project_state: metadata: project_name: Foundational Information Dynamics project_code: FID project_type: Research & Development / Theoretical Physics primary_methodology: PBRF OMF v2.0 (Principle-Based Layered Approach) current_status: Executing # Paused for monitoring review schema_version_used: v4.0 last_modified_timestamp: 2025-05-10T18:55:00Z # Example actual timestamp exploration_history: # ... (content as in previous state) ... charter: # ... (content as in previous state) ... plan: version: '1.1' status: Formalized wbs: # ... (Tasks 0.0 through 2.4.2 status: Completed, actual_durations filled) ... - id: '2.4.2' description: 'Develop L2 Candidate Stream B: Geometric Algebra Model' parent_id: '2.4' dependencies: ['2.3'] definition_of_done: "Working prototype or detailed specification of the GA-based model. Key L0/L1 concepts mapped. Initial exploration of dynamic rules for emergence. Documented." is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Development', 'AI-Research'] estimated_duration: 'Multi-sprint' ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Specification for L2 Geometric Algebra Model for FID", output_filename_base: "FID_L2_GAModel_Spec_v1.0", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0", "FID_L1_Conceptual_Framework (all docs)", "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", "Infomatics (relevant geometric concepts from historical synthesis)"] } actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:50:00Z" - id: '2.4.3' description: 'Define Comparative Evaluation Criteria for L2 Candidates' parent_id: '2.4' dependencies: ['2.1', '2.3'] definition_of_done: "Documented list of weighted evaluation criteria approved by User." is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed # Updated assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis', 'User-Review'] estimated_duration: '1-2 sprints' ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Comparative Evaluation Criteria for FID L2 Candidates", source_material_references: ["FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_EvalCriteria_v1.0"} actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:55:00Z" # Example - id: '2.4.4' description: '(Milestone) Perform Comparative Evaluation & Recommendation for L2 Path Forward' parent_id: '2.4' dependencies: ['2.4.1', '2.4.2', '2.4.3'] definition_of_done: "Comparative evaluation report and recommendation for L2 path forward (down-select, hybrid, or continue parallel) generated and approved by User." is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started # Next task assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis', 'User-Decision'] estimated_duration: '1-2 sprints' ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "L2 Candidate Comparative Evaluation & Recommendation", source_material_references: ["FID_L2_GraphNetModel_Spec_v1.0", "FID_L2_GAModel_Spec_v1.0", "FID_L2_EvalCriteria_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_ComparativeEvalReport_v1.0"} # ... (rest of WBS as in previous state, including 2.5 and Phases 3,4,5) ... task_sequencing_notes: Work proceeds sequentially through Phases (0-5). Tasks within phases have specified dependencies. Validation milestones gate progress. Task 2.4 now involves comparative development with sub-tasks. resource_plan_notes: Primary resource is User-AI collaboration. Computational resources for L3 simulations. Access to historical PBRF/EQR/Infomatics detailed docs if L2/L3 builds directly on them. Code execution capabilities of AI now confirmed. quality_plan_notes: Adherence to PBRF OMF v2.0, FID KAs (StyleGuide, Glossary, SuccessMetrics). Layered validation against PBRF Success Criteria. PEAP for novel predictions. Rigorous self-critique (Meta-RefineOutput) by AI for key generated artifacts, including code. risk_register: # ... (content as in previous state) ... change_management_process: Significant changes to scope, goals, or methodology require explicit user approval and documentation update (e.g., Charter/Plan revision). Decisions made during sprints logged in `project_state.logs.decisions`. methodology_specific_planning: Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0, emphasizing layered development, principle-first derivation, explicit success criteria (PBRF Success Criteria), fail-fast/pivot cycles, and PEAP for novel predictions. internal_review_summary: "Plan (v1.1) reflects comparative L2 formalism development under Task 2.4. Tasks 2.4.1, 2.4.2, and 2.4.3 completed." # Updated flagged_critical_issues: [] execution: tasks: # ... (FID_exec_0.1_001 to FID_exec_2.4.1_001 as in previous state, all 'Completed') ... - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.4.2_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.4.2' status: Completed # ... (content as in previous state) ... actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:50:00Z" - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.4.3_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.4.3' status: Completed inputs_used: - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.plan.wbs - type: ai_skill_input reference: specialized_process_inputs from WBS task 2.4.3 - type: document_content reference: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0 content" proposed_approach: "Invoke DraftTextualContent skill to generate comparative evaluation criteria for L2 candidates, based on FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0." execution_log: "Invoked DraftTextualContent skill. Skill generated draft of FID_L2_EvalCriteria_v1.0. Internal Meta-RefineOutput applied by skill. Output presented to user and accepted." specialized_process_used: null ai_skill_invoked: "DraftTextualContent" output_data: type: "document_simple_text" content_reference: "FID_L2_EvalCriteria_v1.0" content_inline: | # Full content of FID_L2_EvalCriteria_v1.0 would be here # Foundational Information Dynamics (FID) - L2 Comparative Evaluation Criteria v1.0 ## 1. Introduction ... # ... (rest of the document) format: "markdown" internal_critique_summary: "DraftTextualContent skill executed with internal Meta-RefineOutput. Output (L2 evaluation criteria) reviewed against task DoD; appears comprehensive and aligned with L2 Requirements." quality_check_status: "User Reviewed - Accepted" provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "DraftTextualContent" source_inputs: - {type: "document_content", reference: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0 content"} methodology_summary: "Generated L2 Comparative Evaluation Criteria by translating L2 Requirements into specific, weighted criteria." actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:55:00Z" monitoring_control: # ... (as in previous state, FID_perf_rev_001 is 'Completed') ... logs: # ... (decisions FID_DEC_001, FID_DEC_002 as in previous state) ... analysis_results: # ... (literature_reviews as in previous state, including FID_litrev_L2survey_001) ... knowledge_artifacts: # ... (content as in previous state) ... closure: {}