# Project Save State: Novel Scientific Predictions from Autaxys/Autology Principles (Full Plan) ## Project Title: Novel Scientific Predictions from Autaxys/Autology Principles ## Current Phase: Phase 5: Final Review & Compilation (Compiled Draft generated and Product QA complete) ## Current Status: Awaiting user `OK` to approve Compiled Draft and proceed to Phase 6: Project Completion & Learning Summary. --- ## Phase 1: Idea Formulation ### Initial 17 Ideas Provided by User: 1. Evolving Universal Laws (as a prediction of autaxys/autology). 2. The Infoton "Particle" (as a prediction of autaxys/autology). 3. Methodology for Investigating Novel Scientific Predictions from Autaxys/Autology. 4. Implications of Autaxys/Autology for Experimental Physics. 5. The Autaxic Table of Patterns (predicting a hierarchy of fundamental patterns beyond the Standard Model). 6. Spacetime Emergence Signatures (observable deviations from GR or novel spacetime phenomena due to autaxic spacetime). 7. Autaxic Explanation for Cosmological Dark Sector Phenomena (explaining dark matter/energy via autaxic dynamics). 8. Novel Interaction Modes/Forces (predicting new forces from autaxic relational processing). 9. Signatures of Primordial Autaxic Dynamics (relics from early universe autaxic processes). 10. Experimental Tests of Emergent Probabilism in Quantum Mechanics. 11. Limits on Information Density or Processing Speed based on Autaxic Principles. 12. Novel Conservation Laws from Autaxic Distinguishability. 13. Observational Signatures of Autaxic Coherence at Cosmological Scales. 14. Predicted Sequences/Outcomes of Early Universe Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) Events. 15. "Stability Islands" for Novel Complex Autaxic Patterns (exotic matter/organization). 16. Search for Signatures of Highly Complex/Proto-Mental Autaxic Patterning in Cosmological Data. 17. Novel Mass Generation Mechanisms or Deviations from E=mc² in Extreme Autaxic Conditions. ### Newly Generated Ideas (4): 18. **Autaxic Granularity of Spacetime and Relational Limits.** 19. **Cosmological Evolution of Interaction Strengths Driven by Autaxic Parsimony & Complexity.** 20. **Forbidden States/Transitions as Tests of Autaxic Intrinsic Coherence.** 21. **Signatures of Autaxic Resonance in Large-Scale Structure (LSS) Formation.** ### Final Approved Themes (5 Themes, 21 Ideas Total): *(Artifact: Expanded Ideas & Themes. Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* 1. **Theme 1: Autaxic Cosmology & Early Universe Dynamics.** * *Description:* Novel predictions concerning the universe's origin, evolution, large-scale structure, and observable cosmological signatures, derived from autaxic principles. Includes re-evaluation of dark sector phenomena and primordial processes. * *Mapped Ideas (with Impact/Testability):* * 1. Evolving Universal Laws (H, LT/C) * 7. Autaxic Explanation for Cosmological Dark Sector Phenomena (H, MT) * 9. Signatures of Primordial Autaxic Dynamics (H, LT/C) * 13. Observational Signatures of Autaxic Coherence at Cosmological Scales (M, NT) * 14. Predicted Sequences/Outcomes of Early Universe Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) Events (M, MT) * 19. (New) Cosmological Evolution of Interaction Strengths Driven by Autaxic Parsimony & Complexity (H, MT) * 21. (New) Signatures of Autaxic Resonance in Large-Scale Structure (LSS) Formation (M, MT) 2. **Theme 2: Autaxic Foundations of Physical Laws & Interactions.** * *Description:* Predictions regarding the emergent nature of fundamental physical laws, interactions, spacetime (including its potential granularity, possibly related to Planck length scales), quantum phenomena, conservation principles, and mass-energy relationships, as manifestations of autaxys. * *Mapped Ideas (with Impact/Testability):* * 6. Spacetime Emergence Signatures (H, MT) * 8. Novel Interaction Modes/Forces (H, MT) * 10. Experimental Tests of Emergent Probabilism in Quantum Mechanics (M, MT) * 11. Limits on Information Density or Processing Speed based on Autaxic Principles (M, LT/C) * 12. Novel Conservation Laws from Autaxic Distinguishability (M, MT) * 17. Novel Mass Generation Mechanisms or Deviations from E=mc² in Extreme Autaxic Conditions (H, LT/C) * 18. (New) Autaxic Granularity of Spacetime and Relational Limits (H, LT/C) *(User Note: Related to Planck length)* * 20. (New) Forbidden States/Transitions as Tests of Autaxic Intrinsic Coherence (M-H, MT) 3. **Theme 3: Novel Autaxic Patterns: Particles, Structures & Organization.** * *Description:* Predictions of new fundamental entities (e.g., Infoton), hierarchical structures (e.g., Autaxic Table of Patterns), and novel organizational states of matter/energy derived from autaxic principles. * *Mapped Ideas (with Impact/Testability):* * 2. The Infoton "Particle" (H, MT) * 5. The Autaxic Table of Patterns (H, LT/C) * 15. "Stability Islands" for Novel Complex Autaxic Patterns (M, LT/C) 4. **Theme 4: Autaxic Implications for Scientific Methodology & Experimentation.** * *Description:* The impact of autaxys/autology on scientific methodology, including strategies for investigating its novel predictions and guiding the design and interpretation of physical experiments. * *Mapped Ideas (with Impact/Testability):* * 3. Methodology for Investigating Novel Scientific Predictions from Autaxys/Autology (M, LT/C) * 4. Implications of Autaxys/Autology for Experimental Physics (M, NT) 5. **Theme 5: Advanced & Speculative Autaxic Manifestations.** * *Description:* Exploratory predictions concerning highly complex, potentially far-future, or deeply speculative emergent phenomena from autaxys, such as advanced organizational states or proto-mental patterning. * *Mapped Ideas (with Impact/Testability):* * 16. Search for Signatures of Highly Complex/Proto-Mental Autaxic Patterning in Cosmological Data (H, LT/C) --- ## Phase 2: Product Definition * **Product Type:** Conceptual Framework Document for Further Theoretical Development. * **Audience (Refined):** Niche theoretical physicists in advanced fields (e.g., string theory, SSB, foundational cosmology) whose work shows conceptual proximity to autaxic principles, aiming to demonstrate mutual benefit and how autaxys can connect and extend their theories. ### Approved Outline: *(Artifact: Proposed Outline. Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* * **Preamble/Abstract:** * Brief overview of autaxys as a foundational generative principle. * Purpose: To present novel scientific predictions derived from autaxys/autology, highlighting their potential to address current impasses and offer new perspectives for advanced theoretical physics (e.g., string theory, SSB, foundational cosmology). * Statement on the theoretical and desk-based nature of the current research. * **Section 1: Introduction: The Autaxic Proposition for Foundational Physics** * 1.1. The Contemporary Landscape: Shared Challenges and Unexplored Synergies in Foundational Theoretical Physics. * 1.2. Autaxys: A Principle of Intrinsic Self-Generation and Patterned Order. * 1.3. The Autaxic Generative Engine: An Overview of Core Dynamics and Meta-Logical Principles. * 1.4. Document Aims: Connecting Autaxic Predictions to Key Questions in Advanced Physics. * **Section 2: Theme 1 - Autaxic Cosmology & Early Universe Dynamics: Novel Predictions** * (Covering Ideas 1, 7, 9, 13, 14, 19, 21 with Statement, Derivation, Implications for each) * **Section 3: Theme 2 - Autaxic Foundations of Physical Laws & Interactions: Novel Predictions** * (Covering Ideas 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 20 with Statement, Derivation, Implications for each) * **Section 4: Theme 3 - Novel Autaxic Patterns: Particles, Structures & Organization: Novel Predictions** * (Covering Ideas 2, 5, 15 with Statement, Derivation, Implications for each) * **Section 5: Theme 4 - Autaxic Implications for Scientific Methodology & Experimentation: Framework Considerations** * (Covering Ideas 3, 4 with Approach/Principles) * **Section 6: Theme 5 - Advanced & Speculative Autaxic Manifestations: Exploratory Predictions** * (Covering Idea 16 with Statement, Derivation, Nature) * **Section 7: Synthesis & Synergies: Autaxys as a Unifying Framework for Foundational Physics** * 7.1. Connecting Autaxic Principles to Advanced Physics Concepts. * 7.2. Identifying Complementarities: How Autaxys Can Extend or Re-Ground Existing Theoretical Pursuits. * 7.3. The Path Forward: A Call for Collaborative Theoretical Exploration and Model Building. * **Appendices (Optional):** * A. Glossary of Key Autaxic Terms. * B. Summary Table of All 21 Predictions. --- ## Phase 3: Planning ### Approved Task List: *(Artifact: Task List. Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* 1. **Task 1: Draft Preamble and Abstract.** 2. **Task 2: Draft Section 1: Introduction: The Autaxic Proposition for Foundational Physics.** 3. **Task 3: Draft Section 2: Theme 1 - Autaxic Cosmology & Early Universe Dynamics: Novel Predictions.** 4. **Task 4: Draft Section 3: Theme 2 - Autaxic Foundations of Physical Laws & Interactions: Novel Predictions.** 5. **Task 5: Draft Section 4: Theme 3 - Novel Autaxic Patterns: Particles, Structures & Organization: Novel Predictions.** 6. **Task 6: Draft Section 5: Theme 4 - Autaxic Implications for Scientific Methodology & Experimentation: Framework Considerations.** 7. **Task 7: Draft Section 6: Theme 5 - Advanced & Speculative Autaxic Manifestations: Exploratory Predictions.** 8. **Task 8: Draft Section 7: Synthesis & Synergies: Autaxys as a Unifying Framework for Foundational Physics.** 9. **Task 9: Draft Appendices (Optional).** ### Summary of Internal Check & Question for Phase 3: Task list deemed actionable, clear, sufficient, and logically sequenced. Core product value resides in Tasks 1-8. Task 9 (Appendices) considered "good-to-have." No major external factors or resource needs identified as blockers for AI execution of drafting tasks. --- ## Phase 4: Task Execution (Drafts) *(Note: The full text of each draft is provided below. These were generated and approved sequentially.)* ### Task 1: Preamble and Abstract Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **Preamble** This document outlines a conceptual framework for novel scientific predictions derived from **autaxys**, a proposed foundational principle of intrinsic self-ordering, self-arranging, and self-generating patterned existence. Autaxys posits that reality operates via an inherent “generative engine,” comprising core operational dynamics and intrinsic meta-logical principles, which synergistically drive the emergence of all discernible phenomena—including matter, energy, spacetime, and physical laws—as complex patterns, without recourse to external agents or pre-imposed rules. The research presented herein is theoretical and desk-based, aiming to stimulate further conceptual development and dialogue within the foundational physics community. **Abstract** Current paradigms in foundational theoretical physics, while empirically successful within their domains, face persistent conceptual challenges and explanatory gaps, particularly concerning ultimate origins, the nature of physical laws, and the unification of disparate phenomena. This conceptual framework document introduces a series of novel scientific predictions derived from **autaxys** and its systematic study, **autology**. These predictions span cosmology, fundamental interactions, novel particle/pattern formation, and the very nature of physical law, offering new perspectives on issues central to advanced theoretical physics (e.g., string theory, spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), quantum gravity, foundational cosmology). By positing autaxys as a more fundamental generative layer, this work aims to demonstrate how its principles can: (a) offer resolutions to existing paradoxes, (b) provide a more coherent ontological grounding for observed phenomena, and (c) identify potential synergies and complementarities with ongoing research in advanced theoretical fields. The objective is to present a compelling case for autaxys as a unifying principle and to foster collaborative exploration into its implications for a deeper understanding of the universe. ### Task 2: Section 1 Introduction Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **1. Introduction: The Autaxic Proposition for Foundational Physics** **1.1. The Contemporary Landscape: Shared Challenges and Unexplored Synergies in Foundational Theoretical Physics** The ongoing pursuit of a fundamental understanding of our universe has led to remarkable theoretical structures, including string theory, advancements in spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) mechanisms, explorations in quantum gravity, and sophisticated cosmological models. These frameworks have provided profound insights and predictive power within their respective domains. However, the foundational landscape is also characterized by persistent conceptual challenges: the reconciliation of gravity with quantum mechanics, the nature of dark matter and dark energy, the hierarchy problem, the origin of fundamental constants, and the precise mechanisms underlying cosmic inflation or alternatives. Often, progress within one domain reveals or creates tensions with others, and the path towards a truly unified picture remains elusive. This context of shared grand challenges also presents an opportunity for exploring novel foundational principles that might offer new perspectives, resolve existing paradoxes, or illuminate unexplored synergies between seemingly disparate theoretical avenues. The autaxic framework is proposed in this spirit—as a candidate generative principle that may underpin and connect these advanced areas of inquiry. **1.2. Autaxys: A Principle of Intrinsic Self-Generation and Patterned Order** At the core of this work is **autaxys**, defined as the fundamental principle of reality conceived as a self-ordering, self-arranging, and self-generating system. It is the inherent dynamic process by which patterns emerge, persist, and interact, giving rise to all discernible structures and phenomena, including what are perceived as matter, energy, spacetime, and physical laws. Key characteristics of autaxys relevant to foundational physics include: * **Ontological Primacy:** Autaxys is posited as the ultimate ground from which physical reality emerges, rather than being a property of pre-existing substances. * **Dynamic and Processual Nature:** Reality is understood as an ongoing process of autaxic unfolding and pattern generation. * **Intrinsic Rationality (“Meta-Logic”):** Autaxys operates according to inherent principles of coherence, providing a basis for the observed lawfulness of the universe. * **Pattern-Generating Capacity:** Its primary manifestation is the generation of discernible regularities and structures at all scales. * **Acausal Origin of Ordering Principles:** The rules governing autaxys are intrinsic, not externally imposed. This perspective shifts the ontological basis from static entities to dynamic, generative processes, proposing that the "elements" of reality are fundamentally patterns of autaxic activity. **1.3. The Autaxic Generative Engine: An Overview of Core Dynamics and Meta-Logical Principles** Autaxys functions via an intrinsic “generative engine,” a synergistic set of core operational dynamics and guiding meta-logical principles. These are not laws in the conventional sense but describe the inherent modus operandi of autaxys itself. * **Core Operational Dynamics** include: Relational Processing (Dynamic I), Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II), Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III), Resonance and Coherence Establishment (Dynamic IV), Critical State Transitions (Dynamic V). * **Intrinsic Meta-Logical Principles** include: Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I), Conservation of Distinguishability (Meta-Logic II), Parsimony in Generative Mechanisms (Meta-Logic III), Intrinsic Determinacy and Emergent Probabilism (Meta-Logic IV), Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V). This engine provides the framework from which the specific predictions detailed in this document are derived, suggesting that physical laws and phenomena are emergent expressions of these deeper autaxic operations. **1.4. Document Aims: Connecting Autaxic Predictions to Key Questions in Advanced Physics** This conceptual framework document aims to: 1. Present a series of novel scientific predictions derived from the principles of autaxys and its generative engine. 2. Articulate the autaxic derivations for these predictions, connecting them to the core dynamics and meta-logic. 3. Explore the potential implications of these predictions for addressing key questions, paradoxes, and research frontiers within advanced theoretical physics. 4. Highlight potential synergies and complementarities between the autaxic framework and existing theoretical pursuits. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate the potential of autaxys as a unifying and generative principle. ### Task 3: Section 2 Theme 1 Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **2. Theme 1: Autaxic Cosmology & Early Universe Dynamics: Novel Predictions** This section details novel predictions concerning the universe's origin, evolution, large-scale structure, and observable cosmological signatures, as derived from the foundational principles of autaxys. These predictions offer alternative perspectives on established cosmological models and aim to address phenomena currently attributed to the "dark sector" or requiring ad-hoc inflationary mechanisms. **2.1. Prediction: Evolving Universal Laws (Idea 1)** * **2.1.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Universal physical laws are not eternally fixed constants but are emergent meta-patterns of autaxic activity. As such, they may have undergone a period of formation, selection, and stabilization, particularly during the primordial, highly energetic epochs of the universe. Their current form represents a stable, self-consistent operational regime of autaxys. * *Autaxic Derivation:* This prediction stems from autaxys as a dynamic, generative system (Section 1.2). The **Principle of Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V)** suggests autaxys explores various relational configurations, with **Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III)** and **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** stabilizing those meta-patterns (laws) that lead to coherent and generatively fruitful outcomes. Early **Critical State Transitions (Dynamic V)** in the universe's autaxic unfolding could have represented shifts in dominant operational rules until a stable set emerged. This aligns with the autaxic reinterpretation of laws in *A New Way of Seeing* (Ch. 10). * **2.1.2. Implications for Cosmological Models, Inflation, Early Universe Phenomenology:** * Challenges the standard assumption of immutable laws applied retrospectively to t=0. * May offer alternative explanations for phenomena typically addressed by cosmic inflation (e.g., horizon, flatness problems) if early-epoch relational dynamics (laws) permitted different propagation of influence or geometric evolution. * Could impact interpretations of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) or Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) formation if interaction parameters were different in those eras. Observational searches for variations in fundamental "constants" at high redshifts gain deeper theoretical motivation. **2.2. Prediction: Autaxic Explanation for Cosmological Dark Sector Phenomena (Idea 7)** * **2.2.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Phenomena currently attributed to dark matter and dark energy do not necessitate new fundamental particles or an unexplained cosmological constant. Instead, they are proposed to arise from an incomplete understanding of large-scale autaxic spacetime dynamics and emergent gravity, or from the universe's intrinsic expansionary tendencies driven by autaxys. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Spacetime is an emergent relational structure derived from **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** among autaxic patterns (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 12). Gravity is the manifestation of this dynamic, structured relational matrix. The standard model of gravity (General Relativity) may be an effective theory that does not capture the full autaxic dynamics at galactic or cosmic scales. The **Principle of Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V)**, driving autaxys to generate richer relational networks, could manifest as an intrinsic expansionary pressure. * **2.2.2. Potential to Resolve Dark Matter/Energy Puzzles without New Particles/Fields:** * Offers a path to explain anomalous galactic rotation curves or cosmic acceleration via modifications to gravitational/inertial dynamics derived from autaxys, or as inherent properties of autaxic cosmic evolution, rather than invoking new, unobserved substances. * Aligns with critiques suggesting the "dark sector" may be an artifact of applying incomplete theories to cosmic scales. **2.3. Prediction: Signatures of Primordial Autaxic Dynamics (Idea 9)** * **2.3.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The very early universe, during the initial "autaxic ignition" phase where patterns and laws were first differentiating and stabilizing, may have left subtle, relic signatures in the cosmos, distinct from those predicted by standard inflationary models. * *Autaxic Derivation:* The transition from undifferentiated autaxys to patterned reality involved intense **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** and cascades of **Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II)** under conditions far from the equilibrium of current physical laws (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 14). This primordial phase of self-organization, before the full stabilization of current particle spectra and interaction rules, could generate unique, persistent large-scale correlations or anisotropies. * **2.3.2. Connections to CMB Anomalies, Primordial Fluctuations:** * May provide explanations for observed large-angle anomalies in the CMB or specific non-Gaussianities in primordial density fluctuations that are not easily accommodated by simple inflationary models. * Suggests that the seeds of cosmic structure might carry imprints of these fundamental autaxic ordering processes. **2.4. Prediction: Observational Signatures of Autaxic Coherence at Cosmological Scales (Idea 13)** * **2.4.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The **Principle of Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)**, a fundamental aspect of autaxys, implies that the universe as a whole autaxic system should exhibit a degree of global self-consistency. This might manifest as unexpected large-scale correlations, alignments, or preferred modes in the distribution of matter or radiation, beyond standard statistical expectations. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Meta-Logic I mandates that autaxys cannot sustain or generate true ontological contradictions. Applied to the cosmos, this suggests a tendency towards globally harmonized states, potentially facilitated by **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** operating over vast scales during the universe's formative epochs, leading to a more interconnected structure than assumed by purely local physics. * **2.4.2. Potential for Non-Standard Large-Scale Correlations:** * Motivates searches for subtle alignments in quasar polarizations, galaxy cluster orientations, or large-scale temperature patterns in the CMB that might defy standard cosmological principle assumptions of isotropy and homogeneity on the largest scales. * Such findings, if robust, could indicate underlying autaxic ordering principles at work. **2.5. Prediction: Predicted Sequences/Outcomes of Early Universe SSB Events (Idea 14)** * **2.5.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Autaxys, through its dynamic of **Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II)**, predicts specific sequences of symmetry breaking in the early universe. These cascades, driven by autaxys evolving from a state of maximal symmetry towards increasing differentiation, would determine the spectrum of fundamental particles and forces, potentially including sectors beyond the Standard Model. * *Autaxic Derivation:* The universe's particle content and force structure are seen as outcomes of autaxys breaking its primordial symmetries. The **Principle of Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)** and **Parsimony (Meta-Logic III)** would guide these SSB cascades towards stable, self-consistent, and minimally complex sets of rules and patterns. The Autaxic Table of Patterns (Theme 3) would be a direct consequence of these predicted SSB sequences. * **2.5.2. Implications for Particle Cosmology, Phase Transitions:** * Offers a framework for understanding *why* the Standard Model has its specific gauge groups and particle generations. * May predict novel phase transitions in the early universe, potentially leading to observable relics (e.g., topological defects, gravitational wave signatures) or new particle candidates. **2.6. Prediction: Cosmological Evolution of Interaction Strengths (New Idea 19)** * **2.6.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The effective strengths of fundamental interactions (coupling "constants") are not necessarily immutable but may exhibit subtle evolution over cosmic history. This evolution would be tied to changes in the universe's overall relational complexity and energy density, reflecting autaxys optimizing its generative rules. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Physical laws, including interaction strengths, are emergent meta-patterns of autaxys (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 10). The **Principle of Parsimony in Generative Mechanisms (Meta-Logic III)** suggests autaxys favors efficient generative rules, while the **Principle of Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V)** drives it towards richer expressions. As the universe expands and cools (i.e., its average autaxic activity density and relational structure evolve), the optimal parameters for these meta-patterns (interaction strengths) might shift subtly to maintain overall coherence and generative fecundity. * **2.6.2. Testable Deviations in Look-Back Studies:** * Provides a theoretical basis for searching for variations in constants like the fine-structure constant or gravitational constant through observations of distant quasars, BBN, or the CMB. * Positive detection would strongly support the autaxic view of laws as emergent and dynamic. **2.7. Prediction: Signatures of Autaxic Resonance in Large-Scale Structure (LSS) Formation (New Idea 21)** * **2.7.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** principle in autaxys, where patterns with compatible dynamic characteristics selectively amplify or couple, could influence the formation of large-scale structures. This might lead to preferred scales, alignments, or morphologies in the distribution of galaxies or galaxy clusters, beyond what is predicted by standard gravitational collapse models based solely on initial density fluctuations. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Dynamic IV suggests that during the gravitational assembly of LSS, certain configurations of matter (autaxic patterns) might achieve enhanced stability or preferential growth due to resonant coupling with underlying autaxic field dynamics or with each other over large scales. This is a collective, self-organizing effect intrinsic to autaxys. * **2.7.2. Non-Standard Morphologies or Preferred Scales in LSS:** * Motivates searches for unexpected periodicities, alignments, or characteristic shapes in the cosmic web (filaments, voids, cluster distributions) that cannot be easily explained by standard N-body simulations. * Could offer explanations for observed LSS anomalies or features that seem too organized for purely random initial conditions amplified by gravity. ### Task 4: Section 3 Theme 2 Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **3. Theme 2: Autaxic Foundations of Physical Laws & Interactions: Novel Predictions** This section presents predictions regarding the emergent nature of fundamental physical laws, interactions, spacetime, quantum phenomena, conservation principles, and mass-energy relationships, as manifestations of autaxys. These challenge conventional views by grounding these foundational aspects of physics in deeper, generative autaxic processes. **3.1. Prediction: Spacetime Emergence Signatures (Idea 6)** * **3.1.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Spacetime is not a fundamental, pre-existing entity but an emergent relational structure arising from autaxic processes. Observable signatures of this emergence may include subtle deviations from classical General Relativity (GR) predictions in extreme astrophysical or cosmological regimes, or novel phenomena related to spacetime's underlying discrete or processual nature. * *Autaxic Derivation:* This is derived from **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** being the basis for all structure, and **Critical State Transitions (Dynamic V)** leading to the emergence of spacetime as a large-scale coherent relational matrix, as detailed in *A New Way of Seeing* (Ch. 12). The properties of this emergent spacetime are shaped by autaxys’ **Meta-Logic**, particularly **Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)** ensuring a consistent relational fabric. * **3.1.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Motivates searches for phenomena like Lorentz invariance violation at extremely high energies, modified dispersion relations for energetic particles from distant astrophysical sources, or residual "spacetime foam" effects. * Offers new pathways to quantum gravity by treating spacetime as an emergent phenomenon arising from more fundamental autaxic dynamics, rather than attempting to quantize a classical field. **3.2. Prediction: Novel Interaction Modes/Forces (Idea 8)** * **3.2.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Beyond the four known fundamental forces, autaxys may permit the existence of novel, potentially very weak or context-dependent, interaction modes. These would arise directly from the fundamental **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** between different types or configurations of autaxic patterns. * *Autaxic Derivation:* If all interactions are forms of relational processing, the currently known forces represent stabilized, dominant modes of such processing. However, autaxys’ generative engine, particularly its capacity for diverse **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** and **Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II)** leading to varied pattern types, could allow for other, more subtle or specialized modes of relational exchange not yet cataloged or easily detectable. * **3.2.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could provide explanations for anomalies in particle physics experiments or cosmological observations that do not fit neatly within the Standard Model or General Relativity. * May lead to searches for new force carriers or unexpected couplings between known particles, or between known particles and components of an autaxically-explained "dark sector." **3.3. Prediction: Experimental Tests of Emergent Probabilism in Quantum Mechanics (Idea 10)** * **3.3.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is proposed to be an emergent feature arising from underlying, complex, but fundamentally deterministic autaxic processes, as per the **Principle of Intrinsic Determinacy and Emergent Probabilism (Meta-Logic IV)**. It may be possible, in principle, to devise experiments that probe for subtle deviations from standard quantum probabilities under highly specific conditions or reveal signatures indicative of this underlying determinism. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Meta-Logic IV posits that apparent quantum mechanical probabilism arises from the complex interplay of deterministic autaxic processes, especially during **Critical State Transitions (Dynamic V)** where multiple potential outcomes exist, or due to inherent limitations of any finite observer-pattern in grasping the totality of influences on a given event. The "measurement problem" is reframed as the process by which a specific outcome is actualized from a spectrum of autaxic potentialities. * **3.3.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Challenges deeply entrenched interpretations of quantum mechanics (e.g., Copenhagen, Many-Worlds) by offering a deterministic underpinning. * Could motivate long-term conceptual and experimental programs searching for minute deviations from Born rule predictions in highly controlled quantum systems, or for evidence of "hidden variables" that are, in fact, expressions of the underlying autaxic state. **3.4. Prediction: Limits on Information Density or Processing Speed (Idea 11)** * **3.4.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Autaxys, as a process-based reality where patterns are configurations of its activity, may impose fundamental limits on the density of distinguishable information (patterns) or the speed of relational processing (interaction propagation) within a given region of emergent spacetime. These limits would be more fundamental than, and potentially give rise to, those derived from current physics (e.g., Bekenstein bound, Planck time/length). * *Autaxic Derivation:* If spacetime emerges from **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** and patterns are configurations of autaxic activity, then the very fabric of reality possesses an intrinsic processing capacity. The **Principle of Conservation of Distinguishability (Meta-Logic II)** and the potentially discrete or finite nature of fundamental autaxic operations at any given scale might imply a maximum rate or density of pattern differentiation and interaction. * **3.4.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could have profound consequences for black hole thermodynamics, the ultimate limits of computation, and the information paradox. * May provide a deeper ontological origin for concepts like the holographic principle or the fundamental discreteness of spacetime. **3.5. Prediction: Novel Conservation Laws from Autaxic Distinguishability (Idea 12)** * **3.5.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The **Principle of Conservation of Distinguishability (Meta-Logic II)** in autaxys, which asserts the ontological inertia of stable patterns and their transformative potential, may give rise to novel conservation laws beyond those currently recognized in the Standard Model. These would correspond to conserved fundamental distinctions or relational properties inherent in autaxic patterns. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Meta-Logic II states that once a stable distinction or pattern emerges, its fundamental distinguishability or transformative potential is conserved through interactions. While known conservation laws (energy, momentum, charge) are seen as expressions of this principle, autaxys might generate other fundamental, conserved "qualities," "charges," or relational invariants associated with its deeper pattern structures or symmetries broken during **SSB (Dynamic II)**. * **3.5.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could lead to the prediction of new quantum numbers or conserved quantities, potentially explaining unexpected particle stability, decay patterns, or selection rules in exotic interactions. * This would expand our understanding of fundamental symmetries and the constraints governing physical processes. **3.6. Prediction: Novel Mass Generation Mechanisms or Deviations from E=mc² (Idea 17)** * **3.6.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Mass is an emergent property of stable autaxic process-patterns, reflecting their internal bound autaxic activity and relational coupling strength within the autaxic environment (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 13). Autaxys may allow for novel mass generation mechanisms beyond the Standard Model Higgs field, or predict subtle deviations from the E=mc² equivalence under extreme autaxic conditions (e.g., very high energy densities or during primordial autaxic state transitions). * *Autaxic Derivation:* Mass arises from the **Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III)** and **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** that stabilize patterns, and their coupling to the autaxic environment. The Higgs mechanism is one such emergent coupling. Autaxys, via different **SSB (Dynamic II)** pathways or direct **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** effects, could lead to other ways patterns acquire inertia. E=mc² describes the equivalence of bound autaxic activity (mass) and propagative activity (energy); extreme conditions might alter the parameters of this equivalence if the underlying autaxic structure is significantly perturbed or if different modes of autaxic activity become dominant. * **3.6.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could offer alternatives or additions to the Higgs mechanism, particularly for particles whose masses are not well explained by it (e.g., neutrino masses, potential dark matter candidates if not explained by modified gravity). * Deviations from E=mc², if ever observed, would be revolutionary, fundamentally impacting our understanding of energy-mass conversion in extreme astrophysical environments or the early universe. **3.7. Prediction: Autaxic Granularity of Spacetime and Relational Limits (New Idea 18)** *(User Note: Related to Planck length)* * **3.7.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Spacetime, as an emergent structure from discrete or processual autaxic **Relational Processing (Dynamic I)** events, is predicted to exhibit granularity or "jitter" at extremely small scales (potentially related to, or giving rise to, the Planck length scale), rather than being an infinitely smooth continuum. This implies fundamental limits to relational distinguishability and the divisibility of spacetime intervals. * *Autaxic Derivation:* If spacetime is a relational structure built from fundamental autaxic interactions/events (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 12), and these interactions possess a characteristic scale or processing time related to autaxys' fundamental operations, then spacetime itself cannot be infinitely divisible. This granularity is an intrinsic feature of its emergent nature from a process-based foundation, distinct from imposing quantization on a pre-existing continuum. * **3.7.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Directly impacts theories of quantum gravity by providing an ontological basis for spacetime discreteness. * Predicts potentially observable consequences such as modified dispersion relations for very high-energy photons/particles from distant astrophysical sources (a signature of energy-dependent spacetime "fuzziness"), a minimum resolvable length/time, or "spacetime foam" effects. * Could provide a physical basis for UV cutoffs required in some quantum field theories, grounding them in the fundamental structure of autaxic reality. **3.8. Prediction: Forbidden States/Transitions as Tests of Autaxic Intrinsic Coherence (New Idea 20)** * **3.8.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* The **Principle of Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)**, a cornerstone of autaxys, mandates that autaxys cannot generate or sustain patterns or processes that are fundamentally self-contradictory or ontologically inconsistent with its overall structure and other meta-logical principles. This implies the existence of specific particle states, decay channels, or interaction outcomes that, while perhaps allowed by superficial symmetries or known conservation laws alone, are "forbidden" by deeper autaxic coherence. * *Autaxic Derivation:* Meta-Logic I acts as a fundamental selection principle governing all autaxic manifestations. If a hypothetical process or state would lead to an irresolvable paradox within the autaxic system (e.g., violating the conditions for stable pattern emergence, contradicting the **Conservation of Distinguishability (Meta-Logic II)**, or creating systemic incoherence that cannot be resolved by **Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III)**), autaxys would inherently prevent its actualization or sustained existence. * **3.8.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Offers a novel experimental and theoretical approach: identifying and searching for the *absence* of theoretically plausible but autaxically forbidden phenomena. * Such "null results" in specific, carefully targeted searches could provide strong indirect evidence for autaxys and its coherence principle, constraining theory space beyond current known laws. This requires detailed theoretical work to identify such forbidden scenarios based on autaxic principles. ### Task 5: Section 4 Theme 3 Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **4. Theme 3: Novel Autaxic Patterns: Particles, Structures & Organization: Novel Predictions** This section focuses on predictions of new fundamental entities, hierarchical structures for organizing matter/energy, and novel organizational states, all derived from the generative principles of autaxys. These predictions suggest that the currently known roster of particles and organizational principles may be incomplete, with autaxys providing a framework for anticipating further layers of reality. **4.1. Prediction: The Infoton "Particle" (Idea 2) - An Autaxic Re-evaluation** * **4.1.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Autaxys, through specific resonance conditions and stability criteria inherent in its **Generative Engine (Section 1.3)**, may predict the existence of fundamental patterns with properties not encompassed by the Standard Model. The "Infoton" (Î₁), a light, charged scalar pattern predicted by precursor frameworks (e.g., Infomatics v3.3), is re-evaluated within autology. While its original derivation faced empirical challenges, autaxys provides a new lens to assess if such a pattern (or a modified version) could exist as a fundamental, stable mode of autaxic activity, perhaps with interaction modes that have eluded current detection methods. * *Autaxic Derivation:* The existence of specific, stable autaxic process-patterns is determined by achieving robust **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** and **Feedback (Dynamic III)** loops, governed by **Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)**. The original Infoton prediction arose from a specific "Ratio Resonance Stability Principle." Autology would re-derive or refute such specific pattern predictions based on its full generative engine, potentially leading to revised properties (e.g., interaction strength, precise nature of charge-analogue) that might explain its current non-observation if it exists. * **4.1.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * If a refined Infoton-like pattern is robustly predicted by autaxys with properties consistent with non-detection (e.g., extremely weak coupling, novel type of interaction), it would represent a concrete target for new experimental searches. * Serves as a test case for autology's ability to make specific entity predictions and to critically re-assess challenging predictions from its lineage. * Could offer candidates for certain types of dark matter if its properties align. **4.2. Prediction: The Autaxic Table of Patterns (Idea 5)** * **4.2.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Autaxys predicts that fundamental "particles" and potentially more complex stable patterns can be organized into a hierarchical system or "Table of Patterns," analogous to the periodic table of elements. This table would be based on underlying quantum numbers or generative principles derived from autaxys's core dynamics and meta-logic, reflecting different stable modes of autaxic organization. * *Autaxic Derivation:* The **Principle of Parsimony in Generative Mechanisms (Meta-Logic III)** suggests autaxys uses a minimal set of rules to generate diverse patterns. **Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II)** cascades would lead to families of related patterns. **Resonance (Dynamic IV)** and **Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)** would dictate which patterns are stable and how they relate. The "Autaxic Table" would map these stable configurations and their interrelations, potentially revealing underlying symmetries or generative sequences. * **4.2.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could provide a deeper understanding of the observed particle zoo (quarks, leptons, bosons) and predict new, yet undiscovered, fundamental patterns or families of patterns. * Offers an organizational principle beyond the Standard Model's group theory structure, potentially explaining fermion generations, mass hierarchies, or mixing angles from first autaxic principles. * May guide the search for physics beyond the Standard Model by predicting "gaps" or expected properties of missing patterns in the table. **4.3. Prediction: "Stability Islands" for Novel Complex Autaxic Patterns (Idea 15)** * **4.3.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Beyond fundamental particles, autaxys may generate "stability islands" for highly complex, self-sustaining patterns of matter/energy, representing novel forms of organization with exotic properties. These would be analogous to the predicted stability islands for superheavy atomic nuclei but arising from more fundamental autaxic organizational principles. * *Autaxic Derivation:* The **Principle of Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V)** drives autaxys to explore configurations of increasing complexity. While many complex configurations are unstable, specific combinations of **Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III)**, **Resonance (Dynamic IV)**, and **Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I)** could lead to highly stable, complex attractors in the autaxic state space. These would be self-contained, persistent patterns with unique emergent properties. * **4.3.2. Implications for Foundational Physics:** * Could predict the existence of exotic, stable forms of matter or energy configurations not currently conceived (e.g., complex topological solitons, coherent multi-particle states with unusual properties). * May offer candidates for certain types of dark matter if these patterns are massive and interact weakly. * Opens theoretical avenues for exploring the ultimate limits of complexity and stability in physical systems, guided by autaxic principles. ### Task 6: Section 5 Theme 4 Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **5. Theme 4: Autaxic Implications for Scientific Methodology & Experimentation: Framework Considerations** The autaxic framework, by proposing a fundamental shift in ontological perspective from static entities to generative processes, carries significant implications for scientific methodology and the long-term evolution of experimental inquiry. This section outlines key framework considerations for how autaxys and autology might reshape our approach to investigating foundational questions and interpreting empirical data. **5.1. Framework: Methodology for Investigating Novel Scientific Predictions from Autaxys/Autology (Idea 3)** * **5.1.1. Approach: Theoretical Modeling, Re-interpretation of Anomalies, Identifying Unique Signatures.** * *Theoretical Modeling:* A primary methodological thrust within autology involves developing formal mathematical and computational models of autaxys’s **Generative Engine (Section 1.3)**. This includes simulating how its core dynamics (Relational Processing, SSB, Feedback, Resonance, Critical State Transitions) and meta-logical principles (Intrinsic Coherence, Conservation of Distinguishability, etc.) lead to the emergence of specific patterns, laws, and cosmological scenarios. The aim is to derive quantitative predictions from these first principles. * *Re-interpretation of Anomalies:* Existing empirical anomalies (e.g., in cosmological data, particle physics results, or quantum measurement contexts) should be systematically re-examined through the autaxic lens. Autaxys may offer more parsimonious or generative explanations for such phenomena than those requiring ad-hoc additions to current models (e.g., new particles, fields, or modifications of GR). * *Identifying Unique Signatures:* Autology must focus on identifying unique, unambiguous observational or experimental signatures that would specifically favor autaxic explanations over conventional ones. This includes predicting phenomena that are *forbidden* or unexpected by current theories but are natural consequences of autaxys (e.g., Idea 20: Forbidden States/Transitions). * **5.1.2. Role of Conceptual Coherence and Generative Power in Theory Assessment.** * Autology advocates for an expanded set of criteria for theory assessment in foundational science. Beyond empirical adequacy and predictive success, greater weight should be given to: Conceptual Coherence, Generative Power, Ontological Parsimony. * This approach, detailed further in *Autology and the Evolution of Science* (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 15), suggests that theories like autaxys, which aim for deep generative explanation, should be evaluated on their potential to provide a more coherent and unified worldview. **5.2. Framework: Implications of Autaxys/Autology for Experimental Physics (Idea 4)** * **5.2.1. Guiding Principles for New Experimental Designs (Long-Term).** * These might focus on: Probing Pre-Spacetime Dynamics, Testing Relational Structures, Creating Extreme Autaxic Conditions, Searching for Autaxically Forbidden Phenomena. * **5.2.2. Re-interpreting Data from Existing and Future Experiments.** * Autaxys provides a new interpretive framework for data. Results that appear anomalous might find natural explanations as manifestations of underlying autaxic processes. The framework encourages considering that "noise" could sometimes contain signals of deeper autaxic dynamics. ### Task 7: Section 6 Theme 5 Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **6. Theme 5: Advanced & Speculative Autaxic Manifestations: Exploratory Predictions** This section ventures into more speculative territory, exploring the potential for autaxys to generate phenomena of extreme complexity, possibly including precursors or analogues to informational self-organization that might be termed "proto-mental." These predictions are, by nature, long-term and conceptual, representing the far frontiers of autological inquiry. **6.1. Prediction: Search for Signatures of Highly Complex/Proto-Mental Autaxic Patterning in Cosmological Data (Idea 16)** * **6.1.1. Statement & Autaxic Derivation:** * *Statement:* Given autaxys’s inherent drive towards **Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V)**, it is conceivable that under specific, rare conditions, the universe could generate autaxic patterns of such extraordinary organizational and informational complexity that they exhibit rudimentary forms of self-referential processing, environmental modeling, or coherent, goal-directed (in a system-survival sense) behavior. * *Autaxic Derivation:* This prediction is a speculative extension of **Meta-Logic V (Interactive Complexity Maximization)** and **Dynamic V (Critical State Transitions to Emergent Hierarchies)**. The nature of mind and consciousness, from an autaxic perspective, is seen as arising from such highly complex, informationally integrated, self-referential autaxic patterning (*A New Way of Seeing*, Ch. 16). * **6.1.2. Highly Speculative Nature & Potential Search Modalities (Conceptual):** * *Highly Speculative Nature:* Stressed that this is at the extreme edge of theoretical exploration. * *Potential Search Modalities (Conceptual & Long-Term):* Non-Random Cosmic Features, Anomalous Energy Signatures, Information-Theoretic Analysis of Cosmic Data. * Primary value is to push boundaries and encourage vigilance for inexplicable cosmic-scale anomalies. ### Task 8: Section 7 Synthesis & Synergies Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **7. Synthesis & Synergies: Autaxys as a Unifying Framework for Foundational Physics** This concluding section aims to synthesize these ideas, highlighting how autaxys can serve as a unifying framework that connects with, and potentially offers deeper grounding for, concepts within advanced theoretical physics. **7.1. Connecting Autaxic Principles to Advanced Physics Concepts** * **Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) and Particle Physics:** Autaxys incorporates SSB (Dynamic II) as a core mechanism, potentially explaining *why* certain symmetries exist and the sequence of breakings. * **String Theory and Extra Dimensions:** Autaxys (Relational Processing, emergent spacetime) offers a different perspective on fundamental patterns and dimensionality. * **Quantum Gravity and Spacetime Emergence:** Autaxys aligns with spacetime as emergent/discrete, offering a generative engine for a quantum-compatible spacetime. * **Cosmological Inflation and Alternatives:** Autaxys (Evolving Universal Laws, Primordial Dynamics) suggests alternatives for early universe puzzles. **7.2. Identifying Complementarities: How Autaxys Can Extend or Re-Ground Existing Theoretical Pursuits** * **Providing Ontological Grounding:** For theories lacking clear ontological interpretation. * **Explaining Free Parameters:** Autaxys aims to provide a framework for deriving/constraining parameters. * **Suggesting New Research Directions:** Novel predictions can stimulate new investigations. * **Unifying Disparate Concepts:** Autaxys as a singular generative principle offers pathways to unify laws, particles, spacetime, etc. **7.3. The Path Forward: A Call for Collaborative Theoretical Exploration and Model Building** * **Formal Modeling:** Translate qualitative principles into formal mathematical/computational models. * **Focused Investigations:** Specific predictions as focal points for research programs. * **Interdisciplinary Dialogue:** Engagement with physicists in related fields. * **Methodological Development:** Further develop methodology for investigating autaxic predictions. Autaxys invites a shift from seeking ultimate static constituents to understanding ultimate generative processes. ### Task 9: Appendices Draft *(Status: Product QA Complete, Approved)* **Appendix A: Glossary of Key Autaxic Terms** * **Autaxys:** The fundamental principle of reality conceived as a self-ordering, self-arranging, and self-generating system... (See Section 1.2) * **Autology:** The interdisciplinary field dedicated to the systematic study of autaxys... * **Generative Engine (of Autaxys):** The intrinsic modus operandi of autaxys, comprising core operational dynamics and inherent meta-logical principles... (See Section 1.3) * **Operational Dynamics (of Autaxys):** Relational Processing (Dynamic I), Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) (Dynamic II), Feedback Dynamics (Dynamic III), Resonance and Coherence Establishment (Dynamic IV), Critical State Transitions (Dynamic V). * **Meta-Logical Principles (of Autaxys):** Intrinsic Coherence (Meta-Logic I), Conservation of Distinguishability (Meta-Logic II), Parsimony in Generative Mechanisms (Meta-Logic III), Intrinsic Determinacy and Emergent Probabilism (Meta-Logic IV), Interactive Complexity Maximization (Meta-Logic V). * **Autaxic Pattern (Process-Pattern):** A discernible, persistent, and interactive configuration of autaxic activity... **Appendix B: Summary Table of All 21 Predictions** | ID | Prediction Statement (Core Essence) | Primary Autaxic Driver(s) / Theme Link | Section | |----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------| | 1 | Universal laws may have evolved in the early universe. | Dynamics (III, IV, V), Meta-Logic V; Theme 1 | 2.1 | | 7 | Dark sector phenomena explained by autaxic spacetime/gravity dynamics. | Dynamics (I), Meta-Logic V; Theme 1 | 2.2 | | 9 | Relic signatures from primordial autaxic dynamics. | Dynamics (I, II), Meta-Logic (various); Theme 1 | 2.3 | | 13 | Observable large-scale coherence from autaxic principles. | Meta-Logic I, Dynamic IV; Theme 1 | 2.4 | | 14 | Specific sequences/outcomes of early universe SSB events. | Dynamic II, Meta-Logic I, III; Theme 1 | 2.5 | | 19 | Cosmological evolution of interaction strengths. | Meta-Logic III, V; Theme 1 | 2.6 | | 21 | Signatures of autaxic resonance in Large-Scale Structure (LSS). | Dynamic IV; Theme 1 | 2.7 | | 6 | Observable signatures of spacetime emergence. | Dynamic I, V, Meta-Logic I; Theme 2 | 3.1 | | 8 | Existence of novel interaction modes/forces. | Dynamic I, II; Theme 2 | 3.2 | | 10 | Experimental tests for emergent probabilism in QM. | Meta-Logic IV, Dynamic V; Theme 2 | 3.3 | | 11 | Fundamental limits on information density/processing speed. | Dynamic I, Meta-Logic II; Theme 2 | 3.4 | | 12 | Novel conservation laws from autaxic distinguishability. | Meta-Logic II, Dynamic II; Theme 2 | 3.5 | | 17 | Novel mass generation mechanisms / deviations from E=mc². | Dynamics (III, IV, II), Relational Processing; Theme 2 | 3.6 | | 18 | Spacetime granularity and relational limits (Planck scale related). | Dynamic I; Theme 2 | 3.7 | | 20 | Forbidden states/transitions as tests of autaxic coherence. | Meta-Logic I, II; Theme 2 | 3.8 | | 2 | Re-evaluation of the Infoton "particle" within autology. | Dynamics (IV, III), Meta-Logic I; Theme 3 | 4.1 | | 5 | An "Autaxic Table of Patterns" organizing fundamental entities. | Meta-Logic III, Dynamic II, IV, I; Theme 3 | 4.2 | | 15 | "Stability islands" for novel complex autaxic patterns. | Meta-Logic V, Dynamics (III, IV), Meta-Logic I; Theme 3 | 4.3 | | 3 | Methodology for investigating autaxic predictions. | Autology as a scientific approach; Theme 4 | 5.1 | | 4 | Implications of autaxys/autology for experimental physics. | Autology's impact on experimental design/interpretation; Theme 4 | 5.2 | | 16 | Signatures of highly complex/proto-mental autaxic patterning. | Meta-Logic V, Dynamic V, I; Theme 5 | 6.1 | --- ## Phase 5: Final Review & Compilation * **Action:** All approved drafts (Tasks 1-9) were internally assembled into a single compiled document. * **Final AI Check Summary:** Consistent terminology, voice, and formatting. Logical flow. Complete against project goals. User preferences incorporated. Minor formatting adjustments made. * **Product QA for Compiled Draft:** Completed. Self-Critique, Red Teaming, and External Review (Simulated Personas) all resulted in 'Accept' recommendations. --- **(End of Full Project Plan Save State)**