project_state: metadata: project_name: Foundational Information Dynamics project_code: FID project_type: Research & Development / Theoretical Physics primary_methodology: PBRF OMF v2.0 (Principle-Based Layered Approach) current_status: Executing # Paused for monitoring schema_version_used: v4.0 last_modified_timestamp: 2025-05-10T18:30:00Z # Example actual timestamp exploration_history: # ... (content as in previous state) ... charter: # ... (content as in previous state) ... plan: version: '1.0' status: Formalized wbs: # ... (Tasks 0.0 through 2.2 status: Completed) ... - id: '2.2' description: 'Survey & Evaluate Candidate Formalisms' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.1'] definition_of_done: Survey of potential formalisms (e.g., advanced network theory, GA, process calculus, DCIN NBM context) and evaluation against L2 requirements documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Research', 'User-Input'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "ConductFullLiteratureReview" specialized_process_inputs: { topic: "Mathematical/Computational Formalisms for Emergent Physics from Informational Principles", scope_description: "Formalisms capable of meeting FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", output_filename_base: "FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0" } actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:25:00Z" - id: '2.3' description: 'Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.2'] definition_of_done: Decision on primary candidate(s) made and documented with rationale. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed # Updated assigned_resources: ['User-Decision', 'AI-AnalysisSupport'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "LogDecisions" specialized_process_inputs: { decision_made_reference: "User input on L2 formalism selection", rationale_reference: "User input and FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0 evaluation" } actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" # Example - id: '2.4' description: 'Develop/Refine Specific L2 Formalism Definition (Iterative)' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.3'] definition_of_done: Detailed mathematical/computational definition of the chosen L2 formalism documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Development', 'User-Guidance'] estimated_duration: 'Multi-sprint' specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Detailed definition of selected L2 Formalism for FID", source_material_references: ["FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", "Selected Formalism Documentation"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_Formalism_Definition_vX.Y" } # ... (rest of WBS as in previous state) ... task_sequencing_notes: Work proceeds sequentially through Phases (0-5). Tasks within phases have specified dependencies. Validation milestones gate progress. resource_plan_notes: Primary resource is User-AI collaboration. Computational resources for L3 simulations. Access to historical PBRF/EQR/Infomatics detailed docs if L2/L3 builds directly on them. quality_plan_notes: Adherence to PBRF OMF v2.0, FID KAs (StyleGuide, Glossary, SuccessMetrics). Layered validation against PBRF Success Criteria. PEAP for novel predictions. Rigorous self-critique (Meta-RefineOutput) by AI for key generated artifacts. risk_register: # ... (content as in previous state) ... change_management_process: Significant changes to scope, goals, or methodology require explicit user approval and documentation update (e.g., Charter/Plan revision). Decisions made during sprints logged in `project_state.logs.decisions`. methodology_specific_planning: Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0, emphasizing layered development, principle-first derivation, explicit success criteria (PBRF Success Criteria), fail-fast/pivot cycles, and PEAP for novel predictions. internal_review_summary: "Plan drafted based on PBRF OMF structure, covering all FID Charter goals through 5 distinct phases. Phases 0 & 1 reflect completed re-processing of historical work. Phases 2-5 outline new work for L2 formalism, L3 emergence, L4 novel predictions (with PEAP), and L5 final synthesis. Key decision: Structuring PEAP as a distinct phase (L4) for emphasis. WBS tasks assigned AI skills where appropriate. Durations are high-level estimates." flagged_critical_issues: [] execution: tasks: # ... (FID_exec_0.1_001 to FID_exec_2.1_001 as in previous state) ... - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.2_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.2' status: Completed inputs_used: - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.plan.wbs - type: ai_skill_input reference: specialized_process_inputs from WBS task 2.2 - type: document_content reference: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0 content" proposed_approach: "Invoke ConductFullLiteratureReview skill to survey and evaluate candidate formalisms against FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0." execution_log: "Invoked ConductFullLiteratureReview skill. Skill generated literature review object FID_litrev_L2survey_001. Internal Meta-RefineOutput applied by skill. Summary deliverable FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0 presented to user and accepted." specialized_process_used: null ai_skill_invoked: "ConductFullLiteratureReview" output_data: type: "analysis_result_reference" analysis_result_ref: "project_state.analysis_results.literature_reviews[FID_litrev_L2survey_001]" internal_critique_summary: "ConductFullLiteratureReview skill executed with internal Meta-RefineOutput. Generated literature review object stored in analysis_results. Content appears aligned with task DoD." quality_check_status: "User Reviewed - Accepted" provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "ConductFullLiteratureReview" source_inputs: - {type: "ai_skill_input_parameter", reference: "topic: Mathematical/Computational Formalisms..."} - {type: "ai_skill_input_parameter", reference: "scope_description: Formalisms capable of meeting FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0"} - {type: "document_content", reference: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0 content"} methodology_summary: "Performed a conceptual literature review based on topic and scope, evaluating candidates against L2 requirements. Findings structured into a literature_review_report_object." actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:25:00Z" - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.3_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.3' status: Completed # Updated inputs_used: - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.plan.wbs - type: user_input reference: "User decision to defer single L2 formalism selection and explore multiple candidates." - type: document_content reference: "FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0 content" # For rationale context proposed_approach: "Invoke LogDecisions skill to record user's decision on L2 formalism selection strategy." execution_log: "User decided to defer single L2 formalism selection, opting to explore multiple candidates (hybrid/parallel). Invoked LogDecisions skill. Decision FID_DEC_001 logged." specialized_process_used: null ai_skill_invoked: "LogDecisions" output_data: type: "operation_status_report" content_inline: "{status: 'Success', message: 'Decision FID_DEC_001 logged.', details: {decision_object_snapshot: {decision_id: 'FID_DEC_001', decision_made: 'Defer selection of a single L2 formalism. Proceed with exploring multiple promising candidates, likely focusing on hybrid approaches or parallel investigation of Graph/Network Dynamics and Geometric Algebra.', rationale: 'Insufficient information to make a definitive single selection. Need to test multiple options to determine the most promising alternatives for FID, with a suspicion that a hybrid approach may be optimal.', alternatives_considered: ['Selecting a single formalism (Graph/Network Dynamics or Geometric Algebra) at this stage.'], decision_maker: 'User', status: 'Logged', related_process_ref: 'Task 2.3: Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)', date_made: '2025-05-10T18:30:00Z'}}}" # Example date format: "yaml_block" internal_critique_summary: "LogDecisions skill executed based on direct user input." quality_check_status: "User Reviewed - Accepted" # Decision content from user provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "LogDecisions" source_inputs: - {type: "user_prompt", reference: "User's decision on L2 formalism strategy"} methodology_summary: "Structured logging of user's strategic decision for L2 formalism selection." actual_duration: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" monitoring_control: # ... (as in previous state) ... logs: decisions: - decision_id: FID_DEC_001 decision_made: "Defer selection of a single L2 formalism. Proceed with exploring multiple promising candidates, likely focusing on hybrid approaches or parallel investigation of Graph/Network Dynamics and Geometric Algebra." rationale: "Insufficient information to make a definitive single selection. Need to test multiple options to determine the most promising alternatives for FID, with a suspicion that a hybrid approach may be optimal." alternatives_considered: - "Selecting a single formalism (Graph/Network Dynamics or Geometric Algebra) at this stage." decision_maker: "User" status: "Logged" related_process_ref: "Task 2.3: Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)" date_made: "2025-05-10T18:30:00Z" # Example actual timestamp insights: [] feedback_items: [] analysis_results: # ... (literature_reviews as in previous state, including FID_litrev_L2survey_001) ... knowledge_artifacts: # ... (content as in previous state) ... closure: {}