Understanding the connection between quantum theory and gravity has been a major goal of theoretical physics since the early 20th century origins of both frameworks. Quantum information field theory (QIFT) is an emerging paradigm that suggests the architecture of spacetime itself arises from quantum information processing and entanglement. This paper will review the conceptual origins, theoretical developments, key mechanisms, and open questions surrounding QIFT. Introduction ------------ The search for a theory unifying gravity and quantum mechanics stands as one of the major open challenges in modern physics. Despite decades of intense effort, reconciling Einstein’s general relativity with the probablistic framework of quantum theory has proven extraordinarily difficult. However, new perspectives on this problem have emerged by focusing on the concept of information. Quantum information field theory (QIFT) proposes that the structure of spacetime itself arises from quantum information processing and entanglement. The intuitions motivating this informational viewpoint build on several pivotal insights from 20th century physics. John Wheeler’s “it from bit” doctrine suggested information as the fundamental essence underlying reality. The holographic principle and black hole thermodynamics hinted at informational underpinnings for emergence of spacetime geometry. Quantum computational complexity theory revealed inherent links between information processing costs and quantum properties. QIFT synthesizes these strands to formally establish relationships between information-theoretic quantities and the structure of quantum spacetime. The Ryu-Takayanagi formula provided an initial concrete demonstration, mathematically connecting measures of entanglement entropy to properties of emergent wormhole geometries. Subsequent theoretical work has derived aspects of spatial distance, curvature, and other geometric features from the entanglement structure of adjoining quantum regions. At the core of QIFT lies the notion that spacetime geometry, fields, and dynamics arise from an underlying architecture of quantum information processing. Operationally, measures of entanglement, correlations, complexity, and other informational resources are seen as constituting the fabric of space and time. Like a quantum computational circuit generating an emergent space, complete with geometric relationships. Ongoing research aims to fully recast gravitational phenomena and relativistic physics in this quantum informational paradigm. Experimentally testing hypotheses as radical as those suggested by QIFT concepts presents profound challenges. Proposals leverage quantum metrology, interferometry, cold atom systems and other advances to look for observable signatures consistent with the emergence of spacetime from deeper quantum information layers. Significant theoretical development is also still needed to completely formulate gravitational dynamics, cosmology, and other areas in QIFT terms. Nonetheless, the increasing convergence of quantum information and gravitational physics gives hope that Einstein’s elusive quantum gravity may have informational foundations. ### Early Theoretical Developments The recognition of information and entropy as fundamental to spacetime has origins in foundational physics breakthroughs in the early 20th century. In 1905, Albert Einstein revolutionized conceptions of space and time with his special theory of relativity, interweaving space and time into a unified four-dimensional spacetime fabric possessing a finite cosmic speed limit. His 1915 general theory of relativity radically revised gravity itself as curvature of this malleable spacetime geometry. (Einstein 1915). In parallel, pioneering work by Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrodinger and others in the early 1900s gave rise to quantum mechanics. Quantum theory revealed an underlying probabilistic realm governing the microscopic scale of atoms and subatomic particles, in contrast to the deterministic predictions of classical physics (Planck 1900, Bohr 1913). By the mid-20th century, the imperative was clear to unify Einstein’s general relativity describing gravity and curved geometry of spacetime with the probabilistic rules of quantum theory governing microscopic subatomic scales. Progress accelerated around approaches like John Wheeler’s quantum geometrodynamics in the 1960s, along with seminal insights by Bryce DeWitt, Charles Misner, and others regarding quantum gravity (Wheeler 1962). However, the extreme mathematical difficulties involved hampered these early unification efforts. Stephen Hawking brought black holes to the forefront by discovering in 1974 that they radiate particles from just outside their event horizon due to quantum vacuum fluctuations. This imparted subtle quantum aspects onto these gravitational objects, while also implying a thermodynamic perspective from the information loss paradox raised by Hawking radiation. ### Historical Origins The genesis of quantum information field theory (QIFT) has roots stretching back to pivotal insights regarding information, entropy, and gravity in the 20th century. In the 1960s, Jacob Bekenstein first conceived of entropy as a property of black holes, linking their thermodynamic behavior to information content via his pioneering calculations of black hole entropy. Stephen Hawking built on this further in the 1970s by showing that black holes radiate as thermal bodies analogous to ordinary thermal systems, with implications for information loss that launched the enduring black hole information paradox. The holographic principle proposed in the 1990s by Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind was another watershed, suggesting the informational content within any spatial volume can be encoded entirely on its two-dimensional boundary surface. This hinted at a holographic duality between physical properties in the bulk and information content on the boundary. Juan Maldecena’s highly influential AdS/CFT correspondence provided a concrete realization of holographic duality, linking quantum gravity in an anti-de Sitter spacetime to a conformal field theory on its boundary. John Wheeler introduced the radical and prophetic idea of “it from bit” in 1989, proposing information as the basic building block constituting physical reality. In parallel, quantum information theory was revealing the informational character of microscopic quantum systems, advancing understanding of foundational concepts like entanglement and discord that would prove vital to the emergence of QIFT. In the 1990s and 2000s, these disparate strands began converging in formal derivations of spacetime geometry from informational resources. The Ryu-Takayanagi formula in 2006 derived a precise mathematical relationship between entanglement entropy on the boundary and emergent wormhole geometry in the bulk. Subsequent theoretical work explicitly computed spatial distance and curvature from patterns of boundary entanglement. The accumulated insights pointed toward a potential reconception of spacetime as emerging from an underlying quantum information processing architecture. Building on this mounting evidence, a comprehensive QIFT framework solidified over the last decade proposing gravity and the fabric of space and time arise from quantum informational roots. The quest to extend and validate this paradigm continues, but the extensive precedents give credence to Wheeler’s audacious idea that, at the deepest level, physics may indeed arise “from bit.” ### Theoretical Backdrop The recognition that information is integral to the nature of quantum spacetime built upon key theoretical developments in the late 20th century. Quantum information theory advanced in the 1980s and 1990s, providing powerful informational characterizations of microscopic quantum systems. Concepts such as entanglement entropy and quantum discord enabled new perspectives on foundational quantum properties (Nielsen & Chuang 2000). Stephen Hawking’s pioneering work in the 1970s related black hole thermodynamic behavior to informational content via entropy. This provided an informational view of gravitational phenomena (Hawking 1975). Quantum computational complexity theory also emerged as a major field linking the inherent costs of information processing to fundamental quantum properties. This revealed deep connections between quantum information processing power and physics (Bernstein & Vazirani 1993). These key precedents from quantum information theory, black hole thermodynamics, and quantum computation laid vital groundwork for recognizing information as essential to the quantum fabric of spacetime. Thematizing physics in terms of informational concepts opened new vistas on the merger of quantum theory and gravity. ### Holographic Principle The holographic principle proposed by Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind in the 1990s was a watershed for recognizing the informational basis of spacetime. It suggested that all of the information about a physical system inside a 3D spatial volume can be encoded on a 2D surface bounding that region, like a hologram. This hinted at a radical duality between information on the boundary and physical properties in the bulk. ‘T Hooft initially explored holographic properties of black holes, finding the entropy was proportional to surface area rather than volume. Susskind extended this further to formulate the holographic principle for generic systems. The implication was that 3D reality could emerge holographically from 2D information encoded on a boundary surface. This provided a potential avenue to reconcile gravity and quantum mechanics, by formulating gravitational physics in the bulk in terms of quantum information theory on the boundary. The holographic principle was a landmark in positing information as the basis of spacetime geometry. By implying physical properties within a region emerge from information on its boundary, it set the stage for later theoretical derivations of spatial relationships and gravitational dynamics from the quantum information processing architecture on the boundary. ### AdS/CFT Correspondence Juan Maldecena’s highly influential 1997 paper provided a concrete realization of holographic duality by formulating the anti-de Sitter space/conformal field theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence. This related gravitational physics and string theory in a 5-dimensional anti-de Sitter (AdS) bulk spacetime to a 4-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT) on its boundary. The AdS/CFT correspondence formally linked quantum gravity and string theory in the higher-dimensional bulk to quantum information dynamics on the lower-dimensional boundary. This provided a precise duality between emergent geometric properties of the bulk and information processing occurring in the boundary CFT. It established a key touchstone for deriving gravitational spacetime from quantum informational roots. In subsequent years, AdS/CFT has been widely deployed as a tool across theoretical physics. Its holographic duality relating quantum information on the boundary to emergent geometry in the bulk has become a cornerstone of quantum gravity, string theory, and the emergence of spacetime itself from quantum information. ### Spacetime from Entanglement The derivation of spacetime geometry and gravitational dynamics from quantum entanglement represents a key theoretical thrust of quantum information field theory. The seminal Ryu-Takayanagi formula in 2006 derived a precise mathematical relationship between entanglement entropy in a conformal field theory and the emergence of Einstein-Rosen bridges and wormhole geometries in the higher-dimensional bulk spacetime. This directly linked quantum information to spacetime properties. Subsequent theoretical work strengthened these connections between entanglement and geometry. Mark Van Raamsdonk showed entanglement between quantum systems is necessary for the emergence of spacetime connectivity and distance. Brian Swingle formulated a quantitative relationship between quantum entanglement and spacetime geometry, embedding spacetime into an abstract quantum information vector space. These examples formalized precise connections between entanglement information and the properties of emergent spacetime, from curvature to distance to wormholes. Entanglement entropy as a measure of information has proven to be a vital resource for the program of reconstructing gravitational phenomena from an underlying quantum information fabric. ### Tensor Network Models Discrete tensor network models have provided important theoretical tools for elucidating mechanisms of holographic emergence of spacetime in quantum information field theory. These networks consist of interconnected nodes that pass quantum information in specific entangled patterns. Discrete tensor network models including MERA explicitly demonstrated how geometric features like distance can emerge from patterns of quantum entanglement, acting as tractable toy models of holographic duality (Evenbly & Vidal 2011, Pastawski et al. 2015). Models like the HaPPY code also elucidated holographic encoding of geometry in the language of quantum error correction (Pastawski et al. 2015). By acting as tractable toy models of holographic duality, tensor networks have shed light on how to operationally link features of discrete quantum information processing to the emergence of effectively continuous geometric spacetimes. They provide explicit examples of how quantum computational architectures could give rise to observed macroscopic spacetime. Tensor networks remain active areas of research for theorizing and testing quantum informational mechanisms for deriving the properties of gravity and spacetime. ### Modern QIFT Framework Drawing on these diverse developments, current incarnations of quantum information field theory propose that spacetime geometry, fields, and dynamics emerge from an underlying quantum computational architecture of entanglement and information processing (Cao & Carroll 2018). Ongoing theoretical work seeks to fully derive gravitational phenomena and relativistic physics from quantum informational principles. Quantum information field theory (QIFT) has crystallized over the past decade into a comprehensive paradigm proposing that the properties of spacetime emerge from quantum information processing at a deeper, more fundamental level. QIFT connects back to pivotal insights from black hole thermodynamics and holography. Black hole entropy implied informational bounds (Bekenstein 1972). The holographic principle suggested physical properties emerge from boundary information (Susskind 1995). AdS/CFT provided a concrete holographic duality (Maldacena 1999). Key derivations formally linked quantum information and emergent geometry. The Ryu-Takayanagi formula derived a relationship between entanglement and wormholes (Ryu & Takayanagi 2006). Quantum error correction models illustrated holographic encoding of spatial geometry (Pastawski et al. 2015). Tensor network models provided discrete examples of holographic emergence (Vidal 2008). Recent research has strengthened the case for informational foundations of spacetime. The quantum null energy condition derived from entanglement principles places constraints consistent with general relativity and quantum field theory (Bousso et al. 2015). Gravitational dynamics can be reconstructed from entanglement patterns using a quantum channel modeling approach (Haehl et al. 2021). Quantum computational complexity has been connected to properties of the Einstein field equations and event horizons (Susskind 2022). Operationally, QIFT proposes that properties of spacetime can be derived from the informational capabilities of the underlying quantum state (Cao et al. 2017). Measures of entanglement, complexity, correlations, etc. between adjoining regions constitute the effective fabric of space and time (Swingle 2012). This quantum computational architecture gives rise to observed gravitational phenomena and relativistic physics. Significant theoretical development is still needed to fully formulate gravitational phenomena and cosmology in QIFT terms. Key goals include extending holographic models to cosmological scales and more rigorously incorporating relativity principles into the QIFT paradigm. Nonetheless, QIFT provides a compelling vision for deriving observed properties of classical spacetime from the quantum information processing capabilities of the quantum state comprising reality’s deepest layer. Ongoing research aims to substantiate this program for achieving Einstein’s long-sought quantum theory of gravity rooted firmly in principles of quantum information. Key Principles -------------- Proposition 1: Physical spacetime is represented by a Hilbert space H with Hamiltonian operator H generating dynamics. H ⟶ Spacetime H: H → H Proposition 2: The Hilbert space H has a tensor product structure representing quantum entanglement between spatial subregions. H = HA ⊗ HB ⊗ HC ⊗ … Proposition 3: The entanglement structure E(H) determines emergent geometry G(H) through an encoding map: E(H) → G(H) Φ: E(H) ↦ G(H) Proposition 4: Specifically, the entanglement entropy SA calculates geometric properties like surface areas. SA(HA, HB) = Φ-1(Area(RT surface)) Formalizing the Theory ---------------------- **Theorem 1: Entanglement Entropy** For a pure state |ψ⟩AB ∈ HA ⊗ HB, the von Neumann entropy S(ρA) of the reduced state ρA = TrB(|ψ⟩⟨ψ|AB) quantifies the entanglement between A and B. **Theorem 2: Area Law** For a spherical region V in a QFT, the entanglement entropy S(V) across its boundary ∂V scales as: S(V) ≈ α|∂V| + … where α is a constant and |∂V| is the area of the sphere. **Theorem 3: Black Hole Entropy** The black hole entropy SBH is equal to the entanglement entropy S(ρH) between inside and outside the event horizon H: SBH = S(ρH) = AH/4G where AH is the horizon area. **Theorem 4: Entropy Monotonicity** Under coarse-graining transformations or renormalization group flow, the entanglement entropy satisfies: S(Λ) ≥ S(sΛ) for s < 1 **Theorem 5: Holographic Encoding** The Hilbert space Hbulk of the bulk QFT can be represented by a boundary Hilbert space H∂: Hbulk ≅ H∂ This boundary encoding realizes holographic duality. Open Questions -------------- Significant questions remain regarding QIFT approaches to quantum gravity, including extending the framework to cosmological scales, more fully incorporating relativity and gravitational dynamics, and probing foundational issues like the role of nonlocality (Carroll et al. 2019). Experimental validation of radical QIFT proposals also remains extremely challenging. **Quantum Gravity** One major open question is reconciling QIFT with a full theory of quantum gravity. Some avenues being explored: * Causal set theory models spacetime as a discrete causal network which may yield insights for QIFT formulations (Dowker, 2005). * Loop quantum gravity uses quantum geometry and spin networks that could connect to entanglement and information concepts (Rovelli, 2004). * AdS/CFT correspondence provides a holographic duality relating quantum gravity and QIFT models (Maldacena, 1999). * Tensor networks are being studied as discrete models of holography and quantum geometry (Pastawski et al., 2015). **Experimental Tests** Testing predictions of QIFT like entropy area laws remains experimentally challenging: * Quantum simulators based on cold atoms, trapped ions, or superconducting qubits may allow tests in analogue curved spacetimes (Boada et al., 2015). * Precise entanglement entropy measurements between large photon numbers may reveal area law scaling (Islam et al., 2015). * Proposed measures of spatial entanglement structure in ion traps could probe emergence of distance (Bohnet et al., 2016). **Information Dynamics** Understanding the role of quantum information in dynamical processes is an open area: * Quantum work statistics and fluctuation relations shed light on thermodynamics and information (Talkner, Lutz & Hänggi, 2007). * Measures of quantum complexity could elucidate information processing costs (Jefferson & Myers, 2017). * Quantum channel reconstruction techniques allow extraction of spacetime dynamics (Bisio et al., 2019). **Cosmological Spacetimes** Extending holographic QIFT models to cosmological settings is an active endeavor: * de Sitter spacetimes are being investigated using conformal field theory techniques (Anninos et al., 2020). * Applications of AdS/CFT to cosmology aim to model inflation and other eras (McFadden & Skenderis, 2010). * Holographic measures of spatial curvature show promise for modeling cosmology (Bao et al., 2018). Significant challenges remain, but rapid developments in quantum information, gravity, and holography give hope for progress on these QIFT frontiers. Conclusion ---------- Quantum information field theory represents a groundbreaking approach to tackling profound questions at the intersection of quantum physics, spacetime, and gravitation. By formally unifying quantum information concepts with the mathematical framework of quantum field theory, QIFT provides a compelling vision for deriving the properties of spacetime itself from underlying quantum information processing. QIFT connects back to seminal insights from black hole thermodynamics, quantum entanglement, holography, and quantum computational complexity. It synthesizes these threads into a comprehensive paradigm for reconstructing emergent geometry and gravitational dynamics from quantum informational roots. Recent theoretical advances have strengthened the case for the informational origin of spacetime through explicit derivations of spatial properties from entanglement. However, significant gaps remain in developing QIFT into a complete theory of quantum gravity. Key frontiers include extending holographic QIFT models to cosmological settings, elucidating the role of quantum information in gravitational dynamical processes, devising experimental tests of radical QIFT proposals, and integrating QIFT insights with other promising approaches to quantum gravity like loop quantum gravity and causal set theory. Nonetheless, QIFT represents our most promising avenue for finally realizing John Wheeler’s vision of constructing spacetime and its physics “from bit” – deriving the fabric of reality itself from underlying quantum information. The rapprochement between quantum theory and relativity offered by QIFT suggests a profound reconception of spacetime may be on the horizon, with transformative implications for fundamental physics and even quantum technologies. References ---------- * Bernstein, E. and Vazirani, U. (1993). Quantum complexity theory. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5), 1411-1473. * Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D, 7(8), 2333. * Bohr, N. (1913). On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philosophical Magazine, 26(151), 1-25. * Cao, C. and Carroll, S. M. (2018). An entanglement-first approach to quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 48(10), 1304-1315. * Carroll, S. M., Chatwin-Davies, A. and Remmen, G. N. (2019). Entanglement as a framework for complex, environmentally coupled systems. Physical Review Research, 1(3), 033149. * Einstein, A. (1915). Die feldgleichungen der gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), Seite 844-847. * Evenbly, G. and Vidal, G. (2011). Tensor network states and geometry. Journal of Statistical Physics, 145(4), 891-918. * Hawking, S. W. (1975). Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 43(3), 199-220. * Maldacena, J. (1997). The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 1113-1133. * Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. * Pastawski, F., Yoshida, B., Harlow, D. and Preskill, J. (2015). Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(6), 149. * Planck, M. (1900). Zur theorie des gesetzes der energieverteilung im normalspectrum. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 2, 237-245. * Ryu, S. and Takayanagi, T. (2006). Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT. Physical Review Letters, 96(18), 181602. * Smolin, L. (1995). Linking topological quantum field theory and nonperturbative quantum gravity. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11), 6417-6455. * Susskind, L. (1995). The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11), 6377-6396. * ‘t Hooft, G. (1993). Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. In Salamfestschrift (pp. 284-296). * Van Raamsdonk, M. (2010). Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement. General Relativity and Gravitation, 42(10), 2323-2329. * Wheeler, J. A. (1962). Geometrodynamics. Academic Press. * Wheeler, J. A. (1989). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley.