project_state: metadata: project_name: Foundational Information Dynamics project_code: FID project_type: Research & Development / Theoretical Physics primary_methodology: PBRF OMF v2.0 (Principle-Based Layered Approach) current_status: Executing schema_version_used: v4.0 last_modified_timestamp: # Current UTC Timestamp exploration_history: session_id: EXPLORE_20250510172530 initial_user_prompt: "Quantum information systems: a theory of quantum mechanics and Information states. [User also provided content from 'The Universe is Information (Vol 1 & 2)' during the session, emphasizing patterns, holographic principle, and information as fundamental.]" core_problem_summary: "Develop a new theoretical framework formally defining 'Information states' and their relationship with quantum mechanics, considering information as fundamental to the universe." high_level_goals_summary: - "Formally define 'Information states' and their relationship with quantum mechanics, within an information-centric universe model." - "Explore foundational aspects of such a theory, including how physical reality (patterns, laws, particles) emerges from information." - "Investigate the role of the Holographic Principle and its impact on understanding quantum mechanics through this informational lens." potential_deliverables_summary: - "A document detailing the new theoretical framework for information states and emergent reality." - "Analysis of foundational implications for quantum mechanics, including interpretations of emergence and the Holographic Principle." - "Exploration of how this theory addresses the emergence of stable patterns (particles/laws)." initial_scope_in_summary: - "Development of a new theoretical framework where 'Information States' are fundamental, exploring their relationship with quantum mechanics." - "Investigating the emergence of physical reality (spacetime, particles as stable patterns, physical laws) from underlying informational principles." - "Exploring the implications of the Holographic Principle within this informational framework." - "Analyzing the foundational impact of this theory on the interpretation of quantum mechanics." initial_scope_out_summary: - "Detailed engineering of quantum computers or communication systems." - "Specific predictions for high-energy particle phenomenology (initially)." key_concepts_identified: - "Quantum information systems" - "Quantum mechanics" - "Information states" - "Theoretical framework development" - "Foundational aspects of quantum theory" - "Universe as Information" - "Patterns (as fundamental)" - "Holographic Principle" - "Emergence (of reality from information)" - "Information as Ontological Primitive" confirmed_connections: - {source: "Quantum information systems", target: "Holographic Principle", relation: "Related Concept", rationale: "User confirmed: Suggests reality could be a projection of information."} - {source: "Patterns forming reality", target: "Emergence", relation: "Related Concept", rationale: "User confirmed: Key to understanding how complex physical patterns and laws arise from simpler informational rules."} - {source: "Quantum information systems", target: "Foundational Theoretical Development", relation: "Potential Methodology", rationale: "User confirmed: Necessary to formally define 'Information States' and their link to QM."} confirmed_expansions: [] known_unknowns: - "How do specific physical laws and particles (stable patterns) emerge from an underlying informational substrate?" parking_lot_ideas: [] exploration_log: - {actor: "User", content: "Initial prompt: Quantum information systems: a theory of quantum mechanics and Information states. Additional context: 'The Universe is Information (Vol 1 & 2)'."} - {actor: "AI", content: "Based on your input (from IdeaExploration_exp_session_qis_001.md and 'The Universe is Information' texts) and internal refinement, this is a preliminary understanding: [Summaries presented] Is this refined interpretation generally accurate?"} - {actor: "User", content: "Yes"} - {actor: "AI", content: "To further explore '[Main Idea/Concept]', consider these associations: [Holographic Principle, Emergence, Foundational Theoretical Development, Key Question presented] For each item: [Validation questions]"} - {actor: "User", content: "yes to all"} - {actor: "AI", content: "Based on our discussion, here's a proposed initial scope: [Scope In/Out presented] Is this proposed scope generally accurate?"} - {actor: "User", content: "yes"} charter: version: '1.1' status: Formalized vision_statement: To develop a self-consistent, parsimonious, and fundamentally grounded theoretical framework based on informational principles, capable of deriving the emergent properties of physical reality and, through rigorous internal validation, making novel predictions that may challenge and potentially supersede incomplete aspects of conventional scientific wisdom. core_problem_motivation: 'The current paradigms of fundamental physics (Standard Model, General Relativity, ΛCDM cosmology), despite their successes, are demonstrably incomplete and face profound internal inconsistencies, conceptual paradoxes, and reliance on ad-hoc entities (e.g., dark sector). Foundational critiques (e.g., `Mathematical Tricks Postulate.md`, `Exposing the Flaws in Conventional Scientific Wisdom.md`, and the analysis of metrological issues in `FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md`) suggest these problems may stem from flawed foundational assumptions, mathematical artifices designed to fit data rather than explain, and a scientific culture that can be resistant to challenging established benchmarks, however incomplete they may be. The **Foundational Information Dynamics (FID) project** is motivated by the hypothesis that a deeper layer of reality, grounded in informational principles, can provide a more coherent, complete, and ultimately more predictive explanation. The core problem is to **discover and formalize these principles and dynamics**, learning from prior research (as synthesized in `FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md`). A key aspect of this problem is **developing a methodology to distinguish between genuine failures of a new model versus its correct prediction of phenomena currently unknown or misinterpreted by conventional, potentially flawed, paradigms** (e.g., the Infomatics Î₁ ''infoton'' case).' background_context: Built upon initial exploration of 'Information states' in quantum mechanics (exp_session_qis_001) and evolved through analysis of frameworks like Infomatics, PBRF, and lessons learned from IO/LCRF/CEE/FCE projects, culminating in the insights of FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md. high_level_goals: - 'Goal 1: Establish Rigorous Foundational Principles (L0) and Conceptual Framework (L1) for FID.' - 'Goal 2: Identify/Develop and Validate a Viable Layer 2 Formalism Capable of Generating Emergent Structure.' - 'Goal 3: Demonstrate Emergence of Key Physical Features and EQR Compatibility (L3).' - 'Goal 4: Generate Novel, Testable Predictions and Employ the "Protocol for Evaluating Anomalous Predictions (PEAP)" to Distinguish Model Failure from Potential Discovery.' - 'Goal 5: Achieve Explanatory Parsimony, Unification, and a Re-evaluation of "Fundamental" Constants and Laws.' specific_objectives: - Successfully execute Phase 0 (Foundational Synthesis). - Validate Layer 0 Axioms for FID. - Validate Layer 1 Conceptual Framework for FID. - Assess readiness for Layer 2 formalism search based on PEAP principles. - (Future) Develop and validate L2/L3 models. - (Ultimate) Produce a validated FID framework with novel, potentially paradigm-shifting insights. scope_in: - Foundational informational principles. - Emergence of spacetime, particles (as stable patterns), forces. - Grounding EQR v1.0. - Development of novel L0/L1/L2 formalisms. - Logical/mathematical consistency. - Generation of novel predictions. - Critical assessment of conventional empirical standards when robust FID predictions conflict. scope_out: - Specific engineering applications (initially). - Detailed quantitative matching to all SM parameters (initial focus is structural emergence and novel qualitative/structural predictions). - Unquestioning acceptance of all current SM/GR interpretations as absolute truth. key_deliverables: - FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md - FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0.md - FID_ParkingLot_v1.0.md - FID_Charter_v1.1 - Validated Layer 0 Axioms and Layer 1 Conceptual Framework for FID. - A validated Layer 2 Formalism for FID. - (Future) Documented novel predictions, L3 simulation results, final validated FID framework. key_assumptions: - Information plays a fundamental, potentially primary, role in reality. - A consistent, principle-based description of reality is possible. - Current empirical "knowns" and theoretical "laws" may be incomplete or represent effective descriptions of a deeper reality. Robust, internally consistent predictions from FID that conflict with these are not *a priori* falsifications of FID but may indicate limitations in conventional wisdom. - The chosen layered methodology (PBRF OMF v2.0, augmented by PEAP) is effective. - User/AI collaboration can effectively drive this critical inquiry. key_constraints: - Adherence to principle-first derivation. - Limitations of User/AI reasoning. - Computational resource limits for L3. - The challenge of distinguishing genuine novel predictions from model artifacts or errors, even with PEAP. initial_risk_assessment: - "R01: Substrate/Dynamics Definition - Failure to define L0/L1/L2 that robustly generates stable, diverse emergent structures. (High Likelihood, Critical Impact; Mitigation: PBRF OMF, fail-fast, Synthesis lessons)." - "R02: EQR Grounding - Inability to derive/integrate EQR v1.0. (Medium-High Likelihood, High Impact; Mitigation: Core L2/L3 requirement)." - "R03: Formalism Intractability - L2 proves analytically or computationally intractable. (Medium Likelihood, High Impact; Mitigation: Early feasibility checks, modularity)." - "R04: Novel Prediction Interpretation - Difficulty applying PEAP or convincing community. (High Likelihood, High Impact; Mitigation: Rigor in PEAP, clear critique of benchmarks, propose verification paths)." - "R05: Paradigm Inertia - Resistance to challenges to established models. (Very High Likelihood, Medium Impact on acceptance; Mitigation: Rigor, clear advantages, empirical tests)." success_criteria_summary: Successful validation of each development layer (L0-L3) per PBRF Success Criteria ([[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0214_PBRF_Success_Criteria]]). Generation of robust, internally consistent novel predictions which, after rigorous application of PEAP, are classified as credible "Potential Discoveries" challenging or extending conventional understanding. Ultimate success is a validated FID framework offering significant explanatory advantages, parsimony, unification, and compelling, potentially verifiable, new insights into reality. plan: version: '1.0' status: Formalized wbs: - id: '0.0' description: 'Phase 0: Foundational Synthesis & Knowledge Consolidation' parent_id: null dependencies: [] definition_of_done: All Phase 0 deliverables (Synthesis Doc, Refined Goals, Parking Lot, Charter v1.1) generated and approved by User. Readiness for subsequent phase planning confirmed. is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Synthesis', 'User-Review'] estimated_duration: 'N/A (Completed)' actual_duration: 'N/A (Completed)' - id: '0.1' description: 'Systematic Review: AI processes all provided historical project files.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: [] definition_of_done: AI confirms processing of all relevant input files identified. Internal knowledge base updated. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Processing'] specialized_process_inputs: { source_files_list_reference: "/archive/projects/FID/source_collateral/" } ai_skill_to_invoke: "NoOp" - id: '0.2' description: 'Knowledge Extraction: AI extracts key elements.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.1'] definition_of_done: Structured data or internal representation of extracted knowledge created. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "NoOp" - id: '0.3' description: 'Identify Core Threads & Challenges: AI analyzes extracted knowledge.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.2'] definition_of_done: Internal analysis complete, key threads/challenges identified. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "NoOp" - id: '0.4' description: 'Synthesize Baseline Document: AI generates FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.3'] definition_of_done: Draft synthesis document generated and approved by user. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] specialized_process_inputs: { topic: "FID Historical Context", output_filename_base: "FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0" } ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" - id: '0.5' description: 'Refine Core Problem/Goals: AI proposes FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.4'] definition_of_done: Draft refined goals document generated and approved by user. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] specialized_process_inputs: { source_document_ref: "FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0", output_filename_base: "FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0" } ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" - id: '0.6' description: 'Update Parking Lot: AI generates FID_ParkingLot_v1.0.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.3'] definition_of_done: Draft parking lot document generated and approved by user. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] specialized_process_inputs: { source_analysis_ref: "project_state.analysis_results.skill_outputs[...]", output_filename_base: "FID_ParkingLot_v1.0" } ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" - id: '0.7' description: 'Revise Charter: AI proposes FID_Charter_v1.1.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.5'] definition_of_done: Draft revised charter generated and approved by user. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] specialized_process_inputs: { base_charter_ref: "FID_Charter_v1.0", goals_ref: "FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0", output_filename_base: "FID_Charter_v1.1" } ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" - id: '0.8' description: 'Phase 0 Review & Approval: User approves Phase 0 completion.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.4', '0.5', '0.6', '0.7'] definition_of_done: User explicitly approves all Phase 0 deliverables. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['User-Validation'] - id: '1.0' description: 'Phase 1: FID Layer 1 Concept Development' parent_id: null dependencies: ['0.8'] definition_of_done: FID L1 Conceptual Framework validated and documented. Decision on L2 readiness made. is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Research', 'User-Validation'] estimated_duration: 'N/A (Completed)' actual_duration: 'N/A (Completed)' - id: '1.1' description: 'Re-validate/Refine PBRF L0 Axioms for FID Context' parent_id: '1.0' dependencies: ['0.8'] definition_of_done: Finalized FID L0 Axioms documented and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis', 'User-Review'] - id: '1.1.1' description: 'Review PBRF L0 Axioms against FID Historical Synthesis & Refined Goals.' parent_id: '1.1' dependencies: ['0.8'] definition_of_done: Review complete, areas for potential refinement identified. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis'] - id: '1.1.2' description: 'Propose necessary refinements/adaptations to L0 axioms for FID (Output: FID_L0_Axiom_Refinements_Proposal_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.1' dependencies: ['1.1.1'] definition_of_done: Proposed L0 refinements documented and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Refinements for PBRF L0 Axioms for FID", source_material_references: ["FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0", "FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0", "/archive/projects/FID/source_collateral/projects/PBRF/0216_PBRF_Layer0_Axioms_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L0_Axiom_Refinements_Proposal_v1.0" } - id: '1.1.3' description: 'Document Finalized FID L0 Axioms (Output: FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.1' dependencies: ['1.1.2'] definition_of_done: FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Finalized FID L0 Axioms", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axiom_Refinements_Proposal_v1.0", "/archive/projects/FID/source_collateral/projects/PBRF/0216_PBRF_Layer0_Axioms_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0" } - id: '1.2' description: 'Derive FID Layer 1 Conceptual Framework' parent_id: '1.0' dependencies: ['1.1.3'] definition_of_done: All core L1 concepts and qualitative mechanisms derived from FID L0 and documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Research', 'User-Review'] - id: '1.2.1' description: 'Define L1 Concepts - Core Dynamics (Output: FID_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.2' dependencies: ['1.1.3'] definition_of_done: FID_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L1 Concepts: Core Dynamics", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_v1.0" } - id: '1.2.2' description: 'Define L1 Concepts - Emergent Structure & Stability (Output: FID_L1_Concepts_Structure_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.2' dependencies: ['1.1.3'] definition_of_done: FID_L1_Concepts_Structure_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L1 Concepts: Emergent Structure & Stability", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_Concepts_Structure_v1.0" } - id: '1.2.3' description: 'Define L1 Concepts - Interaction & Influence (Output: FID_L1_Concepts_Interaction_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.2' dependencies: ['1.1.3'] definition_of_done: FID_L1_Concepts_Interaction_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L1 Concepts: Interaction & Influence", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_Concepts_Interaction_v1.0" } - id: '1.2.4' description: 'Derive Qualitative Mechanisms for generic reality features (Output: FID_L1_Mechanisms_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.2' dependencies: ['1.2.1', '1.2.2', '1.2.3'] definition_of_done: FID_L1_Mechanisms_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L1 Qualitative Mechanisms", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Structure_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Interaction_v1.0"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_Mechanisms_v1.0" } - id: '1.3' description: 'FID Layer 1 Internal Assessment & URFE Preparation' parent_id: '1.0' dependencies: ['1.2'] definition_of_done: Internal consistency checks documented; Draft L1 URFE response generated. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis', 'User-Review'] - id: '1.3.1' description: 'Perform internal consistency checks and adversarial thought experiments on FID L1.' parent_id: '1.3' dependencies: ['1.2'] definition_of_done: Assessment documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Critique'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "CritiqueArtifact" specialized_process_inputs: { artifact_reference: "FID L1 Conceptual Framework (all docs 1.2.1-1.2.4)", critique_focus_areas: ["Internal Consistency", "Alignment with L0", "Explanatory Power for URFE questions"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_InternalAssessment_v1.0" } - id: '1.3.2' description: 'Draft FID L1 URFE Response (Output: FID_L1_URFE_Response_Draft_v1.0).' parent_id: '1.3' dependencies: ['1.3.1'] definition_of_done: FID_L1_URFE_Response_Draft_v1.0 generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Completed assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L1 URFE Response", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Structure_v1.0", "FID_L1_Concepts_Interaction_v1.0", "FID_L1_Mechanisms_v1.0", "/archive/projects/FID/source_collateral/Ultimate Reality Framework Examination"], output_filename_base: "FID_L1_URFE_Response_Draft_v1.0" } - id: '1.4' description: '(Milestone) FID L1 Conceptual Framework Validation' parent_id: '1.0' dependencies: ['1.3'] definition_of_done: User reviews all L1 deliverables and approves L1 validation. Decision on L2 readiness made and logged. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: false status: Completed assigned_resources: ['User-Validation'] - id: '2.0' description: 'Phase 2: L2 Formalism Search & Definition' parent_id: null dependencies: ['1.4'] definition_of_done: Primary L2 formalism selected, defined, and validated against L2 criteria (PBRF SC2.1-SC2.4). is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Research', 'User-Guidance', 'User-Validation'] estimated_duration: 'Significant research effort' - id: '2.1' description: 'Define L2 Formalism Requirements' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['1.4'] definition_of_done: Document detailing L2 requirements (must embody L0/L1, support structure emergence, EQR grounding, testability) generated and approved. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: In Progress # Current task assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "DraftTextualContent" specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "FID L2 Formalism Requirements", source_material_references: ["FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0", "FID_L1_Conceptual_Framework (all docs)", "FID_Charter_v1.1 (Goal 2, EQR)"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0" } - id: '2.2' description: 'Survey & Evaluate Candidate Formalisms' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.1'] definition_of_done: Survey of potential formalisms (e.g., advanced network theory, GA, process calculus, DCIN NBM context) and evaluation against L2 requirements documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Research', 'User-Input'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "ConductFullLiteratureReview" specialized_process_inputs: { topic: "Mathematical/Computational Formalisms for Emergent Physics from Informational Principles", scope_description: "Formalisms capable of meeting FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", output_filename_base: "FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0" } - id: '2.3' description: 'Select Primary L2 Formalism Candidate(s)' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.2'] definition_of_done: Decision on primary candidate(s) made and documented with rationale. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['User-Decision', 'AI-AnalysisSupport'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "LogDecisions" specialized_process_inputs: { decision_made_reference: "User input on L2 formalism selection", rationale_reference: "User input and FID_L2_FormalismSurvey_v1.0 evaluation" } - id: '2.4' description: 'Develop/Refine Specific L2 Formalism Definition (Iterative)' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.3'] definition_of_done: Detailed mathematical/computational definition of the chosen L2 formalism documented. is_summary_task: false is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Development', 'User-Guidance'] estimated_duration: 'Multi-sprint' specialized_process_inputs: { content_topic_or_prompt: "Detailed definition of selected L2 Formalism for FID", source_material_references: ["FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0", "Selected Formalism Documentation"], output_filename_base: "FID_L2_Formalism_Definition_vX.Y" } - id: '2.5' description: '(Milestone) Validate L2 Formalism Definition' parent_id: '2.0' dependencies: ['2.4'] definition_of_done: L2 Formalism definition validated against PBRF SC2.1-SC2.4 (specific, justified embodiment of L0/L1, consistent, represents concepts). is_summary_task: false is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Critique', 'User-Validation'] ai_skill_to_invoke: "CritiqueArtifact" specialized_process_inputs: { artifact_reference: "FID_L2_Formalism_Definition_vX.Y", critique_criteria_reference: "PBRF_Success_Criteria (SC2.1-SC2.4)", output_filename_base: "FID_L2_ValidationReport_v1.0" } - id: '3.0' description: 'Phase 3: L3 Modeling & Validation (Emergence & EQR)' parent_id: null dependencies: ['2.5'] definition_of_done: L2 formalism implemented; emergence of structures and EQR compatibility tested and validated against PBRF SC3.1-SC3.5. is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Development', 'AI-Simulation', 'User-Validation'] estimated_duration: 'Significant research effort' - id: '4.0' description: 'Phase 4: Novel Predictions & PEAP Application' parent_id: null dependencies: ['3.0'] definition_of_done: Novel predictions derived, PEAP applied, outcomes documented. is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Analysis', 'User-Guidance', 'User-Validation'] estimated_duration: 'Significant research effort' - id: '5.0' description: 'Phase 5: Final Synthesis, Unification, and Reporting' parent_id: null dependencies: ['4.0'] definition_of_done: Final FID framework documented, explanatory power assessed, project closed or next steps defined. is_summary_task: true is_milestone: true produces_human_deliverable: true status: Not Started assigned_resources: ['AI-Drafting', 'User-Review'] estimated_duration: 'Multi-sprint' task_sequencing_notes: Work proceeds sequentially through Phases (0-5). Tasks within phases have specified dependencies. Validation milestones gate progress. resource_plan_notes: Primary resource is User-AI collaboration. Computational resources for L3 simulations. Access to historical PBRF/EQR/Infomatics detailed docs if L2/L3 builds directly on them. quality_plan_notes: Adherence to PBRF OMF v2.0, FID KAs (StyleGuide, Glossary, SuccessMetrics). Layered validation against PBRF Success Criteria. PEAP for novel predictions. Rigorous self-critique (Meta-RefineOutput) by AI for key generated artifacts. risk_register: - id: R01 description: Substrate/Dynamics Definition - Failure to define L0/L1/L2 that robustly generates stable, diverse emergent structures. likelihood: High impact: Critical response_strategy: PBRF OMF layered validation, fail-fast, learning from Synthesis. owner: AI/User status: Open - id: R02 description: EQR Grounding - Inability to derive/integrate EQR v1.0. likelihood: Medium-High impact: High response_strategy: Core L2/L3 requirement; iterative refinement of L2/L3 or EQR understanding. owner: AI/User status: Open - id: R03 description: Formalism Intractability - L2 proves analytically or computationally intractable for L3 validation. likelihood: Medium impact: High response_strategy: Early feasibility checks in L2 development, modular L2 design, focus on qualitative/structural validation initially. owner: AI/User status: Open - id: R04 description: Novel Prediction Interpretation - Difficulty in rigorously applying PEAP to distinguish genuine novel predictions from model flaws, or in convincing the broader scientific community. likelihood: High impact: High response_strategy: Extreme rigor in PEAP steps (IRC, BCA, CEPU); clear articulation of critique of conventional benchmarks; focus on proposing decisive verification paths. owner: AI/User status: Open - id: R05 description: Paradigm Inertia - Resistance from conventional scientific viewpoints to consider challenges to established models. likelihood: Very High impact: Medium response_strategy: Focus on rigorous internal consistency, clear articulation of explanatory advantages, and proposing compelling empirical tests. owner: User status: Open change_management_process: Significant changes to scope, goals, or methodology require explicit user approval and documentation update (e.g., Charter/Plan revision). Decisions made during sprints logged in `project_state.logs.decisions`. methodology_specific_planning: Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0, emphasizing layered development, principle-first derivation, explicit success criteria (PBRF Success Criteria), fail-fast/pivot cycles, and PEAP for novel predictions. internal_review_summary: "Plan drafted based on PBRF OMF structure, covering all FID Charter goals through 5 distinct phases. Phases 0 & 1 reflect completed re-processing of historical work. Phases 2-5 outline new work for L2 formalism, L3 emergence, L4 novel predictions (with PEAP), and L5 final synthesis. Key decision: Structuring PEAP as a distinct phase (L4) for emphasis. WBS tasks assigned AI skills where appropriate. Durations are high-level estimates." flagged_critical_issues: [] execution: tasks: - task_execution_id: FID_exec_0.1_001 # Example, many would exist for Phase 0 & 1 task_id_from_plan: '0.1' status: Completed # ... other fields for completed tasks ... - task_execution_id: FID_exec_1.4_001 # Example for L1 validation milestone task_id_from_plan: '1.4' status: Completed # ... - task_execution_id: FID_exec_2.1_001 task_id_from_plan: '2.1' status: Completed # Updated from In Progress inputs_used: - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.charter - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.knowledge_artifacts.glossaries[0] # FID_Glossary - type: project_state_path reference: project_state.plan.wbs # for task definition - type: ai_skill_input reference: specialized_process_inputs from WBS task 2.1 proposed_approach: "Invoke DraftTextualContent skill with L0 Axioms, L1 Concepts, and Charter Goal 2/EQR needs as source material to generate FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0." execution_log: "Invoked DraftTextualContent skill. Skill generated draft of FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0. Internal Meta-RefineOutput applied by skill. Output presented to user and accepted." specialized_process_used: null ai_skill_invoked: "DraftTextualContent" output_data: type: "document_simple_text" content_reference: "FID_L2_Requirements_v1.0" # Base filename content_inline: | # Foundational Information Dynamics (FID) - Layer 2 Formalism Requirements v1.0 ## 1. Introduction This document outlines the core requirements for a Layer 2 (L2) mathematical/computational formalism for the Foundational Information Dynamics (FID) project. The L2 formalism must serve as a rigorous bridge between the FID Layer 0 (L0) Axioms and Layer 1 (L1) Conceptual Framework, and the Layer 3 (L3) goal of demonstrating emergent physical phenomena, including compatibility with the Emergent Quantization from Resolution (EQR v1.0) framework. ## 2. Guiding Principles from FID Charter & L0/L1 The L2 formalism must be developed in strict adherence to: * **FID Charter (v1.1):** Particularly Goal 2 ("Identify/Develop and Validate a Viable Layer 2 Formalism Capable of Generating Emergent Structure") and the need to ground EQR (Goal 3). * **FID L0 Axioms (v1.0):** The formalism must be a direct embodiment or allow for the operationalization of P1 (Existence & Dynamics), P2 (Principled Conditionality), P3 (Finite Propagation & Locality within emergent structures), P4 (Pattern Formation & Persistence), P5 (Contextuality & Resolution), P6 (Consistency & Conservation), and P7 (Emergence Potential). * **FID L1 Conceptual Framework (v1.0):** The formalism must provide a means to define and model L1 concepts such as Event, Sequence, Information, Resolution, Pattern, Structure, Influence, Causality, Context, and System. ## 3. Core Requirements for L2 Formalism ### 3.1. Embodiment of L0 Axioms & L1 Concepts * **REQ-L2-001:** The formalism must provide clear, unambiguous mathematical/computational constructs that directly correspond to, or allow for the derivation of, each FID L0 Axiom. * **REQ-L2-002:** The formalism must enable the operational definition and dynamic modeling of all core FID L1 concepts. For example: * **Events:** Representable as discrete state transitions or fundamental operations within the formalism. * **Patterns/Structures:** Definable as persistent, recognizable configurations or sub-graphs within the formalism's state space. * **Information:** Quantifiable or qualifiable as distinctions between states/patterns. * **Influence/Causality:** Modelable as conditional dependencies or propagation rules within the formalism. * **Resolution/Context:** Formalism must allow for interaction-dependent resolution limits and contextual influences on dynamics. ### 3.2. Support for Emergence of Stable, Diverse Structures * **REQ-L2-003 (Critical):** The formalism's intrinsic dynamics must demonstrably lead to the spontaneous formation and persistence of diverse, stable, localized structures from simpler initial conditions or a less structured substrate. These structures are the L2 candidates for L3 particle analogues. * **REQ-L2-004:** The formalism must provide mechanisms or parameters that govern the stability, properties (e.g., mass-analogue, interaction-type-analogue), and interaction rules of these emergent structures. * **REQ-L2-005:** The formalism should ideally offer insights into why certain types of structures are preferred or more stable than others (selection principles). ### 3.3. Compatibility with EQR v1.0 * **REQ-L2-006:** The formalism, when modeling interactions between emergent structures (and potentially an "apparatus" structure), must provide a pathway to satisfying the EQR v1.0 substrate requirements (S1-S5): * **(S1) Continuum Analogue:** Support for states behaving as if in a continuous vector space (or a sufficiently dense discrete analogue for effective Hilbert space behavior). * **(S2) Interactions:** Definable interactions between emergent structures. * **(S3) Resonance/Stability Basis:** Dynamics leading to preferred, discrete, stable outcome states/modes for interactions (the EQR basis $|k\rangle$). * **(S4) Linearity/Overlap Analogue:** Ability to calculate effective overlap amplitudes whose squared magnitude can be interpreted as interaction strength or probability. * **(S5) Fundamental Scale Analogue:** Incorporation or emergence of a fundamental action/information scale ($j_0 \approx \hbar$ analogue). * **REQ-L2-007:** The formalism should allow for modeling the EQR postulates P1-P6 conceptually, even if full quantitative derivation of the Born rule is an L3 target. ### 3.4. Mathematical and Computational Properties * **REQ-L2-008:** The formalism must be mathematically self-consistent and well-defined. * **REQ-L2-009:** The formalism should be amenable to computational implementation for L3 modeling and simulation, even if simplifications or approximations are necessary. * **REQ-L2-010:** The formalism should strive for parsimony in its fundamental entities and rules, avoiding excessive ad-hoc parameters. ### 3.5. Testability and Potential for Novel Predictions * **REQ-L2-011:** While L3 is for detailed predictions, the L2 formalism itself should be structured such that it inherently allows for the derivation of unique, potentially testable consequences regarding emergent structures and their interactions. * **REQ-L2-012:** The formalism should not be "hard-coded" to merely reproduce known physics but should arise naturally from L0/L1, allowing for the possibility of novel emergent phenomena (relevant for PEAP in L4). ## 4. Evaluation Criteria for Candidate Formalisms Candidate L2 formalisms will be evaluated against their ability to meet the above requirements, with particular emphasis on REQ-L2-003 (emergence of stable, diverse structures) and REQ-L2-006 (EQR compatibility). The PBRF Success Criteria SC2.1-SC2.4 will be applied for final validation of the chosen L2 formalism definition. format: "markdown" internal_critique_summary: "DraftTextualContent skill executed with internal Meta-RefineOutput. Output reviewed against task DoD; appears comprehensive and aligned with source materials." quality_check_status: "User Reviewed - Accepted" provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "DraftTextualContent" source_inputs: - {type: "project_state_path", reference: "project_state.charter.goals[1]"} # Goal 2 - {type: "project_state_path", reference: "project_state.knowledge_artifacts.glossaries[0].terms[EQR]"} - {type: "document_content", reference: "FID_L0_Axioms_v1.0 content"} - {type: "document_content", reference: "FID_L1_Concepts_Framework content"} methodology_summary: "Generated L2 requirements by synthesizing constraints from L0 Axioms, L1 Concepts, Charter Goal 2, and EQR grounding needs. Structured according to standard requirements documentation principles." monitoring_control: performance_reviews: [] issue_log: [] risk_register_updates: [] process_reviews: [] logs: decisions: [] insights: [] feedback_items: [] analysis_results: critiques: [] data_analyses: [] literature_reviews: [] logic_analyses: [] formalism_assessments: [] skill_outputs: [] knowledge_artifacts: style_guides: - id: FID_StyleGuide version: '1.0' status: Active last_updated_process_ref: "01-Initiate" content: tone_voice: "Formal, objective, rigorous, precise, academic. Avoid overly speculative or informal language in core definitions and arguments. Maintain clarity for an interdisciplinary audience where possible, but prioritize technical accuracy." grammar_punctuation: "Standard scientific English conventions. Consistency in terminology is crucial (referencing FID_Glossary)." capitalization: "Standard English rules. Key framework names (PBRF, EQR, FID, DCIN) capitalized. Layer designations (Layer 0, Layer 1) capitalized. Specific principles (P1-P7) capitalized." formatting: "Use Markdown. Employ headings, lists, bolding for emphasis/definitions, italics for foreign terms or occasional emphasis. Use code blocks for equations or pseudo-code. Consistent file naming conventions (e.g., FID_Concept_Name_vX.Y)." terminology_glossary_ref: "FID_Glossary" citations_references: "Use consistent citation style (e.g., APA, Chicago - User to specify preference if needed, otherwise default to clear inline references like [[Node_ID]]). Maintain bibliography if external sources are used." figures_tables: "Use clear labels, captions, and consistent formatting if figures/tables are generated." provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "01-Initiate" methodology_summary: "Drafted based on general scientific/academic writing standards, refined via Meta-RefineOutput." glossaries: - id: FID_Glossary version: '1.0' status: Active last_updated_process_ref: "01-Initiate" terms: - term: PBRF (Principle-Based Reality Framework) definition: The current methodological approach within the FID project, emphasizing layered development derived from foundational principles (P1-P7) and avoiding premature commitment to standard formalisms. Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0. notes: "Key methodology for FID." status: Confirmed - term: EQR (Emergent Quantization from Resolution) definition: A conceptual framework (v1.0) describing quantum manifestation via interaction, stability-based basis selection, Born-rule probabilities, state updates, and information limits (j0). Serves as a target description for the observational interface in PBRF/FID. notes: "Central concept for QM interpretation in FID." status: Confirmed - term: Information (FID L1) definition: That which enables or constitutes distinguishability between configurations, Events, or patterns of Events. It is the content that allows one state of affairs to be recognized as different from another, relative to a given Context and Resolution. notes: "Derived from FID L0 P1, P2, P5. Differs from Shannon info." status: Confirmed # Updated from Proposed as L1 is complete - term: Event (FID L1) definition: A fundamental, actualized unit of change within the FID framework, representing a specific, distinguishable transition from one configuration to a subsequent configuration. notes: "Derived from FID L0 P1, P5." status: Confirmed - term: Pattern (FID L1) definition: Any recognizable correlation, repetition, regularity, or organized configuration within the sequence of events or relations, distinguishable at some Resolution. Represents organized Information. notes: "Key for emergent structures (particles, laws)." status: Confirmed - term: Holographic Principle definition: The principle suggesting that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary. notes: "Key concept from exploration history." status: Confirmed - term: Emergence definition: The arising of novel and coherent structures, patterns, and properties during the process of self-organization in complex systems. notes: "Central to FID's goal of deriving reality from informational principles." status: Confirmed - term: PEAP (Protocol for Evaluating Anomalous Predictions) definition: A methodology to distinguish between genuine failures of a new model versus its correct prediction of phenomena currently unknown or misinterpreted by conventional paradigms. notes: "Key for FID Goal 4." status: Confirmed provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "01-Initiate" methodology_summary: "Initial terms extracted from Charter, Exploration, and source collateral (FID_Glossary_v1.0.md). Definitions drafted/adapted and refined via Meta-RefineOutput." success_metrics: - id: FID_Metrics version: '1.0' status: Active last_updated_process_ref: "01-Initiate" project_success_criteria: - goal_ref: "FID Charter - Goal 1" metrics: - "Validation of FID L0 Axioms and L1 Conceptual Framework against PBRF SC1.1-SC1.4." - goal_ref: "FID Charter - Goal 2" metrics: - "Identification and validation of a FID L2 Formalism against PBRF SC2.1-SC2.4, demonstrating capacity for emergent structure." - goal_ref: "FID Charter - Goal 3" metrics: - "Validation of FID L3 models demonstrating emergence of key physical features and EQR compatibility against PBRF SC3.1-SC3.5." - goal_ref: "FID Charter - Goal 4" metrics: - "Generation of robust, internally consistent novel predictions from FID." - "Rigorous application of PEAP to these predictions, classifying them as potential discoveries or model refinements." - goal_ref: "FID Charter - Goal 5" metrics: - "Demonstrable explanatory parsimony or unification offered by the FID framework compared to standard models." - goal_ref: "Ultimate Project Success" metrics: - "A validated FID framework offering significant explanatory advantages, parsimony, unification, and compelling, potentially verifiable, new insights into reality." deliverable_acceptance_criteria: - deliverable_ref: "FID_Charter_v1.1" criteria: - "Approved by User, accurately reflects project scope and approach." - deliverable_ref: "FID L0 Axioms Document" criteria: - "Meets PBRF SC0.x criteria (if defined, else internal consistency and alignment with FID goals)." - deliverable_ref: "FID L1 Conceptual Framework Documents" criteria: - "Meets PBRF SC1.1-SC1.4 (concepts defined from L0, mechanisms derived, internally consistent, sufficient URFE scope)." task_dod_summary: - task_ref: "Generic Task" dod_summary: "Task output generated and documented according to OMF. Internal AI self-critique performed. Output validated/approved by User or meets pre-defined automated checks. Project state updated correctly." provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "01-Initiate" methodology_summary: "Derived from FID Charter goals, objectives, deliverables, and PBRF OMF success criteria. Refined via Meta-RefineOutput." collaboration_guidelines: - id: FID_CollabGuide version: '1.0' status: Active last_updated_process_ref: "01-Initiate" content: communication_style: "User provides clear, explicit instructions and feedback. AI provides structured, justified responses, asks clarifying questions when needed, and clearly signals task completion or blockers. Maintain concise, action-oriented 'machine voice'." task_management_workflow: "User initiates major project phases or milestone objectives. AI autonomously plans and executes tasks per PBRF OMF, using templates. AI reports progress, flags issues, presents deliverables/decisions for user validation. User provides strategic direction and validates outcomes." feedback_revision: "AI proactively performs self-critique (Meta-RefineOutput) on its outputs before milestone presentation. User provides specific feedback. AI incorporates revisions and confirms understanding." handling_disagreements: "AI flags inconsistencies or risks. User reviews AI's assessment and makes final decision, logged if significant." tool_platform_usage: "Primary interaction via this platform. Markdown for documentation. User manages file saving (extension-less base filenames for references)." availability_response: "AI available during active sessions. User manages session start/end and project pacing." provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: "01-Initiate" methodology_summary: "Drafted based on general best practices for User-AI research and PBRF OMF principles. Refined via Meta-RefineOutput." framework_states: [] parameter_ledgers: [] closure: {}