project_state: metadata: project_name: Foundational Information Dynamics project_code: FID project_id: FID project_type: Research & Development / Theoretical Physics primary_methodology: PBRF OMF v2.0 (Principle-Based Layered Approach) current_status: Executing schema_version_used: v3.4 exploration_history: session_id: exp_session_qis_001 initial_user_prompt: "Quantum information systems: a theory of quantum mechanics and Information states." core_problem_summary: "Develop a new theoretical framework formally defining 'Information states' and their relationship with quantum mechanics." high_level_goals_summary: - "Formally define 'Information states' and their relationship with quantum mechanics." - "Explore foundational aspects of such a theory, including its impact on understanding quantum mechanics." - "Explore implications of this theory for quantum computation or quantum information processing." potential_deliverables_summary: - "A document detailing the new theoretical framework." - "Analysis of foundational implications for quantum mechanics." - "Exploration of implications for quantum computation and quantum information processing." initial_scope_in_summary: - "Development of a new theoretical framework for 'Information states' in quantum mechanics." - "Exploration of foundational aspects and impact on understanding quantum mechanics." - "Investigation of implications for quantum computation and quantum information processing." initial_scope_out_summary: [] key_concepts_identified: - "Quantum information systems" - "Quantum mechanics" - "Information states" - "Theoretical framework development" - "Foundational aspects of quantum theory" - "Quantum computation" - "Quantum information processing" confirmed_connections: [] confirmed_expansions: - "Implications for quantum computation or quantum information processing." known_unknowns: [] parking_lot_ideas: [] exploration_log: - actor: "User" content: "Quantum information systems: a theory of quantum mechanics and Information states." - actor: "AI" content: "Initial summary: Interest in developing/exploring a theoretical framework integrating quantum mechanics with 'Information states' within quantum information systems. Proposed expansions: Foundational quantum concepts, Information theory in quantum systems, Quantum Computing & Communication, Thermodynamics of Information, Philosophical Implications. Questions: 1. Develop new theoretical framework for 'Information states' & QM? 2. Primarily interested in foundational aspects? 3. Explore implications for quantum computation/info processing?" - actor: "User" content: "yes" # Interpreted as yes to all three questions - actor: "AI" content: "Updated summary: Core idea is new theoretical framework for 'Information states' & QM. Primary focus on foundational aspects. Key expansion is implications for quantum computation/info processing. Questions: 1. Updated summary accurate? 2. Idea clear enough for initiation?" - actor: "User" content: "yes" # Interpreted as yes to both questions charter: version: '1.0' status: Formalized vision_statement: Develop a deeper, more unified, and fundamentally grounded understanding of reality based on the role of information, potentially bridging insights from physics, computation, and philosophy. core_problem_motivation: Addresses persistent explanatory gaps and limitations in current scientific paradigms (GR/QM incompatibility, measurement problem, nature of information, emergence, cosmological anomalies) and seeks a more coherent foundation, learning from failures of prior attempts (IO, LCRF). The core problem is understanding if and how information acts as a fundamental substrate governing physical dynamics. background_context: Built upon initial exploration of 'Information states' in quantum mechanics (exp_session_qis_001) and evolved through analysis of frameworks like Infomatics, PBRF, and lessons learned from IO/LCRF/CEE/FCE projects. high_level_goals: - Critically evaluate the role of information in fundamental physics. - Develop and rigorously test candidate theoretical frameworks grounded in information principles (currently focusing on PBRF approach). - Explore the relationship between information, quantum mechanics, spacetime, and emergence. - Identify key unresolved questions and potential experimental/theoretical avenues. specific_objectives: - Successfully execute the layered development methodology (PBRF OMF v2.0). - Validate Layer 1 conceptual framework according to defined success criteria. - Assess readiness for Layer 2 formalism search. - (Future) Develop and validate Layer 2/3 models. - (Ultimate) Produce a validated framework significantly advancing understanding of information's role in fundamental reality. scope_in: - Foundational principles of information dynamics. - Emergence of spacetime, particles, forces, complexity. - Relationship to quantum mechanics (EQR framework context). - Evaluation of candidate formalisms (initially PBRF L0/L1). - Logical consistency and internal validation. - Addressing known paradoxes/anomalies conceptually. scope_out: - Specific engineering applications of derived principles (initially). - Detailed quantitative predictions (until L2/L3 validated). - Integration with specific biological/cognitive models beyond foundational concepts (initially). - Exhaustive exploration of all possible alternative frameworks simultaneously (focus is sequential via OMF). key_deliverables: - Validated Layer 1 conceptual framework document (PBRF context). - Layer 1 URFE response document (PBRF context). - Decision documentation for Layer 2 readiness. - (Future) Defined Layer 2 formalism, Layer 3 simulation results, final validated framework. key_assumptions: - Information plays a fundamental, potentially primary, role in reality. - A consistent, principle-based description of reality is possible. - The chosen layered methodology (PBRF OMF v2.0) is effective for navigating this complex problem space. - User/AI collaboration can effectively drive theoretical development. key_constraints: - Adherence to the principle-first derivation approach (avoiding premature standard formalism). - Limitations of User/AI collaborative reasoning. - Computational resource limits for potential future simulations (L3). - Need for clear, objective validation criteria at each layer (per PBRF Success Criteria). initial_risk_assessment: - Conceptual Inconsistency: Chosen principles (PBRF L0) prove contradictory or insufficient. (Mitigation: Rigorous L0/L1 consistency checks). - Formalism Failure: Inability to find/develop a suitable L2 formalism embodying L0/L1 principles. (Mitigation: Strict Fail-Fast/Pivot rule). - Validation Intractability: Inability to computationally or analytically validate L2/L3 models. (Mitigation: Early feasibility checks, focus on qualitative validation initially). - Stagnation: Repeating failure modes of previous projects. (Mitigation: Explicit use of lessons learned, strict OMF adherence). success_criteria_summary: Successful validation of each development layer according to pre-defined criteria (Ref: [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0214_PBRF_Success_Criteria]]), enabling progress to the next layer. Ultimate success is a validated framework offering significant explanatory advantages and novel insights into information's role in reality. plan: version: '1.1' status: Formalized wbs: - id: '0.0' description: 'Phase 0: Foundational Synthesis & Knowledge Consolidation' parent_id: null dependencies: [] definition_of_done: All Phase 0 deliverables (Synthesis Doc, Refined Goals, Parking Lot, Charter v1.1) generated and approved by User. Readiness for subsequent phase planning confirmed. status: Not Started is_milestone: true # Completion of this phase is a major milestone produces_human_deliverable: true # Multiple documents require review/approval - id: '0.1' description: 'Systematic Review: AI processes all provided historical project files.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: [] definition_of_done: AI confirms processing of all relevant input files identified by user or context. Internal knowledge base updated. status: Completed is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false # Internal AI task estimated_effort: High # Requires significant processing - id: '0.2' description: 'Knowledge Extraction: AI extracts key definitions, concepts, principles, mechanisms, methodologies, results, failures, lessons learned.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.1'] definition_of_done: Structured data or internal representation of extracted knowledge created. status: Completed is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false # Internal AI task - id: '0.3' description: 'Identify Core Threads & Challenges: AI analyzes extracted knowledge for recurring themes, convergences, persistent challenges, unresolved questions.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.2'] definition_of_done: Internal analysis complete, key threads/challenges identified. status: Completed is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false # Internal AI task - id: '0.4' description: 'Synthesize Baseline Document: AI generates FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.3'] definition_of_done: Draft synthesis document generated. status: Completed is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true # Document for review specialized_process_template: GENERATE-SynthesisReport - id: '0.5' description: 'Refine Core Problem/Goals: AI proposes refined problem/goals in FID_Refined_Problem_Goals_v1.0.md.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.4'] definition_of_done: Draft refined goals document generated. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true # Document for review - id: '0.6' description: 'Update Parking Lot: AI generates FID_ParkingLot_v1.0.md consolidating unresolved issues.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.3'] # Can run parallel to 0.4/0.5 definition_of_done: Draft parking lot document generated. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true # Document for review - id: '0.7' description: 'Revise Charter: AI proposes FID_Charter_v1.1.md incorporating refined goals.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.5'] definition_of_done: Draft revised charter generated. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: true # Document for review - id: '0.8' description: 'Phase 0 Review & Approval: User reviews deliverables (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) and approves Phase 0 completion.' parent_id: '0.0' dependencies: ['0.4', '0.5', '0.6', '0.7'] definition_of_done: User explicitly approves all Phase 0 deliverables and confirms readiness to plan next phase. Decision logged. status: Not Started is_milestone: true # Final gate for Phase 0 produces_human_deliverable: false # User action required - id: '1.0' description: 'Phase 1: L1 Concept Development (Placeholder)' parent_id: null dependencies: ['0.8'] definition_of_done: TBD based on Phase 0 outcomes. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false - id: '2.0' description: 'Phase 2: L2 Formalism Search/Development (Placeholder)' parent_id: null dependencies: ['1.0'] # Assuming sequential phases definition_of_done: TBD based on Phase 1 outcomes. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false - id: '3.0' description: 'Phase 3: L3 Modeling & Validation (Placeholder)' parent_id: null dependencies: ['2.0'] # Assuming sequential phases definition_of_done: TBD based on Phase 2 outcomes. status: Not Started is_milestone: false produces_human_deliverable: false task_sequencing_notes: Phase 0 must be completed before planning subsequent phases. Tasks within Phase 0 have dependencies as listed (e.g., synthesis depends on extraction). resource_plan_notes: Primary resource is User-AI collaboration. Phase 0 requires significant AI processing time for review and synthesis of historical data. Access to all relevant historical files is critical. quality_plan_notes: Quality ensured by structured knowledge extraction, comprehensive synthesis, AI self-critique of generated documents, and mandatory User review/approval of all Phase 0 deliverables. Adherence to FID_StyleGuide, FID_Glossary. risk_register: - id: R01 description: Incomplete processing or inaccurate synthesis of historical data by AI during Phase 0. likelihood: Medium impact: High response_strategy: User oversight; Iterative refinement of synthesis document (Task 0.4); Cross-checking key findings against source files. status: Open - id: R02 description: Phase 0 synthesis reveals fundamental inconsistencies or roadblocks invalidating the core FID premise. likelihood: Low # Assuming prior work had some merit impact: Critical response_strategy: Rigorous analysis during Task 0.3/0.4; If confirmed, trigger OMF Fail-Fast/Halt decision at Milestone 0.8. status: Open change_management_process: Significant changes to scope, goals, or methodology require explicit user approval and documentation update (e.g., Charter/Plan revision). Decisions made during sprints (pivots, refinements) logged in Process Log. Phase 0 deliverables require explicit User approval (Task 0.8). methodology_specific_planning: Phase 0 is a preparatory phase focused on knowledge consolidation. Subsequent phases will adhere to PBRF OMF v2.0 [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0213_PBRF_OMF_v2.0]]. internal_review_summary: AI performed internal critique of the revised Phase 0 plan. Confirmed alignment with user directive and OMF principles. Added detail on task dependencies and deliverables. No critical issues identified. flagged_critical_issues: [] execution: tasks: - task_execution_id: FID_exec_0.1_001 task_id_from_plan: '0.1' status: Completed inputs_used: # List of all provided .md file names proposed_approach: Systematic re-processing and analysis of all provided files. execution_log: Internal processing and knowledge base update from historical files completed. output_data: type: internal_knowledge_update content_inline: Internal processing and knowledge base update from historical files completed. internal_critique_summary: Ensured all files considered. Checked for consistent interpretation. Flagged ambiguities for later synthesis. quality_check_status: AI Self-Checked provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: 03-EXECUTE-Task source_inputs: # List of all provided .md file names methodology_summary: Systematic review and internal processing of all provided historical project documents to build a comprehensive knowledge base for synthesis. - task_execution_id: FID_exec_0.2_001 task_id_from_plan: '0.2' status: Completed inputs_used: - Internal knowledge base from Task 0.1 proposed_approach: Explicit extraction and structuring of key information categories. execution_log: Internal structured extraction of key elements from historical projects completed. output_data: type: internal_knowledge_extraction content_inline: Internal structured extraction of key elements from historical projects completed. internal_critique_summary: Ensured comprehensive coverage and accurate categorization. Refined categories and linked related extractions. quality_check_status: AI Self-Checked provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: 03-EXECUTE-Task source_inputs: - type: project_state_data reference: execution.tasks.FID_exec_0.1_001.output_data methodology_summary: Structured extraction and categorization of definitions, concepts, principles, mechanisms, methodologies, results, failures, and lessons learned from the processed historical documents. - task_execution_id: FID_exec_0.3_001 task_id_from_plan: '0.3' status: Completed inputs_used: - Structured internal knowledge from Task 0.2 proposed_approach: Analytical processing to identify patterns and themes. execution_log: Internal analysis of extracted knowledge for core themes, convergences, challenges, and unresolved questions completed. output_data: type: internal_analysis_summary content_inline: Internal analysis of extracted knowledge for core themes, convergences, challenges, and unresolved questions completed. internal_critique_summary: Ensured balanced analysis, distinguished genuine convergence, prioritized challenges. quality_check_status: AI Self-Checked provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: 03-EXECUTE-Task source_inputs: - type: project_state_data reference: execution.tasks.FID_exec_0.2_001.output_data methodology_summary: Analytical processing of extracted knowledge to identify recurring themes, points of convergence, persistent challenges, and key unresolved questions across historical projects. - task_execution_id: FID_exec_0.4_001 task_id_from_plan: '0.4' status: Completed # User approved inputs_used: - Outputs of Tasks 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 proposed_approach: Generation of a comprehensive synthesis report. execution_log: Generated FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md (Expanded, Multi-Part). specialized_process_used: GENERATE-SynthesisReport output_data: type: synthesis_report_document format: markdown content_reference: FID_Historical_Synthesis_v1.0.md content_inline: # Full text of the multi-part synthesis report internal_critique_summary: Ensured balance, accuracy, coherence, and addressed all specified parts. quality_check_status: User Reviewed # Changed from AI Self-Checked provenance_data: generated_by_process_ref: 03-EXECUTE-Task source_inputs: - type: project_state_data reference: execution.tasks.FID_exec_0.1_001.output_data - type: project_state_data reference: execution.tasks.FID_exec_0.2_001.output_data - type: project_state_data reference: execution.tasks.FID_exec_0.3_001.output_data methodology_summary: Generation of a comprehensive synthesis report detailing the history, concepts, successes, failures, lessons learned, and unresolved challenges from prior related research projects, forming the baseline for the FID project. monitoring_control: issue_log: [] risk_register_updates: [] process_reviews: [] logs: decisions: - decision_id: FID_dec_001 decision_made: "Adopt PBRF OMF v2.0 as primary methodology for FID." rationale: "Incorporates lessons learned, emphasizes layered validation and fail-fast." decision_maker: User & AI status: Logged related_process_ref: 01-INITIATE-Project - decision_id: FID_dec_002 decision_made: "Prioritize Phase 0: Foundational Synthesis & Knowledge Consolidation before new theoretical development." rationale: "User concern about repeating past errors and need for a comprehensive baseline from extensive prior work." decision_maker: User & AI status: Logged related_process_ref: 02-PLAN-ProjectExecution insights: - insight_id: FID_ins_001 description: "The volume and diversity of prior work are substantial. A structured approach to synthesis (Task 0.4) will be critical." source_process_ref: Task 0.1 relevance: Phase 0 Planning - insight_id: FID_ins_002 description: "The evolution of concepts (e.g., 'information', 'resolution') across different project phases is notable. Tracking this evolution will be important for the synthesis." source_process_ref: Task 0.2 relevance: Synthesis Report Content - insight_id: FID_ins_003 description: "A major persistent challenge across all frameworks has been the rigorous derivation of stable, diverse emergent structures (particle analogues) from any proposed fundamental dynamics." source_process_ref: Task 0.3 relevance: Core FID Challenge Definition - insight_id: FID_ins_004 description: "The EQR framework appears as a strong point of conceptual convergence for describing the measurement/manifestation process." source_process_ref: Task 0.3 relevance: FID Theoretical Direction feedback_items: [] analysis_results: critiques: [] data_analyses: [] literature_reviews: [] logic_analyses: [] formalism_assessments: [] extracted_questions: [] knowledge_artifacts: style_guides: - id: FID_StyleGuide version: '1.0' status: Active content: tone_voice: Formal, objective, rigorous, precise, academic. Avoid overly speculative or informal language in core definitions and arguments. Maintain clarity for an interdisciplinary audience where possible, but prioritize technical accuracy. grammar_punctuation: Standard scientific English conventions. Consistency in terminology is crucial (referencing FID_Glossary). capitalization: Standard English rules. Key framework names (PBRF, EQR, FID, DCIN) capitalized. Layer designations (Layer 0, Layer 1) capitalized. Specific principles (P1-P7) capitalized. formatting: Use Markdown. Employ headings, lists (appropriately, per collab guidelines), bolding for emphasis/definitions, italics for foreign terms or occasional emphasis. Use code blocks for equations or pseudo-code where appropriate. Consistent file naming conventions (e.g., FID_Concept_Name_vX.Y.md). terminology_glossary_ref: FID_Glossary citations_references: Use consistent citation style (e.g., APA, Chicago - User to specify preference if needed, otherwise default to clear inline references like [[Node_ID]]). Maintain bibliography if external sources are used. figures_tables: Use clear labels, captions, and consistent formatting if figures/tables are generated. glossaries: - id: FID_Glossary version: '1.0' status: Active terms: - term: PBRF (Principle-Based Reality Framework) definition: The current methodological approach within the FID project, emphasizing layered development derived from foundational principles (P1-P7) and avoiding premature commitment to standard formalisms. Governed by PBRF OMF v2.0. status: Confirmed - term: EQR (Emergent Quantization from Resolution) definition: A conceptual framework (v1.0) describing quantum manifestation via interaction, stability-based basis selection, Born-rule probabilities, state updates, and information limits (j0). Serves as a target description for the observational interface in PBRF/FID. status: Confirmed - term: Information (Operational L1) definition: (PBRF L1) That which distinguishes one state, event, or pattern from another; the content of context-relative distinguishability. Derivative of distinguishable events governed by principles. (Ref: [[0217_PBRF_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_Info_Resolution_v1.2]]) status: Confirmed - term: Event (L1) definition: (PBRF L1) A fundamental, distinguishable occurrence marking a transition between distinct configurations (states) within the sequence characterising reality. Basic unit of change. (Ref: [[0217_PBRF_L1_Concepts_Dynamics_Info_Resolution_v1.2]]) status: Confirmed - term: Pattern (L1) definition: (PBRF L1) Any recognizable correlation, repetition, regularity, or organized configuration within the sequence of events or relations, distinguishable at some Resolution. Represents organized Information. (Ref: [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0218_PBRF_L1_Concepts_Structure_Stability_v1.2]]) status: Confirmed - term: Principle (L0) definition: (PBRF L0) A fundamental logical/conceptual postulate (P1-P7) assumed to constrain reality, forming the axiomatic basis of the PBRF framework. (Ref: [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0216_PBRF_Layer0_Axioms_v1.0]]) status: Confirmed - term: π (Pi) definition: (PBRF L0) The fundamental, dimensionless, abstract geometric principle governing cyclicity, phase, rotation, and periodicity within the informational substrate. (Ref: [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0216_PBRF_Layer0_Axioms_v1.0]]) status: Confirmed - term: φ (Phi / Golden Ratio) definition: (PBRF L0) The fundamental, dimensionless, abstract geometric principle governing scaling, proportion, recursion, and stability within the informational substrate. (Ref: [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0216_PBRF_Layer0_Axioms_v1.0]]) status: Confirmed success_metrics: - id: FID_Metrics version: '1.0' status: Active project_success_criteria: - goal_ref: "Overall FID Project Goal" # Placeholder metrics: - "Successful validation of the PBRF Layer 1 conceptual framework against its defined success criteria ([[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0214_PBRF_Success_Criteria]])." - "Successful identification and validation of a PBRF Layer 2 formalism capable of embodying L0/L1 principles and meeting L2 success criteria." - "(Long-term) Successful validation of PBRF Layer 3 models demonstrating required emergent phenomena and consistency with observation." - "(Ultimate) Production of a validated FID framework offering significant explanatory advantages over existing paradigms regarding information's role in reality." deliverable_acceptance_criteria: - deliverable_ref: "FID_Charter_v1.1" criteria: - "Approved by User, accurately reflects project scope and approach." - deliverable_ref: "PBRF Layer 1 Conceptual Framework Documents" criteria: - "Meets SC1.1-SC1.4 of [[archive/projects/PBRF 1/0214_PBRF_Success_Criteria]] (concepts defined from L0, mechanisms derived, internally consistent, sufficient URFE scope)." - deliverable_ref: "PBRF Layer 2 Formalism Definition Document" criteria: - "Meets SC2.1-SC2.4 (specific, justified embodiment of L0/L1, consistent, represents concepts)." - deliverable_ref: "PBRF Layer 3 Simulation Results/Validation Report" criteria: - "Meets SC3.1-SC3.5 (implemented, demonstrates target emergence, passes artifact checks, consistent with observation, yields novel prediction)." task_dod_summary: # General DoD, specific tasks will have more detailed DoDs in WBS - task_ref: "Generic Task" dod: "Task output generated and documented according to OMF. Internal AI self-critique performed (per Collab Guidelines). Output validated/approved by User or meets pre-defined automated checks. Project state updated correctly." collaboration_guidelines: - id: FID_CollabGuide version: '1.0' status: Active content: communication_style: User provides clear, explicit instructions and feedback. AI provides structured, justified responses, asks clarifying questions when needed, and clearly signals task completion or blockers. task_management_workflow: User initiates major project phases or milestone objectives. AI autonomously plans and executes the necessary sequence of tasks/sprints required to achieve the milestone, adhering strictly to the governing OMF and templates. AI reports progress, flags issues/blockers, and presents key deliverables or decisions for user validation/approval at appropriate checkpoints. User provides strategic direction and validates outcomes. feedback_revision: AI proactively performs self-critique (e.g., adopting a "Devil's Advocate" persona) on its own outputs *before* presenting milestone deliverables, identifying potential weaknesses, inconsistencies, or alternative interpretations. User provides specific feedback on presented deliverables. AI acknowledges user feedback, attempts to incorporate revisions, and confirms understanding before finalizing changes. handling_disagreements: AI proactively identifies and flags potential inconsistencies, limitations in its knowledge/capabilities, deviations from the OMF, or risks identified during self-critique. AI presents its rationale for issues. User reviews AI's assessment and makes the final decision, which is logged if significant. tool_platform_usage: Primary interaction occurs via this platform. Markdown is used for structured documentation and data exchange (like YAML). User is responsible for file management (saving outputs). availability_response: AI is available during active sessions. User manages session start/end times and overall project pacing. framework_states: [] # Initialize as empty, PBRF specific parameter_ledgers: [] # Initialize as empty, PBRF specific closure: {}