* * * **Introduction:** In considering our existence as an intricate, multidimensional optimization problem, we recognize that every phenomenon we observe, including homelessness, represents a point in an unimaginably vast universe of choices and outcomes. This perspective challenges us to rethink societal phenomena not just in terms of physical presence or absence, but as components of a broader, complex system that encompasses countless dimensions and variables. **Existence as a Multidimensional Optimization Problem:** Our reality, at any given moment, is shaped by a myriad of factors interacting across multiple dimensions. This complexity extends beyond what is immediately observable, incorporating elements of time, space, socio-economic dynamics, individual choices, and systemic structures. In this context, phenomena like homelessness are not aberrations but rather outcomes within this expansive possibility space. **Homelessness in the Universal Choice Spectrum:** From this standpoint, the occurrence of homelessness is a manifestation of certain paths chosen or emergent within this multidimensional space. Its existence in any urban environment, like San Francisco, is a reflection of the optimization of various societal, economic, and individual dimensions. It underscores the notion that if something is possible within the parameters of this universe of choices, it can manifest, irrespective of conventional value judgments. **Implications for Urban Planning and Policy:** This conceptual framework prompts a reevaluation of urban planning and policy-making. It suggests that addressing issues like homelessness requires understanding and maneuvering within this multidimensional space. Policy decisions, therefore, must be informed by recognizing the complexity and multitude of dimensions at play, rather than solely focusing on immediate, observable outcomes. **Beyond Value Judgments:** The question of whether homelessness ‘should’ occur is distinct from the recognition that it ‘can’ occur within the optimization of our multidimensional reality. This distinction is crucial in shaping policy and societal responses. It invites a more nuanced approach that acknowledges the complexity of human existence and societal structures, moving beyond simplistic value judgments towards a deeper understanding of the factors that drive such phenomena. **Conclusion:** Embracing the concept of existence as a highly dimensional optimization problem offers a unique lens through which to view societal challenges like homelessness. It compels us to consider the broader array of possibilities and outcomes that shape our reality and encourages a more comprehensive and nuanced approach in addressing these complex issues in urban planning and policy-making. * * *