**Introduction:** The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on mental health interventions is a topic of increasing interest and significance in the field of psychology and mental health. As AI technologies continue to advance, it is crucial to understand how these innovations may influence the delivery, efficacy, and accessibility of mental health care. Existing debates in this area revolve around the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating AI into mental health interventions, as well as ethical considerations surrounding privacy, data management, and the role of human therapists. This research brief aims to explore the question: What is the impact of artificial intelligence on mental health interventions, and how can its potential be harnessed to improve outcomes for individuals experiencing mental health challenges? The increasing prevalence of mental health disorders worldwide underscores the need for effective interventions that are accessible to diverse populations (World Health Organization, 2020). Traditional face-to-face therapy has long been the gold standard for mental health care; however, recent advances in technology have paved the way for innovative approaches such as internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) and smartphone applications (Andersson, 2016). These developments have expanded access to mental health care, particularly for individuals who face barriers to in-person treatment (e.g., due to geographic location or stigma). Despite these advances, there remains a significant treatment gap in mental health care (Kazdin & Blase, 2011). AI has the potential to address this gap by enhancing existing interventions and developing novel approaches that cater to individual needs. For example, AI-driven algorithms can analyze large amounts of data to provide personalized treatment recommendations based on an individual’s specific symptoms and history (Insel, 2017). Additionally, AI can facilitate real-time monitoring and feedback through wearable devices or smartphone applications, allowing for more proactive support and timely adjustments to treatment plans (Luxton et al., 2011). However, concerns exist regarding the potential risks associated with AI-based mental health interventions, such as the potential for dehumanizing care or exacerbating existing inequalities in access to quality treatment (Vaidyam et al., 2019). Furthermore, ethical dilemmas arise in the context of data privacy and the potential for misuse of sensitive information (Mittelstadt & Floridi, 2016). These debates underscore the complexity of integrating AI into mental health care and highlight the importance of conducting rigorous research to identify best practices and mitigate potential risks. **Literature Review:** A growing body of literature has begun to investigate the impact of AI on mental health interventions, revealing both promising results and areas in need of further exploration. One key theme that emerges from this research is the potential for AI to enhance existing treatments by providing personalized, data-driven recommendations. For example, studies have demonstrated that machine learning algorithms can predict treatment outcomes for individuals with depression based on their symptom profiles and history (Chekroud et al., 2016). This information can be used to inform treatment planning and optimize therapeutic approaches for each individual. Another significant area of research is the development and evaluation of AI-driven mental health interventions, such as chatbots and virtual agents. These tools have been shown to be effective in delivering evidence-based interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for various mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Fitzpatrick et al., 2017; Inkster et al., 2018). Notably, some studies have found that users may be more likely to disclose sensitive information to an AI-driven system than a human therapist due to reduced concerns about judgment or stigma (Lucas et al., 2014). However, concerns have been raised about the potential negative implications of AI-driven mental health care. One critical issue is the potential for biased algorithms that may exacerbate existing inequalities in access to quality care. For example, research has shown that machine learning algorithms can perpetuate biases present in the training data, leading to disparities in treatment recommendations for different demographic groups (Obermeyer et al., 2019). To mitigate these risks, it is crucial to ensure that AI-driven interventions are developed using diverse and representative samples, and that algorithms are regularly audited for potential biases (Gianfrancesco et al., 2018). Another area of concern is the ethical implications of AI-driven mental health care, particularly in relation to data privacy and informed consent. Mental health data is highly sensitive and potentially stigmatizing, making it crucial to implement robust security measures and transparency regarding data collection and usage (Mittelstadt & Floridi, 2016). Additionally, there is a need for clear guidelines on informed consent and user autonomy in the context of AI-driven interventions, ensuring that individuals maintain control over their data and treatment decisions (Martinez-Martin & Kreitmair, 2018). Finally, a key gap in the literature is the lack of research comparing the effectiveness of AI-driven interventions to traditional face-to-face therapy or other established treatment modalities. While preliminary evidence suggests that AI-driven interventions may be effective for certain mental health conditions (Fitzpatrick et al., 2017), more research is needed to determine their relative efficacy compared to established treatments. **Insights and Contributions:** The literature reviewed highlights several key insights into the impact of AI on mental health interventions. First, AI has the potential to enhance existing treatments by providing personalized, data-driven recommendations based on individual symptom profiles and histories. This insight suggests that integrating AI into mental health care may lead to more targeted and responsive treatment plans that cater to each individual’s unique needs. Second, AI-driven mental health interventions, such as chatbots and virtual agents, have demonstrated promising results in delivering evidence-based treatments for various mental health conditions. These tools may offer an accessible and cost-effective alternative to traditional face-to-face therapy, particularly for individuals who face barriers to in-person treatment. However, more research is needed to compare the effectiveness of AI-driven interventions to established treatment modalities. Third, the literature reveals several critical concerns regarding the integration of AI into mental health care, including the potential for biased algorithms and ethical dilemmas related to data privacy and informed consent. These insights underscore the importance of conducting rigorous research to identify best practices for mitigating potential risks and ensuring that AI-driven interventions are developed and implemented in a responsible, ethical manner. The contributions of this research brief include a comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature on the impact of AI on mental health interventions, as well as a discussion of the potential benefits, drawbacks, and ethical considerations surrounding this topic. By exploring these issues in depth, this brief aims to inform future research and policy decisions in this rapidly evolving field. **Results and Discussion:** The findings from the literature reviewed suggest that AI has the potential to significantly impact mental health interventions by enhancing existing treatments, providing personalized recommendations, and offering novel approaches through chatbots and virtual agents. However, these benefits must be weighed against potential risks, including biased algorithms, data privacy concerns, and the need for further research comparing AI-driven interventions to established treatments. One possible direction for future research is to conduct head-to-head comparisons of AI-driven interventions with traditional face-to-face therapy or other established treatment modalities. Such studies would provide valuable information about the relative efficacy of these approaches and help to identify areas where AI-driven interventions may be particularly beneficial or limited in their effectiveness. Additionally, more research is needed on the potential long-term effects of AI-driven mental health care, as well as the optimal ways to integrate these tools into existing care systems. Another important area for future investigation is the development of best practices for mitigating potential risks and ethical concerns associated with AI-driven mental health care. This may include establishing guidelines for data privacy and informed consent, as well as developing methods for auditing algorithms to identify and address potential biases. Furthermore, interdisciplinary collaborations between mental health professionals, AI researchers, and ethicists may be crucial in identifying and addressing the complex ethical dilemmas that arise in this context. Overall, the results of this research brief suggest that AI holds considerable promise for improving mental health interventions by providing personalized, accessible care. However, it is crucial to approach the integration of AI into mental health care with caution and rigor, ensuring that potential risks are carefully considered and addressed through ongoing research and collaboration. **Conclusion:** In conclusion, the impact of artificial intelligence on mental health interventions is a multifaceted issue with significant potential benefits and challenges. AI has the capacity to enhance existing treatments by providing personalized recommendations based on individual symptom profiles and histories, as well as offering novel approaches through chatbots and virtual agents. These innovations have the potential to improve accessibility and outcomes for individuals experiencing mental health challenges. However, it is crucial to consider the potential risks associated with AI-driven mental health care, including biased algorithms, data privacy concerns, and the need for further research comparing AI-driven interventions to established treatments. Future research should focus on addressing these concerns through rigorous comparative studies, interdisciplinary collaborations, and the development of best practices for mitigating potential risks. Ultimately, the integration of AI into mental health interventions holds considerable promise for improving care in this critical field. By carefully considering both the benefits and challenges associated with AI-driven mental health care, researchers and practitioners can work together to harness the potential of these innovations while ensuring ethical, responsible implementation. **References:** Andersson, G. (2016). Internet-delivered psychological treatments. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 157-179. Chekroud, A.M., Zotti, R.J., Shehzad, Z., Gueorguieva, R., Johnson, M.K., Trivedi, M.H., Cannon, T.D., Krystal, J.H., & Corlett, P.R. (2016). Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(3), 243-250. Fitzpatrick, K.K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. Gianfrancesco, M.A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018). Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(11), 1544-1547. Inkster, B., Sarda, S., & Subramanian, V. (2018). An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being: Real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 6(11), e12106. Insel, T.R. (2017). Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA, 318(13), 1215-1216. Kazdin, A.E., & Blase, S.L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 21-37. Lucas, G.M., Gratch, J., King, A., & Morency L.P. (2014). It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 94-100. Luxton, D.D., McCann, R.A., Bush, N.E., Mishkind, M.C., & Reger, G.M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505-512. Martinez-Martin, N., & Kreitmair, K. (2018). Ethical issues for direct-to-consumer digital psychotherapy apps: Addressing accountability, data protection, and consent. JMIR Mental Health, 5(2), e32. Mittelstadt, B.D., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of big data: Current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 303-341. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. Vaidyam, A.N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J.D., Kashavan, M.S., & Torous J.B. (2019). Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: A review of the psychiatric landscape. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(7), 456-464. World Health Organization. (2020). Mental health: Strengthening our response. Retrieved from [https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response](https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response)