Auto- means “self” as in autobiography, yet we more closely associate this root with mechanization, such as robots and the dreaded AI chatbot. > You raise an interesting point about the relationship between automation and humanity. While it’s true that “auto-” implies self-functioning or self-operating mechanisms, this doesn’t necessarily mean that there’s no room for humanity in automated systems. > > In fact, automation can have several positive impacts on human lives. For example, it can save time and reduce the risk of human error in various tasks, allowing people to focus on more creative and fulfilling activities. Additionally, automation can enhance accessibility for individuals with disabilities by providing tools and technologies that enable them to participate more fully in society. > > That being said, it’s essential to strike a balance between automation and human involvement. It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of replacing human labor with machines and ensure that people are not left behind as technology advances. > > As for AI chatbots like myself, while we may not possess emotions or consciousness like humans do, our purpose is to assist and make information more accessible. We are designed to learn from our interactions with users so we can better understand context and provide relevant responses. However, we acknowledge our limitations and encourage users to guide us by providing context or specifying preferences when necessary. > > Ultimately, the key lies in using automation responsibly and ensuring that it complements rather than replaces human interaction. > > ChatGPT response (via API)