project_state: metadata: project_name: Foundational Information Dynamics project_code: FID project_type: Research & Development / Theoretical Physics primary_methodology: PBRF OMF v2.0 (Principle-Based Layered Approach) current_status: Monitoring # Temporarily, will shift to Planning Readiness after this schema_version_used: v4.0 last_modified_timestamp: 2025-05-10T18:35:00Z # Example actual timestamp exploration_history: # ... (content as in previous state) ... charter: # ... (content as in previous state) ... plan: version: '1.0' # Version remains 1.0, but status changes status: Under Revision # Updated wbs: # ... (Tasks 0.0 through 2.3 status: Completed, actual_durations filled) ... - id: '2.3' description: 'Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.2'] definition_of_done: Decision on primary candidate(s) made and documented with rationale. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['User-Decision', 'AI-AnalysisSupport'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "LogDecisions" specialized_process_inputs: { decision_made_reference: "User input on L2 formalism selection", rationale_reference: "User input and FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0 evaluation" } actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" - id: '2.4' description: 'Comparative Development & Initial Evaluation of L2 Formalism Candidates (e.g., Graph/Network Dynamics, Geometric Algebra streams).' # Updated parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.3'] definition_of_done: "Initial development and comparative evaluation criteria for selected L2 candidate streams (e.g., Graph/Network, GA) documented. Preliminary assessment of each stream's viability for FID goals (emergence, EQR) completed." # Updated is_summary_task: false # This task itself is not summary, but may have sub-tasks is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true # Produces evaluation reports status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Development', 'AI-Research', 'User-Guidance'] # Adjusted estimated_duration: 'Multi-sprint (Significant research effort)' # Adjusted specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Comparative development and evaluation of L2 Formalism Candidates for FID", source_material_references: ["FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", "FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_ComparativeEval_Report_v1.0" } # Output might be a report - id: '2.5' description: '(Milestone) Select & Validate Primary L2 Formalism Definition (or converged hybrid) based on comparative evaluation.' # Updated parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.4'] # Now depends on the new 2.4 definition_of_done: L2 Formalism definition (selected or hybrid) validated against PBRF SC2.1-SC2.4. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['User-Decision', 'AI-Critique', 'User-Validation'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "CritiqueArtifact" # And LogDecisions for selection specialized_process_inputs: { artifact_reference: "FID_L2_Selected_Formalism_Definition_vX.Y", critique_criteria_reference: "PBRF_Success_Criteria (SC2.1-SC2.4)", output_filename_base: "FID_L2_ValidationReport_v1.0" } # ... (rest of WBS Phase 3, 4, 5 as before, their dependencies on 2.5 remain) ... task_sequencing_notes: Work proceeds sequentially through Phases (0-5). Tasks within phases have specified dependencies. Validation milestones gate progress. Task 2.4 now involves comparative development. resource_plan_notes: Primary resource is User-AI collaboration. Computational resources for L3 simulations. Access to historical PBRF/EQR/Infomatics detailed docs if L2/L3 builds directly on them. quality_plan_notes: Adherence to PBRF OMF v2.0, FID KAs (StyleGuide, Glossary, SuccessMetrics). Layered validation against PBRF Success Criteria. PEAP for novel predictions. Rigorous self-critique (Meta-RefineOutput) by AI for key generated artifacts. risk_register: # ... (content as in previous state) ... change_management_process: Significant changes to scope, goals, or methodology require explicit user approval and documentation update (e.g., Charter/Plan revision). Decisions made during sprints logged in `project_state.logs.decisions`. methodology_specific_planning: Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0, emphasizing layered development, principle-first derivation, explicit success criteria (PBRF Success Criteria), fail-fast/pivot cycles, and PEAP for novel predictions. internal_review_summary: "Plan drafted based on PBRF OMF structure, covering all FID Charter goals through 5 distinct phases. Phases 0 & 1 reflect completed re-processing of historical work. Phases 2-5 outline new work for L2 formalism, L3 emergence, L4 novel predictions (with PEAP), and L5 final synthesis. Key decision: Structuring PEAP as a distinct phase (L4) for emphasis. WBS tasks assigned AI skills where appropriate. Durations are high-level estimates. Plan updated to reflect comparative L2 formalism development (Task 2.4)." # Updated flagged_critical_issues: [] execution: tasks: # ... (FID_exec_0.1_001 to FID_exec_2.2_001 as in previous state, all 'Completed') ... - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.3_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.3' status: Completed # ... (content as in previous state, reflecting decision FID_DEC_001) ... actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" monitoring_control: performance_reviews: - review_id: "FID_perf_rev_001" review_scope: "Overall project health and progress since last review/major checkpoint." status: "Completed" # Updated overall_health_assessment: "On Track, with strategic adaptation" key_findings_summary: "Phases 0 and 1 re-processed and confirmed. Phase 2 tasks 2.1-2.3 completed. Decision to explore multiple L2 candidates (Task 2.3) necessitates WBS revision for Task 2.4." proposed_interventions_or_actions: - item_id: "INT-001" description: "WBS Task 2.4 needs revision for multiple L2 candidate exploration." proposed_action_or_change: "Re-scope Task 2.4 to 'Comparative Development & Initial Evaluation of L2 Formalism Candidates'. Adjust subsequent L2 tasks." rationale: "Align plan with strategic decision from Task 2.3." user_decision: "Approved" linked_decision_id: "FID_DEC_002" decisions_made_by_user_summary: - "Approved re-scoping of Task 2.4 and related L2 plan adjustments." next_recommended_process: "02-Plan" issue_log: [] risk_register_updates: [] process_reviews: [] logs: decisions: - decision_id: FID_DEC_001 decision_made: "Defer selection of a single L2 formalism. Proceed with exploring multiple promising candidates, likely focusing on hybrid approaches or parallel investigation of Graph/Network Dynamics and Geometric Algebra." rationale: "Insufficient information to make a definitive single selection. Need to test multiple options to determine the most promising alternatives for FID, with a suspicion that a hybrid approach may be optimal." alternatives_considered: - "Selecting a single formalism (Graph/Network Dynamics or Geometric Algebra) at this stage." decision_maker: "User" status: "Logged" related_process_ref: "Task 2.3: Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)" date_made: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" - decision_id: FID_DEC_002 # New decision from this review decision_made: "Approve re-scoping of WBS Task 2.4 to 'Comparative Development & Initial Evaluation of L2 Formalism Candidates' and adjustment of subsequent L2 tasks to reflect exploration of multiple L2 candidates, following decision in Task 2.3." rationale: "To align the project plan with the strategic decision made in Task 2.3 (logged as FID_DEC_001), ensuring focused effort on the chosen exploratory path for L2 formalism." alternatives_considered: ["Not re-scoping Task 2.4 and attempting to force selection of a single formalism now."] decision_maker: "User" status: "Logged" related_process_ref: "Review FID_perf_rev_001 / Intervention INT-001" date_made: "2025-05-10T18:35:00Z" # Example timestamp insights: [] feedback_items: [] analysis_results: # ... (literature_reviews as in previous state, including FID_litrev_L2survey_001) ... knowledge_artifacts: # ... (content as in previous state) ... closure: {}