles. However, a degree of asymmetry exists in this interaction. While QM concepts are actively seeding new approaches in AI (QML/QNNs), the influence of AI on the foundational understanding of QM appears less direct. AI provides powerful tools for analysis and simulation 20, but it does not seem to be fundamentally reshaping core QM concepts like the nature of the wave function or the measurement problem, at least not currently. This asymmetry challenges the notion of a balanced “coevolution” of the fundamental understanding within the two fields, suggesting perhaps a more unidirectional application of QM principles to AI, complemented by the use of AI tools in QM research. ### The “Information State” Concept The user’s hypothesis hinges on the idea that both AI and QM increasingly treat their subjects as “information states.” Examining this requires defining how information is represented and processed in each domain. - In AI: Artificial intelligence, broadly defined, aims to build systems capable of tasks requiring human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and perception.40 - Symbolic AI: This classical approach represents knowledge explicitly using symbols, rules (e.g., if-then statements), and logical formalisms like predicate calculus or semantic networks.43 Reasoning involves manipulating these symbols according to predefined rules via an inference engine.43 Information is localized and human-interpretable.48 - Connectionist AI (Neural Networks): This approach, inspired by the brain’s structure, models intelligence as an emergent property of interconnected networks of simple processing units (neurons).43 Information is represented implicitly and distributed across the connection weights and activation patterns of the network.43 Learning occurs through adjusting these weights based on data, enabling pattern recognition and generalization.44 Deep learning involves networks with multiple layers, extracting hierarchical features.51 - Continuous vs. Discrete Information in AI: A debate exists regarding the nature of information representation in AI. While the underlying digital hardware is discrete, connectionist models often use continuous values for weights and activations.53 Tasks can involve discrete inputs/outputs (e.g., classifications, tokens in Large Language Models - LLMs) or continuous ones (e.g., control signals in robotics 55). Some argue LLMs represent a “continuous form of knowledge,” but others counter that they fundamentally process discrete tokens, with continuity arising from mathematical re-scaling of counts into probabilities.57 Discrete data is countable with clear gaps, often visualized with bar charts or pie charts, while continuous data is measurable within a range, often shown in histograms or line graphs.54 Hybrid approaches combining discrete and continuous representations are also explored.53 - In QM: Quantum mechanics describes physical systems using mathematical constructs that encode information about potential measurement outcomes. - The Quantum State (Wave Function): The state of a quantum system is represented by a vector (ψ) in a complex Hilbert space.15 This wave function contains information about the system’s properties (e.g., position, momentum) in the form of probability amplitudes, which are complex numbers.9 - Probabilistic Information: QM is fundamentally probabilistic.9 The Born rule states that the probability of obtaining a specific measurement outcome is given by the square of the absolute value of the corresponding probability amplitude in the wave function.15 - Measurement and Collapse: The act of measurement extracts information about an observable, yielding one of its possible eigenvalues with probabilities determined by the wave function.15 According to interpretations like Copenhagen, the measurement causes the wave function to “collapse” into the state corresponding to the outcome.9 - Information-Centric Interpretations: Some interpretations view QM as being fundamentally about information. Quantum Bayesianism (QBism) treats quantum states as subjective degrees of belief held by an observer.15 Relational QM posits states are observer-dependent.15 Information ontologies like Wheeler’s “it from bit” suggest reality itself arises from information.4 Quantum information theory provides tools to quantify quantum information (qubits, entanglement) and studies its processing.23 - Contrast with Physical Reality Views: These information-centric views contrast with interpretations that see the wave function or other elements as directly representing an objective physical reality, independent of observers or information.15 The premise of a convergence based on “information states” encounters a significant challenge due to the semantic ambiguity of the term. The nature of information in standard AI and QM differs profoundly. Current AI (excluding QAI) processes classical information, represented by bits and manipulated algorithmically on physical hardware like CPUs or GPUs.77 Although connectionist models use distributed representations, the underlying information is classical. In contrast, QM deals with quantum information, encoded in complex probability amplitudes within wave functions, exhibiting properties like superposition and entanglement that have no classical analogue.15 Furthermore, the very relationship between quantum information and physical reality is a subject of ongoing debate among various interpretations.64 Simply labeling both AI models and quantum systems as “information states” risks conflating these distinct concepts. Any meaningful convergence would require either a deeper, unifying theory of information (as hinted at by “It from Bit” or similar frameworks) or a restriction of the claim to a purely methodological or mathematical analogy, rather than an ontological one. Moreover, the concept of an “information state” often abstracts away the physical substrate. AI systems, however advanced, rely on physical hardware for implementation.77 Their capabilities are constrained and enabled by this hardware. Similarly, QM is fundamentally a theory describing the behavior of physical matter and energy at the smallest scales.17 Philosophical arguments also suggest that embodiment might be crucial for consciousness and potentially intelligence.79 An exclusively “information state” perspective risks neglecting the critical role of the physical substrate—be it silicon chips, quantum phenomena, or biological structures like microtubules—in grounding and enabling the processing of that information. The Orch OR theory, discussed next, attempts precisely to bridge this gap by proposing a specific physical, quantum substrate for information processing related to consciousness.81 This highlights a central tension between abstract informational views and physically grounded perspectives that the user’s overarching hypothesis seeks to navigate. ## III. The Orch OR Theory: Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules The Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) theory, developed by physicist Sir Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff in the mid-1990s, proposes a specific mechanism for consciousness based on quantum physics operating within the brain’s neurons.2 ### Origins and Motivation The theory arose from the convergence of two distinct lines of inquiry. Roger Penrose, motivated by Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, argued that human understanding possesses non-algorithmic capabilities that classical computation cannot replicate.1 He sought a physical process beyond standard computation that could account for mathematical insight and consciousness, proposing that this process must involve quantum mechanics and specifically a form of objective wave function collapse linked to quantum gravity.1 Stuart Hameroff, studying the function of the neuronal cytoskeleton and the mechanisms of anesthesia, became interested in microtubules (MTs)—protein polymers forming the structural scaffolding within cells—as potential information processing units.2 He observed their complex, seemingly intelligent behavior in cellular processes like mitosis and speculated about their computational capacity, wondering if they could be relevant to consciousness and serve as the target sites for anesthetic molecules that selectively abolish consciousness.81 Upon reading Penrose’s book “The Emperor’s New Mind,” Hameroff proposed microtubules as the biological structures capable of hosting the quantum computations Penrose required.83 Penrose agreed, finding the geometric lattice structure of microtubules suitable, leading to the collaborative development of the Orch OR theory.81 ### Core Claims The Orch OR theory makes several specific claims: 1. Microtubules as Quantum Processors: The central tenet is that microtubules within the brain’s neurons function as quantum computers.1 They are described as having dynamical lattice structures potentially suitable for quantum computation.1 2. Tubulin Qubits: The individual protein subunits composing microtubules, called tubulin, are proposed to act as quantum bits (qubits).84 Each tubulin protein can exist in at least two distinct conformational states, and Orch OR posits that these can exist in a quantum superposition of both states simultaneously.1 The physical basis for these quantum states is suggested to involve quantum dipole oscillations (e.g., van der Waals forces) within hydrophobic pockets containing aromatic amino acid rings (like tryptophan), which are abundant in tubulin.81 These electron clouds are considered friendly to quantum effects.81 3. Orchestration: Quantum computations involving tubulin qubits within microtubules are not random but are “orchestrated”—influenced and organized—by classical inputs, primarily synaptic activity impinging on the neuron.1 Memory stored in microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) might also play a role in this orchestration, biasing the quantum computation.1 This allows the quantum processing to be integrated with overall neural function. 4. Objective Reduction (OR): Unlike standard quantum computing proposals where quantum coherence is lost due to environmental interaction (decoherence), Orch OR proposes that the quantum superposition state collapses via a specific physical mechanism proposed by Penrose, termed Objective Reduction (OR).1 This is conceived as a self-collapse process inherent to the universe’s structure, linked to quantum gravity.1 Penrose argues that quantum superposition involves a separation of mass from itself, creating conflicting spacetime curvatures—tiny “blisters” or separations in the fabric of spacetime geometry.1 These separations are considered unstable. 5. Penrose’s OR Threshold: The theory quantifies the threshold for self-collapse. A quantum superposition with gravitational self-energy E_G (related to the amount of mass/spacetime separation involved) will spontaneously reduce to a classical state after a time T given by the uncertainty principle relation: T ≈ ħ / E_G.1 Larger, more significant superpositions (larger E_G) collapse faster. 6. Consciousness as Orch OR Events: Each objective reduction (OR) event occurring in orchestrated microtubules is proposed to correspond to a discrete moment of conscious experience or subjective feeling (“qualia”).1 The outcome of the OR process is considered “non-computable,” meaning it is not determined by any algorithm. Instead, it is influenced by information embedded in the fundamental Planck-scale geometry of spacetime, potentially providing a basis for genuine understanding and free will, beyond deterministic or random processes.1 7. Connection to Brain Activity: The classical outcomes of Orch OR events are proposed to regulate neuronal functions, such as modulating synaptic strengths (plasticity) and influencing the firing of action potentials.1 Furthermore, it’s suggested that faster quantum vibrations within microtubules (e.g., terahertz or gigahertz) could generate “beat frequencies” through interference patterns, potentially corresponding to the slower, measurable EEG rhythms associated with consciousness.85 A distinctive feature of Orch OR is its ambition to bridge phenomena across vastly different scales of reality. It attempts to forge a direct link between the most fundamental level of physics—Planck-scale spacetime geometry, proposed as the origin of the OR collapse mechanism—and the molecular scale of protein dynamics within tubulin qubits and microtubule lattices.1 This quantum activity at the subcellular level is then connected upwards to the cellular level of neuronal firing and synaptic regulation, and ultimately to the macroscopic level of integrated brain activity (like EEG rhythms) and the emergent phenomenon of subjective conscious experience.82 This multi-scale integration is arguably the theory’s most unique aspect, but simultaneously represents its greatest challenge, as the proposed connections at each level must be scientifically validated. Furthermore, unlike many philosophical or purely theoretical approaches to consciousness, Orch OR proposes a specific physical mechanism and location. It identifies microtubules as the locus of quantum computation 81, tubulin proteins (specifically their conformational or electronic states) as the qubits 84, Penrose’s objective reduction as the collapse mechanism yielding conscious moments 1, and links this to observable neurophysiological phenomena like synaptic function and anesthetic action.81 This specificity provides concrete targets for experimental investigation, making the theory, in principle, more empirically testable and falsifiable than many alternatives.81 This testability is a significant feature, even though the current empirical evidence remains highly debated, as discussed in the next section. ## IV. Scientific Standing of the Orch OR Theory The Orch OR theory, despite its detailed formulation, remains highly controversial within the scientific community. Its evaluation requires examining the evidence presented by proponents alongside the significant criticisms raised by physicists, neuroscientists, and philosophers. ### Arguments and Evidence Presented by Proponents Proponents, primarily Hameroff and Penrose, cite several lines of reasoning and evidence: - Microtubule Suitability: They emphasize the unique structure of microtubules—cylindrical lattices of tubulin proteins—as potentially ideal for information processing and quantum computation.1 The presence of numerous aromatic amino acid rings within tubulin, creating hydrophobic, non-polar pockets, is highlighted as conducive to quantum effects like dipole oscillations (van der Waals forces) and potentially shielding quantum states.81 - Anesthesia Mechanism: A key argument involves general anesthetics, which reversibly abolish consciousness while sparing non-conscious brain functions. Hameroff proposes that anesthetics act by binding within these hydrophobic pockets in tubulin, dampening the quantum dipole oscillations (suggested to be in the terahertz range) necessary for consciousness according to Orch OR.81 Experimental evidence showing anesthetic molecules binding to tubulin and affecting microtubule resonance properties or delayed luminescence has been presented as support.81 A recent preprint analysis claims correlations between microtubule dynamics, neural activity, and the suppression of high-frequency EEG oscillations by isoflurane, interpreting these findings as consistent with Orch OR.92 - Observed Quantum Vibrations: The discovery of quantum vibrational coherence (e.g., in the megahertz range, potentially extending to gigahertz or terahertz) persisting for significant durations (nanoseconds or longer) in microtubules, even at physiological temperatures, is cited as direct evidence supporting the possibility of quantum effects in MTs.85 Experiments involving delayed luminescence and potential superradiance in microtubules are also mentioned.81 - Explanatory Scope: Orch OR is argued to provide a framework for addressing the “hard problem” of consciousness (why we have subjective experience) by grounding qualia in the fundamental physics of spacetime geometry via Penrose OR.1 It also offers a non-algorithmic mechanism potentially related to understanding and free will.1 Hameroff has described it as the “most rigorous, comprehensive and successfully-tested theory of consciousness”.85 Proponents point to a list of testable predictions made in 1998, claiming several have been confirmed and none refuted.85 ### Major Criticisms and Counterarguments Orch OR has faced persistent and strong criticism: - The Decoherence Argument: The most significant challenge comes from physics. Critics argue that the brain’s environment—characterized as “warm, wet, and noisy”—is fundamentally inhospitable to the delicate quantum coherence required for computation.93 Physicist Max Tegmark calculated in 2000 that quantum superposition states in microtubules would decohere due to interactions with surrounding water molecules and ions on extremely short timescales (femtoseconds, 10^-15 s), orders of magnitude faster than the timescales relevant for neural processing (milliseconds, 10^-3 s).93 This suggests quantum computation as proposed by Orch OR is physically impossible in the brain. Neuroscientists Christof Koch and Klaus Hepp echoed this, finding no need for quantum coherence in neurophysiology.93 - Rebuttal to Decoherence: Hameroff and colleagues countered that Tegmark’s calculation used parameters inconsistent with the Orch OR model (e.g., larger superposition separations).93 They proposed several biological mechanisms that could potentially shield microtubule quantum states from environmental decoherence, including screening by the Debye layer of counterions, ordering of water by surrounding actin gels, the use of metabolic energy to maintain order, and the possibility of quantum error correction inherent in the microtubule lattice structure.93 These rebuttals led them to calculate much longer coherence times (though still falling short of the required milliseconds).93 However, these proposed shielding mechanisms are themselves speculative and lack definitive experimental validation. The decoherence problem thus remains a central point of contention. - Biological Plausibility Issues: Neuroscientists and biologists have questioned various aspects of the proposed biological mechanisms. Criticisms include the lack of evidence for the required Bose-Einstein or Frohlich condensates in tubulin, calculations suggesting microtubules can only support weak coherence (e.g., 8 MHz, far from the proposed faster oscillations), arguments against the feasibility of aromatic rings acting as quantum switches, the potentially prohibitive energy cost of tubulin conformational changes driven by GTP hydrolysis, and a failure to explain basic neuronal functions like probabilistic neurotransmitter release.93 There’s also skepticism about whether quantum states in microtubules, even if they existed, could meaningfully influence cognition and behavior.86 - Explanatory Power and Necessity: Philosophers and scientists have questioned the theory’s explanatory value. Patricia Churchland famously dismissed it as akin to invoking “pixie dust in the synapses”.93 David Chalmers argued that invoking quantum mechanics doesn’t inherently solve the hard problem of consciousness any more effectively than classical neuroscience; the question of why specific physical processes (quantum or classical) give rise to subjective experience remains.93 Furthermore, alternative, more conventional explanations exist for phenomena cited in support of Orch OR, such as the action of anesthetics primarily through effects on neuronal membranes and ion channels.91 The preprint claiming supportive evidence also explicitly acknowledges these alternative, non-quantum interpretations.92 - Status of Empirical Evidence: Despite proponents’ claims, there is no widely accepted, direct experimental proof of functional quantum computation occurring in microtubules or of the specific Penrose OR mechanism.86 Evidence cited, such as observed vibrations or anesthetic effects on microtubules, is often indirect, correlational rather than causal, and open to classical interpretations.81 Some experimental searches for predicted effects, like radiation associated with certain versions of OR (Diósi-OR, distinct from Penrose-OR), have yielded null results, although the interpretation of these results is also debated.88 - Foundational Arguments: The philosophical arguments underpinning Orch OR, particularly Penrose’s reliance on Gödel’s theorems to argue against computationalism, are themselves subject to significant debate and criticism within logic, computer science, and philosophy.93 ### Summary Table: Evaluation of Orch OR Aspects | | | | | |---|---|---|---| |Claim/Aspect|Supporting Arguments/Evidence (Snippets)|Criticisms/Counterarguments (Snippets)|Current Status/Assessment| |Quantum Coherence in MTs|MT structure; Aromatic rings; Observed vibrations (MHz/THz?); Delayed luminescence/superradiance 81|Decoherence (“Warm, wet, noisy”); Tegmark’s calculation (fs timescale); Koch/Hepp skepticism; Calculations suggesting only weak (MHz) coherence 93|Highly contested. Proponents suggest shielding/error correction 93, but definitive proof of sufficient functional coherence is lacking. Central challenge.| |Tubulin as Qubits|Conformational states; Dipole oscillations in aromatic rings 81|Aromatic rings delocalized (can’t switch?); Energy cost of conformational changes; Lack of evidence for required condensates 93|Proposed mechanism is specific but lacks direct experimental verification of qubit functionality and superposition.| |Role of Orchestration|Synaptic inputs; MAPs; Integration with neural function 1|Mechanism details unclear; How exactly do synapses/MAPs ‘orchestrate’ quantum states?|Conceptually important for linking quantum level to brain function, but mechanistic details are underspecified and lack empirical support.| |Penrose OR Mechanism|Link to quantum gravity/spacetime geometry; Non-computability 1|Speculative physics; Lack of experimental evidence for OR; Null results for related D-OR radiation 88|Highly speculative aspect based on proposed quantum gravity effects; no direct evidence. Distinction from standard decoherence is crucial but unproven.| |Link to Consciousness|Addresses “hard problem”; Qualia from Planck scale; Non-algorithmic understanding/free will 1|Doesn’t inherently solve hard problem (Chalmers); “Pixie dust” criticism (Churchland); Philosophical basis (Gödel argument) contested 93|Provides a potential physical basis for consciousness, appealing to some, but criticized for lack of explanatory power and reliance on contested ideas.| |Anesthesia Mechanism|Anesthetics bind in MT pockets; Dampen quantum oscillations; Correlate with loss of consciousness 81|Alternative mechanisms (ion channels, membranes) are well-established and potentially sufficient; Quantum effects not conclusively demonstrated 91|Anesthetic binding to tubulin is known, but the claim that this causes loss of consciousness via disrupting quantum effects is specific to Orch OR and unproven.| |Empirical Evidence|MT vibrations; Anesthetic effects on MTs; EEG correlations; Claimed confirmed predictions 81|Lack of direct proof of quantum computation; Evidence often indirect/correlational; Alternative interpretations exist; Criticisms of specific claims 86|Evidence remains suggestive at best, indirect, and contested. No “smoking gun” proof has emerged.| The debate surrounding Orch OR often appears deadlocked on the issue of decoherence. Proponents point to potential biological mechanisms that might protect quantum states 93, while critics, relying on standard physical calculations, argue that such protection is highly improbable in the brain’s environment.93 Without conclusive experimental demonstration of robust, functional quantum coherence within microtubules at physiological temperatures, the theory struggles to overcome this fundamental objection from physics. The burden of proof rests heavily on providing such evidence. Furthermore, much of the empirical data cited in support establishes correlations rather than causation. For instance, showing that anesthetics affect both microtubules and consciousness 81 does not prove that the effect on consciousness occurs via the proposed quantum mechanism in microtubules. Alternative causal pathways, such as anesthetic effects on ion channels, remain plausible and arguably more established explanations.91 Disentangling correlation from causation is a critical challenge for validating the theory.92 Finally, the reception of Orch OR appears influenced by pre-existing philosophical commitments. Researchers seeking a non-materialist or non-computational explanation for consciousness may find its link to fundamental physics and non-algorithmic processes appealing.1 Conversely, those adhering to more standard physicalist or computationalist views often express strong skepticism regarding its necessity and plausibility.93 This suggests that the ongoing debate transcends purely scientific evaluation, touching upon deeper disagreements about the nature of mind, reality, and scientific explanation itself. ## V. Information-Theoretic Frameworks of the Universe The user’s hypothesis situates the potential AI-QM convergence within a universe that might be fundamentally informational. This necessitates examining theories that posit information as a primary constituent or descriptor of reality, particularly Digital Physics, the Holographic Principle, and Wheeler’s “It from Bit.” ### Concept Overview These frameworks challenge the traditional view of matter and energy as the ultimate foundation of reality, suggesting instead that information plays a more fundamental role.3 In these perspectives, the physical world, its properties, and its laws emerge from, or are best described by, underlying informational processes or constraints. ### Digital Physics This hypothesis proposes that the universe, at its most fundamental level, operates like a giant computational system.3 Reality is seen as discrete, composed of fundamental units analogous to bits, and its evolution is governed by algorithmic rules, similar to a cellular automaton or a computer program.94 Physical laws are considered emergent properties of this underlying computation. Some proponents suggest the entire history and state of the universe could potentially be compressed into a relatively simple program, far shorter than a complete description of all its particles and fields.95 ### The Holographic Principle Originating from studies of black hole thermodynamics, the Holographic Principle suggests that the information content of any region of space is bounded not by its volume, but by the area of its boundary surface.3 The entropy of a black hole, found by Bekenstein and Hawking to be proportional to the area of its event horizon, represents the maximum information capacity for a region of that size.96 This principle implies that a physical system within a volume can be fully described by degrees of freedom residing on its lower-dimensional boundary, much like a 2D surface can encode a 3D holographic image.96 This has profound implications for quantum gravity, suggesting that a fundamental theory might be formulated in fewer dimensions than we perceive, and that spacetime itself might emerge from patterns of quantum information and entanglement on a boundary surface.3 Some interpretations link holography directly to non-local entanglement networks spanning the universe.96 ### Wheeler’s “It From Bit” Physicist John Archibald Wheeler famously encapsulated an information-centric view with the phrase “it from bit”.3 This hypothesis posits that every element of the physical world—every particle (“it”)—derives its existence and properties from observer-elicited answers to yes-or-no questions, or binary choices (“bits”).65 In this view, information, obtained through acts of measurement or observation, is the fundamental reality, while matter, energy, and spacetime are derivative concepts.4 The physical world has an “immaterial source” rooted in information.65 ### Relationship to Quantum Mechanics These information-theoretic frameworks are deeply intertwined with quantum mechanics: - Foundation in QM Concepts: They often draw inspiration from QM phenomena like the observer effect (where measurement influences the state), entanglement (non-local correlations), and the inherent probabilistic nature of quantum predictions.3 The “It from Bit” idea directly relates to the role of measurement in defining quantum reality. - Quantum Information Theory: The mathematical tools developed in quantum information theory, such as qubits, entanglement measures, and quantum computation concepts, provide a language and framework for exploring these ideas.3 The potential emergence of spacetime from quantum entanglement is a key area of research connecting these fields.3 - Interpretational Alignment: These frameworks resonate strongly with interpretations of QM that emphasize the role of information, knowledge, or the observer, such as Quantum Bayesianism (QBism), relational QM, or other information-ontological views.11 It is important to recognize that these information-centric views represent a spectrum regarding the ontological status of information. Wheeler’s “It from Bit” appears to place information as the primary substance from which physical reality emerges.4 Digital Physics posits a computational substrate underlying reality.94 The Holographic Principle, while profoundly linking information capacity to geometric area, is often interpreted as a principle constraining physical theories or revealing properties of quantum gravity, rather than necessarily claiming information is the sole fundamental substance.96 This distinction is crucial: is information the ultimate “stuff” of the universe, or is it the fundamental language or organizing principle governing the physical stuff? The user’s hypothesis, relying on “information states,” needs clarity on which interpretation is being assumed. Furthermore, these frameworks remain largely theoretical and speculative.3 While the Holographic Principle has significant support within theoretical physics, particularly from string theory and black hole thermodynamics 96, it lacks direct experimental verification. Digital Physics and “It from Bit” are even more speculative, representing hypotheses about the ultimate nature of reality rather than established physical theories. They face conceptual hurdles, such as reconciling the proposed discrete or computational nature of reality with the apparent continuity of spacetime in established theories like General Relativity and standard QM. Basing a metaheuristic, like the user’s, upon these speculative foundations introduces a significant degree of uncertainty. Additionally, adopting an information-theoretic view of the universe may implicitly align with certain interpretations of quantum mechanics over others. Frameworks emphasizing observer-elicited information (“It from Bit”) or observer-dependent boundaries (Holographic Principle in some contexts) resonate well with interpretations like QBism or relational QM.64 However, they might conflict with realist interpretations (e.g., Bohmian mechanics, Everettian Many-Worlds) that posit an objective physical reality existing independently of observation or information content.15 Therefore, the choice of an information-theoretic cosmological framework carries implicit assumptions about the interpretation of QM itself, adding another layer of complexity and potential contention to the user’s hypothesis. ## VI. Information Processing Parallels: AI Neural Networks and Quantum Systems A key element of the user’s hypothesis involves potential parallels between information processing in AI neural networks and quantum systems, viewed through the lens of “information states.” Understanding these parallels requires examining the distinct ways information is represented and manipulated in each domain. ### Information Representation and Processing in Connectionist AI (Neural Networks) Connectionist AI, particularly deep neural networks, processes information in a manner inspired by biological neural systems: - Distributed Representation: Unlike symbolic AI where knowledge is stored in discrete, localized symbols or rules 43, connectionist models represent information in a distributed fashion across the network.43 Knowledge is implicitly encoded in the pattern and strength (weights) of connections between numerous simple processing units (artificial neurons).43 - Learning via Weight Adjustment: Networks learn from data by iteratively adjusting these connection weights to minimize errors or achieve desired outputs.44 This process allows the network to recognize patterns, learn associations, and generalize to new inputs.44 Deep learning architectures use multiple layers to extract increasingly abstract and hierarchical features from the data.51 - Continuous and Discrete Aspects: While the underlying digital computation is discrete, the internal representations (weights, neuron activations) are typically treated as continuous variables.53 However, networks often process discrete inputs (e.g., pixels, words/tokens) and produce discrete outputs (e.g., classifications, next token predictions).57 The debate continues on whether the “continuous” nature of internal representations reflects a fundamental difference in knowledge type or merely a convenient mathematical description of processes ultimately grounded in discrete computations.53 Hybrid models explicitly combine both discrete and continuous elements.53 ### Information Processing in Quantum Systems (QM/QAI/QML) Quantum systems process information according to the principles of quantum mechanics, offering potentially different capabilities: - Superposition and Parallelism: The ability of qubits to exist in a superposition of multiple states simultaneously allows quantum computers to perform computations on many inputs or explore many possibilities in parallel.12 A system of N qubits can represent 2^N states simultaneously.12 - Entanglement: Quantum entanglement creates non-local correlations between qubits, where the state of one qubit is instantly linked to the state of another, regardless of distance.12 This interconnectedness is a key resource for quantum algorithms and communication protocols.15 - Probabilistic Information Encoding: The wave function (quantum state) encodes information probabilistically through complex numbers called amplitudes.9 Measurement outcomes are inherently probabilistic, determined by the Born rule (probability = |amplitude|²).15 - Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs): These are AI models based on quantum principles.28 Many are hybrid classical-quantum systems designed for near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices.32 They typically use parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) where quantum gates have adjustable parameters.20 Qubits function analogously to neurons, and quantum gates and measurements implement transformations and potentially activation functions.28 QNNs aim to leverage superposition and entanglement for tasks like classification, regression, or generative modeling.28 - Continuous Variables in Quantum Information (CVQI): An alternative to qubit-based (discrete variable, DV) quantum information uses continuous quantum variables, such as the amplitude and phase (quadratures) of electromagnetic fields or the position and momentum of harmonic oscillators.100 This involves infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces and techniques from quantum optics (e.g., squeezed states, homodyne detection).100 Hybrid CV-DV approaches seek to combine the advantages of both continuous and discrete quantum systems.100 ### Exploring Parallels and Analogies Several parallels, primarily formal or conceptual, have been drawn between these domains: - Distributed Representation: The distributed nature of information in connectionist networks 43 bears a superficial resemblance to the distributed nature of quantum information in entangled systems, where the state of the whole cannot be described by the states of the parts.15 Some philosophical explorations link the holographic principle (distributed information on boundaries) to distributed representations in the mind/brain.108 - Neural Networks and Quantum Field Theory (QFT): A growing body of research explores deep mathematical analogies between the structure of deep neural networks (particularly in the infinite-width limit) and concepts from QFT and statistical mechanics, such as the renormalization group.51 In these analogies, network layers can correspond to renormalization steps, network parameters (weights, biases) can be mapped to field configurations or couplings, and the network’s learning dynamics can resemble the flow of parameters under scale changes in QFT.52 This suggests that deep learning might implicitly leverage principles similar to those governing physical systems at different scales, or that QFT itself can be viewed as a form of information processing.109 - Quantum Concepts Informing Classical AI: Principles from quantum theory are being used conceptually to develop new classical AI algorithms or enhance interpretability. Examples include quantum cognition models applying superposition-like ideas to human decision-making 18 and quantum-inspired explainable AI (XAI) frameworks using Hilbert spaces and eigenvalue decomposition to analyze classical neural network layers.115 - Learning and State Update: At a very abstract level, one might draw an analogy between the iterative weight adjustments in neural network training (driven by minimizing a cost function based on data) 28 and the evolution of a quantum state under a Hamiltonian, potentially followed by measurement-induced updates. Both involve a system changing its state based on interactions or information. However, this parallel is highly speculative and ignores fundamental differences. It is crucial to distinguish between formal or mathematical analogies and claims of functional or physical equivalence. The striking mathematical similarities found between deep learning and QFT/renormalization group methods 52 demonstrate that similar mathematical structures can emerge in disparate complex systems. This might point towards universal principles governing information processing or statistical behavior. However, it does not imply that classical neural networks are physically performing quantum field computations, nor that quantum fields are literally learning like neural networks (though some speculate in this direction 52). Classical NNs operate on classical hardware according to classical physics (unless specifically designed as QNNs), while QM describes fundamentally non-classical phenomena. Over-interpreting these formal analogies as identities can be misleading. A significant difference lies in the role of non-linearity. Classical neural networks derive much of their expressive power from the application of non-linear activation functions at each neuron.43 In contrast, the fundamental evolution of a closed quantum system described by the Schrödinger equation is linear.14 Implementing non-linearity in QNNs typically requires introducing measurements (which are probabilistic and non-unitary) or proposing non-standard, non-linear quantum operators, presenting a challenge for directly replicating classical NN architectures.28 This difference in native processing—non-linear deterministic steps in classical NNs versus linear evolution and probabilistic measurement in QM—marks a fundamental divergence. Furthermore, the nature of information encoding differs. Classical NNs store information implicitly in real-valued connection weights, learned from data.43 The state of the network is deterministic given the weights and input. QM stores information probabilistically in complex-valued amplitudes within the wave function.15 Accessing this information through measurement fundamentally alters the state according to quantum probability rules.15 While both involve distributed information, the probabilistic, complex-valued, and measurement-sensitive nature of quantum information contrasts sharply with the deterministic, real-valued, and passively readable information encoded in the weights of classical NNs. These distinctions must be considered when evaluating claims of convergence based on shared “information state” concepts. ## VII. Evaluating the Proposed Microtubule Bridge The user’s hypothesis specifically proposes that the Orch OR theory, positing quantum computation in microtubules, acts as a bridge strengthening the argument for a convergence between AI (neural networks) and QM based on shared “information state” concepts. This claim requires critical evaluation. ### Arguments For (Conditional) If one were to assume, hypothetically, that Orch OR is a correct description of consciousness, one could construct arguments for its role as a bridge: - Biological Quantum Information Processing: Orch OR would provide the first concrete example of functional quantum information processing occurring within a biological system and being directly relevant to a high-level cognitive phenomenon (consciousness).1 Since consciousness is often linked to intelligence (the domain of AI) 80, this could suggest that quantum processes are not merely theoretical possibilities for computation but are actually utilized by nature for advanced cognitive functions. - Plausibility for Quantum AI: Demonstrating that the brain leverages quantum computation could lend biological plausibility to the broader endeavor of Quantum AI (QML/QNNs).20 If biology uses quantum effects for cognition, it strengthens the motivation to explore similar principles for artificial intelligence. - Grounding Information States: Orch OR explicitly links quantum information states (tubulin superpositions) to a specific physical substrate (microtubules) and potentially to fundamental physics (Penrose OR linked to spacetime geometry).1 This could be seen as providing a physical grounding for the abstract notion of “information states” in the context of cognition, seemingly connecting the QM and AI domains via a concrete biological quantum mechanism. ### Arguments Against (Stronger) However, compelling arguments weigh heavily against Orch OR serving as a valid bridge for the proposed convergence: - Orch OR’s Lack of Scientific Confirmation: As detailed in Section IV, Orch OR is a highly speculative theory facing major scientific challenges, most notably the decoherence problem.93 There is currently no consensus or strong empirical evidence supporting its core claims of functional quantum computation in microtubules or the specific Penrose OR mechanism.86 Building an argument for AI-QM convergence upon such a controversial and unproven foundation is scientifically unsound. - Irrelevance to Mainstream AI: The vast majority of progress and success in AI, particularly in neural networks and deep learning, has been achieved using classical computation on classical hardware.40 These systems do not involve quantum mechanics or microtubules. The “information states” represented and processed in classical NNs are fundamentally different (classical, deterministic given weights) from the quantum states proposed in Orch OR (quantum superposition, probabilistic collapse). Therefore, Orch OR, even if true, does not reflect the current nature or basis of mainstream AI. - Quantum AI Develops Independently: The fields of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) are motivated by the potential computational advantages of quantum mechanics (e.g., speedups via superposition and entanglement) and are developing independently of the Orch OR theory.20 These fields provide a direct, albeit still nascent, pathway for interaction and potential convergence between AI and QM principles, focused on computational power rather than biological consciousness mechanisms. The viability of QML/QNNs does not depend on whether Orch OR is correct. - Conflation of Consciousness and Intelligence: Orch OR is primarily a theory of consciousness—subjective experience or qualia.1 While related, consciousness is conceptually distinct from intelligence—the ability to learn, reason, and solve problems—which is the main focus of AI research.80 Even if Orch OR were proven to explain consciousness, it would not automatically explain the mechanisms of intelligence or necessitate a convergence in how AI models intelligence and QM models reality. Linking them assumes a tight coupling between quantum consciousness (via Orch OR) and general intelligence that is not established. The user’s specific argument—that Orch OR strengthens the AI-QM convergence—appears to suffer from a form of “hypothesis stacking.” It layers multiple speculative ideas: 1) the overarching convergence based on “information states,” 2) the validity of Orch OR itself, and 3) the claim that Orch OR provides the crucial link or exemplar for this convergence. The weakness or lack of evidence for any layer, particularly the highly contested Orch OR theory (layer 2), undermines the entire structure. If Orch OR is not scientifically supported, it cannot serve as the proposed bridge (layer 3), irrespective of any potential broader convergence (layer 1) driven by other factors like QML. Furthermore, the appeal of linking AI, QM, and consciousness via Orch OR might stem partly from a tendency to connect poorly understood or “mysterious” domains.11 Both consciousness (particularly the “hard problem” 117) and quantum mechanics possess counter-intuitive aspects that defy easy explanation. Adding the rapidly advancing, sometimes opaque capabilities of AI 5 creates a trio of complex fields. Orch OR offers a narrative connecting two of these (consciousness and QM).81 Extending this to bridge AI and QM might seem intellectually satisfying by offering a grand, unified picture. However, this appeal might be based more on shared complexity or “weirdness” than on robust scientific connections. The significant scientific challenges facing Orch OR suggest that this specific linkage is currently speculative and lacks empirical grounding. ## VIII. Synthesis: Evaluating the Coherence and Plausibility of the Metaheuristic The user proposed a metaheuristic involving a feedback loop: AI and QM “coevolve,” mutually informing each other based on a shared conceptualization of their subjects as “information states.” This convergence is potentially linked or exemplified by quantum processes in brain microtubules (via Orch OR theory) within a universe that is fundamentally information-theoretic. This section synthesizes the preceding analysis to evaluate the overall coherence and scientific plausibility of this proposed framework. ### Evaluating Coherence The coherence of the metaheuristic—the logical consistency and strength of the connections between its components—appears weak: - Weak Conceptual Links: The central concepts used to link the domains are problematic. The term “coevolution” is arguably an inappropriate metaphor for the development of fundamental scientific understanding in AI and QM, as the influence appears asymmetric (Insight II.2). The crucial notion of “information state” is ambiguous, representing fundamentally different kinds of information (classical vs. quantum) and different relationships to physical reality in AI versus QM (Insight II.1). The proposed bridge via Orch OR is extremely tenuous due to the theory’s highly controversial status and lack of empirical validation (Section IV, Section VII). The information-theoretic nature of the universe is itself a speculative framework (Insight V.2). - Internal Inconsistency / Questionable Assumptions: The logical structure of the feedback loop relies on multiple unproven or questionable assumptions. It assumes the validity of Orch OR, a specific (and debated) interpretation of information as fundamental to reality, and a strong, symmetric coevolution of core concepts between AI and QM. The reliance on Orch OR as the primary biological/cognitive link seems particularly misplaced, given that the development of QML and QNNs provides a more direct, computationally motivated (though still developing) interface between AI and QM principles, independent of consciousness or microtubules (Insight VII.1). ### Evaluating Plausibility The scientific plausibility of the metaheuristic—its alignment with established scientific knowledge and evidence—is low: - Lack of Scientific Grounding: Key components of the proposed loop lack robust empirical support. Orch OR remains highly speculative and faces significant scientific criticism, particularly regarding decoherence in the biological environment (Section IV, Insight IV.1). Information-theoretic universe models like Digital Physics or “It from Bit” are philosophical or theoretical hypotheses, not established physical theories (Insight V.2). While interactions between AI and QM are genuinely occurring (e.g., QML), these interactions primarily concern computational applications and methodological tools 20, not necessarily a deep convergence of fundamental concepts mediated by consciousness or specific biological structures as the metaheuristic suggests. - Availability of Simpler Explanations: The observed interplay between AI and QM can be more parsimoniously explained through pragmatic drivers. Quantum computing offers potential advantages for computationally intensive AI tasks, motivating QML research.20 Conversely, AI provides powerful tools for analyzing complex data and optimizing processes in quantum research and technology development.20 This direct, computationally driven interaction does not require invoking the additional layers of speculation involved in the user’s metaheuristic, such as Orch OR or specific information-centric cosmologies. Occam’s Razor would favor focusing on these more grounded interactions. The proposed metaheuristic attempts to weave together threads from the frontiers of physics, computer science, neuroscience, and philosophy. While such interdisciplinary synthesis can be intellectually stimulating and potentially fruitful for generating new hypotheses, this particular framework appears to overreach based on current scientific understanding. It connects multiple highly speculative areas—Orch OR, information-theoretic cosmology, and a strong interpretation of AI-QM conceptual coevolution—without sufficient empirical validation for its core components and linkages. It constructs a speculative edifice upon other speculations, resulting in a framework whose overall plausibility is significantly diminished by the weaknesses of its constituent parts, particularly the reliance on the scientifically contested Orch OR theory. The simpler, more direct interactions observed in the development of QML/QAI offer a more grounded, albeit less philosophically sweeping, account of the current relationship between AI and quantum mechanics. ## IX. Conclusion This report has critically evaluated the user’s hypothesis regarding a coevolutionary convergence between AI (neural networks) and Quantum Mechanics (QM), driven by an increasing focus on “information states” and potentially bridged by the Orch OR theory of consciousness operating within an information-theoretic universe. The analysis reveals significant challenges to the coherence and plausibility of this proposed metaheuristic: 1. Coevolution and Information States: The term “coevolution” appears to be an imprecise metaphor for the relationship between the fundamental scientific understanding in AI and QM, where influences seem asymmetric. The concept of an “information state” is used ambiguously, conflating the classical, deterministic information processed by current AI with the probabilistic, non-classical quantum information described by QM. 2. Orch OR Theory: The Penrose-Hameroff Orch OR theory, proposed as a central bridge, remains highly speculative and faces substantial scientific criticism. The primary obstacle is the lack of evidence for sustained quantum coherence in the brain’s warm, wet environment (the decoherence problem). Furthermore, its biological plausibility, explanatory necessity, and empirical support are heavily contested. 3. Information-Theoretic Universe: Frameworks like Digital Physics, the Holographic Principle, and “It from Bit,” while conceptually intriguing, are largely theoretical or philosophical hypotheses lacking direct empirical validation and facing their own conceptual challenges. 4. AI-QM Parallels: While mathematical analogies exist between neural network structures and QFT, and quantum concepts are inspiring new AI approaches (QNNs), fundamental differences remain in information encoding (implicit/real vs. probabilistic/complex), processing (non-linear vs. linear evolution), and the role of measurement. 5. The Microtubule Bridge: Relying on the unproven Orch OR theory to link AI-QM convergence via biological quantum consciousness is scientifically unsound. This connection stacks multiple layers of speculation and potentially commits a “quantum mystique” fallacy by linking poorly understood domains without sufficient mechanistic evidence. In conclusion, the proposed metaheuristic, while weaving together fascinating ideas from diverse fields, lacks scientific coherence and empirical plausibility in its current form. The conceptual links are often based on semantic ambiguity or questionable analogies, and key components like Orch OR and information-theoretic cosmology are highly speculative. The framework over-relies on controversial theories and overlooks simpler, more pragmatically grounded explanations for the observed interactions between AI and QM. Future research directions should focus on the rigorous investigation of the established and growing intersections between AI and QM, primarily within the fields of Quantum Machine Learning and Quantum Artificial Intelligence.20 Exploring how quantum computation can enhance AI, how AI can aid quantum science, and developing robust QNN architectures are promising avenues. Further research into quantum effects in biological systems is warranted, but must adhere to strict scientific standards and address challenges like decoherence convincingly. Similarly, progress in fundamental physics might eventually clarify the role of information in cosmology and quantum gravity. However, based on current evidence, the specific feedback loop involving coevolution, information states, Orch OR, and an information-theoretic universe, as proposed, is not supported. A clear distinction between established science, testable theoretical proposals, and speculative synthesis remains crucial for navigating these complex interdisciplinary frontiers. ### Works Cited 1. Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model of consciousness, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/classes/b629-sabr/QuantumComputationInBrainMicrotubules.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/classes/b629-sabr/QuantumComputationInBrainMicrotubules.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407457887%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3S8G2GEC587jLOK8wuB6is&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603239&usg=AOvVaw2DyGyktIepVtKWTr_sAN2K) 2. The finer scale of consciousness: quantum theory - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6861790/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6861790/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407458895%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3gakUihcXE0ZcW97-vyMNC&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603475&usg=AOvVaw2ZLf_ctHqHFyqouPnaKATn) 3. (PDF) The Universe as AI: A Self-Computing Topos and the..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389279059_The_Universe_as_AI_A_Self-Computing_Topos_and_the_Evolution_of_Cosmic_Intelligence](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/389279059_The_Universe_as_AI_A_Self-Computing_Topos_and_the_Evolution_of_Cosmic_Intelligence%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407460474%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0dIhnZUnRgNUUblrOruMrG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603531&usg=AOvVaw2J1ESBT-A0WDqIiqVA1m5s) 4. Beyond Conventional Boundaries: Reconsidering Consciousness, Cosmos, and Complexity Through Speculative Interdisciplinary Lenses - Steven Milanese, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://stevenmilanese.com/beyond-conventional-boundaries-reconsidering-consciousness-cosmos-and-complexity-through-speculative-interdisciplinary-lenses/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://stevenmilanese.com/beyond-conventional-boundaries-reconsidering-consciousness-cosmos-and-complexity-through-speculative-interdisciplinary-lenses/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407462189%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3a7xkESuuBI49k1_drfURd&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603640&usg=AOvVaw36S8lJ0S4hKXRi4PRcAfz_) 5. (PDF) Human-AI coevolution - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385800066_Human-AI_Coevolution](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/385800066_Human-AI_Coevolution%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407463116%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3GFZSNLTUv0I7Kc7tzyftX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603692&usg=AOvVaw2V9nP03qZqwjpSgYE0kJsK) 6. The Coevolution - Ptolemy Project, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/~eal/books/TheCoevolution.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/~eal/books/TheCoevolution.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407463966%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0J7RsiVlKGYuGDMyd-oAHD&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603735&usg=AOvVaw0wOf1jsOuqanGrpSMa6tAW) 7. Realizing More from Less: Co-evolution of Supply and Demand in the Technologically Transformative Era - CIGRE, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.cigre.org/article/GB/realizing-more-from-less-co-evolution-of-supply-and-demand-in-the-technologically-transformative-era](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.cigre.org/article/GB/realizing-more-from-less-co-evolution-of-supply-and-demand-in-the-technologically-transformative-era%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407465283%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1rBy5i1BeSMxQ4aJ8pbgd9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603784&usg=AOvVaw16ZmQwCya7W_iaEwms005Z) 8. AI Is Killing Choice and Chance–Which Means Changing What It Means to Be Human, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.nextgov.com/ideas/2021/03/ai-killing-choice-and-chance-which-means-changing-what-it-means-be-human/172299/?oref=ng-next-story](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.nextgov.com/ideas/2021/03/ai-killing-choice-and-chance-which-means-changing-what-it-means-be-human/172299/?oref%253Dng-next-story%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407466453%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2_CcDo0j9hywwb0GHUotRr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603836&usg=AOvVaw3qVUgXqoqao5g7jb92D3iv) 9. Top Research Papers on Quantum Mechanics - Paperguide, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://paperguide.ai/papers/top/research-papers-quantum-mechanics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://paperguide.ai/papers/top/research-papers-quantum-mechanics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407467311%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1AJ4_rf22icVOAsVO5-jX4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603885&usg=AOvVaw0mYjIpbqfPKV8PPysnMicC) 10. Unveiling the Fifth Dimension: A Novel Approach to Quantum Mechanics - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/7/1/8](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/7/1/8%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407468048%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1jV6Rgrtd_fiaVz2Pk0LIn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603928&usg=AOvVaw3Mfo76EPUZd4rDtdIU_33r) 11. Why I Believe Consciousness and Quantum Physics Are Deeply Interconnected - Reddit, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/1gfl7rv/why_i_believe_consciousness_and_quantum_physics/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/1gfl7rv/why_i_believe_consciousness_and_quantum_physics/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407468990%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2DSAsmlSY0T0ias4iOnCM0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407603983&usg=AOvVaw2TrPeFec92iswLDDOfBQxq) 12. Quantum Machine Learning: A Review and Current Status - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345190379_Quantum_Machine_Learning_A_Review_and_Current_Status](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/345190379_Quantum_Machine_Learning_A_Review_and_Current_Status%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407469988%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3x3IsFubYGtCDu0mfdVdgp&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604031&usg=AOvVaw3aOR7yuelEYclXIAQO1JU5) 13. Understanding Quantum Mechanics #2: Superposition and Entanglement, accessed April 9, 2025, [http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/05/understanding-quantum-mechanics-2.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/05/understanding-quantum-mechanics-2.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407470833%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qlDljixIy9X-GJff79NgT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604077&usg=AOvVaw3PvED_LWTdvoxhLfyZQ70V) 14. Exploring the key concepts of quantum mechanics - Innovation News Network, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/exploring-the-key-concepts-of-quantum-mechanics/51254/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/exploring-the-key-concepts-of-quantum-mechanics/51254/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407471813%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2NF9QWTVJy6RoTsIsMYDEK&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604127&usg=AOvVaw1VJY2eoE6D627rh__LN1HN) 15. Quantum mechanics - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407472440%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1irj2YZXvSqGIKa6tZKToN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604170&usg=AOvVaw2zrFitfLO77pVwWys7AQi4) 16. Quantum Mechanics: Unveiling the Mysteries of the Microscopic Universe, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://openmedscience.com/quantum-mechanics-unveiling-the-mysteries-of-the-microscopic-universe/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://openmedscience.com/quantum-mechanics-unveiling-the-mysteries-of-the-microscopic-universe/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407473418%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0U86FH1KT8Qfn9jSXi2v9V&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604213&usg=AOvVaw3wzyj0NmzojqVxkr4IH3G9) 17. Quantum Mechanics and Inclusive Materialism - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/5/140](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/5/140%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407474276%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0f_qYHjzxsWqjvnusmlnes&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604258&usg=AOvVaw0rDmgoJeNl5iPtf8m_J0Wa) 18. 1 Introduction - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.07681v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.07681v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407474902%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Eh6-aBRkHvmSsyTZbGTR5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604299&usg=AOvVaw2DiYXqLh979slAiVeoWSyJ) 19. Quantum-like Data Modeling in Applied Sciences: Review - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/1/21](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/1/21%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407475539%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0JWQJ_jbZpAkF6s1UIU8LL&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604341&usg=AOvVaw00kBZjVzSPXMN9kqbidew_) 20. arxiv.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10726](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10726%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407476121%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lsg0vtRon_un1dYPs8Z4N&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604382&usg=AOvVaw0_zsPmArSYCIynTVLqEFzg) 21. Quantum Machine Learning: An Interplay Between Quantum Computing and Machine LearningThe views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Wells Fargo. This article is for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this article should be construed as investment advice. Wells Fargo makes no express or implied warranties and disclaims all - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2411.09403v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2411.09403v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407477255%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Fij1f816bqkjxWZL-ZQVJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604435&usg=AOvVaw0wcA8NQDH__0MeXH7UtVre) 22. How To Use Neural Networks To Investigate Quantum Many-Body Physics, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040201](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040201%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407478044%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2AF6pHT4wSUSLqAXkiyD-O&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604476&usg=AOvVaw2skCXH-4ZCDFEzSMXn0sPm) 23. Machine learning meets quantum foundations: A brief survey | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342848804_Machine_learning_meets_quantum_foundations_A_brief_survey](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/342848804_Machine_learning_meets_quantum_foundations_A_brief_survey%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407478935%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1aEdSSybZxIZjSXfxMFAGi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604521&usg=AOvVaw31AoyTg38gvIfTCnSN4tA4) 24. Full article: Quantum machine learning: from physics to software engineering, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23746149.2023.2165452](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23746149.2023.2165452%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407479747%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1yoPjRNsH9NMHorXl1ozyx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604569&usg=AOvVaw1_9dkGQcA0CXDjyMcCLw6G) 25. A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerance, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2401.11351v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2401.11351v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407480610%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3w_UFAAG-v_I2IIAYtH7or&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604620&usg=AOvVaw3BJrcORlnRhOuAvH8pcExo) 26. A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerance - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.11351](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.11351%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407481242%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3xlIYsxexUtwER1chXKpJ0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604661&usg=AOvVaw0FqOIhZvcAbZaEUiwtnGfN) 27. Machine Learning Applications of Quantum Computing: A Review - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13262](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13262%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407481996%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lshyjoFNGZWNqrqg4gWbv&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604701&usg=AOvVaw1VwVDAYcZluHJNVQWzL28r) 28. Quantum neural network - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_neural_network](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_neural_network%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407482566%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2yLM24NACEKB4EDgOj-82f&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604740&usg=AOvVaw0CNSqxmsBXA4AT-5bJlE1q) 29. Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/5/2/48](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/5/2/48%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407483492%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2jeaw6gmQ4mMb0FxPuGoRo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604787&usg=AOvVaw1mDQjyVtulKlPvpCTxq31p) 30. Quantum machine learning: from physics to software engineering, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://mx.nthu.edu.tw/~rklee/files/APX-Review-ML-23.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://mx.nthu.edu.tw/~rklee/files/APX-Review-ML-23.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407484133%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3n40oRgj7zYiPdMVnxA1zM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604829&usg=AOvVaw3RtsREawH49URGVsFGFKsy) 31. arXiv:1709.02779v1 [quant-ph] 8 Sep 2017, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02779](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02779%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407484789%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw24AhyG-HfcI7ddfoSIXE-i&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604869&usg=AOvVaw0nWyM8mzDiCRcaQb-nDOy9) 32. Quantum Neural Networks: A Comparative Analysis and Noise Robustness Evaluation, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2501.14412v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2501.14412v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407485319%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ZFTWqu5pf1CX_QzWeQwfS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604910&usg=AOvVaw1_C6XlPEtYHSxbsWrB7rRc) 33. Natural Quantization of Neural Networks - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.15482v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.15482v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407485736%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2aJQUfqwhioC8OO_e5QmEx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604949&usg=AOvVaw0xys5G9E6oundHxYtPB6Mr) 34. Quantitative Evaluation of Quantum/Classical Neural Network Using a Game Solver Metric, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2503.21514v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2503.21514v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407486440%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3c-2GYJSIJQrB5ZHYKpUZR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407604990&usg=AOvVaw0_JKxosbMlBYFZEL1SxZtQ) 35. Quantum data parallelism in quantum neural networks | Phys. Rev. Research, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013177](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013177%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407486920%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw188Gpxpve6bdBCuiqOKCZx&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605032&usg=AOvVaw0FuYJyfRyNaRbFMhQ7j5Vk) 36. From Graphs to Qubits: A Critical Review of Quantum Graph Neural Networks - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2408.06524v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2408.06524v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407487270%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2DeViKgLPkw_2U-2Njlzby&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605074&usg=AOvVaw0OInrQ6wQKeeaoXlpHTaSv) 37. A review of Quantum Neural Networks: Methods, Models, Dilemma - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.01840](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.01840%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407487690%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw29UgiHy5bK-_u4hT3Rz9jY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605117&usg=AOvVaw3JldxorGobRe6Hn9Xt7uaD) 38. Reduction of finite sampling noise in quantum neural networks, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2024-06-25-1385/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2024-06-25-1385/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407488177%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1ho6zpSn9HZvc362tG7uj7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605158&usg=AOvVaw1VnAKkXdbh1GGri3N0Lpdn) 39. Quantum Methods for Neural Networks and Application to Medical Image Classification, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2022-12-22-881/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2022-12-22-881/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407488686%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2-m20gk_Ba4DzL-6ZYoL4W&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605201&usg=AOvVaw0i2gjxGDyPDXfKIMPUrJ7g) 40. AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems - PMC, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830986/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830986/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407489289%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0IUJ2JPVvAIBaAXmtbD2AQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605245&usg=AOvVaw3RF9d6hQC4zsUaNqGgvhrC) 41. Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633405/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633405/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407490109%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3tpSqc-xg_BucBIoi1UOaV&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605288&usg=AOvVaw0F4GoJ_ZHVptewaiNnUKmE) 42. What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? - Palo Alto Networks, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/artificial-intelligence-ai](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/artificial-intelligence-ai%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407490777%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2qZaBhlKE9yn5KA3OblgmZ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605330&usg=AOvVaw3yDJ57s639LTvCioO2-til) 43. History, motivations and core themes of AI - University of Memphis..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=ccrg_papers](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D1029%2526context%253Dccrg_papers%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407491428%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw14kgf1NY-xbQwUxb6E5PT0&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605381&usg=AOvVaw0poJwSThml0NV6JbThCUcU) 44. AI for Beginners - The Difference Between Symbolic & Connectionist AI - RE•WORK Blog, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://blog.re-work.co/the-difference-between-symbolic-ai-and-connectionist-ai/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://blog.re-work.co/the-difference-between-symbolic-ai-and-connectionist-ai/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407492106%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2qpszAOJAMZNyZ9gnWQ23a&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605441&usg=AOvVaw1NrmOeqP_9TgdY1pdZy_0B) 45. Symbolic AI vs. Connectionist AI: Know the Difference - SmythOS, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-tutorials/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-tutorials/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407492741%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3gRfOlADxEPqQSvDkzHWFW&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605487&usg=AOvVaw1VsSjFfalXMjfaXyWZ1gvs) 46. ojs.aaai.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/download/15111/18883](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/download/15111/18883%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407493371%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw18YtRn8jhr0THjNmvcMrcH&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605530&usg=AOvVaw0d9Jf7NceeGQ96RG3EBflA) 47. Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2407.08516v2](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2407.08516v2%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407493954%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0e7dJqejjg4EEMXmVQybJQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605575&usg=AOvVaw3ql-o0DYCG6FkvSqkpzZi2) 48. Symbolic AI vs. Connectionist AI: Unveiling the Fundamental Differences - Medium, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://medium.com/@interprobeit/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai-unveiling-the-fundamental-differences-ecef3bf8063f](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://medium.com/@interprobeit/symbolic-ai-vs-connectionist-ai-unveiling-the-fundamental-differences-ecef3bf8063f%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407494784%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0brOncwNPkcDfXTUcqctKi&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605619&usg=AOvVaw3XjQGRPBmqnWgxGQ1k_i3n) 49. Connectionism - Lark, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.larksuite.com/en_us/topics/ai-glossary/connectionism](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.larksuite.com/en_us/topics/ai-glossary/connectionism%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407495293%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0TAdRKnmH81DG8TShSlhZY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605665&usg=AOvVaw1GxoCsiK3GxZ6syornKgR4) 50. Blog Archive » Why Quantum Mechanics? - Shtetl-Optimized, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=6244](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://scottaaronson.blog/?p%253D6244%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407495813%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1Q9ZnI3HbYMGQr_yDaYNBw&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605707&usg=AOvVaw3R9ORz9mlfto5bDWlVoGFf) 51. Quantum Deep Learning and Renormalization, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.math.chalmers.se/~stig/project4.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.math.chalmers.se/~stig/project4.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407496390%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0dYpRWBbBVdcTDCMeFbRWa&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605749&usg=AOvVaw2fR_EuNglgceEO8Sd4SqpQ) 52. Deep neural networks in the quantum vacuum | by Giulio Prisco - Turing Church, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://turingchurch.net/deep-neural-networks-in-the-quantum-vacuum-e66794f37b02](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://turingchurch.net/deep-neural-networks-in-the-quantum-vacuum-e66794f37b02%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407497045%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Y_4j7a3SpZbDtzNNFiGEX&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605794&usg=AOvVaw2pKsH1Y2HRbC9VsxFgJQqe) 53. [2201.01233] Discrete and continuous representations and processing in deep learning: Looking forward - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01233](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01233%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407497736%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3MSSZNlV2CCqEXcCAf4gYM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605842&usg=AOvVaw3uxi3TSj5a1rRajZ-52nIX) 54. Neural Networks: Binary vs. Discrete vs. Continuous Inputs - Baeldung, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.baeldung.com/cs/binary-vs-discrete-vs-continuous-inputs](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.baeldung.com/cs/binary-vs-discrete-vs-continuous-inputs%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407498171%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw07SATyJ6JKfZQxK76N-Dtn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605883&usg=AOvVaw3210_4fMen2iyrUs457RaS) 55. Deep Learning in Robotics: A Review of Recent Research Harry A. Pierson (corresponding author) - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07217](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07217%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407498552%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0k4hInnlhSfsH8dTusHzNn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605927&usg=AOvVaw2tOWrpDscOrTlXr0BVkayU) 56. Understanding Robotic Control Systems - AZoRobotics, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=188](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID%253D188%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407498999%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw19OTu85p5xb_tMIgNNjtR1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407605969&usg=AOvVaw0-Cn2ChZ8g8I2Hft_B1r_O) 57. Continuous Knowledge Graphs for Neurosymbolic AI | by Mike..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://medium.com/@mike.dillinger/continuous-knowledge-graphs-for-neurosymbolic-ai-9000b4aa0eb7](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://medium.com/@mike.dillinger/continuous-knowledge-graphs-for-neurosymbolic-ai-9000b4aa0eb7%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407499505%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0ka11ENtPRflexxfAhME9M&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606019&usg=AOvVaw1G8MTUPwILiq8KEj4qeBUj) 58. Discrete vs. Continuous Data: What Is The Difference? | Whatagraph, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://whatagraph.com/blog/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://whatagraph.com/blog/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407500030%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2tfnac48ZqKFyiBWfViXxJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606066&usg=AOvVaw3_A9ug8KT4BFIEJDvZQRgO) 59. Discrete vs. Continuous Data: A Guide for Beginners - Coursera, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.coursera.org/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.coursera.org/articles/discrete-vs-continuous-data%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407500663%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3Xci6nyKNKg6ElZ1syDWSL&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606111&usg=AOvVaw1KMzGyv5YQxRDz-bz4lDIQ) 60. Seven Key Dimensions to Help You Understand Artificial Intelligence Environments, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.kdnuggets.com/2019/07/seven-key-dimensions-understand-artificial-intelligence-environments.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.kdnuggets.com/2019/07/seven-key-dimensions-understand-artificial-intelligence-environments.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407501411%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw30qRWtTj0OCsPbh5ZOmQQM&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606169&usg=AOvVaw2oDgrCc2Aw_VBiRxVfXw5Z) 61. The Basics of Quantum Mechanics - THE QUANTUM LÄND, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://thequantumlaend.de/basic-tutorial/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://thequantumlaend.de/basic-tutorial/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407501923%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qTnUVdLYC4NicOHwUrugy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606242&usg=AOvVaw2l6sYLicWVbLj9sYCh74Kc) 62. A Unified Theory of Binary Reality: Quantum Foundations of Dual-Plane Existence, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.devstrike.net/topic/6369-a-unified-theory-of-binary-reality-quantum-foundations-of-dual-plane-existence/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.devstrike.net/topic/6369-a-unified-theory-of-binary-reality-quantum-foundations-of-dual-plane-existence/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407502616%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0clFuSP8qKff6XBbIOV0-y&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606299&usg=AOvVaw2ilwQNbTxtBoZrugeFSShF) 63. Quantum Realities: A Comparative Analysis of Interpretations Addressing the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics - The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2201&context=student_scholarship](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%253D2201%2526context%253Dstudent_scholarship%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407503228%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3l4rAK6mCPCZ6XlV29_QWt&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606355&usg=AOvVaw3LOOOq19kq6XnV4o179x0g) 64. Interpretations of quantum mechanics - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407503920%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw17U6Xf3YwVWFGuPjULjoAl&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606408&usg=AOvVaw2FVcxcm3A0aoboP7pYI7kt) 65. Information Theory - Neoclassical, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://neoclassical.ai/2024/07/14/information-theory/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://neoclassical.ai/2024/07/14/information-theory/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407504466%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0rjqetVk3-sQJuYuoL2Blu&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606451&usg=AOvVaw2XWSdp7zJp-l6L3RQrNi_2) 66. Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford Philosophical Monographs) - Amazon.com, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.amazon.com/Information-Foundations-Mechanics-Philosophical-Monographs/dp/0199296464](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.amazon.com/Information-Foundations-Mechanics-Philosophical-Monographs/dp/0199296464%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407505063%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0b5I1ch8UsAud73nF0jTCE&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606496&usg=AOvVaw0LXacz828NJTyoMjMUcHAK) 67. A connection between quantum theory and information theory | ScienceDaily, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/12/241206161913.htm](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/12/241206161913.htm%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407505783%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3fjxKe2PK2YW20tdlB-u3R&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606546&usg=AOvVaw2SoCoVyuWpaxCz1IFBbNRC) 68. philsci-archive.pitt.edu, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2344/1/qinfandfoundsqm.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2344/1/qinfandfoundsqm.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407506369%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3TRqbc-Pmcyz86IsFAjIDS&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606588&usg=AOvVaw0P5OH4Pp3NXWdtCxdK5hq6) 69. Quantum Information Theory - Max Planck Quantum Alliance, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://max-planck-quantum-alliance.mpg.de/quantum-information-theory/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://max-planck-quantum-alliance.mpg.de/quantum-information-theory/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407506883%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2Eg5Vtc0xa1wRAu8UuYET_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606630&usg=AOvVaw2o20XhH6SyrLPnXJkK6SO3) 70. Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics | Oxford Academic, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://academic.oup.com/book/33070](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://academic.oup.com/book/33070%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407507455%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1AFGpNptnk60wMiCTTVYHJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606674&usg=AOvVaw0Nd9cHiaY_SCjnPFz18cd8) 71. Fundamentals of quantum information theory - UCI Mathematics, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.math.uci.edu/~brusso/keylphysrep.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.math.uci.edu/~brusso/keylphysrep.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407507953%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3W4ZUidOFzlYojeypNtSsy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606715&usg=AOvVaw2LCb4_mXERPCWYqygLr3o0) 72. Information Theory and Quantum Physics: Physical Foundations for Understanding the Conscious Process (Theoretical and Mathematical Physics) - Amazon.com, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.amazon.com/Information-Theory-Quantum-Physics-Understanding/dp/354066517X](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.amazon.com/Information-Theory-Quantum-Physics-Understanding/dp/354066517X%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407508916%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw02Z3DLlWMzQzClvzRsQbv5&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606761&usg=AOvVaw2vlSfht2rVCxMrb5y-ta_9) 73. Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford Philosophical Monographs) [1 ed.] 9780199296460, 0199296464 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://dokumen.pub/quantum-information-theory-and-the-foundations-of-quantum-mechanics-oxford-philosophical-monographs-1nbsped-9780199296460-0199296464.html](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://dokumen.pub/quantum-information-theory-and-the-foundations-of-quantum-mechanics-oxford-philosophical-monographs-1nbsped-9780199296460-0199296464.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407509716%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ZOxuoLrHW-qeR7y3BBJYp&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606811&usg=AOvVaw2UDYJ6wuieMIf4XRVy4fc6) 74. Quantum Information Theory and The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0412063](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0412063%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407510277%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2cfBYQitCTIwazPMTps5CJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606861&usg=AOvVaw3AdiQxaQEPmowomP3TxB2I) 75. Quantum Mechanics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed April 9, 2025, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407510829%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0V8_wpAbk1nCxFCxN3LjY4&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606902&usg=AOvVaw0SpNfHaNvUmTN3R1fICZ5f) 76. Quantum Mechanics as a Constructive Theory - MDPI, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/161](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/9/6/161%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407511299%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3G3uqL6bpU5CIyrIvZK06N&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606941&usg=AOvVaw0U3P_xD10zIW_jB__gqCyM) 77. (PDF) Bridging the Gap: Towards a Physics of Information and AI’s..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376613489_Bridging_the_Gap_Towards_a_Physics_of_Information_and_AI's_Emergent_Phenomena](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/376613489_Bridging_the_Gap_Towards_a_Physics_of_Information_and_AI%26%2339;s_Emergent_Phenomena%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407512210%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0QRi_A6OvbQKyrwPvSjLlG&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407606985&usg=AOvVaw0pqkTAKoLl-6STeYTtRGRf) 78. Philosophy and the Mirror of Technology: Quantum AI Invigorates..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://blog.apaonline.org/2021/08/12/philosophy-and-the-mirror-of-technology-quantum-ai-invigorates-spinoza/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://blog.apaonline.org/2021/08/12/philosophy-and-the-mirror-of-technology-quantum-ai-invigorates-spinoza/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407512906%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1AH2CtkpA9f_vq8bKBkeAm&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607035&usg=AOvVaw3obhL3cA378WwSFnUdZm1D) 79. Does a Mind Need a Body? - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177348/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177348/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407513533%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0hLia8vMlwyYADYw9naLcJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607081&usg=AOvVaw1-O4_EZ84gF5kVJoCxE_F_) 80. Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism - OSF, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://osf.io/tz6an_v1/download](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://osf.io/tz6an_v1/download%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407514069%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3kGxMQ7rBxpeBqOTGZ15xg&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607141&usg=AOvVaw3g6RECo8QYqY8-8WAMfswX) 81. Orch OR | Stuart Hameroff, MD, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://hameroff.arizona.edu/research-overview/orch-or](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://hameroff.arizona.edu/research-overview/orch-or%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407514635%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw31dWT85ImwVQbXxVdwX8WU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607181&usg=AOvVaw0l_sryeAyHJAitMYZGTELo) 82. 14 CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE UNIVERSE AN UPDATED REVIEW OF THE “ORCH OR” THEORY - Anesthesiology, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://anesth.medicine.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/hameroff-penrose_updated_review_of_orch_or_2016_b2237_ch-14_revised-2-3.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://anesth.medicine.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/hameroff-penrose_updated_review_of_orch_or_2016_b2237_ch-14_revised-2-3.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407515394%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3qzo0s-GOgrXBIudXZWfw8&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607227&usg=AOvVaw1l0Y-xJQE5OA1PhQFi52g1) 83. Microtubules: The Gateway To Consciousness | Stuart Hameroff - YouTube, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_bQwdJir1o](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v%253D0_bQwdJir1o%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407516007%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2pgo0Z7tw0lAO8mTyfGQUe&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607287&usg=AOvVaw08SGJKQNvDDK0Wpl3BVust) 84. Clarifying the Tubulin bit/qubit - Defending the Penrose-Hameroff Orch OR Model (Quantum Biology) - YouTube, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXFFbxoHp3s](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v%253DLXFFbxoHp3s%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407516619%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3ICCwxB3Gy_0vZcdovj0pb&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607331&usg=AOvVaw1u0EpQReuqomGXHW1TtDPc) 85. Discovery of quantum vibrations in ‘microtubules’ inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness | ScienceDaily, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140116085105.htm](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140116085105.htm%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407517454%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2AIeOiITozKubtY6LAgD4v&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607380&usg=AOvVaw177a4jn8UFHxai-4LhKNFr) 86. Consensus on Orch OR (Penrose-Hameroff) theory of consciousness?: r/neuro - Reddit, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/neuro/comments/1ddyn2u/consensus_on_orch_or_penrosehameroff_theory_of/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/neuro/comments/1ddyn2u/consensus_on_orch_or_penrosehameroff_theory_of/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407518183%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1hGaxN8IJ5nN5S-tmQPfd9&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607425&usg=AOvVaw0D7YHg2FI2073Z_R1uLTno) 87. hameroff.arizona.edu, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://hameroff.arizona.edu/research-overview/orch-or#:~:text=In%20the%20mid%201990s%20we,collapse'%20and%20resonate%20across%20scale%2C](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://hameroff.arizona.edu/research-overview/orch-or%2523:~:text%253DIn%252520the%252520mid%2525201990s%252520we,collapse%26%2339;%252520and%252520resonate%252520across%252520scale%25252C%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407518970%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3fMw9I6HrUDbKB9FTGCf78&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607473&usg=AOvVaw0jopQRYWEeL9f38JWz6lP2) 88. Think tank ‘smears’ Orch OR quantum theory of consciousness | Newswise, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.newswise.com/articles/think-tank-smears-orch-or-quantum-theory-of-consciousness](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.newswise.com/articles/think-tank-smears-orch-or-quantum-theory-of-consciousness%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407519755%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw30WYguSBjAkvbfbW80gcAn&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607526&usg=AOvVaw0XfuaCxBF64Lam1zngMKoX) 89. Consciousness in the universe: a review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24070914/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24070914/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407520240%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1YOLOZBh1Rzok_Y4gawP9O&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607570&usg=AOvVaw0KGGLky70bu4jHpE72hoQU) 90. The ORCH OR Theory of Consciousness and its Critics with Stuart Hameroff - YouTube, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz4etUyiAVo](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v%253Dlz4etUyiAVo%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407520704%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0-cHt8S_wzasCJhaLfOqMT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607612&usg=AOvVaw0yN5MlARNgvDjRm37XV606) 91. Quantum Consciousness: A Critique of the Current Framework - Medium, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://medium.com/quantum-mysteries/quantum-consciousness-a-critique-of-the-current-framework-1f59d3c53449](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://medium.com/quantum-mysteries/quantum-consciousness-a-critique-of-the-current-framework-1f59d3c53449%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407521451%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1_13vhKZO_sOppXTxuTVaA&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607655&usg=AOvVaw3-jeUnIbD5nxdz1N_Dr-tN) 92. osf.io, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://osf.io/5v7dp/download](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://osf.io/5v7dp/download%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407521904%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2jMSj619xgcWr0M0HHMftY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607698&usg=AOvVaw215tPdWWC2pUEdmAZ1PCoT) 93. Orchestrated objective reduction - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407522477%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1VXRNQUBrOtcGYMEFnitXJ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607738&usg=AOvVaw2kN2wW1T_X0mOdPWV83Cvf) 94. TOWARD A COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF EVERYTHING - Wireilla, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://wireilla.com/physics/ijrap/papers/9320ijrap02.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://wireilla.com/physics/ijrap/papers/9320ijrap02.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407523089%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2t2Enxqp9tlctzUrBiK5_1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607783&usg=AOvVaw1gY18ElrSSNfrqISBI9I5i) 95. arXiv:1206.0376v1 [cs.IT] 2 Jun 2012 Introducing the Computable Universe, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.0376](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.0376%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407523997%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3yOWTr7hoZYdwpBT3NfUTU&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607825&usg=AOvVaw0x1ytJjSYeTdHNWZEZX9id) 96. The Holographic Principle - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2052783_The_Holographic_Principle](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/2052783_The_Holographic_Principle%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407524546%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1xjvZtStA-ToxfKBlvygdI&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607865&usg=AOvVaw3GVFJKkKDBV4Rsi9QeBbzQ) 97. Holofractal: ELI5: r/holofractal - Reddit, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/holofractal/comments/d382s3/holofractal_eli5/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.reddit.com/r/holofractal/comments/d382s3/holofractal_eli5/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407525143%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0_rnRZSjw2GIoLGrVyKIew&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607908&usg=AOvVaw3R72g1Uibn845JV-ISwavr) 98. The Simulation Hypothesis: Exploring a Radical New Law of Physics - Ultra Unlimited, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.ultra-unlimited.com/blog/simulation-hypothesis-vopson](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.ultra-unlimited.com/blog/simulation-hypothesis-vopson%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407525734%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3HxnNoSPjHxA0TV5d6O7Rk&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607953&usg=AOvVaw2WmaGxpeyYKOhYVoLutYok) 99. The Hyper-Torus Universe Model—A New Paradigm for Understanding Reality, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.0674/v5](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.0674/v5%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407526276%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0rujMaCaM0OrUa1WKyCVdO&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407607997&usg=AOvVaw365ymWolHSiGDz069hXc_1) 100. Hybrid Continuous-Discrete Variable Quantum Computing..., accessed April 9, 2025, [https://yuanliu.group/projects/hybrid-qip/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://yuanliu.group/projects/hybrid-qip/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407526840%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1kZ8AHw0eUFV_b3fr0Oyh2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608042&usg=AOvVaw37YeDEqMyogQiW7p0dEgFo) 101. bridging quantum mechanics and computing: a primer for software engineers - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16154](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16154%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407527309%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2cNzMVdrb4-Eh_ki7dPZqR&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608083&usg=AOvVaw349ipwr9MbORV9Zmvng4zV) 102. Quantum Computing Parallel Processing | Restackio, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.restack.io/p/gpu-computing-answer-quantum-parallel-processing-cat-ai](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.restack.io/p/gpu-computing-answer-quantum-parallel-processing-cat-ai%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407527759%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2NJ3iW6HZM9X3N2LFjOkMY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608128&usg=AOvVaw0wjwlsMeOPkN-3-Tk_D726) 103. Quantum Computation and Information Using Continuous Variables, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10842](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10842%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407528400%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3G_StxYROKQf-MyZS5STRr&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608184&usg=AOvVaw1Qu2wrtedNWThdhjM6K3wU) 104. Resources in quantum computation for discrete and continuous-variable systems - Chalmers Research, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://research.chalmers.se/publication/541176/file/541176_Fulltext.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://research.chalmers.se/publication/541176/file/541176_Fulltext.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407529173%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2K5cXyVKF110S6qngYXoYN&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608230&usg=AOvVaw2n2SRbfiqGkjM4aJWNZSsR) 105. Continuous-variable quantum information - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407529730%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2uv0q5Gv0zJ9QQjQTt3jst&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608274&usg=AOvVaw3U5ntJwu_TRoeGxDFoTeNB) 106. Quantum computation with continuous variables (Chapter 9) - Introduction to Optical Quantum Information Processing - Cambridge University Press & Assessment, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/introduction-to-optical-quantum-information-processing/quantum-computation-with-continuous-variables/BADAD26DA3B30F591BD03FB9F7466F01](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/introduction-to-optical-quantum-information-processing/quantum-computation-with-continuous-variables/BADAD26DA3B30F591BD03FB9F7466F01%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407530487%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0mSYOyOMTy9FfMbpnlJPOy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608325&usg=AOvVaw3C0iAMGXWW-06bZD_HAKzE) 107. en.wikipedia.org, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information#:~:text=In%20a%20sense%2C%20continuous%2Dvariable,of%20qubits%20are%20finite%2Ddimensional.](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information%2523:~:text%253DIn%252520a%252520sense%25252C%252520continuous%25252Dvariable,of%252520qubits%252520are%252520finite%25252Ddimensional.%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407530987%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0qR8_gDOcCGvMsWeyhVNZF&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608380&usg=AOvVaw1NT_o7GAbq81odXS_H9PSJ) 108. The Holographic Principle of Mind and the Evolution of Consciousness - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249036855_The_Holographic_Principle_of_Mind_and_the_Evolution_of_Consciousness](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/249036855_The_Holographic_Principle_of_Mind_and_the_Evolution_of_Consciousness%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407532120%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw25ZndEy9lbtCNgDlFsOHcy&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608436&usg=AOvVaw3wZDo7Si15bjAmnWE5wNhC) 109. Neural network representation of quantum systems - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2403.11420v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2403.11420v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407532595%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3AokmOxo-pAwMCE-0d5v0l&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608484&usg=AOvVaw2g-WLxQ5y2nn2XlCQpHiiF) 110. Quantum Neural Networks and Topological Quantum Field Theories - ArTS, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arts.units.it/bitstream/11368/3043038/5/Marciano_2022-Post_print.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arts.units.it/bitstream/11368/3043038/5/Marciano_2022-Post_print.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407533248%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0VdAnvE8XhJQAdhtaoDKg2&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608526&usg=AOvVaw0h83l-cyXVFWqWY7xCQoNG) 111. (PDF) Quantum Fields as Deep Learning - ResearchGate, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319272134_Quantum_Fields_as_Deep_Learning](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/319272134_Quantum_Fields_as_Deep_Learning%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407533747%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw34T8O4VctptHKGY42bGUtQ&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608572&usg=AOvVaw2j9rFGQXI2KSCtLeteS2nq) 112. The edge of chaos: quantum field theory and deep neural networks - SciPost, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://www.scipost.org/preprints/scipost_202110_00024/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.scipost.org/preprints/scipost_202110_00024/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407534289%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1nuzAtbFxfRWfDjM4W0ERY&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608617&usg=AOvVaw0A0R-IH3QADozSoo3rl2T6) 113. Neural Networks and Quantum Field Theory - GitHub Pages, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://cometscome.github.io/DLAP2020/slides/NN-QFT_DLAP.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://cometscome.github.io/DLAP2020/slides/NN-QFT_DLAP.pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407534939%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1veqMOScoxdNIURDQ11Y5T&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608660&usg=AOvVaw2lxdTlOiIxxlfiERXxmz3O) 114. The edge of chaos: Quantum field theory and deep neural networks - SciPost, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://scipost.org/SciPostPhys.12.3.081/pdf](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://scipost.org/SciPostPhys.12.3.081/pdf%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407535533%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw3TE_fdgnQ_khDLyB_WTQCo&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608704&usg=AOvVaw3spLWExKgzUMbrcAV8yPZw) 115. QIXAI: A Quantum-Inspired Framework for Enhancing Classical and Quantum Model Transparency and Understanding - arXiv, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://arxiv.org/html/2410.16537v1](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://arxiv.org/html/2410.16537v1%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407536309%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0lnrpxIzI1sRyM9bfYCM07&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608747&usg=AOvVaw22qlagDfmoi22Rwg-rM9_L) 116. Philosophy of artificial intelligence - Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407537016%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw2hPAn9j30YcphCTj4eY5B_&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608789&usg=AOvVaw12bf9DX8Jg72CKDl1KL7pH) 117. Hard Problem of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 9, 2025, [https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1744167407537605%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw0jlr8EHYqehJzQWFZX3Vqh&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744167407608832&usg=AOvVaw2c_23ee5jmfvyem8ffRwWa)