The question of whether the universe is meaningless, and the potential implications for the existence of an “intelligent creator,” involves complex philosophical and logical considerations. The references provided offer insights into negation, logic, meaning, and the nature of the universe, which can be synthesized to address this profound question. Negation, as a universal concept present in all languages, plays a fundamental role in logical reasoning and philosophical discourse Alluhaybi (2021). The ability to express negation is essential in shaping our understanding of truth, rationality, and logic itself (Priest, 2005). Furthermore, the analysis of negation in different languages and its impact on discourse provides valuable insights into the nature of meaning and truth functions (Michael, 2014; Mughazy, 2003). In the realm of logic, the concept of logical pluralism and the normative nature of reasoning are crucial considerations in understanding the relationship between logic and reasoning (Beall & Restall, 2005; Evershed, 2021). Logical reasoning and revision, as well as the distinction between logical revision concerning our theory of logic or its subject matter, are central to the philosophical exploration of skepticism and the philosophy of logic (Allo, 2015; Engel, 2005). The references also touch upon the meaning of the quantum universe, spacetime, and theoretical physics, offering perspectives on the relationship between choice, meaning, and the quantum universe (Stapp, 1993; Ishiwara, 2017). Additionally, the research on reasoning logic in Mongolian medicine provides insights into the diverse applications of reasoning and logic in different domains, shedding light on the universal nature of logical reasoning (Tuo, 2017). Theoretical attempts to identify a possible link between the quantum of action and its universal meaning contribute to the discussion on the fundamental nature of physical constants and their potential implications for the meaning of the universe (Ishiwara, 2017). Furthermore, the exploration of meaning as a semantical superstructure offers a universal theory of meaning, truth, and denotation, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the nature of meaning and truth (ROUTLEY, 1977). In conclusion, the synthesis of these references provides a multifaceted approach to addressing the question of the universe’s meaning and the potential existence of an “intelligent creator.” The universal nature of negation, the philosophical exploration of logic and reasoning, and the implications of quantum physics on meaning and truth contribute to a comprehensive understanding of this profound philosophical inquiry. References: Allo, P. (2015). Logic, reasoning and revision. Theoria, 82(1), 3-31. [https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12071](https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12071) Alluhaybi, M. (2021). The arabic negative cycle: an example of historical changes in the arabic language. Humanities and Management Sciences – Scientific Journal of King Faisal University, 22(2). [https://doi.org/10.37575/h/lng/0099](https://doi.org/10.37575/h/lng/0099) Amsterlaw, J. (2006). Children’s beliefs about everyday reasoning. Child Development, 77(2), 443-464. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00881.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00881.x) Andow, J. (2017). Intuition-talk: virus or virtue?. Philosophia, 45(2), 523-531. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9796-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9796-6) Barreira, L., Chu, J., & Valls, C. (2011). Robustness of nonuniform dichotomies with different growth rates. São Paulo Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 5(2), 203. [https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9028.v5i2p203-231](https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9028.v5i2p203-231) Beall, J. and Restall, G. (2005). Logical pluralism.. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001) Bento, A. and Silva, C. (2013). Generalized nonuniform dichotomies and local stable manifolds. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 25(4), 1139-1158. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-013-9331-4](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-013-9331-4) Blake-Turner, C. (2021). Reasons, basing, and the normative collapse of logical pluralism. Philosophical Studies, 178(12), 4099-4118. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01638-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01638-9) Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378-383. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058](https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058) Chardonnet, P., Orloff, J., & Salati, P. (1997). The production of anti-matter in our galaxy. Physics Letters B, 409(1-4), 313-320. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00870-8](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00870-8) Chowdhury, D., Iyer, A., & Laha, R. (2018). Constraints on dark matter annihilation to fermions and a photon. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(5). [https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep05(2018)152](https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep05(2018)152) Crusius, J., Gonzalez, M., Lange, J., & Cohen‐Charash, Y. (2019). Envy: an adversarial review and comparison of two competing views. Emotion Review, 12(1), 3-21. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919873131](https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919873131) DRAGIČEVIĆ, D., SASU, A., & SASU, B. (2022). “on polynomial dichotomies of discrete nonautonomous systems on the half-line”. Carpathian Journal of Mathematics, 38(3), 663-680. [https://doi.org/10.37193/cjm.2022.03.12](https://doi.org/10.37193/cjm.2022.03.12) Dragičević, D. (2020). Admissibility and polynomial dichotomies for evolution families. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 19(3), 1321-1336. [https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2020064](https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2020064) Engel, P. (2005). Logical reasons. Philosophical Explorations, 8(1), 21-38. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1386979042000336135](https://doi.org/10.1080/1386979042000336135) Evershed, J. (2021). Double trouble for logical pluralists. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 121(3), 411-424. [https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoab005](https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoab005) Harvey, A. and Callan, M. (2014). Getting “just deserts” or seeing the “silver lining”: the relation between judgments of immanent and ultimate justice. Plos One, 9(7), e101803. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101803](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101803) Indahingwati, A., Wajdi, M., Susilo, D., Kurniasih, N., & Rahim, R. (2018). Comparison analysis of topsis and fuzzy logic methods on fertilizer selection. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.3), 109. [https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.3.12630](https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.3.12630) Ishiwara, J. (2017). The universal meaning of the quantum of action. The European Physical Journal H, 42(4-5), 523-536. [https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80041-1) Kominsky, J. and Casasanto, D. (2013). Specific to whose body? perspective-taking and the spatial mapping of valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00266](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00266) Lange, J. and Protasi, S. (2021). An interdisciplinary perspective on the value of envy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00548-3](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00548-3) Lee, B. (2023). A kantian critique of benatar’s argument from the cosmic perspective. The Philosophical Forum, 54(3), 185-198. [https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12341](https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12341) McHugh, C. and Way, J. (2016). What is good reasoning?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(1), 153-174. [https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12299](https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12299) Michael, L. (2014). Negation in nanti., 184-215. [https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257023\_010](https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257023_010) Morsanyi, K. and Handley, S. (2012). Logic feels so good—i like it! evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(3), 596-616. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026099](https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026099) Mughazy, M. (2003). Metalinguistic negation and truth functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(8), 1143-1160. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00177-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00177-7) Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 208-216. [https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.10.2.208](https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.10.2.208) Pacheco, J., Grzegorczyk, T., Wu, B., Zhang, Y., & Kong, J. (2002). Power propagation in homogeneous isotropic frequency-dispersive left-handed media. Physical Review Letters, 89(25). [https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.257401](https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.257401) Priest, G. (2005). Doubt truth to be a liar.. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0199263280.001.0001](https://doi.org/10.1093/0199263280.001.0001) ROUTLEY, R. (1977). Meaning as semantical superstructure: a universal theory of meaning, truth and denotation. Philosophica, 19(0). [https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82669](https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82669) Ramakrishna, S. and Martin, O. (2005). Resolving the wave vector in negative refractive index media. Optics Letters, 30(19), 2626. [https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.30.002626](https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.30.002626) Rockman, B. and Hahm, S. (2011). The notion of good and bad governance in comparative perspective. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(2), 1-16. [https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps26201](https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps26201) Saariluoma, P. (2020). Hume’s guillotine resolved., 123-132. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50267-6\_10](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50267-6_10) Sasu, A. (2008). Exponential dichotomy and dichotomy radius for difference equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 344(2), 906-920. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.019) Shen, J. (2005). Optical refractive index of massive particles and physical meanings of left-handed media. Physics Letters A, 344(2-4), 144-148. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.067](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.067) Stapp, H. (1993). Choice and meaning in the quantum universe., 185-196. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08765-7\_8](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08765-7_8) Suganuma, H. (2017). Matter–antimatter coexistence method for finite density qcd. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement, 10(4), 989. [https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.10.989](https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.10.989) Tuo, S. (2017). Research on reasoning logic in mongolian medicine. Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 9. [https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170501.13](https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170501.13) Unnikrishnan, C. (2014). True dynamical tests of the weak equivalence principle for matter and anti-matter. International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, 30, 1460267. [https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194514602671](https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194514602671) Wainwright, P. (2002). Consent to open label extension studies: some ethical issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28(6), 373-376. [https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.6.373](https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.6.373) Willaschek, M. (2022). Death and existential value: in defence of epicurus. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 106(2), 475-492. [https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12873](https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12873) Yu, J. (2017). Proposing a process-oriented systems research for systems thinking development. Systems, 5(2), 34. [https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5020034](https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5020034)